Raymond, you are very smooth. You almost had me believing that you worship
the same Jesus and God that Terry worships. You see, the God of the Bible
never was a man. He has no beginning and no end. He is the same yesterday,
today, and forever. There were none before Him, and there will be none
Ray, if you are talking about the sticks of Ephraim and Judah in Ezekiel
37...well, sorry to let you down, but that is a prooftext that has no
relation to the book of mormon. We've been over that already on this forum.
Sorry.
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDS folks did coin the anti-Mormon term, and subsequently defined it in
effect as one who actively preaches against and denigrates LDS theology
Right so it is a defense/deflection mechanism to label those that are
engaged in any form of criticism of the
way or another from what they currently believe? Just what
do you perceive the political fallout to be?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDS folks did coin the anti-Mormon term, and subsequently defined it in
effect as one who actively preaches against
with the devil?
So what then; after we find what we have in common?
*/Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
DAVEH: Owhat an interesting response, Perry!
I must say that I do find it rather curious that you would
rather take
/Anti-Mormon
...By that definition, would you not be properly labeled as an
anti-Mormon? If not, how do you define /anti-Mormon/, Perry?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
It would not, since I am not against mormons, per se. I am
against mormoniISM. Not the poor deceived messengers
christianity a bad rep. He probably sees himself as 'suffering for the
cause
of Christ' whereas it's just the 'jerk factor' in play.
Kevin:Speaking JtoJ we ought to keep this in mind.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May
] baptism
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:47:19 -0400
I know Jesus. Kevin is no Jesus. Very bad illustration, Charles Perry
Locke.
(heretofor 'Chuckie' after the films)
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 11, 2005 10:31
Subject
Holy cow, Blaine! Some of what this guy wrote is true! However, there are a
fwe problems:
1. ALL OF THESE WORKS AND WARM FUZZIES HE MENTIONED WILL SAVE NO ONE!
2. HE DID NOT GET DROPPED INTO THE MIDDLE OF THE TEMPLE CEREMONIES AND
WITNESS ALL OF THE OCCULTIC STUFF LIFTED FROM FREEMASONRY!
3.
Dave,
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Thanx for your reply, Perry. Apparently we have a difference of
definitions.
You may consider the difference just a manner of semantics, but I
distinguish between anti-mormon (one who is against mormons) and
anti-mormonism (against what
invitation
from me would hurt no one.
Charles Perry Locke
BTW, are you aware of the BCC: field in email messages? If you would like
to include someone on an email, but do not want their name to show up on the
message, just address them in the BCC: field.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Hello, Raymond. Welcome to Truth Talk. I have not yet had time to write a
response to your lengthy post below, but will get to it when I have time.
Perry Locke
From: Bothoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4
It would not, since I am not against mormons, per se. I am against
mormoniISM. Not the poor deceived messengers of satan that promote it. Call
me anti-statan, or more specifically, anti-mormonism. You can continue to
call me anti-mormon if you want to disperse me :-), but that is not
accurate.
Holey skivvies with masonic emblems on them...the square and the compass.
Tools of the craft.
From: Bothoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 12:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Terry: If not for the
Holey skivvies with masonic emblems on them...the square and the compass.
Tools of the craft.
From: Bothoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 12:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Terry: If not for the
Perry wrote:
Holey skivvies with masonic emblems on them...the square and the compass.
Tools of the craft.
Raymond wrote:
H... It's clear that you are in attack mode.
Since when is mentioning a fact about mormon undergarments an attack? How
can we reasonably discuss facts if, when I
Raymond,
I thought I would answer this post by giving you some background about
what I believe mormonism to be. You would find all of this out eventually,
but by stating it up front I can save us weeks, maybe even months or
probing.
1. I believe the bible to the the Word of God, delivered
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Perry,
For an answer to your questions, Perry, please read section 76 of the
DC--it is, I understand, on-line.
I don't rely on satanically inspired documents for truth.
As to a general reply, I can only say that you seem to have the truth
Friends of Blaine: By all means, please join us here on Truth-Talk. Blaine
needs help! Plus, I look forward to meeting ALL of you. And ALL means ALL.
