Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Lauri Watts
On Monday 03 March 2003 00.23, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Well I am trying to be constructive. Not just a compainer...although it > sounds that way (having spent 2 unsuccessful days trying to get the > latest KDE ports installed). We obviously test the ports on a wide variety of systems, but we ca

Incoming mail refused by sendmail

2003-03-02 Thread Kjell
I have a gateway (sexy.la3sg.net) connected to my ISP through a ADSL line. On my LAN I have a workstation (tina.la3sg.net) I would like to set up sendmail so that external mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrives at user sexy on sexy.la3sg.net, and mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ends up at user tina on bo

ad-hoc wireless mode and ticks

2003-03-02 Thread Kan Cai
Hi, All: Feel a little confused with the ad-hoc mode set by "wicontrol -p 3", is it Lucent ad-hoc mode instead of the standard IEEE ad-hoc mode (IBSS). After I use "-p 3" option, it cannot talk to Linux/Windows ad-hoc wireless station. But if I set it to "-p 4", it can do the job. However, I

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 08:55 pm, Roger Merritt wrote: > At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > >What portupgrade options are you using? When you do "-r", you have > > to force "-f". > > Very interesting. Where is that documented? I just did a quick read > through the portupgrade man page an

Re: Updating limxsml2

2003-03-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 00:39, Roger Merritt wrote: > OK, before I present my problem, I'd like to ask if I should be posting > questions about ports to the freebsd-ports list, or should I be e-mailing > the maintainer of the port? > > I've been trying for quite a long time to upgrade libsxml2. Th

Updating limxsml2

2003-03-02 Thread Roger Merritt
OK, before I present my problem, I'd like to ask if I should be posting questions about ports to the freebsd-ports list, or should I be e-mailing the maintainer of the port? I've been trying for quite a long time to upgrade libsxml2. The build invariably stops in /usr/home/ports/textproc/libxm

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Roger Merritt
At 05:15 AM 3/3/03, Kent Stewart wrote: What portupgrade options are you using? When you do "-r", you have to force "-f". Very interesting. Where is that documented? I just did a quick read through the portupgrade man page and don't see anything about it. I believe you, and I'm going to try it o

ppp (was Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.)

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
This definitely worked! It's too slow, maybe cause I left "enable dns", I'll get it working fine. Thanks Alexey! Pedro. --- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > What version of mustdie you use? > if 95/98 try to run WINIPCFG.EXE while in connect > to ISP... as i can >

Re: systat like statistics to a flat file ?

2003-03-02 Thread Sean O'Neill
On Web, 26 Feb 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: >> Is there anything in FreeBSD or the ports that will collect statistics >> similar to those displayed by systat and drop them to a flat file ? > > man systat says: > > SEE ALSO > netstat(1), kvm(3), icmp(4), ip(4), tcp(4), udp(4), iostat(8), vmstat(8) Sorr

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 07:20 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have > > shown x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen > > that y depended on x and z. I wo

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Erickson
* Kirk Strauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have shown > > x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen that y depended > > on x and z. I would speci

Re: 5.0 and ACPI Errors:

2003-03-02 Thread Lord Sith
The only two I see in this BIOS are: Plug and Play = ON or OFF (currently on) IRQ Resources Assigned = AUTO or MANUAL (currently auto) Is this what you are referring to? I may give -CURRENT a try. Since this is just a "poke around and play system" I've got it running on. From: John Murphy <[EMA

Re: instant-workstation can't find ldes (for postfix)

2003-03-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:11:17PM -0500, Tom Parquette wrote: > >cvsup the ports collection and retry the port build. Since you don't > >have libdes, you have a fresh installation of 4.x from within the last > >couple of weeks (older systems have libdes, which was included with > >the old openss

Re: shutdown now probs

2003-03-02 Thread Andy Farkas
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I have an annoying problem. Whenever I want to go to single user mode > and run "shutdown now" the system freezes. Nothing happens; I one > waited for ten minutes or more. Sometimes toggling "ctrl+c" or "enter, > enter, enter" smees to work but I never

Re: ATAPICAM problems in 4.7

2003-03-02 Thread Rod Person
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 04:18:19 +0100 Clement Laforet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 21:16:49 -0500 > Rod Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > I just went back to 4.7 from 5.0. I'm trying to get the atapicam to work. I > > cvsup'd all may src. Did a make world and re

