from:"Daniel"


Hi,

I'm a new user to RB. I submitted a cr request, published it, and
someone gave me some comments. I took some of those and updated my
working copy. Then submitted an update diff (using post-review -r
number). Is there a way to see the changes I made after between the
two submits? This would be a really great feature to have, and I'd be
surprised if it weren't there.

Daniel

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: diff between updates?


Thanks. One of my colleagues showed me that after I sent this message.
Unfortunately, I ran into problems with some files. As best as I can
figure, those files files either:
  1. had no diff between r1 and r2, or
  2. there was a diff between base and r2 but no diff between base and
r1.
We're using an older version of RB (I'm told it was installed in Dec),
so upgrading will probably fix the problem.

On Jul 14, 2:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Click View Diff. There should be a list of revisions posted. The second row
 is for showing differences between two revisions (the current one and
 whichever one you select).

 These can be commented on like normal diffs.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Wong allyourc...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

  I'm a new user to RB. I submitted a cr request, published it, and
  someone gave me some comments. I took some of those and updated my
  working copy. Then submitted an update diff (using post-review -r
  number). Is there a way to see the changes I made after between the
  two submits? This would be a really great feature to have, and I'd be
  surprised if it weren't there.

  Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

No evolution required.


Hi,

I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do sudo rb-site
upgrade path, nothing seems to happen:

$ sudo rb-site upgrade .
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database
Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
packages/Re
viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
No evolution required.

I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
help, because beta still appears next to the logo when I visit the
site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
site upgrade?

Thanks,

Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: No evolution required.


Thanks Christian. Can you explain what my link is describing and how
that's different from yours?

On Jul 14, 3:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 The docs you want to start with are:

 http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/upgrad...

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Wong allyourc...@gmail.com wrote:

  I didn't run that command. The docs say I should run rb-site upgrade:

 http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/sites/upgrading-sites/

  Are the docs wrong? If both of them are for doing different things,
  I'm afraid I don't understand your explanation.

  On Jul 14, 3:08 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
   Did you run:

   easy_install -U ReviewBoard

   ? This will actually install the new software. rb-site upgrade just
  upgrades
   the site for the new version.

   Christian

   --
   Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
   Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
   VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

   On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Wong allyourc...@gmail.com
  wrote:

Hi,

I want to upgrade our install of RB, but when I do sudo rb-site
upgrade path, nothing seems to happen:

$ sudo rb-site upgrade .
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database
Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-
packages/Re
viewBoard-1.0alpha2-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
No evolution required.

I've tried restarting memcached and apache, but that doesn't seem to
help, because beta still appears next to the logo when I visit the
site, and I'm assuming rb-site upgrade would try to get me version
1.0, which isn't beta. Do I need to do something in addition to rb-
site upgrade?

Thanks,

Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

djblet media files not found

2009-08-15 Thread Daniel Wong


I've checked out a copy of rb from svn so I can develop some features
in rb. Unfortunately, I'm am running into problems with the devserver
not being able to find djblet media files such as jquery.gravy.js. I'm
guessing I'm missing some kind of config that tells the server where
to look for these files, because I see them in my site-packages dir of
my Python install and I can import djblets from a normal Python shell.

My dev OS is Windows XP pro, which means I can't run devserver.sh
directly. The way I'm doing it is by copying the one line out of the
file and prepending it with python  before running it in cmd.

Help?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: RBTools Bazaar support (was: RBTools 0.3 released)

2011-03-09 Thread Daniel Benamy

Sorry to bug you, but I'm really looking forward to bazaar support.
Any idea when this will be released or even just committed? I'd try
out unreleased code to use it.

Thanks so much for your awesome work. Reviewboard is great!

Dan

On Jan 30, 3:31 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Julian,

 There are patches for Bazaar and Darcs that need to go in. We'll still
 get them in, but due to the removal of the old API in 1.6, we had to
 cut a release now. We'll go through and do another round of reviews
 and start getting ready to cut a release once those are in.

 Christian









 On Sunday, January 30, 2011, Julian Mehnle jul...@mehnle.net wrote:
  Christian Hammond wrote:

  RBTools 0.3 has been released. There's a list of what's changed, and
  some important notes for people with mod_wsgi configurations, on the
  news page below.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/01/30/rbtools-0-3-released/

  Great work!

  However, I'm wondering about Bazaar (bzr) support.  I managed to generally
  get it working by applying the patch posted in

    http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=773 AKA
    http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1739/

  to RBTools 0.2 with some manual fiddling and using the regexp adjustment
  described in review #1739.

  Whom can I work with to get this into RBTools proper?

  -Julian

 --
 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board accepted to Google Summer of Code 2011 - Looking for mentors/ideas

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Benamy

I'll suggest finishing bazaar support in post-review although there
may not be that much work left there.

Dan

On Mar 21, 4:19 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hey everyone,

 We've been accepted again this year in Google's Summer of Code, a yearly
 event where students from around the world participate in open source
 projects, developing work experience and getting paid for it.

 We're expecting about 4 or 5 students this year, but we can grow that number
 with more mentors.

 I'd like to see if there are any past contributors to Review Board who know
 the codebase well enough and would like to mentor a student or two this
 year. It's a great way to benefit the project.

 A mentor's job is to assist the student in his development, answer questions
 (forwarding on to us when needed), and to help collect status and run the
 weekly meetings. They're also expected to grade the students half-way
 through the Summer and at the end.

 We're also looking for ideas for projects, so if you have an idea for
 something awesome you'd like to see, just reply :)

 Thanks!

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Bzr support in post-review

2011-06-25 Thread Daniel Benamy

Hi,

Adding bzr support to post-review seems to be in limbo. There's a
patch for it at
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1739/
and a thread about it at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/888a492465ded9/b42a2ec7bcc7e6c8?lnk=gstq=dbenamy#b42a2ec7bcc7e6c8

There's a comment in the review that says that changing the regex to
BRANCH_REGEX = r'\w*(branch|branch root): (?Pbranch_path.+)$'
makes it work. That regex matches the output of my bzr info too and
I think I saw one or two comments on other lists of it working for
people but it was a while ago.

Is there anything holding up the merging of that patch + new regex?

Thanks!
Dan

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Bzr support in post-review

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Benamy

Hi Christian,

I can spend a little time working on the patch and testing. I'm not
bzr expert, but I use it daily. Would that be ok?

Who needs to do the full review?

Do you know when the freeze should be done? Ie, when should I poke at
this issue again?

Thanks!
Dan

On Jun 26, 3:37 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Dan,

 We need to do a full review and make sure it's suitable. I don't know if the
 original author is still around (there weren't any updates made after the
 current reviews), but we'd need someone familiar with bzr to help finish up
 any changes and test them.

 Right now, we're freezing RBTools while some restructuring work finishes up
 in a branch. It's too tedious to keep things in sync right now. Once that
 work is in, we can start accepting patches again.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Benamy dben...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,

  Adding bzr support to post-review seems to be in limbo. There's a
  patch for it at
 http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1739/
  and a thread about it at

 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/888a4...

  There's a comment in the review that says that changing the regex to
  BRANCH_REGEX = r'\w*(branch|branch root): (?Pbranch_path.+)$'
  makes it work. That regex matches the output of my bzr info too and
  I think I saw one or two comments on other lists of it working for
  people but it was a while ago.

  Is there anything holding up the merging of that patch + new regex?

  Thanks!
  Dan

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Bzr support in post-review

2011-08-18 Thread Daniel Benamy

Now that 0.3.3 is out, would this work be merged if it was fixed up?

On Jun 26, 3:37 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Dan,

 We need to do a full review and make sure it's suitable. I don't know if the
 original author is still around (there weren't any updates made after the
 current reviews), but we'd need someone familiar with bzr to help finish up
 any changes and test them.

 Right now, we're freezing RBTools while some restructuring work finishes up
 in a branch. It's too tedious to keep things in sync right now. Once that
 work is in, we can start accepting patches again.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Benamy dben...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,

  Adding bzr support to post-review seems to be in limbo. There's a
  patch for it at
 http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1739/
  and a thread about it at

 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/888a4...

  There's a comment in the review that says that changing the regex to
  BRANCH_REGEX = r'\w*(branch|branch root): (?Pbranch_path.+)$'
  makes it work. That regex matches the output of my bzr info too and
  I think I saw one or two comments on other lists of it working for
  people but it was a while ago.

  Is there anything holding up the merging of that patch + new regex?

  Thanks!
  Dan

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

post-receive hook for Reviewboard?

2011-11-06 Thread Daniel Dieckmann

Hey,

I installed ReviewBoard a couple of days ago and now I am wondering
if there is any possibility to make a post-receive hook in a git repo,
that creates a new review request.

So I want to do something like this:
1. Someone writes some code an does a commit. Now he pushes this
one to the server where ReviewBoard is running and which also has
a clone of the original git repo.
2. After the push there is some post-receive hook creating a new
review
request using post-review.