Just go to this link: http://www.innglory.org/discussions.htm and enter your
email address, then click the Join Truth Talk button.
Perry Locke
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Perry, you need to wipe the fog off your crystal ball. Your mind
reading abilities are as foggy as your logical thinking relating to the ALL
discussion. :-)
Contrary to your belief, I don't need any wiggle room at all to feel
comfortable with
Dave,
It is not what we have in common that is the problem...it is what we do
NOT have in common.
DAVEH: So you have no interest in discussing theology in an effort to see
what we might believe in common?
Cpl: Not Really. I have an interest in exposing the error called mormonism.
DAVEH: To
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] baptism
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 01:11:59 -0700
DAVEH: Owhat an interesting response, Perry! I must say that
I do find it rather curious that you would rather take a more vigorous new
tack against my beliefs rather than
Terry, there is a book call The Distinguishing Traits of Christian
Character, by Gardenr Spring. In it he posits that of the traits that
Christians exhibit, there are two types...those that can be imitated by
non-christians, and those that cannot. He concentrates on the
distinguishable traits;
David,
I agree that ALL has a context, but within the context it always means
ALL, with one exception I will describe later. For example, healing all
that were oppressed of the Devil could mean all that he encountered, or
all that came to him, or all that were brought to him. It does not have
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Wouldn't that suggest *_ALL_* means less than everything?
Dave, are you pulling a Clinton here? Doesn't 'ALL' always mean 'ALL'?
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man.
Blaine,
I know when you say paradise, as a mormon, you men something differnt
than when a Christian says Paradise. And now our fellow TT'rs do, too.
Thanks for pointing that out.
But I must also warn our wary readers that when a mormon says hell, it
may sound as though they are talking
of the text, what it
confers is exegesis
/Charles Perry Locke wrote:/
/From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Wouldn't that suggest *_ALL_* means less than everything?
/
/
Dave, are you pulling a Clinton here? Doesn't 'ALL' always mean 'ALL'? /
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Dave,
There may be things that were culturally relevant for the first century
that, while they do not mao easily to our current culture, certainly have
analogs today. For example, do we really know what dresses meant to the
first century citizen? Whatever they were, it probably is something
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: ... There are quite a few Bible passages that reveal more than
their obvious message. As do parables, many convey more than one message.
And when looked at from an oblique angle, I believe much can be learned
from looking beyond the explicit text.
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Silence of Scripture
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:59:07 -0400
Perry wrote:
I believe it was Luther that said, Where the Bible
remains silent, so shall I. Good advice.
I
thingsbut no NEW revelation, that is, nothing that contradicts
the faith (which has been recorded in the New Testament) that was
delivered ONCE FOR ALL to the saints. The mormon works fail this particular
test because they attempt to ADD TO AND CHANGE the faith.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave
David,
Yes, I am aware of John MacArthur's biases. Did you consider Zodhiates'
position relative to the translation of Hapax? He also indicates that
Hapax is used in a couple of different senses, but specifically references
Jude 3 as being one of the instances similar to the sacrifice...it
Dave,
I think the post you responded to is mine, not Kevin's. Here is Jude 3 in
it's entirety from the NASB:
Jude 3: Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the
salvation we share, I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the
faith that was once for all
cannot take such a casual statement, posed as a question for teaching
purposes, and build a doctrine around it. If you DO consider that as a valid
way of determining doctrine, then why do the mormons not take up serpents
or drink deadly things (Mk 16:18)?
Perry
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From
Lance, I appreciate being included in the group of thoughtful, literate TT
members, even as an also ran, but I do not recall ever identifying any
character deficiencies in DM. Do you recall something I don't?
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It does and, I apologize for not including them.
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Then why do you think those early Christians who practiced proxy
baptism were doing it? Do you think they believed was simply a
*REPRESENTATION*? Or do you suppose they thought it might have more
significance than simply being a *LIKENESS*.
Dave, you are
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLAIN wrote: Now, who is trying to make a doctrine from a single scripture?