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-03T02:19:38Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are basically doing the same thing. A portversion -c would have shown > x, y, and z. When I check the versions, I would have seen that y depended > on x and z. I would specify x and z on the -ruf. This is what I called > an i

Re: ATAPICAM problems in 4.7

2003-03-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Rod Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just went back to 4.7 from 5.0. I'm trying to get the atapicam to work. I cvsup'd > all may src. Did a make world and rebuild my kernel and added the device ATAPICAM. > Everything went well! > > Ok on reboot it doesn't list my cd or dvd as a scsi devic

Problem using Fluxbox as Gnome2 Window Manager

2003-03-02 Thread Adam
I set my WINDOW_MANAGER variable to the full path for fluxbox, and launch startx .. Gnome loads up, then loads fluxbox, but then gets stuck for about 90 seconds while on the 'Window Manager' part of the loading dialog. After 90 seconds or so, the loading dialog finishes and the rest of Gnome2 is l

Re: ATAPICAM problems in 4.7

2003-03-02 Thread Clement Laforet
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 21:16:49 -0500 Rod Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, > > I just went back to 4.7 from 5.0. I'm trying to get the atapicam to work. I cvsup'd > all may src. Did a make world and rebuild my kernel and added the device ATAPICAM. > Everything went well! > > Ok on reboot it

Re: Ok, KDE/Help .. after my moans what now ?

2003-03-02 Thread Gary D Kline
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:19:27AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Hello, > Ok so portupgrde did not work in installing the latest KDE. > I cannot get KDE to run at all. > I get errors about libintl being missing. > Plus a mysterious and new requirement to tell make I have a Matrox 450 > card. > Pl

Re: instant-workstation can't find ldes (for postfix)

2003-03-02 Thread Tom Parquette
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Tom Parquette wrote: This is due to the upgrade of openssl. Have you tried cvsupping and retying? Most of the problems have already been fixed. If it persists, then please report which port was building when it failed (not insta

Re: machine accounts and samba

2003-03-02 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 11:48 AM +0100 3/2/03, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: charles pelletier wrote: how do you add a machine account in samba? i've already added users using 'smbpasswd -a username password' but cannot for the life of me remember how to add a machine to the samba domain. man smbpasswd smbpasswd -m Then

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Mock
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Daxbert wrote: Quoting Matthew Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming the PR database. OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find

Re: I think I'm addicted...

2003-03-02 Thread John Murphy
John Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >True, but having given this question considerable thought, I'd choose >(from left to right) LSD BSD. But I guess Nike would disapprove >of the first. Oh well. Doh! I should've read this first http://web.morons.org/feature/rants/bsdlsd.jsp Myth shattered.

Re: Help PLEAS galeon crashing on startup

2003-03-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 18:31, stan wrote: > Could some kind soul give me a pointer on how to solve a very perplexing > problem? > > I've got a 4.7 STABLE machine that Galeon started crashing (core dumps on > startup) about 3 weeks ago. > > Since then I've cvsup'd and made world 3 times, and did po

disallowing the user/pass login method for a key system?

2003-03-02 Thread Bsd Neophyte
i finally got my key-pair system working... sort of a makeshift eToken system. however, i only want to allow this sytem for system access. i don't want to allow for the standard user/pass authentication system. right now i changed the following: # To disable tunneled clear text passwords, chan

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
> > Sure it does. The manpage of ppp(8) includes: > > 8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your > nameserver address(es) with > the line > > enable dns > I did this, and I'm not running named. Thanks to Alexey's hints I found the values I needed though. thanks,

Re: gnome-session?

2003-03-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:25, blah wrote: > I just installed gnome2 with pkg_add -r gnome2 > and was about to edit my xinitrc file to run gnome-session, but > gnome-session does not exist in /usr/X11R6/bin/ where it is supposed to. > What do I need to do to fix this? Sounds like all of the GNOM

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
> 8. Ask your ISP to authenticate your nameserver address(es) with > the line > > enable dns > hi said in prevous posts that : >Anyway, it's not even an option since I've been unable >to set up ppp properly. It connects fine but it >doesn't resolv any address, a

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
> Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to > write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it, > but I still have to find out why :(. freeBSD also ;) I for example getting it automaticaly from ISP and written in resolv.conf To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsub

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-03 03:16, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of > > ISP's dns-server? > > It is getting it through ppp. > > Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write