But none of my solutions worked, have zou any idea how to solve this
problem?

Thanks in advance,
Daniel

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Can Connect SVN Repository thru proxy

2012-06-20 Thread Daniel Etchen

Hi all,

We're using Review Board 1.6.4.1.
We access a Subversion server thru a proxy which is configured in /
root/.subversion/servers.
The 'svn info http://svn.foo.com:8080/repos/3845' command return a
correct response.

But when we try to create a new repository in reviewboard, the server
kicks back an error:
2012-06-20 09:34:08,240 - ERROR - SVN: Failed to get repository
information for http://svn.foo.com:8080/repos/3845: OPTIONS of 'http://
svn.foo.com:8080/repos/3845': Could not resolve hostname
`svn.foo.com': Host not found (http://svn.foo.com:8080)

Where is the problem ? It seems that the proxy configuration
configured in /root/.subversion/servers is not read by reviewboard

Thank you for your help.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

rb-site help

2012-06-28 Thread Daniel Laird

Hi,

I am going to use rb-site to dump the data and then import onto a new 
webserver.
Whilst trying to check out the options I noticed that when I do rb-site -h 
there is no help regarding the manage options.
I am going to check the source code - but is this intentional or just an 
oversight?

Cheers
Dan

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Post-Review and Non publically accessible repositories

2012-06-29 Thread Daniel Laird

I am using post-review to generate my diff requests and post them to my 
reviewboard instance.
One of my SVN servers has restricted access, as such I mark it as non 
publically accessible and add all the Users /Groups that can access it.
The problem is when I run post-review it fails to find the repo and I get 
an error that the repo is not accessible.

However if I make it publically accessible it all works fine.
It seems to be a problem where post-review does not do any authentication 
until after it has tried to locate the repo - but this wont work.

Has anyone else seen the same issue and if so did you solve it OR is this a 
bigger problem in post-review that will take some hacking or should I not 
be doing this.

Cheers
Dan

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-08-03 Thread Daniel Laird

I have tried to install this release.
I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by 
specifying -f to easy_install.
Onc done I then did 
rb-site upgrade /path/my/site

This took a while and generated the following:
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
Adding baseline version for new models
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)

Evolution successful.
Resetting in-database caches.
Upgrade complete.

The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images)
has changed. You will need to make manual changes to 
your web server configuration.

For Apache, you will need to add:

Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static

For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url:

/static = /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static

Once you have made these changes, type the following 
to resolve this:

$ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan resolve-check 
static-media

I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias.  
However did that and then ran the command specified.

I then restarted memcached and apache.
However I now get a splash screen that says:

*Manual server updates required
 **A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. 
 After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
 **If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
 list.*


But I have done this:
It also says:

*Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This 
 directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files.
 **Your extensions media directory is currently at: 
 /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
 **Permission problems
 **The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac, 
 you can fix this by typing:
 **$ sudo chown -R www-data 
 /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
 **On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership to 
 www-data.*

 
But I have also checked this.
Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further?
Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site commands:

 */usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
  
 DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES 
 instead.
 **  DeprecationWarning*


I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board 
 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but 
 rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/

 Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta, so 
 use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing would 
 definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a higher-quality 
 release.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

2012-08-07 Thread Daniel Laird

I checked permissions - it turned out that ext had permissions of 755 and
infact needs 775 as the user is in group www-data but the www-data needs w
access to ext.
Perhaps that could be added to the debug message to help other people who
make the same mistake as me.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, August 3, 2012 7:49:01 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:

Hi Daniel,

The CACHE_* warnings you get are harmless. Just new APIs in Django we have
to migrate to.

We can't detect the config file location. The user may be using our
auto-generated ones, or they may have copied/pasted into their Apache
configuration. There's no way for us to know.

So I wasn't completely sure, but did you create the ext directory and set
the ownership on it? Can you show me a ls -ld of that directory? That
should be the last thing you'd need to configure.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird
daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com wrote:

I have tried to install this release.
I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by
specifying -f to easy_install.
Onc done I then did
rb-site upgrade /path/my/site

This took a while and generated the following:
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
Adding baseline version for new models
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)

Evolution successful.
Resetting in-database caches.
Upgrade complete.

The location of static media files (CSS, JavaScript, images)
has changed. You will need to make manual changes to
your web server configuration.

For Apache, you will need to add:

Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static

For lighttpd, add the following to alias.url:

/static = /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/static

Once you have made these changes, type the following
to resolve this:

$ rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan
resolve-check static-media

I think the help could tell you which conf file to update with the Alias.

However did that and then ran the command specified.

I then restarted memcached and apache.
However I now get a splash screen that says:

*Manual server updates required
**A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server.
After these changes are made, you should restart your server.
**If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our
mailing list.*

But I have done this:
It also says:

*Your site's extensions media directory isn't properly set up. This
directory is where Review Board will store various extension media files.
**Your extensions media directory is currently at:
/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
**Permission problems
**The directory must be writable by the web server. On Linux/Unix/Mac,
you can fix this by typing:
**$ sudo chown -R www-data
/var/www/reviewboard-satv.tandbergtv.lan/htdocs/media/ext
**On Windows, right-click the data directory and change the ownership
to www-data.*

But I have also checked this.
Have you got any logging I can try and turn on to debug further?
Finally I am also getting a lot of these when running any rb-site
commands:

*/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.1-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:

DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use settings.CACHES
instead.
** DeprecationWarning*

I am running on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit Server.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, August 3, 2012 9:49:58 AM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:

Hey everyone,

I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review Board
1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this release, but
rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news post.

http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/08/03/review-board-**
17-beta-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/08/03/review-board-17-beta-1-released/

Please let me know if you hit any problems. And remember, it's a beta,
so use your best judgment when deciding where to deploy it. Any testing
would definitely be helpful, though, as that will help ensure a
higher-quality release.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

SVN 1.7 support

2012-08-23 Thread Daniel Laird

Has anyone managed to patch or modify reviewboard so that diffs generated 
under SVN 1.7 actually work with post-review and ReviewBoard?

The upgrade to SVN is about to hit my department and it will be a shame to 
stop reviewing code as a result of this change

Dan

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!

2012-11-30 Thread Daniel Laird

Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
One question I have is about RBTools?

I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same 
time?

Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the 
RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later)

Cheers
Dan

On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get 
 this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some 
 production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was 
 worth the wait :)

 There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface 
 changes in this release.

 See the news and release notes for more information.

 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/

 We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. 
 Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made 
 until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

rb-extension-pack - installation and usage?

2012-12-21 Thread Daniel Laird

I just found this pack of extensions and saw the XML Review Extension.
However there is little explaining what this does or how it enhances the 
process of reviewing XML.
Can anyone tell me what it adds? I thought I had installed it properly and 
then looked at a review with XML files and noted nothing different.

Cheers
Dan


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-22 Thread Daniel Laird

I have downloaded and installed it - I have then pointed it at my company 
server.
But it just spins - with the busy icon.

Does it require anonymous access or anything as it does not seem to be 
asking for username/password?

Dan

On Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:15:31 AM UTC+1, Kirollos Risk wrote:

 Hey everyone!

 Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:

 *Features:*

- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether 
they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
- Configurable via the settings page


 *Screenshots:*



 https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png














































 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png










































 You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn

 - Kiro



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-23 Thread Daniel Laird

I am logged into Reviewboard via Chome but still getting the spinning icon 
- is there a way to find out which cookie file its using?

Dan

On Monday, April 22, 2013 9:17:00 PM UTC+1, Kirollos Risk wrote:

 Ah, once installed and opened, it uses the the appropriate Review Board 
 cookie.

 If it spins indefinitely, it may mean that you haven't logged in to Review 
 Board, thus the authentication cookie isn't set.  

 Currently, you *cannot* log in via the extension itself (I am working on 
 that).

 - Kiro


 On Monday, 22 April 2013 08:56:14 UTC-7, Daniel Laird wrote:

 I have downloaded and installed it - I have then pointed it at my company 
 server.
 But it just spins - with the busy icon.

 Does it require anonymous access or anything as it does not seem to be 
 asking for username/password?

 Dan

 On Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:15:31 AM UTC+1, Kirollos Risk wrote:

 Hey everyone!

 Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:

 *Features:*

- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether 
they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
- Configurable via the settings page


 *Screenshots:*



 https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-JIBwdna5Pso/UXHMoITr7eI/G0o/3QNhzGqN1po/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+3.54.03+PM.png














































 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Lz-NmhJCzPA/UXHNSGlCA7I/G04/fB8AWAAchRU/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-04-19+at+4.03.15+PM.png










































 You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn

 - Kiro



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

myisam or innodb ?

