Re: [Gimp-developer] Bug? Clone Tool after Merge Layers

2008-02-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 21:39 -0500, Brendan wrote: Have two layers, one has a Layer Mask that I have painted in to unmask the edges of a models face from a Gaussian Blur tool. Layer Mask gets squashed down with a Merge Visible Layers command. After that, I can't seem to get the Clone

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch for fli.c

2008-02-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote: The patch is for this specific file: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gimp/trunk/plug-ins/gfli/fli.c It fixes two problems: * loading of fli files that specified width=height=0 (that means 320x200) * writing of differential color chunks

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch for fli.c

2008-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote: Hello, I don't know if I should send patches to this list, but anyway, I think that it's a good place. We would prefer if you opened one or even several bug reports at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ with a description of the problems you

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch for fli.c

2008-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote: On the other hand, I think that the GFLI plug-in has other problems (in the gfli.c file). IMO we should remove this plug-in from the main distribution. It doesn't seem to be very useful for the main target audience and it appears to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch for fli.c

2008-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote: The patch is for this specific file: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gimp/trunk/plug-ins/gfli/fli.c It fixes two problems: * loading of fli files that specified width=height=0 (that means 320x200) Where is this specified? * writing of

Re: [Gimp-developer] Broken blending

2008-02-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:00 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote: I just installed gimp 2.4.4 for Windows from binary distribution. Now, setting blending opacity = 50 results in full opacity, otherwise - no opacity. You aren't perhaps working with an image in Indexed mode, are you? Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] fonts in gimp

2008-02-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 18:56 -0500, Andrei Simion wrote: This is what we use and it worked fine with Gimp 1.2. version, but I've been told the font description has changed for 2.x versions. What you used is certainly not the format that GIMP 1.2 expected. The format for GIMP 1.2 was XLFD

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP on gtk-macosx, anyone?

2008-02-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 12:18 -0500, M Gagnon wrote: * There's a few major showstopper bugs, and we're waiting on GTK folks to fix them. The most important one is that keyboard shortcuts currently do not care about the open window and can catch keys randomly - for instance if you try to

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP on gtk-macosx, anyone?

2008-02-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 15:17 -0800, Ettore Pasquini wrote: I'm not sure I understand fully your packaging mechanism, but would it be possible to have script-fu and the launcher as faceless background apps? You would also have to do this (or something like this) for all plug-ins. Script-Fu

[Gimp-developer] GIMP on gtk-macosx, anyone?

2008-02-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, has anyone lately tried to build and use GIMP on Mac OS X using GTK+ with the native Quartz backend? http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gtk-macosx/ As far as I can see there have been lots of fixes there lately, all of which seem to have been merged to the GTK+ 2.12 tree. So it would

Re: [Gimp-developer] fonts in gimp

2008-02-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:26 -0500, Andrei Simion wrote: I have some Perl scripts that connect to a Gimp server and generate images. I want to upgrade to the 2.2 version of Gimp and I know that I have to change the font names. That's it, I pass a font to the script in order to generate

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP focus on windows

2008-02-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 23:21 -0800, Michal Tomaszewski wrote: I recently started using it on Mac. I've noticed an annoying thing, that eachone running gimp window looses focus if any other window is currently being used (so if I use the window with tools, the image window will loose

Re: [Gimp-developer] no image open spec...

2008-02-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: in the window. Useful content means GTK+ widgets. And we can't (yet) make GTK+ widgets translucent. Are you 100% sure? http://www.breakitdownblog.com/gnome-murrine-theme-gets-transparent-widgets/ Yes, I am. What your

Re: [Gimp-developer] no image open spec...

2008-02-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 01:35 +0100, peter sikking wrote: 4) a plugin system for this window; we ship a standard, good one like above. If somebody really insists he or she wants to see a file open dialog every time or the 10 last edited pictures (both not very good ideas to force upon one

Re: [Gimp-developer] no image open spec...

