Oops ... wrong URL:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/
On 11/25/2010 2:06 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I just discovered that Ned Bunnell has a photo blog at Posterous. I
thought I'd pass along the info in the event anyone was unaware
because, as the late, great Johnny Carson would say
Sigh ...
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/
On 11/25/2010 2:07 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Oops ... wrong URL:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/
On 11/25/2010 2:06 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I just discovered that Ned Bunnell has a photo blog at Posterous. I
thought I'd pass along
PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Sigh ...
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/
Yes, that's the blog where he mentioned chatting with Miserere a couple of
weeks back.
On 11/25/2010 2:07 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Oops ... wrong URL:
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/
On 11/25/2010 2:06 PM, Walter Gilbert
Thanks, Darren. I feel 33% less moronic now. ;-)
On 11/25/2010 5:27 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Walter,
Their comments were regarding the blogspot blog that you first (twice)
erroneously linked to.
Bunnell's Posterous blog, on the other hand, has never been noted here
before (I don't believe)
Well, y'all finally shamed me into shooting in DNG. Up until now,
I've been shooting almost exclusively in JPG. The few raw shots I have
taken were throw-away shots I simply discarded out of hand. But,
tonight, I decided to check try out the DNG + JPG function while taking
shots of the
Tell me about it. Three times.
On 11/25/2010 6:07 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the best I can hope for most days.
-Original Message-
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:54:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Ha! That reminds me of a time when my then-girlfriend called me on
her cell while she was at the store. She'd told me where she was, and
what she was looking for. A moment or two later, she says, Hold on
just a sec ... 'Excuse me, could you tell me how much this is? OK,
thank you!
He's pinin' for the fjord.
-- Walt
On 11/24/2010 2:27 AM, d...@rileyelf.free-online.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:44 +1000, Tanya Lovetanyal...@bigpond.com
wrote:
So, I returned last night from a whirlwind trip to Sydney where in 6
days, I
completed 2 x commercial shoots, taught 2
I keep a couple sets of NiMH -- Sanyo Eneloops and Energizers for my
K-x, and they both seem to hold up pretty well. But, if it's going to
be a situation where I know I'm going to need to take a LOT of photos,
but not sure how many, I get the Energizer Ultimate Lithiums if I feel
like I
Damn, indeed. Sorry to hear that.
Another reason lens prices depress the hell out of me.
-- Walt
On 11/24/2010 12:45 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 11/24/2010 1:40 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock
at middle distances was a harbinger
I used to have all manner of nettling little problems like that,
which all started suddenly one day when I installed a Flash update. I
just lived with it for a while, thinking it was a bug that would
eventually be addressed in a later release.
Then, those problems just as suddenly
Well, thankfully, Congress is set to repeal the Law of Unintended
Consequences when they reconvene, and this will all be addressed in
short order.
-- Walt
On 11/24/2010 8:01 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Great news about the surgery, sorry to hear about the food.
Could
Great news about the surgery, sorry to hear about the food.
Could be that's their way of discouraging lengthy hospital stays and
discharge appeals.
But, hey ... even a crappy Thanksgiving will seem like a relative
cornucopia of epicurean treasures after all that.
-- Walt
If only I could afford to be an equipment snob. But, I'm working
toward it.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
Contact Me Facebook http://www.facebook.com/walt.gilbertFlickr
Hear! Hear! I've got integrity out the wazoo.
-- Walt
On 11/23/2010 5:14 PM, Bob W wrote:
I refuse to compromise my artistic integrity by making money out of
photography...
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Lens prices make me glad I live in a town where there are no
structures tall enough from which to defenestrate myself.
-- Walt
On 11/23/2010 7:10 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
So I really am needing a good wide angle zoom. I've been procrastinating on
it for ages and making do with my 18-55mm kit
, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Lens prices make me glad I live in a town where there are no structures tall
enough from which to defenestrate myself.
-- Walt
On 11/23/2010 7:10 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
So I really am needing a good wide angle zoom. I've been procrastinating on
it for ages and making
I love this shot!
I've been hoping to get some snake photos in the wild for quite some
time now, but simply haven't seen any. I did manage to get a shot of a
boa constrictor recently, at a wildlife refuge. But, it's nowhere near
as interesting to look at as your shot here, bland colors and
Thanks, Ted.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. And, that's why I have this little
twinge of guilt for not using a tripod more often. I know it ends up
producing better photos, and forces you to be more deliberative in your
composition. And, yet ... when I shoot off a tripod, you might as
://my.wisestamp.com/link?u=ypgdb385pypw7fhbsite=www.wisestamp.com/email-install.
