To me it would be that which is contained when you specify a number of
dimensions. 2d? The universe can be a piece of paper.
But that implies that dimensionality is a fundamental property of
reality. It is conceivable that dimensionality is not fundamental, but
rather emergent.
--
You
Bruno,
There are a lot of amazing theorems in that field. For example the
theorem of Blum and Blum, which says that there is something
infinitely (even non computably) more clever (in learning) than any
machine: a couple of (independent) machines!
Learning machines exist, and the theory
Thanks Bruno!
A great 2010 to you and everyone on the list.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 31 Dec 2009, at 11:58, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Bruno,
There are a lot of amazing theorems in that field. For example the
theorem of Blum and Blum, which says
tendencies
to any number of fine consumer products like booze, tobacco, cars, video
games, and the internet.
rand
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
Hi Bruno,
Nobody knows logic. Marijuana illegality, and the whole prohibition
politics are based on error
Hi Bruno,
Thank you for the detailed response. I was aware of most arguments up until
the self-referential machine part and, of course, agree with them. That part
I'm still digesting, although I believe I understand most of your argument
there.
I'm having a hard time understanding this
Hi Bruno,
Ok, nothing to add. I fully agree with what you say.
Best,
Telmo.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi Telmo,
I'm having a hard time understanding this particular statement:
The lobian error is that prohibition at the start deprive its
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
I think of comp as a monitor of what the brain does
physically, objectively, materialistically, such as, at first
glance, produce electrical signals, things a computer
implant could do and in fact do
Dear Bruno,
FYI:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/**releases/2008/06/080602160845.**htmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080602160845.htm
15 people is not a serious sample, and then, to make it illegal you have
to compare with the long-term effect of other activities (alcohol,
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
solution to the mind/brain problem in favor of treating
both substances as material.
A common criticism of dualism is the problem of interaction. If mind is
outside the
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain
Hi Richard,
A common criticism of dualism is the problem of interaction. If mind is
outside the physical world, how does it interact with body? Any
mechanism of
interaction you can propose would make mind part of the physical
world,
thus
negating dualism.
I appreciate and
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Processes still have to have overall coordination to prevent
collisions, keep oil and water separate.
No they don't. The separation of oil and water is just the macroscopic
outcome of local
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Processes still have to have overall coordination to prevent
collisions, keep oil and water separate.
No they don't. The separation of oil and water is just the macroscopic
outcome of local
My
memory is the identity of my 1p and is what my 1p sees.
This is perhaps the most serioous problem of comp.
Frankly I can understand people not convinced that a computer can
have a quale associated to the memory, but memory and personal memory does
not pose any problem in
Hi Roger,
Anything goal-oriented is teleological, which is what
the word means. And the goal of life is to survive.
So evolution is teleological.
Sorry but I don't agree that life or evolution have a goal. That would be a
bit like saying that the goal of gravity is to attract chunks of matter
that the goal of life is to survive is ok... so
long as we acknowledge that goals are always in the mind of the
interpreter.
Terren
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
Hi Roger,
Anything goal-oriented is teleological, which is what
the word means
Hi Alberto,
so awareness and intention are before biology, so you seem to admit a
teleology before life, like me. I don`t find this incompatible with natural
selection
But it is. The big achievement of Darwinism (and the more complete version,
moden synthesis) was to explain the origin of
sufficiently complex to feel a sense of
purpose.
Have a great Sunday,
Telmo.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
12/15/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Telmo Menezes te
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:16 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/16/2012 1:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 15:00, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
OK, after thinking it over, it seems there's two ways of thinking
about L's metaphysics.
1) (My way) The
Hi Richard,
I believe in the one god of CTM and its (X Z) logically derived
string theory that is omnipotent (contains and carries out the laws of
physics),
When people claim that an entity is omnipotent, they are generally implying
intentionality on the part of the entity.
omniscient
Hi Roger,
Lakoff is correct about conservatism and the father.
It is not a pathology, however, to respect your parents,
Agreed.
and respect is a mixture of love and fear.