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Kelly

This is probably a Django issue, but if I'm using mysql, should my tables 
be in innodb format or myisam?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

How can I remove an extension?

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Kelly

I tried and failed to install the ascii art shipit extension.

2013-06-10 18:41:31,649 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:41:36,053 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:42:51,401 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:43:53,995 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:44:15,601 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:46:30,115 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:46:31,594 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:46:36,524 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:47:52,215 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
2013-06-10 18:48:54,037 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension

any idea how to remove it?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: How can I remove an extension?

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Kelly



 Extensions should be disabled from within the API before uninstalling from
 the filesystem. We should make this more bullet-proof though, maybe disable
 if it's not found.

 Are you still able to use RB?


RB works fine


 Is it just spewing logs?


Yes


 If so, go into the admin UI - Database - Extensions, find the ascii art
 extension, and disable it from there.


It's not listed.
According to that, there are no extensions registered


On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Daniel Kelly arrays.tostr...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I tried and failed to install the ascii art shipit extension.

 2013-06-10 18:41:31,649 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:41:36,053 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:42:51,401 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:43:53,995 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:44:15,601 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:46:30,115 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:46:31,594 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:46:36,524 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:47:52,215 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension
 2013-06-10 18:48:54,037 - ERROR -  - Error loading extension
 shipit_ascii_art_extension: No module named
 shipit_ascii_art_extension.extension

 any idea how to remove it?


 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: How can I remove an extension?

2013-06-10 Thread Daniel Kelly

No that's not it.  I've rebooted this box (  a VM ) multiple times since
the problem started happening.


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:

 On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Daniel Kelly arrays.tostr...@gmail.com
 wrote:


 Extensions should be disabled from within the API before uninstalling
 from the filesystem. We should make this more bullet-proof though, maybe
 disable if it's not found.

 Are you still able to use RB?


 RB works fine


  Is it just spewing logs?


 Yes


 If so, go into the admin UI - Database - Extensions, find the ascii art
 extension, and disable it from there.


 It's not listed.
 According to that, there are no extensions registered


 Try reloading Apache. There may just be other threads that still think it
 should be there.

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Error with home directory path expansion when using rbt?

2013-06-11 Thread Daniel Kan

New user to ReviewBoard here. Great tool with an intuitive interface, 
thanks for your efforts! Recently, one of my users was using 'rbt' from 
RBTools 0.5.1 and noticed that it would not accept '~' in the value for 
--diff-filename. My guess was that rbt does not run os.path.expanduser on 
the value, so I modified rbtools/commands/post.py with the following:
--- orig/rbtools/commands/post.py   2013-05-30 00:36:44.0 -0700
+++ RBTools-0.5.1.1-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py  2013-06-11 
15:33:05.449908000 -0700
@@ -455,8 +455,11 @@
 diff = sys.stdin.read()
 else:
 try:
-diff_path = os.path.join(origcwd,
- self.options.diff_filename)
+if (self.options.diff_filename.startswith('~')):
+   diff_path = 
os.path.expanduser(self.options.diff_filename)
+else:
+diff_path = os.path.join(origcwd,
+ 
self.options.diff_filename)
 fp = open(diff_path, 'r')
 diff = fp.read()
 fp.close()

My question is, is this sufficient to fix the problem or are there more 
places where I need to run expanduser? Also, although debug output 
indicates that it is unable to open the file, running rbt in normal mode is 
silent about not being able to find the difffile. Thanks!!!

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

2013-09-24 Thread Daniel Kan

I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been 
working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism 
no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that 
there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search 
anonymously for the user before attempting to bind. The LDAP server in my 
environment is set up to not return any results to anonymous queries and so 
the authentication attempt fails. Is there a reason this was changed? 
Thanks!!!

In an attempt to preserve the existing behavior of doing an anonymous 
search but then attempting a bind as a specific user if the anonymous 
search returns nothing, I made the following change which works for me:
--- reviewboard/accounts/backends.py.orig   2013-09-24 
16:18:47.0 -0700
+++ reviewboard/accounts/backends.py2013-09-24 16:20:01.0 -0700
@@ -210,7 +210,10 @@
 search = ldapo.search_s(settings.LDAP_BASE_DN,
 ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,
 uid)
-userbinding = search[0][0]
+   if (len(search)  0):
+   userbinding = search[0][0]
+   else:
+   userbinding=','.join([uid,settings.LDAP_BASE_DN])
 ldapo.bind_s(userbinding, password)
 
 return self.get_or_create_user(username, None, ldapo)

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

2013-10-15 Thread Daniel Kan

David,
  Sure, although I'm not sure how to post a bare diff there without 
specifying a repository. Is that possible? Thanks!

On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:43:43 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Would you mind submitting your change to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ?

 Thanks!
 -David


 On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Kan danie...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been 
 working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism 
 no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that 
 there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search 
 anonymously for the user before attempting to bind. The LDAP server in my 
 environment is set up to not return any results to anonymous queries and so 
 the authentication attempt fails. Is there a reason this was changed? 
 Thanks!!!

 In an attempt to preserve the existing behavior of doing an anonymous 
 search but then attempting a bind as a specific user if the anonymous 
 search returns nothing, I made the following change which works for me:
 --- reviewboard/accounts/backends.py.orig   2013-09-24 
 16:18:47.0 -0700
 +++ reviewboard/accounts/backends.py2013-09-24 16:20:01.0 
 -0700
 @@ -210,7 +210,10 @@
  search = ldapo.search_s(settings.LDAP_BASE_DN,
  ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,
  uid)
 -userbinding = search[0][0]
 +   if (len(search)  0):
 +   userbinding = search[0][0]
 +   else:
 +   userbinding=','.join([uid,settings.LDAP_BASE_DN])
  ldapo.bind_s(userbinding, password)
  
  return self.get_or_create_user(username, None, ldapo)

 -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Change in LDAP authentication behavior in 1.7.14 breaks environments that don't allow anonymous searches

2013-11-14 Thread Daniel Kan

David,
  Sorry for the massive delay! I've finally posted it at 
https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/4953/.

On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:51:59 AM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Daniel,

 I'd suggest making a quick clone of the reviewboard repository, making 
 your change, and then posting your diff against the reviewboard repository 
 by either creating a diff manually (git diff --full-index) or using rbt 
 post.

 -David


 On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Kan danie...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 David,
   Sure, although I'm not sure how to post a bare diff there without 
 specifying a repository. Is that possible? Thanks!


 On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:43:43 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Would you mind submitting your change to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/?

 Thanks!
 -David


 On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Kan danie...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been 
 working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism 
 no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that 
 there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search 
 anonymously for the user before attempting to bind. The LDAP server in my 
 environment is set up to not return any results to anonymous queries and 
 so 
 the authentication attempt fails. Is there a reason this was changed? 
 Thanks!!!

 In an attempt to preserve the existing behavior of doing an anonymous 
 search but then attempting a bind as a specific user if the anonymous 
 search returns nothing, I made the following change which works for me:
 --- reviewboard/accounts/backends.py.orig   2013-09-24 
 16:18:47.0 -0700
 +++ reviewboard/accounts/backends.py2013-09-24 16:20:01.0 
 -0700
 @@ -210,7 +210,10 @@
   search = ldapo.search_s(settings.LDAP_BASE_DN,
  ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,
  uid)
 -userbinding = search[0][0]
 +   if (len(search)  0):
 +   userbinding = search[0][0]
 +   else:
 +   userbinding=','.join([uid,
 settings.LDAP_BASE_DN])
  ldapo.bind_s(userbinding, password)
  
  return self.get_or_create_user(username, None, ldapo)

 -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/
 powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.

 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


  -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Word-break making it difficult to read numbers of reviews in dashboard navbar

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Kan

In the dashboard navbar, one of my users noticed that if a review group is 
sufficiently long and the group has =100 reviews, the UI wraps both the 
group name and the number of reviews. Wrapping the group name isn't too big 
a deal. However, wrapping the number of reviews makes it a bit hard to 
read, especially when a user is a member of many review groups. I changed 
word-break from 'break-all' to 'normal' in common.min.css which seemed to 
keep the number from wrapping. By doing this though, am I ignoring any 
design decision that led to 'word-break break-all' from being used 
explicitly?

I'm using 1.7.18 btw... Thanks!!!

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Using --revision-range with single revision in subversion

2014-01-31 Thread Daniel F

Perfect - thanks!
I'll try to test when I have some free time.

On Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:05:29 PM UTC-5, Daniel F wrote:

 I haven't been able to successfully use *rbt post 
 --revision-range=SINGLE_REVISION*.
 It works fine if I use the syntax *rbt post --revision-range=*
 *OLD_REV:NEW_REV*
 Am I doing something wrong?


