Check SG24-6266-01, although FICON there are ESCON references in there...
what Joel said
From: SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Tom Trainor thomas.j.trai...@exxonmobil.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:44 PM
Subject: CU Resources Exceeded
Al,
I would say that your assumption/impression is correct, at least in our case.
I run some for internal verification based on changes to our Plex, but have
been asked, within the last 18 months or so, for the Plex stuff more frequently
than in the past.
Regards,
Pat Falcone
We're doing this in a 7 way jes plex inside a bigger sysplex. The task can run
hot from time to time depending on load and does run with a mix of other
workloads. Works OK for us but I can't speak to the $$$ savings.
From: Bill Johnson mellonb...@yahoo.com
To:
Have you considered that the WLM CDS increased with z/OS 1.10
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r10.e0zm100/rwlmcds.htm
--- On Mon, 6/20/11, Sandro Ambrozic sandro.ambro...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sandro Ambrozic sandro.ambro...@gmail.com
Subject:
Hey Mark,
We have a fairly sizable plex and I try to report on as many as I can...some of
the sandbox stuff falls outside the plex. I've run the plex, MULC and SCRT
reports and am always told to include everything that I possibly can. So
typically I have a handful of sandbox LPAR's that have
Anyone have the answer to the above subject...we're thinking MVS/ESA 4.3 but
cannot confirm...
TIA...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
Where having an issue with Zeke on 1.9 with Zeke
Z17U8E Insufficient index data space storage
Any ideas...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Thanks Mike,
It appears there was a corruption issue with the catalog in question. I guess
the messaging was less elegant than we might have anticipated.
Appreciate your input...
--- On Sun, 9/12/10, Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
from: Mike Schwab mike.a.sch
We've had some lingering issues getting into the admin. console from the
application server we can't seem to get by. Can anyone kindly assist with
helping us understand where we may be going astray? We strongly believe that
this is ACF2 related...unfortunately it's on version 9.2 (unsupported)
OK, so who do we send our emails to to let IBM know that it's a dumb idea to
even consider discontinuing the Redbook Series? And should there be a generic
subject line that gets the attention of those individuals and hopefully
eliminates get washed in with all the other dirty laundry...
--- On
I think you're right on it Bob. And I totally agree that perspective comes into
play when looking at this, thanks.
For us taking delivery of WAS 3.02 back in 2001, as freeware if I remember
correctly, seemed like a prudent move to save work from continually going to
the other side.
We had a
Curious if anyone can shed light on the subject matter. We're taking the
default of 4 mb and want to increase to around 100 mb for the RID pool. It
appears in V7 the RID is allocated below the bar, in V8 it looks like the lists
part of the RID get moved above the bar.
Do we need to be
I saw a roadshow this past summer and immediately came away with the
implications to licensing. A small group of us also talked about what you do
below, IBM changing the licensing or breaking the software.
To me anyway, it's a crafty/risky move and left me feeling, no disrespect to
Neon
While I agree with what you are saying and being a very early WAS customer
there were also sometimes severe implications to performance *trying* to get
WAS to play nice with the traditional workloads. Something had to be done to
allow the 2, trad. workloads WebFear, to cohabitate...
--- On
countersues Neon over zPrime accelerator
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 3:34 PM
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:59:19 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
While I agree with what you are saying and being a very early WAS customer
there were also sometimes
...@zurichna.com wrote:
From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
Subject: Re: IBM countersues Neon over zPrime accelerator
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 5:40 PM
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:34:21 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Really
@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 9:04 PM
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:30:21 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
That's fine, I don't agree. Thanks for checking for the documentation.
You don't agree with what? That having 10 GPs has less overhead than
5 GPs and 5
, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Come on Mark, you made a blanket statement about zAAP's and performance and
I disagreed. Now you're coming back with specifics which I'm not going
to/can't argue. I'm just stating I've been in situations where I personally
believe that a zAAP would have
Werner,
I'm curious, how many CPU's?
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Werner Kuehnel werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de wrote:
From: Werner Kuehnel werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: WLM and TCPIP
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Friday, January 29, 2010, 2:30 PM
The normal delay
I've checked the archives, manuals but just can't seem to find an answer for
this.
Is there a way to find the amount allocated to HSA on the older machines?
