Greetings.
I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and
wonder where the best place might be to do this.
And, of course, any changes to the code need to be made available for all.
I have the following:
1. An entire interpretive language that can be used as a shell
As an appointment, I use an EDIT MACRO from Mark Zelden (thanks a lot Mark)
named COLUTIL that is one of the most usefull piece of code I have. ISPF Edit
is really enhancend with this macro.
You can download from http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutilr.html#macros
Angel Luis
seems like the CBT tape would be a good home for this. see
http://www.cbttape.org/
-- Stephen
Clem Clarke wrote:
Greetings.
I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and
wonder where the best place might be to do this.
And, of course, any changes to the code need
Clem Clarke wrote:
Greetings.
I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and
wonder where the best place might be to do this.
Hi Clem,
Either Sam Knutson or Sam Golob at www.cbttape.org would be more than
happy to provide a place for your code. Does this now mean
Paul Gillis wrote:
Clem Clarke wrote:
Greetings.
I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and
wonder where the best place might be to do this.
Hi Clem,
Either Sam Knutson or Sam Golob at www.cbttape.org would be more than
happy to provide a place for your code.
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
I vaguly remember reading a paper (about 7 or 8 years ago) where
somebody turn off SMF recording and saw no measureable difference in CPU
utilziation.
I wonder how they measured it?
Regards, Paul Gillis
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:42 +1000, Paul Gillis wrote:
Took a few breaths and re-read your email. I would recommend it all went
onto the cbttape, and if an open source license is required, why not use
the GNU General Public License available at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
That
Shane wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:42 +1000, Paul Gillis wrote:
Took a few breaths and re-read your email. I would recommend it all went
onto the cbttape, and if an open source license is required, why not use
the GNU General Public License available at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
Paul Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
I vaguly remember reading a paper (about 7 or 8 years ago) where
somebody turn off SMF recording and saw no measureable difference in CPU
utilziation.
I wonder how they measured it?
Bob,
Thanks for the pointer, I'll go find that session, and check it out.
Dave
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Isn't there still some code in the system that uses the original DEB?
No
No (IBM-owned) system code uses CVTLINK or its DCB/DEB directly. When the
system sees CVTLINK it translates CVTLINK into ASSBDLCB - DLCBDCB@ .
Code stll running with the IPL-time LNKLST will of course access the
original DEB
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Darren Evans-Young
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Bruce Black wrote:
But Darrens issue is not the language, it is all the filters in place
at many subscribers locations which generate email back to Darren for
each
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget to add in the cost of the periodic IFASMDFP jobs that copy
the SMF data from the SYS1.MANx datasets
I make those IMP=5.
The cost is nothing, since I bought the machine for other work.
IFASMFDP fills in the
Darren,
Prior to this last upgrade when you viewed a post in the archvies, the
poster's name and subject name both linked to the previous post from
that poster or previous post on that subject. That no longer appears
to be the case. Is this something you can control?
When I start
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:OPEN will not set DCBDSORG.
:If it's 0?
No such thing. DCB macro requires it.
It and the MACRF are required to properly build the DCB and to get the correct
access methods loaded.
Just to be a bit pedantic, he could build his own DCB without using the
macro. In the
Hello, is it possible to do the following with DFSORT/ICETOOL:
Input1:
A1 X1
A1 X2
B1 X1
B1 Y1
Input2:
X1 ABC
X2 DEF
Y1 GHI
Expected output:
A1 X1 ABC
A1 X2 DEF
B1 X1 ABC
B1 Y1 GHI
I believe it will require multiple scans of Input2. Hope it is clear enough.
Thanks.
In a message dated 4/25/2006 8:02:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who knows how much collection costs?
There are three components of collection that cause overhead directly
attributable to SMF, but most of which is not measurable: (1) creation of
data
elements
You could simply code the DCB with DSORG, and at run-time, reinitialize
the DSORG field. Why would you want to hand-craft a control block?
Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/25/2006 08:58 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Hi,
I collect IBM documentation, conference proceedings, all sorts of odd
things and just now I am looking for some old SHARE proceedings on
CD-ROM.
I have all the new proceedings the ones you can find at the share.org
web site.
