How was this resolved? I'm encountering the same problems with 4.0.3 and a
fresh install.
On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 7:25:18 AM UTC-4 harish.va...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The issue has been addressed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sunday, 27 June 2021 at 17:06:01 UTC+5:30 harish.va...@gmail.com
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4457/
--
New update by cantrianbear
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4457
I'm not a developer for the tool, but I've poked around on the innards
enough to take some stabs at guesses.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 5:21:34 PM UTC-8, Danila Ladner wrote:
>
> Hello guys i am in need of RB help.
> I have lost my reviewboard installation, i only have mysql backup of it
no longer use "rbt" with username +
password authentication, but the same username + password works when
logging into the website directly?
Any suggestions for how to troubleshoot this / reproduce the problem?
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.revie
Did you upgrade ReviewBoard? To what version did you upgrade?
I'm struggling with a GitLab problem right now, and certainly got past what
you describe when using ReviewBoard 3.0.14.
Eric
On Monday, May 13, 2019 at 12:51:03 AM UTC-7, Akshay Agarwal wrote:
>
> Can someone help?
>
&g
rk
they do making it. Perhaps pay for support from the company help untangle
the issue you've got? It may save you a lot of time, and be worth every
dollar spent.
Eric.
>
> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2019 15:28:47 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Martin
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:12 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:31 PM 'Eric Johnson' via Review Board
> Community wrote:
> > The one challenge I observed with the ReviewBoard packages was that
> rbintegrations included a small handfule of bina
y 31, 2019 at 12:58:31 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Can you verify that rbintegrations was also packaged and that its
> extension is enabled?
>
> We really don't advise installing from our tarballs, as we build the eggs
> and wheels with a particula
Mostly, I've managed to get quite far with packaging ReviewBoard for Linux.
Although I don't know much about the Gentoo packaging system, it has turned
out to be easier than I feared.
We're currently running ReviewBoard 2.5.18, installed using the portage
package manager. So we have done this
Hi Alfred,
Were you ever able to resolve this issue? I'm now seeing an roughly
identical problem with my install of 3.0.14...
I'm running Djblets 1.0.11, but looks to be the only substantive
difference
Eric.
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 11:41:48 AM UTC-7, Alfred von Campe wrote
security-and-bug-fix-releases/
>
This page trails off at the end of the last sentence. Also the link to
2.5.18 release notes is broken.
Eric.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4743/
--
New update by suntzu86
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4743
as getting it to run that way as just putting together a
docker image. I'd have to update the PYTHON_PATH
Also, I was hoping someone might already have created some kind of Docker
build file that does most of what I need, although nobody has piped up yet.
Eric.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:35 PM
On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 9:54:23 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM eric via Review Board Community <
> revie...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks so much for the response.
>>
orking. Trying to
figure that out now.
Since Gentoo mostly builds from source, I want to get it to work from the
tar.gz distribution, but I can probably fall back to installing from the
egg file, if I can't get this to work. Looks like the egg file has
everything built as needed, and I wouldn't
orage/pipeline.storage.NonPackagingPipelineCachedStorage/"
-i djblets/settings.py || die
Will this cause any problems (other than perhaps being slower than if the
post-processing was in place)?
Eric.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Eric Johnson <e...@tibco.com> wrote:
> I'm tripping over getting
)
Not exactly sure what to do from here. Options I can think of:
- Change something like setup.py or settings.py so that "less" won't be
executed.
- Figure out how to get less in place before this line executes
- Avoid running setup.py - it appears that pip install Djb
need the dependency, then it should be on version
2.6.9 or later, as 2.6.8 has a bug that affects ReviewBoard.
Thanks!
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com
Hi,
I just jump into this conversation to say that we have the same problem
here: we have to manage a "review" as a set of changes across multiple
repositories.
So +1 for this feature to be implemented.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pa
I believe I figured this out.
Turns out, a space had snuck into a URL for repository configuration.
Perhaps the server should validate that the URL has no spaces?
