RE: Restore
-Original Message- From: Amir El Aziq To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 05/10/01 13:03 Subject: Re: Restore Scenario: 5 users in the organisation. 1 server for file/print/email Full Online Exchange backup every night. Exchange BLB every night also. Data backup every night. All backups complete in 3 hours, on 1 tape. Please explain to me why doing a BLB is bad in this scenario. You have reduced the scale of your exchange system to a size where the bad points of BLBs have not yet reared up and bit your mythical scenario admin. That still doesn't make BLBs a good idea, in the same way that one hit of heroin probably won't kill you, but it still might not be a good idea to take some. I could send all of your users a bunch of large emails (say 5 emails of 100mb to all 5 users) and your single-instance-storage-breaking BLB backup isn't quite so elegant anymore. Regards -- Robert Moir, Microsoft Backoffice MVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Imagine how much money could be saved by putting Furbies on front line Helpdesk -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Licensing
-Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2001 15:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Licensing Take it either way. I don't really care, but I'm not going to rely on this list to tell me how my licensing works for my company. nor would i. i might ask for some friendly advice though, and take that into consideration along with what MS and the vendor says. maybe i'm wrong, but your response seems paranoid and unhelfpful. that said, i'm sorry if I've offended you. But that's a natural reaction to previous licence horror stories that we've seen on the list[1] rather than anything personal against you. [1] and of course for the stories to get to the list, some have had personal experience. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Badtrans and SirCam
-Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2001 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Badtrans and SirCam Corporate policies may or may not allow all users to access WindowsUpdate, or if they are using WinNT / 2000 / XP they might not have local admin rights. Not quite as simple as your glib assertion would have it. True but then it's simple incompetence on the part of the network admin, A home user has the excuse of ignorance no matter how poor an excuse you or I may think it is, but a corporate network administrator has no excuse at all, preventing this sort of mess is part of what they are paid for. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Microsoft Passport: Like Security, Only Different -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
-Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 15:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their infinite wisdom decided to make Temporary Internet Files a property of the user (i.e. in their profile) as against just one directory per PC? The case of diskless workstations is a trivial one, so we can ignore that and look for deeper meanings :-) Because users are more likely to visit the pages they were viewing more than once than they are to access pages some other user was viewing, therefore it makes some sense to cache per user. Not to mention cookies, offline viewing of pages in history, and suchlike. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Linux: Like an Operating System. But Different. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-) Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too many problems here with roaming profiles getting too large because of temporary internet files. And some of our students are extremely heavy users of the internet *cough* Don't matter what software you use, if you set it up wrongly. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ORB UK - cross post - long
-Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 16:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ORB UK - cross post - long Note that relays are specifically mentioned in 2821. In the discussion of relaying the bottom line is that a relay is not expected to do much of anything at all, though it _should_ do xyz and _may_ do abc. What he should be testing on is the return of the NDR. Yeah but the blackhole fanatics are much like the sendmail fanatics: Their way is the right way period. If the standard says different that's because the standard is broken. Kinda misses the point somewhat. What happened to being strict about what your server sends out, and liberal about what it can receive? -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Linux: Like an Operating System. But Different. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Setting cache to a small size so it stays fresh and gets purged after just a short length of time works for us. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 16:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... ~ndi Well, I'm happy someone else brought the subject up as I was going to slyly ask if anyone had a means of 'controlling' the amount of cached/temporary internet data so that my roaming profiles didn't take hours to load. I know there is a limit profile size in Profile editor and the setting can be manually adjusted in IE properties but how can I do it en-masse? I would then be able to allow the folder to roam and cure my predicament!! PBB -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue... Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of disk space on servers wasted, for one, excessive network traffic, etc), it's just anoither reason not to use such software :-) Or maybe just to set it up correctly. We don't generally have too many problems here with roaming profiles getting too large because of temporary internet files. And some of our students are extremely heavy users of the internet *cough* Don't matter what software you use, if you set it up wrongly. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Virus Protection
Simply put it is so that if one AV vendors defs let you down, hopefully the others will pick it up. Hear hear! If you are serious about protecting a network you need multiple layers of protection that don't have a single common point of failiure. In addition to the different scan engines on the exchange servers, this is why I like products like mimesweeper so much on the SMTP gateway - in addition to mimesweeper's own ability to plug in virus scanners, it also filters out 95% of the email viruses and worms that hit us by filtering out double extensions (xxx.jpg.vbs and the like) and other similar obvious stuff. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
I'm hoping someone has been able to resolve a similar issue because management is talking about going back to MAPI mode in order to continue bricklevel backups which I am trying to fight against. It's quite amusing that management would rather switch back to a virus scanning method that doesn't always work properly in order to continue with a backup method that doesn't work properly than they would do something to fix either problem properly. I thought that was why they hire us to make these decisions for them. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
Don't give us half the story, tell us what would be better than BLB's and ArcServe... I) Real backups that work. II) NTBackup. Already installed on your NT Server unless you removed it. -- Robert Moir, IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Block attachment
Our management suggested that we should block certain file types by Grouping (eg only Mgr members can receive JPEG and JIF files and all others cannot). Can this be done??? Sure, I know mimesweeper can do this, and if they can, I'm sure any product that competes directly with it can too. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Newsgroups on Exchange? any Alternatives?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Newsgroups on Exchange? any Alternatives? I'm not sure that Exchange supports your definition of newsgroup. If I remember correctly you can do some tricky stuff using Public Folders but don't remember...I believe that Ed Crowley (Did I spell it right? grin) has written some stuff about this? Exchange supports the uses NNTP kind of newsgroup, and its quite possible to write a web interface to such a thing (though I personally believe you'd have to be evil to do such a thing, but that's another story). -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
-Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 19:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suspicious files Hi all, My anti virus just reported a couple of infected files that I don't recognize. WSPFT2TW WSPFT2TV They were both infected and quarantined. They were sitting in \EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ I'm running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. Can anyone shed some light as to if they were system files or attachments or ? Thanks in advance. Uhhh you are running a file based virus scanner against the directories your exchange server uses? If that's the case, for the love of $deity, STOP, right now, I mean THIS MOMENT. AFTER you've done so, read the archives, or the 200 replies you are about to get, that explain why this is a very bad idea. As for what viruses might be coming into your system via your exchange server, its impossible to tell on the information given. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
That's where I'm going wrong. I've always scanned it with my scanner set to delete infected files. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files With the AutoClean option turned on. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files What happens when you scan the priv.edb file? -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suspicious files Hi all, My anti virus just reported a couple of infected files that I don't recognize. WSPFT2TW WSPFT2TV They were both infected and quarantined. They were sitting in \EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ I'm running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. Can anyone shed some light as to if they were system files or attachments or ? Thanks in advance. Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
That, and it settles all arguments about what deleted items retention should be set at. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files But, isn't that how you should keep the size of the IS within reason? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files That's where I'm going wrong. I've always scanned it with my scanner set to delete infected files. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files With the AutoClean option turned on. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files What happens when you scan the priv.edb file? -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suspicious files Hi all, My anti virus just reported a couple of infected files that I don't recognize. WSPFT2TW WSPFT2TV They were both infected and quarantined. They were sitting in \EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ I'm running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. Can anyone shed some light as to if they were system files or attachments or ? Thanks in advance. Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
RE: Suspicious files
-Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files I really hope people don't stumble on this thread and take you guys seriously! :-) I hope so too, because everyone knows you control the size of the IS with RM -r right? No..wait.. Wrong O/S. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
-Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files About how long should that take on a 20 Gig store? Now that it's started,do I have time to run out for dinner? Do it a couple of times and most employers I know would be happy to give you all the time in the world for dinner. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suspicious files
Cold, and wet when it can remember that bit.. But the server I was kicking...er.. Fixing Appears to be stable thank goodness. I am about to retire to the safety of my car and head home! -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files How's luton this evening? I'm down in Hampshire. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files That, and it settles all arguments about what deleted items retention should be set at. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files But, isn't that how you should keep the size of the IS within reason? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files That's where I'm going wrong. I've always scanned it with my scanner set to delete infected files. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 December 2001 20:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files With the AutoClean option turned on. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suspicious files What happens when you scan the priv.edb file? -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suspicious files Hi all, My anti virus just reported a couple of infected files that I don't recognize. WSPFT2TW WSPFT2TV They were both infected and quarantined. They were sitting in \EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ I'm running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4. Can anyone shed some light as to if they were system files or attachments or ? Thanks in advance. Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ
RE: sdkjk
No Problem, we can do that by next Tuesday. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Found.