 My steps:

1. Commit some files to svn revision 123.  Note: there are still 
modified files in my working copy which I do NOT want to review.
2. I want to review just the files committed in revision 123, so I 
type:
*rbt post --revision-range=123*
This creates a review request with a diff of the *changes in my 
working copy* instead of showing me a diff of what was committed.  It 
was as if I posted a pre-commit review by typing: *rbt post* .
3. Suddenly it works if I type: *rbt post --revision-range=122:123*


 Using:
 RBTools 0.5.5, ReviewBoard 1.7.21, subversion 1.7.8, python 2.7.5


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Downgrading Reviewboard 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25

2014-05-09 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the 
main server.
This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable 
version).

At this point I usually import the database and media files and all works 
ok.
However I get the following:
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
 
line 89, in get_response
response = middleware_method(request)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.25-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/middleware.py,
 
line 12, in process_request
user = Profile.objects.get(user=request.user)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/manager.py,
 
line 131, in get
return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
 
line 361, in get
num = len(clone)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
 
line 85, in __len__
self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
 
line 291, in iterator
for row in compiler.results_iter():

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
 
line 763, in results_iter
for rows in self.execute_sql(MULTI):

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
 
line 818, in execute_sql
cursor.execute(sql, params)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/backends/mysql/base.py,
 
line 114, in execute
return self.cursor.execute(query, args)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/cursors.py,
 
line 174, in execute
self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py,
 
line 36, in defaulterrorhandler
raise errorclass, errorvalue

DatabaseError: (1054, Unknown column 'accounts_profile.show_submitted' in 
'field list')

I thought this could be a left over column (from the 2.0 installation) - so 
I dropped the tables and re-installed from scratch.
I then checked at my 'live' server is running 1.7.18 whereas this is 
running 1.7.25.
So I then tried an rb-site upgrade and get:
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.

The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

-- begin log output --
Creating tables ...

[!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named
db.fields

[!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named
db.fields
--- end log output ---

Resetting in-database caches.

Upgrade complete!

But still no luck.
I know I am doing something stupid - but can anyone help me spot it
Any help will be much appreciated

Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Downgrading Reviewboard 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25

2014-05-10 Thread Daniel Laird

My original email was not very clear.
On my backup server I want to remove the 2.0RC2 installation and get a 
1.7.x installation running.
However I removed all the RB2.0RC2 files and then dropped the reviewboard 
table from mysql database.
I then did a clean installation of 1.7.25.
I then imported the data from my old server (which was running 1.7.18) - at 
this point I would have thought I would have a 'clean' installation.
However the rb-site upgrade fails and when I visit the homepage I get the 
errors below.

It is almost as if there are some settings files that are stored someone 
not in my installation directory and not in the mysql database.
Might there be some files related to django evolutions that I have to 
delete?

Dan



On Friday, 9 May 2014 20:27:23 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Dan,

 There are many reasons why a 2.0 database will not cleanly turn into a 
 1.7.x database. We stick certain data in new tables/columns that don't 
 exist in 1.7. We've migrated data from those older columns. 
 Django-Evolution has no concept of a downgrade and will likely just break 
 every future attempt to ever upgrade your database again.

 You're looking to keep the 2.0 data in 1.7.x? Any chance you can just 
 upgrade to 2.0 RC 3 and stick with that until 2.0 is out (very very soon)?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


 On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Laird 
 daniel@googlemail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 All,

 Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the 
 main server.
 This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable 
 version).

 At this point I usually import the database and media files and all works 
 ok.
 However I get the following:
 Traceback (most recent call last):

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
  
 line 89, in get_response
 response = middleware_method(request)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.25-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/middleware.py,
  
 line 12, in process_request
 user = Profile.objects.get(user=request.user)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/manager.py,
  
 line 131, in get
 return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
  
 line 361, in get
 num = len(clone)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
  
 line 85, in __len__
 self._result_cache = list(self.iterator())

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/query.py,
  
 line 291, in iterator
 for row in compiler.results_iter():

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
  
 line 763, in results_iter
 for rows in self.execute_sql(MULTI):

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py,
  
 line 818, in execute_sql
 cursor.execute(sql, params)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.4.12-py2.6.egg/django/db/backends/mysql/base.py,
  
 line 114, in execute
 return self.cursor.execute(query, args)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/cursors.py,
  
 line 174, in execute
 self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)

   File 
 /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py,
  
 line 36, in defaulterrorhandler
 raise errorclass, errorvalue

 DatabaseError: (1054, Unknown column 'accounts_profile.show_submitted' 
 in 'field list')

 I thought this could be a left over column (from the 2.0 installation) - 
 so I dropped the tables and re-installed from scratch.
 I then checked at my 'live' server is running 1.7.18 whereas this is 
 running 1.7.25.
 So I then tried an rb-site upgrade and get:
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database. This may take a while.

 The log output below, including warnings and errors,
 can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

 -- begin log output --
 Creating tables ...

 [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named
 db.fields

 [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named
 db.fields
 --- end log output ---

 Resetting in-database caches.

 Upgrade complete!

 But still no luck.
 I know I am doing something stupid - but can anyone help me spot it
 Any help will be much appreciated

 Dan

 -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com

Renaming Repositories

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

I wish to change the name of a repository in Reviewboard (am using it in a 
RB extension).
However when i change the field and enter the authentication details I just 
get a box that says 
'Please correct the error below'

However nothing in shown.
I have check the logs and nothing is showing here either.

Are you able to change a repository name (the name RB gives it)?
I am running RB 1.7.18 on Ubuntu Linux

Cheers
Dan 

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Renaming Repositories

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Laird

We are running 0.7.9
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.6.egg

Cheers
Dan

On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 10:07:55 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Dan,

 What version of djblets is installed?

 -David


 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Laird 
 daniel@googlemail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 All,

 I wish to change the name of a repository in Reviewboard (am using it in 
 a RB extension).
 However when i change the field and enter the authentication details I 
 just get a box that says 
 'Please correct the error below'

 However nothing in shown.
 I have check the logs and nothing is showing here either.

 Are you able to change a repository name (the name RB gives it)?
 I am running RB 1.7.18 on Ubuntu Linux

 Cheers
 Dan 
  
 -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Renaming Repositories

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Laird

I am running 1.7.18 and having this problem.
I could upgrade to 1.7.25 if you think that will fix it?

Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Renaming Repositories

2014-05-14 Thread Daniel Laird

That sorted it - thank you.
Cheers
Dan

On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:49:26 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:

 The fix itself is in djblets 1.7.26. If you upgrade to Review Board 1.7.25 
 you'll get the latest djblets along with it.

 -David


 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Laird 
 daniel@googlemail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 I am running 1.7.18 and having this problem.
 I could upgrade to 1.7.25 if you think that will fix it?

 Dan

 --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Error using post-review and Reviewboard 1.7.25

2014-06-18 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

We are currently using post-review and Reviewboard 1.7.25 (RBtools 0.5.1).
We added a new Repo to Reviewboard and its listed as repository 26.
However when we try to post a new review to Reviewboard we get:

DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: http://server/svn/repo_name, Base path: 
/trunk, Supports changesets: False
  Attempting to create review request on http://server/svn/repo_name for 
None   HTTP POSTing to
http://reviewboard-server/api/review-requests/: 
{'repository': u'http://server/svn/repo_name'}   Got API Error 206 (HTTP 
code 400): The repository path specified is not in the list of known 
repositories   Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'repository': 
u'http://server/svn/repo_name', u'err': {u'msg': u'The repository path 
specified is not in the list of known repositories', u'code': 206}}

Any ideas why it sees the repo in the list, generates the diff and then 
when posting it falls over?

Cheers
Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

TeamForge and Reviewboard

2014-08-12 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

My company have a TeamForge service running and are using GIT as the 
default SCM.
I have a local Reviewboard server and would like to point it at the GIT 
repo - instead of using the default code review tool of gerrit

I am using Reviewboard 1.7.25 currently
The TeamForge project says that the clone URL is:
git clone ssh://MY_USERNAME@gerritforge.DOMAIN:PORT/dashboard

I have tried to setup a repo using my MY_USERNAME/PASSWORD, I have alos 
tried without.
But I am not having much luck.

Has anyone done this, or got it working or any ideas how I could get this 
working?

Many thanks
Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Subversion not updating revisions

2014-08-13 Thread Daniel Dominguez

Hi,

I have a new reviewboard installation (2.0.5), and we've setup a subversion 
repository.  However, the repository is never synchronized with the server 
after it is first added.  I can re-add the repo and am able to see the most 
recent revisions, but after that, the view into the repository becomes 
stale.  By the way, this is when we use the New Review Request link on 
the web UI.  Not sure yet if this is an issue or not with RBTools.  We are 
able to successfully use RBTools for pre-commit reviews.

I've enabled logging and inspected both the reviewboard and the apache log 
files, but nothing interesting shows up.

