Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when -e is us

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached. I do not understand the problem. Of course pa

Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection problem

Stéphane, try in this way: * delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr * create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr * insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr In this way it should work. Tonino Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto: That could very well be, Tom. Stépha

Re: [vchkpw] New server

chkuser does not check for local users when domain is defined into locals. In such a case it simply accept any recipient for local domains. Reason is simple. For checking local domains users it should have root privileges, which is not wanted for a lot of reasons. I suggest to abandon any loca

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [SPAM] Qmail TAP not working

Il 01/03/2012 17:32, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I don't know for sure, but I can hazard a guess. You see, tap works on both sender and recipient addresses. More like sender *or* recipient addresses. Since the email is send from pqr, that tap is matched and no others are tried (apparently). Someo

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP authentication not work

You sould find in maillog the reason of failure. Regards, Tonino Il 05/05/2011 10:05, OVH ha scritto: Hi, Since few days I try smtp-auth and chkuser on qmail 1.03. I managed to apply the patch manually, when tested sending smtp-auth it never authenticate using vpopmail. In my config I have

Re: [vchkpw] qmail aliases fail; chkuser 2.0.9 + vpopmail 5.4.25

aliases are .qmail-aliasname files. "matt-foo" is not an alias. It is an extension of name "matt". For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS For enabling ezmlm lists, you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS. See http://www.interazioni

[vchkpw] Error in punycode (xn-- domains) handling by chkuser

Actually chkuser handles xn-- domains, but in the wrong way (it does not consider more levels of xn-- names, like xn-subdomain.xn--domain.com). To eliminate any problem, with current version, installations should be modified in this way: Or disable/comment in chkuser_settings.h #define C

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

tire message to the sender. http://mail.tnpi.net/toaster/?0::11467 I debugged the whole thing only to have Tonix wake up in Italy and say 'yeah, upgrade to the latest version' :) Yes, at that time return code were not exact, and after a lot of studying and suggestions, chkuser was u

Re: [vchkpw] submission port 587

Il 12/09/2010 01:39, jeffk...@intersessions.com ha scritto: This may be the wrong forum for this but I can't seem to find any info. Does anyone have information on how to setup a second SMTP process within qmail that listens on port 587 and accepts ONLY authenticated smtp connections? In thi

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 16:16, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 15:46, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: You could setup a version of qmail-smtpd

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Did you make ANY change in software recently? No. The server only rebooted but some times ago ... What does say your virtualdomains

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Hello, I'm managing an email server that recently started to refuse inbound mail to a few domains. I checked almost everything and the declaration seems to be exactly the same for others domains. For example : : 195.200.217.34 does not like r

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser to exit immediately

Hi Nick, actually, chkuser can do just that, for a well tought (I hope) reason: when an intruder tries your addresses, it is important to deny informations to him; if we drop connection, he will restart and next two attempts (thinking to your limit=2) will have a true answer... In this way, a

Re: [vchkpw] vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away

Joe Littleton ha scritto: I have searched for two days trying to figure out why I keep getting this error. I am using vpopmail 5.4.30 and mysql 5.0.77-4 on CentOS 5.4 I can reproduce the error by restarting the mysql server. The only way to make it work after restarting mysql is to also r

Re: [vchkpw] Re: disable-many-domains -> enable-many-domains

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Thibault Richard wrote: Hello, I'm using vpopmail since a few years with the compilation option "--disable-many-domains" (for historical reason because I followed Qmailrocks guide for my first installation). If I've well understand, one one the difference between th

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: I agree with this as well, for the most part. This is why I think that the option(s) would be better suited as CHKUSER_DISALLOW. IOW, start with things wide open, and let admins specify which characters they choose not to allow. I did not consider it this way. It is

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonino, I've wondered for a while about this but haven't had a chance to test it, so I'm going to ask the expert. ;) If /* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '' */ is commented out of t

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonino, I've wondered for a while about this but haven't had a chance to test it, so I'm going to ask the expert. ;) If /* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '' */ is commented out of the build, can it be added as an environment variable such as CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDE

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser log mesage, remote

27;t shown when there's a remotehostname value present? Looks like a bug to me. Many thanks, Tonix! Hi Eric, it is not chkuser, it's a qmail behaviour. If the helo is not different from (remote) hostname, qmail-smtpd sets it to NULL. void dohelo(arg) char *arg; { if (!stral

