Or on the consultant's page at PickWiki.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Moderator
Sent: 29 March 2004 21:15
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: A Parting Request
Darwin,
Sorry to hear you are in a dry spell.
You migh
Simple!
He's saying "Don't mix web and email". And I couldn't agree more. If I
get a forum post sent to me by email, I don't want the grief and hassle
of firing up a browser, and a web connection, and and and ...
Oh - and I've just recently upgraded my email client at home. The
assumption when th
Mark,
All I can add is that when I went to London and to Sydney, I wasn't
a stranger - I was "I know you from the U2 list, right?" and I had
friends in both countries. I'm doing business in South Africa, partially
because of this list. The funny thing is, for every person I've helped,
I'm su
I agree that this list will be sorely missed. It has a genuine technical
value as well as a human value for some of the soft topics that floated
around. Plus, it helped identify some quite knowledgable people that I hope
still contribute later.
I've gotten some UV/UD and even D3 and AP-Pro and oth
Perhaps I should ask the question a little differently.
Due to constraints within the customer's environment, we have been asked to
'narrow' and 'control' and 'audit' the access available via the various
interfaces to uniVerse, but not disallow them. If we do this at the server
end, then we have
Joe
You must have more time on your hands than I but I will try to reply to you
before this list terminates.
This list has helped me and I'm sure many others overcome our ignorance or
lack of experience etc. When genuine problems are encountered we usually go
through our support channels and they
*** end of thread ***
Joe Eugene wrote:
Clif,
Sorry... I kept this discussion to the best of my Professionalism,
until a few folks here Provoked with some serious name calling.
Its appears bad enough...
some folks here cannot discuss stuff in a constructive argument.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
-O
Clif,
Sorry... I kept this discussion to the best of my Professionalism,
until a few folks here Provoked with some serious name calling.
Its appears bad enough...
some folks here cannot discuss stuff in a constructive argument.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PRO
Guess again.
Craig Bennett wrote:
You're right Tony, but I assumed Cliff was giving us a holiday right now.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Real Funny ;)
I have Spare Time alright.. and you have MORE TIME TO
Reply to "Stupid Topics" than TO *HIT* DELETE KEY.
Does that give you a HINT?
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
>Sent: Monday, Ma
Dont you still get it...? Think a little bit HARDER!...
Joe Eugene
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:31 PM
>To: U2 Users Discussion List
>Subject: Re: Modern Universe - was: The lists are
This is a test, right? Y'all got together off-list and cooked this up to
see if I was going to follow through or just roll over and let things
free-wheel for the duration.
Seriously, this kind of name calling, mud slingly, and vitriol is
disturbing in its lack of professionalism. Add to tha
Trevor,
I am a member of serveral other Technical Forms. When i have found problems
with any software, have brought it up on several occasions. A few of these
issues
were acknowledged by the Software Vendor and later architectural changes
were made to rectify the issue.
On this Forum, i have rar
Hi Will,
troll( P ) Pronunciation Key (trl)
v. trolled, troll*ing, trolls
v. tr.
1.
1. To fish for by trailing a baited line from behind a slowly
moving boat.
2. To fish in by trailing a baited line: troll the lake for
bass.
3. To trail (a baited line) in fishi
Joe why are you on this list?
What is the point of hanging around haranging (sp?) us if you are not interested in
learning anything as you put it?
Why not just leave.
Will
In a message dated 3/29/2004 9:30:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Our UV Developers here have over
>within UniVerse without any operating system or external dependencies.
Whoops, that should have been UniVerse or UniData.
Craig
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Trevor,
We have a product which will let you do this (and much much more) all from
within UniVerse without any operating system or external dependencies.
You can convert your reports in BASIC or from TCL, create sequentially if
your input is large, squash wide format down to A4 add graphics, supp
Hi Trevor,
Did a quick google and came up with this one.
http://www.eprg.org/pdfcorner/text2pdf/
Os command line utility (win and *nix)
At first appearance it looks alright.
Cheers,
Cam Booth
Analyst Programmer
Ultradata - Vision to Reality
www.ultradata.com.au
-Original Message---
And now for something completely different!
Any help or suggestions regarding converting out text reports in the &HOLD& file to
PDF files for subsequent e-mailing.
Cheers
Trevor Ockenden
Open Systems Professionals
M: +61 414 731 634
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Fr
>Haha, I'm sorry, but is THIS the focused technical resource or the chatter
>group - I honestly can't tell though I've been here believing it's the
>technical group. I like the group and all but this group is not what I'd
>call focused. YMMV. We'll see what happens on the other side.