Kevin, maybe? The doctrine of Baptism, and it's being necessary for
one's salvation, is made clear--very clear--in various places. None more
clearly though than when the Lord
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLAINE: It is ON-GOING REVELATION that Kevin does not believe in. His
theme is, as always, that revelation ceased with the apostles' deaths. Can
you or Kevin furnish me with any scripture that substantiates this
false--VERY false--doctrine?
Blaine,
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AN even more interesting question is What did they use in Moses time
before???
Well, we know there was law prior to Moses. For example, adam and Eve had a
law not to partake of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Cain and
Able had laws
i hv sn smlr thngs whr ltrs r lft ot nd th txt s stl rdbl.
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: [Fwd: Fw: FW: (no subject)]]
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:33:01 -0500
-
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Perry.I intend to respond to one (or more) of your previous
posts, but am getting behind on both my email and sleep! However, your
below post compels me to ask you a question.
If you really believe that it is God's will that all be saved, why
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAVEH: Pretty funny stuff coming from a guy who admits to not
understanding the Trinity, Perry!
Dave, you are playing a little loose with me here. I understnd the Trinity
in the context in which it is presented in the Bible...I do not understand
the aspects
From: Caroline Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A quick poll for TT:
Who here believes in limited atonement or universal atonement? In other
words, did Jesus die for the sins of the saved or the sins of all men?
Jesus died for the sins of all, but not all will be saved.
Who here believes in predestination,
it does not reduce that fact that we can know and understand
the Trinity from a practical point of view, even though we do not understand
the mystery of it.
Perry
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
Perry Locke wrote:
DavidH wrote:
... After pondering all that, I do find it curious that you would claim
Mormons believe a different Jesus than is found in the Bible.
Ponder this:
The Jesus of the bible is God incarnate...not another or different god.
(See John 1:1...was with God and was God
address the nature of the
Godhead very well. In short, there is a lot I find lacking in this rather
lengthy summary.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
The mormon jesus is NOT the Jesus of the Bible, the one we Christians
worship. Check out this link for details:
http://www.equip.org/free/DT160.pdf
Perry
DavidH wrote:
... After pondering all that, I do find it curious that you would claim
Mormons believe a different Jesus than is found in the Bible.
Ponder this:
The Jesus of the Bible is not the brother of Satan, a fallen archangel.
The Jesus of the Bible is not the son of a man-come-god from
Dave,
I know where you stand and I know where you stand. Lets let it go, okay?
DAVEH: While you continue to criticize me for believing LDS doctrine?
If you have more to say, let it fly. But, at this time, though, I do not.
Perry
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with
I heard it on a radio program a few months back...it is a hoax.
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Sounds of Hell
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:14:18 -0400
Anybody ever heard this tape recording of
In fact, here is a site that claims to have traced it back to the
originator.
http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=21390
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Sounds
BoM Golden Plates witnessed by a man in Octrober of 2003. He even meets JS!
http://www.totse.com/en/religion/christianity/ihaveseenthego179122.html
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6)
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
There must be a resolution to this apparent dilemma.
DAVEH: What dilemma? If you can be one with God, Perry. Why can't Jesus
be one with his Father in Heaven. That would make 3 separate entities that
are one with each other
] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:48:58 GMT
-- Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Gee, another heretical sect.
BLAINE: OoooH! Your ignorance and narrowness are showing, Perry--the
Eastern Orthodox Church has more members/adherants than Protestantism and
Catholicism combined
reprimanding me for doing that. Apparently the Lord thinks you are not to
be referred to by that name!!
Blaine
-- Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, another heretical sect.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blaine: The doctrine of deification is quite plain in the Bible.
According to mormons, so is the doctrine of polygamy and the doctrine of
baptism for the dead, which I do not see in the Bible...yes, I have read
the bible looking for those doctrines,
that you do not believe in.
I find that in general the mormons do that with the Bible, too.
Perry
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] to Perry on heretics--an apology
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:44
: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:07:32 -0700
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, I am honest with my responses to you. It is not hypocritical for me
to ask for a prooftext. If you asked me the wife/dog question I would
answer neither...next question
I beleive that the 12th apostle, selected by the 11 to replace Judas,
fulfilled the requirment of having seen Jesus face-to-face...and Paul... he
met jesus face-to-face before becoming an apostle. On the road to Damascus.
