The presence of a previously
unknown form of energy was frequently inferred by HHO researchers from the
amazing scalability of oxyhydrogen welding torches.
I've watched this happen; watched firebrick MELTING in seconds right in front
of my own lyin' eyes... It was called Brown's gas
.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2008 10:49:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Science and faith
- Original Message
From: PHILIP WINESTONE
Many years ago, George Orwell wrote a very powerful essay, entitled
Many years ago, George Orwell wrote a very powerful essay, entitled, Benefit
of Clergy.
It clarified - as only Orwell could - a similar type of situation.
I recommend that all Vorticians read it and think about what Orwell was trying
to say.
P.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene
Quite right Ed. For an interesting story on this, read any of the biographies
of Edgar Cayce - The Sleeping Prophet
P..
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Oil Gang responds
Hmmm... Ya don't think that higher oil prices are due to (1) greed, and (2) the
holy purpose of holding the world by the balls until the Caliphate is
established (ie - the West succumbs financially and goes down the tubes)? It
seems that the scientific idea of cause and effect is somewhat
, but the brute force approach is not working either. Unless
rational decisions are made in the future, the result I fear will not
please either one of us.
As for further discussion of this topic, I apologize to anyone who finds
this boring or unimportant.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Hmmm
to be. The question is, what do you
suggest we do now?
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
I personally don't like the idea of playing nice with people whose
greatest wish is to cut my throat. The leader of the greatest and most
benevolent country in the world (I didn't say it was perfect) has to
make
I like all that Steven... I do tend to lecture a little (perhaps a lot); just
ask my wife...
But it doesn't really matter if nobody is paying attention to the content -
which is a human condition; we're too busy paying attention to what's going on
inside our minds by way of reaction. C'est la
no
matter how correct you think them to be. The question is, what do you
suggest we do now?
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
I personally don't like the idea of playing nice with people whose
greatest wish is to cut my throat. The leader of the greatest and most
benevolent country in the world (I
not laugh? If you poison us do
we not die?
Harry
On 9/6/2008 5:21 PM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
The same situation is taking place as we speak. Ideology and ego have replaced
common sense, and perhaps outmoded things like honesty and decency... So we get
guys writing such stunningly
You have a point, and personally I don't go for the God gave it to us stuff,
because I can't prove it.
But I have to ask you if you live in America, and how you feel about the white
man coming in and taking over, and, if you feel bad about it - very bad about
it - if you've ever considered
Exactly.
P.
- Original Message
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2008 9:05:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Oil Gang responds
Philip sez:
...
People are where they are because it's where they
are, as part of the dream. My approach is, live
That's funny Ed,
I thought I saw President Bush holding hands with a Saudi person some time ago,
and I heard that his dad was fundamentally owned by a bunch of these Saudi
people all controlling the world's oil flows. I must have been either mistaken
or blind... These must have been Mossad
. Unfortunately, the two have
now formed an explosive mixture.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
That's funny Ed,
I thought I saw President Bush holding hands with a Saudi person some
time ago, and I heard that his dad was fundamentally owned by a bunch of
these Saudi people all controlling the world's
Steven, I can understand. I was in Pakistan a few years ago doing engineering
work (fortunately I wasn't a journalist), and I saw many men holding hands.
S'OK... as kids we all held our fathers' hands... However - and I don't want
to read too much into this - this was done in America, in the
PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2008 1:30:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Ed,
Yes - I know something of Sai Baba, the latest in a lineage of Sai
Babas. I also know a disciple who spent 25 years at his ashrama.
But Sai Baba
Ed,
I wonder if you've ever heard of a man they called the Backwoods Buddha...
Look him up on the 'Net if you're interested...
P.
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2008 7:30:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of
the case. Sai Baba says that additional men having
the same abilities are alive now in various countries and presently at
different ages who will carry the message into the future. Keep your
eyes open.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Ed,
I wonder if you've ever heard of a man they called
Of course there's a maximum number of watts per sq metre of panel available
from the sun, so that's an important factor to consider when justifying any
investment.
On the other hand, by covering a roof (and perhaps a south-facing wall) with
solar panels, the panels intercept the incoming
One thing I don't get is why solar costs so much more
than nuclear or coal fired. There's almost no moving
parts, and much less to break down, it seems to me.
There's got to be some politics in this somewhere, but
I don't know exactly where.