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser and mailbox quotas

DAve ha scritto: Good morning, We have, for a long time now, successfully used MailScanner on our gateway servers and then routing clean mail to our pop toasters. The pop toasters are running netqmail, vpopmail 5-4-17, and chkuser 2.0.8. I am having an issue where users are going overquota

Re: [vchkpw] Patch to disable vusaged

Simone Lazzaris ha scritto: In data giovedì 03 settembre 2009 hai scritto: Simone Lazzaris wrote: Our setup is spreaded on many servers (think 20), with the mail stored on an NFS share (NetApp). The vusage daemon is written with this in mind, though it's more efficient to have i

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser random rejects

-07-20 15:16 sqwebmail-timestamp drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 2008-11-01 09:17 tmp Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Which are ownership and privileges of domain directories and mailboxes? chkuser simply checks mysql or cdb, while qmail in delivery checks also for directories. Tonino Tren

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser random rejects

e: I seem to have broken things really bad. I tried to make mail.domain.tld an alias of domain.tld Now authentication only works from time to time. The bounce says: <mailto:u...@domain.tld>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Of course, that account exists. Where are domai

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser random rejects

Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: This most probably is not a vpopmail problem, but a chkuser one. The support page of chkuser (http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/support/mailing_lists.html) points to this mailing list, so

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser random rejects

Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: This most probably is not a vpopmail problem, but a chkuser one. The support page of chkuser (http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/support/mailing_lists.html) points to this mailing list, so that's why I'm posting this here. chkuser is simply using basic

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

Brian Lanier ha scritto: - Original Message - *From:* James Cox *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems I just did a fresh install of toa

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

James Cox ha scritto: On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Roberto ha scritto: Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output. In the past other people

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

Roberto ha scritto: Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Roberto James Cox ha scritto: I've had it running for a few hours, and have this: 1 CHKUSER rejected relaying 5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt 28 CHKUSER r

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail now has vusage daemon support

Matt Brookings ha scritto: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Quota code would be great, but I feel it would be better to move index of messages and quota on mysql (or other db) instead of continuing with old methods. A new library could be used for

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail now has vusage daemon support

Matt, now that qmail is in public domain, I feel it would have more sense to widen these projects and write some new qmail options, which can be used by upper layers like vpopmail (and dovecot, and so on). Quota code would be great, but I feel it would be better to move index of messages an

Re: [vchkpw] courier & this community

Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh ha scritto: Dear all, Courier has removed vpopmail module from authentication module list. According to courier's action, i think vpopmail has security problem.Correct this? Yours, Mohsen Courier author had always something against vpopmail. We should all switch to d

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0b - somes false positives

ISP Lists ha scritto: A system that's been running with 9000 users is now experiencing intermittent false positives when checking for invalid recipients. It's allowing invalid recipients "sometimes". I cannot find a pattern. Any guess on areas that might be culprits? Does chkuser have a defau

Re: [vchkpw] Can I ask about chkuser 2.0 patch here?

B. Cook ha scritto: I am trying to build a new qmail server to replace our older one here.. We have the chkusr 2.0 (either 2.0.6 or 2.0.5) patch installed on our current qmail working fine. The .qmail-defaults are not being recognized the correct way. it never sees that all mail should be ac

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER_ERROR_DELAY

Kis Peter ha scritto: Hi! I noticed, that "chkuser_settings.h" contains a setting called "wait for each not existing recipient." CHKUSER_ERROR_DELAY (Delay, expressed in milliseconds, to wait for each not existing recipient) default value= 1000 Why is it needed? Together with other

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser 2.0.9 installation fails after qmail-smtpd-auth patch

to `b64decode' qmail-smtpd.c:(.text+0x1396): undefined reference to `b64decode' qmail-smtpd.o:qmail-smtpd.c:(.text+0x13f8): more undefined references to `b64decode' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [qmail-smtpd] Error 1 Kis Peter e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser 2.0.9 installation fails after qmail-smtpd-auth patch

, which are important for other patches. You have only to add what chkuser asks for, keeping what previous patches inserted. In this case, you deleted the lines which contain "b64decode" routine. Ciao, Tonino "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser 2.0.9 installation fails after qmail-smtpd-auth patch