It is conjectured that he was personally taught by Jesus, too, after
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:24:46 -0700
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,thanks for your answers.
DAVEH: You are welcome, Perry.
So, what I got from
Gee, another heretical sect.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:15:22 GMT
Charles Perry Locke wrote: And, although mormons apparently
Dave (and Blaine if you are still around),
I have been wondering this for a few days, and need you help to
understand it.
The mormon god is an exalted man, of flesh and bones, right? And, he has
multiple (would you say a thousand or so?) spiritual wives, right? And, he
has sex with them
them?!?!?!
Hm.seems rather hypocritical to me, Perry. Do you really want to
know what I believe, and what I believe Scripture teaches, Perry.or do
you just want to lampoon me?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave (and Blaine if you are still around),
I have been wondering
us some common
ground on which to strike up a conversation :-)
Perry
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:29:26 -0700
Charles Perry Locke
Izzy, pardon me butting into your conversation with John, but I have always
understood a discussion forum to be open to all members of the forum to
comment, positive or negative, on anything posted. It seems that if a
participant wants privacy (releatively speaking, since email, in general, is
David,
The chanting for water for Terri in the background was not disruptive,
did not overwhelm the speakers, yet was direct and to the point. Your hope
that perhaps your words could influence a judge is well founded. You never
know when you might say a word that opens their hearts, and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLAINE: Hmmm, well let's see now. How about the one regards Joseph
Smith's revelations/prophecies?You and Kevin fulfill one of them every
day, as do most street Preachers. See below:
DC 1:16
They seek not the Lord nor his righteousness, but
Blaine,
I was on a rail platform a few days ago, catching the light rail from El
Segundo to Norwalk (Los Angeles area). I noticed that the floor of the
platform occasionally had a tile that had been sculpted by an artist and
that they expressed various themes. Some of the bas relief pictures
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How 'bout we take one of us each week, put that person on a chopping block
and then the rest of us can verbally hack at him or her until all the
victim's shortcomings lay bare.
Terry, in the proper environment this can be very healthy towards
John, did you toss washers when you were a kid? Big 3 washers into a tuna
tin buried in the ground? I have never met anyone else that has tossed
washers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] God's Hate and God's
Caroline, is suicide, such as hanging oneself, a sin? Can one repent of sin
after one is dead? If you answered yes', then 'no' to these questions, then
how did Judas repent by hanging himself?
Perry
From: Caroline Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Lets not forget the fact that DNA evidence positively demonstrates that the
Indians have absolutely no inheritance from Hebrew people. None. Zilch.
Nada. Check out this web page, and especially the video near the end of the
page:
http://www.godandscience.org/cults/dna.html
In this
Torture?
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:06:14 GMT
-- Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your mind has been polluted by the heretical LDS
works. If you relied on his Word you would clearly see that your
impressions
of God are all wrong.
BLAINE: I keep noticing that you do a lot of labeling
. And I know it. For the Bible tells me so.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hell = Physical Torture?
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:14:49 -0800
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL
to us about his nature.
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Loving and Merciful God of Justice
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:37:36 -0800
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave wrote:
I think one of the biggest
Dave, God is perfect, your parents are not. His ways are not their
ways...His thoughts are not their thoughts. They are fallen in nature, He is
not. He is the creator, they are the created. He is eternal, omniscient, and
omnipresent, they are not. To assign them the same traits and character is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] to Perry and Kevin
BLAINE: AHA! You could not resist the temptation to get back into the
fray of things, Perry! I am laughing! You wanted to just stand off and
let Kevin handle/bungle it all, right?
You are easily amused,
Dave wrote:
I think one of the biggest /problems /(if that is the proper word to
use) I have with Protestantism is their view of hell and damnation. I've
said it before, but for some of you who are a bit new to TT, I'll give you
a brief explanation. It seems to me that Protestants are far
Blaine, I do not see that you have given an adequate apology for the fact
that the prophet of the LDS church could not see that the Hoffman forgeries
were fake. Plus, there are other great errors made by former LDS prophets
and the LDS church in general. Are you truly blinded to thiose thngs?