Get it now
http://my.wisestamp.com/link?u=ypgdb385pypw7fhbsite=www.wisestamp.com/email-install
On 11/22/2010 9:41 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/22/2010 3:33 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
So, I was just curious as to the thoughts
--- @ WiseStamp Signature
http://my.wisestamp.com/link?u=ypgdb385pypw7fhbsite=www.wisestamp.com/email-install.
Get it now
http://my.wisestamp.com/link?u=ypgdb385pypw7fhbsite=www.wisestamp.com/email-install
On 11/22/2010 10:50 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/22/2010 6:41 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote
As an audiophile of somewhat limited means, my first purchase was a
Denon integrated amplifier -- PMA-950 A/V, which lasted nearly 20
years. I loved it so much, I've bought Denon equipment almost
exclusively ever since. Granted, I've had to scrimp and save to do so,
but in my experience,
Thanks, Ken.
I plan to do just that, particularly on any landscape or architecture
shots in the near future.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
Contact Me Facebook
I meant to comment on this shot earlier, but somehow, I must have
gotten distracted.
Anyway -- love the shot! I live in the heart of duck hunting country
(right on the Mississippi flyway) and have never had a chance to get a
shot like that. I even have a close friend who is part-owner of
In the modern game, they'd have probably kept him in a pitching
rotation, unfortunately.
He was a southpaw, after all. :-\
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
Contact Me Facebook
Sounds like my PC audio set-up, which is a used Denon AVR-900 from
eBay, with a Bose Acoustimass 5 LFE I picked up at a warehouse clearance
for $50 without the satellite speakers -- in place of which, I use a set
of Sony SS-TS503's from Overstock. Works pretty well for computer
audio, and
Thanks for the input! I think I may have come up with the best
option -- a sort of reverse monopod.
A 1/4 bolt through a length of lightweight chain. Run the bolt through
one end of the chain (making sure the link is smaller than the head of
the bolt) -- screw into the camera, step on the
Great idea! Thanks, Bob!
A little rubberized/silicone coating on the Vise-Grips jaws would make
them pretty versatile, too.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
Contact Me Facebook
On 11/22/2010 9:15 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
--- On Mon, 11/22/10, Bob Sullivanrf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Other alternative is a 'Vise-Grip'
pliers with a bolt or two braised onto them.
Now you're cookin'...
Agreed. A real-world baste solution if I ever saw one.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
After re-consulting Peterson's, I think you're right. Though, it
looks like it might be a house finch, due to the less contrasting
markings around the eye, and more squared-off tail feathers. Both, very
similar to a sparrow.
I could never be an ornithologist. Aside from the difficulty in
Hi all,
The sudden surge of bird photos reminded me of this one. It's a shot I
took a couple of weeks after I first got my K-x. There's nothing
particularly special about the shot, though the bird was pretty cool in
that it seemed intent on being photographed. As I crept down the dusty
any more.
Paul
On Nov 21, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
The sudden surge of bird photos reminded me of this one. It's a shot I took a
couple of weeks after I first got my K-x. There's nothing particularly special
about the shot, though the bird was pretty cool
Wow, Ted! You got some really nice shots there.
On 11/21/2010 2:23 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Diane and I went up to the square here in Fayetteville, and photographed the
annual Lights of the Ozarks display the city does every year. Basic photo info:
K 7, handheld mostly except one shot
I have to say, but for the introduction of the K-r so shortly
thereafter, since I bought my K-x, I've never felt the slightest twinge
of buyer's remorse. And, I most certainly have never asked myself, Why
didn't I go with the Canon?
-- Walt
On 11/21/2010 6:45 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
Hi all,
For the past couple of days, I seem to keep encountering references to
stochastic photography -- or spray and pray if you will, and it's
piqued my interest. It's not that I'm considering actively pursuing the
practice so much as I wonder how much my current style (method?) could
On 11/21/2010 7:59 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-11-21 20:33, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
For the past couple of days, I seem to keep encountering references to
stochastic photography --
I prefer to think about it as Brownian. ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Duly noted. I guess my biggest concern is, based on some of the
comments on some of the stories about stochastic method I've read,
whether or not I'm missing out on a lot of texture by being lazy. I've
seen so many images that are just so rich in detail, yet the subject
matter seemed to be
Interesting. I suffer from nearly the opposite malady. Using an 8
Gig card, I seem to be overly conscious of taking extra shots. For
instance, even though I keep my camera in fast drive mode , if I
accidentally take more than one exposure, I invariably and reflexively
say, Dammit! and
Well, no wonder you went over my head the first time. :-D
When I read your reply, I immediately googled Brownian Photography to
see what you were talking about, and it brought up several links to
stock photos of brownian movement: http://is.gd/hyUfu
Funny, huh?