First apply other patches, then apply chkuser manually. See http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/manual.html for more info. Ciao, Tonino Kis Peter ha scritto: Hello! I would like to ask for some help! I have succesfully installed chkuser 2.0.9 on a clean

Re: [vchkpw] Set external and internal users

permission can only send to local domains. Tonino Kenny Lee ha scritto: > Hi Tonino, > > not really understand ... please you tell me where to set the auth > smtp or disable the default allowed relay ? > > thank you > > regards, > Kenny > > > - Original M

Re: [vchkpw] Set external and internal users

You must be sure your smtp server does not allow internals to relay. Probably you must disable default allowed relay for internals and set up auth smtp. Regards, Tonino Kenny Lee ha scritto: > Hi > > after i set vmoduser -r [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... i tried to use that email > address to send out th

Re: [vchkpw] vmysql: can't read settings from

Is the command executed inside Apache? So the user executing the command is the apache user, and not vpopmail. Ciao, Tonino Mitja Pirih ha scritto: Hi, Yes, the file exists. The permissions are also OK. # ls -l /home/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql -rw-r- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 45 Aug 7 14:0

Re: [vchkpw] migrating to new server

Lampa ha scritto: Hello, i need move from old server to new one. Problem is while DNS are replicated i need disable whole access to domain (delivering - smtp, pop3, imap). I know that via vpopmail is possbile disable access to imap/pop3. but is possible to disable smtp. In best case i need that

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail:vchkpw

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Hello I wanted to ask about creation of vpopmail:vchkpw user:group for vpopmail installation.Does every installation of vpopmail requires creation of this user:group pair.What if i want to use root:root for it? Regards, Hina Hayat. vpopmail must be able to read i

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER Bug (present in 2.0.9)

Joshua Megerman ha scritto: I just found a chkuser bug, which I will try to fix if the author doesn't beat me to it :) Bounce messages (i.e., from <>) are accepted for non-existant remote recipients. In our case, we have a rogue client who we used to perform secondary MX services for and sto

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Authenticaton

Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: I guess you use vpopmail. Sorry for the stupid deduction, I confused this mailing list with the general qmail mailing list :-). Tonino If you use chkuser patch (on for qmail/vpopmail), or Shupp's toaster which includes chkuser, you can force a serv

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Authenticaton

I guess you use vpopmail. If you use chkuser patch (on for qmail/vpopmail), or Shupp's toaster which includes chkuser, you can force a server to accept only authenticated sessions. So, you can set up a dedicated port (like the submission port) or a dedicated IP only for this purpose. See htt

Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

Did you enable checking of quota in chkuser_settings.h, and recompile? Tonino Pierre GEOFFROY ha scritto: Thank you for your reply. Yes, vpopmail shows the correct size and quota: eg: usage: 97% and while testing I receive MAILER-DAEMON stating the user is over quota. PG -Message d'ori

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quey wrote: Rick Romero wrote: I went looking into this thinking chkuser would be a perfect place for the basic quota check. Of course that would be sort of vpopmail specific, but lo and behold, it's already in

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail rejection of overquota messages instead of bouncing

Rick Romero ha scritto: Actually, as I was falling asleep last night (isn't that always the case), I wondered why chkuser.c sets maxmbxquota_limit = 0 and not 100 by default. It would seem to me if you're enabling the define, you would already expect that function to just work, n

Re: [vchkpw] authdaemond Memory Leak?

:* tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2007 1:03 AM *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] authdaemond Memory Leak? There was a memory problem in an old version of vpopmail library. It was related to usage of vlimits in MySQL. Check within mailing list

Re: [vchkpw] authdaemond Memory Leak?

