PCS sites can transmit close to 1500 watts per sector EIRP I believe.
They also use as many as 4 antennas per sector to help regenerate the
received signal from the sub-1 watt client handsets. Licensed WiMAX uses
many of the same power and multi-sector antenna advantages.
Scriv
George Rogato
What is a "licensed 214 carrier"?. What does that mean?
Thanks,
Scriv
Chuck wrote:
AMEN Brother ! I have been a licensed 214 carrier for over 6
yearsdomestic and international VOIP ..& I have never been
Certified..(at least not by the FCC...).
Its hard to say what is exactly needed.
Trylon = solid angle iron. No hollow tubes. I like them myself. I have
never tried the ANs discussed though. I am guessing it is a good tower
if Johnny thinks so. Hey Johnny, did you lose a Trylon during the
hurricane? Did you have an AN tower then also or is that what you
replaced the Trylon w
Get a pair of Access Points like Deliberant DLB2350 and set them to run
WDS. Also set them to WPA personal security. Set a shared key. Total
cost about $230.00.
If you want to use a little bit more security you can download
FreeRadius for either Linux or Windows XP
and set your security to
Hi guys. I just wanted you guys to know that Matt Larsen and I will be
speaking at ISPCON together. We will get you more details soon. This has
just been decided. WISPA will have a pretty big presence there I think.
I believe Tom DeReggi said he is speaking also? I know Tom is coming.
Tom, tel
We are still looking at Feb 2009 before we can use the television band
but a little over 2 years is much better than not being able to use the
channels at all. I consider this to be a victory for WISPA and this
industry. We will have to remain diligent in making sure this process
stays on track
I would think a better approach would be to work with Intel or another
company who is already building prototypes to get a test system built
and have WISPs become the operations portion of a test for this type of
technology. A converted WiFi unit will not have any of the existing GPS
or sniffin
You will need to route these links. Then it will work. The Tranzeos are
NOT transparent bridges. They do support proxy arp but this breaks a
bridge after multiple links. At least that has been my experience. Try
routed links and I bet this all works for you.
Scriv
Jason Hensley wrote:
I'm cu
kind of signal obstruction.
what do you mean by wispa officially supports?
Mario
John Scrivner wrote:
I would think a better approach would be to work with Intel or
another company who is already building prototypes to get a test
system built and have WISPs become the operations portion of a
Is OpenSER similar to Asterisk? I am a VOIP newbie so talk to me like I
am a 3rd grader! :-)
Scriv
Paul Hendry wrote:
Hi all,
This is slightly un wireless related but I was wondering if anyone else is
using OpenSER for there VoIP platform and if anyone has managed to get Cisco
Call Manager
al, and used for
the rare backhaul link.
GB wireless should be being used for mass deployment of PTP in Urban
America. For that, it needs a price point under $10 grand, in my mind.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From:
. They are PoE
enabled and include the power supply and injector.
-Hal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 10:32 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] roll your own radios..
Harold,
One more
I suppose this information would be meaningful if I had any idea what
you were talking about. Can you maybe put your thoughts into language
people can understand who do not have intimate knowledge of the product
you are discussing? I would really like to know what the differences are
between th
We won an AWS license in our area!
:-)
Scriv
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
FCC wireless auction raises almost $13.9 bln
Last Update: 5:13 PM ET Sep 18, 2006
(Adds quote in third paragraph and details about Verizon in sixth and
seventh paragraphs.)
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The Federal Communicatio
Thank you Patrick and Alvarion. Having you as a supporter of this
industry is a big help.
Scriv
Patrick Leary wrote:
Having received John Scrivner's specific approval, I offer the following
note:
Dear WISPA members,
I wanted to drop you folks a note that Alvarion has challenged me to get
bac
arman wrote:
CONGRATS Scriv!
I don't think that you will be guilty of just "squatting"
on such lovely frequency eh?
Did you get 700MHz in the AWS-1?
I wish I had some too :-(
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf O
I agree with you Blair. Trouble is the .gov money will not be going
away. I do my best to make sure I get some since it will be going
someplace. I don't have to have that money in order to make it in
business. I just do not know why I would let it go to others when it is
available to people jus
We need someone to fund our WISPA meeting room and reception at ISPCON.
Many of the board will be there. You think Alvarion could do that? We
could make you the official sponsor and let you open the meeting with a
few words?
Let me know,
Scriv
Patrick Leary wrote:
Looks like I will attend,
I don't buy that. We won in this last Illinois grant and Verizon lost.