Re: problems

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-02 11:39, Paul Patryas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have 2 questions: > > One is when I installed Freebsd 5.0 from a DOS partition, it gave > me an error message: > > Error mounting /dev/adOs1 on /dist: > Operation not supported by device (19) > > The second one is when I installed th

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 05:25 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-03-03T00:28:21Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The -rR bothers me because it is making a lot of ports that don't > > need to be updated. > > It was my understand that if `-rR' would upgrade a port, then that > port need

ATAPICAM problems in 4.7

2003-03-02 Thread Rod Person
Ok, I just went back to 4.7 from 5.0. I'm trying to get the atapicam to work. I cvsup'd all may src. Did a make world and rebuild my kernel and added the device ATAPICAM. Everything went well! Ok on reboot it doesn't list my cd or dvd as a scsi device. camcontrol -devlist returns nothing. I eve

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- "Alexey V. Litvinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of > ISP's dns-server? > It is getting it through ppp. > Yeah I meant that Windows doesn't ask the user to write it down. FreeBSD's chap doesn't seem to get it, but I still have t

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Alexey V. Litvinov
> Thanks! I'll do this when I find more time to hunt the > problem. What's weird (for me) is that I don't have > their DNS IP address: since Windows doesn't need it, > the ISP doesn't provide it. hmm why you thinking that Windows doesn't need ip of ISP's dns-server? It is getting it through ppp.

macromedia linux flash 6

2003-03-02 Thread Guillaume
Hi, Is it possible to install macromedia linux flash player v6 on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? I'm currently running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT and mozilla-devel (mozilla-1.3b) from ports (www/mozilla-devel). linux flash 5.0r51 + freebsd wrapper v0.20021113 works very well. Thanks in advance! Guillaume

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-02T23:36:45Z, Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, I've succesfully survived XFree, gnumeric, and mozilla upgrades > this way. Good to know! > I do religiously add any port build options to pkgtools.conf though, so > that I never have to do any 'interactive' portbuild. I'

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-03T00:28:21Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The -rR bothers me because it is making a lot of ports that don't need to > be updated. It was my understand that if `-rR' would upgrade a port, then that port needs to be upgraded. For a non-FreeBSD perspective, look at Debian:

gnome-session?

2003-03-02 Thread blah
I just installed gnome2 with pkg_add -r gnome2 and was about to edit my xinitrc file to run gnome-session, but gnome-session does not exist in /usr/X11R6/bin/ where it is supposed to. What do I need to do to fix this? Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe fr

Ok, KDE/Help .. after my moans what now ?

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
Hello, Ok so portupgrde did not work in installing the latest KDE. I cannot get KDE to run at all. I get errors about libintl being missing. Plus a mysterious and new requirement to tell make I have a Matrox 450 card. Plus the fact I cannot even re-intall KDE from the 4.7 ISO CD's. I get the highly

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
I just sent my ports to Jens... thanks!! Also thank you to everyone that made jokes in private...I'm still laughing :-P. Pedro. __ Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino http://it.yahoo.com/

Re: problems

2003-03-02 Thread John Murphy
John Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>No /kernel > >Where did you install the OS? Bear in mind you can't run FreeBSD from a >'logical' partition. Think I should've said 'extended' there, sorry. John. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the bod

Re: Help PLEAS galeon crashing on startup

2003-03-02 Thread Clement Laforet
> > Pleas, pleas can someone help me get this working? What should I try next? > Do you use special fonts ? try without "extended" X fonts. clem To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Re: log rotation

2003-03-02 Thread Clement Laforet
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 23:50:55 + "Chad Kline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 4.7, I notice the > following problem: > > Once a month when my log files rotate > (simply gzipping the old, and the creating a new empty log file > via a cron job) the log files stay empty

Re: log rotation

2003-03-02 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:50:55PM +, Chad Kline wrote: > > Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 4.7, I notice the > following problem: > > Once a month when my log files rotate > (simply gzipping the old, and the creating a new empty log file > via a cron job) the log files stay empty. all permissio

Re: Trouble with Starting the Network

2003-03-02 Thread Clement Laforet
Hi Nelson, > The error messages are on boot up: > Doing initial network setup: hostname. > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 as you can see lnc1 isn't up. does your FreeBSD detect

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:24 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > portupgrade -puf portupgrade > > portupgrade -pufr png > > portupgrade -pufr fontconfig > > portupgrade -pufr libxml2 > > portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu > > Interesting.