For me respect is a mixture of love and admiration, which are things that
have to be earned. I loved and admired my
of the subject
imagining a likely future state.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
I think that is a misleading article. If it's fMRI, you
don't see the riginal video clip as an eye would see it,
you see an image of brain activity.
[Roger
Hi Roger,
Here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=nsjDnYxJ0bo
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
It would be good if they showed a video clip.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
12
Hi Roger,
It is indeed hard to believe. Glad you enjoyed it!
Best,
Telmo.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Thank you so much ! What an achievement !
Hard to believe.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
12
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Re: I am my memory, which is provided by my 1p.
Hi Telmo Menezes
Thank you so much ! What an achievement !
Hard to believe.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
12/18/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 12/20/2012 6:17 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Roger,
I accidentally sent the previous email before
I was done, sorry. Please consider this more complete version
of the intended whole:
Hi Telmo
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
Hi Roger,
I accidentally sent the previous email before
I was done, sorry. Please consider this more complete version
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
You're right, I got the scanning part all wrong.
You can find sites that may tell more by Googling on
Reconstruction from brain activity
Apparently they use complex brain modelling
Hi Bruno,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The infinite set of natural numbers is not stored on anything,
Which causes no problem because there is not a infinite number of anything
in the observable universe, probably not even points in space.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 24 Dec 2012, at 17:24, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Consciousness does not emerge from anything.
It is simply the act of perception.
Roger, when I say consciousness what I mean is not the act
In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes we
all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best interest
of society instead of our own self-interest. I believe they have two main
sources:
1) Biological evolution. In the long term, the DNA of the
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:27 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/2/2013 4:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes
we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best
interest of society instead of our own
Hi Roger,
That's a bit surprising!
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Then we pretty much agree.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
1/2/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Jan 2013, at 13:08, Telmo Menezes wrote:
In my opinion, good and evil are just names we attach to brain processes
we all have in common. These brain processes make us pursue the best
interest of society instead
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a
communist and so anti-christian). His diatribe against Christianity
is a prime example. It's totally misinformed and mistaken.
Ethics is, at
Hi Roger,
I'm curious about the experimental setup. Could it be that he's just
misinterpreting a probabilistic distribution? Suppose the amount of time it
takes people to solve a puzzle follows a normal distribution. As time
passes and we ride the slope to the mean, we can get the mistaken
of skepticism and wonder.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Sheldrake's been criticized in such a fashion for many of his results
(there are a huge number of other types of observations) but I simply
trust that he's not deceiving us. My
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 1/3/2013 10:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Although a brilliant logician, Russell was far left (no doubt a
communist and so
Hi Roger,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe
What is space ? There is no such thing as space, there are only fields,
which are mathematical structures.
Fine.
What is matter ? There is no such
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
All I can find on the web is that DNA only contains instructions to make
various biomolecules such as proteins, RNA, etc.
That's enough. Proteins fold into complex 3D structures with very
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:06 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/4/2013 1:24 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:49 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/4/2013 7:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Don't take this too much literally.
I have never believed
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:57 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/5/2013 9:46 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:06 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/4/2013 1:24 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:49 PM, meekerdb meeke
Hi Roger,
Hi Telmo Menezes
Thanks. But can such biomolecular structures
develop into a living cell ?
Current mainstream Biology believes that's the case. There isn't a complete
model yet, but many pieces of the puzzle are already known. The current
developmental theory is based on self
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Sorry, everybody, I was snookered into believing that they had really
accomplished the impossible.
So you think this paper is fiction and the video is fabricated? Do people
here know something I don't
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Well then, we have at least one vote supporting the results.
Scientific results are not supported or refuted by votes.
I remain sceptical because of the line sync issue.
