looking forward to reading this.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
).
I agree, pretty much. This is probably the best 'big picture look at the
WMF I have seen: accomplishments, plans, honest assessments of
challenges. Thanks very much!
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
Chen20471018752.17%
FDC Ombudsman ElectionCandidateSupportNeutralOpposeSupport Ratio
S/S+OUser:Kirill Lokshin - Kirill Lokshin37062710478.06%User:NickK - Mykola
Kozlenko33366110775.68%
Risker
On 15 May 2015 at 19:48, Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On behalf of the 2015
is extensive and my
gratitude is with you all.
Congratulations and thank you to you, Keegan, and to all who have worked on
this project over successive years. Here's hoping the process goes smoothly!
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
On 3 June 2015 at 19:11, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a
public
list of voters who
would be making more difference than being on the FDC would
have. I think there's a fair amount of truth in that.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
diversity, but very poor at implementing it.
Risker/Anne
On 6 June 2015 at 13:55, MF-Warburg mfwarb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I still think it was a big mistake (of the electcom? I don't remember, but
/someone/ pushed it through without discussions) in the 2013 election to
abolish the Schulze
know them today...)
Risker/Anne
On 22 June 2015 at 13:41, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Magnus pointed the way forward when he started MediaWiki. When you look
into the whole stack of his data related tools, you will find how they make
aggregating data a whole lot
articles thinking the same way. Who knows, this might actually sell...
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
Minor correction: Appeals are due JUNE 8, 2015, not July 8.[1]
Risker/Anne
(Member of the FDC)
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Information#Calendar
On 1 June 2015 at 11:18, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote:
Hello Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC
,
and I wonder about other geographically large countries where this would
also be more workable.
Risker
On 28 June 2015 at 01:17, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
I infer that you would have preferred a single US chapter from the start,
wouldn't you?
Il 28/06/2015 06:08
other countries, especially those with a large number of
Wikimedians or a massive geographic area, might wish they had gone with
regional affiliates rather than a national one.
Risker/Anne
On 27 June 2015 at 23:26, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
I know the confederated approach may
significantly elevated levels of protection above
'all administrators on Project ABC', although they may call for another
level of protection that can be customizable to allowing a much smaller
group or specific individuals to be the only editors.
Risker/Anne
On 11 August 2015 at 16:43, Romaine Wiki
, and Superprotect is probably the prettied-up
interface so others can do it), and if there's a problem that serious it is
going to ahve to remain in a broader range of hands.
Risker/Anne
On 11 August 2015 at 17:27, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the time, admins behave as we would hope
to
come up with a solution that works to accommodate both groups.
Risker/Anne
On 20 August 2015 at 01:19, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, Andrew is right. Navigation is a very important focus point of
organising every Wiki Loves Monuments.
The complexity of the navigation
of the scheduling conflict.
Risker/Anne
On 21 August 2015 at 16:22, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
From my perspective, this strikes me as part of the reason why national
organisations are well suited to running the Wikimedia fundraising
campaigns rather than a global organisation: if WMIT
Who said the problem was on enwiki?
On 11 August 2015 at 17:58, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
There are situations where not even the administrators of a particular
community should be allowed to edit a page
On 11 August 2015 at 18:05, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Who said the problem was on enwiki?
If you think this issue is only a problem in some specific place or class
of wikis, then say so. Otherwise, I would
addressed within the
relevant community, or (as in this case) are not being discussed in the
relevant community at all, is not really appropriate, and I for one would
appreciate if you'd stop doing that.
Risker/Anne
On 26 July 2015 at 17:45, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Pinging WMF Legal
working hard to add referencing and
improve what is there already, but it's a huge labour and we shouldn't be
adding to their mountain of work unnecessarily.
Risker/Anne
On 29 October 2015 at 14:37, Romaine Wiki <romaine.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it is time for the ne
reasonable filter. A preference to receive a reminder that Wikidata
is missing would work. But it should not automatically pop up whenever
someone creates an article, which is just as likely to annoy editors.
Risker/Anne
On 29 October 2015 at 16:08, Romaine Wiki <romaine.w...@gma
id nothing.
Copying Joseph in case he wants to respond to some of the discussions here.
Risker/Anne
On 15 November 2015 at 10:36, Pharos <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The figure quoted is quite interesting, but do we have a comparable metric
> for the Wikimedia projects?
any subscriber
behaves inappropriately (e.g., does the person get unsubscribed, is there
an appeal mechanism, what's the complaints mechanism, do affiliates who
have a member "unsubscribed" get to replace that person with someone else,
etc.)