2008-02-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 01:35 +0100, peter sikking wrote: and oh, note that the slider to set the alpha of what goes on in that window will be there anyway... This is not currently implementable, so I would rather not base the spec on this opacity slider. I also very much wonder why the

Re: [Gimp-developer] no image open spec...

2008-02-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:48 +0100, peter sikking wrote: just to clarify: are you assuming that the whole window will become transparent and the desktop shines through? No. That would be implementable as there's GTK+ API to do that (though not supported on all platforms). I am talking

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: GIMP Levels operation fix

2008-02-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote: Basically it fixes over/underflow in the Levels op; Your approach is not the right way to fix this. There is absolutely nothing wrong with under- and overflows if we are using GEGL. The problem you are seeing is that some of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] toward a plan for 2.8

2008-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Well, why dont start to work with the visions? I see it's as a great idea. That's what we are doing for one and a half year now. Your mail pointing out where the vision is not yet implemented was really completely unneeded. We are well aware that it's still a vision and that a lot needs

Re: [Gimp-developer] toward a plan for 2.8

2008-01-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:29 +, Michael Grosberg wrote: One more question regarding the list (I know it's not a roadmap but still): Will a move to pure SDI help to get all the various dialogs to float properly above the image windows, never be lost behind them, and not have their own

Re: [Gimp-developer] toward a plan for 2.8

2008-01-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:29 +, Michael Grosberg wrote: So, what is the product vision? http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.4.4

2008-01-30 Thread Sven Neumann
, sv, uk) Contributors: Sven Neumann, Michael Natterer, Kevin Cozens, Hans Breuer, Bill Skaggs, Ulf-D. Ehlert, Martin Nordholts ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Gimp-developer] improving the Print plug-in

2008-01-30 Thread Sven Neumann
OK then, I have opened bug 513291 for this. Sven BTW, Bill, could you perhaps check if there's a way to configure your mail client to include an In-Reply-To field in the message headers? It would be so much nicer if your replies would appear in the thread you are answering to. Thank you...

Re: [Gimp-developer] Size entry widgets could use some simple math (from Bug: 76616)

2008-01-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 16:50 +, William Skaggs wrote: I don't have anything to say about how this should work, but I'd like to make some suggestions about the approach to development. Mostly it should be possible to do this in a modular way -- evaluating expressions doesn't really

[Gimp-developer] improving the Print plug-in

2008-01-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, we have a serious problem with the Print plug-in on the Windows platform. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480086 As it seems this is unlikely to ever get fixed in GTK+, so we should consider to do something about it in our code, at least for GIMP 2.6. The way that GTK+ Print is

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP Animation Package 2.4.0

2008-01-29 Thread Sven Neumann
GAP, the GIMP Animation Package, is a collection of plug-ins to extend GIMP with capabilities to edit and create animations as sequences of single frames. Version 2.4.0 of the GIMP Animation Package is now available. This is a bug-fix release that makes GAP usable with GIMP 2.4.x releases. The

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adding SpaceNavigator support

2008-01-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 01:16 -0800, Ettore Pasquini wrote: That's ok. I was thinking to actually move the image around, not the pointer. Our aim is to ease navigation not access to features. So basically we want to avoid (e.g.) the time you spend by moving the mouse over to the scroll

Re: [Gimp-developer] task list

2008-01-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:45 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote: You might want to look at the nip2 graphics editor, which works this way. I find nip2 hard to use despite (or maybe because of?) the graphical interface, though. Thanks for the pointer. But we already decided that we don't want to

Re: [Gimp-developer] task list

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:06 +, William Skaggs wrote: * Construct an optional MDI version of the gui. That is definitely not a goal. We are not willing nor able to maintain optional user interfaces. The UI has to evolve and it will be highly customizable, but we are not going to offer

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 04:38 +, William Skaggs wrote: 8. improve the text tool Evaluation: Most of the points mentioned here would be relatively simple to implement. One of them -- the ability to have multiple text items within a single layer -- might not be simple, and it should