Scriv
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
It's not going to go away... Rather, it's going to start going only to the
in ILEC's, etc. As part of the "accountability" demands, you'll find that
smaller, startups, and non-monopolies wil
As you guys know my company was having some serious speed and
reliability issues with our existing Trango backhaul some time back. We
have about 25 tower locations in Southern Illinois which until recently
were all fed from these Trango radios. We had countless short outages,
signal irregularit
Here is an idea for a federal policy plan to end the broadband access
problems. How about Base Station Licenses instead of 10,000 square mile
licenses like we do now. Anyone could buy a Base Station License. Heaven
forbid a regular person should be allowed to compete with a Megasuck.net
RBOC! S
Mac! Let's turn the temperature of this debate down a few degrees. You
guys are taking a quick trip to Flamesville here. You can drive your
point home without driving it into someone's backside. Let's be civil here.
Thanks,
Scriv
Mac Dearman wrote:
Mark Koskenmaki:
Am I missing something
Please know that I am not really trying to trash Trango here. They are
still a viable product in some situations. Alvarion is simply so much
better that it warranted this upgrade. Obviously for heavily used links
feeding towers to other towns I think Trango multipoint is a bad option.
I have no
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Scriv,Congrads on the spectrum win.
Thank you.
What are you doing about equipment to operate in that spectrum range?
That is the $100,000 question right now. 802.16e for mobility and fixed
wireless is designed strictly for TDD use. I have paired frequencies
which are
sh me luck. I'll need it. :-)
Scriv
Matt Liotta wrote:
I wouldn't think you would be required to use FDD. 802.16e supports
varying channel widths, so you could for example deploy a multi-point
system with two 10Mhz channels or six 3Mhz channels all TDD.
-Matt
John Scrivner wrote:
This is what I would buy to replace a fiber in this case:
http://www.alvarion.com/B100/?ref=wispabanner
Scott Reed wrote:
I have a potential customer that is looking to replace a fiber link
with wireless. Need best recommendation for a 1.5mile clear LOS
shot. Bridge as it is to replace a
Not to beat the horse here but I think having SNR, RSSI and Noise
readings are all things people should have in an advanced platform.
Granted if you have any two you can get the third but just having it all
right there seems logical to me. I am guessing the system could easily
derive all three
For the record, my use of Alvarion is to feed high-end business
customers and towers only at this time. I still cannot make a business
case for Alvarion for SoHo and Resi. I do not plan to make that move
until I see Alvarion has a way to make that pay. A 24 to 36 month ROI
does not work for res
I think maybe this thread is getting unproductive. Let's either move on
to other vendor specific issues that are new or move on to another thread.
Scriv
Brad Larson wrote:
Brad Belton, Respectfully, there are 100's of wisp's proving you wrong. OFDM
in UL has its place and making blanket state
Brad and Brad. You guys are getting boringsaying the same drivel
over and over. PLEASE either take your broken record off line or say
something original.
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
Hello Brad,
I think you are missing the point of the thread here. The point is to offer
up constructive cri
Please forgive my outburst of rude, brash behavior here. I had a bad day
and I should know better than to type while I am mad!
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
Brad and Brad. You guys are getting boringsaying the same drivel
over and over. PLEASE either take your broken record off line or say
Too funny! So her name is Dottie Rasnake? Is that last name pronounced
like "Ray Snake"? Did Dottie move that there tractor herself?
:-)
Scriv
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
I present a completely unaltered trouble ticket from this morning:
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Mumm via RT
[m
I do not know why the radios in 60, 70 and 80 GHz are not in the $5K per
pair range. They can be built in that price range with plenty of profit
and the rate of sales would likely be 100 times what they are now. I
have tried to find a way to justify buying these radios but right now
fiber is a
Contact me offlist if you serve Findlay, Ohio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scriv
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Hello Alex. I am sorry you have had trouble posting to our list. Please
send the error you receive when you try to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he
will get it fixed. I am copying the list with your information.
Sincerely,
John Scrivner
Alex Huppenthal wrote:
John,
Since I my posts to
*We will get those TV channels but it will be a LONG wait. I certainly
hoped we would see this before 2009. Here is information from Comm
Daily's Telecom AM Today:
FCC BANS MARKETING WHITE-SPACE DEVICES
PRE-DTV DEADLINE*
Although the FCC has allowed use of wireless devices designed to operate
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'John Scrivner' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John:
I do not know if you watch the list on Tower-Pro or not, but this rescue
was up in Indiana, and it was required by a company called Advanced
Computers & Communications Systems. I am learning over the past few
Addison, MI 49220
Phone: (517)547-8410
Mobile: (517)605-4542
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
*From:* John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I am not familiar with the terms you describe below and I am a bit
confused. Can you break this down with a little more detail and
explanation? I would like to understand this as I think it is very
important for us to know what they are trying to do here in 900 MHz.