But are you scanning that folder/directory with the file based NAV scanner? If so, you need to stop scanning the exchange folders with the file based scanner; firstly the file based scanner is not a reliable indicator of whether or not an email message being processed is infected, and secondly if it decides to disinfect, quarantine, or delete an alleged infected message, you will lose mail. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 December 2001 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Virus Found. I have NAV for Exchange and NAV for server running this server. - Original Message - From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:42 AM Subject: RE: Virus Found. Are you using a file based virus scanner on your exchange server? Please say NO! -- Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Found. I found a virus in this directory: D:\EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\ Can someone tell me what the fucntion of this directory is? Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT6.0 SP6a Thanks! _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
Finger licking good -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 January 2002 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor If everything taste like chicken, what does chicken taste like? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Tastes just like chicken when you cook them correctly...err...from what I hear. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor I prefer frozen squirrels for catapult ammo. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Here we use broken monitors for catapult ammo. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: fix monitor I used to have them fixed by an outfit for my customers. The firm was in Texas. Start up north and start driving south. They are somewhere in between. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:52 PM Subject: RE: fix monitor I was going to tell him to draw a bath first. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Keep your hands out. The voltage is real high in there. It usually costs more to fix, than to replace. What kind of monitor is it? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: fix monitor for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a good place on the web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected
RE: recover from crash
-Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 January 2002 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover from crash Scenario: You come in one morning, reboot the exchange server, and it never comes back up, blue screens or whatever. It crashes. Question: What do you do FIRST to try to bring it back up? What do you do Second if that doesn't work? At what point do you go for the recovery server, and your backup tape? I was looking through the disaster recovery paper and its great...but I didn't see what to do before the backup server plan. It has tons of switches and command line tools, but im looking for elementary type notes When it crashes, try ERD first and run repair, if that doesn't work try... Stuff like that. IF the server boots, I found lots of info on error messages and the likes to try to get the IS started etc..but nothing if its basically dead. I know, this is something I should have learned long ago, but point me to the site, or papers where I can get this and I can move past this embarrassment! There is no magic one shot always do this answer to this I'm afraid. If it's a software error, I'd start with the microsoft technet CDs and website for example, and follow their troubleshooting guide for whatever the error is that you are getting. If you crashed after recently installing a new application, contact the vendor for that as well. If it's a hardware fault, do likewise with whatever troubleshooting stuff your hardware vendor has supplied. The time to start thinking about disaster recovery and restores and so on, imho, is when you are clear that you are not going to get a fix or when it is clear that the fix is going to take longer to appear and work than your users are willing to wait, which again is something specific to your user using the affected server and their needs. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
I'd start with duct tape and lots of it. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 14:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Some Problem Someplace, I think hi list.. i have a problem with either the server or the client.. how do i fix it..? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
-Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 14:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think no.. I believe duct tape has been replaced with liquid nail (you can get it into smaller places) but the 'lots of it' part still applies. Oui but I am old fashioned. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
-Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. You could unsubscribe and reduce the number by one. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
-Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2002 11:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Anyone ever wondered what Ed Crowley looks like? A curmudgeon, I assumed. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Msg truncated
More than one sender in the FROM section, perhaps? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Msg truncated Anyone know why this message failed it was done through a website which we dont host and they use coldfusion database. undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from smtp.mgn.com [65.209.124.212] by columbus.mgn.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.00) id AD8C1007C; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:52:28 -0500 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-type: text/html Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:52:16 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ICEC / MID-SHIP FREIGHT RFQ Verification Message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] html body bpreThis e-mail message serves to confirm that your freight inquiry has been submitted to Midship as follows:/pre/b br tabletrtd table border=1 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=2 bordercolor=silver trtrtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteTrader:/font/p/b/tdtdLem Kinnick/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteQuantity:/font/p/b/tdtd15,000 +/- 10%/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteCommodity:/font/p/b/tdtdTSP/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteLoad Port:/font/p/b/tdtdCoatzacalcous/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteLoad Terms:/font/p/b/tdtd4500 MT PWWD SHINC/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDischarge Port:/font/p/b/tdtdNew Orleans/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDischarge Terms:/font/p/b/tdtd10,000 MT PWWD SHINC/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDates:/font/p/b/tdtdJanuary-February 2002/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteStatus:/font/p/b/tdtdfont color=redAwaiting Freight Estimate/font/td/tr /table /td tdnbsp;/td td valign=bottom align=left a href=http://icec.midship.com/; img src=http://www.midship.com/images/modflag3.gif; width=100 height=145 alt= border=0/ [message truncated] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Msg truncated
Well most systems I know tend to LART you with an error message if you try and send FROM more than one address. If they can make that go away and test again, perhaps you might get lucky? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Msg truncated could be not sure though Im not to familiar with website email -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Msg truncated More than one sender in the FROM section, perhaps? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Msg truncated Anyone know why this message failed it was done through a website which we dont host and they use coldfusion database. undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original message follows. Received: from smtp.mgn.com [65.209.124.212] by columbus.mgn.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.00) id AD8C1007C; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:52:28 -0500 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-type: text/html Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:52:16 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ICEC / MID-SHIP FREIGHT RFQ Verification Message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] html body bpreThis e-mail message serves to confirm that your freight inquiry has been submitted to Midship as follows:/pre/b br tabletrtd table border=1 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=2 bordercolor=silver trtrtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteTrader:/font/p/b/tdtdLem Kinnick/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteQuantity:/font/p/b/tdtd15,000 +/- 10%/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteCommodity:/font/p/b/tdtdTSP/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteLoad Port:/font/p/b/tdtdCoatzacalcous/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteLoad Terms:/font/p/b/tdtd4500 MT PWWD SHINC/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDischarge Port:/font/p/b/tdtdNew Orleans/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDischarge Terms:/font/p/b/tdtd10,000 MT PWWD SHINC/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteDates:/font/p/b/tdtdJanuary-February 2002/td/tr trtd align=right bgcolor=navybp align=rightfont color=whiteStatus:/font/p/b/tdtdfont color=redAwaiting Freight Estimate/font/td/tr /table /td tdnbsp;/td td valign=bottom align=left a href=http://icec.midship.com/; img src=http://www.midship.com/images/modflag3.gif; width=100 height=145 alt= border=0/ [message truncated] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications)
-Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 17:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 over WAN connection (new mail notifications) WOW! I have NEVER seen that statement made before on this list, that's scary. Is the sky still blue? He forgot the sarcasm tags. And also to add that the list's own elite squad of marines has been dispatched to the poster's work address to tattoo I *WILL ALWAYS* spend at least some time reading archives and maybe trying google, technet, asking around the office before posting. Especially given that the poster mentioned the beast that is causing his problem in the post itself. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Different kind of spam fighter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 19:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Different kind of spam fighter Somewhere in the back of my brain, I remember seeing a tool that you could run on received spam that would simulate a NDR back to the sender, pretending that the email address was invalid. Does anyone know of such a tool and how effective it might or might not be? Well I use the MAPS RBL for that but that's probably not the kind of tool you were talking about. Works ok though. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
And another comment Mr. Ely. Let's keep this in mind next time you decide to flame me or someone else on the list. I'm simply giving my opinion. Acceptance is optional. I'm giving my opinion of a server spec for exchange server that in my opinion has giving me the best level of performance and least amount of headaches over a 10 year period. Whether you choose this type of hardware is irrelevant being that I'm the one stating an opinion. But wasn't Don merely stating *his* opinion? Or is it only ok for you to have one? You know, when you have one opinion, and the majority of a large list, like ohh this one, have another opinion, then you might consider it time to re-evaluate your opinion. Someone else actually stated their server load and you basically told them they were wrong. That is going beyond stating an opinion, each person here probably knows best of all what is running on their own servers. I've got one here with only 1 gig of ram and 2500 users. According to you, that's impossible, but you are free to come visit this site and count them and still see if you feel that way. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
-Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization and this from a non-profit organization.. wow. Well if they don't have profits, they have to waste all that money on something else I guess! -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new to exchange having some problems!!!
*plonk* OK own up, who cross linked the list to alt.trolls.pathetic? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 07:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! well Ed thanks for your patients...I'm not an exchange person and I'm trying to do someone a favor, And I never asked you to be drug into this. Exchange is not my specialty and I have picked myself up a few books but when time is kind of important reading an entire book isn't always your answer! Especially when I'm trying to finish up other certs! I give credit to the 2 ladies that pointed me in the right direction or at least a directionI guess since you have a prick you feel that you should be a prick!!! I got on this little discussion forum to see if an expert out there could help someone new to the game, in a timely fashion!!! So you can get yourself out of this little conversation and go back to your internet porn or what ever you need to get by in your miserable little world!!! Spring for a hooker it may help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! If you have nothing wrong, you don't need to troubleshoot. The reason you aren't getting any help is that you aren't stating your problem. You're asking What does this mean? Well, nobody really feels like translating random error messaages. Sit down, think a while, compose your problem in clear text and then after you are sure what you've composed describes your problem then, and only then, hit the Send button. I've read through all the threads between you and those trying to help you and I do not plan to be dragged into that. While you're waiting for answers, buy Paul Robichaux's and Tony Redmond's Exchange 5.5 books (spring for the overnight shipping) and read them. You need a foundation of knowledge and you aren't going to get that quickly from this list. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! that's my problem I'm trying to figure out what I should be doing?? At the end of that article it gives 2 trouble shooting tips configuring 2 objects and removing a check on the targetaddress attribute I'm not how to do either of those -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! I read that. That isn't your problem. That is a symptom. You didn't explain what you are trying to do. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: new to exchange having some problems!!! Sorry Ed. I'm new to exchange and was having some problems. I think a couple people from an earlier discussion helped me out. But Here is my problem. I have a client that set up a small business server running exchange 5.5. Periodically people that are sending them e-mails will receive a NDR that says: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 This is happening to about 3 out of 5 people in the company I found this article but I'm not sure how to do the steps in the touble shooting section. So some people where trying to explain them to me. Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in
RE: You sent a message with obscene wording
Sheesh and I thought I had our mimesweeper bad words filter dialed up high. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Postmaster Subject: RE: You sent a message with obscene wording I got the same thing. ~!Mike -Original Message- From: MAILsweeper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 1/15/2002 9:26 AM To: Mike Carlson Cc: Postmaster Subject: You sent a message with obscene wording OBSCENE MESSAGE FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] ON 15-Jan-2002 15:29:23.00 RE RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password. TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Your message entitled RE: Oh crap. Need to change service account password. has been blocked due to obscene or offensive wording. The message was originally sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This message has been saved for review Continued abuse of the system may result in action being taken For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- body.txt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: primary/secondary mx
On your DNS server, in the MX record itself. -Original Message- From: Dean Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 16:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: primary/secondary mx thanks! - um without meaning to sound stupid, where do I set the MX preference number?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: 15 January 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: primary/secondary mx Even though this is off topic, its fairly easy. Leave sendmail running on the Linux box (but remove any alias file entries that you might have used for local delivery), and make sure that it has an MX record with a higher preference number (lowest number is always tried first). Viola. As long as there is a higher preference (ie lower number) MX record, sendmail will queue and forward for that domain. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Dean Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: primary/secondary mx I am new to exchange and have just set up my first exchange server and migrated all services from a linux sendmail server hosted externally. It all works fine, but I have been asked to make the linux server a fallover or secondary mx as our exchange server is running on an ADSL that is a bit temperemental. If the ADSL goes down I would like the old mail server to pick up and deliver the mail. I have no idea on how to do this. Could anybody help?? Dean Clark Database Administrator Calaba Ltd (+44) 0207 258 8462 07790 853 688 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
-Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature
-Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for an Outlook/Exchange feature Sorry, it can be more clear: I thought Lori's reply was pretty clear. so that the mail sender within the same organization can set-up the property in the outgoing e-mail such that the recipient can not delete the mail (or mark as read) until he fulfills the sender's attributes . Can't see a way this can be done without some 3rd party stuff I've not heard of, and even then I doubt it. Scenario: you implement a magic utility to do this on the server. User comes along, downloads mail to a PST, or via POP to Outlook Express on their home machine while they are working from home one day. They then disconnect from the server to read their email locally at their leisure. How could anything possibly control what happens to the mail objects in this scenario? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup
-Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 17:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 AV Roundup norton wins? are they mad? Of course the reporters are not mad! Norton/Symantec have a very large advertising and journalist schmoozing budget. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
-Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 19:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. I checked my dictionary and I didn't find takes backups before screwing with system under paranoid. I did find it under clueful admin though. I can't help feeling that at least 40% of support calls/discussions on places like this would go away if more people did that. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
-Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange My immediate supervisor mentioned that when we finally get new Exchange Servers that we should have them clustered. Nope you shouldn't. Now I have never clustered servers before and wouldn't know how to start, but I just wanted to get everyone's opinions on the subject to begin with. How hard is it to do, and how is it to maintain. What are the pro's and con's. Any help would be appreciated. The cons are it's a sod to set up, and gains you very little additional functionality or reliability or disaster recovery abilities. The Pros are umm..ah... That you'll know how to setup a cluster after doing it, and it looks good on your resume to people who don't know what a bad idea it is to cluster exchange. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook session sharing disable
-Original Message- From: Rogerio Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook session sharing disable It is easy to develop some sort of trojan, that once installed and running at a particular machine, can use an active connection from the user's Outlook to the Exchange Server, to have free access to the user's mailbox. So, any form of strong authentication that could be used to enforce the security of access to the Exchange Server is useless, because an authenticated Outlook-Exchange session can be largely used by whatever process running on that machine. Ok. I'm logged on at my machine and I'm stupid enough to run click here to see britney spears naked, really, not a virus honest.exe.jpg.pif.htm.bat.com It uses your elite security hole to send lots of emails via notepad. It sends email via the VBA scripting interface It installs it's own SMTP engine (like Happy99/SKA did) and sends it's damn email it's damn self. What's the difference? What's the point? -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 through MS Exchange 5.5 Server
-Original Message- From: Cezar Haraga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 January 2002 11:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 through MS Exchange 5.5 Server Thank you Ed, I understand. But, please, give me an idea...: 1. install another software for this or... 2. leave this problem...change server or else... I'm not Ed, but I'll take a swing at this. Cezar, You want the server to collect mail from an upstream server using POP3, as I understand it. This quite simply will not work properly. There will always be cases where mail can be lost or misdirected, or can generally behave in a manner you do not expect. There are solutions for doing this out there if you do a search, but all the ones I have seen will tell you in the first or second paragraph of the read-me file that this is a bodge, a kludge, and it does not and will not work 100% correctly. I can't see any reason where this might be a good idea, given the unreliability, because it's always going to be better to either get everyone their own pop3 account on the upstream ISP server, or to pay for a proper connection. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: average lifespan server
-Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 10:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server how do you deal with your accounting department? They can't grasp it that a machine is worthless as a server after three years... They don't? As much as I hate our whiny beancounters, they are actually pretty good here at understanding computers depreciate in value to the point of probably needing replacement after 3 years. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: average lifespan server
-Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 13:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server Kim, A server is only worthless after 3 years if the load on it has outgrown it's capacity, or it's becoming difficult to maintain the hardware. We have several machines around 5 years old, happily running along doing their jobs. One of my mottos is 'if it ain't broke don't fix (or replace) it'. I'd agree with that, and we've put it into practice here, but with the speed the hardware market is moving now, 3 years is almost certainly enough time for any replacement hardware to have disappeared off the shelves and become difficult to source. If it's important enough to be on a decent server platform in the first place, its probably important enough that you can't afford it to be offline two weeks because no one makes power supply fans that shape any more. That's not to say that you should automatically scrap stuff after that time, but rather, that you just need to keep an eye on the situation for maintenance on systems like that. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article
M Half-point -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article I'm surprised that no one who read the aricle ha said mm Honey-pot Would have been worth another half-point imho -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article That was a good comeback and was easy to read. I give it a 90. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article If you're going to make fun of AB, you at least ought to get it right. It had a good beat and was easy to dance to. I give it an 85. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article It had a good beat. I give it an 8. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Yeah, but it says the bug is fixed with a patch from Trend. I assume everybody will be keeping their AV products up-to-date. Still good article. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article good article, but it appears to only affect Office Scan...I wonder if Scan Mail has the same vulnerabilities? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: If your using Trend Mico A\V - Look at this article Hi there If you're using Trend Micro, take a look at this article. Thanks Russell http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-819807.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not
RE: LDAP access
Just ldap://[server] No need to specify port IIRC, if your ldap server is on the default port (which I think is indeed 389). -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2002 12:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP access ex 5.5sp4 NTsp6 I know this was discussed recently but I am having a mental block. In order for me to get LDAP access to my exserver from home, I just simply type in: 'ldap://external ip-address of server' in a browser and hit return yes? Or do I have to put port 389 in there somewhere as well? I have LDAP enabled on my protocol tab. Thanks Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Issue Warning Limit on Public Folders
-Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 13:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Issue Warning Limit on Public Folders No-no-no-no, no-no there's no limit... Arrgh now I got that damn song rattling around my head (yeah I know, its lonely, plenty of space for it, etc etc) THANK YOU VERY MUCH! *bangs head on desk* -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and NAS
Putting exchange on NAS seems to be like making a bear dance. Sure it can be done, but everyone is happier in the long run if you just don't bother. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 07:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange and NAS http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314916 Now .. that doesn't convince me to combine Exchange and NAS. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Haber, David J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:49 PM Subject: Exchange and NAS Looks like Microsoft is finally supporting Exchange 5.5 and 2000 on network attached storage devices. See Q317172 and Q317173. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro
Does it work if you install in the order indicated below, instead of the other way round? TS is probably a better bet anyway. I have to admit, I quite like it as an admin tool precisely because I don't have to play around installing various admin tools on a workstation before I can use it. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro Thanks again but I originally installed the Win2k tools after I installed the .NET ones and they did not behave well together. I have since reinstalled the OS and was hoping to avoid that fun again. I guess TS it is. Oh Joy... Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro David, I have installed the ESM on XP. You must first install the Win2K administration tools. Just ignore the error that states they can't be installed. Once they are installed, you can then install ESM. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange admin tools on XP Pro According to Q312139 titled You Cannot Install Exchange System Manager on a Windows XP-Based Computer, MS tells you that you basically have to run Exchange tools on a different machine if you have an XP workstation. I was able to install the old 5.5 admin with no troubles but whenever I try to install E2k admin tools (we only purchased the E2k upgrade if that matters) I get the exact message mentioned in that article and it won't let me. Also, according to Q284224 you will not see the Exchange-related tasks in Active Directory Users Computers until you install the ESM. Herein lies my problem. If you can't add the ESM to an XP machine and you can't utilize Exchange tasks unless you install the ESM, you basically cannot use an XP workstation to administer Exchange? Lastly, I'm assuming that the Active Directory Connector MMC also falls under this same thought process? Any input would be appreciated. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange protection You comments please !
