lpi-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams Jeremy C. Reed
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] educational materials authors with access to LPI exams ross brunson
• [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute Announces First Approved Training Partner in the Netherlands Scott Lamberton
• [lpi-discuss] New LPI-ATM eweek story Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] New LPI-ATM eweek story Evan Leibovitch
• [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs Jeroen van Meeuwen
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Comparing Linux Certs A.L. Mathlener
• [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute Announces New Affiliate in Portugal Scott Lamberton
• [lpi-discuss] Message to all Jim Lacey
• Antw: [lpi-discuss] Effective immediately, I'm no long on the list ... Ulrich Weis
• [lpi-discuss] Effective immediately, I'm no long on the list ... Bryan J . Smith
• [lpi-discuss] RE: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- [L]GPL trademark Bryan J . Smith
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Anselm Lingnau
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Bryan J . Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Anselm Lingnau
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Sun, not Novell Bryan J. Smith
• [lpi-discuss] LPIC3 study guides / preparation urandom character special device
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] LPIC3 study guides / preparation -- experience Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] LPIC3 study guides / preparation -- experience Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] LPIC3 study guides / preparation -- experience ross brunson
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Short version ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Short version ... Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- WAS: LPIC3 Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: BS' final comments on 'spam filters' -- Now Canadians ... Bryan J. Smith
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3D?iso-8859-1?q?=5Fsemantics/posturing?=3D, _____the_2_?= types of LPIC... Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the =?iso-8859-1?q5Fsemantics/posturing?=3D, _____the_2_?= types of LPIC... Hans Forbrich
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3D3D?iso-8859-1?q?=3D5Fsemantics/postu?= ring3D3D,_=5F=5F=5Fthe=5F2=5Ftyp?=3D_es_of_LPIC...?= Bryan J . Smith
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3D?iso-8859-1?q?=5Fsemantics/posturing?=3D, ___the_2_typ?= es of LPIC... Bryan J . Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the semantics/posturing, the 2 types of LPIC ... Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the semantics/posturing, the 2 types of LPIC ... Frank Vincentelli
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? beyond the semantics/posturing, the 2 types of LPIC ... Hans Forbrich
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? Permanent Box
• [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy ?? Clarification Bryan J . Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J . Smith
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J . Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Danny Williams JR
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Karl Schock
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-2 self-study materials - WAS: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Alan McKinnon
• [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J . Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Danny Williams JR
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Evan Leibovitch
• [lpi-discuss] The three most common issues with NFS+Samba I've seen ... Bryan J. Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Bryan J. Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") CORRECTION Bryan J. Smith
• [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Novell supports Linux Professional Institute's LPIC-3 Certification Scott Lamberton
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Novell supports Linux Professional Institute's LPIC-3 Certification Jeroen van Meeuwen
  • [lpi-discuss] It's time to play "Common Linux Knowledge" ... -- WAS: Novell Bryan J. Smith
• [lpi-discuss] Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... Matt Benjamin
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... in the context of Samba for Exam 302 (plus AFS) Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... in the context of Samba for Exam 302 (plus AFS) Matt Benjamin
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... in the context of Samba for Exam 302 (plus AFS) Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... in the context of Samba for Exam 302 (plus AFS) Matt Benjamin
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... in the context of Samba for Exam 302 (plus AFS) Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Exam 302 and NFSv4 ... Evan Leibovitch
• Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- I am an idiot Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- I am an idiot Alan McKinnon
• [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- the "Superstore" profit model applied to Enterprises ... Bryan J. Smith
• Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Ryan McCain
• RE: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional InstitutechangesRecertification Policy Luiz Ramos
• RE: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changesRecertification Policy Luiz Ramos
  • [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changesRecertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changesRecertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changesRecertification Policy -- Alumns before '03 Sep ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changesRecertification Policy -- Alumns before '03 Sep ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Anselm Lingnau
  • LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Etienne Goyer
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Etienne Goyer
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Etienne Goyer
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: LPIC-3, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes... G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Slawomir Kawala
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Alan McKinnon
  • LPIC-3 core exam, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Etienne Goyer
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- testing enterprise Linux technology ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- testing enterprise Linux technology ... Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- testing enterprise Linux technology ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Ryan McCain
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- a "positive" note from BS ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- a "positive" note from BS ... Scott Lamberton
  • [lpi-discuss] My initial thoughts after looking at the exam list Ryan McCain
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- if you don't like what you see, VOLUNTEER! Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: LPIC-3 core exam, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Alan McKinnon
  • Re: LPIC-3 core exam, was: Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Sławomir Kawała
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 Samba, LDAP and other specialty exams -- WAS: Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 Samba, LDAP and other specialty exams -- WAS: Recertification Policy Slawomir Kawala
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Etienne Goyer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Steve Holdoway
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- WAS: Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- WAS: Recertification Policy Steve Holdoway
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Steve Holdoway
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Steve Holdoway
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- NFS _and_ SMB (not "versus") Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 core exam -- "Test on 1 concept" 'argumentative' answer: AFS Bryan J. Smith
  • unofficial LPIC-3 news [was Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ...] G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: unofficial LPIC-3 news [was Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ...] Slawomir Kawala
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: LPIC-3 Samba, LDAP and other specialty exams -- WAS: Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- Executive Decisions ... Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- Executive Decisions ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] RE: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- the "2 issues, " plus LPI's direction ... Ryan McCain
• [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy G. Matthew Rice
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Scott Lamberton
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Karl Schock
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Luiz Carlos Ramos
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- arguing over the semantics, not the effects Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Anselm Lingnau
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"? Bryan J. Smith
  • HR and education [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] G. Matthew Rice
  • Work experience as a recertification option [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: Work experience as a recertification option [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: Work experience as a recertification option [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: Work experience as a recertification option [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: Work experience as a recertification option [was Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- how does LPI "pay" for all your "wants"?] G. Matthew Rice
  • [lpi-discuss] Major tangent: why network/software engineering/technology is a real discipline -- WAS: Work experience as a recertification option Bryan J. Smith
  • [lpi-discuss] Update to list of free training materials Evan Leibovitch
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Alan McKinnon
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy G. Matthew Rice
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Karl Schock
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Karl Schock
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- beyond the semantics/posturing, the 2 types of LPIC ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- beyond the semantics/posturing, the 2 types of LPIC ... Andreas K. Foerster
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Karl Schock
  • [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- Everyone "sound off" on this ... Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] Re: Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy -- Everyone "sound off" on this ... Anselm Lingnau
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Luiz Carlos Ramos
  • Re: [lpi-discuss] [LPI-News] Linux Professional Institute changes Recertification Policy Danny Williams JR

• Earlier messages
• Later messages