A broad subject... One factor is that the amount of
Yeah - even though I'm not North American by birth, I easily saw over the
years, how much the public had been sucked into Japanese (and European) car
mode. And the stupid NA auto manufacturers got just as sucked in and tried to
compete with the little 4-cyl jobs. Americans were (and as far as
It's the other story that's most likely the most interesting story...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 4:29:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Bigfoot on Mars??
Howdy Horace,
NASA loves this kinda stuff if it
faster?
Crummy night -- we just had a layoff at work (I made the cut but some
very good people didn't). So the tone of this may be a little
downbeat.
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
LOL I empathize... in all respects.
Does that make us a self-evolving species? I dunno.
Humans evolving -- hah
Hah! Few people are paid to think... at least not in the way you and I define
thinking. That's another story. Somebody took me to task (mildly for a
change) for saying that humans are not necessarily improving... But when the
word evolution is used, it implies that improvement is in the
jealous woman whos an
excellent shot with a handgun. but others im sure would sacrifice in my place)
On 12/14/07, PHILIP WINESTONE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hah! Few people are paid to think... at least not in the way you and I define
thinking. That's another story. Somebody took me to task
There are exquisitely beautiful cave paintings in France, dating back about
15000 years. There are even more exquisite paintings - again in caves in France
- dating back 35000 years. Does this indicate that perhaps there were
wonderfully cultured people over 35000 years ago, and that that
Very interesting...
...our world is just one of a countless number of parallel universes... Have
to add, each one as unreal as the next.
Hui Neng - the Sixth Patriarch of Zen - summed it all up by saying, From the
first there is nothing. The other thing is, that he talked about no-mind
LOL
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 11:27:41 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer wrote..
This topic was started off by Richard Dime box Macaulay looking for
a
loud laughter
Richard, I think you could easily vie with Yogi Berra for quotable quotes...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:08:12 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer poster excerpt..
I think that means your worm is dead., not drunk.
P.
- Original Message
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:00:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
On Nov 19, 2007 9:08 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stick
, Nick Palmer wrote:
Philip Winestone ranted
The main problem, as I believe we all know, is that the green
crowd don't want us burning ANYTHING, so the proposal to dig up
coal and use if for ANYTHING will be met with fierce resistance,
mostly by bigmouths.
See the very latest report
Are you having as good a weekend as I think you are Richard?
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:35:29 AM
Subject: [VO]: Economic models
Blank
BODY {
You don't even have to convert coal to methanol... When you consider how much
energy is used by many manufacturing processes, to name but one major energy
using sector, converting them from, say natural gas or oil would make a huge
dent in overall energy usage.
I don't know about North
@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:42:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
You don't even have to convert coal to methanol... When you consider
how
much energy is used by many manufacturing processes, to name but one
major energy using sector, converting
I read that in the Post this morning. I don't know how viable this is, but I
wish Dr. Laberge lots of luck. Seriously.
I wrote to the writer of the article, pointing him in the direction of Cold
Fusion, if only to make him aware that there's lots of other interesting work
going on in the
Jed,
Yes... when I sent my email to the journalist in question, I was very careful
to avoid talking about, or knocking the work, that this chap is doing out in
the west of Canada. I don't think it pays to malign other people's work,
unless they go over the top and start unreasonably maligning
Yes the word greed is most appropriate. Oddly enough, when I think about the
oil gang and its greed, I don't so much think of the oil companies
themselves, who do put money, time and effort into getting the stuff out of the
ground and processing it (don't all shout at me at once!!!), I think
Now THAT's interesting...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:14:58 PM
Subject: [VO]:Brown's Gas Hydrogen to steam
Blank
BODY {
EXACTLY my point of view; buying time for LENR to happen without falling under
the curse of OPEC.
P.
.
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:33:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NEW IPCC report was: Economic models
---
I've been considering what I see as the anomalous behaviour of hydrogen, ever
since I watched (from a distance of about 24 inches) a firebrick melting after
a hydrogen flame was applied to it for about 10 seconds. This was a
demonstration of something called Brown's Gas, which was apparently
with, although we more often than not deny what we're seeing or hide from it.
Human stuff.
P.
- Original Message
From: William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:58:57 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, PHILIP
Um... The scientific/rational side of me says What?
The non-rational (intuitive) side of me says, What.?
Two different whats. So there's your answer.
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:13:28 PM
: Sunday, October 7, 2007 9:50:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
How about refuse to tolerate all conscious dishonesty in ourselves?