-- Walt
Thanks, David.
That post was where I first read the reference to stochastic
photography, but I didn't really have a clue as to what it meant at the
time I saw it. It wasn't until today, when I stumbled across the
reference in another article that I decided to read up on it a little,
but
That sort of gets at one of the reasons I delete those extra images.
Part of the reason I feel like they're wasted shutter actuations is
that, dumb as it may sound, the extra shots just don't feel like my
shots. Keeping them feels a little like taking a shortcut, and sort of
encourages a
Don't remember seeing this posted to the list, so forgive me if this
is old news. But, I couldn't *not* share it.
http://spellingfails.com/post/1314299088/pentax-cameras-spelling-fail
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
I have every confidence you'll find a warm (if belated) reception,
Ted. It took a full six weeks-plus for all of my original submissions
to be accepted and/or declined.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
Great shot! Looking through my Peterson's Field Guide, the closest
match I could find is the juvenile Slate-colored Junco, which is indeed
a sparrow. Then again, it could be any number of sparrows. I'm just
going by the pretty pictures in the birdy book.
-- Walt
On 11/20/2010 7:47 PM,
HI all,
I've been meaning to ask this for some time now, but just keep
forgetting to. Anyway, here goes: From day one of ownership, I've had
the expanded sensitivity enabled on my K-x. I can force it manually all
the way up to the 12800 top-end limit, but have yet to figure out a way
to
I meant not *Sensitivity Priority* or any other.
On 11/18/2010 4:39 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
HI all,
I've been meaning to ask this for some time now, but just keep
forgetting to. Anyway, here goes: From day one of ownership, I've had
the expanded sensitivity enabled on my K-x. I can
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:39:29PM -0600, Walter Gilbert wrote:
HI all,
I've been meaning to ask this for some time now, but just keep
forgetting to. Anyway, here goes: From day one of ownership, I've had
the expanded sensitivity enabled on my K-x. I can force it manually all
the way up
Actually, when I went to change it, it appears I was right,
according to the dialogue on the menu screen.
On: Enables ISO sensitivity from 100 to 12800
Off: ISO sensitivity can be set from 200 to 6400
Curious, that.
On 11/18/2010 5:40 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Ah! I see. I thought
I do ... or, did, actually.
Thanks, Matthew!
On 11/18/2010 5:59 PM, Matthew Montgomery wrote:
On Nov 18, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Actually, when I went to change it, it appears I was right, according to the
dialogue on the menu screen.
Do you have d-range highlight
I'll keep you in my thoughts in the interim, Stan. I somewhat know
what you're going through, so you have my very best wishes.
-- Walt
On 11/18/2010 8:32 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks for the good wishes, on and off list. Surgery postponed for now, last
minute family emergency and the
Congratulations, Nick! I loved that pic when you posted it!
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 6:14 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Yay! ///Finally/// another photo got approved for the PPG!!
Thanks, Steve. The Goddernator would have made a good title. Wish
I'd thought of it.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 10:41 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
The Goddernator. Neat shot.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:20 PM,
It's the emptiness of the beer. :-(
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 8:52 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
There's some kind of essential sadness you've captured in that simple
shot.
On 11/17/2010 7:32 AM, frank theriault
Just give the ones with the boo-boos to the husbands. That way,
they'll have an excuse in case they forget. What do I know? I got the
screwed up calendar!
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 9:53 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
...@robertstech.com wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Just give the ones with the boo-boos to the husbands. That way,
they'll have an excuse in case they forget. What do I know? I got the
screwed up calendar!
Genius!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Hey! I took a Great Photograph this summer!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5184984568/
Man, that was easy.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 10:10 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
You and my great niece.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 10:40 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Hey. I've been looking for that trike . . .