What is the mechanism to trigger a repository refresh?  Where else can I 
look for useful troubleshooting information?  I'd love to get my 
distributed team to adopt reviewboard, but this is a bit of a blocker at 
the moment.

Any help is appreciated.


OS: Debian 7 64-bit
Python 2.7.3
Using python-svn (since subvertpy was unable to connect to our subversion 
repo)

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

2014-12-18 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to 
create review requests:
svn diff - manually upload
post-review
rbt

I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit an issue.

Some of our reviews no longer display it suggests that a file cant be found.
And seems to have prepended some sub part of the path before the full file 
path.
So I get something like

/svn/REPONAME/http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPONAME/path/to/file.cpp cant be found.

Have we got to change something to make these work?

I can provide logs offline if that helps?

Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

2014-12-18 Thread Daniel Laird

To follow up the error message we get from the diff viewer is:
The file 
'/svn/Common_PythonTests/http://SVN_SERVER_NAME/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py'
 
(r1838) could not be found in the repository: 
'/svn/Common_PythonTests/!svn/rvr/1838/http:/SVN_SERVER/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py'
 
path not found

The review was created before the migration (1.7.25) - we dumped the 
database, re-imported and off we went.
New requests seem to be ok and many of the old requests are fine.  This was 
probably created via the GUI in 1.7.25 and uploaded a diff file produced by 
SVN diff.

Cheers
Dan 

On Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:29:18 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:

 All,

 We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to 
 create review requests:
 svn diff - manually upload
 post-review
 rbt

 I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit an 
 issue.

 Some of our reviews no longer display it suggests that a file cant be 
 found.
 And seems to have prepended some sub part of the path before the full file 
 path.
 So I get something like

 /svn/REPONAME/http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPONAME/path/to/file.cpp cant be 
 found.

 Have we got to change something to make these work?

 I can provide logs offline if that helps?

 Dan



-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel Laird

Christian

Many thanks for getting back to me.
I think I know why it is breaking but don't know how to fix it.

The diff looks as I would expect (with all files being something like this):
Index: libs/A/Source/File.cpp
===
--- libs/A/Source/File.cpp (revision 143446)
+++ libs/A/Source/File.cpp (working copy)

I used the webapi to query the Review and spotted the following on the diff 
resource associated with the review request:
basedirhttp://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPO_NAME/branches/features/software/basedir

I suspect that maybe in the old GUI (Reviewboard 1.7) it used to combine 
this basedir and the file path in the diff to draw the differences.
I think that maybe we have a problem where it appends the Repo Path + 
BaseDir + FilePath
Maybe there is a difference in RB2.0.x?

Our databases on legacy SW used a lot of SVN externals, so someone wrote a 
script to generate a single diff file relative to the SVN_SERVER root.
It allowed us a single review which was better, but it probably set the 
Basedir to be the complete http path.
Maybe it was not supposed to work that way, but we just got away with it.

Interested to see what you think and whether there is a regression or a 
misuse by us that has been cleared up in RB2.0, the only problem now is we 
have 100s of requests that are like this

Hope you can help, and happy to try patches.
Cheers
Dan


On Thursday, 18 December 2014 20:40:16 UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Dan,

 Would you be able to provide some of the data from that diff 
 (specifically, the 'Index:' line, '---', and '+++' lines in the diff)?

 A lot of work was done on Subversion since 1.7.x, so something may have 
 regressed. I don't recall being able to handle file paths containing 
 'http:' in it, though.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 To follow up the error message we get from the diff viewer is:
 The file '/svn/Common_PythonTests/
 http://SVN_SERVER_NAME/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py' 
 (r1838) could not be found in the repository: 
 '/svn/Common_PythonTests/!svn/rvr/1838/http:/SVN_SERVER/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py'
  
 path not found

 The review was created before the migration (1.7.25) - we dumped the 
 database, re-imported and off we went.
 New requests seem to be ok and many of the old requests are fine.  This 
 was probably created via the GUI in 1.7.25 and uploaded a diff file 
 produced by SVN diff.

 Cheers
 Dan 

 On Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:29:18 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:

 All,

 We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods 
 to create review requests:
 svn diff - manually upload
 post-review
 rbt

 I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit an 
 issue.

 Some of our reviews no longer display it suggests that a file cant be 
 found.
 And seems to have prepended some sub part of the path before the full 
 file path.
 So I get something like

 /svn/REPONAME/http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPONAME/path/to/file.cpp cant be 
 found.

 Have we got to change something to make these work?

 I can provide logs offline if that helps?

 Dan

  -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

2014-12-22 Thread Daniel Laird

HI Christian,

Many thanks for the response, it was as you describe, our custom script
(which is for following externals) - is meant to strip the URL. But the
wildcard match failed sometimes, leaving the full URL in the diff file.
Which RB then processed.
On moving the data from old server - new server (with 2.0.11) - I ran some
sed scripts to ensure the SVN paths were consistent.
Now because the BaseUrl matches the file path RB displays it all fine.

I have another issue, but will mail the list about this.

Cheers
Dan

On Friday, 19 December 2014 22:38:42 UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

Hi Daniel,

We never intended the base directory to contain a URL. It sounds like the
custom script is probably responsible for this.

Can you confirm whether the base directory's URL exactly matches the
configured URL for the repository?

In the case that it does match, we take the URL as-is, but if it does not
match, we normalize and start building a path (by combining the repository
path, base directory, and file path in the diff). This was not intended to
handle URLs in the path, but it may be the cause of your problems.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com javascript:
Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com
javascript:
Date: December 19, 2014 at 3:29:19 AM
To: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com
javascript:
Cc: chi...@chipx86.com javascript: chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Subject: Re: Reviewboard 1.7 - Reviewboard 2.0.x update

Christian

Many thanks for getting back to me.
I think I know why it is breaking but don't know how to fix it.

The diff looks as I would expect (with all files being something like
this):
Index: libs/A/Source/File.cpp
===
--- libs/A/Source/File.cpp (revision 143446)
+++ libs/A/Source/File.cpp (working copy)

I used the webapi to query the Review and spotted the following on the
diff
resource associated with the review request:
http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPO_NAME/branches/features/software

I suspect that maybe in the old GUI (Reviewboard 1.7) it used to combine
this basedir and the file path in the diff to draw the differences.
I think that maybe we have a problem where it appends the Repo Path +
BaseDir + FilePath
Maybe there is a difference in RB2.0.x?

Our databases on legacy SW used a lot of SVN externals, so someone wrote
a
script to generate a single diff file relative to the SVN_SERVER root.
It allowed us a single review which was better, but it probably set the
Basedir to be the complete http path.
Maybe it was not supposed to work that way, but we just got away with
it.

Interested to see what you think and whether there is a regression or a
misuse by us that has been cleared up in RB2.0, the only problem now is
we
have 100s of requests that are like this

Hope you can help, and happy to try patches.
Cheers
Dan

On Thursday, 18 December 2014 20:40:16 UTC, Christian Hammond wrote:

Hi Dan,

Would you be able to provide some of the data from that diff
(specifically, the 'Index:' line, '---', and '+++' lines in the diff)?

A lot of work was done on Subversion since 1.7.x, so something may
have
regressed. I don't recall being able to handle file paths containing
'http:' in it, though.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Daniel Lairdwrote:

To follow up the error message we get from the diff viewer is:
The file '/svn/Common_PythonTests/
http://SVN_SERVER_NAME/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py'
(r1838) could not be found in the repository:

'/svn/Common_PythonTests/!svn/rvr/1838/http:/SVN_SERVER/svn/Common_PythonTests/path/to/file/base.py'

path not found

The review was created before the migration (1.7.25) - we dumped the
database, re-imported and off we went.
New requests seem to be ok and many of the old requests are fine.
This
was probably created via the GUI in 1.7.25 and uploaded a diff file
produced by SVN diff.

Cheers
Dan

On Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:29:18 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:

All,

We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of
methods
to create review requests:
svn diff - manually upload
post-review
rbt

I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit
an
issue.

Some of our reviews no longer display

Backup and Restore of Reviewboard 2.0 failing (mysqldump issues)

2014-12-22 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

Since RB 1.5 I have backed up the RB installation everynight be by using
mysqldump user=x password=y reviewboard  backup.sql

I have also backed up all attachments etc.
I could then restore the data easily with another script.

I used this method to upgrade from 1.7.25 - 2.0.11 and with the additional 
rb-site upgrade etc, it all worked great.
However, after 2 days I noticed an error on my setup and re-created the 
site and re-imported the data.

