and so the full pressure generated
from the thermal decomposition of the LiAlH4 was applied to the stainless
tube.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I for one did not understand that the center tube was made from
stainless steel. Apparently
Having a switching control of the heater bias is not at all going to fix a
reactor that is unstable once it reaches a critical temperature. Such a
reactor will continue to rise in temperature with NO input at all (pulse
width =0). Such devices as have been shown today have essentially a fixed
. It is worth additional experiments and data taking, all
of which will require good seal technology.
MFMP is beginning to get feedback from Dr. Parkhomov.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
CB Sites--
Check out the following for LiAlH4
in the molten metal was melted LiH, an ionic hydride - the
molten metal was probably saturated with hydrogen in the form of H- anions
as part of the ionic hydride of Li. This appears to be a [liquid metal
ionic hydride - Ni] reaction, not a gas phase reaction.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:03
I brought up this in an internal MFMP discussion and I would be interested
in getting input from the Vorts on the topic.
I have been thinking about thermocouple measurements with a reactor tube or
a glow stick. I now believe it is a bad idea to measure the core
temperature inside the tube as a
The LockTherm testing is certainly interesting, but it is not clear to me
that it has any advantage over Parkhomov. I have seen no additional
videos, nor have I heard that they achieved excess heat.
An interesting phase of this whole Parkhomov/Rossi fuel is what is
happening in the 700-1100ºC
together and making the geometry between grains
smaller. IMHO a more robust dynamic tapestry of smaller geometries is
better than loosely packed larger geometries.
Regards
Fran
*From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2015 12:34 PM
*To:* vortex-l
are spent sealing the tubes.
LockTherm is only using fused quartz tubes. This won't allow them to work
at the Parkhomov pressures. And, we have no reports of excess heat from
them.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø
Ø The LockTherm
resolution mass spec]
- XRD
- Thermocouple calibration furnace
- IR spectroscopy
Please feel to private email me if you think you can help.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Higgins comments are right on.
MFMP should do mass spec analysis
.
What MS studies are you talking about?
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, March 08, 2015 1:31 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Critique of Levi et al. Lugano experiment
I don't believe Ed Storms and Kiva Labs has
Be careful not to read too much into the USPTO's stamp of final
rejection. It is not uncommon to receive this notice during the process
of patent prosecution. I have issued patents, which, during the course of
prosecution, got stamped final rejection. It is time for the patent
attorneys to do
It is not clear from your description of this book on the website, but it
appears to be a compilation of the published work of others plus pure
speculation by R. Ventola. Does author Ventola have any first hand
knowledge of the construction and fueling of the HotCat?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:58
meticulous measurements.
Fran
*From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2015 9:01 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Questions Raised by Parkhomov Experiment
Failure
From the pictures I saw, Parkhomov changed to use a separate
I don't know why you think it would be less safe to run LiAlH4 by itself in
the reactor. As the temperature rises and H2 is released, the liquid Li is
also being released. If there is oxygen present, it will form LiOH which
doesn't decompose until over 900C. This is the first stage of O2
Yes, this is why I was worried about Alexander's new design that puts an
air gap and another ceramic around the reactor core - increasing its
thermal resistance to the lower temperature air around it and/or the water
in the calorimeter. He already showed that if he put alumina powder
insulating
Ryan Hunt would better to ask this question. I believe the reactor tube in
the Bang! experiment was from CoorsTek. The other dogbone alumina tubes
were also from CoorsTek. They have an online store.
It is the dogbone Lugano HotCat replica that has the heater coil wrapped
around a second
Axil, what you are describing as proper sized and tubercles are
applicable to Rossi's low temperature catalyzed Ni fuel. This is not what
was used in the HotCat or Parkhomov experiment. SEM images of the Ni core
from the MFMP experiment (Bang!) show that early on the Ni particles are
completely
:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil, what you are describing as proper sized and tubercles are
applicable to Rossi's low temperature catalyzed Ni fuel.
For a temperature of 1200C, the proper size is about 2 microns give or
take.
This is not what
.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil, have you looked at the SEM images (courtesy of Ed Storms) of the Ni
from the MFMP reactor?