We all lie to ourselves - mostly unconsciously - about a myriad of
things... something I won't
Interesting... Picasso's portrayal of himself publicly was, from what I've
heard, quiet different from what he really felt... which coincidentally is
exactly what that quote is about. And of course if Picasso's real intention
was to play his admirers like a fly fisherman; to soak them for
Service') also comes to mind.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: PHILIP WINESTONE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Tripod base required for LENR
Nice stuff... But kind of circular...
So in fact there's nothing to do
LOL!!
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 11:46:24 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Tripod base required for LENR
A one leg tripod footed in quicksands... m... we are not there yet ;-)
Michel
- Original
Courteously? The response is often a mirror of the original attack; perhaps
slightly less (or more) so. Since most attacks on LENR that I've seen over the
years, have been both thoroughly dishonest and thoroughly discourteous, I stand
by my original blunt and ruthless (but nonetheless honest)
How about refuse to tolerate all conscious dishonesty in ourselves?
We all lie to ourselves - mostly unconsciously - about a myriad of things...
something I won't get into in detail, but perhaps worthy of some thought.
My own view of life, including the LENR fiasco (back to LENR), is that
Well I tried to say it in a few different ways. The simple answer is that we
have to do battle with those who deliberately (consciously) lie, and
furthermore, who deliberately try to convince others that their lies are in
fact truths.
This has nothing to do with motes or logs or whatever,
As a person who does some painting, drawing, etc., I only have to look around
to attest to what Picasso was talking about; looks like most of today's artists
never read this piece... a piece which takes my breath away. I have a two-book
set on Picasso; the first book I devoured with great
Richard, I'm assuming that this pier includes the will to confront intellectual
dishonesty and graft in very blunt terms, if necessary. Once the attack is
made, the counter-attack should be focused and ruthless.
Still thinking...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL
Hmmm... the more I hear green the more I turn green when I hear the word
green.
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2007 8:42:46 AM
Subject: [VO]: Energy schemes,dime a dozen
Blank
BODY {
,dime a dozen
Monotone eventually becomes monotonous.
Harry
On 1/9/2007 8:54 AM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Hmmm... the more I hear green the more I turn green when I hear the word
green.
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent
Richard,
...feed on itself...
Does that answer your question?
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 8:42:52 AM
Subject: [VO]: Hydrogen outlook?
Blank
BODY {
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 3:14:50 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Beware of bogus history of lone mavericks
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Good points. When you consider it, measuring accurate global
temperature is a far more difficult situation than most people know
laughing Richard - did you write this inside or outside the Dime Box Saloon?
(It would sound so French if you called it the Dime Box Salon, by the way.)
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 10:08:16 PM
Subject:
speak the truth without any hint of
anything self serving.
I bet you'd have believed the tobacco lobby too.
On 6/24/07, PHILIP WINESTONE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
man-made global warming, we're in deep trouble
Hi Richard,
How inconvenient that people like you and I won't just lie down and allow
ourselves to be thoroughly programmed.
CO2 credits? Reminds me of a little piece of philosophy that one of my
fellow Glaswegian lay philosophers said: Man has an infinite capacity for
stupidity.
(I
.
Harry
On 23/6/2007 9:11 PM, PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
man-made global warming, we're in deep trouble... except for those of us who
make a lot of money from the field.
There was an interesting article today
When the rational minds at Vortex start to buy into the mythology/religion of
man-made global warming, we're in deep trouble... except for those of us who
make a lot of money from the field.
There was an interesting article today in The National Post (Canada), written
by a physicist, in which,
I keep on saying it: Bring CF to the people - both investors and users -
emphatically not the government. Once a decent application is created,
advertised and sold, the people will know what to do with it. Edison and Ford
understood that.
Keep good ideas away from the government teat.
P.
Yes - I've had a few run-ins with people who (a) have never been inside a
factory let alone gotten their hands dirty in one, and (b) have no idea what
it's like to be an hourly paid working dude, most times at the mercy of
trends. Then there's the joy of shift-work...
My own take on energy -
Actually, for the purposes of scientific argument, bollocks is much preferred.
P.
- Original Message
From: John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:27:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:to John Berry regarding GW
Balls!