Seattle - March, 2006 New!
Boston - August, 2005
Anaheim -
In the case you mention the word was not offensive, even to a Nice Nelly, but
I could see where it could certainly trigger a spam filter.
Jon
snip
It is hard to avoid giving offense to these filters, and I don't thinlk we
should try to do so. I recently found that I was not receiving
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Overhead of SMF Records
I vaguly remember reading a paper (about 7 or 8 years ago)
In a message dated 4/25/2006 2:42:56 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wonder how they measured it?
With an hour-glass?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Roberto R. wrote on 04/25/2006 05:56:22 AM:
Hello, is it possible to do the following with DFSORT/ICETOOL:
Input1:
A1 X1
A1 X2
B1 X1
B1 Y1
Input2:
X1 ABC
X2 DEF
Y1 GHI
Expected output:
A1 X1 ABC
A1 X2 DEF
B1 X1 ABC
B1 Y1 GHI
I believe it will require multiple
Are you in a large shop now?
Approx 3600 MIPS.
How busy are your processors? In our
shop (where we like to run all the processors close to 100% all day),
We try, but our business is cyclic.
putting SMF dumps at the bottom of the totem pole would never work. You have
to be able to dump
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denis Metivier
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Tape channel program
I am looking after samples of tape channel programs. And
would like to
We are getting the above message sporadically on our TEST LPAR. I have searched
IBMLINK and had EMC check out the control unit and DASD. Might anyone know why
we are getting this error on the master console:
IEF196I IOS078I 0921,78,XCFAS, I/O TIMEOUT INTERVAL HAS BEEN EXCEEDED
IOS078I
We are getting the above message sporadically on our TEST LPAR. I have searched
IBMLINK and had EMC check out the control unit and DASD. Might anyone know why
we are getting this error on the master console:
IEF196I IOS078I 0921,78,XCFAS, I/O TIMEOUT INTERVAL HAS BEEN EXCEEDED
IOS078I
Cross posted to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE
OK, I've got a component trace of SYSOMVS and formatted via IPCS but
where are the trace entries documented/mapped? I've been looking
through TFM but can't find it.
Thanks all
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems Software
CIT Group
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to move a dataset from what appears to be an SMS volume to what
appears to be a non-SMS volume.
I get this message:
ADR440E (001)-RALLC(02), UNEXPECTED RETURN CODE FROM REALLOC MACRO:
00C0, WHILE PROCESSING DATA SET DB2WK8.DB2WK1.SDSNEXIT
I hope to bypass SMS just to allocate
Has anyone got this working with Top Secret???
We got a cookbook from CA outlining the steps but so far we
haven't successfully managed to retrieve any service.
Infer what you want about our Top Secret admins.
Alan
--
For
Hi
We got the new WebSphere Developer for z/Series with the C++ debug tool
We don't have currently WAS in the host, if some can tell me the minimum
required software in the z/OS
to use JES remote access and USS access
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Miklos Szigetvari
ISIS
How does one trace the execution of CSVLLIX1? LLA shows that the exit is
active, but when I attempt to trace via SLIP IF and GTFTRACE I don't get
any records in by trace dataset.
SLIP command is; SLIP SET,IF,ACTION=TRACE,PVTMOD=(CSVLLIX1,00,19A),END
And GTFTRACE is simple TRACE=SLIP
HI EVERYONE,
WE HAVE AN ATL 3590, AND ARE USING 3590 AND 3592 DRIVES,WITH 60 GB AND 300
GB CARTRIDGES TO BACKUP OUR DATA, IS THERE ANY SUITABLE PROGRAM TO STACK
DATA ON THESE CARTRIDGES AND ALSO USE THESE CARTRIDGES TO THEIR OPTIMUM
LEVEL, MEAN USE THEM 100%
ANY HELP SUGGESTIONS WILL BE
Did I read somewhere that z/os 1.7 or perhaps one of the new boxes
support adding LPAR's without a POR?
The business mission is a kilo boat load of Linux images, not real z/os
images. My knee jerk plan is to shrink a z/os image, and redistribute
the resources across a large number of small
You really don't want to build multiple lpars for the Linux images. You
really should run these images under VM. IBM has special VM pricing for
VM under an IFL.