Hello and a question :)

2003-03-02 Thread Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek
Hi there all, I'm new on the list, and decided to start with a question: I'm using FreeBSD 4.7 for quite a time now (at least I think :) ) and I wanted to get my scanner to work. I own a Starlight StarScan 4800 (some say it is made by Ultimate, but I'm not sure) with FCC-ID: ITEUECMT3. It is co

Trouble with Starting the Network

2003-03-02 Thread Nelson Headley
I have just installed FreeBSD on a Compaq Deskpro XL 6150 computer. I loaded it from the FreeBSD FTP site directly on to the computer. The system seems to run fine, but it is not able to reach my network. It is a small TCP/IP network, running a few PCs on Windows 98, with an NT 4.0 Server, and a f

log rotation

2003-03-02 Thread Chad Kline
Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 4.7, I notice the following problem: Once a month when my log files rotate (simply gzipping the old, and the creating a new empty log file via a cron job) the log files stay empty. all permissions and ownerships are correct. it takes a "reboot" - then the daemons are

make arts

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
Ok, a make in the port of arts... c++: /usr/local/lib/.libs/libogg.so: No such file or directory gmake[3]: *** [libgsl.la.closure] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/arts/work/arts-1.1/flow/gsl' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/

Re: ADSL modem and Security

2003-03-02 Thread taxman
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:08 pm, Defryn, Guy wrote: > I am thinking about getting an ADSL connection and I would like to know > which (internal) ADSL modems work well with Freebsd. I don't know, but check the hardware notes on the FreeBSD.org website. also any adsl modem that interfaces intellige

Re: RFC 1912 compliant ISP's...

2003-03-02 Thread taxman
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:15 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > > I'm starting to feel like I'm the only one in the > > surrounding 3 counties that would know how > > to do it righttoo bad I have no brain for > > business, 'cause otherwise I could run an > > ISP bette

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:24:21PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > portupgrade -puf portupgrade > > portupgrade -pufr png > > portupgrade -pufr fontconfig > > portupgrade -pufr libxml2 > > portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu > > Int

Help PLEAS galeon crashing on startup

2003-03-02 Thread stan
Could some kind soul give me a pointer on how to solve a very perplexing problem? I've got a 4.7 STABLE machine that Galeon started crashing (core dumps on startup) about 3 weeks ago. Since then I've cvsup'd and made world 3 times, and did portupgrade each time. Today I deleted the Galeon port an

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > portupgrade -puf portupgrade > portupgrade -pufr png > portupgrade -pufr fontconfig > portupgrade -pufr libxml2 > portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu Interesting. I almost always user `portupgrade -rR foo' without other options.

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:47:51PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:37 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:49PM -0500, taxman wrote: > > > On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > > At the risk of being accused of a complainer. >

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: --- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: ... Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Well, If heard for years several committers criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla?? ..

Re: Looking for mail server tool recommendations

2003-03-02 Thread Anti
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 00:00:42 -0500 Jim Trigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:39:31PM -0600, Anti wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:18:16 -0500 > > Jim Trigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > things? Or is there another MTA that I'm failing to consider? > > > > courier-m

Re: OT: AGP Pro 8x Slot

2003-03-02 Thread Troy Ross
Brian Henning wrote: Hello- I just bought a new motherboard, the ASUS A7N8X (not deluxe). I want to use it for my new FBSD machine. I actually want to use my old graphics card (AOpen NVidia Riva TNT2 Model 64, 32MB, 4x AGP) in that machine for now because i don't want to buy a new graphics card. M

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:37 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:49PM -0500, taxman wrote: > > On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > At the risk of being accused of a complainer. > > > I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade,

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:33:49PM -0500, taxman wrote: > On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > At the risk of being accused of a complainer. > > I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have > > left me without a useable X system. > > Guess it is back

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-03-02 12:15, Daxbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've never submitted a pr, but I've written scripts for bulk web > submissions (GET and POST for load testing web apps). Did the > previous web pr-interface have any sort of verification proce

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:01 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: | On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: | > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: | > > Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release | > > compilable ports..especially for t

Áèçíåñ êóðñ äëÿ Âàñ, Âàøåé ñåìüè, ôèðìû U5NQD3QOV2

2003-03-02 Thread 095
Title: T I T L E Наверное не стоит говорить о том, насколько важно для путешествующего бизнесмена знать ежедневно используемый язык делового мира той страны, в которую он приехал, иначе добиться успеха практически невозможно.