Thank you,
John Scrivner
If you have an adjacent channel carrier which is running hundreds of
watts of power then you may not have a choice of whether to use the
bandpass filter or not. Your system may not operate in the upper part of
the 900 MHz band. What happens is that the adjacent carrier will "swamp"
your receive
This has been our plan all along. It just will not stay screwed up long
enough to get a single heading. The signal level of the interference
looks like data but it varies in level so much that finding the heading
is not easy. I know spectrum analysis and this one has me stumped. I
wish it would
Good info Jack. In a past life I was a headend tech in the cable
television industry. and I also performed signal egress and ingress
troubleshooting using a Hewlett Packard 8591B analyzer. I spent a few
thousand hours on this tool and learned much about spectrum analysis at
that time. Here is s
Mac,
We believe this is truly an outside offender in 2.4 GHz. I have
personally seen a carrier that is several times more power than anything
I have ever seen. I only saw it for a brief instant though. This
interference just does not last long enough to be caught. The high
latency is caused by
We have analyzers already. Thanks for the offer though.
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Send a call tag over and we'll ship you my SA. LEAVE it at one of the
towers. You'll want a sectored antenna on it. 120* for starters.
When the noise hits move to another direction with th
In this particular situation the client (tenant) was owner of both ends
(base station and CPE) I think. Correct me if I am wrong. I seem to
remember reading that the airline wanted a private WiFi network for
themselves. The airport (landlord) was trying to prevent this. In this
type of a situat
Dawn,
Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs
involving this proceeding? I am doubting it as much as I would like to
know your personal thoughts on the subject. Kris Twomey looked into this
for me some time back and told me it is of no concern for WISPs. If you
se
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Dawn,
Could you tell us what interest you believe there should be for WISPs
involving this proceeding? I am doubting it as much as
ensed bands but makes
926 and above useless. See ... ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders (FCC-06-110)
Actually I was told that th
II band via dual-band usage may be more
troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC band usage.
Rich
----- Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB
y motorist into wanting an OBU (DOT
hates trying to mandate equipment for all new vehicles, something that
the public will "want on their own" is much preferred). Hope that
makes sense.
Rich
- Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &q
I prefer to speak for myself regarding MVN policy on overtime since I
run the company. We do not work our salaried staff like sled dogs
regardless of the way Dave may have been misunderstood in his message.
Dave did include a smiley face which was supposed to indicate he was
joking. I have neve
se of
an outage, thus avoiding management having to hunt someone down on a
sat. nite to work an outage.
c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] on
I m still waiting on the copy from Alvarion. Once I get it you will get it.
Thanks!
Scriv
Paul Hendry wrote:
Did it not get sent to the list? Anyone forward it offlist?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Hensley
Sent: 13 November 20
WISPA has a new paid Principle WISP Member, welcome Marshall Craw of
Rabbit Meadows Technology. WISPA requires funding in order to operate
and to lobby for our industry. We appreciate those of you who recognize
this and help us with your time and money. Here is an introduction for
our newest WI
Bob,
Tell us about your experiences with these. Work as advertised?
Approximate cost per pair?
Thanks,
Scriv
Bob Moldashel wrote:
Just looking for experiences
Personally I think they rock but just looking to see if anyone else
has any pros/cons
www.exaltcom.com
100 Mb FD 2.4 Ghz
We have seen quite a bit of interest in new membership in WISPA lately.
I am proud to announce that Travis Johnson has added his name to the
list of WISP operators who have joined WISPA. Travis has a very
successful operation and I am sure his involvement in WISPA will be
valuable to us and to
This is a neutral place so feel free to share the guy you know so we all
know who it is. If you have a vested interest then just say so and we
will all pummel you for being a spammer! :-) jkPlease do share
who you know that can help.
Thanks,
Scriv
Ken Chipps wrote:
FSO is rock solid
I heard Eje telling folks at ISPCON that the chip that selects the
antenna port for diversity on that module (I believe) was VERY sensitive
to static discharge. Someone mentioned seeing about 20 db of attenuation
when it fries. It sounds like you may have seen this first hand? Eje, if
you ar
ETINC works great but so do several other lower-cost options which do
not include dealing with an abusive vendor. Are you going to buy him out
Charles? :-)
Scriv
Charles Wu wrote:
Wanted to get people's opinion of ETINC
It's been some time since Dennis has publically flogged anyone but
cu
I hope all of you have a wonderful Thanksgiving. I have plenty of
blessings to be thankful for. I bet we all do. Thank you guys for being
here.