At this point it was a RB 2.0.11 backup being restored to a RB2.0.11 
database.
It all appeared to go ok, but when I clicked on any review i got
Error 500, something broke, I also got the following email:

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.8-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
 
line 112, in get_response
response = wrapped_callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py,
 
line 23, in _check
return view_func(*args, **kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/site/decorators.py,
 
line 35, in _check
return view_func(request, local_site=local_site, *args, **kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py,
 
line 710, in review_detail
'screenshots': screenshots,

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/context.py,
 
line 92, in make_review_request_context
upload_diff_form = UploadDiffForm(review_request, request=request)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py,
 
line 95, in __init__
data, *args, **kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py,
 
line 41, in __init__
if self.repository.get_scmtool().get_diffs_use_absolute_paths():

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py,
 
line 230, in get_scmtool
return cls(self)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/__init__.py,
 
line 73, in __init__
local_site_name)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/__init__.py,
 
line 415, in build_client
client = Client(config_dir, repopath, username, password)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.11-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/svn/pysvn.py,
 
line 41, in __init__
self.client.set_default_password(six.text_type(password))

UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xd5 in position 0: 
ordinal not in range(128)

Has something changed in the internal data structures?
Should I be using some options like --default-character-set=utf8 when 
dumping/importing the database?

Hope you can help
Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Email all users......

2015-01-19 Thread Daniel Laird

All,

Before I try and write some python that queries all users (ideally active) 
and gets their email addresses.  Has anyone else done this and would you be 
willing to share?
I want to be able to announce things like RBtools 0.7 to all active users 
and cant think of another way (other than the MOTD banner).

If you have something I could use/tweak let me know

Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Adding a hyperlink to the navbar

2015-01-28 Thread Daniel Cappuccio

Hopefully this is a simple question with a simple answer as I am very new 
and unexperienced with the code for this web page.

My company uses review board for code reviews and also has a company wiki 
page with the procedures used for code reviews.  I would like to have a 
link to that wiki page appear in the navbar of review board.  (The light 
blue region at the top of the page with other internal links (MyDashboard, 
New Review Request, etc)).  

I found the source html file on the git hub page, but, i cannot find that 
file on the installed and running review board server.  

Is this change even possible?  Is there a process to do this posted 
somewhere else?

Thanks for your patience, understanding, and responses,
Dan

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RBTools, SVN and a strange issue

2015-01-13 Thread Daniel Laird

I am using RBtools 0.6.3 and am trying to post a review to ReviewBoard.
We use SVN as our version control system.

We are not using the .reviewboardrc files but the reviewboard:url property 
as this means less files in the workspace.
For most of our repos this works fine and rbt post creates a review request.

However for 1 of our repos (may be more - not tested all of them) I got the 
following error:
 Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'repository': u'SVN_SERVER/REPONAME/', 
u'err': {u'msg': u'The repository path specified is not in the list of 
known repositories.', u'code': 206}}
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.6.3', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.6.3-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py,
 
line 134, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.6.3-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,
 
line 416, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.6.3-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
 
line 791, in main
submit_as=self.options.submit_as)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.6.3-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
 
line 507, in post_request
raise CommandError(Error creating review request: %s % e)
rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error creating review request: The 
repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories. (HTTP 
400, API Error 206)

After some investigation I checked the Repo setup in Reviewboard.
I found that for most of my repositories I had:
http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPONAME

However for the failing one in question I had:
http://SVN_SERVER/svn/REPONAME/

It seems the addition of the trailing '/' stopped rbtools from posting to 
the server.

With the -d option it shows that it finds the Repo in Reviewboard, only 
when it attempts to POST the diff did it fail.
This might be intentional, however if not.  Perhaps it can be made a little 
more forgiving - maybe don't allow trailing '/' when a repo is configured.

Cheers
Dan

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

2015-02-15 Thread Daniel Laird

After some investigation we found the following:

# TODO: This can break on systems that don't have the en_US local

# installed (which isn't very many). Ideally in this case, we could

# put something in the config file, but that's not plumbed through to here.

env['LC_ALL'] = 'en_US.UTF-8'

env['LANGUAGE'] = 'en_US.UTF-8'

We can confirm that it does break things!

With the 'en_US.UTF-8' locale installed the problem goes away - is there a 
way to check this locale is installed and error nicely rather than breaking?
Cheers
Dan

On Saturday, 31 January 2015 18:49:02 UTC, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Hi Daniel,

 Do you think you could add some code to print out the contents of 'log' 
 inside _convert_symbolic_revision before we try to construct the etree?

 Thanks,
 -David


 On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 4:48:37 AM Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 We have a shared Debian server and we have updated RBtools to 0.7.

 When we try to post a review we get the following:

 SERVER_NAME rbt post -d NUM
  RBTools 0.7
  Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 13 2014, 11:03:55) 
 [GCC 4.7.2]
  Running on Linux-3.2.0-4-amd64-x86_64-with-debian-7.8
  Home = /v/home/rad/USERNAME
  Current directory = /v/space/SERVER_NAME/USERNAME/
 wc/memory_corruption
  Checking for a Subversion repository...
  Running: svn info --non-interactive
  Running: diff --version
  repository info: Path: https://SVN_SERVER/svn-restricted/PROJNAME, 
 Base path: /branches/users/bob/memory_corruption, Supports changesets: 
 False
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/ 
 cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/?max-results=25start=25
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/?max-results=25start=25 cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/1/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/1/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/2/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/2/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/3/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/3/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/4/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/4/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/5/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/5/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/6/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/6/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/7/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/7/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/8/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/8/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/9/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/9/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/10/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/10/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/11/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/11/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/12/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/12/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/13/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/13/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/14/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/14/info/ cannot be cached
  repository info: Path: https://SVN_SERVER/svn-restricted/PROJNAME, 
 Base path: /branches/users/bob/memory_corruption, Supports changesets: 
 False
  Running: svn log -r REVNUM -l 1 --xml
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
   File /v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
 RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py, line 133, in main
 command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN

Re: Review Board version mismatch

2015-02-20 Thread Daniel Bansch

I was able to get it to run by changing the directory name of 
ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg 
to ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg.

On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote:

I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and 
 mysql.  I get this error when I go to my review board site:


 ---

 Manual server updates required

 A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
 these changes are made, you should restart your web server. 

 If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
 list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. 
 Review Board version mismatch 
  
 The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site 
 was last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last 
 upgraded to *2.0.12*. 

 Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: 

 $ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite
 ---

 I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but 
 the same error pops up.

 I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my 
 python site-packages directory.

 Does anyone have any suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Daniel



-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Review Board version mismatch

2015-02-23 Thread Daniel Bansch

I used easy_install.

On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:45:53 AM UTC-6, Daniel Bansch wrote:

I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and 
 mysql.  I get this error when I go to my review board site:


 ---

 Manual server updates required

 A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
 these changes are made, you should restart your web server. 

 If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing 
 list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. 
 Review Board version mismatch 
  
 The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site 
 was last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last 
 upgraded to *2.0.12*. 

 Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: 

 $ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite
 ---

 I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but 
 the same error pops up.

 I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my 
 python site-packages directory.

 Does anyone have any suggestions?

 Thanks,
 Daniel



-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Review Board version mismatch

2015-02-20 Thread Daniel Bansch

   I'm trying to install review board on redhat with apache, mod_wsgi and 
mysql.  I get this error when I go to my review board site:

---

Manual server updates required

A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After 
these changes are made, you should restart your web server. 

If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. 
Review Board version mismatch 
 
The version of Review Board running does not match the version the site was 
last upgraded to. You are running *2.0.13* and the site was last upgraded 
to *2.0.12*. 

Please upgrade your site to fix this by running: 

$ rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite
---

I've run the rb-site upgrade /var/www/mysite and restarted everything, but 
the same error pops up.

I have ReviewBoard-2.0.12-py2.7.egg and ReviewBoard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg in my 
python site-packages directory.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,
Daniel

   

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

2015-01-30 Thread Daniel Laird

We have a shared Debian server and we have updated RBtools to 0.7.

When we try to post a review we get the following:

SERVER_NAME rbt post -d NUM
 RBTools 0.7
 Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 13 2014, 11:03:55) 
[GCC 4.7.2]
 Running on Linux-3.2.0-4-amd64-x86_64-with-debian-7.8
 Home = /v/home/rad/USERNAME
 Current directory = /v/space/SERVER_NAME/USERNAME/wc/memory_corruption
 Checking for a Subversion repository...
 Running: svn info --non-interactive
 Running: diff --version
 repository info: Path: https://SVN_SERVER/svn-restricted/PROJNAME, Base 
path: /branches/users/bob/memory_corruption, Supports changesets: False
 Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/ cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/ cannot 
be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/?max-results=25start=25
 HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/?max-results=25start=25 cannot 
be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/1/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/1/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/2/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/2/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/3/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/3/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/4/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/4/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/5/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/5/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/6/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/6/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/7/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/7/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/8/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/8/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/9/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/9/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/10/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/10/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/11/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/11/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/12/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/12/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/13/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/13/info/ 
cannot be cached
 Making HTTP GET request to 
http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/14/info/
 HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/14/info/ 
cannot be cached
 repository info: Path: https://SVN_SERVER/svn-restricted/PROJNAME, Base 
path: /branches/users/bob/memory_corruption, Supports changesets: False
 Running: svn log -r REVNUM -l 1 --xml
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py,
 
line 133, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,
 
line 538, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
 
line 618, in main
self.revisions = get_revisions(self.tool, self.cmd_args)
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/utils/review_request.py,
 
line 73, in get_revisions
revisions = tool.parse_revision_spec(cmd_args)
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/clients/svn.py,
 
line 128, in parse_revision_spec
revision = self._convert_symbolic_revision(revision)
  File 
/v/home/rad/USERNAME/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7-py2.7.egg/rbtools/clients/svn.py,
 
line 173, in _convert_symbolic_revision
root =

Re: Problems upgrading to 2.0.13 and 2.0.15

2015-04-22 Thread Daniel Dominguez

That fixed it.  Many Thanks!