You're rig
Joe
One final point. You find it hard to believe people on this LIST get so
defensive.
May I suggest that if we were to dive into a DB2 or SQLServer LIST (if they
exist) and put them down I dare say we would get some pretty abusive remarks
thrown at us too.
Only to be expected
Trevor Ockenden
O
What is your DEAL... Am Not Interested in Learning PICK/BASIC Or
spending
my valuable hours on some legacy technique.
You can call it WHATEVER you want... Does it really Matter?
You seem to be VERY Interested in Trivial things and stupid comments!
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAI
Joe
Thanks for the direct reply.
I have had some experience with 'mainstream' databases and due mainly to my
lack of knowledge and experience I found them to be cumbersome, inefficient
and expensive for the type of applications I was dealing with.
Having said that, I have seen some fantastic app
Joe Eugene wrote:
>I have heard stories where several corporations migrated to RDBMS,
>Never heard any LARGE Corp(Hershey, GE, BOfA etc) switch to UV/MVDBMS.
Of the many companies who have migrated from MV to an RDBMS you always hear
the fanfare of their initial decision but rarely of the years of
Craig Bennett
>CDP is all very well, but the noice ratio can be quite high,
>not to mention the trolls.
Haha, I unsubscribed from this group for several months just because of the
high noise volume in here.
CDP volume tends to go up and down but since there are so few people really
contributing
Hi Joe
The area I push Uv is complex transaction processing. RDBMS are
designed for High Volume Simple transaction processing.
When the Business rules become complex and there is a high level of
crossreference, Uv outperforms. A Pick application runs in virtually
every bank in the world from the
You are correct. It was your "Trivial things and stupid comments" that I was
answering.
Regards,
T.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Trevor,
Sorry.. that was a TYPO.. I Re-Posted the Performance Results.
Everybody here thinks I am just bringing up things for FUN!.
These are Real world, Real Time applications. I have never worked
With any database where I had to Increase the Application Server Timeout
Cause Users were getting R
Our UV Developers here have over 25 years of Experience doing the stuff
the do... I personally am not interested in learning the details of UV
since nobody really uses this kinda stuff at Corporate Level.
I am simply surprised why UV is still used by a few Loyal Folk...
when people with 25 ye
David
Yes, there are many threads that have bored me silly but I just delete them.
I suspect if Joe perseveres here we may actually assist him by speeding up
his UV application.
Also, other "quiet" bystanders (like myself at times) pick up valuable
pieces of information from observing these thre
Dude... Why don't u find somewhere to TALK Rubbish!
IF you don't like the EMAILS... DON'T YOU KNOW HOW TO DELETE...?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:13 PM
> To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Joe
Have you sized your UV file correctly? The 15-20 seconds suggests many
things are not as they should be.
Can you do an "ANALYZE.FILE" on this file and post the details. If it is a
dynamic hashed file include the option "STATS" please.
We may be able to help you after all.
Cheers
Trevor Ock
Is it just me or this getting really BORING! (and that's be REALLY nice
about it)
LOL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:07 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The
Joe,
FYI, PICK is NOT a flavour of BASIC. Pick is a MVDB currently owned by
Raining Data. You do need to some more research - proper research of the
topic. You can refer to UV running with a PICK flavour but nothing else.
BASIC is the programming language used by most of the MVDB systems. PICK
BAS
Dude, your like the dog that just won't stop humping the guests leg. Get
over it already.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:31 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The
Joe
Have I missed something here. You refer to the QUAD as having MSSQL SERVER
2K as the database so where does the UV (or PICK) files fit into this
equation?
Also, when carrying out this performance test did you take into account as
to whether or not the file was in memory or not. The Athlon may
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> George, the best commercial integration option available
>> for MV right now is
>> the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
>
>But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
>And doesn't "integration" require an object?
>As in... integration with .. w
george r smith wrote:
>Get the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data and get the
>same support as Clink for mvBase - no thanks.