There was a memory problem in an old version of vpopmail library. It was related to usage of vlimits in MySQL. Check within mailing list for such information. You have to ugrade/fix, then recompile vpomail and courier-authdaemon. Ciao, Tonino Matthew Goodman ha scritto: Hello, I've notice

Re: [vchkpw] can't make chkuser 2.09 work

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Christopher Chan wrote: what user privileges are you running qmail-smtpd with? May it cannot read vpopmail owned files? Did you do your testing as root and not under the same user id set in the run file for qmail-smtpd? I think this is the right line of inquiry,

Re: [vchkpw] can't make chkuser 2.09 work

What does chkuser log say about passing messages? Tonino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I patched a fresh netqmail distribution with chkuser 2.09. My chkuser_settings.h file can be seen here: http://sitefoundry.com/misc/chkuser_settings.h I had previously installed vpopmail 5.4.15, and it has

Re: [vchkpw] Two qmails in same machine

Rick Romero ha scritto: On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 17:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:52:57 -0600 Rick Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not entirely, If the main issue is timeouts during SMTP, he can move his scanning to '127.0.0.1', and remove it from his exte

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser and qmail ext

Tom Collins ha scritto: What am I doing wrong with my chkuser setup? I want to have an alias of .qmail-fred, yet allow email to be accepted for .qmail-fred-something. I'm using chkuser 2.0.8. Do I need to create .qmail-fred-default and define CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS_DEFAULT? I have CHKUSER_E

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail mysql and aborted clients

you use qmail-pop there in the way I told >>yesterday... after some time of inactivity happens this... >> >>sorry for insisting >> >> >> >> At 04.55 05/10/2007, you wrote: >> >>>tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: >> >>>>MysSQL

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail mysql and aborted clients

p there in the way I told yesterday... after some time of inactivity happens this... sorry for insisting >> At 04.55 05/10/2007, you wrote: >>>tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: >>>>MysSQL has now an hardcoded timeout of eight hours. >>>>Courier uses it's au

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail mysql and aborted clients

At 04.55 05/10/2007, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: MysSQL has now an hardcoded timeout of eight hours. Courier uses it's authentication daemon with persistent attach to vpopmail/MySQL, it could be that during the night there are no requests, so MySQL connections are dropppe

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail mysql and aborted clients

MysSQL has now an hardcoded timeout of eight hours. Courier uses it's authentication daemon with persistent attach to vpopmail/MySQL, it could be that during the night there are no requests, so MySQL connections are droppped (by MySQL). Ciao, Tonino At 09.36 04/10/2007, you wrote: Hi,

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser (2.0.9): "accepted any recipient for this domain" why ?

Sorry, I did not read carefully your message. It looks like qmail-smtpd is not able to read .qmail-default (infact when you run it directly, probably as root, it works fine). How do you run qmail-smtpd? Are you using the vpopmail user? Tonino At 11.35 02/10/2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser (2.0.9): "accepted any recipient for this domain" why ?

Hi Michel, you have to check if bouncing is enabled for each domain ("DOMAIN" setting in CHKUSER_START variable). Check in each domain's .qmail-default or use qmailadmin and set bouncing on for the domain. See http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/faq/enabling.html#D1

Re: [vchkpw] Shared libvpopmail thoughts

At 19.48 25/09/2007, you wrote: On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, John Simpson wrote: the idea of splitting the domains and mailboxes into different directories has been around forever, there's no excuse for somebody to not have made the adjustment by now. I'm all for keeping it, but someone shoul

Re: [vchkpw] [chkuser] - CHKUSER_SENDER_MX

At 13.48 24/04/2007, you wrote: At 13.14 24/04/2007, Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote: Hi, I hope I have the corrent mail list. I have CHKUSER_SENDER_MX enabled (uncommented) in my chkuser_settings.h. I would like to know if its possible to set this option on/off in the qmail-smtpd run script. Fo

Re: [vchkpw] [chkuser] - CHKUSER_SENDER_MX

At 13.14 24/04/2007, Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote: Hi, I hope I have the corrent mail list. I have CHKUSER_SENDER_MX enabled (uncommented) in my chkuser_settings.h. I would like to know if its possible to set this option on/off in the qmail-smtpd run script. For example is it possible to set

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

At 17.34 18/04/2007, you wrote: On Apr 18, 2007, at 2:31 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I suggest also to introduce a new notation for rejecting users/ aliases with a custom message (i.e.: reject "user has changed address. Write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"). This would be a lot more u

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

At 10.26 18/04/2007, Stephane Bouvard (ML) wrote: Hi, ,- - [ Le mercredi 18 avril 2007 vers 9:33 tonix (Antonio Nati) écrivait: ] - - | > I don't see any reason to check for the content > of alias, looking for a "bouncing" string. Apart > .qmail-default, I don'

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser wrongly accept emails for default@

This is not a chkuser problem, as chkuser simply uses qmail philosophy, checking for aliases in the qmail way. Anyway, I'm planning to add an option excluding any acceptance for "default" user (I'm thinking this since two years, but I've forgot to do until now) . This has nothing to do with

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

sione upgrade non vedo il .patch file .. Fammi sapere visto che sulla documentazione dice di usare patch <../patch-net/*.patch Ciao tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see <http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/>http://www.