Risker/Anne
___
Thank you to the members whose terms are complete, and congratulations to
Wikimedia Espana on their new board. Best wishes to the new members!
Risker/Anne
On 4 October 2015 at 19:38, Tito Dutta <trulyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Best wishes and congrats.
>
> On 5 October 2015 a
I confess. I have used many adjectives to describe Wikimedians over the
years, but "boring" has never been one of them.
Risker/Anne
On 8 December 2015 at 14:20, Carlos Colina (Maor_X) <ma...@wikimedia.org.ve>
wrote:
> WellIberocoopians always have fun ;-)
&
to
proceed.
Risker/Anne
On 1 December 2015 at 18:09, Mardetanha <mardetanha.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> do we have any definite number that if reach then we would not any
> fundraiser again in the future (I really would like to to see WMF in the
> position in which, it would n
assessments.
Risker/Anne
On 16 December 2015 at 15:22, Toby Negrin <tneg...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> No one asked for 10 more wishes? :)
>
> Thanks Danny and the Community Tech team. This is a great model for working
> with our Communities.
>
> -Toby
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015
Excellent news, Christophe and everyone else at WMFR!
Risker/Anne
On 17 December 2015 at 11:41, Christophe Henner <
christophe.hen...@wikimedia.fr> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A quick email to share with you a good news on our side.
>
> A few month ago, Wikimedia France start
board members who weren't board members
this time last year. By the end of their Wikimania board meeting, we could
have as many as eight trustees with less than 18 months of experience under
their belt. Of all the problems the board has, insufficient turnover is
NOT one of them.
Risker
___
guring out how to grow these projects within the
founding principles is not just important, it's necessary.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lis
ce, its data doesn't even meet the minimal criteria
for verifiability.
Risker/Anne
On 28 December 2015 at 13:00, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All I said is that the wiki way works, that's all. You can't hide it when
> someone tries to take over a project, and that is t
dation
>
>
While you are at it, Patricio, please also publish the names of the two new
Board-appointed trustees.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wi
r Wikimedia
movement entity except WMDE has received in the past three rounds.
User:Risker - FDC member
On 24 November 2015 at 10:13, Nicola Zeuner <nicola.zeu...@wikimedia.de>
wrote:
> Dear Risker, Gerard et al.,
>
> Just a quick correction:
>
> WMDE did indeed provide a d
On 23 November 2015 at 21:04, Pine W wrote:
> Thank you FDC.
>
> Many of the small and midsized APG requests fared well in this round. That
> is nice to see.
>
> I find it concerning that the larger the organization, the more problems
> the FDC seemed to find with the org's
Hello Gerard -
The recommended grant for Wikimedia Deutschland is larger than ever, and
represents a 42% increase from last year's grant. This is a massive
increase. Please don't confuse the fact that WMDE did not get everything
it wanted with whether or not Wikidata is underfunded. Remember,
solicited, and further follow-up emails about this time's process.
Risker
On 10 January 2016 at 21:18, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl>
> wrote:
> > I can, however, generally add that we have not c
to the posting of her own direct salary for the 2015-16
fiscal year, despite the fact that it would not come close to the Form 990
reporting threshold.
Risker
On 7 June 2016 at 20:42, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for pointing that out, Risker. The emails indeed cr
ressed by checkusers on different projects is
very different.
Risker/Anne
On 7 June 2016 at 15:01, Sydney Poore <sydney.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My suggestion is to come up with a general type training that can work for
> all administrators and functionaries since all have the freedom
y be useful in other
contexts as well.
Risker/Anne
On 1 June 2016 at 09:18, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl> wrote:
> hi James,
>
> thanks for your input. One of the reasons for the survey is asking the
> community what they think about the key qualities. I think it is quite
&g
as Chair. Thank you as
well to Alice for her service as Vice Chair.
Risker/Anne
On 24 June 2016 at 09:49, Jan-Bart de Vreede <jdevre...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> Congratulations go to Christophe, and also thank you for making yourself a
> candidate. Your years of experience in
mmediately dumped to the bottom of
the drawer when it comes to Wikidata. First we'll make it easy for them to
edit. Then we'll include a whole pile of data that they can't edit -or at
least can't edit on the website they logged into. They're pretty opposite
ideas, but of course that's considered luddite th
an excuse for the community's comments to be ignored "because they don't
know the facts". So let's lay out all the facts on the table, please.