Well George, there are many more engineers and support people working on
PDP.NET than on mvBASE. mvBASE is a dead-end DBMS product that RD inherited
- Clink was dea
This is what I meant ... TYPO
RESULTS
Machine: 950 MHZ Athlon
Database: MSSQL SERVER 2K
Records: 20 Million
Indexes: NO
Search Column: First Name
Search Type: Wild Card (*)
Search Time: 2 Seconds
--
Machine: QUAD Processor Box (4 GHZ)
Database: UV Version 10.1
Records: 500,000
Joe,
Have you checked the file sizes? Have you checked the index
parameters? I'll make you a bet. You bring me in for a week (i'll
probably need most of that week to prove my results, the fixes will take
less than a day) and I bet you we can make a meaningful improvement in
your response tim
Joe,
The big corporate moves have more to do with marketing and sales
than they do technical issues. Most of them have horrible ROI. I've been
in companies of $500 Million and up which do not have any handle on
their IT costs for non-MV work. Most companies work on a "% of gross"
theory whic
Hi Joe,
Perhaps you could share your actual searches, code and database
structure? Were you searching 20 million records in a single column
table? Multiple "fields (or columns if you insist)" in the Universe
database? What is this PICK you keep talking about? Universe doesn't
have a component name
Charles,
Our Customer Information is stored in UV and accessed via PICK.
This FILE (as UV ppl call it) contains around 500,000 Records in it.
Everything is INDEXED Per UV Standards.
Here is simple WILD CARD Search Test.
RESULTS
Machine: 950 MHZ Athlon
Database: MSSQL SERVER 2K
Records: 20 Milli
David,
> All I ask is to keep an open mind as PICK plays an important role in
> some areas of technology that cannot be replaced
I am very open minded to all Technologies and I think every software
professional will benefit from being open to technologies.
I have been unable to convince myself t
That's my understanding.. If you think of a linux server hosting Tomcat
which in turn is hosting a complex Java application, which utilizes a big
ass Oracle database hosted on a Solaris server in some other corner of the
IT dept. Then the Oracle database is not embedded, and is accessed via
Michael,
1) You are right - you MIGHT need JavaScript skills if you want to do anything
"special". If you copy/paste modify the following
VRE.doAction("CallU2");
substituting your own "action" as appropriate, you have mastered all the jScript you
need ! Hopefully you would agree that t
CDP is all very well, but the noice ratio can be quite high, not to mention
the trolls.
If we don't move to U2UG (and I think U2UG will be fine once we can reply by
email and they clarify their intellectual property problem, and it would be
nice if their emails contained a bit less guff) we should
Joe,
Here's a few things to consider. MV environments (including
UniVerse), allow for small teams to develop and adjust business rules
more quickly than you can you can in Oracle, Sybase, or Informix.
Published statistics show that MV environments are roughly twice as
efficient in disk usage
Michael,
If you have VISAGE questions, Ross Ferris of STAMINA is a list
member (we still have a few days in which we can call ourselves list
members) and I'm sure he can answer your pricing and technology questions.
- Charles "We'll miss Clif" Barouch
Michael Spencer wrote:
Last I looked
Hi Joe
I have worked with variety of databases and I think using one
performance statistic to evaluate the capabilities of one database
against another is meaningless. As a professional I consider all
databases for any business requirement and select on their merits. To
discount MV products from
One could check www.okidata.com to see if there's any support for manual
printer driver stuff like bar codes. I use www.hp.com to get beaucoups of HP
PCL stuff.
my 1 cent.
- Original Message -
From: "Ray Buchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
Here is the file.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Thank you David,
I shall talk with the programmers.
Regards
Kafsat
-Original Message-
From: David Wolverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 1:19 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SB error
This would tell me that you have two programs running:
Sess
> Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program - which
> will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
>
> I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
You could try 'named pipes' to pass the information BUT this is a large
topic. You may need to do some investigation.
I
Yep...
Very true...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Stevenson, Charles
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: 3/29/2004 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: What are "embedded databases"
> An embedded database is a technology that is deployed as the
> component responsible for data management within a busi
And, what if the database is not embedded?
How does the data get moved between the application and the database?
ODBC/etc., etc., etc.?
Does "embedded" imply a level of application interactivity with the data in
the database that one would not have if the database being addressed by the
applicati
"What we have here is a failure to communicate."
- "Cool Hand Luke"
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"
- Clark Gable as "Rhett Butler in Gone with the Wind"
At 12:01 PM 3/29/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>"With all due respects, Sir, you are beginning to bore the hell out of me!"
>
>
> An embedded database is a technology that is deployed as the
> component responsible for data management within a business
> application.
>
> Dave
> > The other day, someone asked me if I used an "embedded database".
So most of this list's members probably don't *use* an embedded
database, b
Hmm ... I thought that what IBM mean by 'embedded database' is
"the database you didn't even know you had".
[8 words!]
I.E., there's a database 'embedded' in the software package you bought /
use, but you may have no idea that there is a database in there, and even if
you do understand that fact
Michael,
Visage does not require Javascript skills, but if you have those skills Visage allows
you to use them.
