Somebody the other day said that if we all asked IBM
(nicely) we might
be able to get UniData-type profiling available on
UniVerse...
I sent a message to U2AskUs and got back a snotty (sorry
Jackie!) reply
The appropriate way to request an enhancement is to raise
it with
your support
Hi all,
Firstly, thanks to Cliff for all his work over the years.
I guess that most of us are looking to move to the U2UG site. I started off
down that path this morning but, being a careful sort of person, I read the
terms and conditions. Clause 7a worries me. I have discussed this briefly
My other, !!!MAJOR!!! concern with this is the loss of the medium of
mail. This is actually probably quite a serious loss for non-USians :-(
(Plus it's the only practical medium at work :-(
Forum software assumes easy access to a fast, cheap internet pipe. None
of the fora I have seen is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 19:16
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: U2UG Contract
SNIP
- consolidating the MV world back to cdp is something I'm very pro.
SNIP
As a relative
news:comp.databases.pick
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rainer Gromansperg
Sent: 29 March 2004 10:38
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: U2UG Contract
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cliff,
We whose lists are about to die, salute you.
It's been a great service - you should be held up as a shining example to
moderators everywhere in promoting the best blend of discussion, humour and
debate amongst a very informative list.
More than that, you have made us all into a (not
Just to add,
And if they clash with SQL keywords like DATE, USER or STATUS.
So it's just generally safer to enforce them, as you never know what
keywords are likely to be added in the future.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry
I suggest we take over comp.databases.pick or fire up something new on
usenet -- I agree that web-based discussion groups tend to suck majorly.
Matti
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 29 March 2004 10:16
To: U2 Users
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:38:07 +1000, Rainer Gromansperg wrote:
snip
As a relative new list-user could you please let us know what 'cdp' is?
Newsgroup: Comp.Databases.Pick
--
Allen Egerton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, Wol, wot's cdp?
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Yeah I agree, forums are a pain - A new mailing list would be my prefered
choice.. If I had the bandwidth I would set it up..
Raymond de Bourbon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dennis Bartlett
Sent: 29 March 2004 13:06
To: 'U2 Users
What are the bandwidth requirements to service the lists?
-Original Message-
From: Raymond de Bourbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 13:20
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: U2UG Contract
Yeah I agree, forums are a pain - A new mailing list would be my prefered
British Humour in the morning ain't it great?
Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner LLP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/29/04 05:36AM
Cliff,
We whose lists are about to die, salute you.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sbsolutions rbsolutions are on yahoo groups..
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbsolutions
you can select individual emails, digests or no email, and read on the
website..
maybe a u2solutions?
-Original Message-
From: Raymond de Bourbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 13:20
For what it's worth I'm writing a trigger-based solution
in-house.
Progress has stalled for the mo' for a lack of time, but
basically it's
as follows:
The RC means Revision Control
Two files:
RC.PROJECTS -stores a description,
creation author, date, time
Cliff,
I would like to thank you for being a selfless and non-partisan moderator as
well as an apparent workaholic all these years, supporting the needs of the
Universe/Unidata user base as well as the incredibly diverse whimsey found
within the ranks of your loosely coupled band of angels.
I am
Basically, it means that you've hit a SIGILL, an illegal instruction signal,
during the execution of the BASIC program, at address 5004.
If that part of the error message is consistent (the address 5004), you can
determine WHERE in the program it is failing by looking at the VLIST listing.
I'd
Cliff,
THANK YOU for all your years of service for the list. It's been great.
Now, a question for everyone. Is the U2UG an IBM sponsored web forum that
retains all the info? If so, I'm not going to be there very
long... Thanks for any info on this.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL
U2UG.org is a not sponsored by IBM, it's an independent non-profit organization.
Donald Verhagen 1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delray
It would give the U2UG.org organization rights *not* IBM, they are seperate from each
other.
Don Verhagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8:58:04 AM 03/29/2004
[snipped..]
I heartily agree with Martin Phillips, that I would think twice and consult
our legal advisors before posting anything (perhaps even a
Anyone know what I equate ESC to for starting commands to an OKI 321?
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
..Yes I'll see you, I'll see you on the other side...