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FRANKO DSOUZA
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: enterprise tape system 3590
HI EVERYONE,
WE HAVE AN ATL 3590, AND ARE USING 3590 AND 3592
I agree with Mark, but I think you are referring to reserved lpars - I
thing you have to
do a POR at least once to define them.
I tried to make a couple of ours that we no longer used reserved but it
meant taking
all the channel definitions away which seemed like a lot of work only to
have to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Adding LPARs without POR
Did I read somewhere that z/os 1.7 or perhaps one of the new boxes
support
I believe what you're referring to, adding LPARs dynamically, began with
the z890/z990 and z/OS 1.6.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
You can search the IBM-MAIN Archives one useful post there are many more
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9602L=ibm-mainP=R2I=1X=2A9667288
DCA53C9E4
Google tape stacking z/OS yields lots of hits.. Combine both and you
have a nice list to start and I expect you are about to be swarmed by
I want to pick up all needed service to do an apply check for a DT/2107
(DS8000).
What options do I need it the smpe jcl stream.
Is this considered a function.
Thanks.
-
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low
Howard,
You need to logon to IBMLINK, and go look at PSP at 2107device. This
will list all required maintenance for this box. You will then need to
order, and apply those fixes. To answer your question, no, it is not a
function.
Dave
Thank David.
I've aleady done this...got cum tapes, RSU tapes.etc. I think IBM is giving
me the run around on this one.
I'll check back with them.
Problem is I need all service relaive to all the software on my machine and I
some how can't seem to get that. During the apply
Neubert, Kevin (DIS) wrote:
I believe what you're referring to, adding LPARs dynamically, began with
the z890/z990 and z/OS 1.6.
Right software, right hardware, wrong function! The enhancement was not
to allow *adding* LPARs dynamically, the function was to allow
*renaming* LPARs
Check your program directories for details, but you probably want to install
FMID H002600 for JES remote access, and FMID H001600 for Remote System
Explorer, for z/OS data set and USS file access. For COBOL, PL/I, Assembler,
and EGL support, you'll want FMID HEDS500. Also check out the Websphere
Howard,
OK, so you have all your maintenance. Good, make sure it is all
received. Now, go to IBMLINK, and pull the PSP bucket( term for a
document that lists required maintenance) for that device type. In it,
it will have a list of all the required PTF's for that hardware. Take
that list,
Well, I guess that will have to do.
Any SWAG's on the MSU cost of an inactive IFL LPAR? I have four active
and one inactive now, all z/os. There are guesstimates of perhaps 3 or 4
hundred Linux images.
I know, I know. But management needs numbers, not emotions. In addition,
there are audit
The modern way to do this with minimal effort is by using the PSP
tool.
Enhanced Preventive Service Planning tool web site:
http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/390/psp_main.html
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers
Is there some document which does a compare and contrast between
WebSphere Developer and ISPF? Is is possible to totally replace ISPF
with WebSphere Developer? I mean for programmers. I realize that there
are ISPF applications which are not accessable via WebSphere Developer
at this time (such as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding LPARs without POR
Well, I guess that will have to do.
Any SWAG's on the MSU cost of
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:49:33 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neubert, Kevin (DIS) wrote:
I believe what you're referring to, adding LPARs dynamically, began with
the z890/z990 and z/OS 1.6.
Right software, right hardware, wrong function! The enhancement was not
to allow *adding*
Alan -
We have just started to invstigate the use of SMP/E Internet Service
Retrieval and we also use Top Secret. Now you have me scared! Exactly
what is it that is failing? Can you share any messages? What is the name
of the CA cookbook and why is a cookbook necessary? Isn't SMP/E
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:16:28 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote:
There are guesstimates of perhaps 3 or 4 hundred Linux images.
...
In addition, there are audit pressures to put each application instance
on its own server.
Okay there's your problem: You CANNOT have anywhere near 3 or 4 HUNDRED
LPARs on
And you should definately join the IBMVM and Linux-390 lists.
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=ibmvm
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-VM
/Tom Kern
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:35:25 -0500, Tom Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:16:28 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Thank David.