On 4/24/07, PHILIP WINESTONE
Then there's the small matter of two Canadian scientists who utterly refuted
the thinking/mathematics behind the so-called hockey stick graph that showed
how much we puny humans have influenced climate since the Industrial
Revolution. These chaps have been all but totally ignored, but it's
for Bush and own stock in oil companies.
It isn't Gore making a killing, Bush has the monopoly on killing.
On 4/23/07, PHILIP WINESTONE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there's the small matter of two Canadian scientists who utterly refuted
the thinking/mathematics behind the so-called hockey stick
The warming 500 - 1000 years ago is a blip compared to what, exactly?
P.
- Original Message
From: John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Global Warning
On 4/23/07, Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only that, but Jeff didn't deny that global warming wasn't happening
(although that in itself is questionable - if we're allowed to question the
sacred GW Scriptures); he was simply saying that the evidence (evidence, mind
you) is that global warming has happened before and will happen
Richard, I bet you were going to tell us that the green stuff in their mouths
isn't tropical vegetation...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 10:14:16 AM
Subject: [VO]:Re: Global warming
Blank
BODY {
I think we should aim all the fire-hoses on earth at the sun, then say ready!
set! go! (The element of surprise is so important.).
P.
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global
The truth is that it isn't in any space - 3- or otherwise. There
really is nothing there except what we project/perceive Nth-hand and
draw conjectures from... whoever we are.
As Hui Neng said, From the first there is Nothing.
P.
At 06:20 PM 4/9/2007, you wrote:
Jones wrote...
It is not
Richard,
That somebody will be you, no doubt.
I'm a totally unknown artist, and I say that a primary is whatever
you say is a primary - seen or unseen.
I also happen to be a huge fan of black and of white - nothing and
everything - and sometimes colours just get in the way of a good
Ed - I've been following this saga only sketchily, and it only
reinforces my observation that there's an enormous number of people
who regard this world as a gigantic court of law; that everything
(every word) has to be legally justifiable. What a bore
The world is NOT like that, and I
All I know is that a few years ago I stood beside a Brown's Gas
Generator and watched in awe as a colourless flame MELTED a
firebrick in just a few seconds.
Not sure about its applicability in an internal combustion engine,
but it may be applicable in a new form of external combustion engine.
Sorry for barging into someone else's letter...
A quick question: We all seem to be fixated on excess
energy. What if one of the many innovative (or potentially
innovative) ideas were to result in an engine (a fairly simple
engine) of some sort that ***didn't*** produce excess energy, but
Or as Hui Neng said: From the first, there is nothing.
P.
At 11:37 AM 2/25/2007, you wrote:
Paul wrote:
A poll of 72 leading physicists conducted by the American
researcher David Raub in 1995 and published in the French
periodical Sciences et Avenir in January 1998 recorded that nearly
Pathological scepticism is not the same as deliberately lying to cover up
meaningful results.
P.
At 09:43 AM 2/7/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Now you mention it, anybody knows if anything positive came out of
their Toyota/Technova funded CF lab in Nice, France?
Many
Steve,
The word of the day seems to be dogma whether it be in science, art,
religion... My take on all this is to be silent - to shut my mouth - and
observe... only opening my mouth when I sense receptivity. This is where
intuition comes into play. From time to time my ego gets the better
After all that's happened, the Science Inquisition is still humming
along. I feel bad for the guy, especially as few in the media (correct me
if I'm wrong) will go out to bat for him. Hopefully I am wrong.
I myself got into, shall we say, an intense conversation today, while at
work. I
Rush Limbaugh!! That's who
P.
At 08:00 PM 2/5/2007 -0600, you wrote:
Steve Krivit wrote..
It's not so much that the mind is shut. It's a process of belief systems
and the influence of mass media.
Howdy Steven,
You have the fundamentals .. but ..CF lacks the charismatic person
Well enlighten us ! Can you name the company and the enzyme, please.
The company in Ottawa is Iogen (that's an I not an L), but I'm afraid I
didn't go so far as to find out the name of the enzyme; I've been remiss.
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectively,
I have an intuitive feeling - totally unsubstantiated - that the law of
energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's laws were to mechanics (or
physics in general).
I mean you can take a pound of any explosive and explain that the energy
from that explosive is a direct (measurable) result
Canadian smarts at work, eh Philip?
All these Canadian smarts have no idea that the eh started off (or aff)
in Glasgow, my city of origin. It's actually more like aih.
The problem with the company's approach, from some of my tentative dealings
with them, is that like a lot of such
solid investigation.