Risker/Anne
On 16 January 2016 at 15:06, Vituzzu <vituzzu.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for sharing this but, above all, to fo
a more permanent way, such as the "learnings"
that many groups have created and shared with the assistance of Community
Engagement. I'm sure we can think of more ways to share information that
doesn't involve people having to fly half-way around the world and spend
thousands of dollars.
Risker/Anne
On 9
that they should
be consulted and possibly should actively approve any grant applications
where the dollar value sought is higher than that amount. I don't believe
the current policies require advance approval or even advance notification,
though.
Risker/Anne
On 12 February 2016 at 03:54, Gerard Meijssen
wherever you wind up - and I'm glad to hear you
plan to stick around as a volunteer. All the best!
Risker/Anne
On 11 February 2016 at 20:24, Siko Bouterse <sboute...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Dear friends and colleagues,
>
> I’ve had the amazing privilege of serving this movement in a
I am sure the agenda was prepared well in advance and before the events of
the last 48 hours; however, it should be noted that there are now *two*
open board seats (one community-selected, one Board-appointed).
Risker/Anne
On 29 January 2016 at 09:01, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com>
Congratulations and thanks to the new Bangladeshi board.
Risker/Anne
On 27 January 2016 at 12:46, Subhashish Panigrahi <subhash...@cis-india.org>
wrote:
> Wow, three friends already! :)
>
> Congratulations everyone. Looking forward to hear more on the new EC's
> work soon.
ppropriate to a limited number
of articles but would be inappropriate or even offensive in other
presentations.
Risker/Anne
On 30 January 2016 at 13:37, Haitham Shammaa <hsham...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> In addition to Maggie's attempt to explain why the numbers might seem
ve for voters
and (c) has some sort of process for voters to identify clearly the
candidates they feel are very inappropriate for the role.
While we're at it...diversity remains a very serious problem for the
Board. Does the community voting process want to try to take that on? How
would we do such a
Well done, all! It is really impressive to see such excellent
collaboration between free knowledge open source communities. Everyone
should take a bow.
Risker/Anne
On 28 January 2016 at 23:16, Tito Dutta <trulyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations. :)
>
> On 29 January 2016
to keep them editing,
>
I've never, ever seen the WMF (or any other Wikimedia community or
organization) suggest trapping editors in feedback loops. Wanting
community members to stay (or finding out why they're leaving) is not
"trapping" anyone.
Risker/Anne
_
Somewhat off-topic comment:
Andreas, the way you are formatting your messages (especially with that
---o0o--- symbol), it's pretty much impossible to differentiate what you're
saying and what you're quoting from someone else. Could you please be much
more clear on this?
Risker/Anne
On 28
Well, Sarah, after all of these years I didn't think you'd come up with
anything that would surprise me. I was wrong, And I'll say that if I was
going to favour paying anyone, it would be paying qualified translators to
support smaller projects, and Wikisourcers, and people who may have the
On 24 February 2016 at 21:16, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, Sarah, after all of these years I didn't think you'd come up with
> anything that would surprise me. I was wrong, And I'll say that if I was
> going to favour paying anyone, it would be paying qualif
he
editing group over all other stakeholders. I'd like to see some
suggestions that are more balanced.
Risker
On 24 February 2016 at 22:27, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:01 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Congratulations, Katy! It's been a pleasure working with you on the FDC
for the last two years, and I will look forward to continuing to work with
you in your new role.
Risker/Anne
On 25 February 2016 at 18:04, Philippe Beaudette <phili...@beaudette.me>
wrote:
> Congrats to
have no inside knowledge or any reason at all to
believe that this is what occurred on the WMF Board. But I can think of
several other similar scenarios that would fall into the same "honest but
not transparent" response.
So please, let's stop pretending those two words mean the same thing.
Risk
of the
process, were much closer to root causes here.
That's just one example.
Risker/Anne
On 26 February 2016 at 21:04, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Risker and Brion:
>
> I very much agree with the principles you're stating, and am coming to
> realize I sho
more on problem identification first.
Risker/Anne
On 26 February 2016 at 19:44, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To Oliver and Keegan -- I hear you guys loud and clear, and I am very aware
> that the trauma of the last few months has taken this kind of toll.
> Although
of change is
likely to be at least partly responsible for some of the unfortunate
situations we have seen in the last several months. But those who are
seeking a new board...well, you already have one.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guid
e that his
statement is based on some known information. It may come as a surprise to
a lot of people, but Wikia's software has been increasingly diverging from
the MediaWiki we all use on Wikimedia projects, and they already have
better inter-wiki search than WMF projects have.