- Ozzy Osbourne
-Original Message-
From: Brian Leach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 5:36 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: The lists are closing
Cliff,
We whose lists are about to die, salute
The escape (or ESC) is CHAR(27)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ray Buchner
Sent: 29 March 2004 15:25
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: @WL ESC for OKIDATA
Anyone know what I equate ESC to for starting commands to an OKI 321?
--
Use CHAR(27)
Gary Eppel
Cerner Corp.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ray Buchner
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:25 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: ESC for OKIDATA
Anyone know what I equate ESC to for starting commands to an
Ye'll tak the high road and I'll tak the low road ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Burwell, Edward
Sent: 29 March 2004 15:35
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: The lists are closing
..Yes I'll see you, I'll see
I have a simple-minded idea that may increase the value of the U2UG website and
prevent us from loosing the huge amount of already accumulated knowledge that resides
in this list. Would it be possible to transfer the posts to the list to the website?
I know that there may be some legal
I have a simple-minded idea that may increase the value of the U2UG website
and prevent us from loosing the huge amount of already accumulated
knowledge that resides in this list. Would it be possible to transfer the
posts to the list tothe website? I know that there may be some legal
I don't have any info in my Oki 321 manual on using bar codes. Sorry
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ray Buchner
Posted At: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:43 AM
Posted To: Informix-mv
Conversation: OKI Code 39 BarCode
Subject: OKI Code
This would tell me that you have two programs running:
Session 1 locks Record A
Session 2 locks Record B
Session 1 WANTS to lock Record B, and holds, awaiting the lock release
Session 2 NOW Wants to lock Record A - if this happens, DEADLOCKS occurs -
neither program will ever be able to progress.
Clif,
Thank you for being such a good host, it has been a pleasure. I have belonged to this
list (off and on as jobs changed) from the Mike O'Rear days and it will feel like a
club has broken up. I have registered 3 times on the U2UG web site but have never
gotten anything from the site. Is
Or maybe there could be a way for us to download them in a zipped format? Probably
too much data though huh? BTW, I too want to pay my respects to Clif for hosting the
list. I have learned so much just by reading through other peoples
problems/experiences and by the direct responses to my
The archives for the lists (which go back to the mid-90's) would remain
for now at http://www.indexinfocus.com. But I don't yet see a way to go
forward on our site archiving the IBM web content so they'd be static. We
do plan real soon now to add other content.
Is there a general opinion that
I can't say if MV is slow or inefficient as far as database handling
compared to various relational DBMS environments.
I don't think its hard to prove that UV is Much IN-Efficient than other
advanced DataBase Technologies. Here is a simple test...
1. Populate UV and Oracle with around 10
Joe
1) Check again... one of IBM's partners is Epicore
http://www.epicor.com/www/ which is using a Unidata database and XML
technology in several of their products.
3) Our company has two divisions one on Oracle and one on Unidata. The
Unidata side has two programmers compared to the 8 on the
I would argue that the lists should continue. With some employers offering
e-mail, but not web-access to their employees, those employees would be
able to contribute to an e-mail list, but not a forum.
Steve Wagner
At 11:02 AM 3/29/04 -0500, you wrote:
The archives for the lists (which go
While Yahoo groups hasn't been the best or most consistent host in the
world, there is no plan at the time to move our sbsolutions folks over to
u2ug. Not to be a stick in the mud, but things are working really well over
there and there's no compelling reason to move at this point in time.
So, what's your point? Use C# against the UV database if that's what you want to do
(I and others have been doing this for a couple of years now). If your so dead set
against UV, then switch your site to Oracle or DB2. Send us another note in 6 months
and let us know what you spent on
At the risk of being rude (which I don't really mind all that much). Your
comments simply verify my initial suspicion that you are quite ignorant of
the structure and usage of the Universe environment. Anyone who would
characterize the Universe database as flat file is either A) an idiot or
B)
We have UV doing everything on the BackEnd, we also have MSSQL Server to
Support Data Warehousing... Why 2 Databases Systems?
Cause UV Cant support Data Warehousing?
Doesn't this eventually introduce Disparate Systems?
U2, for example, has support for Java connectivity, XML, and I believe
Any Software that can do a TON of Stuff is MUCH More Complex!
Is SAP easy to Learn?
UV/PICK doesn't even use Strong Data Typing (Integer/Float/String)...
Half the complexity and Performance is Lost there...
