I have moved west, and Dennis Cravens is just a couple miles away. I
visited him recently. In his lab he still has long term tests operating
with his spheres (of course, along with other experiments in progress). He
said that he charged a HydroStik and then froze it at dry ice temperature.
At
Dennis did not explicitly say that an H D mix was required, but I believe
that his theory and his own experiments have led him to mostly use a 50:50
mix in his present experiments. He showed me a Ni based experiment that he
had setup, which he turned on while I was visiting. Before I left, his
I just received my copy of Ed's new book and I am reading it now. Too early
to review, but it is hard to stop reading.
On Jul 14, 2014 8:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: / /An Examination of the
Relationship between Observation and
0.1, pretty much a non-starter from the beginning.
What is the motivation to do this experiment? Unless Mills can demonstrate
a much higher COP to optical photons, this will never be gainful.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13
to hear your comments.
Bob Higgins
, if deuterium enrichment is found in analysis of Rossi's 6-month
test (don't know if they will be allowed to test for this), then it would
be a very insightful report.
I could easily have bungled this proposition. Please set me straight.
Bob Higgins
Jones,
I think you did not understand or agree with what I said previously in
bullet 4).
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Bob Higgins
Consider that the DDL state is regarded as being about 511
keV less than H
, it seems plausible that such resonant structures could
absorb a significant amount of energy and elevate fractional state hydrogen
atoms to a state closer to ground state.
Bob Higgins
of thermodynamics to embrace your scenario.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I completely disagree Axil, the Mizuno endothermic (or Ahern endothermic)
observation is not at all catastrophic.
You said:
This contemplation of an endothermic mechanism
features
on the Ni.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Rossi claims that he uses nano-nickel particles. I have no idea what
the sintering and melting temperatures of those structures. We know that
carbon nano structures have very good high
the
formation of NAE as cracks as Ed Storms describes, and maybe even the
magnetic traps as described by Yeong Kim. I wrote a paper about this
processing. If you are interested, private email me and I will send you a
copy. It was posted to Vortex before.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:09 AM
What I meant is that Rossi doesn't make is own starting (un-catalyzed) Ni
particles, he buys them. The Ni powder he buys is produced by the
manufacturer from precipitation of liquid nickel tetracarbonyl. The powder
produced by this process is just pure Ni having a high external surface
area in a
I believe Peter Hagelstein is excited about the Karabut result because he
believes that Karabut demonstrates high energy x-ray photons being
synthesized by a collective sum of much lower energy lattice phonons. If
it is possible for this up-conversion to occur, then it lends credibility
to his
The problem is that after the high energy gamma is created, it is not
plausible that 100% of the quanta are downshifted - some will fail in this
post-fusion downshifting and be released as high energy. Since 0% high
energy quanta are seen experimentally, the high energy quanta must not get
I did not think I originated it, but I am convinced of it. This came up in
particular for the proposed shielding effect by WL. It is a similar issue.
Once the atom is excited with high energy to be released very quickly, it
is difficult for pretty much any de-excitation mechanism to be 100%
that the vacuum is not linear at the scales of elementary particles. Once
the nonlinearity is invoked at that scale, there may be wave-to-wave
coupling.
Bob Higgins
to adequately account for the ejecta in the control vs. actual experiment.
Why is Mills suddenly able to claim a high COP?
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
I certainly do not dispute the long list of prior BLP predictions
That explanation is completely faulty. Did the visible spectrum escape the
calorimeter? If not, it was all converted to heat and should have been
measured.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
How about this...
The calorimeter only measures the heat
will believe a credible demo
when I see it reported. I won't believe speculation - but - cogent
speculation does deserve to be investigated.
LENR has been demonstrated at high currents. See the Santilli papers and
Kadeisvili's replication of his transmutation work.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Jul 26
, then they
would also have been measured by the calorimeter. To escape the
calorimeter would require high energy x-rays and a lot of these would also
have been measured to a lesser efficiency.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote
starting to final position may be much
shorter than the period of an x-ray.
