dmarc-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Todd Lyons
• [dmarc-discuss] "Using DMARC" draft revision posted. Dave Crocker
• [dmarc-discuss] In memory of JD Matt Simerson
• [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Terry Zink
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf bcx+dmarc
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Terry Zink
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John R Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= J. Trent Adams
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= MH Michael Hammer (5304)
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Adam Dawes
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Olga Gavrylyako
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Does ruf allow mail snooping? Was: Google doesn't support ruf= Patrick Peterson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John R Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Davide Migliavacca
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
  • [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Roman Prokhorov
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Roman Prokhorov
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Roman Prokhorov
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation John Levine
  • [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Rodney Cameron
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Andy Wilson
  • [dmarc-discuss] Switch to GZIP compression Kelley, John
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Switch to GZIP compression Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Switch to GZIP compression Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Switch to GZIP compression John Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Stephen Nightingale
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Murray Kucherawy
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Specification Update J. Trent Adams
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Specification Update Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support Douglas Otis
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC plugin for mailfront and qmail John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC plugin for mailfront and qmail Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Mike Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header MH Michael Hammer (5304)
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Michiel van de Vis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Christine Borgia
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Elizabeth Zwicky
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Sweet
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Alan Maitland
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Tom Hendrikx
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Tom Hendrikx
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Benny Pedersen
• [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? pandalove
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? John Levine
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 28 Tim Starr
• [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Al Iverson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Benjamin BILLON
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Benjamin BILLON
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourcedmarketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourcedmarketing mail operations? Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourcedmarketing mail operations? Michael Adkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Benjamin BILLON
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Michael Adkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Mason Schmitt
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Alan Maitland
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Michael Adkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Steve Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez

• Earlier messages
• Later messages