Eric.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:35 PM, David Trowbridge <trowb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Eric,
>
> How is the reposi
/RBTools-0.7.10-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py",
line 663, in run_from_argv
exit_code = self.main(*args) or 0
File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/RBTools-0.7.10-py2.7.egg/rbtools/commands/post.py",
line 812, in main
(msg_prefix, e))
rbtools.commands.Comm
Perfect! Thanks for letting me know!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM, David Trowbridge <trowb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Eric,
>
> This is a known bug where some of the existing users in the group have
> since been marked "inactive". If you remove those users,
quot;. Clicking on the "x" has no effect. I was able
to get it to work briefly by adding a user to the group, and then the "x"
controls would highlight. However, as soon as I clicked one, they stopped
working again.
Is this a general problem with the software, or something about our
I've not used webhooks myself, but based on the stack trace, it appears
that you've turned them on, and the attempt to invoke a hook is failing.
So go look in your configuration, and either fix your webhook
configuration, or disable them?
Eric.
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 12:43:01 PM
Thanks so much for the reply
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com
> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> RBTools itself isn't handling SSL/TLS, and has no awareness of the various
> protocols/ciphers. We use Python's urllib2 to establish the connect
t rbt uses the older protocol & cipher? I've been advised to
go run wireshark, and maybe that will provide more insight.
Eric.
On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:02:28 AM UTC-7, er...@tibco.com wrote:
>
> The specific, full message is this:
>
> ERROR: Coul
tup-repo takes any "verbose" options that will
clarify the problem.
Suggestions?
Thanks!
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Ha
I have exactly the same questions. Did you ever get these questions
answered? I am using ReviewBoard 2.5.6.1 on a Rad Hat Enterprise 7.1
system. Any help would be appreciated.
-Eric
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 11:21:42 AM UTC-5, Khalil Shalish wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4427/
--
New ticket #4427 by themaze75
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
e replaced
those with discrete votes? Previous requests seem to point to just getting
rid of the link by updating the CSS.
Regards,
Eric
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 7:04:18 PM UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> A couple comments:
>
> 1) allowed_met
Administrators
to rebuild their search index, and also condense diffs?
So I seem to have found a work-around to the problem - in case anyone else
runs into it.
Eric.
On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 1:40:06 PM UTC-7, er...@tibco.com wrote:
>
> I re-ran the migration, and before doing anythin
n after
the upgrade.
Problem went away.
Weird. Do you want me to try to find out more, and if so, what?
Eric.
On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Hmm, we'll need to look into that. Is there a way you'd be able to send us
> the
k
warn(w[-1], self.Warning, 3)
Warning: Invalid utf8 character string: '890600'
Note that if I set DEBUG = False, then I see the diffs in the browser, but
I still see warnings in the log file. I'm nervous that migrating my
production system forward to 2.5.4 will corrupt
Ugh. Me with egg on my face.
My automated script to perform the indexing, and turn on searching - turns
out I had a typo.
Eric.
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 5:08:04 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Just to check, is Search enabled in Settings?
>
> The a
obably need a json response
response = "OK"
return HttpResponse(response)
Regards,
Eric
On Friday, May 6, 2016 at 10:07:31 PM UTC+12, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> The `model` and `uri_object_key` are configurations for a resource's
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 5:56:32 PM UTC+12, Eric Holmberg wrote:
>
>
>> *More details*
>> I did a test install of RB on a virtual machine and the window sizing
>> works as expected. However, my production environment consists of having
>> the RB URL reques
he RB set to /reviews directly to see if the
> issue is in the proxy or in non-root URL's with RB.
>
I have confirmed that the sizing issue appears to be a result of the Apache
Proxy (most likely a quirk of ProxyHTMLURLMap not rewriting a URL
correctly). I'm trying to dig through the HTML an
e requests when viewing the network requests,
so it seems to be an issue with JavaScript somewhere getting surprised by
the root directory change and/or an issue with the proxy configuration.