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:20 +0100, peter sikking wrote: Even before 2.4 came out, I was warned that not to much UI work could be done for 2.6. GEGL first. OK. suits me, that leaves a period where the UI analysis can get (finally!) done and a transition can be made towards tackling the

Re: [Gimp-developer] tasks list

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 11:48 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Well, there _had been_ a beta version of the list (to which several people including myself contributed) and since then nothing has happened, so I was wondering if you still liked that idea ;-) I did not like any of the beta

Re: [Gimp-developer] tasks list

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:03 +, William Skaggs wrote: I think it would be a lot more useful if we would just collect a list of tasks that we consider important, without sticking them into a particular release time-frame. That will make it easier for new developers to participate.

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:21 +, William Skaggs wrote: The idea I was responding to was, as I understood it, basically to have multiple PangoLayouts within the same layer. Even that would probably not be so difficult to implement, but I think it would probably cause more harm than

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 06:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: It would also be nice to get the Polygonal Select Tool details sorted out for 2.6. There is code for such a tool in bug #119646 [1], the question is just to what extent it should be merged/integrated with the Free Select Tool.

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 11:18 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Sven, I hate to raise quasi-offtopic themes, but is the plan to publish a roadmap still in force? ;-) I don't think we want to publish something and call it a roadmap. But we had the plan to make a list of important tasks that

Re: [Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:20 +0100, peter sikking wrote: When making the roadmap the rational decision can be taken what GIMP needs now: polygonal tool or fixing the floating selection. One gets the nod, the other has to wait for a next release to get worked on (UI spec, dev, test, doc,

[Gimp-developer] input from the UI team needed

2008-01-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Peter, there are a couple of things that are waiting for input from the UI team. Things that we would like to sort out for GIMP 2.6. It would be nice if we could get some advice from you and your team. I made a list of the things that in my opinion are most important right now. The order is

Re: [Gimp-developer] MIDI input controllers on Windows.

2008-01-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 03:47 +, barney holmes wrote: Thanks. So where should I be looking in the code base ? I've never got involved in Gimp development before. I'd like to give it a shot when I have time. Maybe it will be clearer what is needed for MIDI slider/knob input when I look

Re: [Gimp-developer] tagged resources such as brushes, gradients, etc

2008-01-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 12:03 +0100, Tobias Jakobs wrote: On Jan 18, 2008 8:55 AM, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My current favorite approach is to put the tags into files in the ~/.gimp-2.x directory, one file per resource type. So there would be a brushrc, gradientrc

Re: [Gimp-developer] tagged resources such as brushes, gradients, etc

2008-01-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 20:11 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote: What data structure could be used to represent this data in application? As I understand, it will be necessary not only to traverse data, but also to update it at runtime (not files, but internal data structures, of course).

[Gimp-developer] tagged resources such as brushes, gradients, etc

2008-01-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 20:52 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote: I don't see any disaster. Here is one possible solution: store some sort of checksum (let's say, MD5) together with filename in the database. MD5 checksums are a nice idea. I think I will incorporate that for the implementation of

Re: [Gimp-developer] GAP Export?

2008-01-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 16:22 -0500, Andy Berdan wrote: I've been investigating some animation systems for use at work here, and I was wondering about exporting names and locations of layers in the animation. I am not sure if Wolfgang Hofer, the author of GAP follows this mailing-list. You

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for managing resources such as brushes, gradients, etc

2008-01-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 17:03 +, William Skaggs wrote: This problem has been discussed several times in the past, and proposals have been made about how to address it. I have been thinking about it recently, and have come up with a somewhat different, and I believe simpler approach,

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for managing resources such as brushes, gradients, etc

2008-01-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 20:42 +, William Skaggs wrote: This mixes together two separate issues. No, it doesn't. Absolutely not. Tags are, as I have already agreed, an excellent way of doing a search mechanism. They don't get rid of the need to have a workspace, though. Suppose I