[vchkpw] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). Short table of changes (more detailed changes in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/changelog.html) * corrected some bugs on MySQL checking (problem was only with so

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

At 15.52 15/01/2007, you wrote: Hello All especially tonix ;) , well, I see discussion running here ;) but I want move little forward. just my2 cent: qmail is good example of "proof of concept" which make its own way. Bad luck is that DJB is not working on it, so this nifty featur

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

Miki, At 15.52 15/01/2007, you wrote: Hello All especially tonix ;) , well, I see discussion running here ;) but I want move little forward. just my2 cent: qmail is good example of "proof of concept" which make its own way. Bad luck is that DJB is not working on it, so this nift

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote: People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Be

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

rt programmers. Just my 1 eurocent. Tonino -M ----- Original Message From: tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:31:40 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz" I'm

[vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on "dmz"

I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are external and use me as proxy SMTP). But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein programming is accademic and heavy to use, license is criminal. Progra

Re: [vchkpw] ezmlm and chkuser - vpopmail 5.4.10

chkuser 2.0.9 will solve this problem, as last version of ezmlm has no more a file chkuser used for checking the list existence. Enabling alias is another way to solve this problem. Tonino At 19.50 19/12/2006, you wrote: SOLVED: Per this thread (google cache): http://72.14.203.104/search?q

Re: [vchkpw] [chkuser] Enable '&' char in CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_

This is a known error. Because of a cut'n'paste error the check_rcpt_address_format() routine uses wrong constants. Inside check_rcpt_address_format() change all CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_x to CHKUSER_ALLOW_RCPT_CHAR_x Ciao, Tonino At 12.43 05/12/2006, you wrote: Hello ever

Re: [vchkpw] domain quotas

At 03.15 29/10/2006, you wrote: On Oct 28, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: I remember reading on the list some time ago that domain quotas didn't work. Has this been fixed? If so, are there any doc's on how this works? Specifically when the domain quotas is reached who is notified? I don't

[vchkpw] OT: tcpserver and rblsmtpd clones

Sorry for the off topic. Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and rblsmtpd? I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and deployment of new integrated features could be more easy. Thanks, Tonino

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER and smtpd-auth 0.57

At 22.54 03/10/2006, you wrote: Hi, I have installed Netqmail-1.05 / Vpopmail 5.4.17 and qmail-smtpd-auth-0.57(www.fehcom.de) Is it possible to install chkuser 2.0 with this configuration? Do I need to make some changes? Use Shupp's Toaster (www.shupp.org). It includes auth, tls, chkuser a

RE: [vchkpw] Chkuser settings prevent delivery of mail to second domain within same LAN

At 18.06 21/09/2006, you wrote: What you show us is too few. You should check in Exchange the reason why messages have been refused. It looks more a problem of DNS/navigation from Exchange server to qmailtoaster server, but I cannot say without knowing more. Ciao, Tonino   Hi Tonino,   I've got E

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser settings prevent delivery of mail to second domain within same LAN

At 17.09 21/09/2006, you wrote: Hi,   I'm using qmailtoaster.com as both a mail server and a spam-filtering forwarder for two separate organizations.   Mail comes in to the outside interface of the firewall and is port-forwarded to the qmail toaster (192.168.1.3). All traffic for domain1.com and

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

At 16.51 05/09/2006, you wrote: tonix the following information is for my tcp.smtp file? #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE "SENDER_NOCHECK" :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan" 63.245.25.60:allow,SENDER_NOCHECK="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bi

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

e enabling bouncing and chkuser work property, it's my first instalation with version 2 of chkuser, and have this problems. When enable boucing? tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Did you enable bouncing for  each domain? Tonino At 15.31 05/09/2006, you wrote: Make all the changes, but qmail accept em