Warmest regards,
Scriv
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: ht
delivering HIPAA compliant
connections or those who provide equipment which has been documented to
meet HIPAA compliance.
Thank you,
John Scrivner
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org
over again
Good luck
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-----
From: John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:16:51
To:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Wireless Security biting you in the ass?
Wireless broadband security issues hav
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HIPPA compliance should beUp to the network administrator. Not the
carrier IMHO.
This is not a matter of opinion. It is factual.
I never doubted this. I just need to find someway to make the corporate
people believe they can use my wireless
If I get a sit-down with the HIPAA compliance officer for the hospital
here I am going to need to get someone else on the phone with them who
is knowledgeable about HIPAA compliance who can help me sell the idea
that wireless can be used in HIPAA compliant data transmission systems.
Would yo be
I thought this was offlist. All apologies.
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
If I get a sit-down with the HIPAA compliance officer for the hospital
here I am going to need to get someone else on the phone with them who
is knowledgeable about HIPAA compliance who can help me sell the idea
that
I need your help! It looks like I am going to have to go over the head
of the IT guy at the area hospitals. According to the person I am
speaking with I cannot even get a phone call returned from him to talk
about the issues regarding wireless broadband delivery and HIPAA. The
say flat out no u
How can you do 5 meg per client on 900 MHz? You would have to have
several times that speed available per sector. Are you using the whole
900 MHz band on one sector? If yes then how do you stop
self-interference on adjacent sectors?
Scriv
Rick Smith wrote:
I thought about the same things.
Many outside radios suffer from RF radiation over the Ethernet. I have
personally seen this on the YDI Etherant and the Trango FOX. This
problem is not specific to any one manufacturer. The cable acts as a
transmit antenna, carrying the clock signals from internally to the
outside. This can be
.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients
Many outside radios suffer from RF radiation over the Eth
Just to be clear. When I stated that I had heard that the RB532 was
causing some interference out of band I was not trying to discredit
Mikrotik or their products. I had read the thread below earlier. That
was what had led to my belief that this board was creating some out of
band interference
forward to working with you.
Kindest regards,
John Scrivner
President
WISPA
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Tom DeReggi wrote:
The big thing here is... Is one selling revenue or selling a network?
Both. No way around it.
If one is selling revenue, the buyer could probably care less what
allows the revenue to happen.
I have been looking at other WISPs around me for possible merge /
acquisition a
Tom, I do not mind having my posts clipped for content when replying but
I do mind it when you do it mid-sentence and change what I said. My
sentence read, "Nobody in unlicensed is going to get 6X unless they have
a network doing 10s of millions of dollars a year in revenues or a
smaller networ
I am betting the goodwill will buy you much business in the future. I
know I tend to get more customers from taking a fair and equitable
stance with my customers on issues. You did a good thing. Merry Christmas!
Scriv
Jenco Wireless wrote:
Thanks everyone. The customer e-mailed back and sai
Replies below:
Matt Liotta wrote:
Guys,
We are now exceeding Orthogon's capacity on a regular basis.
Wow! Business must be good!
We are backhauling as much as we can with fiber, but that isn't an
option in the suburbs. We have had good success with BridgeWave's
products, but the distance
In the WISP industry there are a few names that stick out as being
companies who have been true friends to WISPs over the years. One of the
names that truly tops the list is ImageStream. If you need a router then
these guys have one that will do the job well, whatever the job is. The
amazing th
Can you explain this in more detail? I am not quite following you on this.
Thanks,
Scriv
Mario Pommier wrote:
Marlon,
You can make all your mail traffic go through Postini without being
charged more, and you can still charge the customer the $1 fee for usage.
And, yeah, people do like.
It is not WiMax but a similar proprietary fixed wireless platform which
takes advantage of OFDM, higher power and exclusive use of bandwidth in
2.5 GHz. It was created before there was WiMax. I have never used the
product but have heard others speak favorably of it.
Scriv
Gino A. Villarini wr
please show your support.
Signup today.
Thanks guys,
John Scrivner
President
WISPA
Charles Wu wrote:
Aren't the current WISP dues like $250 ish / year? (that really isn't that
much)
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Nea
If you need 100 megabit Cat 5 performance then it is best to terminate
on 110 blocks instead of 66 blocks. That is what I was always told in
the past. I have no proof other than what others told me. Can anyone
else confirm or deny?