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2fllFSWpFNVJoUlIxbERhRTE2M2FTY0s3TU9sZ2FsVG5wMGdodlE2ZW1JMVEusp
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that is correct. We do not have an SEM of Parkhomov's Ni
particles. You don't know that they were not similar to MFMP's. However,
the same thing happened to Parkhomov's particles as the MFMP particles
Inline below...
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I meant exactly what I said. Do I have justification? Yes. The first
is that Parkhomov's experiment appears to have worked
See inline ...
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A sign that the nickel power is not working is the explosions that are
occurring when the LENR reactions begin in the nano particles produced by
lithium and hydrogen plasma as it cools from the high
so seal some with Parkhomov's formula.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since the SEM images of the fuel
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id
that there seemed to be a start of an excess heat reaction
prior to the bangs, however the extent of this production of excess heat
was not very long. )
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 PM
This is not true. There are many physical and chemical thing happening
that set the stage for LENR, and just because the stage has been set, it
doesn't mean the show started. The chemical changes are the dissociation
of the LiAlH4 and the dissolving of the Ni (at higher temperatures). The
Mats, you are a brave and insightful journalist. I believe you will one
day be rewarded for capturing the birth of a critical new technology for
the future of our planet and its people.
[If not, you will still have gained the experiences needed to become a
blues musician.]
Bob Higgins
On Wed
This is a wonderful video, so thanks for pointing us to watch it. However,
the molten Li-Al is not in a super-critical phase, but as he said, it
doesn't have to be supercritical - just hot and high pressure. He also
demonstrated a chemical mixing that produced nanoparticles as a
precipitate.
One of the things not sampled in the Lugano experiment is the product gas
or gas ash. This may have very important clues to the nature of the
reaction. In my replication (under construction), I intend to be able to
collect the product gas for analysis off-site. We could find enhanced
deuterium,
Thanks Fran. I would love to be able to just see the XH to start. It
would be a happy circumstance to then go on to evolve the software control
to regulate temperature by modulating the thermal load.
I am most of the way through making the small pieces for the convection
system (it will have 4
From the pictures I saw, Parkhomov changed to use a separate tube for the
heater. If nichrome does make a difference, it would have to be against
the alumina reactor tube. So, if you use the heater tube, it wouldn't make
any difference if it was kanthal or nichrome - the H2 would leak out of the
If you looked at the links for my calorimeter (in my previous post), you
would see that it is a 20 gallon metal fish tank (a garbage can). Instead
of glass that would be cool for a movie for seeing through, the metal can
makes it less breakable, and the copper container for the reactor conducts
in LENR.
Bob Higgins
would only increase the tube diameter, causing a bigger
change in the dead volume.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bob and Mark--
One potential minor correction to the volume should account for the
increase (or decrease)in volume
the
numerical mistake at the end.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2WWVmdHRjVmVHMDAauthuser=0
Bob Higgins
there is a significant amount of Ni. Note: Ed's EDX analysis of the
solidified Li-Al showed almost 4% Ni, but the percentage did not include
the Li (which EDX does not detect), so the actual percentage of Ni in
solution may have been more like 2%.
Bob Higgins
?
*From:* Bob Higgins
Also, here is the link to the periodic screen captures:
http://bit.ly/1DzPIM2
This will allow you to actually read the temperatures and pressures in the
graphs.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alberto De Souza
alberto.investi...@gmail.com wrote:
http
I asked if they could do this. We'll see. The problem is that Alan does
not have sufficient computer capability to continuously upload to HUGnet.
So the only one that can do this data dump is Alan. Alan says the CPU is
at the limit and he is afraid of a crash if he tries to do this. So,
Parkhomov replication experiment to date. There are sure to be better
experiments to come, but lets give Alan his due for putting together a good
experiment.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
MFMP didn't show COP1, with the dog bone
There were a couple of reasons. First, Alan was at near maximum power when
the reactor tube outside temperature was 900C and the internal core
temperature was over 1200C. The Kanthal A1 heater wire would have burned
out by the time the reactor tube temperature could have been driven to
1200C,
with the Pd cathode, amplifying the
overall excess heat.