The published price for Visage Designer is $2,495 USD and comes with 3 Run-Time
versions. Additional Run-Time Visage versions are $265 each... but that amount is a
one-time-only cha
Well, not sure about 10 words or less, but here's my effort:
An embedded database is a technology that is deployed as the component
responsible for data management within a business application.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/29/2004 2:18 PM
> And doesn't "integration" require an object?
> As in... integration with .. what?
I wouldn't sweat it. The verb "integrate" becomes the noun
"Integration", and everyone knows that nouning always weirds verbs.
Verbing weirds nouns, too.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.olive
It would have been easier if you just asked me to reread the original post
;-)
I think I know what Tony meant with his statement, but, it isn't appropriate
for me to answer for him so I won't.
Thanks for the English lesson - I think.
Regards,
Jim
[snip]
"Integrate" in this sense requires a "w
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:15:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> I don't really know what you are after with the
> "integration" requiring an
> object. Can you be more specific?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim
Yes.
"Integrate" as a verb I think applies to mathematics.
But if I
Like Wol and a couple of others, my participation as a listener and
occasional poster will stop if the medium changes from email to web or
news-group. My employer does not permit desktop internet access - we do have
a large and rich intranet - for reasons of security, of cost (we pay for
TRAFFIC he
MvBase?
I think he was saying "best provider for MV" not for MvBase
Right?
And I didn't say it, he did.
Will "the real Will not the fake posing Will's" Johnson
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Will,
>
> Unless something has changed s
> But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
> And doesn't "integration" require an object?
I can't speak of the Pick Data Provider for .NET, however, the .NET
framework itself doesn't take up a 'gazillion' bytes. The framework (free
download) is between 21 & 24MB (depending on the
Darwin,
Sorry to hear you are in a dry spell.
You might also consider posting your information on the "Talent
Available" forum at www.u2ug.org, if you have not done so already.
--
Regards,
Clif
I realize things are tough right now everywhere, but
if you would be interested in speaking to me o
Will,
Unless something has changed since Friday, Raining Data's .NET provider does
not connect to mvBase.
There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary and I am not one
of them.
George Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EM
Tony,
Get the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data and get the same support
as Clink for mvBase - no thanks.
There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary and I am not one
of them.
George Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [ma
(adjusting tin foil headgear)
You do realize that Micro$oft is really in the hard drive business.
Of course .Net takes up a gazillion megabytes and to use my method of getting to
UniVerse with C# (so you can type in all those cool looking semi-colons) you'll have
to load another half gazillion
Just as everyone else is, I too am sorry to see the
list go away.
My parting request is for help personally. I am
currently unemployed or should I say an under-employed
consultant after having been downsized about two years
ago. I have over 20 year's experience with
unidata/pick and IT project m
In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:28:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> George, the best commercial integration option available
> for MV right now is
> the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't "inte
Dave,
Thanks for the Interesting Conversation/Argument.
I did learn something from the Folks here who were willing to share
information while I was researching UV. Thanks to ALL.
Wish the Next Forum and UV all the Best.
Thanks,
Joe Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you explain what you are referring to more clearly?
In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:09:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> Not to be obnoxious but why not keep data in one place? How would it benefit
> someone to start a question in one medium and then be referred
In order to use UniObjects for Java under .Net here's what you need to do.
1) Install vjredist.exe onto your machine, it's the redistributable package for J#
2) Look over this web page
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dv_vjsharp/html/vjgrfjavabinaryconverter.asp
You don't seem to be able to put any values on the phantom line
(and if you do, they seem to be ignored). I never tried Commons
for this.
Another method I use is I create a VOC entry
based on UserNO and something static like:
(ex. 101phantom)
<1>PA
<2>RUN LIB PROGRAMNAME PASSVAR1 PASSVAR2 PASSVA
George, the best commercial integration option available for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data. When IBM has UO.NET, that
situation may change, but developers must research and understand the
capabilities of both products before making assumptions and decisions - it
wou
I think Joe may realize a couple things:
1) He doesn't know enough about the system to criticize it.
2) The IT people in his UV shop didn't know much either.
Many Pick guys get into Pick because they know their business market but not
much about technology, and Pick makes it easy to write software
In a message dated 3/29/2004 1:11:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> > Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom
> program - which
> > will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
> >
> > I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Yes Carolina. The
Please Speak LOUDER!!!
*throws you a raw steak*
Will "raw steak" Johnson
In a message dated 3/29/2004 12:26:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Going MainStream and staying with BIG THREE is Better for the
> future of the Company's Needs. BIG THREE has A LOT OF
> INVESTMENT
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:55:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> embedded data base support
The other day, someone asked me if I used an "embedded database". And I was like ...
what?