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange protection You comments please ! One good point is the multiple engines... better chances in outbreaks. Trend only has their own engine, if their site gets swamped and you can't download the engine, where are you going to be? Not just that, though it is an important point. Some virus scanners consistently do better at one kind of scenario/virus type compared to other scanners, so this also supports the multiple scan engines idea. Hopefully you can pick two scanners whose relative strong and weak areas compliment each other. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: relay config
Who are these people in relation to your site? Are you sure this isn't, for example, failed attempts at unauthorised relaying via your system (in which case the error shows your anti relay precautions are working). -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 08:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: relay config Now I start getting these messages... How can I get rid of those without having to have open relay? Kim The following recipient(s) could not be reached: amudelta coordinator on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: relay config
And how does he connect to the network. Can he send to other addresses? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Hi Robert, it's a mail that our finance manager wanted to send to these people, and he almost immediately got this message back... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Who are these people in relation to your site? Are you sure this isn't, for example, failed attempts at unauthorised relaying via your system (in which case the error shows your anti relay precautions are working). -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 08:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: relay config Now I start getting these messages... How can I get rid of those without having to have open relay? Kim The following recipient(s) could not be reached: amudelta coordinator on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: relay config
Including external? Could he, for example, mail me. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config he's on the LAN, he can send ok to most of his addressees... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config And how does he connect to the network. Can he send to other addresses? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Hi Robert, it's a mail that our finance manager wanted to send to these people, and he almost immediately got this message back... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Who are these people in relation to your site? Are you sure this isn't, for example, failed attempts at unauthorised relaying via your system (in which case the error shows your anti relay precautions are working). -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 08:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: relay config Now I start getting these messages... How can I get rid of those without having to have open relay? Kim The following recipient(s) could not be reached: amudelta coordinator on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 19/02/02 08:34 You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=BE/DC=INTAS:MAILSERVER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information
RE: Problem in sending Encryption enabled Mail
-Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem in sending Encryption enabled Mail We are using Exchange 5.5 server with SP4 on Winnt 4.0 with Sp6 client as Outlook 2000. the watson error comes only when i am choosing the users who are all not enabled for encryption in the KM Server. Sometimes it is pointing me a error this user encryption is not enabled, do you want it send it without encryption 90 % of time it is pointing me the watson error only. As a administrator i know who are all the users enabled for encryption, so i am sending encryption as per the user, but the problem is when users trying to use this option of encryption ( they don't know who are all enabled.) I'm still not 100% sure I understand you (any details of the Dr Watson error) but the following Technet articles may be of help? Or maybe someone with more experience of this sort of thing can step in. OL97: Error Message Occurs When You Send an Encrypted Message [Q283206] OL2000: (CW) Error Message Occurs You Send an Encrypted Message [Q282959] OL2000: Outlook 2000 Users Cannot Send Encrypted Mail [Q287094] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CPU Stress Test
If that don't cut it, try loading netscape navigator 6 and launching the JVM. That should stress most machines. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 15:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CPU Stress Test loadsim -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CPU Stress Test Anybody know of a free program to stress out my server for a few hours? I need to test this thing before I throw exch2k on it. It has been a little buggy before. Dell PowerEdge 4400. Thanks. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
Who wins, you or Claire? -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware And get paid for it. Result! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Overtime? You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or whatever. An hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog for a walk. Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for awhile. Select the next block, and it's dinnertime. -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly move between servers. So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day. And if I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup restore method which is quicker, and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky. Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore. -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky. Tris - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive. That does not give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time. Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of minutes. -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Over 500. Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here? -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within one day. I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if they are big. As a result, recently I used the server move method, and had great
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
Of Course! -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 11:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware manly voice Me, of course /manly voice - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 11:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Who wins, you or Claire? -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware And get paid for it. Result! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Overtime? You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or whatever. An hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog for a walk. Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for awhile. Select the next block, and it's dinnertime. -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly move between servers. So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day. And if I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup restore method which is quicker, and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky. Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore. -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky. Tris - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive. That does not give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time. Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of minutes. -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Over 500. Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here
RE: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
-Original Message- From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 April 2002 16:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000 Hello all, We are considering ScanMail for spam management. We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment filtering. My question is: do we need the entire ScanMail package? or just the eManager plug-in? or is there a dependency there? Getting rid of GroupShield is an option, but I don't want to spend the money if I do not have to. From being on this list for a couple of years I recall that the general consensus is that Trend's products are well received by Exchange admins, however if there are any other viable alternatives, I'd like to hear them too. We currently use mimesweeper for content - including spam - filtering. It allows us to use realtime blackhole lists (RBLs) such as MAPS, and also to define filters for spam and anything else mangement consider unacceptable this week. As such I'd recommend it, with the following caveat: All spam filters I've seen are flawed; they might suck in different ways but they do all suck. In our use of Mimesweeper I can say that it sucks less than many other systems I've seen and used. Anyone who tells you they have a 100% perfect system for filtering email is either on crack or doesn't know what they are talking about. No matter what spam filter you install be prepared to either lose legitmate email, because your filters are too strict, or to let spam through because they are too lax, or to have someone review mail that's on hold to decide whether it's spam or not (and that's a whole can of worms by itself). I'd strongly suggest this has to be supported by senior management, if not driven entirely by them, because if not your butt will be on the chopping block when one of them loses an email order for $10 million because it had make money fast in the subject line. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College He's not the messiah, He's a very naughty boy -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