I've aleady done this...got cum tapes, RSU tapes.etc. I
think IBM is giving me the run around on this one.
I'll check back with them.
Problem is I need all
Well, sometimes left field is a good place to be. It all depends ;-)
I once recall a 'cost' of a few percent of the box in hypervisor
overhead for a defined LPAR, active or not. IIRC, the ROT was 2-5%. And
I am talking several hundred active LPARs.
I can believe things have changed. I can
Thanks Dave,
Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howard,
OK, so you have all your maintenance. Good, make sure it is all
received. Now, go to IBMLINK, and pull the PSP bucket( term for a
document that lists required maintenance) for that device type. In it,
it will have a list of all
I knew I was asking the right people. I get good quality answers even
when I ask poor questions.
Thanks!!
Hal.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
McKown, John wrote:
Is there some document which does a compare and contrast between
WebSphere Developer and ISPF? Is is possible to totally replace ISPF
with WebSphere Developer? I mean for programmers. I realize that there
are ISPF applications which are not accessable via WebSphere Developer
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/25/2006
12:47:41 PM:
How does one trace the execution of CSVLLIX1? LLA shows that the exit is
active, but when I attempt to trace via SLIP IF and GTFTRACE I don't get
any records in by trace dataset.
SLIP command is; SLIP
Richard Tsujimoto wrote:
You could simply code the DCB with DSORG, and at run-time, reinitialize
the DSORG field. Why would you want to hand-craft a control block?
Who said I wanted to do so? Shmuel asked what would happen if a DCB had
a zero DSORG. Binyamin pointed out that the DCB MACRO
In addition, there are audit pressures to put each application instance on its
own server.
With z/VM and IFL's, you can do just that.
But, does your auditor consider each virtual instance a new server?
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/25/2006
09:24:37 AM:
IBM has some undocumented monitor call
instructions inside the I/O first level interrupt handler for
instrumentation
purposes. Maybe they also have some way to measure the overhead of
building an
McKown, John wrote:
[...]
IMO, using LPARs for Linux is not a wise decision. z/VM is the only real
way to manage a boat load of images. z/VM manages better than PR/SM,
again IMO.
Why ?
IMHO it *depends*. Is it so common to run few z/OS LPARs and hundreds
Linux images ? I know datacenters
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding LPARs without POR
snip
Why ?
IMHO it *depends*. Is it so common to run few z/OS LPARs and
Hal Merritt wrote:
Any SWAG's on the MSU cost of an inactive IFL LPAR?
Zero.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Mautalen Juan Guillermo wrote:
I have been reading SDSF books, and i still have some BIG doubts.
1) This is unrelated to the migration itself, but i wonder where does
SDSF run. I do not see any adress space related to SDSF...does it run in
each user adress space?
The server runs in its own
In compliance with our current Disaster Recovery procedures, I've been
able to use the following JCL to backup the RMM CDS and Journal files
directly to tape as the last step in a larger JCL stream that backups up
all of our essential catalog files and such. Now I'm in need of JCL to
restore the
One of the datacenters is using Linux under IFL. 2-4 images. Is it really cost
effective to buy z/VM for this poor z/800 machine ? Is it really needed at all
?
I think it is.
4 images isn't worth $125,000 USD for an IFL.
I don't think you can drive the IFL very high with just that few.
-
Any SWAG's on the MSU cost of an inactive IFL LPAR?
The specialty engines cost $125K USD each; there are no software costs, yet.
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
One of the datacenters is using Linux under IFL. 2-4 images. Is it really cost
effective to buy z/VM for this poor z/800 machine ? Is it really needed at all ?
I think it is.
4 images isn't worth $125,000 USD for an IFL.
How do you work that out? Surely the number of
Has any one put on the PTFs? Any experience good or bad with their use?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Heads Up - LE PE
Peter Relson of z/OS Core Technology Design wrote:
No (IBM-owned) system code uses CVTLINK or its DCB/DEB
directly. When the system sees CVTLINK it translates
CVTLINK into ASSBDLCB - DLCBDCB@ .
Code stll running with the IPL-time LNKLST will of course
access the original DEB when using
On Jan 17, 2005 Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
I have the following record layout:
First_name; Last_name; text_data; year.