The brain
rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Yes, but the display they show wouldn't work if there were no
sync signal embedded in it. There's nothing in the brain to provide that,
so they must have.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] rclo...@verizon.net]
1/7/2013
Forever is a long
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Monday, January 7, 2013 6:19:33 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Roger Clough rcl...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Sorry, everybody, I was snookered into
Hi Craig,
Cool. I actually would have agreed with you and a lot of people here at
different times in my life. It's only been lately in the last five years or
so that I have put together this other way of understanding everything. It
gets lost in the debating, because I feel like I have to
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
According to Plato, all love, all truth, and all beauty comes from the One
(ie God). That being the case, when I experience love, truth or beauty, I
sense God's
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:26, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come from?
I am not quite sure, but it comes probably from the consistency of
inconsistency (that is: Gödel's second incompleteness
Hi Craig,
I tend to agree with what you say (or what I understand of it). Despite my
belief that it is possible to extract memories (or their 3p shadows) from a
brain, I do not believe in the neuroscience hypothesis that consciousness
emerges from brain activity. I'm not sure I believe that there
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 17:03, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 13:26, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Where does hate, falsehood and ugliness come
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:15 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 1:58 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
I tend to agree with what you say (or what I understand of it). Despite
my belief that it is possible to extract memories (or their 3p shadows)
from a brain, I do
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:01 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 2:28 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:15 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 1:58 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
I tend to agree with what you say (or what I
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:58 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:15 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:01 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 2:28 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:15 PM, meekerdb meeke
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:33 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/10/2013 4:23 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Do you think there can be something that is intelligent but not complex
(and use whatever definitions of intelligent and complex you want).
A thermostat is much less complex
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 23:05, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jan 2013, at 17:03, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Bruno Marchal
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 4:58:32 PM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
I tend to agree with what you say (or what I understand of it). Despite
my belief that it is possible to extract memories (or their 3p
Hi Roger,
How can you have a wave without some notion of spatial/temporal dimensions?
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi everything-list,
I don't believe that Descartes would accept the MWI.
Here's why:
I think that the ManyWorldsInterpretation
are equally
real, including dreams. Including the literal dreams we have when we sleep.
So I believe in the physical world without being a materialist.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
I don't pretend to be a physicist, but I do know
:)
Ok.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
The Schrodinger wave equation (SWE) uses a quantum wave function
psi(r,t), which is the
mathematical probability that a quantum particle will be at certain
location r at time t.
Solution
Hi Roger,
I think there's a lot to worry about, because it's not enough to have an
alternative. This alternative has to be online and have a sufficiently high
energy output before we get to too far away from peak oil. A sufficiently
strong decrease in energy production could create a catastrophic
Hi Roger,
Me too - well maybe not as often as I should. I hope it's helping you!
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Burns' therapy is called cognitive therapy. I use it all of the time.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14
Instead of complaining now or watching what the market does, by not really
watching it á la Roger, better include the future when considering past and
present: I bet that Spain, with its sunshine monopoly and mix of renewable
energy and infrastructure investment of the last years, will be
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 15 Jan 2013, at 00:38, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/14/2013 10:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Lobbying should be forbidden.
But it's just another name for petitioning your government. Lobbyists
provide a lot research and
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/15/2013 8:18 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 15 Jan 2013, at 00:38, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/14/2013 10:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Lobbying
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Alberto G. Corona
These days, anything that smacks of authority is trashed.
Possibly because of information spreading on the Internet. (Most) authority
thrives on the ignorance of its victims. It's becoming common
Hi Edgar,
Block time and Bruno's comp can only tell us how a set fixed static sequence
of events could be perceived by some observer as a fixed static sequence of
events. It simply CANNOT tell us how time moves ALONG that sequence.
The fact that time flows, that things change, is a
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
Hi Telmo,
No, because I don't have to remember that my clock moved. I can actually
OBSERVE it in the process of moving. That's one of many reasons block times
including Bruno's don't make sense.
Could you observe the
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, January 31, 2014 8:28:38 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, January 31, 2014 8:08:32 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi Liz,
Great avatar :)
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone asked how a block universe comes to exist and if it comes into
existence all at once, or a bit at a time (or something like that).
I wish I could find the original question, to make sure exactly
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Friday, January 31, 2014 3:54:54 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
Like, wow. Nice picture (I'm tempted to say it makes a lot more sense
than some posts around here!)