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for managing resources such as brushes , gradients, etc

2008-01-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 01:50 +, William Skaggs wrote: These are interesting ideas, but they are fantasies at this point. The whole tags thing is a fantasy at this point. There is no infrastructure in Gimp to support it, so everything would have to be written from scratch. That's

[Gimp-developer] gimp-gap 2.4 ahead

2008-01-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, for your information: We have created a gap-2-4 branch and intend to do a 2.4.0 release of the GIMP Animation package in about a week. This branch was created from the 2.2 branch, so it provides basically the same functionality as the GAP 2.2.2 release. It will however depend on GIMP 2.4 and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Haze on GIMP 2.4 image - Should this be a bug report?

2008-01-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 15:15 +, Michael Grosberg wrote: GIMP aims to be a respectable high-end graphic editor and as such should support color management by default. The problem you encountered is the same problem many first-time users of Photoshop encounter. Actually, Photoshop users

Re: [Gimp-developer] Slow complex selection area

2008-01-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 09:06 -0500, Daniel Gaudreault wrote: A few of our developers have noticed a rather concerning behavior with complex selection areas. When you start out with a simple selection area (say a square) and start adding to it, the whole app seems to start slowing

Re: [Gimp-developer] cleaning up GIMP versions in Bugzilla

2007-12-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 14:59 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote: So I suggest that we keep the 2.4-rcX releases until the middle of next year, or at least 2.4-rc3. Removing it too early would just result in having more bugs assigned to the wrong version and we would not even see that we should

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp menu - procedure positions

2007-12-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 20:19 +0100, Lionel Tarazon Alcocer wrote: At http://prhlt.iti.es/ we are developing a GIMP plug-in which installs various procedures under Image/giDoc/. By default the registered procedures appear in alphabetical order under this menu. Is there a way of

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp menu - procedure positions

2007-12-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 22:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would seem easy enough to add an extra arguement to indicate the required position in the menu list. A value of minus one could indicate a default placement, be that alphabetical or add-to-the-end. I don't see how that

[Gimp-developer] cleaning up GIMP versions in Bugzilla

2007-12-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, currently the following versions exist for product GIMP in Bugzilla: 1.x 2.0.x 2.1.x 2.2.0 2.2.1 2.2.10 2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15 2.2.16 2.2.17 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.3.0-devel 2.3.1-devel 2.3.10-devel 2.3.11-devel 2.3.12-devel 2.3.13-devel 2.3.14-devel

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.4.3

2007-12-17 Thread Sven Neumann
(ca, cs, de, gl, it, ko, lt, sv, uk) Contributors: Jesper de Jong, Bill Skaggs, Michael Natterer, Sven Neumann, Martin Nordholts, Kevin Cozens, Tor Lillqvist. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https

Re: [Gimp-developer] Some changes to the Edge plug-in

2007-12-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:21 +, William Skaggs wrote: As I tried to explain, Wrap is not useful with edge detection. It is very useful with blurring, because it makes opposite edges look similar. With edge detection, all it does is to cause an edge to be drawn at the border of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Some changes to the Edge plug-in

2007-12-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:51 +, William Skaggs wrote: You have a point here. But you also need to look at the costs of renaming a menu item. The documentation needs to change and users need to learn the new name. With the amount of plug-ins that we have it is rather difficult to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Some changes to the Edge plug-in

2007-12-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 00:23 +, William Skaggs wrote: No! The way I did it was broken. But the whole process is broken. It is impossible to fix the interface if every tiny change can be vetoed by any random person. The question is, how to find a process that actually allows change

Re: [Gimp-developer] finalizing the task list

2007-12-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Bill, On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 18:18 +, William Skaggs wrote: I think I probably would be able to come pretty close to turning the list that Chris Mohler created into a more-or-less complete 2.6 roadmap I don't think that a roadmap for 2.6 is what we are aiming for, at least not for