Bob
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
When you speak of the plasma fusion output channels, I like
be correct about the fractional
quantum states of hydrogen and they may be complicit in LENR. But he would
lose a lot of his patent value if the heat were proved to actually be
coming from LENR.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember
could easily have been closer to 1. This is an extremely difficult
modified calorimeter to calibrate. Perhaps when Mills makes the arc source
small enough to fit entirely in the calorimeter (except for some tiny
capacitor charging wires), it will be possible to get an accurate
measurement.
Bob
:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 30, 2014 1:28 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner?
I thought it was important to say more explicitly why I believe the
Mills demo calorimetry may be flawed. I hope the enclosed
across the experiment even though the gas total mass declined.
- The excess heat does seem to correlate with Mizuno's total gas
quantity curve and the M/e=2 curve which look similar.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Apparently, many
you propose.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
I have a few observations that are not being discussed here (and I may be
missing something) from the slides from the MIT Colloquium.
· *The report
and
also molecular fragmentation.
Thanks for stimulating me to take a closer look at QMS.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
The quadrapole mass spec RGA will have a front end ionizer to extract an
ionized sample
which could behave more like condensed matter - but that would just
be a guess. The simpler answer is that the f/H states are probably not the
explanation for the observation.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:51 PM
Jones, Do you have a reference for Naudts' paper? It would be interesting
to get Yeong Kim's take on this. Some time ago, he published a paper
refuting the existence of any stable f/H state.
Eigenvectors, in a linear system, are a complete basis for
expansion/description of any driven solution
enough for the disassociation he claims is required.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jones.
Regarding Mills and titanium fuel. Anyone have a sense the degree to
which he has specially prepared the particles with water?
I'm wondering about
In the diagram in the TechCrunch article, they talk about fusing deuterium
and helium. A deuterium-deuterium fusion would produce copious neutrons
and is highly undesirable. They want charged particles to enable direct
conversion to electrical. The Wikipedia page says they have published
a computer to evaluate the
solution space numerically without simplifying assumptions.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Cook
Jones, do you know what they said about the possible reactions in the ref
7 document noted above
with and without a magnet being present in the chamber.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be pretty cool. On occasion I've looked for the Piantelli
anecdote, which I read somewhere, but I haven't succeeded yet in tracking
it down.
to be exposed without a
window or a good high pressure window needs to be found that will pass this
low energy range of photons that can withstand high H2 pressure.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Bob Higgins
. However, LENR at 1,000,000x
would be even better.
Bob Higgins
P.S.: Terry, Thank you for posting Vavra's presentation.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Sooner or later, CMNS will also pick up on a most important factoid about
the DDL – which has been
Bob,
Can you explain the reference to 13 that you made here? I am confused as
to the reference.
Thanks, Bob
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bob --
If I understood the last paper from 13 the folks from Los Alamos wrote,
commenting on the Kim
.
But, the speculation was interesting.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Another wild thought on nuclear “faux-transmutation.”
If a DDL can displace an inner electron of some elements (K or L shell)
then the resultant species will possibly
). Physics LAWS are just rules of thumb
that have proved to be valid most of the time (perhaps all of the time in
our historical experience, but that does not make them inviolable).
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:19 PM
paper (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0833v3.pdf) -
I think it is a fascinating fit to this thread. If someone else already
cited this, I apologize for the duplication.
Bob Higgins
. It is just showing that the ferrite slab is permanently magnetized.
However, if a permanent magnet is used as a transformer core, I am not sure
what the result would be. It would certainly be nonlinear. In a passive
device reciprocity is not guaranteed if a DC magnetic field is present.
Bob
create a second domain near the surface to cancel the field there, so that
above the slab is a field divergence to hold the pin in place. This
levitation demonstration seems to be just spectacle and I cannot see how it
would be related to energy production.
Bob Higgins
Also see:
*http://www.rfcafe.com/references/radio-news/subminiature-magnetic-amplifiers-dec-1957-radio-tv-news.htm
http://www.rfcafe.com/references/radio-news/subminiature-magnetic-amplifiers-dec-1957-radio-tv-news.htm*
Bob
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
. There
may be a thermomagnetic heat pumping effect involved in the cooling effect
of the core.
