dmarc-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Statistics [email protected]
• [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Netsons > Paolo Giustiniani
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Tim Draegen
  • [dmarc-discuss] R: About SPAM Policy Netsons > Paolo Giustiniani
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Tim Draegen
  • [dmarc-discuss] R: About SPAM Policy Netsons > Paolo Giustiniani
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] R: About SPAM Policy Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] R: About SPAM Policy Davide Migliavacca
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] R: About SPAM Policy Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Benny Pedersen
• [dmarc-discuss] Removing DMARC record Umesh Ratnayake
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Removing DMARC record Benjamin BILLON
• [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] to: googlers: clarify X-Original-Authentication-Results Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Raman Gupta
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bounce / auto-responder dmarc handling Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] specified optional options vs XML spec Tomki Camp
• [dmarc-discuss] Automatic reply arrigoni
  • [dmarc-discuss] Automatic reply arrigoni
• [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Nic Bernstein
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Jon Doyle (AzureCoast)
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM John Sweet
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Mason Schmitt
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Maarten Oelering
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Deployment problems with Postfix + pypolicyd-spf + OpenDKIM Nic Bernstein
• [dmarc-discuss] With DMARC, are phishing emails more difficult to detect? Franck Martin
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] Blank reports from Microsoft? Terry Zink
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Blank reports from Microsoft? Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Blank reports from Microsoft? Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Blank reports from Microsoft? Rolf E. Sonneveld
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Blank reports from Microsoft? Terry Zink
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] Interesting Gmail/Google Apps behaviour Leith Bade
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Interesting Gmail/Google Apps behaviour Andy Wilson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Interesting Gmail/Google Apps behaviour Leith Bade
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Interesting Gmail/Google Apps behaviour Roland Turner
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Tomki Camp
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC URI size allowance Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] [dmarc-ietf] DMARC URI size allowance Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dmarc-discuss] AUTO: Oliver Endrikat ist außer Haus (Rückkehr am 15.08.2013) Oliver Endrikat
• [dmarc-discuss] Bug with hotmail.com feedback reports Leith Bade
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bug with hotmail.com feedback reports Leith Bade
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Bug with hotmail.com feedback reports Leith Bade
• [dmarc-discuss] policy enforcement on ReturnPath seeds at hotmail? Jay Brangiforte
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] policy enforcement on ReturnPath seeds at hotmail? Carl Jantzen
• [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SMTP error codes in regards to DMARC John Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUA FIELD REMOVAL Umesh Ratnayake
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUA FIELD REMOVAL Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUA FIELD REMOVAL Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUA FIELD REMOVAL Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC RUA FIELD REMOVAL John Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] AUTO: Oliver Endrikat ist außer Haus (Rückkehr am 12.08.2013) Oliver Endrikat
• [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass - SPF Fail ??? DSH
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass - SPF Fail ??? Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DKIM Pass - SPF Fail ??? Steven M Jones
• [dmarc-discuss] Upcoming DMARC BoF at IETF 87 in Berlin J. Trent Adams
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Upcoming DMARC BoF at IETF 87 in Berlin Franck Martin
• [dmarc-discuss] SPF Check issue on Gmail Anshul Agrawal
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Check issue on Gmail Anshul Agrawal
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Check issue on Gmail J. Trent Adams
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Check issue on Gmail Anshul Agrawal
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC On AmazonSES Umesh Ratnayake
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC On AmazonSES Roland Turner
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 7 Lori Ruff
• [dmarc-discuss] who is wrong: google or opendmarc? Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] who is wrong: google or opendmarc? Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] who is wrong: google or opendmarc? Franck Martin
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3 Tim Starr
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3 Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3 Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3 Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 19, Issue 3 Douglas Otis
• [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Douglas Otis
  • [dmarc-discuss] Receiver [non-]obligations (Re: multiple from) Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Receiver [non-]obligations (Re: multiple from) Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] options on multiple from John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] options on multiple from Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] options on multiple from John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Douglas Otis
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Dave Crocker
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Andrew Sullivan
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from Scott Kitterman
• [dmarc-discuss] RUA : Field Reports Umesh Ratnayake
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] RUA : Field Reports MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [dmarc-discuss] dmarc and spamassassin Benny Pedersen
• [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail caching _dmarc record for too long? Raman Gupta
• Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Roman Prokhorov
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] reports loop problem Benny Pedersen
• [dmarc-discuss] Implementer Notes Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Implementer Notes Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Implementer Notes Andreas Schulze
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Implementer Notes Benny Pedersen
• [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Other Mailbox
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Tom Hendrikx
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Tim Draegen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail MH Michael Hammer (5304)
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail Tim Draegen
  • [dmarc-discuss] Network objects - was: Re: Microsoft - Hotmail Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Network objects - was: Re: Microsoft - Hotmail Murray Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Network objects - was: Re: Microsoft - Hotmail John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Network objects - was: Re: Microsoft - Hotmail Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Network objects - was: Re: Microsoft - Hotmail Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail David Romerstein
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Microsoft - Hotmail George Bilbrey
• [dmarc-discuss] face to face in vienna Andreas Schulze
• [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Franck Martin
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Michael Adkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Michael Adkins
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
• [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Andreas Schulze

• Earlier messages
• Later messages