There are also 10 types of people...those who understand binary, and those
who don't.
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Courtesy of A.Word.A.Day
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:32:37 -0800
There are
Blaine, isn't there supposed to be a great falling away before the end?
Maybe that is what we are seeing in Europe. When people join the LDS, that
is falling away, too! They are part of the problem!
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Izzy, it appears as though the ha ha message is from Glen Tabor...remember
Glen? This was not Gary if the header is correct.
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Izzy's response
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005
we need them when the crowd is but a few feet away.
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
G,
My question to Blaine was in response to his knocking SP's,
particularly those at the LDS GC and their methods. I thought it would
Dave, I am afraid running the question of whether JS was baptised a Baptist
through a LDS forum will only get you the answer you want instead of the
truth. The LDS is an organization known for suppresssing the truth. You have
to look outside the LDS box to get the truth. That is why we see the
*** LDS REDEFINITION ALERT! ***
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:50:21 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
was the L:DS Church according to SPs/rebuttal
BLAINE wrote: Thousands? At best, only
see the presidents State of the Union address?
Is that the only legitimate use of amplification?
Free Speech carries with it the right to be heard.
Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G,
My question to Blaine was in response to his knocking SP's
Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Prayer in Evangelism
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:18:11 -0800
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
You have pulled this conversation way off track.
DAVEH: Really?!?!?! I thought I
G,
My question to Blaine was in response to his knocking SP's, particularly
those at the LDS GC and their methods. I thought it would be interesting to
find out what he thinks would be the best way to evangelize Mormons. While
sending out missionaries two by may two work in peoples homes, it
I have seen some changes in the Mormon Faith -
perhaps indicating that the move of God effects even that fellowship.
John
John, will you please elaborate on what changes you have seen in Mormonism?
As I understand it, other than removing some objectional material from the
secret temple
22:39:13 -0800
DAVEH: I've changed the subject line to more accurately reflect the
topic
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
Please show me the scriptures that says one comes to faith by praying
for them.
DAVEH: Why do you need that any more than you need
John, the Koran verse in your post has been shown to be a hoax.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Facts about Iraq
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:02:50 EST
Subject: IRAQ
IRAQ - VERY INTERESTING - DID YOU KNOW?
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Stirring up the fallow ground-used to be What is a
Ch ristian?
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:04:51 -0800
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
Please show me
Good answer, Blaine. I do think that the LDS missionary force is quite
impressive...if only their message was true it would not be such a massive
waste of time and resources :-(. You may never have heard this, but hank
Hanegraaff says, If only Christians were willing to do for Christ what the
Did you know that the obelisk is a Masonic symbol taken from ancient egypt?
At the base of the Washing Monument is a placard that says it was dedicated
in a Masonic ceremony. Did you also know Joseph Smith was a Mason? Did you
also know that there is such a monument to Joseph Smith in New
Blaine, please tell us what evangelical approach would work best with
Mormons, especially at the General Conference. Help us out here.
Thanks,
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Stirring
: Prayer.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Good question!
*/Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
Blaine, please tell us what evangelical approach would work best with
Mormons, especially at the General Conference. Help us out here.
Thanks,
Perry
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=30648/*http
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] What is a Christian?
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:35:16 -0500
Charles said:'to Christians, when one dies, one's fate has been
cast...there
is no second chance.' This is
to this later.
Debbie
-Original Message-
From: Charles Perry Locke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:47 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] concept-reality Q
Debbie wrote:
My questions arising have to do with learning: How does one know how
great
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
DaveH,
Something is being twisted here beyond it's bounds. The term street
preacher refers to all evangelicals that preach in the open air, but you
are using it to refer to those that offend you.
DAVEH: ??? I don't recall saying
DaveH,
I know you did not address your response to me, but when you talk about
some TTrs below, I am probablyi n that group and would like to clarify one
thing.
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOW.Is there any point at which there will ever be /peace /between some
TTers and me, or
Dave, Blaine, if you see any error in Kevin's post below, feel free to
correct them.
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Why so many LDS bad apples?
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
501 - 600 of 1011 matches
Mail list logo