TIA...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Well this tells me how many of what I can add to the HSA but I need to see how
much storage HSA has allocated on the machine. I would think that will come
from the HMC and some panel navigation.
It's a long story but I got burned recently trying to squeeze and need to
update my cheat sheet
You know what's entertaining searching the operating system command manual is
the different names for HSA, Hardware Storage Area, Hardware Systems Area. In
fact I thought it was Hardware Save Area
partial to Hardware Storage Area myself...
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, Ted MacNEIL
There was a push to get WebFear on the mainframe and when everyone wined about
the issues with Java sucking the life out of and the CPU off of the traditional
workloads something had to be done.
--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Bob Shannon bshan...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
From: Bob Shannon
Which Service Class takes the beating, the WLM managed one or the JES managed?
Yea, I don't understand why IBM took out MTTW save Dis.
--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com wrote:
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com
Subject: Re: WLM BATCH rules
To:
Personally, I would say that it depends. My last gig on a small 2-way I was
standing on my head with the Policy to make it work due to capacity
limitations. I had all kinds of stuff in IMP 1. Now I'm currently supporting a
very large plex with many disparate sizes, shapes, workloads. Some LPARs
Yea, it was always *storage creep* then we started running WAS 3.01 back in,
oh, 2001 or so and it became *storage leak* while on calls with IBM. So what
does that make it now, *storage creak*.
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Just to add to Al's nice list also search sysplex on redbooks and check
SG24-6485 on redbooks, it has some references to other manuals as well.
This is timely for me also as I need to, in the near future, look at some of
this as well at our site. Thanks.
--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Andrew Metcalfe
You probably have discretionary defined and the service class this job is
running in is over achieving, has a velocity of less than 30 or a response time
goal over 1 min. and is itself not resource capped and ends up giving resources
to discretionary but keeps the PI of the giver between 0.71
Hmmm, you're probably right.
John, go to the field descriptor and hit PF1 and you should get the description
for the field.
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com wrote:
From: Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com
Subject: Re: WLM question - delayed due to
- delayed due to CPUCAPPED
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 7:09 PM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Patrick Falcone
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject
Bob,
I understood what you meant. I was basically trying to get a feel for what the
different options implied, *none, *all, qualifying LPARs. My intention all
along has been to get this right. There's potentially too much at stake here to
get it wrong given the number of machines and LPARs.
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Falcone
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OS SCRT NO89 Product Information
I'm currently
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Falcone
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z/OS SCRT NO89 Product Information
I'm currently working with/on SCRT for quite
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Falcone
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 1:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS SCRT NO89 Product Information
Thanks for all your input. You'll have to excuse my ignorance with this stuff
since my main charge
I'm currently working with/on SCRT for quite a few physical machines and about
triple the amount of LPARs. Is there any easy way for me to find out what
products might be on what LPARs for inclusion in the NO89 section? I've got the
process working fine but now need to tailor the NO89 section
We had 3081's at a time share back in the mid 80's. At one point we took 2
3081G's and had IBM put them together to form a 3084 Q64 w/PIF.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
From: Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Subject: 308x Processors - was Mainframe
Correction they were 3081K 32's, one of the other posts jolted my memory back
into focus. Sorry for the drift.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: 308x Processors - was Mainframe articles
Hi Lizette,
We run HSM in STCMED with no issues in a large plex, a small plex and single
systems environment. HSM can consume a lot of resources but if your WLM policy
is sound and your workloads are happy then STCMED should suffice.
The system related companion tasks in SYSSTC are usually
I'm looking at an issue where a couple of quick running batch jobs, 1minute or
less, started and finished but CA7 does not have any indication that they
completed successfully. I'm still looking at this problem but don't have any
leads at this point. Anyone familiar with type anomalous event?
I'm looking at an issue where a couple of quick running batch jobs, 1minute or
less, started and finished but CA7 does not have any indication that they
completed successfully. I'm still looking at this problem but don't have any
leads at this point. Anyone familiar with type anomalous event?
What plex member did they convert on? Look at the plex member that was shutdown
and then brought back up temporarily without cairim you dummy. Never mind...