[Gimp-developer] GIMP at the 24C3

2007-12-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, as announced earlier, some GIMP developers are going to meet at the 24th Chaos Communication Congress (24C3) http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/ We already discussed that travel costs for such events should be reimbursed from GIMP donation money. For this event, I would like to transfer EUR

Re: [Gimp-developer] Some changes to the Edge plug-in

2007-12-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 00:12 +, William Skaggs wrote: 1) Changed the menu entry from Edge to Sharp Edges. Having an entry called Edge in the Edge-detect category is silly, and the thing that distinguishes this plugin is that it detects edges between neighboring pixels, that is,

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp permanent data AND parasiterc

2007-12-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:18 +0100, Lionel Tarazon Alcocer wrote: (1) ¿Is there any way to store data (similarly to gimp_set_data, for example) so that gimp loads it automatically at start? I don't mean using parasites stored in an XCF file. You can set a persistent global parasite using

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for usability enhancements for Stroke dialog

2007-12-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 03:32 +, William Skaggs wrote: Okay, I can see that a preview would go a long way toward making the dialog more usable. I looked over the relevant code, though, and I'm not sure it would be very easy to set one up. Previewing libart stroking wouldn't be very

Re: [Gimp-developer] thumbnail generation for nautilus via gimp

2007-12-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 23:24 +0100, Eckhard M. Jäger wrote: pdb.gimp_file_save_thumbnail(this_filepath,this_filepath) pdb.gimp_image_delete(this_filepath) Both functions take an image object as the first parameter and not a filename. Shouldn't you ask these kind of

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for usability enhancements for Stroke dialog

2007-12-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 17:51 +, William Skaggs wrote: 1) The most important is that the dialog should not go away after the Stroke button is pushed. It often takes several tries to get the settings right, and it is very annoying to have to bring the dialog back each time. The gain in

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for usability enhancements for Stroke dialog

2007-12-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:10 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: Certainly a full-size preview would be quite useful. Like you, I find that I usually Stroke several times trying to find the right brush size (I usually stroke with the paintbrush tool, for its antialiasing). It wouldn't have to

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for usability enhancements for Stroke dialog

2007-12-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 19:39 +, William Skaggs wrote: How could it be made easier? Well, for plug-ins this is already quite easy. You use Undo and then Reshow the filter dialog. It's rather confusing though that this only works for operation implemented as plug-ins. It would perhaps be

Re: [Gimp-developer] changing the shape of a text layer

2007-12-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:13 +, William Skaggs wrote: Yes, that's what I meant. From a user's point of view, that's a pretty major restructuring. But that code is all in SVN already. Just pass --disable-toolbox-menu to configure. Note that you need to do a full rebuild and a fresh

Re: [Gimp-developer] changing the shape of a text layer

2007-12-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 14:10 +0100, peter sikking wrote: So right now for this issue only the second part of point 3 (the lash-up) has been done. I am not sure this issue will pass point 1, at this moment. IMO it is definitely worth our limited resources. This has been on the roadmap for

Re: [Gimp-developer] changing the shape of a text layer

2007-12-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 19:42 +0100, peter sikking wrote: I think that is a consensus thing. Also everything is connected with the phased introduction of GEGL, which we have seen recently makes working on some urgent issues a waste of time, because a lot of code will be scrapped. Uh, oh,

Re: [Gimp-developer] changing the shape of a text layer

2007-12-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 23:28 +, William Skaggs wrote: In particular, I would be happy to work on the menu restructuring if you and Sven can agree to go ahead and make specific changes, and if Sven is comfortable with that. I have no idea what menu restructuring you are talking about

Re: [Gimp-developer] thumbnail generation for nautilus via gimp

2007-12-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 10:59 +1030, David Gowers wrote: In fact, all Gimp plugins are executables; when you call a plugin, GIMP runs it and communicates with it through a pipe. GIMP does not implement any special behaviour for .py files. That is why Python plugins must be executable. In

Re: [Gimp-developer] Have a gimp-developer intro page?