I agree that the presence of Li in systems producing excess heat is a
noticeable coincidence. How it is implicated at a Pd cathode is a mystery.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:56 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's
Years ago when I built a sonoluminescence apparatus and was investigating
its properties, I read of some systems that used alpha particles and
neutrons to stimulate bubbles which would migrate to the acoustic field
center. So, generally, alpha, neutrons, and protons may stimulate a bubble
in
that is available, as an initial high energy
particle is Compton scattered in a dense atom field. At some point, it
would seem that the energy of the particle will be just right for
neutrino/anti-neutrino formation.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote
By 300C, and in the presence of the released H2, the Ni particles have been
reduced of their oxice and are sintered together into a spongy solid. It
remains this way until the LiH and Al have melted, and then the web of
SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
and
research lab.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
This suggests that something nuclear is happening in the branch of the
reaction that results in the ejection of the 6 MeV proton
Thanks Robin. Can you give me the leads you found and/or the search terms
you used so I can be sure to find the ones you saw? I will follow up with
additional searching. If I can find some that appear to fit with
Piantelli's experiment, I will forward them to him and offer to make
contact with
is being
produced? Why 1200 C when the outside is at only 900 C?
Something does not seem to add up in that calibration run, or perhaps I
just missed a fine point that you can help explain. Thanks.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
Tungsten has a very high melting point, but it suffers badly from oxidation
and will fail at 1000C if exposed to O2. Kanthal A1 is one of the best
alloys for a heater coil that can survive in the presence of O2 (leakage)
and it is reasonably ductile for forming. Ductility is important because
if
Daniel, I got an email response to you from Dennis Cravens (who reads
Vortex-l):
One easy way is a carbon welding rod. ---Cheap and most have copper
coatings that can be easily pealed off and also be used for easy
connections. They are also useful for current shunts.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:18
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates
the entire scenario since Li-7 is NOT depleted according to the Lugano
report - but instead is converted to Li-6.
What I drew from the report was the only thing that can
(for example liquid density of 6LiH vs 7LiH)?
I am not questioning that the isotopic ratio is changing, only that the
change appears bigger at the surface than in the particle as a whole.
Bob
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Jones, What
as a booster for his reactors
- using the Li to create excess heat from the 6 MeV protons being produced
(resulting in more than 6 MeV of heat per proton). However, he does have
excess heat without the Li.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:30 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Bob Higgins's
Piantelli's theory says that H- anions are responsible for the Ni-H LENR
reaction. According to his theory, the H- anion, as a composite fermion,
enters the Ni atom much as would a muon. Somehow (and Piantelli doesn't
say how) the large H- anion must become a compact negatively charged object
. Finding a measurable percentage of the sample gas to be He could
confidently be determined to be a reaction product rather than
contamination due to the higher pressure of the sample container which
could not have been produced from atmospheric contamination.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM
they
were all consumed in the subsequent LENR reaction. That seems unlikely to
me.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:09 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat
Also, here is the link to the periodic screen captures:
http://bit.ly/1DzPIM2
This will allow you to actually read the temperatures and pressures in the
graphs.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Alberto De Souza
alberto.investi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://youtu.be/zMs8XwF22Dk
, Be, etc.
that could be sold to pay for more Li? A new industry will develop to
monetize the recycling.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Lewan Mats's message of Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:05:31 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Predicted lithium shortages are leading
The real disadvantage of the thermal imagers and spot sensors is that they
cannot reach in and see the temperature of the core or a spot related to
core temperature. In the Parkhomov experiments, there is a measure of
insulation between the core and the visibly accessible outside of the
and mouse -ish to me.
I think the cat mouse are probably much less exotic than what has been
proposed in this thread.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:19:04 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The Hot cat reactor has
more likely that a small XH will be detected before you optimize to
realize a larger COP.
Bob Higgins
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:39 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Jones,
I agree with your desire to find an easy to use and inexpensive heating
method. I am just pointing out
Type B thermocouples are expensive; even for fine wire, short, uninsulated
couples, because they are made from platinum. They may be 10x more
expensive than type-K and extension wires are just as expensive.