Re: can't sshd into box

2003-03-02 Thread John Murphy
Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the >gateway FreeBSD box on the same home network. The gateway box properly >lists the new box in /etc/hosts. Each box can ping the other by name >and by ip. Bear in mind that (by default) yo

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 02 March 2003 12:01 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release > > > compilable ports..especially for the

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-02T20:51:43Z, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's a good idea, but wouldn't really have helped; the email addresses > concerned were "disposable" and all from various free webmail providers. Could you rate-limit the system to 'n' submissions from a given email address in a

Re: instant-workstation can't find ldes (for postfix)

2003-03-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Tom Parquette wrote: > >This is due to the upgrade of openssl. Have you tried cvsupping and > >retying? Most of the problems have already been fixed. If it > >persists, then please report which port was building when it failed > >(not instant-server, bu

Re: 5.0 and ACPI Errors:

2003-03-02 Thread John Murphy
"Lord Sith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Does anyone have a clue what this error means? > >acpi0: on motherboard >ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15 >Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fdf00 >acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model. >Timecount

Re: 5.0 and ACPI Errors:

2003-03-02 Thread taxman
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:34 pm, Lord Sith wrote: > Does anyone have a clue what this error means? not myself, but see what -current does on that machine. 5.0 is not production code yet. It is a static point along a rapidly moving devlopment branch. It's not expected to work in all cases.

Àíãëèéñêèé Ðàçãîâîðíûé ñ ïðåïîäàâàòåëÿìè èç ÑØÀ-ìûøëåíèå ïðîèçíîøåíèå ñòèëü ðå÷è hXe8H3tnTt

2003-03-02 Thread Öåíòð Àìåðèêàíñêîãî Àíãëèéñêîãî
Title: AMERICAN LANGUAGE CENTER AMERICANLANGUAGECENTERЦентр разговорного английского MEANS/CПОСОБЫ:  -Изучение использования идиом. -Обучение разговорной грамматике. -Совершенствование употребления предлогов. -Практика устойчивых выражений и фразео

Re: ADSL modem and Security

2003-03-02 Thread Kjell Midtseter
On Monday, 3 March 2003 at 9:08:18 +1300, Defryn, Guy wrote: > > Hi there, > > I am thinking about getting an ADSL connection and I would like to know > which (internal) ADSL modems work well with Freebsd. > > Although I have very good knowledge of NT I have decided to use a > Freebsd box to c

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2003-03-02 17:22, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So? Set your EDITOR environment variable to whatever you prefer > > and you won't have to deal with vi. > > I tried that with pico some years ago, but the result > was not nice. That's a problem of pico then. Pico does stupid

Âûñòàâêè, ÿðìàðêè Ãåðìàíèÿ

2003-03-02 Thread Êîìïàíèÿ «Âèçà Êîíêîðä»
ВИЗА КОНКОРДТУРИСТИЧЕСКАЯ КОМПАНИЯРоссия, Москва, 101000, Армянский пер., д.7Тел.(7-095)232-9600,232-6861. Факс(7-095)232-3603УВАЖАЕМЫЕ ДАМЫ И ГОСПОДА! Приносим свои извинения за время, потраченное Вами на чтение данной информации.Разрешите представить Вам в качестве потенциального партнера турист

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: ... > Or you could consider helping find a way to > re-enable > the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies > from > abusing it. > Well, If heard for years several committers criticising the whole PR system. Time for bugzilla?? ... > > You

Re: can't sshd into box

2003-03-02 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:56, Wayne wrote: > Dear FreeBSD, > > I have installed 5.0 into a new Dell. I have not set up anything > special yet (no firewall, no natd, etc.). > > I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the > gateway FreeBSD box on the same home netw

Re: Problem running jdk as a normal user

2003-03-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
3505002D7 > # > Abort trap (core dumped) > > > Any ideas of how to solve this? This came up on freebsd-ports recently, and I posted a message to -hackers about getting one of the patches floating around committed to the tree. See PR kern/40611 and http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getm

Re: problems

2003-03-02 Thread John Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Patryas) wrote: >I have 2 questions: > >One is when I installed Freebsd 5.0 from a DOS partition, it gave me an >error message: > >Error mounting /dev/adOs1 on /dist: >Operation not supported by device (19) After the kernel loads, you are given an option to load any add