The fields are variable in length, the record format VB. In fact the
data are imported from PC world.
I want to sort them by lastname, then by firstname.
Is it possible to use
For what it's worth, and I'm sure this can start a great debate, I allow the
SMF
processes to take what they need to get in, finish what they need to, and
get out.
I have seen customer sites move SMF out of SYSTEM, and have MANx Dumps run
at lower importance. I generally recommend giving it all
Tony Harminc wrote:
I may misunderstand what you are saying... What is the correct way to load a
LNKLST module into a storage location of one's own choosing using ADDR= on
the LOAD macro? LOAD with ADDR= requires a non-zero DCB=, so I have been
using the CVTLINK DCB, but I'm presumably missing
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/25/2006
11:30:56 AM:
We are not quite at the level of kill the system rather than run without
an SMF audit trail (wait state D0D) but we address any SMF data loss
with steps taken to prevent it from recurring.
I had never
Denis Metivier wrote:
More, I'll like to know the syntax of the Load Display
Mount CCW used by MVS for tape mounting/unmounting.
This code's for CMS, but it's short and simple to read.
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/read?fn=PANL3480ft=NOTEline=1
How do you work that out?
$125K is what an IFL costs.
Surely the number of Linux images is
irrelevant, the only real purpose of an IFL is to reduce SW costs when
you have other LPARS with z/OS etc...
No. There is more than that.
LINUX on any z-box still is 'free'.
The IFL just gives a better
I guess some IBM developers have a sense of humor after all.
I always thought they did.
Remember the prefix for SMS is IGD, and the main programme is called IGDZILLA.
I, Godzilla
-
-teD
O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!
Pat,
I'm copying what came into my reader. Did you hit the wrong button
somewhere. I can't see anything new.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, 24 April, 2006 10:57 PM
Ted,
How do you work that out?
$125K is what an IFL costs.
I wasn't referring to the purchase cost, I meant how do you calulate
that 4 images isn't worth $125,000 USD for an IFL. i.e when does it
become worth it?
Surely the number of Linux images is
irrelevant, the only real purpose
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Hunter Cobb
Sent: Dienstag, 25. April 2006 19:42
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WebSphere Developer for z/Series
Check your program directories for details, but you probably want
By default the server is assumed to be named 'SDSF'. You can use a
different name or run multiple SDSF servers--each with its own name, of
course--to access different JES2 MASs. From the SDSF manual for 1.7:
3.3 Accessing the server
When the user accesses SDSF, the SDSF client attempts to
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:37:11 +0200, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I'm copying what came into my reader. Did you hit the wrong button
somewhere. I can't see anything new.
...
I use the web interface to IBM-Main. This has recently been restructured,
and has the Quote Original Message
Jim Mulder wrote:
[D0D wait state code for the DOD]
I guess some IBM developers have a sense of humor after all.
Any company that allows developers to ship macros named $DILBERT and
$DOGBERT (JES2), and a module named GIMISEX (SMP/E) is surely not without a
sense of humour. And then from the
IIRC the continued to cut RMF records.
Paul Gillis wrote:
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
I vaguly remember reading a paper (about 7 or 8 years ago) where
somebody turn off SMF recording and saw no measureable difference in
CPU utilziation.
I wonder how they measured it?
Regards, Paul
No, however it can be a NTP server.
nlehrer wrote:
can z/os get its time from an NTP server?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Franco,
Sam did a wonderful job giving you the different post-creation stacking
options (gotten to be a real crowded field) and also the different
virtual-tape solutions (always a very good method to fully utilize the high
capacity cartridges).
You never mentioned the tape management system you
At 00:00 + on 04/25/2006, Ted MacNEIL wrote about Re: Overhead of
SMF Records:
I always thought they did.
Remember the prefix for SMS is IGD, and the main programme is called IGDZILLA.
I, Godzilla
If SMS's prefix was IMG, they could have named the main module as
IMGOJIRA (I'm GOJIRA -
Try http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2C840/17.4?DT=20050714162634
As you're using DSS, try http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2C840/17.4.6
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:47:14 -0700, Hjelm, Norm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In compliance with our
91 matches
Mail list logo