Additionally the signal level is smaller with type-B which means more noise
in the
However, Maly Vavra, and Naudts predict the lowest DDL state as giving up
510 keV to be reached, not 3.56 keV. That is 2 orders of magnitude lower
energy for their DDL solution than what you are describing. Where has all
the energy gone in this calculation?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:52 PM,
are there by
chance, and probably also unreasonable to think they wouldn't dissolve in
the very active liquid metal environment. Rossi is known to have used Fe
in his low temperature eCat fuel.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The nickel particles grains looks like
in the FUEL. Replicators do not
do this. They use untreated nickel powder. Have you all missed this?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Note that there are many optimizations of carbonyl processing designed to
produce, in particular, long strand connected
in any of
the MFMP replication attempts. Perhaps Parkhomov's grinding/mixing is a
partial substitute for Rossi's pre-processing of the Ni powder with LiAlH4.
Bob Higgins
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg
This paper also has a great deal of similarity to the claims being made for
HHO systems which use a modified automobile catalytic converter to
re-combine the HHO into water. These catalytic converters use
nano-catalysts (including Pd) embedded in a ceramic matrix (similar to
catalysts used by B.
in the Rossi fuel
(from Rossi's pre-processing); and may never have existed in the Lugano
reactor as LiAlH4.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The micrograph on page 44 lends substance to the speculation that neither
the nickel powder nor the old
. The
mass-to-charge ratio is a physical quantity which is widely used in the
electrodynamics and charge varies linearly according to mass AFAIK.
*From:* Bob Higgins
Jones, you are the first to discuss the variable mass of the proton. The
Vavra and Maly solution (which agrees with Naudts
Jones, you are the first to discuss the variable mass of the proton. The
Vavra and Maly solution (which agrees with Naudts) is for the
proton/electron system. There is nothing that says that all of that energy
must come from the electron. Why couldn't it come from the energy of the
system as a
I am just going from memory, but I believe the difference is that
positronium is the state of an electron and positron orbiting each other
BEFORE the 1.2 MeV is emitted. Once the 1.2 MeV is emitted, the orbiting
pair shrink (like a hydrino) and drop out of detectability.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at
According to Hotson, the positrons and electrons are never created nor
destroyed. Because they are both fermions, they can never occupy the same
space at the same time and so can never annihilate each other. Instead,
upon combination, the electron and positron become an epo atom with each
According to Hotson, pair production is not matter creation, it is only
ionizing an epo (electron - positron pair in a DDL-like orbit). To me,
this is far more plausible than matter creation.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Steven,
It’s called “pair
The problem I have with this analysis is that in the Lugano reaction, whose
fuel/ash analyses are the basis of the hypothesis, the Ni seemed to have
been largely converted to 62Ni and the Li converted almost completely to
6Li; yet in the experiment, the excess heat showed no signs of abatement.
as to
leave an enriched mix of liquid LiH?
Bob Higgins
.
A possible counter argument would be that the fully populated Lithium
tri-hydrinohydride would not be ionizable and hence not detectable in
SIMS. However, a Lithium + 1 or 2 hydrinohydrides should be ionizable and
should populate m/z = 8,9 and these are not seen.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:13
against other company's portfolios - trading
cross-licensing to keep yourself from being litigated. Rossi needs his own
patent portfolio.
Bob Higgins
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net
wrote:
Question about trade secrets and patent enforcement:
How does
That may be true, but they are only guaranteeing that it will work for 1
year. And, it is not clear that they are guaranteeing that it will still
produce 10WH / day at the end of one year. The internal lithium battery
will probably only last about 2 years. That is a total of about 3.6kWH of
they currently show
> is far from matured applications and integration. The first home VCR also
> weighted 15Kg. I'd like my mobile phone having this technology embedded.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That may
Ron Kita has alerted me to a conference with a session on LENR in 2016. It
is the STAIF 2, the "Space Technology & Applications International Forum"
in Albuquerque, NM USA on April 21-23, 2016. Here is the link to their
site:
http://staif2.org/
They have a session G on LENR that will be
. The way I understand it, all of the energy has a mass
> equivalent.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Sun, Oct 25, 2015 3:05 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:slide deck for ul
Having retired from 37 years in the portable electronics world, I hate
these scenarios where LENR are suggested for application to cellphones.