I'm setting up a VM with the RB set to /reviews directly to see if the
issue is in the proxy or in non-root UR
f you need further details. Reviewboard 2.5.4, Ubuntu Server
14.04
LTS.
Regards,
Eric
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https:/
ou give me a pointer as to where to start with the
change? Should I just file a bug?
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us k
need the two or three lines of code that launch
Django properly with the RB configuration, and then the rest is straightforward.
You may need to play around with ReviewBoard permissions as well, and that will
be much easier if you start from the Python APIs
Eric
--
Supercharge your Review Board
with moving the
ReviewBoard instance from one machine to another, and not keeping the
secret key.
Eric.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Sam <msamifa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have over 400 files to review. When I run the cleartool diff on the last
> file in the trace I dont see any error bu
imes. Set "Debug" to "False",
problem occurs. "Debug = True", and problem goes away.
This has all the classic signs of being an uninitialized variable. Arghhh.
Any suggestions you have for further debugging would be most welcome. I
fear that this is a bug in Dja
I suspect this is the same problem as this:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard/7B09m8X70UU/Ml3ocxNuDQAJ
I'm guessing rbt is merely faithfully passing along the problem encountered
on the server.
Eric.
On Friday, October 16, 2015 at 12:35:31 PM UTC-7, Sam wrote:
>
> Hello,
&g
This suggests your Python install is busted:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26802182/django-expat-issue
Perhaps reinstall Python? Or perhaps upgrade to 2.7?
Eric.
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 11:03:59 AM UTC-7, Ishan Dixit wrote:
Hi,
I am getting this import error on upgrading rb-site
That problem seems to be much more about Python's easy_install, and not
much to do about Ansible.
Hopefully someone with more experience with that can help you out.
Eric.
On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 2:17:38 AM UTC-7, Noopur Sankhere wrote:
Hi Eric,
I am trying to installI
production state.
Then, once it executes flawlessly, run the script against production. It
executed relatively quickly, with almost no downtime.
Hope that helps.
Eric.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 12:46:34 AM UTC-7, Noopur Sankhere wrote:
Hi,
Can you please post here the steps for this? How
, and memcached didn't change the
result.
Also, I'm worried that previous review requests will now be broken.
Please advise
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https
like the upgrade.
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because
In the dashboard I can look at all reviews on the “All Review Requests”
page.
When I try to look at the certain reviews using rbt api-get or by doing and
HTTP GET from /api/review-requests/ using the same credentials I get You
don't have permission for this. Anyone know why?
Thanks,
Eric
of the ReviewBoard
repository in .reviewboardrc
Is there any way to get the username password out of the Path URL?
Thanks!
Eric.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https
to configure reviewboard to send diffs with its
review-request emails?
Thanks,
Eric
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https
/security
releases/etc.).
But I do let easy_install grab everything else.
Eric.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hi Eric,
Glad it works!
One suggestion I'd have is to let easy_install do its job with
dependencies, rather than trying
to understand how best to configure for our environment. Thanks for
checking!
Eric.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com
wrote:
One more question-- is there a reason why you're going 1.7.7.1 - 1.7.8,
instead of just jumping straight to the latest 1.7.x (or even
anything for
exactly this version - but perhaps for a later version, that I can adjust
for the older database schema?
Thanks!
Eric
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https
the Python25 directory has come into play?
I suspect you've got some sort of path problem that leads to trying to use
two different versions of Python at the same time. Start by fixing that.
Eric.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Felix Wei elixy...@gmail.com wrote:
When i tried to install RBTools
not sure what's supposed to be there, but I'm pretty sure its not
supposed to 404.
Regards,
-Eric.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http
So far as I know, you'll need to write your own customized
authentication/authorization plugin. It isn't hard. Been many months since
I did this, but if you have any familiarity with Python coding, then taking
the existing authorization handlers and modifying it should be
straightforward.
Eric
it require injecting the groups directly into the database or is there
a better way?
Thanks,
Eric
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/webapi/2.0/resources/review-group/
Review groups cannot be created or modified through the API.
