On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 9:16:51 PM UTC-6, Gunn Quznetsov wrote:
>
> Dear Dr. Alan Grayson ,
>
> No SUSY, No AXION, No WIMP, No HIGGS, No BIG BANG...
>
> Please, read it:
> https://vixra.org/pdf/2003.0448v1.pdf
>
> Regarda,
> Dr. Gunn
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvHalv2f5oM
>
I've as
Dear Dr. Alan Grayson ,
No SUSY, No AXION, No WIMP, No HIGGS, No BIG BANG...
Please, read it:https://vixra.org/pdf/2003.0448v1.pdf
Regarda,Dr. Gunnhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvHalv2f5oM
On Sunday, April 26, 2020, 01:33:12 AM GMT+3, Alan Grayson
wrote:
On Sunday, January 6, 2019
The latest method's not very different from what you imagined as
"measuring the shadow cast" except they shoot electrons, not photons, at
the protons.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269303015387?via%3Dihub
https://arxiv.org/pdf/nucl-th/0508037.pdf
They're measuring a c
On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 5:36:01 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/25/2020 3:33 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:53:52 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>>
>> To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
>> make a photon with a wavelength s
On 4/25/2020 3:33 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:53:52 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
make a photon with a wavelength so short it can measure the Planck
length it will have so much mass-energy
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:53:52 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>
> To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
> make a photon with a wavelength so short it can measure the Planck
> length it will have so much mass-energy that it will fold spacetime
> around it and be
On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 10:17:57 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Feb 2019, at 10:22, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:53:01 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 19:09, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> As I have said, I am l
> On 9 Feb 2019, at 10:22, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:53:01 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 19:09, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> As I have said, I am language-oriented. What this means is that I say that
>> science (from that p
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:53:01 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Feb 2019, at 19:09, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
> As I have said, I am language-oriented. What this means is that I say that
> science (from that perspective) is a collection of domain-specific
> languages - gene
> On 4 Feb 2019, at 19:09, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 1 Feb 2019, at 19:16, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:41:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Feb 2019, a
On Monday, February 4, 2019 at 10:06:45 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 19:16, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:41:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1 Feb 2019, at 14:52, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 1,
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 19:16, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:41:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 1 Feb 2019, at 14:52, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 7:19:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 Jan 2019, a
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 2:56:45 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/2/2019 11:04 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
> >
> > "Experiential atoms" are sort of " just words" - like "atoms" was just
> > a word to the Atomists of ancient Greece. And then a lot of people
> > ignored them. Hopefully
On 2/2/2019 11:04 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
"Experiential atoms" are sort of " just words" - like "atoms" was just
a word to the Atomists of ancient Greece. And then a lot of people
ignored them. Hopefully things will go better in this round of history.
- pt
Democritus didn't just define
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:48:00 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/2019 10:58 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:54:15 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/2019 5:52 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>> In any case, one of the "micropsychists" has a ne
On 2/1/2019 10:58 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:54:15 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 2/1/2019 5:52 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
In any case, one of the "micropsychists" has a new paper just out:
"According to the *fusion* view ... when micro- or protocons
On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:58:14 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:54:15 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/2019 5:52 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>> In any case, one of the "micropsychists" has a new paper just out:
>>
>>
>> "According to the
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:54:15 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/2019 5:52 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
> In any case, one of the "micropsychists" has a new paper just out:
>
>
> "According to the *fusion* view ... when micro- or protoconscious
> entities come together in the right wa
On 2/1/2019 5:52 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
In any case, one of the "micropsychists" has a new paper just out:
"According to the *fusion* view ... when micro- or protoconscious
entities come together in the right way, they fuse or 'blend' together
to form a single unified consciousness. ..."