Can someone give ten words or less of what an embedded database is? And then
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:27:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> e.g. We pull XML Reports from our Vendors Real Time. I have to parse
> through the XML and give UV/PICK Guys a FLAT TEXT File... cause either
> UV Cannot handle the storage and Retrival of XML Data Using
Not to be obnoxious but why not keep data in one place? How would it benefit someone
to start a question in one medium and then be referred to another? That sound
counter-intuitive to me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004
In a message dated 3/29/2004 11:07:24 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> 1. Populate UV and Oracle with around 10 Million records.
> 2. Write fairly complex Web Application against it.
> 3. Run a Web Application Stress tool(around 1000 Users)
> switching Databases within the
1) We DO want to leave the archives at indexinfocus.
2) We DONT want to replicate the archives onto u2ug
3) We DONT want the lists to continue
Go to the web site, and enter each forum you are interested in and click on SUBSCRIBE
this will make all responses come to your email box just as they do
Brian you get the big gold star today.
I should probably have stated more exactly what the field name was.
The only response, that is might have embedded spaces wasn't the case this time, but
that wasn't the fault of the responder since I wasn't specific about what the field
was.
It was called M
Or pass it in the phantom statement and parse in out in the program.
EXECUTE "PHANTOM %PARM1%PARM2%PARM3"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONVERT "%" TO @FM IN VAR
PARM1=VAR<2>
PARM2=VAR<3>
PARM3=VAR<4>
unless it is a record or dimensioned array
Vance
I doubt you'd find much disagreement on that point Joe...
Unfortunately, I think you are missing the real point...
Ultimately, what's "best" for a company need varies from company
to company, and from situation to situation.
For many people, being on 'top of technology' is not a benefit. In
fact,
Why not write the value to a commonly located record and then read it in the
phantom?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Allen Egerton
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:11 AM
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: Re: COMMON Variable.
>
Carolina,
Could you write the variable out to a file and read it in within your program?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Carolina Lizama
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: COMMON Variable.
Thanks Clif
>-Original Message-
>From: george r smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:21 PM
>To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
>Subject: Question for Donald Kibbey
>
>
>
>There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary
>and I am not one
>of them.
Your not 01, s
From: "Carolina Lizama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program - which
> will be called using EXECUTE 'PHANTOM '.
>
> I've even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Common exists on a per-user basis. So, if your phantom initializes it, it
Ray,
You don't say which model Oki you're using. Manuals are on-line at
http://my.okidata.com .
Did you first issue the "ESC DLE A" command to specify that Code39 is to be
used? For testing, try a string (HEX) like:
27 16 65 08 02 00 01 01 02 02 03 01
Kent
At 06:42 AM 3/29/2004, Ray Buchne
Thanks Cliff for maintaining the wonderful user group. I will definitelyy
miss it.
Guys,
Is there a way to pass some common variable to a Phantom program which
will be called using EXECUTE PHANTOM .
Ive even tried named COMMON and it lost its value.
Thanks.
Carol.
_
> Why not ask the alternate question of why the SQL Server can't handle
the > backend?
Simple Reason... "Management Politics".
> No one is saying UV is a truly 'enterprise' class DB.
WE AGREE 100% NOW! I was just trying to say the above.
Going MainStream and staying with BIG THREE is Better
Don,
Picked this up on your reply to the guy who thinks strong typing is a
virtue.
> So, what's your point? Use C# against the UV database if
> that's what you want to do (I and others have been doing this for a
> couple of years now).
I would like to use C# against unidata what do I need to d
Last I looked at Visage, it:
1) required javascript skills
2) had no published price
3) had no developer copy available
4) had not only a developers cost but a "per seat" cost
Apart from those 4 problems, however, the "movies" did make it look like
an impressive product.
-Original Message---
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"
- Clark Gable as "Rhett Butler in Gone with the Wind"
At 12:01 PM 3/29/2004 -0500, you wrote:
"With all due respects, Sir, you are beginning to bore the hell out of me!"
-- Clint Eastwood as "Gunnery Sgt. Thomas Highway in Heartbreak Ridge"
===
Brian,
Correct me if I am wrong...
IBM Says "UV is an Extended relational database"
Well Some people call it MVDBMS. I wonder how this is different
from Nested Table Data Structure within any RDBMS.
Can you explain?
> Complex processing managed locally to
> the
> database, without having to add
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