Bob
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Bob Higgins
I am convinced of this connection: if one can document a cooling effect in
a
transformer core
will need to
stir the water and measure the water in multiple points. You will need an
insulated container.
Either that, our you need to be good at telling stories about the big fish
that got away (is this Mills?).
BTW, I applaud your efforts.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Jack
is uncomfortable with doing this, they shouldn't try
it! Protect yourself!
Bob
On Aug 26, 2014 8:49 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you embed the electrodes reasonably well into the water, you may be
able
-
it is meticulous work.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jumping over the precipice, you will need to use one of the big copper
arms as a current shunt. Connect a lead across two points on one arm. Use
another calibrated source to run X
has
done, which is with an input of about 200 joules.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a point.
Though my view is, it may not be worth making these elaborate
modifications. Are we striving for superaccuracy, or are we just
pulse needed to create
a 5 joule ignition. I think there is no chance to verify a 5 joule
ignition with this spot welder setup.
Best case is to replicate what Mills has done with ~200 joule input and
with better calorimetry (for example, doing it with the electrodes under
water).
Bob Higgins
On Wed
It would appear that you are not qualified to say that calorimetry using
water is a non-starter. First, in DI water there is no electrolyte added
(just the opposite) and there will be no current flowing through this water
being used to capture the heat and thermalize the UV. The DI water has no
You do not appear to know what you are talking about; except in one
respect: You are correct that it is Jack's experiment and his course of
action is absolutely his choice.
My inputs to this topic are terminated. I have no intention to
contributing to this becoming a flame like some of the
through
containers.
- Most agree that if two DDL hydrogen isotope atoms form a DDL molecule,
they will fuse immediately (within 10's of picoseconds).
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jones--
Thanks for that repeat.
I missed
This is in part because Va'vra hypothesizes that it may be possible to
produce DDL transitions with multiple photons. If multiple photons are
involved, there is nothing to insure that all photon components would come
out in the same direction (like a laser). Hence, you would have to
integrate
/uploads/2014/08/power-measurement.png
I won't be able to do 10 amps for calibration, but I can do anything up to
5 amps with my lab power supply.
Best regards,
Jack
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jack,
You are on the verge of the LENR
While Va'vra is recently trying to connect the 511 keV galactic signal with
DDL hydrogen, his theory about multi-photon DDL transitions is older. He
has been doing work with spark discharge in hydrogen and uses a large
cylindrical scintillator with an axial hole to look for coincident
detection
Hi Jack,
I have created some diagrams to help communicate the setups that I am going
to describe. It on my Google drive at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2MTlIX1pwMC1PdHc/edit?usp=sharing
These setups presume that when you measure between the high current bars
and the pins of
One more facet of the DDL connection is that chemically bound DDL molecules
are entirely possible - such as D^D and D^D^. Meulenberg proposes that
these pico-molecules will fuse in 10s of picoseconds. It is likely
that pico-molecules could form inside of Ed Storms' hydroton. These
be responsible for the Pd-D data. It doesn't mean
that DDL is not a part of the puzzle, just not the whole puzzle. Maybe it
is a bigger part of the puzzle in Ni-H(D).
Jones, you are standing on a stool with only 1 leg - you have more juggling
to do to substantiate your position.
Bob Higgins
On Sun
Hi Jack,
That is unfortunate. We need to find a schematic for this spot welder or
open it up and create one. It could be the secondary is just grounded to
the ground pin. If so, we need to know how it is grounded. Ground loops,
when such high currents are involved, can ruin your test
between possible DDL transitions and nuclear effects.
Bob Higgins
energy to enter the DDL state, that energy would have to be given to the
other electrons. That energy is so great as to completely ionize the atom
for small atomic number. I can't quite wrap my head around how this can
happen.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:30 AM, H Veeder hveeder
Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
So many egregious errors ... so little time to correct them all...