Risker/Anne
On 26 Feb
This is really cool, Yuri! Thank you for sharing this.
Risker
On 22 February 2016 at 22:15, Yuri Astrakhan <yastrak...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> First complex interactive graph in Wikipedia explores the most expensive
> paintings in history. Move the mouse around to view i
ny way - it
> > wasn't. But trying to reframe things in "oh, evil WMF did all wrong
> against
> > the poor, innocent community" terms serves no purpose other than create a
> > windmill to tilt at.
>
> It is comments like this from WMF staff which
ely freaked out at that level of "notice" and would never have
edited again.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubs
Thanks to MADe, M0tty and Dimi z - and congratulations and best wishes to
the new members and the entire board.
Risker/Anne
On 23 January 2016 at 20:11, Romaine Wiki <romaine.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We as Wikimedia Belgium now have a new board installed w
Thanks to Wikimedia Argentina for this work - and to the Wikimedians of
Argentina for sharing their experiences.
Risker/Anne
On 22 January 2016 at 08:56, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, it's gorgeous. Well done all.
>
> Anthony Cole
>
>
> On Fri,
Indeed. I was rather shocked to find that I was winding up on the
Wikimedia Foundation site every time I clicked on to Meta...
Risker/Anne
On 26 January 2016 at 13:45, Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net> wrote:
> Also Commons, and anything else at *.wikimedia.org. Apparently, "Ba
...And Mediawikiwiki, where I tried to log into Phabricator...
Risker/Anne
On 26 January 2016 at 13:46, Lane Rasberry <l...@bluerasberry.com> wrote:
> And Commons.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pharos <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
ow much was actually requested in this case, only what was granted.)
Risker/Anne
On 12 February 2016 at 21:23, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anne, regarding:
>
> "Since the Board must approve acceptance of any donations over $100,000
> USD, it seems to be obvious
to obtain visas and
we generally have far more disposable income to attend these events.
Risker/Anne
On 18 February 2016 at 19:04, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The first thing that happens when you split up something like Wikimania in
> multiple events is you mu
hings from a very different perspective
than others.
Risker/Anne
On 18 February 2016 at 21:04, Lane Rasberry <l...@bluerasberry.com> wrote:
> SJ,
>
> Can you please contact any Wikimedia chapter and ask them to request
> nominations?
>
> There are two criteria for nomina
for the chapter group, either through the
coordination group or through some other means, to be more specific in what
kinds of talents and characteristics they'd like to see in candidates.
Risker/Anne
On 18 February 2016 at 22:18, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Risker, I t
y "don't beat up on people who have different levels of information".
Risker/Anne
On 20 February 2016 at 20:31, Brandon Harris <bhar...@gaijin.com> wrote:
>
> Danny, don't kid yourself! The folks at Wikipediocracy know
> everything about everything that's happened
broker be brought in to hold a
> meeting with staff and Lila and find solutions?
>
> Perhaps the Board could organize something like this.
>
>
It is my understanding this was done some months ago.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, g
As has already been explained on this list, many people do not have access
to Facebook. If this is something germane and useful to a lot of people on
this list, perhaps it would be appropriate to ask Jonathan to post it here.
Risker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 18:34, Anthony Cole <ahc
parties cannot even read, let alone participate in, unless
they're willing to give up some fairly significant privacy. I am
disappointed, but I do not hold it against anyone for preferring to discuss
issues in a venue not associated with Wikimedia.
Risker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 19:01, Craig
to be on Facebook would agree there's a bit of an irony on talking about
the respect for Wikimedia community values on a site that explicitly
doesn't share them.
That, and it's a bit unfair to tease people.
Risker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 22:01, Gergő Tisza <gti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On
t;
>
I can think of Echo/Notifications which, despite some rather minor
grumblings and need for a few tweaks at the beginning, has been fully
embraced by the community. It's not entirely perfect for all use cases,
but it is so much better than anything we had before. It's become so
nat
On 29 February 2016 at 20:43, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > So please, let's stop pretending those two words mean the same thing.
> >
>
>
> They don't mea
I think it is probably best that human resources issues (including the
reasons for people leaving the organization) are not included in this list,
unless expressly disclosed by the individuals.
Risker
On 14 March 2016 at 12:14, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Um. Luis, if you wer
just resigned, too, and has yet to be replaced.