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Patrick Falcone patrick.falco...@verizon.net
Subject
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 6:51 PM
Patrick,
I appreciate the reply but I believe you have confused SMF70PMU with SMF70PMT.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Falcone
Sent: Tuesday, March
No, its an arbitrary number that has a maximum of 200 units which would be 20%
of a general purpose CP. This would be in relation to blocked workloads and how
much CP to give them to get them dispatched and serviced to possibly release
resources being held by the blocker.
--- On Tue, 3/31/09,
Just checking, is there any other way to change the LPAR weights other than HMC
or the Service Element? No system commands that I'm aware of that allow this,
correct?
TIA...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
Patrick Falcone
patrick.falcone7
@VERIZON.NET
Can't seem to find type 74(4) after adding a new member to the plex. Any not
obvious, or obvious, reasons? Seems to be in SMF/RMF.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
(@#*(*#E)!
Thanks Mark and yes, right on Skip.
From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
Subject: Re: No SMF 74(4)
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 4:39 PM
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:32:26 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Can't seem to find
Wouldn't hurt to check where OMPROUTE is in WLM. If it's set too low and the
LPAR gets busy it's possible you'll see 622 disconnects.
--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
Subject: Re: 3270 session disconnects
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
I understood the performance implications, this was basically a functional POC
and at this point I don't see us moving ahead on this type processor. The
2066-002, on the floor, was picked as a starting point.
I'm not involved in the haggling part of the process but I'm sure the necessary
Can someone, I the know, save me some look-up time and tell me if I can add an
IFL to a IBM 2066-002. My understanding is that this processor type comes with
2 spare CP's.
The question now becomes, is the 2066 still supported with regards to turning
on one of the spares as an IFL?
. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IBM 2066-002 Adding Spare CP as IFL
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 2:51 PM
Patrick Falcone wrote:
Can someone, I the know, save me some look-up time and tell me if I can
add an IFL to a IBM 2066-002. My understanding is that this processor
@bama.ua.edu
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 4:54 PM
I believe the document you are looking for is Announcement 905-220 from
October 2005:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/0/897/ENUS905-220/ENUS905-220.PDF
Brian
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:01:24 -0800, Patrick Falcone wrote:
Thanks Radoslaw.
I
Hopefully you get what storage you need contiguous or it's not just an IPL
anymore..I got bit by this just last week.
--- On Tue, 11/25/08, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Add Storage To Lpar - z/800
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
] On Behalf Of
Patrick Falcone
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SRB Wait JWT
While I don't believe that this is true can someone confirm. If a task goes
into some sort of SRB wait, no time is also accrued to the JWT timer making
these wait types
While I don't believe that this is true can someone confirm. If a task goes
into some sort of SRB wait, no time is also accrued to the JWT timer making
these wait types mutually exclusive. Do I have this right or am I all wet? I
would think that if you did hit the JWT limit, set at several
Have a look at the below link.
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100258
--- On Mon, 9/22/08, Walter Marguccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Walter Marguccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: z890 model upgrade
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008,
I'll keep at it, CPU optimization, depending on size environment and where I
draw the line with regards to payback. There are almost always tuning
opportunities with regards to CPU. At my last client I would have been happy to
get a few percent back since I knew we were not getting an upgrade
Not sure you want to lock them. There are a variety of switch covers available.
We had some of them at my last site. Google IBM power switch covers. Datacover
might have what you are looking for. These usually prevent your oops! scenario.
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was asked
A recent interview I had with a large financial institution, east coast, came
from the fact that they were going to a GDPS, *geographically dispersed
personnel support* structure. The support team was somewhat duplicated at a
different site located about 300 hundred miles away.
What I
A bit late on this, was sunning and funning, am I allowed to do this
unemployed? But really, I totally agree with these sentiments. While I didn't
like working myself out of a job just before the outsourcing I figured I might
as well make it work, it kept me busy, and in the end I felt true to
Have you had any microcode put on the VTS lately?
Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I worked with my CE on this. IBM
Tucson dialed into the VTS and was able to reset the error flags and put the
tape in READ status. I can now access the files on the back end (physical)
tape. The CE
Hi Gary,
We had a similar problem back at my last place and *sucks the life out of the
machine* is about right.
Sounds like it could be a storage leak/creep within the heap that is causing
the Java heap to go into more frequent garbage collections, especially if the
heap is lightly
I agree and out of pure morbid curiosity, at this point, did you happen to
issue a 'D GRS,C'? And if so did Latch Number 87 come back, a quiesce latch for
a zFS file system. Just curious if other zFS support may be lacking..
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:55:16 -0700, Patrick Falcone
wrote:
I agree and out of pure morbid curiosity, at this point, did you happen to
issue a 'D GRS,C'? And if so did Latch Number 87 come back, a quiesce latch
for a zFS file system. Just curious if other zFS support may be lacking
You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be 'quiesced'
instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon the below.
'D OMVS,F,e' where 'e' is exception.
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:12:50 -0700, Patrick Falcone
wrote:
Hi Mark
, Patrick Falcone
wrote:
You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be
'quiesced' instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon the below.
'D OMVS,F,e' where 'e' is exception.
Yes I tried that (I did look at the FM before my first post on this subject).
Would you expect
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned/considered but did you try 'D OMVS,F'?
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just called about a problem on our WAS development LPAR that turned
out to be a quiesced WAS config ZFS. Much to my dismay, there is no operator
command I can
Hi Anton,
At my prior gig we had North American, mostly CST and some EST zone work and
a UK workload. I supported one WLM policy. The workloads were grouped as usual,
prod onlines, prod batch, test onlines, test batch, etc I had CICS, IDMS,
Adabas, Complete, WAS, Domino, TSO. You get
Does SC34-4817-07 help?
George Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been searching hi and low for
any information on FLMALLOC which
controls the JCL that's submitted to move things around in preparation
for a promotion. Does anyone know where I can find this macro so I can
change it to use
Curious to know what kind of database.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I utilized RMFWDM and did not
find anything of importance; our MIH (Missing
Interrupt Handler) is set at
MIH DEV=(3E0-3E7),TIME=10:00
we attempted to cancel the job several times and finally forced it out of the
I've heard that, DASD is a premium, before. See if *they* can provide him with
how much the other side uses. I know, I know, it won't do any good. Been there
too.
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mean they will have to do a, shudder, CBA! Oh the humanity...
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Falcone
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sounds like it's waiting for or delayed by something. Do you have a monitor
that can show wait or delay reasons?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone ran into this
problem or can you tell me where to look for a
possible resolution.
Running z/OS release 1.7.
Payroll jobs
We did this, long ago far away, at our time share NVIP, IBM 3880-11 w/3350's.
I'm with you on this Ted, I always liked to keep this, paging environment,
simple as possible with paging with own volume. This may be a bit of old school
thinking but when there are problems or potential data
Well, I like the resource group solution but I have to wonder how well STCLOW
does normally with a vel = 50 at imp. 4. I might think that this is a never
achieving goal service class from all of what might be in STCLOW, but of course
I could be way wrong too.
I'd resource cap max it, CD,
Yes, no difference in importance or goal since SYSSTC is *hardwired* at FE
which is where TCPIP lives.
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, All,
In preparation for z/OS 1.9 (currently on 1.7), we're fledging the
tn3270 server from the TCPIP nest to its own address space. TCPIP
currently
much snipped below
Hi Jim,
Which was one of the reasons I questioned Barbara about having NDM in
discretionary. The 25 seconds would have been at least 2 WLM adjustments but on
a potentially fully loaded LPAR I'm wondering if there is something that alerts
WLM/SRM to make a
Hi Barbara,
I might consider moving NDM up in importance, middle level, to get it some
resources. I might also watch its behavior as NDM has been known to take
resources that might affect other workloads. If that's the case you might
consider resource capping it as well.
Barbara
I choked on my coffee this morning, ROTFLMAO. I just hope the MF in the post
below meant MainFrame. Sorry, I just could not resist.
Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the main page
(http://www.mfnetdisk.com) I clicked on the free
link then on the link that says Free Movie Tutorial
Makes me wonder if anything unusual is returned from $D PERFDATA or MASDEF with
regards to this *feature* mod.
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:47:59 -0700,
Edward Jaffe
wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:27:11 -0400, Craddock, Chris
wrote:
Yes the
It's not too faded Ted. And yes, Walsh.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/mktsupport/techdocs/allreal_v11.pdf
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that ESQA will just overflow into ECSA is there any real reason not to
allocate ESQA fairly low so that it is always at 100%, and
This kind of also ties into the *gas gauge* available for z9 with driver
upgrade. I thought this little pdf interesting.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/systems/z/pdf/z9_Gas_Gauge_Driver_manual.pdf
under
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/advantages/energy/index.html
Timothy Sipples
Google IBM z9 cooling. Also check out
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/511/harrer.pdf. The z9 has a MRU,
modular refrigeration unit.
Joel M Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What safety guards are there on z9bc
hardware to prevent over-heating?
(Such as when the building's coolers are
Does this work for you?
http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a1310xx.pdf
Carmelo Grecia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Does anybody here have a copy of the IBM RAMAC 9390-001 service guide?
Regards,
Carmelo Grecia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Regards,
Patrick Falcone
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the monthly
increase
To be precise, it appears that the savings are actually as a result of RSM
modifications in z/OS 1.8, carried forward, not z/OS 1.9. Sorry bout that.
Patrick Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John,
You *may* actually save some CPU with regards to other system related overhead
associated
I can relate and sympathize with John on this. A while back I was asked to work
with the installation team to *shoehorn* WAS V5 onto a G5 in 31 with 2 LPAR's,
1 sandbox/1 production/dev. The prod/dev. LPAR had 2.4 GB w/1.7 cs and .7 es.
The machine was already running at 100% with latent
Jeez John, I'd rather do the proof of concept on the current setup, WLM prior
to plex, than go to a setup, plex, that could cause additional degradation and
then maybe have to go back but I guess that's all water under the bridge at
this point.
I know I'm preaching to the choir but don't
And z/OS 1.4 has been out of support for a while unless you're paying through
the nose for continued support as we were. Are you in 31 or 64? We had a
problem, in a simple monoplex, going from 31 to 64 in z/OS 1.4 with a 3rd party
product doing some nasty things in storage.
Bu Dante [EMAIL
Don't know too much about portmap but it seems like a candidate for SYSSTC.
Have you encountered problems that make you reluctant to put it there.
Check the link. IBM's sample policy has it defined there.
Thanks Phil,
I like the following Users will no longer give up memory for HSA (hardware
storage area). I was crowing about this when the z800/z900's came out and was
told we would need to allocate 1GB of 8GB's for HSA.
Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going to be more fun, I
Probably due to the fact that the NT Unix guys get another box when they ask
for one without much questioning. You're dealing with with single
application/single server mentality.
I did a tuning exercise of a Domino Change Management application (non mail
server application) running on
Better to check the agreement very thoroughly. I would want to know, before
signing, what is covered *after* the contract has been signed. You might be
surprised at what you'll be paying for a few weeks down the road after the
contract has been signed and you need *x* to be investigated,
If you've done some meticulous work on your WLM policy with regards to defining
Report Service Classes you can indeed get the necessary, task or address space,
information from the SMF type 72 record or stock CMF / RMF Workload Activity
Report.
RMF Monitor 2 or 3 can show you what is asid is
showed up at home with
*the junk*.
Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like the old NVIP site...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick Falcone
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
there. That was when they were owned by a
porno house on the left coast. (or so we were told)
Met an IBM PSR there and she was one of the smarted people I ever met in the
business.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick Falcone
We had fail-over to battery then to diesel. You could hear the turbines on the
Pa. turnpike a couple hundred meters prior to the Philly exit eastbound. I just
googled and it looks like anywhere from 4 - 6 ms.
Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: its been an interesting discussion.
Thanks all
Yes, I don't know all the particulars but our support group's LAN had a
mainframe attached printer, IBM IP 1140, defined to it to do just what you are
asking. I'm sure someone will chime in with more definitive setup requirements.
Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was asked this
Hi Lizette,
Have a look at the RMF User's Guide, sc33-7990-10. Check IEFPARM DD statement
for instream support for what you are looking for below.
Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Listers -
I have been hunting through the RMF manuals (z/OS V1.7) and cannot seem to find
any
Yea, I mean there are all kinds of *cheats* in video games and to think there
are none in z/OS or any of the other companion products? I ran across this a
few years back at a class where an optimization parameter was discussed. When I
got back to the shop and tried to track it down it ended
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