Bob Higgins: This business of Rossi using a radioactive ingredient is a
Bozo
speculation based on absolutely nothing. And Rossi is not the only
Focardi, the father of 'Ni-H Cold
Fusion'; Radio Citta del Capo - Bologna - Italy.
You can get it off of my Google drive at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2VHhPQ0paM1dvME0/edit?usp=sharing
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote
on radioactive
additives. Doesn't mean they wouldn't have an effect on the reaction, I
just don't think Rossi uses any.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Note
could have gone back to one of those other
chemistries to build the higher temperature hotCat.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
About the H2 pressure and the mean free path of monoatomic hydrogen -- I'm
curious whether you've seen anything
Hi Eric,
Nice spreadsheet. I like how it captures a lot of considerations in one
place.
Have you considered adding the reactions that would include a delta in
atomic number of 2N? Seems like there were trends in experiment reports
showing transmutations by integer multiples of 2 in atomic
/0B5Pc25a4cOM2dzRreW14cWVlazg/edit?usp=sharing
Let me know if you have trouble accessing or viewing these .png image files.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
open mind.
Ni-H could well be different. We will just have to wait for more data.
Mizuno is just a good data point with its own flaws and insights.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I’m sorry but that is not what Miles seems to be saying now
the many experiments is due to a process other
than fusion or transmutation.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø Your attempt to dismiss the Claytor tritium results as being high
voltage is again specious. The voltages
is
occurring in the condensed matter prior to the condensed matter being
evaporated and turned into a plasma?
Bob Higgins
in a radiant explosion. There may be no singularity inside the
event horizon - the physics inside does not obey our known laws, and in
some similarity to the nucleus of the atom, the nature of the inside of the
event horizon is nearly impossible to probe.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:43
think Rossi is pursuing a course needed to build a business - he
is right to try. But I believe that even if his patent is granted, it will
be useless in protecting his product.
I also agree that Rossi has failed to completely disclose his invention.
He is in a real catch-22.
Bob Higgins
On Sun
electronic coupling (though it is
mostly nearest neighbor coupling). This coupled structure is there to
begin with - it is not formed ad hoc just for fractionating.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The almost intractable problem for explaining
in some thermal collisions - at a much greater rate
than with H. Could such thermal collisions with a ubiquitous Df/H be
responsible for observed but unexplained spontaneous radioactive decay?
What other behaviors would be expected of a ubiquitous Df/H gas? What
would refute its existence?
Bob
-inflate, and Df/H would need something like 500keV. So, hydrinos
would find some ppm of re-inflation on the tail of the Boltzmann curve, but
the Df/H atoms would not. Long before you got to a 500keV collision, the
Df/H would fuse with its collision target.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:32
none to escape the hotCat because
the reaction is in a Faraday cage. The RF that could penetrate would have
to be below 1 kHz.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hoped for prediction – but unlikely due to technical limitations: evidence
I have posted the cross-section of the hotCat as I have surmised it to be
constructed. The active medium is entirely in a hermetically sealed
stainless coaxial tube arrangement. The reactor vessel itself IS the
Faraday cage. It is not a part of the test, it is a part of the hotCat.
Bob Higgins
reactor vessel (as shown in the Penon report) and seal its ends.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
NMR is caused by the vibration of the non-zero spin vector of a nucleus.
This vibrating nuclear spin produces a vibrating magnetic field.
The point
be killing everyone around the
reactor. Any few neutrons detected externally are definitely a useful clue
about internal reactions, but fortunately few neutrons are ever detected.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:57 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
A small diameter membrane to allow
be prevented from escaping from Rossi's hotCat by the hermetic stainless
steel reactor enclosure acting as a Faraday cage. There will be no
propagating RF escaping from the Rossi's reactor vessel. There is only the
possibility of low frequency evanescent fields escaping.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3
frequencies would escape in a
measurable way - given the thickness of the reactor metal (probably on the
order of 1.5mm) above 100 kHz would probably be considered high frequency.