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
Yep, standard 25pr 66 blocks mount
This has more to do with malicious behavior than whether unlicensed has
protections. I have argued with others over the years that if you
intentionally do harm then you are liable even if that intentional
behavior to cause harm is with unlicensed frequencies. Looks like that
hypothesis holds tr
If email becomes that important then your business becomes worth more
money. I welcome it personally. Obviously we will all need to
investigate ways of creating a more stable email environment than we
have now. I think we will need to consider developing a "pay per email"
platform where message
I do not think any WISPs here really know the answer to this. What is
needed is an answer from an accountant. If anyone on here is a CPA and
can share what the rules are I would be glad to see them. I do not
believe that simply drawing profits from a S corp WISP as opposed to
taking a salary is
Yes. We earn salary and profits. It is not as much as I would like but
our company is profitable and has been for 9 years.
Scriv
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Is this all such a big deal? You guys actually have profits!?
Brian
John Scrivner wrote:
I do not think any WISPs here really know the
I am glad to hear things are going well! Best of luck and way to go!
Scriv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick note to let EVERYONE know that I stood up my first paying
customer this week! The Tranzeo gear goes in real easy and so far (knock on
my wooden head) works great! Thanks to all wh
The Alvarion VL is great for bursty, best effort requirements where 90% of
the user applications can wait for that clear air within the noise floor,
but not for committed rate business class service.
Best,
Brad
Brad, I see your almost continuous negative posts about VL and cannot
help bu
e the product
IMPROVED! What is so wrong with that?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 12:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
I think Patrick needs to build Lonnie a box. Star OS software / Alvarion
radio. Look out!
:-)
Scriv
Patrick Leary wrote:
Lonnie, you are just doing what I wish I were smart enough to do --
write code people are willing to pay for. Software is always better than
hardware: you avoid FCC hassles
What about using external antennas? Doesn't that require FCC
certification? I agree with everything you have said below with the
exception of use of external antennas and amplifiers of course. I
thought you needed a FCC system certification for systems made up of a
radio and external pigtails,
Hey Joe. Can you give us an update on what is going on down your way?
Are you selling a bunch of connections? What gear are you deploying?
How well is the area recovering? Any information is appreciated.
Cheers,
Scriv
Joe Laura wrote:
As far as I know all their wireless gear was removed fro
for consideration before using. You can register as a member by
going to signup.wispa.org.
Thank you,
John Scrivner
Digineer wrote:
John,
I was looking across the net for sample roof rights leases and saw your
comment from Feb 06. Are you still making it available to WISP members? If
so
Wow. I have been interviewed many times. I do not ever recall seeing
anything so flattering printed about me or Mt. Vernon. Net. Thanks for
the kind words from all of you.
What I really want to see is the day we all work for the goals of WISPA
to the point that the entire WISP industry is gett
I tend to disagree. I WILL own one and I suspect it will become my
primary communications device in my life.
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
We'll have to wait and see. I think that this will mostly be a niche
product. The ipod folks might like it most, but there are a LOT of
I always like sending out messages like this because it is
representative of why we have a trade association. Denise Miller from
ISPCON (aka. The Golden Group) just sent me a note to let us know she
wants to see some WISPA involvement in their next show. This helps
ISPCON with attendance and he
We are seeing more momentum toward new paid membership in WISPA and I
really appreciate that. The latest WISP operator to join is Greg Coffey
of Alluretech / Coffeynet. I am sure I speak for all of us in saying
welcome to Greg and thank you for your support to our industry. Here are
a few words
Hire an attorney, get copies of what customers signed from an existing
customer of his. Give it to the attorney along with the brief letter you
got from the guy saying he was calling it quits. I see no need to let
the CPE go to waste if you can make it work provided there is no legal /
civil re
Dawn,
700 MHz availability is a big deal for us. Can you please take the
points in this article apart and let us know what you know about what is
going on here? If funds are available which could help us gain licensed
spectrum then knowing the inside scoop on this process is a big deal and
cou
Killing the FCC would simply place the responsibility for the regulatory
control of the spectrum in the US to another federal agency. Not sure I
buy into the idea that one fed agency (even if created from scratch) can
do things better than what we have now.
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
You know th
grasp
on his head than to wander around him in the dark wondering from where
and how he may strike.
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
Killing the FCC would simply place the responsibility for the
regulatory control of the spectrum in the US to another federal
agency. Not sure I buy into the idea
The government cannot request data with a note saying it is confidential
and then turn around and say it is not. That is not going to fly. If my
data is shared with others then I will file suit against the FCC myself.
Peter, how can you possibly support the idea that it is ok for
confidential d
601 - 700 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