Re: can't sshd into box

2003-03-02 Thread Daxbert
Quoting Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have installed 5.0 into a new Dell. I have not set up anything > special yet (no firewall, no natd, etc.). > > I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the > gateway FreeBSD box on the same home network. The gateway box pro

can't sshd into box

2003-03-02 Thread Wayne
Dear FreeBSD, I have installed 5.0 into a new Dell. I have not set up anything special yet (no firewall, no natd, etc.). I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the gateway FreeBSD box on the same home network. The gateway box properly lists the new box in /etc

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:17:21PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: > Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable > the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from > abusing it. > >> > >>Why not have a "pr-moderator" for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc

Problem running jdk as a normal user

2003-03-02 Thread André Ramos
Hi, I'm trying to run jdk in freebsd-4.7, I installed it from the ports (linux-sun-jdk-1.4.1_1) but I can't manage to run it as a normal user. I runs fine when I try to run it as root but as a normal user I always get this error: # # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error # Please report t

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread taxman
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > At the risk of being accused of a complainer. > I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have > left me without a useable X system. > Guess it is back to the CD's. > Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they

5.0 and ACPI Errors:

2003-03-02 Thread Lord Sith
Does anyone have a clue what this error means? acpi0: on motherboard ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15 Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fdf00 acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model. Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz ACPI-1287:

Re: portsman - need feedback and testers

2003-03-02 Thread taxman
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 03:11 pm, Anselm Garbe wrote: >a while ago I asked on this list, if someone knows an curses based > frontend for the FreeBSD ports collection, which behaves like a package > manager (e.g. dselect under Debian), but I got only responds, that this > does not yet exist

Re: Best way to log from several servers

2003-03-02 Thread Paidhi
Hi, > We have a few servers and we are getting tired of having to log into > each of them to check the logfile. (like tail -f /var/somelog) > > Is there a way to log things like /var/log/messages and > /var/log/maillog to one central logging server ? > > /thomas I use syslog-ng to do this for som

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Bill Moran
Ceri Davies wrote: Or you could consider helping find a way to re-enable the www to send-pr while preventing script kiddies from abusing it. Why not have a "pr-moderator" for each category (i386, kern, doc, etc), who approves each incoming PR. Basically this person would act as a front-line defens

Re: RFC 1912 compliant ISP's...

2003-03-02 Thread Bill Moran
Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: I was just tired of dealing with the simpletons... passwords can only be LC alpha and numerals, wrong MTA name in documentation, haven't answered my email in 3 days (not even an auto- responder...??) . And, I just signed up two weeks ago... I'm starting to feel li

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Daxbert
Quoting Matthew Emmerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming > > > >>the PR database. > > > > > > > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers > >

ADSL modem and Security

2003-03-02 Thread Defryn, Guy
Hi there, I am thinking about getting an ADSL connection and I would like to know which (internal) ADSL modems work well with Freebsd. Although I have very good knowledge of NT I have decided to use a Freebsd box to connect my network to the internet. I want host my own website and ftp. I o

Re: RFC 1912 compliant ISP's...

2003-03-02 Thread Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
From: "Giorgos Keramidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:03 PM Subject: Re: RFC 1912 compliant ISP's... > [ Top posting 'fixed'. ] > Thanks. Been talking to too many MS types lately... but in this c

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:58:58PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming > > > >>the PR database. > > > > > > > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:49:21PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release compilable > > ports..especially for the big mothers like X/KDE. > > I'm sure they do. However, they can't

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger
On Sunday 02 March 2003 02:22 pm, Cliff Sarginson wrote: | At the risk of being accused of a complainer.. | I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have | left me without a useable X system. | Guess it is back to the CD's. | Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure t

Re: The web-based bug interface is currently disabled.

2003-03-02 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:48:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > >>No, FreeBSD dislikes moronic skript kiddies spamming > > >>the PR database. > > > > > >OK, I'm screwed :(. It's difficult to find committers > > >interested in my ports (math/cad stuff) anyway. I > > >gu

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > Will the ports maintainers *please* make sure they release compilable > ports..especially for the big mothers like X/KDE. I'm sure they do. However, they can't test in your environment. The X ports built fine for me. I don't use

Re: Portupgrade -- revisited

2003-03-02 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:22:33PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > At the risk of being accused of a complainer.. > I will state here that my experiments in the use of portupgrade, have > left me without a useable X system. > Guess it is back to the CD's. > Will the ports maintainers *please* make

Re: a simple question about ports

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > > Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ? > > Lots of different reasons

  1   2   >