On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 2:05:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Daniel,

 Sorry, I've been pretty swamped.

 First, make a backup of your database. Then, try:

 DELETE FROM django_project_version WHERE id=4;

 Then perform the upgrade again.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Dominguez daniel.j@gmail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 Any update here?


 On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 1:29:07 PM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote:

 Running --hint --evolve had not been done before.  It was just my 
 experimenting after seeing this issue (with a current backup of the db 
 first of course).

 Anyhow, I've attached the sql dump you requested.

 Thanks!

 On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 8:28:36 AM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote:

 When I performed the upgrade form 2.0.12 to 2.0.13, the site-upgrade 
 failed.  It didn't seem to break our reviewboard instance, so I just 
 ignored it at the time.  I recently upgraded to 2.0.15, and the result is 
 the same.  Again, our reviewboard server seems to be fine, but this is 
 starting to make me nervous.


 -- begin log output --
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.

 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
 required.

 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'description_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added
 In model reviews.Review:
 Field 'body_top_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'body_bottom_rich_text' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequestDraft:
 Field 'description_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'default_use_rich_text' has been added
 CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot 
 resolve automatically.

 
 I've trying running evolve -- --hint --execute, but that fails with the 
 following

 CommandError: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 
 'default_use_rich_text')



 I've checked that I have the latest django_evolution installed for my 
 platform (0.7.4).  This is running on a MySql database.

 It seems like the evolution is trying to add columns that already 
 exist.  Maybe a version table didn't get incremented in the prior 
 evolution?  Any hints on how I can troubleshoot this?



  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Problems upgrading to 2.0.13 and 2.0.15

2015-04-17 Thread Daniel Dominguez

Any update here?

On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 1:29:07 PM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote:

 Running --hint --evolve had not been done before.  It was just my 
 experimenting after seeing this issue (with a current backup of the db 
 first of course).

 Anyhow, I've attached the sql dump you requested.

 Thanks!

 On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 8:28:36 AM UTC-7, Daniel Dominguez wrote:

 When I performed the upgrade form 2.0.12 to 2.0.13, the site-upgrade 
 failed.  It didn't seem to break our reviewboard instance, so I just 
 ignored it at the time.  I recently upgraded to 2.0.15, and the result is 
 the same.  Again, our reviewboard server seems to be fine, but this is 
 starting to make me nervous.


 -- begin log output --
 Creating tables ...
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
 The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.

 Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
 required.

 The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
 In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
 Field 'description_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added
 In model reviews.Review:
 Field 'body_top_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'body_bottom_rich_text' has been added
 In model reviews.ReviewRequestDraft:
 Field 'description_rich_text' has been added
 Field 'testing_done_rich_text' has been added
 In model accounts.Profile:
 Field 'default_use_rich_text' has been added
 CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot 
 resolve automatically.

 
 I've trying running evolve -- --hint --execute, but that fails with the 
 following

 CommandError: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 
 'default_use_rich_text')



 I've checked that I have the latest django_evolution installed for my 
 platform (0.7.4).  This is running on a MySql database.

 It seems like the evolution is trying to add columns that already exist. 
  Maybe a version table didn't get incremented in the prior evolution?  Any 
 hints on how I can troubleshoot this?





-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: RBtools 0.7 - issue posting a review

2015-04-07 Thread Daniel Laird

On a new Ubuntu 14.04 installation I am seeing something similar:
(We are testing 14.04 before wider rollout.)
 Running: svn info --non-interactive
 Running: diff --version
 Running: svn --version -q
 repository info: Path: http://REVIEWBOARD_URL/NAME, Base path: PATH TO 
CHANGES, Supports changesets: False
 Running: svn status -q --ignore-externals
 Running: svn diff --diff-cmd=diff --notice-ancestry -r BASE
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/bin/rbt, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.7.2', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/main.py,
 
line 133, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py,
 
line 555, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py,
 
line 639, in main
extra_args=extra_args)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/clients/svn.py,
 
line 319, in diff
diff = self._run_svn(diff_cmd, split_lines=True)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/clients/svn.py,
 
line 707, in _run_svn
return execute(cmdline, *args, **kwargs)
  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.7.2-py2.7.egg/rbtools/utils/process.py,
 
line 104, in execute
data = [line.decode('utf-8') for line in data]
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/encodings/utf_8.py, line 16, in decode
return codecs.utf_8_decode(input, errors, True)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xe4 in position 17: 
invalid continuation byte

I appear to have all the correct locates installed - but no luck.
It is running SVN 1.8.8 and Ubuntu 14.04 and the latest RBT- any ideas what 
to debug - it does not appear to be log related this time
This command:
svn diff --diff-cmd=diff --notice-ancestry -r BASE
Runs fine on the commandline standalone

Dan

On Sunday, 15 February 2015 21:20:00 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:

 After some investigation we found the following:

 # TODO: This can break on systems that don't have the en_US local

 # installed (which isn't very many). Ideally in this case, we could

 # put something in the config file, but that's not plumbed through to here.

 env['LC_ALL'] = 'en_US.UTF-8'

 env['LANGUAGE'] = 'en_US.UTF-8'

 We can confirm that it does break things!

 With the 'en_US.UTF-8' locale installed the problem goes away - is there a 
 way to check this locale is installed and error nicely rather than breaking?
 Cheers
 Dan

 On Saturday, 31 January 2015 18:49:02 UTC, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Hi Daniel,

 Do you think you could add some code to print out the contents of 'log' 
 inside _convert_symbolic_revision before we try to construct the etree?

 Thanks,
 -David


 On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 4:48:37 AM Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com 
 wrote:

 We have a shared Debian server and we have updated RBtools to 0.7.

 When we try to post a review we get the following:

 SERVER_NAME rbt post -d NUM
  RBTools 0.7
  Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 13 2014, 11:03:55) 
 [GCC 4.7.2]
  Running on Linux-3.2.0-4-amd64-x86_64-with-debian-7.8
  Home = /v/home/rad/USERNAME
  Current directory = /v/space/SERVER_NAME/USERNAME/
 wc/memory_corruption
  Checking for a Subversion repository...
  Running: svn info --non-interactive
  Running: diff --version
  repository info: Path: https://SVN_SERVER/svn-restricted/PROJNAME, 
 Base path: /branches/users/bob/memory_corruption, Supports changesets: 
 False
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/repositories/ 
 cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/?max-results=25start=25
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/?max-results=25start=25 cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/1/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/1/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/2/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/2/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/3/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/3/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/4/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/4/info/ cannot be cached
  Making HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api/
 repositories/5/info/
  HTTP GET request to http://REVIEWBOARD_SERVER/api

Depends-On, Blocks and Circular Reference

2015-07-02 Thread Daniel Laird

WE are running 2.0.17 and have managed to create a situation and dont know 
how to resolve it - or whether its a defect

Someone created 2 reviews with code changes that were dependent.
They marked Review 2 as Depends On Review 1 -  this then updated the 
'Blocks' field.
They then marked Review 1 as Depends On Review 2 - as they felt that both 
reviews had to be committed together.

However the server then starts to give us lots of errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.11-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
 
line 199, in get_response
response = middleware_method(request, response)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.11-py2.7.egg/django/middleware/http.py,
 
line 14, in process_response
response['Content-Length'] = str(len(response.content))

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.8.20-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/responses.py,
 
line 109, in _get_content
**self.encoder_kwargs)

  File 
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.8.20-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/encoders.py,
 
line 110, in encode
return super(JSONEncoderAdapter, self).encode(o)

  File /usr/lib/python2.7/json/encoder.py, line 201, in encode
chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True)

  File /usr/lib/python2.7/json/encoder.py, line 264, in iterencode
return _iterencode(o, 0)

ValueError: Circular reference detected

It maybe that the double linking is incorrect usage - however having been 
able to get into that situation.  If we try to remove one of the 'Blocks' 
fields we just get a spinning 'Loading' icon and are unable to move past 
this to remove the Circular Reference.