And, as previously stated, about 6dB more will come out at 1000C than at
room temp.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014
for photon
transaction.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Bob, Eric
Actually – if you remember from TP1, the Swedes did test the powder with
XRF.
They did not report any UV signature. They should have if Mills reaction
is involved as you
, the catalyst will still absorb and re-emit the input photon or
fluoresce in longer wavelengths. What you would really like to see is
photons going into the catalyst and no energy coming out at the same or
longer wavelength. This is an exceedingly hard test to make with
unequivocal results.
Bob
the theories describing f/H
say there can be no direct photon transactions. If the theory is wrong,
then there is no basis for f/H states to begin with and you have no story
at all for where the 55 eV came from.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From
Sorry about your caffeine deficit, but 10g of Ni doesn't cost more than a
barrel of oil. A kilogram of Ni powder I use was sent to me as a sample.
No one would sample 100 barrels of oil. Ni is cheap.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
IOW 10 grams of nickel
sinter into larger particles at high temperature (600C). If
nano-Ni was found to be required, it will be painful to make something work
at high temperature for long periods. Nano-Ni might be OK for hand warmers.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote
uses this technique to expose nano features after partial
sintering by oxidation/reduction with a final step of reduction. I start
with larger particles, add nano-Fe2O3, and then go through stages of
thermal oxidation and reduction.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:01 PM, mix...@bigpond.com
catalysts for the hotCat as
part of getting it up to higher temperature. Then he added his mouse to
improve the COP. I think the mouse was a first stage using his original
recipe (likening Rossi to Colonel Sanders :) ).
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote
be nano-scale and
still operate at a temperature that would otherwise sinter powders of that
scale. I don't think the zeolite itself otherwise contributes to the LENR.
I would be happy to have someone with greater chemical background
straighten me out if these understandings are wrong.
Bob Higgins
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have been working with. The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
hydride supplying only H2 and not D.
Bob Higgins
) to help excite his
reaction. Yet, since there is mention that the reaction will continue in
the OFF mode (but they didn't use that), it is clear that these excitations
are not required to sustain the reaction.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote
transmutation is probably less probable than what Norman Cook proposes.
Rossi apparently raves about Norman's theory.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Er,
s/Ni68/Ni62/g
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson [mailto:vortex-h
for this too.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Sorry – but this reactor is made of alumina – which is a proton conductor.
Beta alumina is among the best proton conducting ceramics but you would
never use any form of alumina if you wanted
temperature insulated mounting system?
- Why do we think the 3-phase drive is used?
- What else?
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
1% lithium in 1g fuel, so 0.01g, boils at 1342°C. At 1 bar,1342°C would
fill about 180mL volume
to the walls of the reactor vessel. What was tested
as ash is likely inert or random left-over inert slag in the reactor.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. 92% surface
enrichment. I
. This powder
probably has sintered itself to the inside of the inner alumina tube, where
there will be direct thermally conductive contact - almost like a thick
film paste on a substrate.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:21 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Bob
added.
I can imagine Rossi essentially thick film coating his active Ni powder
onto the inside of the central alumina tube as part of creating the
reactor. Perhaps this would also include an alpha alumina washcoat that
would render the alumina impermeable to hydrogen.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Oct 14
encapsulated with a
high alumina cement. Maybe the ends are terminated in inconel for
interconnection.
Bob Higgins
a...@well.com wrote:
I now think the general structure is more like this :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/hotcat_141014_1_010.png
See http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_oct2014_141014b.php in my other
thread for details
--
*From: *Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
I believe the ends, between the central tube and the outer 2 cm hot tube,
are filled in with a refractory cement. In fact, that whole space, and
maybe not the ends could be filled in to help improve the thermal
conductivity. Most importantly it should keep out the air that could
oxidize the
I believe that Ni particles will not work once melted - just intuition,
because I don't buy the neutron stripping yet. If we take a leap of faith
and say that the central reactor core alumina tube is coated with particles
sintered to its inside (like a catalytic converter for example), we don't
101 - 200 of 777 matches
Mail list logo