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Walter
I picked up on that. Could be I need batteries for my
Sarcastoblaster and Ironichron.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 10:43 AM, CheekyGeek wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, a lot of what Miserere was saying in that article
I know. Just goes to show you, anyone can take great photos ... even
with a Pentax.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/17/2010 10:47 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm submitting a few more images for the Pentax Gallery, and just wanted
to get a little input on this shot, as I'm on the fence about it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5185239879/
K-x, DAL 18-55 (at 18mm), f/4, ISO 800, 1/3200, Aperture Priority
(I'd been taking
Thanks, Christine!
I *tried* to do him justice, but in the end, all imitations are pale. :-)
-- Walt
On 11/17/2010 7:55 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hi Walt: A well executed homage to our Godfrey! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
I'm glad y'all enjoyed it. I did the best I could with the limited
resources at hand. :-)
-- Walt
On 11/17/2010 12:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Misereremiser...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2010 23:20, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect a lot of PDML ears were burning as we were looking through
Ted's yearbooks.
On 11/17/2010 12:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/17/2010 6:20 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
I consulted with Ted, who was quick to point out, Godfrey would know
what to do with it. I agreed.
Corollary
Of course, I would never come up with an overwrought title like that!
On 11/17/2010 10:35 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Better title: The Goddernator Stalks it's Prey
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Steve. The Goddernator would have made
... and we're all better off for it. :-)
On 11/17/2010 3:51 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Know what to do with it. Godfrey used to have one, and a great set of lenses to
go with it, but decided that it was too big to carry in his camera bag and sold
them all to buy an 8x10 view camera and three
A good bit of my self-esteem rests on that very premise.
On 11/14/2010 10:20 AM, Bob W wrote:
things can be vulgar AND funny!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I dig this mightily.
-- Walt
On 11/14/2010 6:00 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
A shot from about a year ago at Cockatoo Island in Sydney Harbour.
I like the shadow patterns in this as well as the intersecting lines.
I've had a few tries at processing it over the intervening period,
Haven't you heard? A guy recently bought a whole bunch of them at a
yard sale for $5.00
http://is.gd/hkfv0
Little has been spoken of archrival Harry Westmen, who pioneered
albumen printing on white bread. All his great prints have been either
lost or eaten.
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
I see your point, Brian. That hadn't occurred to me at all, and it
may be why I'm on the fence about it. I loved the colors, and the way
the clouds suggested smoke emanating from the fiery color in the
trees. But, there's no point in the photo that draws the eye.
I'll go ahead and
Just to make sure I have this right -- any post to PDML that has
PESO or GESO (case-sensitive, as you said) *automatically* goes to the
Twitter feed, and that's it? You don't have to engage in any other
alchemy or wizardry? If so, how'd you do that? That's pretty spiffy.
-- Walt
Best wishes to you, John!
My dad had surgery for that several years ago and all went well. He had
to undergo the chemo and radiation therapy as well, but you'd have never
known it unless he told you. Here's hoping you have as smooth a ride,
or even better.
-- Walt
Hah! :-D
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 10:42 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 10-11-16 11:36 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Just to make sure I have this right -- any post to PDML that has
PESO or GESO
Hi all,
This is a shot I took on my recent trip to Arkansas on one of my family
outing days, taken at the Wilderness Safari in Gentry, Arkansas (which I
HIGHLY recommend if you should ever find yourself in the area).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5181653663/
K-x, DAL 50-200 (at
Best of luck to you, too, Stan! You'll be in my thoughts as well.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 10:59 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Hey John - I go in Friday morning for the same thing. Send some good thoughts
my way . . .
Best of
Thanks, Dan!
Here's another cormorant I captured that day: Cormorantus Rex
http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5182322610/
K-x, DAL 50-200 (at 115), f/4.5, 1/400, ISO 200, Aperture Priority
It was a very cool place for photography, I have to say.
-- Walt
Absolutely love it! What a great shot.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 9:52 AM, CheekyGeek wrote:
http://www.pixelsmithy.com/absolutely-fireproof
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks, Frank!
I was just joshing around with the whole cormorant thing.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 11:54 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Walter
Great shot! Very placid, glassy surface.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 12:26 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
So peaceful. -T
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
With any luck, it'll cause a precipitous price drop for the K-r and
bring it further down into the entry-level range, and I'll be able to
have illuminated focus points, improved low-light focusing, and higher
frame rate for a fairly good price as I begin to approach 50,000 clicks
on my K-x.
Well, if they keep coming out like this one, you need all you can get!