2007-12-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, thanks for the suggestions. That is exactly why I suggested that we put a task list online. We have been discussing this list over the last weeks and hopefully we can finish and publish it soon. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] thumbnail generation for nautilus via gimp

2007-12-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 12:56 +0100, Eckhard M. Jäger wrote: thanx for that. I tried something like gimp -i -n -f -d -s -b '(gimp-file-save-thumbnail /path/to/image.psd)' -b '(gimp-quit 0)' but i didn't get it work :( Have a look at the documentation again (hint: I gave you a link).

Re: [Gimp-developer] improving QMask mode

2007-12-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 18:05 +1030, David Gowers wrote: b) Push the context before entering qmask mode, and pop it when exiting qmask mode. For Chris's benefit : it means that the context that was being used is stored, and restored after qmask. so the FG and BG that you were

Re: [Gimp-developer] Requesting advice for solving bug #325564

2007-11-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:08 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote: If this change is implemented in GEGL, does that mean it will make it into 2.6? Probably not as it seems rather unlikely that we will start to use GEGL for the layer modes in 2.6 already. If not, wouldn't it make more sense to

Re: [Gimp-developer] OpenGates to Donate

2007-11-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 00:09 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote: This is the betatest form, so you can skip most of the questions asked there; just make sure the contact information section is correctly filled, and let me know (here or directly by email) that you have filled the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Automatic white balance

2007-11-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:13 +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: So it would be nice to be able to open a white reference picture and pick reference from this picture an apply it to the other shots. You can easily do that. Just do the color correction using the Levels tool on one

Re: [Gimp-developer] Automatic white balance

2007-11-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 22:04 +0100, Stephane Chauveau wrote: Nice! I never noticed that the grey point picker in the level tool could be used to adjust the WB. It is unfortunately limited to the mid-tones. How is it limited to the mid-tones? Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Requesting advice for solving bug #325564

2007-11-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 20:15 +0100, Jesper de Jong wrote: I have been looking into bug #325564 the past few days and I know how this should be solved, and I'm looking for advice on how best to implement this in GIMP. The best thing you can do at this point is to look at GEGL and make sure

Re: [Gimp-developer] finalizing the task list

2007-11-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:52 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote: On Nov 22, 2007 1:03 AM, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a nice start, but I think we need a lot more information in the short description. So one row per task is certainly not going to be sufficient. But it's

Re: [Gimp-developer] how to get pot files for gimp 2.4 110n?

2007-11-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 17:54 +0900, Choi, Ji-Hui wrote: I'm intending to update korean po files. but I couldn't find some strings. I think my po files need to update using pot files. You should run intltool-update ko in the po directory to update the files. Or you simply download them

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 roadmap: my summary.

2007-11-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 08:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find it rather arrogant to presume that those who can code are the only ones who can contribute to development and as a consequence anyone who can code is also an authority on graphic design and UI implementation. I have

Re: [Gimp-developer] finalizing the task list

2007-11-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 10:55 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote: OK. Should these tasks be added perhaps? http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/ToDo They should be considered, and as far as I can see, this has happened. But they don't belong on the task list unless we decide that they should go there. This

Re: [Gimp-developer] using the GIMP donations

2007-11-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 18:12 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: But I still can't see why it would be a bad thing to allow donors to donate money to specific features and what legal problems that would then arise. What would be the advantage if we allowed it? I can only see disadvantages if

Re: [Gimp-developer] finalizing the task list

2007-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 18:32 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote: On Nov 20, 2007 7:26 PM, Chris Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this sound reasonable? Is there anything I missed? Any volunteers to work on this list? Formatted it a bit better:

Re: [Gimp-developer] using the GIMP donations

2007-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 07:58 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote: For quite some time I have thought about setting up a system that would allow donors to donate money to a specific feature, e.g. donate money to implement a Polygonal Selection Tool. The money in this Polygonal Selection Tool