Not sure if you think this is user error, a defect or a combination of both 
- but thought I would share it.

Cheers
Dan

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

How big is your Review Board site?

2016-10-06 Thread Daniel Kuecker

With Review Board's recent 10th anniversary, I thought it would be 
interesting to compare the size of everyone's Review Board site.

We are sitting at 125,000 reviews, 2032 users and a 26GB database size on 
disk.

What's yours at?

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt patch "file not found"

Perforce repo and the diff was generated with and older version of RBTools
(post-review era.).

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:06 AM Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com>
wrote:

> What type of repository is this, and how was the diff generated/uploaded?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Daniel Kuecker <dan...@kuecker.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Oops, forgot to mention I am running this on Windows 10.
>>
>> RBTools:  0.7.6
>> RB: tried on versions 1.7.27 and 2.5.6.1
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:50:04 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote:
>>>
>>> Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found
>>> error for every file in the request.  I verified the files are synced to my
>>> local drive.  Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Command line info (path info removed for anonymity):
>>> C:\P4>rbt patch 127325
>>> Patch is being applied from request 127325 with diff revision 1.
>>> Failed to execute command: [u'patch', u'-i',
>>> u'c:\\users\\***\\appdata\\local\\temp\\tmpjq4zbu']
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 3
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |---
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb#6
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>>>   2016-02-18 09:21:42
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>> missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 17
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb#2
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
>>> 2016-02-18 09:21:43
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>> missing header for unified diff at line 27 of patch
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 27
>>> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --
>>> |/***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
>>>
>>>  
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb#2
>>> |+++
>>> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb
>>>2016-02-18 09:21:43
>>> --
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y]
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

Any pointers?

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin <smart.le...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I did.. and i was successful..
>
> On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker" <dan...@kuecker.net> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
>> for distribution on windows?
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>
>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not
>> found and is required by the application" error.
>>
>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> --Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

Hey Christian,

Our clients would rather not install an app on their development machines.
We have been using an older version of RBTools, that we made a custom
post-review for, and built an exe.  The exe is dropped on the client
machine (among many other things) as a tool via a scripted setup script we
run and is called from other build-related scripts.

I only really need post and patch functionality and we hard-code the RB url.

Thanks for the response!!!

--Daniel


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Christian Hammond <
christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:

> Out of curiosity, why not use the RBTools installer we already provide?
>
> The single .exe route will have limitations. I've done a lot of
> py2exe/pyinstaller work in the past for other projects, and it's not a
> route I'd recommend if you can avoid it, at least for more complex projects.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Daniel Kuecker <dan...@kuecker.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe
>> for distribution on windows?
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>
>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not
>> found and is required by the application" error.
>>
>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> --Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

YES!  Thats a wonderful idea (the single shared install)!  Thanks for the
idea!  I think it will work for us!

--Daniel

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com
> wrote:

> Sorry, I don't have any pointers here. Tools like py2exe drastically
> changes the way Python projects execute, which can end up causing a large
> number of tricky to diagnose issues. Having done a lot of
> py2exe/pyinstaller work in the past, it's not a route I'd want to go again.
>
> While I'd accept reasonable patches for things RBTools is doing, it's
> important to note that some things simply will not work, and those are
> things we must ship with. Examples would be any commands that reference a
> shipped data file, or otherwise need to deal with something relative to a
> module path.
>
> I understand the desire to have a single .exe you can drop on development
> machines, but am not sold on this being the way to go. What a lot of
> companies do is have a single shared install of RBTools in some common
> directory on a file server, and have that directory added to the path. Some
> use a wrapper script to set the PYTHON_PATH and such for that. This gives
> you central management of RBTools, usage of the RBTools API, and wouldn't
> require the kinds of work that would be needed to get things in shape for
> tools like py2exe to work.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Daniel Kuecker <dan...@kuecker.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Any pointers?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:54 PM, john levin <smart.le...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I did.. and i was successful..
>>>
>>> On Sep 23, 2016 12:30 AM, "Daniel Kuecker" <dan...@kuecker.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file
>>>> exe for distribution on windows?
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both
>>>> py2exe and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources
>>>> tries to resolve the rbtools package.
>>>>
>>>> The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a
>>>> "pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was
>>>> not found and is required by the application" error.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg
>>>> (although the egg import was never successful), to no avail.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>> --Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsub

Re: How to access the review board site from other system via browser?

Are you getting an error?

Did you copy your apache-wsgi.conf to /etc/httpd/conf.d/?

If you did that, you might need to enable httpd port passthru in the 
firewall.

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 9:19:22 AM UTC-5, P P Gobind Chandra 
Praharaj wrote:
>
> I have set-up all prerequisites and all the installation required for 
> local reviewboard along with rb-site, server is apache httpd with mod_wsi. 
>
>
> Can any one help me on how to access the review bpoard which I have 
> installed locally from different systems via web browser.
>
>
> Below are the steps detailed:
>
>
>
>1. yum -y install zlib zlib-devel 
>2. yum -y install openssl-devel 
>3. yum -y install memcached 
>4. yum -y install python-devel
>5.  yum -y install python-setuptools 
>6. yum -y install patch easy_install
>7.  mysql-python yum -y install git-core
>8. easy_install ReviewBoard 
>9. *rb-site install /var/www/ReviewBoard*
>
>
> *Steps followed during Installing rb-site*
>
>
>-  Domain name localhost:80
>-  Root Path : reviews
>- And other configurations are default.
>
>
> All steps are executed successfully.
>
>
> But I do not know how can I access the review board over browser.
>
> Please help me?
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe for Windows

Has anyone been successful building RBTools 0.7.6 into a single-file exe 
for distribution on windows? 

I'm trying to wrap rbt post functionality into an exe file and both py2exe 
and pyinstaller built exes are having issues when pkg_resources tries to 
resolve the rbtools package.

The exe builds fine, but when I run it, I get a 
"pkg_resources.distributionnotfound: the 'rbtools' distribution was not 
found and is required by the application" error.

I've tried listing rbtools as hidden imports and importing an egg (although 
the egg import was never successful), to no avail.

Thanks in advance!

--Daniel




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt patch on Windows troubles

2016-09-20 Thread Daniel Kuecker

I'm also having issues, but on Windows 10.

I was able to get patch.exe to run via the link Igor posted above 
(http://math.nist.gov/oommf/software-patchsets/patch_on_Windows7.html).

When I manually run patch with the temporary file "rbt patch" creates, it 
crashes.  An inspection of the temporary patch file shows windows line 
endings (LF) instead of unix line endings (CR/LF).  Adding the "--binary" 
option to the patch.exe call 
(per http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) works when 
manually run.

Is there any way to get rbt patch to create a temporary patch file with 
proper line endings?

FWIW:  I ran this from a linux machine and it works fine.

Thanks!

--Daniel

On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 at 3:07:23 PM UTC-5, Igor Berger wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is not a Review Board problem. I'm just wondering whether anyone is 
> using "rbt patch" on Windows 7.
>
> I figured out that in order for "rbt patch" to work, patch itself has to 
> be installed separately.
> I've found these precompiled binaries for Windows: 
> http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm
>
> However, patch crashes even if I use workarounds listed here:
> http://math.nist.gov/oommf/software-patchsets/patch_on_Windows7.html
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thank you,
> Igor.
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: rbt patch "file not found"

Oops, forgot to mention I am running this on Windows 10.

RBTools:  0.7.6
RB: tried on versions 1.7.27 and 2.5.6.1

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:50:04 AM UTC-5, Daniel Kuecker wrote:
>
> Running "rbt patch " command results in a file not found error 
> for every file in the request.  I verified the files are synced to my local 
> drive.  Any ideas?
>
> Command line info (path info removed for anonymity): 
> C:\P4>rbt patch 127325
> Patch is being applied from request 127325 with diff revision 1.
> Failed to execute command: [u'patch', u'-i', 
> u'c:\\users\\***\\appdata\\local\\temp\\tmpjq4zbu']
> can't find file to patch at input line 3
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- 
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>  
>   
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb#6
> |+++ 
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_common_impl_details.rb
>  
>   2016-02-18 09:21:42
> --
> File to patch:
> Skip this patch? [y]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
> missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
> can't find file to patch at input line 17
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb 
>   
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb#2
> |+++ 
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_common_impl_details.rb
>  
> 2016-02-18 09:21:43
> --
> File to patch:
> Skip this patch? [y]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
> missing header for unified diff at line 27 of patch
> can't find file to patch at input line 27
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |/***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb   
>   
>  
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb#2
> |+++ 
> ///***/setupscripts/trunk/16.0/source//_setup_impl_details.rb 
>2016-02-18 09:21:43
> --
> File to patch:
> Skip this patch? [y]
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

rbt patch "file not found"