-Original Message- From: Volkan Günaydin (ATM/Network Grp. Bsk. Sistem Mühendisi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 05:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server This is the most powerful solution :-) THANKS FOR ALL. I have asked this question, and nobody presented a technical solution here, what a pity!!! I have found a solution, Group Policy Object (adding outlook.adm template and deploying to the domain controller (ntconfig.pol), erase the BCC button), ha? You are, of course, 100% certain that someone wouldn't just copy/paste contents of a mail into a new message and send it to the person they would otherwise have BCC'd (or doesn't the manager care about this as long as they don't actually use the BCC field). -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Batmobile from the old TV show. Only car for you. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 14:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6 Im looking for a dependable car. Any thoughts? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:19:10 +0200 From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, problem with IE in 5.5 as well as 6, when I click on a link and it has to open in a new window, it doesn't react in that window... any ideas? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Clue. You've either got it, or you think all your helpdesk staff need to log into everyone's account every time theres an email trouble ticket. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students
RE: Setting up Exchange
-Original Message- From: Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 April 2002 23:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting up Exchange Can anyone suggest a good site where I can download some good info on how to set up an inhouse mail server - from a to z using MSExchange Server 5.5? So tell me, how did you manage to find this mailing list and post without reading any of the links included in each post or on the website you probably joined from. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
Quite, Relying on a notebook instead of one's memory doesn't make you a bad administrator or a bad network architect or a bad PHB or whatever. It helps makes you a good one. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 April 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Absolutely no sarcasm in that message at all. Maybe some exasperation. For the record, I have a notebook right here and I keep the majority of my knowledgebase online.. Heck I even created a website to keep track of all the tools and utilities I know about since it seemed the most logical way to structure it. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Does the S in SWYNK stand for sarcasm ? :-) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 April 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Buy a $0.99 notebook and write down things you learn. [1] Are the users aliases unique and unambiguous? Have you tried any of the troubleshooting steps related to this error message described in TechNet? If, so.. Which ones and what was the result? What version of Exchange are you running? What service pack and OS? Asking a properly phrased technical question[2] will get you[3] much better answers. [1] Or invest in a help desk solution with a knowledgebase utility. [2] Appendix D of the Exchange FAQ. [3] The collective you. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Hello, I created two new users and both cannot access their mailbox on OWA. When I try to log in with their correct info I get unable to get you inbox. Everyone elses works in my company it just doesnt work for the two new profiles that i set up. I have had this problem in the past but forgot how to fix it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
PINK, Nathaniel has the CA virus. The CA virus decided to share the news with us all. The symptoms are dumb email messages, an inability to restore backups, and blue screens of death. Pity poor PINK, Nathaniel. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I got several of those, but I'm quite convinced I didn't distribute any of the mentionned files... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus. The file is currently Cleaned. The message, RE: SMTP message size limits, was sent from Christopher Hummert and was discovered in PINK, Nathaniel\Inbox located at FPM Netops/FPMMAIL/PELLIG. -End of Original Message- Now I've checked around and I've failed to find any information about this virus, furthermore even with our most recent updates to Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition it didn't find anything either. Does anyone thing this is something I should worry about or does anyone know what this virus is? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving NT4.0 Secondary Dns Server to Win2k Server before upgr adi ng to Win2k....
Am I missing something? Just goto your primary DNS server and nominate the new W2K DNS server as a new secondary. Once you are happy remove the old (nt4) one. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving NT4.0 Secondary Dns Server to Win2k Server before upgradi ng to Win2k Sorry the previous Subject line was in error In doing my research on how to do this I've come across two methods this and having tested one method I was wondering if there are other methods? The method I tested was a combination of Mark Minasi Dns Disaster Recovery that he published in the Windows NT Magazine Dated November 2000 and an article I came across in Windows 2000 Magazine Web Site(December 1999 called DNS Migration by Alex Wun)where the person copied the DNS files to the \system root\system32\dns of the old server to the new server and added a dummy zone to the new server then export the dns zone entry from the old server and imported to the new server. The other method that I came across is install dns on a 2k server set the old nt4.0 box to update the new 2k server, then in win2k add the zone with the wizard then under domain name\properties\general\accept dynamic updates = yes... john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS
-Original Message- From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 19:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS Correct me if I'm wrong, Ok XADM: Installing Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 Causes Error Msg. [Q248726] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS
XADM: Error Message: You Must Be Logged Into an NT Domain to... [Q251177] ??? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Installing Exchange Server through TS This computer must be a member of a domain to install I am not logged in as the local account I am logged in as a domain admin I could swear I had this exact same problem with my last install and I had to modify a registry key to add the domain name before it would install over an admin TS connection - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS You don't need to modify any registry key to do it. What is the exact error you're getting? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing Exchange Server through TS Does anyone recall the registry key you have to modify to allow you to install Exchange Server 5.5 while logged in though a windows 2000 Terminal Session (admin mode)? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple mailboxes
-Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 April 2002 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple mailboxes Hi all, I have a question concerning mailboxes in Exchange 2000. At our company we have two Exchange 2000 Servers. Both are in different location. A user has one account on each location. So you have two different users account and two different e-mail address. These accounts are on two different servers in the same domain. Let say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] The accounts should be configured in such a way that when he logs on with any account, he should be able to read all mail in one mailbox. So the mailboxes should be identical. Also it must be configured that when he sends an email using any of these accounts, the reply address must be [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have tried lots of things, but none gave me the result I want. Anybody have a suggestion??? You could try explaining why they have duplicate accounts but only want it to look like one, when to all intents and purposes the problem would be solved by just having one account. Either threes something we don't know about the design of this network, or something the designer of the network don't know about the design of the network and articulating why they have two accounts but it's so important they appear to only have one would help clear a lot of the problem up I think. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
-Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 00:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Nope. Haven't taken a single test. Call me lazy. aol me too /aol I've taken a fair few tests and wouldn't mind finishing off the w2k MCSE someday but generally I'm far too busy actually doing the stuff to sit around taking tests about it. My reluctance to take tests when I could be doing productive work instead hasn't really hurt my career - whenever I've decided I really wanted a particular job I've always got as far as interviewing for it. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
-Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. It's about as fair as hiring or not based on the 4 little letters M, C, S E. (or CCIP or whatever) Those who can, do, and might get the 4 little letters if they have time. Those who can't, get the 4 little letters via braindumps or boot camps and expect to be hired on the strength of knowing what DHCP stands for even tho they never installed it on a production server. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley
Why not join a list he does post to and ask him for clarification? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 20:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley why can he not post here? How would list mismanagement cause that? Sounds vaugue to me -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Evans Sent: May 2, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley He posts on the Yahoo Group called Exchange 2000 daily. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley Our loss. Thats for dang sure. Its not the same w/o him. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: totally OT:Ed Crowley He's alive and well. Swynk's mismanagement of this list has made it impossible for him to post as of late. - Original Message - From: Chinnery Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: totally OT:Ed Crowley Does anybody know what happened to Ed Crowley? It just hit me that I haven't seen any posts from him for a long time. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. And Outlook 2002 SP1 too? - I think that's where the issue was fixed; IIRC it's a client issue not a server one. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
-Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
-Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! Not on a first date I don't -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. Why not just answer the freaking question as well, which he actually did. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
-Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Doesn't that affect your typing? ;-) -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Well then we're talking about stopping people who are making an effort to break into her email, rather than those who are casually glancing around while sitting in front of a computer - which is human nature - and seeing things they shouldn't. And I understood we were talking about casual viewing rather than determined twiddling of settings to break into someone's email. If we're talking about deliberate attempts to look at other people's mail that's a whole different kettle of cod, and in that case they've got serious problems regardless of what happens with outlook because people sharing logins anyway by the sounds of things. -Original Message- From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Then anyone can go in and change it back. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Set her authentication type to None instead of Password. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
-Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Sorry, I didn't make myself clear This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it Then consider the solution Gary and I suggested. It will stop people casually viewing her email. If that's not robust enough for you, then you've got big problems because its not easy to secure stuff on the one hand and let everyone use her account on the other. One either secures stuff 100% properly or one leaves holes someone malicious could drive a truck through. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Klez in attached html
-Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 09:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Klez in attached html I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of this virus, but we have one user who is being sent an html file As soon as the email is clicked on, the attachment is attempted to be opened by Outlook. Then Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp internet folder with Klez, and it is the same filename as the html attachment, but the html has changed to exe For instance, today he has an email with revisions1.html attached. When he selects the email, it attempts to open the attachment, and Officescan quarantines the file revisions1.exe from the temp internet folder. I thought that Klez attachments had double extensions, like revisions1.html.exe Why wouldn't scanmail be stopping this file? I havent in the past considered that we should be blocking htm and html, but should we? I've checked this PC with Officescan and Symantecs tool, and it shows no traces of Klez http://www.fsecure.com/v-descs/klez.shtml - I'd say you need to do some patching on the system in question and others like it. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Klez in attached html
-Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Klez in attached html You don't need to block HTM and HTML files, but you do need to be doing some basics. Personally I would use the full list in appendix J. You know the longer I spend dealing with users and managing mail servers the more I begin to feel that blocking attachments based on the *.* filter, and allowing plain text messages is the only way to go. Cuts down on support questions no end... -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client problem
-Original Message- From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 08:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange client problem Is urgent, please help me. I have following problem: The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list. Ok, its urgent. I understand that but can you slow down and give us a bit more info. Does this happen to all users? Did it ever work? Has something changed anywhere on your network? What client version? Can you get in using, for example, OWA? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
-Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 19:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? It's a special device that allows any user to corrupt your exchange information store without leaving their chair.. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
-Original Message- From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 June 2002 01:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Theres nothing there that indicates the process failing. It will use more space as it needs it, up to its top limit, and will release space on request, and then will grab it back as it needs it again. So fluctuations are not unusual. If it was going up and down like a lunatic all the time that might be a bit interesting but steady changes upwards with dips back down here and there are not unusual. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
-Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. I think we're back to closing our eyes and wishing really hard again. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
-Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help in Deciphering . . .
Well the code to say the server can't find an account at all is a permanent error, a 5.x.x code. 5.1.1. according to my (faulty) memory and the kb article below. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204 Numerical Code: 4.4.7 Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed before the message expiration time occurred. This message can also indicate that a message header limit has been reached on a remote server or some other protocol timeout occurred while communicating with the remote server. Troubleshooting: This message usually indicates an issue on the receiving server. Check the validity of the recipient address, and determine if the receiving server is configured to receive messages correctly. It may be necessary to reduce the number of recipients in the header of the message for the host to which you are receiving this error. If you resend the message, it is placed in the queue again. If the receiving server is up, the message is delivered. Who won the bet? Paul -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help in Deciphering . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help in Deciphering . . . Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;) Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: delayed Status: 4.4.7 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:45:07 -0500 Server can't hand off. It's a 'temporary' error telling you it can't deliver the message to the server. If it could contact the server and exchange messages with it, but the receiving server couldn't find the mailbox in the address you'd see something different. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Guidance for Upgrade of Small Network to W2K/E2K
-Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 June 2002 06:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Guidance for Upgrade of Small Network to W2K/E2K I hope you guys feel better. It must be nice to know everything, and be ready to jump on anyone who asks for help. I guess that makes you feel really big. Keep in mind you were apparently asking people to do your work for you. Maybe that wasn't your intention but that's how it looked. Perhaps you could tell us *why* you ain't entirely happy with the proposals you've read so far, and maybe you'll get a bit more help. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College And where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns. Don't bother, they're here. - apparently a song as well as what you say when you see an ArcServe salesman. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders delivering mail?!