[Gimp-developer] finalizing the task list

2007-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, since I don't seem to be getting to do it myself, I want to propose the details of the task list / roadmap that I would like to see published on www.gimp.org. Perhaps with your help it can be done... We discussed the roadmap here over the last few weeks and during that discussion a lot of

[Gimp-developer] GIMP at the 24C3

2007-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
The 24th Chaos Communication Congress (24C3) is the annual four-day conference organized by the Chaos Computer Club (CCC). It takes place at the bcc Berliner Congress Center in Berlin, Germany. The Congress offers lectures and workshops on a multitude of topics and attracts a diverse audience of

[Gimp-developer] using the GIMP donations

2007-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, the GIMP project has a steady flow of donations coming in. Not much, but the amount has increased since the 2.4 release was made and since the gimp.org website features the Make a Donation button more prominently. Until now we have spent this money mainly on the annual GIMP developers

Re: [Gimp-developer] using the GIMP donations

2007-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 00:13 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: Until now we have spent this money mainly on the annual GIMP developers conference which has taken place at the Library Graphics Meeting in the That should have read Libre

Re: [Gimp-developer] Compiler Error in SVN

2007-11-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 09:17 +0100, Tobias Jakobs wrote: I have this compiler error in the SVN version: Something appears to be broken about your SVN checkout then. Did you check with 'svn status' that everything is uptodate and that there are no conflicts? Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem returning ARRAYs in plugins

2007-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 10:34 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that if a newbie developing plugins uses this value(an array type) he will miss that he has to add the size before of it. I have miss a few a days of development due to this problem. I would like that you add this

Re: [Gimp-developer] Resizing GIF animation: BUG/Feature request

2007-11-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 22:19 -0300, Charly wrote: Hello,I do not know whether this is a BUG or perhaps should be a feature request. Usually the GIMP does a good job resizing images, but not with this GIF animation: http://pixloads.com/public/pview/45183/halloween31.gif When I scale it

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem (solved?) in gimp-plugin-template

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 23:23 +, Carlo Baldassi wrote: In fact, the call to gimp_domain_register() was already present in the gimp-plugin-template: gimp_plugin_domain_register (PROCEDURE_NAME, LOCALEDIR); It returns success, but the menu entry is not translated. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Feature request for a spot healing brush

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 01:41 -0700, Joe Eagar wrote: Though I suppose suggesting it on IRC might be more appropriate then on the list. Is that what you meant? No, I only meant that filing enhancement requests for this is a waste of time unless more information can be provided. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Enhancement - Diagonal line crop guide

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:03 -0500, Tim Jedlicka wrote: I stumbled upon this link describing the use of the Diagonal (45 degree diagonal from each corner of an image) as the optimum crop guide (better than rule-of-thirds or golden rule). http://www.diagonaalmethode.nl/ I didn't find

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 roadmap items

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 08:29 -0500, Henk Boom wrote: - vector layers (Henk Boom?) I would be glad to continue work on this if there are possibilities of it getting into the main branch in the near future. The only issue is that I would only be available to develop this starting either

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP depends on libcurl, but this is not documented

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 20:49 +0100, Jesper de Jong wrote: Is libcurl indeed required to compile GIMP? No, you don't need libcurl to compile GIMP. There is one plug-in, which is completely optional, and it uses either gnome-vfs, libcurl or wget. For a Linux system it is recommended to use

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem (solved?) in gimp-plugin-template

2007-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 21:49 +, Carlo Baldassi wrote: Ooops, sorry, I didn't notice there was an SVN version of the template. It's the link on the sidebar of developer.gimp.org which points to the buggy version. We will release a fixed version of the plug-in template at some point in

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: 2. Guides based on any path This would make precisely aligned touch-ups easy, especially with tablet pressure effects when painting, when Stroke path just doesn't cut it. Double clicking could enter and exit a path editing mode.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: 1. Angled Linear Guides Double click on a line defines a center of rotation. Double-clicking doesn't work for this. Apart from the fact that we don't use double-click at all in the GIMP user interface, it is also extremely difficult to

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >