dmarc  

Messages by Date

• 2024/03/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/10 [dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n Douglas Foster
• 2024/03/10 [dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/10 [dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/10 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 10 06:00:04 2024 John Levine
• 2024/03/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF OLIVIER HUREAU
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Benny Pedersen
• 2024/03/09 [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/09 [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/09 [dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Hector Santos
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/08 [dmarc-ietf] SHOULD (was Re: Another point for SPF advice) Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/08 [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/07 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Todd Herr
• 2024/03/07 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Todd Herr
• 2024/03/07 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/06 [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Todd Herr
• 2024/03/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Todd Herr
• 2024/03/06 [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
• 2024/03/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
• 2024/03/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Barry Leiba
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Barry Leiba
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Scott Kitterman
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Scott Kitterman
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Richard Clayton
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Scott Kitterman
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Scott Kitterman
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Todd Herr
• 2024/03/05 [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/05 [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/04 [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Break SPF response: DKIM Only Chuhan Wang
• 2024/03/04 [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS Chuhan Wang
• 2024/03/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS Hector Santos
• 2024/03/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Hector Santos
• 2024/03/04 [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/04 [dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/03/03 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 3 06:00:04 2024 John Levine
• 2024/03/03 [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics vesely
• 2024/03/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/03/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 Tim Wicinski
• 2024/03/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags vesely
• 2024/03/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags John R Levine
• 2024/03/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Seth Blank
• 2024/03/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags John Levine
• 2024/03/01 [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Todd Herr
• 2024/03/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt vesely
• 2024/03/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 John Levine
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only Richard Clayton
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Dotzero
• 2024/02/29 [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Mark Alley
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 John Levine
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
• 2024/02/29 [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only Benny Pedersen
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS John Levine
• 2024/02/29 [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14 Barry Leiba
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 OLIVIER HUREAU
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 Todd Herr
• 2024/02/29 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema Todd Herr
• 2024/02/28 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt Brotman, Alex
• 2024/02/28 [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt internet-drafts
• 2024/02/28 [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30 Barry Leiba
• 2024/02/28 [dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS Barry Leiba
• 2024/02/28 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/28 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt Todd Herr
• 2024/02/28 [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt internet-drafts
• 2024/02/28 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema Todd Herr
• 2024/02/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema Brotman, Alex
• 2024/02/14 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/11 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Feb 11 06:00:04 2024 John Levine
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Benny Pedersen
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Scott Kitterman
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Jim Fenton
• 2024/02/10 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Hector Santos
• 2024/02/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Jim Fenton
• 2024/02/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" John R. Levine
• 2024/02/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Todd Herr
• 2024/02/08 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Jeroen Massar
• 2024/02/07 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Todd Herr
• 2024/02/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Jeroen Massar
• 2024/02/06 Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" John Levine
• 2024/02/06 [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim" Jeroen Massar
• 2024/02/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/05 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From John Levine
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/04 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/02/03 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/02/03 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/02/02 [dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Not having a session at IETF 119 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• 2024/01/31 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/01/28 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement Richard Clayton
• 2024/01/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement John Levine
• 2024/01/27 [dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement Ted Wham
• 2024/01/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Scott Kitterman
• 2024/01/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/01/27 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/21 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jan 21 06:00:04 2024 John Levine
• 2024/01/19 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Hector Santos
• 2024/01/19 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Seth Blank
• 2024/01/19 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Dotzero
• 2024/01/19 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Todd Herr
• 2024/01/18 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Hector Santos
• 2024/01/18 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Emil Gustafsson
• 2024/01/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Steven M Jones
• 2024/01/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Steven M Jones
• 2024/01/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/01/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/01/17 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/01/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/01/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Douglas Foster
• 2024/01/16 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From John Levine
• 2024/01/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Scott Kitterman
• 2024/01/15 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Damien Alexandre
• 2024/01/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/01/11 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Todd Herr
• 2024/01/11 [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From Damien Alexandre
• 2024/01/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2024/01/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Mark Alley
• 2024/01/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Benny Pedersen
• 2024/01/09 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Alessandro Vesely
• 2024/01/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Scott Kitterman
• 2024/01/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Mark Alley
• 2024/01/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Mark Alley
• 2024/01/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt Todd Herr
• 2024/01/02 [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-29.txt internet-drafts
• 2023/12/13 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis rev 29 Neil Anuskiewicz
• 2023/12/02 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis rev 29 Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/12/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis rev 29 Steven M Jones
• 2023/12/01 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis rev 29 (was: Re: DMARCbis way forward: Do we need our session at IETF 118) Dotzero
• 2023/11/26 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2023/11/26 [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Nov 26 06:00:04 2023 John Levine
• 2023/11/24 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Seth Blank
• 2023/11/24 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Douglas Foster
• 2023/11/24 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Douglas Foster
• 2023/11/24 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/11/23 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Dotzero
• 2023/11/23 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Douglas Foster
• 2023/11/23 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/11/22 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Seth Blank
• 2023/11/22 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Douglas Foster
• 2023/11/22 Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Alessandro Vesely
• 2023/11/21 [dmarc-ietf] DMARC marketing on NPR Jim Fenton
• 2023/11/20 Re: [dmarc-ietf] RFC 9091 vs Tree Walk Seth Blank
• 2023/11/19 [dmarc-ietf] RFC 9091 vs Tree Walk Douglas Foster

• Earlier messages
• Later messages