Eric
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:22:59 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Eric,
Can you show me where the API documentation says no? 1.7.x has
Hm. I see POST and PUT operations for create and update are specified, so
maybe it is just an old message?
Eric
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:40:04 PM UTC-7, Eric Miller wrote:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/webapi/2.0/resources/review-group/
Review groups cannot be created
I found that it was easiest to simply copy the code from the authenticator
closest to what I want,ed and then customize as needed.
Then select the new authenticator as your custom option.
Eric
On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Kan danielk...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using RB 1.7.x
the
data.
Then migrate the data. Test again.
Only then upgrade to a newer version. Test again.
Eric
On Aug 21, 2013, at 8:30 PM, patrick zhao wrote:
In our company, we installed reviewboard on a windows server, and the rb
version is 1.5.
Recently we have a more powerful linux server, so we decide
I ran into this problem when I tried to upgrade past 1.7.7.1.
Very curious about the answer.
Eric
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 25, 2013, at 5:04 AM, Dirk Best star...@gmail.com wrote:
I've changed the reviewboard database to latin1 and it installs fine now
(because the key is now less than
during login.
c) Made sure my new file was on the path for ReviewBoard, then configured
the authentication administrative setting to use my new file.
Eric.
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:29:35 AM UTC-7, Pablo G wrote:
Hi guys.
I have a RB installation validating against an LDAP server
Hi Joe,
Sorry I've not responded yet. Not near my computer at the moment. Hopefully I
can send a useful tidbit later today or tomorrow. Putting it on my todo list.
Eric
On Jun 5, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Joe Reyna joseph.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eric, can you post your modified custom
I'm trying to figure out what the appropriate Raw file URL mask is for a
GitHub Enterprise installation. Can someone help me out?
- Eric
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
.
Eric
On 12/18/12 3:07 AM, Ben Copeland wrote:
Hello,
I import users from active directory using ldap. I do this because
users are not populated in reviewboard from AD. We add and remove many
users from our system, so it is easier if this process was linked via
a sync method. So if users
I'd add that it is unlikely that you really want to delete all traces of a user
in ReviewBoard history. If you need to deactivate an account, why not just do
that?
Eric
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:28 PM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you clarify why you want
specific to the
machine in question, or do you have this problem from any machine from
which you've tried?
-Eric.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:34 AM, murali nag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
While I am doing the post-review from command line, the following
errors were getting
Traceback (most recent
I know I previously looked to see if I could get memcached to report what it
has cached, but I didn't find anything.
Eric
On May 14, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, been on vacation this week.
I'm not sure if memcached provides an easy way
instance of memcached for each instance of reviewboard?
-Eric.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from
Hi Jack,
I didn't see anyone respond to your question. If you haven't figured out the
answer, it is the difference between a synchronous (search_s) and an
asynchronous (search) invocation.
-Eric.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, jack jack jais...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
What
I'm looking at a review from a co-worker, and I'd really like to have her
code on my development machine, so that I can run the unit tests and mess
around generally.
I figured that I'd be able to download the diff from the review
(http://our-reviewboard.server/r/123/diff/raw/) and apply that
?
SITE_ROOT must be '/reviewboard/' for subdirs to work at all.
Christian
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011, Eric Mann e...@eam.me wrote:
So I decided to go back through and document the behavior of each
variation:
SITE_ROOT FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME
Behavior'/reviewboard
.
In the meantime ... if you have any further ideas for things I can change,
settings I can tweak, or even places in the code I might hack to get this
working I'm all ears. Ideally, this will need to end up in a subdirectory
anyway, so the sooner we can move on that the better.
~Eric
On Wed, Jun 1
, Django tried these URL
patterns, in this order:
1. ^reviewboard/
The current URL, , didn't match any of these.
I made sure to set Debug = True so I could get this message ... any ideas?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Hi Eric,
When we build URLs
OK, now that I have Review Board set up and running, I'm a happy
camper. But I have a workflow question.
We host all of our development repositories on a local server
(devserver) and map the repositories to local drives to make live
with TortoiseHg a bit easier (R:\ = \\devserver\Repositories).
, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Hi Eric,
So, I'm not a Mercurial person (though many people on the list are and can
I'm sure give you some better insight into this), but in general, you should
be able to point Review Board at any repository and not worry about
Running Review Board 1.5.5 on Apache 2.2 under Windows Server 2003. Just
about everything works beautifully, except ...
The subdirectory is stripped off of the URL in rare cases.
I'm running Review Board as http://devserver/reviewboard/ This way it can
run along side Trac
we come to it.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Eric Mann e...@eam.me wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Christian Hammond
chip...@chipx86.comwrote
them to for manually
installing RBTools?
Eric
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
.
Eric
On May 13, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Joe gjwilso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Currently, whenever we had to add an user from ldap to a group, the
user has to first login to the system, so that the user is added to
the reviewboard database.
We want a way to avoid having the user to login in order
I achieved your aim for our local copy of ReviewBoard by snagging the existing
LDAP code, and modifying it slightly. I then used the modified code as a custom
authenticator.
That way, unauthorized people- not in the reviewboard DB - don't get
authenticated.
Eric
On Mar 23, 2011, at 8:29 AM
Could be a browser configuration issue too. Did you ask the person to try from
a different browser?
Eric
On Mar 14, 2011, at 4:45 AM, daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com
daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am using LDAP to authenticate users in Review board - this obviously
means I have little
hoping to get a Linux box instead - thanks for response.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Hi Eric,
I think you're locked out because of the first error. It looks like
the ldap module isn't properly installed. The Python module was found
Hi,
I'm trying to get ReviewBoard working with Active Directory on
Windows. When I install a new site, login, and change the auth type
to LDAP, I am getting the following error when I try to log back in:
2011-02-22 10:44:00,331 - ERROR - Exception thrown for user
AnonymousUser at
, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Eric,
Today, there isn't anything for that. You can work around this by
patching reviewboard/admin/views.py to have site_settings check
request.user.is_superuser and return some sort of result (redirecting
to the login page, or something), and patching
templates/admin
, and haven't figured it out.
I'm okay with making patches to my local copy, if that's what it takes.
Eric
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
?
Thanks for any help/direction you can offer.
-Eric Johnson
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group
As far as I can tell, I have all the dependencies installed, except
I'm getting this error (error modified to exclude actual server
names):
mod_python (pid=431, interpreter='reviewboard_foo_example_com',
phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'):
Application error
second. Has this been noticed
before? Any thoughts about preventing incremental indexing while the full
index is running?
Also, what's the motivation for doing the full index? Is it trying to
pick up changes that aren't caught by checking the last_updated field?
-Eric
What are the plans for the 1.0.5 release? I'm planning on upgrading our
reviewboard server, and I'd like to pick up the latest fixes on the 1.0.x
branch.
-Eric
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
-web.com/install_review_board_on_fedora
Eric P.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:13 AM, grimbeavertbrez...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this as well. I've opened a documentation bug for it:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1199
On Jun 30, 8:05 am, Jim Priest thecr...@gmail.com wrote
be asking this.
Thanks for reading,
Eric P.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Ah... right. I figured it was a simple oversight on my part. I see
the 'Expand' links now too that brings in all the preceding code.
Thanks, Jeff!
Eric P.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jeff Androsj...@bigredtj.com wrote:
Reviewboard displays the files in a two column view. It pulls
) but in
the Subversion diff it's a tab (0x09). Is
the Trac diff truly an invalid diff, or is Review Board just being picky?
Thanks,
Eric P.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send
It is.
$ python -V
Python 2.6
Eric
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86.com wrote:
The thing to make sure then is that the version of Python that's being used
for Review Board is 2.6.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http
-1.4.0.rc2.patch
Is that in any way related to my issue (note: I didn't apply it when I
built libmemcache).
Thanks,
Eric
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Eric Peric.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
It is.
$ python -V
Python 2.6
Eric
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86
, thanks for reading.
Eric P
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