They all suffer from the same problem as the fuel cell powered cellphone -
waste heat. When a Li battery discharges in powering a phone it produces
very
Jones,
Once again you slapped your glove on Hotson's face. Your comment, "No one
needs to be convinced that matter and antimatter can be made to annihilate"
is just such a slap. Regarding electrons and positrons in particular,
Hotson rightly points out that these two particles are fermions. As
To Jones' point regarding annihilation and disintegration ... These are not
the same. Annihilation is the total conversion of entities having mass
into energy. Disintegration is the breakup of a composite particle into
its constituents.
To Eric's question ... A proton is a composite particle.
ned
> that his supplier in Italy required months to make a batch of active
> reactant. Could it be that Rossi has been inadvertently getting dense
> hydrogen all along?
>
> The presentation of Alan Goldwater was very impressive. I am confident
> that if and when Alan announces thermal
t 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Regarding electrons and positrons in particular, Hotson rightly points out
>> that these two particles are fe
e tip. This mechanism is an EMF
> amplification mechanism. This mechanism has been experimentally verified
> and I have shown fluorescent micrograph pictures of this process here
> multiple times.
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
Axil, if you want to be informed about electrons and
radiation/non-radiation, you should read G. H. Goedecke's paper,
"Classically Radiationless Motions and Possible Implications for Quantum
Theory", Physical Review, Volume 135, Number 1B, July 13, 1964. It tells
of the criteria for electron
com> wrote:
> Do you have a link address?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Axil, if you want to be informed about electrons and
>> radiation/non-radiation, you should read G. H. Goedecke's paper,
>> &q
I think you are asking the correct questions. As I have come to read more
about the RM and think about their behavior, I have come to respect
Winterberg's concept to a greater degree.
The RM snowflakes have a high magnetic moment due to their large flat
orbitals, and apparently the atoms in the
It is an interesting speculation. Nature is a truly immense experiment,
particularly when considering the number of atoms present. Immense nuclear
trials are constantly happening all around us. If this type of sub-nuclear
shuffle were happening with the "less difficulty" that you describe, it
I think the answer to your question about gradual decoherence of the
magnetic domains might actually be the opposite. Remember your old
horseshoe magnets? They were always stored with a "keeper" so as to keep
the magnetic field strong. I think what would happen over time is that the
magnet will
The concept of the fractional charge quarks as constituents of matter is a
completely made-up story/hypothesis. Has anyone ever measured an
elementary particle with a charge other than an integer multiple of e?
Hotson proposes that because of this the electron IS the one and only
fundamental
neutrinos? Sounds
> like I need to do some reading.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 16 nov. 2015, at 17:18, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The concept of the fractional charge quarks as constituents of matter is a
> completely made-up story/hypothesis. H
The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is presently a measurement in need of an
explanation. To my knowledge, no one is attributing fractional charge to
an individual elementary particle in attempted explanation of the data.
The theories seem to revolve around collective phenomena.
On Mon, Nov 16,
Jones, your description below about metallic hydrogen stimulates me to
wonder about atoms, molecules, particles, and condensed matter. Obviously
a single atom of H is not metallic hydrogen. A single molecule of hydrogen
is more "dense" than the H/D(1) species of Rydberg matter. I don't think
ar cluster that it would
destroy itself.
Like a molecule, the Rydberg matter behaves with one quantum state. So, is
it a very large molecule or a room temperature BEC? I am not sure of the
distinction.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
LENR reaction?
Somewhere, Miley and Holmlid parted theoretical company. I think that
Miley may believe that the RM particles could be complicit in LENR, but
perhaps he didn't buy into the ultra-dense hypothesis.
Bob Higgins
>From my side of a recent private discussion of Holmlid ... I thought some
of it would add to this topic:
>From what I have seen of Miley's work, Miley does not believe the
ultra-dense form of hydrogen is something that forms on a surface or can
exist in the air. He thinks it is a form that
Jones,
Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says
that the ultra-dense form only occurs with deuterium), then it is highly
likely that it would be a type II superconductor, like all of the
superconductors above about 40K. The type II superconductors pin a
magnetic
get at the truth.
Bob Higgins
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> In short (at the risk of being repetitive) ... this theory is an
>> embarrassment t
mal)
neutrons. These could also produce a beta signature in his scintillator,
but the velocity would not correlate to the measured 13ns particles.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@g
301 - 400 of 777 matches
Mail list logo