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
I just tested the subscribe button on the Universe Forum and I am
definitely receiving new posts as email. Unfortunately, to reply to the
posting you have to do so on the webpage (there is a link provided in
the email) :-( So it's half-way there in terms of the comments/wishes
I've seen so far
This is a Constructive Argument... Don't you have an argument to prove
that UV is efficient rather than getting to Personal Stuff.!
I have done my homework on Stress Testing Applications...
If you can prove UV is efficient... DO IT!
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I can't speak for your in house guys, but here, we do warehousing on the UniVerse
machine. It does support it quite well. We Use the UniVerse machine to feed data to
a couple of SQL server based solutions (they are third party vertical apps). How does
the data get from UniVerse to SQL
Funny, I find the fact that I don't have to deal with how long a string is to be a
feature. Same with floats, inegers etc. You really do not understand anything about
Pick or UniVerse. You should put down the keyboard and read a bit. No more replies
on this please.
Don Kibbey
Financial
Joe,
I shouldn't even dignify this crap with a reply, but anyway ...
1. Populate UV and Oracle with around 10 Million records.
2. Write fairly complex Web Application against it.
3. Run a Web Application Stress tool(around 1000 Users)
switching Databases within the same DB Machine.
We've
Hi,
Having been part of this list for only a short period I have found the
discussions very useful and the answers to questions posed have always
worked, even though we use Universe as our database, most of the solutions
are universal across the MV community.
I for one will be sorry to see the
So, UV does everything on the BackEnd, but SQL Server does your data
warehousing.
And you question why UV can't support the DW? Why not ask the alternate
question
of why the SQL Server can't handle the backend?
No one is saying UV is a truly 'enterprise' class DB. It's not marketed as
such.
Proof of seek and ye shall find. Thanks
I have the www.indexinfocus.com archiver hooked up to it so it will
archive the technical content. I am sure the site has archiving ability,
but if you want the whole she-bang back to the heady-90's we have here.
www.indexinfocus.com will include the u2
You want Pick on the web... simple, use Visage!
Patrick Will Williams, President
American Computer Technics, Inc.
919-567-0042 Raleigh, NC
- Original Message -
From: David T. Meeks
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: Modern Universe
Brian,
Correct me if I am wrong...
IBM Says UV is an Extended relational database
Well Some people call it MVDBMS. I wonder how this is different
from Nested Table Data Structure within any RDBMS.
Can you explain?
Complex processing managed locally to
the
database, without having to add
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn
- Clark Gable as Rhett Butler in Gone with the Wind
At 12:01 PM 3/29/2004 -0500, you wrote:
With all due respects, Sir, you are beginning to bore the hell out of me!
-- Clint Eastwood as Gunnery Sgt. Thomas Highway in Heartbreak Ridge
Last I looked at Visage, it:
1) required javascript skills
2) had no published price
3) had no developer copy available
4) had not only a developers cost but a per seat cost
Apart from those 4 problems, however, the movies did make it look like
an impressive product.
-Original Message-
Don,
Picked this up on your reply to the guy who thinks strong typing is a
virtue.
So, what's your point? Use C# against the UV database if
that's what you want to do (I and others have been doing this for a
couple of years now).
I would like to use C# against unidata what do I need to do
Why not ask the alternate question of why the SQL Server can't handle
the backend?
Simple Reason... Management Politics.
No one is saying UV is a truly 'enterprise' class DB.
WE AGREE 100% NOW! I was just trying to say the above.
Going MainStream and staying with BIG THREE is Better for
Thanks Cliff for maintaining the wonderful user group. I will definitelyy
miss it.
Guys,
Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program which
will be called using EXECUTE PHANTOM .
Ive even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Thanks.
Carol.
Ray,
You don't say which model Oki you're using. Manuals are on-line at
http://my.okidata.com .
Did you first issue the ESC DLE A command to specify that Code39 is to be
used? For testing, try a string (HEX) like:
27 16 65 08 02 00 01 01 02 02 03 01
Kent
At 06:42 AM 3/29/2004, Ray Buchner
From: Carolina Lizama [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program - which
will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Common exists on a per-user basis. So, if your phantom initializes it, it
can use
-Original Message-
From: george r smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:21 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: Question for Donald Kibbey
There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary
and I am not one
of them.
Your not 01, so you must
Carolina,
Could you write the variable out to a file and read it in within your program?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Carolina Lizama
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: COMMON Variable.
Thanks
Why not write the value to a commonly located record and then read it in the
phantom?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Allen Egerton
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:11 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: COMMON Variable.
Or pass it in the phantom statement and parse in out in the program.
EXECUTE PHANTOM %PARM1%PARM2%PARM3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONVERT % TO @FM IN VAR
PARM1=VAR2
PARM2=VAR3
PARM3=VAR4
unless it is a record or dimensioned array
Vance
1) We DO want to leave the archives at indexinfocus.
2) We DONT want to replicate the archives onto u2ug
3) We DONT want the lists to continue
Go to the web site, and enter each forum you are interested in and click on SUBSCRIBE
this will make all responses come to your email box just as they do
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:07:24 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
1. Populate UV and Oracle with around 10 Million records.
2. Write fairly complex Web Application against it.
3. Run a Web Application Stress tool(around 1000 Users)
switching Databases within the
Not to be obnoxious but why not keep data in one place? How would it benefit someone
to start a question in one medium and then be referred to another? That sound
counter-intuitive to me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:27:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
e.g. We pull XML Reports from our Vendors Real Time. I have to parse
through the XML and give UV/PICK Guys a FLAT TEXT File... cause either
UV Cannot handle the storage and Retrival of XML Data Using
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:55:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
embedded data base support
The other day, someone asked me if I used an embedded database. And I was like ...
what?
Can someone give ten words or less of what an embedded database is? And then
Please Speak LOUDER!!!
*throws you a raw steak*
Will raw steak Johnson
In a message dated 3/29/2004 12:26:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Going MainStream and staying with BIG THREE is Better for the
future of the Company's Needs. BIG THREE has A LOT OF
INVESTMENT
in
In a message dated 3/29/2004 1:11:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom
program - which
will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Yes Carolina. There are a
I think Joe may realize a couple things:
1) He doesn't know enough about the system to criticize it.
2) The IT people in his UV shop didn't know much either.
Many Pick guys get into Pick because they know their business market but not
much about technology, and Pick makes it easy to write
George, the best commercial integration option available for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data. When IBM has UO.NET, that
situation may change, but developers must research and understand the
capabilities of both products before making assumptions and decisions - it
You don't seem to be able to put any values on the phantom line
(and if you do, they seem to be ignored). I never tried Commons
for this.
Another method I use is I create a VOC entry
based on UserNO and something static like:
(ex. 101phantom)
1PA
2RUN LIB PROGRAMNAME PASSVAR1 PASSVAR2 PASSVAR3
In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:28:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
George, the best commercial integration option available
for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't
Just as everyone else is, I too am sorry to see the
list go away.
My parting request is for help personally. I am
currently unemployed or should I say an under-employed
consultant after having been downsized about two years
ago. I have over 20 year's experience with
unidata/pick and IT project
(adjusting tin foil headgear)
You do realize that Micro$oft is really in the hard drive business.
Of course .Net takes up a gazillion megabytes and to use my method of getting to
UniVerse with C# (so you can type in all those cool looking semi-colons) you'll have
to load another half gazillion
Tony,
Get the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data and get the same support
as Clink for mvBase - no thanks.
There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary and I am not one
of them.
George Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darwin,
Sorry to hear you are in a dry spell.
You might also consider posting your information on the Talent
Available forum at www.u2ug.org, if you have not done so already.
--
Regards,
Clif
I realize things are tough right now everywhere, but
if you would be interested in speaking to me or
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't integration require an object?
I can't speak of the Pick Data Provider for .NET, however, the .NET
framework itself doesn't take up a 'gazillion' bytes. The framework (free
download) is between 21 24MB (depending on the
MvBase?
I think he was saying best provider for MV not for MvBase
Right?
And I didn't say it, he did.
Will the real Will not the fake posing Will's Johnson
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Will,
Unless something has changed since
Like Wol and a couple of others, my participation as a listener and
occasional poster will stop if the medium changes from email to web or
news-group. My employer does not permit desktop internet access - we do have
a large and rich intranet - for reasons of security, of cost (we pay for
TRAFFIC
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:15:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I don't really know what you are after with the
integration requiring an
object. Can you be more specific?
Regards,
Jim
Yes.
Integrate as a verb I think applies to mathematics.
But if I say My
It would have been easier if you just asked me to reread the original post
;-)
I think I know what Tony meant with his statement, but, it isn't appropriate
for me to answer for him so I won't.
Thanks for the English lesson - I think.
Regards,
Jim
[snip]
Integrate in this sense requires a
Well, not sure about 10 words or less, but here's my effort:
An embedded database is a technology that is deployed as the component
responsible for data management within a business application.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/29/2004 2:18
Michael,
Visage does not require Javascript skills, but if you have those skills Visage allows
you to use them.
The published price for Visage Designer is $2,495 USD and comes with 3 Run-Time
versions. Additional Run-Time Visage versions are $265 each... but that amount is a
one-time-only
Hmm ... I thought that what IBM mean by 'embedded database' is
the database you didn't even know you had.
[8 words!]
I.E., there's a database 'embedded' in the software package you bought /
use, but you may have no idea that there is a database in there, and even if
you do understand that fact,
Yep...
Very true...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Charles
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: 3/29/2004 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: What are embedded databases
An embedded database is a technology that is deployed as the
component responsible for data management within a
Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program - which
will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
You could try 'named pipes' to pass the information BUT this is a large
topic. You may need to do some investigation.
It
Thank you David,
I shall talk with the programmers.
Regards
Kafsat
-Original Message-
From: David Wolverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 1:19 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SB error
This would tell me that you have two programs running:
Here is the file.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
One could check www.okidata.com to see if there's any support for manual
printer driver stuff like bar codes. I use www.hp.com to get beaucoups of HP
PCL stuff.
my 1 cent.
- Original Message -
From: Ray Buchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Joe
I have worked with variety of databases and I think using one
performance statistic to evaluate the capabilities of one database
against another is meaningless. As a professional I consider all
databases for any business requirement and select on their merits. To
discount MV products
Michael,
If you have VISAGE questions, Ross Ferris of STAMINA is a list
member (we still have a few days in which we can call ourselves list
members) and I'm sure he can answer your pricing and technology questions.
- Charles We'll miss Clif Barouch
Michael Spencer wrote:
Last I looked
Joe,
Here's a few things to consider. MV environments (including
UniVerse), allow for small teams to develop and adjust business rules
more quickly than you can you can in Oracle, Sybase, or Informix.
Published statistics show that MV environments are roughly twice as
efficient in disk
CDP is all very well, but the noice ratio can be quite high, not to mention
the trolls.
If we don't move to U2UG (and I think U2UG will be fine once we can reply by
email and they clarify their intellectual property problem, and it would be
nice if their emails contained a bit less guff) we
Hi Joe,
Perhaps you could share your actual searches, code and database
structure? Were you searching 20 million records in a single column
table? Multiple fields (or columns if you insist) in the Universe
database? What is this PICK you keep talking about? Universe doesn't
have a component named
Joe,
Have you checked the file sizes? Have you checked the index
parameters? I'll make you a bet. You bring me in for a week (i'll
probably need most of that week to prove my results, the fixes will take
less than a day) and I bet you we can make a meaningful improvement in
your response
This is what I meant ... TYPO
RESULTS
Machine: 950 MHZ Athlon
Database: MSSQL SERVER 2K
Records: 20 Million
Indexes: NO
Search Column: First Name
Search Type: Wild Card (*)
Search Time: 2 Seconds
--
Machine: QUAD Processor Box (4 GHZ)
Database: UV Version 10.1
Records:
george r smith wrote:
Get the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data and get the
same support as Clink for mvBase - no thanks.
Well George, there are many more engineers and support people working on
PDP.NET than on mvBASE. mvBASE is a dead-end DBMS product that RD inherited
- Clink was dead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George, the best commercial integration option available
for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't integration require an object?
As in... integration with .. what?
Will
Dude, your like the dog that just won't stop humping the guests leg. Get
over it already.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:31 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was:
Joe
Have you sized your UV file correctly? The 15-20 seconds suggests many
things are not as they should be.
Can you do an ANALYZE.FILE on this file and post the details. If it is a
dynamic hashed file include the option STATS please.
We may be able to help you after all.
Cheers
Trevor
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