Risker/Anne
On 12 March 2016 at 21:09, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On March 1, Jimmy Wales wrote:[1]
>
> things like standard boilerplate language to be signed by
> > all employees doesn't strike me as somet
uld result in a large settlement, either individually or as a group
(think high-tech employees lawsuit). This is an area where "transparency"
very definitely intersects with the privacy rights of those individuals who
are directly affected. Privacy should win.
Risker/Anne
On 14 March 2
Well, Pete, I certainly interpreted Nathan's question as being specific
enough to require that a number be given.
On 14 March 2016 at 14:28, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ther
mpact on
their future earnings and ability to secure future employment.
Risker/Anne
On 14 March 2016 at 13:37, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We need to distinguish between the personal and private details of
> individuals and the policies of the WMF around management of e
as it is in Europe.
None of this has any bearing whatsoever on the Wikimedia Foundation; I have
no doubt it would follow the applicable legislation should the employees
wish to unionize.
Risker/Anne
On 9 March 2016 at 08:12, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> It i
on the nature of the disclosure.
There have been transparency problems, no question about it. But they had
nothing to do with NDAs. Let's leave NDAs out of it at this point.
They're absolutely not within Community Engagement's purview.
Risker/Anne
On 12 March 2016 at 22:11, Andreas Kolbe <ja
"Requests for transparency" is highly inaccurate; what you are requesting
is information. The two are not synonymous. I have moved the page to the
more correct name.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_information
On 12 March 2016 at 22:18, SarahSV wrote:
>
ct of
board/executive transparency) or human resources issue (in respect of
NDAs). It's pretty obvious from what has bubbled to the surface over the
last few months that transparency was NOT just an issue from the community
perspective. Perhaps a transparency officer in Legal might make sense.
Katherine, thank you for agreeing to take on this responsibility. I look
forward to working with you and the rest of the team in the months to come.
Risker/Anne
On 10 March 2016 at 22:52, Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Katherine,
>
> Welcome, and best of luck in your n
Wow, Andreas. That's taking several major leaps of logic. Sometimes a
cigar is just a cigar. Any reason why you brought these rather
extraordinary assumptions to this mailing list before Susanna had even had
a chance to respond to your question at her nomination page?
Risker/Anne
On 2 March
On 3 March 2016 at 10:36, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2016 7:00 AM, "Risker" <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those who think it's an easy task that should be
> > able to be done practically after the meeting is over tend to have no
On 3 March 2016 at 09:22, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > For the WMF board, we throw in the additional complexity of having a
> large
> > part o
ns needs to deal with.
I would love for the board to be able to complete and approve their meeting
minutes within a few weeks. I understand why they have a hard time.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.or
us. Pierre's concern is that the board thought it was a
good idea to keep an ED with a 90% staff disapproval rating.
Risker/Anne
On 7 March 2016 at 18:24, jytdog <jyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pierre that is exactly what I struggle with. You are saying that throwing
> integrity out th
, or a non-profit.
It strikes me that the key question the Board needs to think about is
whether they want a manager, a leader or a visionary.
Risker/Anne
On 7 March 2016 at 01:48, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the topic of researching what makes someone a successful CEO (a
I agree with Craig on the most reasonable interpretation of the limited
commentary from the Board in recent weeks. Indeed, it would be quite
normal, even expected, to include a mutual non-disparagement clause in any
separation agreement, which by its very nature is confidential.
Risker/Anne
for this oversight role.
Risker/Anne
On 4 April 2016 at 16:54, Greg Varnum <gvar...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Forward on behalf of Kelly Battles.
>
>
>
> Hello All -
>
> My name is Kelly Bodnar Battles and I am honored to have joined the
> Wikimedia Foundation Board of Tr
Just noting that 1700-1800 PDT on Wednesday May 11 is -0100 UTC on
Thursday May 12. Based on the link given, this seems to be when the meeting
will be held. Please verify.
Risker/Anne
On 4 May 2016 at 21:28, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forwarding.
>
> Pine
> --
aisals should be published. It would
probably violate quite a few labour and human rights laws, not to mention
the separation agreement that no doubt exists. That's not transparency,
it's prurience.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
htt
languages of
the Indian subcontinent, and that somehow it is the WMF's fault.
Risker/Anne
On 28 June 2016 at 11:51, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Anders Wennersten
> <m...@anderswennersten.se> wrote:
> > I have been acti
201 - 300 of 420 matches
Mail list logo