Hehe, thanks! I got accepted to do a poster
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:01 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:14 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
One I've mentioned ad nauseum - Memento.
A very good movie.
There is also The Prestige, which I would definitely recommend.
One of the best movies of
If no human can check a proof of a theorem, does it really count as
mathematics? That's the intriguing question raised by the latest
computer-assisted proof. It is as large as the entire content of Wikipedia,
making it unlikely that will ever be checked by a human being.
mind, as if it has some magical property that gives
hypothesis or proofs more credence.
Cheers,
Telmo.
Regards,
Quentin
2014-02-19 19:13 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
If no human can check a proof of a theorem, does it really count as
mathematics? That's the intriguing
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 19:13, Telmo Menezes wrote:
If no human can check a proof of a theorem, does it really count as
mathematics? That's the intriguing question raised by the latest
computer-assisted proof. It is as large
Great news! I've got mine already on my trusty ebook reader. Let's displace
Paul McCartney
http://www.amazon.com/Amoebas-Secret-Paul-Mccartney/dp/B001OD6HRW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1393954155sr=8-1keywords=the+secret+of+the+amoeba
:)
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Chris de Morsella
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:10 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
If no human can check a proof of a theorem, does it really count as
mathematics?
Good question, sometimes I wonder if we're getting close
Hi Craig,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
If the doctor became more ambitious, and decided to replace a species with
a simulation, we have a ready example of what it might be like. Cars have
replaced the functionality of horses in human society.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Bruno, I am shocked and saddened to hear what has been done to you.
You have my greatest sympathies. (I too have been susceptible to
manipulation, as I am rather shy and awkward in person, so I speak from
experience.)
Liz,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
Brent,
If information is not being lost then the amount of information in the
universe is increasing at a tremendous rate as new events occur, and has
been since the beginning. So where is all that new information being
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
Telmo,
No, compression is totally unable to explain the storage of total
information in a universe which continually doubles its amount of
information from one Planck time to the next and continually adds that
amount to
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
In the present state and the physical transition rules from one state to
another ? if the transition is reversible then from only the current state
you can infer the past state, without it being encoded in the present
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
Telmo,
No, that was Brent's claim. I'm asking him to tell us how it works. Where
is all that additional information about past states stored if he thinks
none of it is lost?
Edgar,
One thing is to claim that no
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
The thing I most want to know about RCP4.5 is what RCP stands for,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-21 17:59 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2014 22:07, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Germany is scaling down its nuclear energy production and plans to shut
down all of it's nucler power plants in the next two decades. This is due
to political
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/21/2014 9:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-03-21 17:19 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:59 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2014 8:08 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:10 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/21/2014 9:59 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco
Beautiful and thanks indeed!
There's something disturbing about how organic these images look. With
evolution and even statistical physics we understand how nature keeps using
variations of the same trick, but then to also find these things deep in
the abstractions of math... One can't help but
I think we have a strong contender for an ig nobel award here!
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.8146
Enjoy. I sure did. I think...
Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL
Email: kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
let your schooling get in the way of your education - Mark Twain*
On 2 Apr 2014, at 1:25 am, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
I think we have a strong contender for an ig nobel award here!
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.auwrote:
http://arxiv.org
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014 20:33, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Stathis Papaioannou
stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4 April
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-04 19:05 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 11:44, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 April 2014
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 23:03, LizR wrote:
On 3 April 2014 05:56, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't narrow it down too much.
Je m'accuse. I was one of them.
My point was that conspiracy theories, in the sense of power elites
secretly cooperating to further their own interests against the interests
of the majority
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:00 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion, so to speak - the details were a bit weird, as in
most dreams, but that was the gist of it - I sent him away, saying no
thanks we
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't narrow it down too much.
Je m'accuse. I
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 April 2014 23:30, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't narrow it down too much.
Je m'accuse. I was one of them.
My point
1 - 100 of 1632 matches
Mail list logo