Very nice. I've never seen mushrooms pose before.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I keep asking myself how many
Hi all,
As Ted and I were finishing up our time at War Eagle Mill, we came
across this rather large hunk of iron that must have been a part taken
from the workings of the mill. I thought it was intriguing, but lacked
the intestinal fortitude (literally and figuratively) to try and sneak
Now, now. Let's not get our tit in a wringer.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 9:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Don't grouse.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, David J Brookspentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at
Success!
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 10:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
test
--
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, Brian.
As I posted in my photo blog, Picher was immensely fascinating for me.
I think I could have stayed there shooting for an entire week and never
run out of shots to take. I wondered what became of Gloria and Tom,
too. I always love finding things like that -- personal
I started to post the photos I took to Flickr, but quickly grew
annoyed at the fact that it was taking forever to get them all uploaded
(and that I've exceeded my 200-photo limit!!!). So, I went ahead and
put together a couple of blog posts with some of the images I took on
our treks out
Hi all!
Just wanted to check in and let everyone know that the trip to northwest
Arkansas, where I was most graciously hosted by Ted Beilby. He took me
around to several excellent sites that made for an absolutely joyful
experience for me as a budding photographer. I can't thank him enough
I have finally landed at home, in western Kentucky.
As Ted said, couple of the sites weren't at what he would consider to be
prime photo fodder, but I thoroughly enjoyed every place we went to.
Even War Eagle Mill provided some interesting images that I'm anxious to
dig into, despite the
- just let go and have fun with your camera, don't sweat
about lenses, etc.
HTH.
Boris
On 11/7/2010 5:26 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Just wanted to give everyone a heads-up that I'll be leaving tomorrow to
go on a week-long excursion to Arkansas, whereupon I shall engage the
tutelage
/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/ http://polipix.posterous.com/
On 11/7/2010 3:45 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 6/11/10, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any suggestions in addition to the guiding hand of Mr. Beilby will be
much appreciated.
Ted is a real gentleman and one
Hi all,
Just wanted to give everyone a heads-up that I'll be leaving tomorrow to
go on a week-long excursion to Arkansas, whereupon I shall engage the
tutelage of one Ted Beilby. Unfortunately, my finances will be severely
limited, forcing me to subsist on hard tack and salt pork.
Lamentably, my rejection was richly deserved.
Maybe January's PUG could be, What the hell was I thinking?
-- Walt
On 11/4/2010 7:24 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
It can happen to any photograph: A dust speck, a tilted horizon, or a
slight underexposer makes your whole picture unacceptable.
But do any of them have the soul of an Olympus?
I think not.
-- Walt
On 11/5/2010 12:11 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
All DLSR's are direct competetors of each other, or not, depends on
how you look at it. It's in a different market segment.
On 11/4/2010 8:31 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
The
Favre
-- Walt (the other one)
On 11/4/2010 6:55 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
So, what new words are we using today because of digital photography?
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
I may not be the best person to explain the difference, but I'll
try. The difference is subtle.
In When I say to you -- the word to indicates that I am
communicating with you particularly.
In using When I'm saying you, there's no indication that anyone in
particular is being addressed.
You're more than welcome, Boris.
I have to admire anyone who manages to learn English as a non-native
speaker -- or any other language, really. :-)
-- Walt
On 11/3/2010 1:48 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Thanks, Walter. I think it clears this issue completely.
Boris
--
PDML
Hi all,
OK, I'll get the boasting out of the way, first: I found out yesterday
that I've had three more of my submissions accepted, and one declined,
for the Pentax Photo Gallery. I'll take those odds! I still have two
of my original submissions pending, and two new ones uploaded since I
Thanks, Dave.
After a little more research, I discovered that what you do is generally
the best way to go as far as getting photos on the wire. I also get the
impression that selling to wire services isn't really the wisest thing
to do, since they generally require that you sign over all
My personal favorite whole bean:
http://www.mysticmonkcoffee.com/store/storefront.php
Mystic Monk Blend, Cowboy Blend, and Colombian are all worth getting
power of attorney over Gramma's estate and selling her house out from
under her.
-- Walt
On 11/3/2010 1:18 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
On
That's why I filtered Hitler.
On 11/3/2010 1:31 PM, Cotty wrote:
Congratulations, you've just
justified the holocaust.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
submitted
it. We'll see, I suppose. I won't be heartbroken if it's rejected, though.
-- Walt
On 11/3/2010 1:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
OK, I'll get the boasting out of the way, first: I found out yesterday that
I've had three more of my
401 - 500 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