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

7c84 simscan:[3085]:CLEAN (1.20/3.00):1.0218s:dfsafadsf:65.54.246.86:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.13 04/09/2006, you wrote: make this changes on my server uncoment this lines #define CHKUSER_SENDER_NOCHECK_VARIABLE "SENDER_NOCHECK" #defi

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

TED]> : found existing recipient but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email addrees not exist, why now checkuser not work? tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 20.47 01/09/2006, you wrote: Today setup a new mail server. I have 1 mail server with 2 domain, 1 domain to internet access and 1 domain onl

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail problem

At 10.56 03/09/2006, you wrote: Hi all Some help please We are running a mail server at one of our clients and have picked up the following error when using squirrel mail. Sep 3 10:44:41 mail imapd: LOGIN FAILED, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ip=[127.0.0.1] Sep 3 10:44:41 mail authdaemond: vmysql: sql

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0 problem

At 20.47 01/09/2006, you wrote: Today setup a new mail server. I have 1 mail server with 2 domain, 1 domain to internet access and 1 domain only local user. the server is on my dmz the problem is when the sender is from internal domain the chkuser say the following "CHKUSER rejected sender: from

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

At 19.09 16/08/2006, you wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ > > 127.0.0.1 > > as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending > > account via bounce check (connect

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5 with courier -authlib

At 23.15 12/07/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 18.24 12/07/2006, you wrote: The vpopmail module to authdaemon is might be missing the vpopmail vclose() function. At a first look, you are right. Following is the code related to closing connection. static void authvchkpwclose

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5 with courier -authlib

At 23.02 12/07/2006, you wrote: On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:48, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > At 18.24 12/07/2006, you wrote: > >The vpopmail module to authdaemon is might be missing > >the vpopmail vclose() function. > > At a first look, you are right. > > Follo

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5 with courier -authlib

n every connection to the authdaemon would open a new mysql connection, which allocates memory. Then without the vclose the memory never gets released and eventually runs out of memory. Ken Jones tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I don't know if this is a limit of this useful patch (I don't think

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5 with courier -authlib

;connect" phase, something called thousands times. I'm trying to check, but I'll do better next week. Thanks, Tonino Ken Jones tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I don't know if this is a limit of this useful patch (I don't think so), or more likely of the vpopmail libra

[vchkpw] vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5 with courier -authlib

I don't know if this is a limit of this useful patch (I don't think so), or more likely of the vpopmail library (I feel could be), or yet of courier authdaemon, but after more than ten days of successfull running, I've got this error: Jul 11 16:24:33 myserver authdaemond: ^GOut of memory (Ne

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER for non-netqmail, non-stock-qmail

At 23.09 15/06/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) schrieb: At 16.15 15/06/2006, you wrote: Thanks, Tonino. But isn't that snippet needed for the TLS-support? If you are using specific certificates on client side you probably need it, otherwise it is completely unuseful. Ah, ye

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER for non-netqmail, non-stock-qmail

At 16.15 15/06/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Cut away all these lines: and put the following code: /* start chkuser code */ switch (chkuser_realrcpt (&mailfrom, &addr)) { case CHKUSER_KO: return; break; case CHKUSER_RELAYING: --

Re: [vchkpw] CHKUSER for non-netqmail, non-stock-qmail

Cut away all these lines:  if (relayclient) {    --addr.len;    if (!stralloc_cats(&addr,relayclient)) die_nomem();    if (!stralloc_0(&addr)) die_nomem();  }  else #ifndef TLS    if (!addrallowed()) { err_nogateway(); return; } #else    if (!addrallowed())     { if (ssl) { STACK_OF(X50

Re: [vchkpw] [bug][patch] - vchkpw/vmysql and Mysql 5

Please DON'T underextimate this patch, and put it in vpopmail soon. When you stop MySQL, all services working with vpopmail library and using permanent connections to MySQL (like courier-authdaemon) will stop working. You must restart them after any mysql failure. With this patch, no need to

Re: [vchkpw] rcpt check user problems with sender - resolution

At 00.07 01/06/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 23.25 31/05/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 21.44 31/05/2006, you wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Ken Jones wrote: Hi, Tonino was able to do a fast analysis of the problem. Server: Qmail with Tonino's

  1   2   3   4   >