Call me a cynic...
P.
At 10:14 AM 1/21/2007 -0500, you wrote:
On 1/21/07, Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectively,
the government.)
Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything
Perfect Richard. But I still have to see Dime Box to believe it really
exists... and that it has a tavern...
P.
At 06:38 PM 1/21/2007 -0600, you wrote:
Philip wrote..
Excellent!!! How true!!! The reason is that the intent in all cases is to
indoctrinate along certain predictable lines thus
everything I'm told.
P.
At 07:50 AM 1/20/2007 -0800, you wrote:
Philip Winestone wrote:
Nobody seems to have taken notice of this process, which was pioneered by
a company in Ottawa.
Well - not exactly ! Our (USA) DOE/NREL has poured lots of its precious
(underfunded) resources into this exact
There is another way of making ethanol: from cellulose. There's a process
that uses an enzyme that converts the cellulose to sugar from which it is
converted to ethanol. The process is proven; ethanol is being produced
this way.
Nobody seems to have taken notice of this process, which was
The whole roofing situation is an expensive problem to solve. You can't
just penetrate a roof of any sort without extensive sealing, etc. All that
costs money. And even if the collectors are anchored parallel to the roof
- perhaps even attached closely to it, the risk is still there that
Kyle, I can relate totally to what you're saying having dealt with
stupidity, feigned or otherwise, when I was trying to eke out a living in
the solar energy design business (many years ago). So much for being a
highly paid consultant - a phrase usually thrown at me by overpaid,
Sorry - that was Big Bobby Clobber's line - the resident hockey player on
the Royal Canadian Air Farce:
Do unto others before they do unto you.
P.
At 05:43 PM 11/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
- Original Message - From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
The Jews got upset at Gibson's portrayal of them in the film, because it
perpetuates what is at best a myth and at worst a slander that's been going
on for 2000 years. Do yourself a favour and read James Carroll's
Constantine's Sword a book that shows just how much the Jews owe to
Constantine
Oh - and if you want to read an interesting take on the dichotomy between
talent and disgusting human beings, I suggest you read Orwell's
Benefit of Clergy. It may enlighten you.
[Aside: Sometimes I wonder how God manages to survive without people like
Mel and his trusty followers flying His
You're quite right Jones... for what it's worth, I genuinely appreciate
both your attitude and your approach.
This conversation doesn't belong here, so it should stop immediately.
Your points about unaccountable (unearned?) wealth are well taken. I've
been studying a little, the art of
Terry - perhaps there's a corollary to that law:
As you treat others, so you will be treated.
[From the alter-dimensional treatise on Galactic Federation Law]
P.
At 07:23 PM 11/12/2006 -0500, you wrote:
On 11/12/06, Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're quite right Jones
and no reaper.
no-P.
At 08:59 PM 11/12/2006 -0500, you wrote:
On 11/12/06, Philip Winestone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry - perhaps there's a corollary to that law:
As you treat others, so you will be treated.
Yes, it's called Karma, aka reap what you sow (x10).
Yours is agressive, mine
I know that Jews have been smearing him ever since he
had the gall to make a movie about the founder of his
religion, but I'm sorry to see you joining in.
What you say here says more about you than about Jews.
I'm sorry to see you joining in.
P.
At 11:46 AM 11/11/2006 -0800, you wrote:
Or you can perhaps entertain the theory that human evolution is not the
commonly-accepted straight line trend from the ape until now, at which time
we modern-day humans are at the supreme end-point (all of us) of millions
of years of positive evolution. And there's more to come... In fact
You make some excellent points. The moon mission was the highlight of our
times (aside from what the conspiracy-loons think) and the US dropped the
ball, no doubt for all sorts of political reasons. My feeling is that NASA
ultimately lost its edge as illustrated by the shuttle's nasty gasket
The message below was for Kyle... Not that the rest of the Vorts don't make
excellent points...
P.
At 07:08 AM 10/1/2006 -0400, you wrote:
You make some excellent points. The moon mission was the highlight of our
times (aside from what the conspiracy-loons think) and the US dropped the
I have a SUV (Explorer) and I love it, simply because it's the only thing
that keeps me sane driving in the long Canadian winter. Tried all kinds of
cars; the Explorer wins.
But NOBODY can answer the question I ask constantly (in fact I've been
greeted with consistently stony silence, even
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