Mmmm nachos. Can I get some beer in here? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 June 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?! Nacho's are in trouble? I better go buy some! -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public folders delivering mail?! I think natco is in trouble. - Original Message - From: matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?! Is this done via the outlook client or at the 5.5 server. The issue being I have users who have folders close to their email address. If sender misspells email address Mail goes directly to folder. User complains she is missing email. She wants all mail to come to inbox then after read she will move to whatever public folder she wants. -Original Message- From: Drewery, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders delivering mail?! You can remove the SMTP address from the public folder. Ant. -- Anthony Drewery MCSE Messaging Services CP Ships, Crawley, UK -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 June 2002 16:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folders delivering mail?! Hi quick question Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT 4.0 sp6. If I set up a public folder and then email to to this folder it accepts the email. IE.. I have a mailbox setup for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I made a public folder called johnsmith. I can email the folder by [EMAIL PROTECTED] And it gets delivered to this folder. How can I stop this from happening? This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication represents the originator's personal views and opinions, which do not necessarily reflect those of Canada Maritime. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forward, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify the Canmar/Cast Help Desk on +44 (0) 1293 582 800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outbound Failures
-Original Message- From: Phil Steele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 June 2002 09:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outbound Failures I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on a W2K server SP1. Since installing SP4, it appears (could be coincidence)that I now regularly get notification of Outbound Mail Failures. The message states that the mail could not be sent because the 'host is unknown'. I am assuming that if I had any problems with DNS then no mail would get delivered. The Internet connection is working perfectly. Any help would be really appreciated Silly question perhaps but lets start with the simple stuff: Have you sat down at the server and tried pinging or traceroute to server addresses mentioned as problematic in your NDRs? Have you tried contacting any that you can't reach from your server console from somewhere else? Is it sending to the same two or three servers that generates NDRs or is it totally random? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Our doubts are traitors -William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL
-Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 July 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CLEVER SPAM EMAIL Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail from a telnet session (to duplicate what's being done in the RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits will last much longer. I don't see how anyone could call themselves an email system administrator if they can't do this. It scares me that I might be exposing my poor email servers to people who think this is new news... -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free\busy
You'll wear it out fast that way! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 July 2002 15:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free\busy Mine goes to 11. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free\busy Change it to 3. -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free\busy personalmail It's July 29th. If I create a meeting request for September 4th, shouldn't the free\busy information for my required attendees be available? I know by default 2 months are published when Free/Busy is established. But, September 4th is not 2 months away. So, why do I get hashed lines for that date? Can anyone provide some insight into this? Microsoft's Knowledge Base didn't really help me. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: server access
Remember that port 25 is for sending and receiving mail between servers. The question is whether or not they can connect to either pop3 or IMAP for client to server communications. This depends on whether or not you've enabled these protocols on the server, and also, obviously, if they are filtered by a firewall or proxy at any point between the two of you. -Original Message- From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2002 15:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: server access newbie question... we have a user that wants to install outlook 2000 on their home machine access our exchange server using his road runner connection instead of the dial-up into the network. It fails, can't find the server. He can telnet to port 25, however. So, it appears you have to be connected to the LAN to be able to find the server through outlook. OWA works fine. is this normal? necessary operation of exchange server? network configuration? his machine? All I have access to is my exchange server, so, I just need some direction on where the problem might be, if it even is a problem...my exchange server, the network, or the guy's computer. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: server access
-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2002 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: server access And just because you do this, not anyone and their brother can connect to your Exchange server regardless of whether or not you have a VPN because they are still going to need to logon and validate their account on the network. You say that as if its difficult. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Sacrilege! Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 11:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing (cuthlah) that trapped Angel in the 3rd Buffy series. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. k-thool-oo Get thee to H.P.Lovecraft. See also Chaosium Games. (http://www.chaosium.com/) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: *groan* PST Files
As it seems that you do actually need large email stores to archive mail which
presumably needs to be reliably stored so you can actually get it back (or else whats
the point of bothering to archive it?), what business functionality would moving them
from a nice reliable easy to back up and manage exchange database store to a
unreliable, difficult to control and backup PST file?
I'm not a fan of shuffling stuff around between different file stores to be honest, it
is at best a short term solution that won't solve your actual problem.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 19/09/2002 10:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: *groan* PST Files
Hi.
Standard Version of EX5.5, SP4. 200+ users.
We are looking at educating users in not storing everything in their email,
but storing in either a .pst or .ost. Money is an issue, my company won't pay
for us to upgrade to 5.5 Enterprise or Exchange 2K, so there's no option IMO
other than educate the packrats, and set up an archiving solution.
I've also read the arguments in the FAQ, but wonder what other folks in a
similar
situation would do, with regard to archiving.
Currently our priv.edb is 13.9 GB, while the pub.edb is 226MB, so would
archiving
essential emails on Public folders be a reasonable idea?
Some of our client handlers need to keep archives for some of our clients, in
case
of compliance issues.
Jon
*
DISCLAIMER
Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and
not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted
with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may
contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in
error and that any use is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please notify the IT
department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this
message.
Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it.
*
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: Exchange Security Breach????
You could start by reading a description of what klez actually does, paying special attention to the bit about forging emails from totally innocent people who have nothing to do with the virus infection. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 19/09/2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Exchange Security Breach What do you mean don't worry about? By the way we have NetShield and GroupShield both running on our exchange server and we do block most of the extensions (.exe,.vbs, etc.) from coming in. Rama Arumugam Network Administrator Wire DynamiX.com (253) 395-4527 -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Security Breach It's Klez. Don't worry about it. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 19, 2002 09:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange Security Breach Subject: Exchange Security Breach Hello everyone, One of my users (unfortunately it's my Supervisor) got an alert from Group Shield saying that his attachment (.exe) was blocked. But he swears that he didn't send out any emails. Couldn't argue with that. Not only that, we were unable to find anything on his Sent Items folder either. Here is what he received on his inbox from Postmaster -Original Message- From: postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] mailto:[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable mail--Helvetica The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Helvetica The attachment is the original mail ** ** * I just can't seem to find any information on this on the internet. Helvetica is a font. That's all I've got so for. Could this be a Security breach? Is someone using my exchange server? Has anyone received any messages like this before? Please help. Any input is welcome! Thanks everyone! rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: *groan* PST Files
You have to ask if theres a real business need for what they are doing, and if so you really have to support it. This is a management issue - if your users have a need to archive this mail properly (which PSTs don't meet due to their problems) then you have a need to upgrade to Ent. edition or invest in some other creative solution which will probably cost more. It's not an easy choice but that choice has to be made - if your employers want to play on the grown up golf course they have to accept they'll have to pay grown up greens fees. Or they'll have to change the way they work. -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 19/09/2002 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: *groan* PST Files Much like Robert, it's an inherited policy that I've stumbled into the sole reponsibilty of, and I'm cobbling bits of info together for a guideline and policy docco to stamp some authority over it. It gets a bit worrying though, when 8-10 people contantly use nearly a fifth of the servers capacity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: New Exchange Server
So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a separate physical volume from the databases. For 150 users, I agree that combining the OS and logs onto the same physical volume (I recommend separate partitions, though) shouldn't present significant performance problems. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server The ideal config is as follows 2 Drives, RAID1, OS 2 Drives, RAID1, Logs 3 or more drives, RAID5 (or 1+0 if you have enough drives), Stores Not everyone has the luxury of so many drives. I have 2 drives in RAID1 for OS and Logs, and 4 in a RAID5 for the Store. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange Server I am in the process of building a new Exchange server and I have been trying to keep up with the post about configuration, but I will ask again. What is the proper hard drive configuration for setting up a new Exchange 2000 box for about 150 users? On which partition should I put the OS, the database etc. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: New Exchange Server
-Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. So when your single pagefile drive fails and you decide that because that isn't reliable enough for you, what next, try to put the pagefile on a ramdisk? Now I remember why I like to build all my own servers. Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