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 9:41:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 14:52, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 7:19:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:40, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 31
> On 1 Feb 2019, at 14:52, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 7:19:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:40, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 6:28:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 Jan 2019
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 7:19:00 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:40, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 6:28:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:14, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, Januar
> On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:40, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 6:28:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:14, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 5:45:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>> As I try
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 6:28:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:14, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 5:45:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As I try to solve the mind-body problem in the Mechanist frame, I cannot
>>
> On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:14, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 5:45:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 29 Jan 2019, at 15:03, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 5:30:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 28 Jan 2
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 5:45:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2019, at 15:03, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 5:30:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28 Jan 2019, at 15:07, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January
> On 29 Jan 2019, at 15:03, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 5:30:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 28 Jan 2019, at 15:07, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 6:27:37 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2019
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 at 5:30:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2019, at 15:07, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 6:27:37 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2019, at 14:53, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 25
> On 28 Jan 2019, at 15:07, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 6:27:37 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 25 Jan 2019, at 14:53, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:27:44 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 Jan 2019,
On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 6:27:37 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Jan 2019, at 14:53, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:27:44 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24 Jan 2019, at 15:19, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 2
> On 25 Jan 2019, at 14:53, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:27:44 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 24 Jan 2019, at 15:19, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 7:14:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 Jan 201
On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 1:09:05 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 7:19:05 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 5:01:02 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 4:54:58 PM UT
On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 7:19:05 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 5:01:02 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 4:54:58 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:25:59 PM
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 5:01:02 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 4:54:58 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:25:59 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:06:09 AM
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 4:54:58 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:25:59 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:06:09 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:48:38 AM UT
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:25:59 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:06:09 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:48:38 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 2:03:10 PM UTC-6,
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 10:14:24 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:59 AM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
> > *I shouldn't say (if will jinx me!) but I've never gotten a flu shot
>> and I haven't gotten the flu in over 40 years.*
>
>
> It's odd, no invention in human hist
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:06:09 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:48:38 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 2:03:10 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 12:57:00 PM UTC-6,
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 10:14:24 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:59 AM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
> > *I shouldn't say (if will jinx me!) but I've never gotten a flu shot
>> and I haven't gotten the flu in over 40 years.*
>
>
> It's odd, no invention in human hi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:59 AM Philip Thrift wrote:
> *I shouldn't say (if will jinx me!) but I've never gotten a flu shot and
> I haven't gotten the flu in over 40 years.*
It's odd, no invention in human history has saved more lives than vaccines
and yet from the day the first one was invente
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 6:27:44 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2019, at 15:19, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 7:14:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23 Jan 2019, at 19:01, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, Januar
> On 24 Jan 2019, at 19:57, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 8:59:42 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 5:54:46 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
>
>
>
> My point is that in physics what might be called a halting conditio
> On 24 Jan 2019, at 15:19, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 7:14:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 23 Jan 2019, at 19:01, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 5:52:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Jan
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:48:38 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 2:03:10 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 12:57:00 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 8:59:42 AM UTC-
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 2:03:10 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 12:57:00 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 8:59:42 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 5:54:46 AM UTC-6
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 12:57:00 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 8:59:42 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 5:54:46 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My point is that in physics what
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 8:59:42 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 5:54:46 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> My point is that in physics what might be called a halting condition is
>> an attractor point or limit cycle. Equilibrium i
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 5:54:46 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:49:12 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno
On Thursday, January 24, 2019 at 7:14:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jan 2019, at 19:01, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 5:52:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>> One of the oddest of th
> On 24 Jan 2019, at 12:54, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:49:12 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 21 Ja
> On 23 Jan 2019, at 19:01, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 5:52:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>> One of the oddest of things is when physicists use the language of (various)
>> theories of physi
On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:49:12 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2019, at 00:17, Lawrence Crowell
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 5:52:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
> One of the oddest of things is when physicists use the language of
> (various) theories of physics to express what can or cannot be the case.
> It's just a lang
> On 22 Jan 2019, at 01:49, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 21 Jan 2019, at 00:17, Lawrence Crowell >
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, January 20,
On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21 Jan 2019, at 00:17, Lawrence Crowell
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:16:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
On Monday, January 21, 2019 at 5:09:50 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Jan 2019, at 00:17, Lawrence Crowell > wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:16:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 Jan 2019, at 01:42, Lawrence Crowell
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2
> On 21 Jan 2019, at 00:17, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:16:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 19 Jan 2019, at 01:42, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 0
On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 9:16:01 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Jan 2019, at 01:42, Lawrence Crowell > wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 09:22, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 7
> On 19 Jan 2019, at 11:36, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 2:36:23 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 18 Jan 2019, at 15:44, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Jan 201
> On 19 Jan 2019, at 01:42, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 09:22, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:25:16 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 2:36:23 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2019, at 15:44, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 21:02, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January
> On 18 Jan 2019, at 15:44, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jan 2019, at 21:02, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/17/2019 12:2
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 6:31:06 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2019, at 09:22, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:25:16 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM wrote:
>>
>> *> How does one calculate Planck length usin
On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 7:36:34 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2019, at 21:02, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/17/2019 12:22 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> *Later I'll post some que
> On 17 Jan 2019, at 21:02, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/2019 12:22 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Later I'll post some questions I have about your derivation of the Planck
>> length, but for now here's a phi
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/17/2019 12:22 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> *Later I'll post some questions I have about your derivation of the Planck
> length, but for now here's a philosophical question; Is there any
> difference between t
On 1/17/2019 12:22 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*Later I'll post some questions I have about your derivation of the
Planck length, but for now here's a philosophical question; Is there
any difference between the claim that space is discrete, from the
claim or conjecture that we cannot in
> On 17 Jan 2019, at 09:22, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:25:16 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM > wrote:
>
> > How does one calculate Planck length using the fundamental constants G, h,
> > and c, and having calculated it, how
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 2:22:29 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:25:16 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM wrote:
>>
>> *> How does one calculate Planck length using the fundamental constants
>>> G, h, and c, and h
On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:25:16 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM > wrote:
>
> *> How does one calculate Planck length using the fundamental constants G,
>> h, and c, and having calculated it, how does one show that measuring a
>> length that small with photons
This is the basic argument. The Compton wavelength or equivalently the de
Broglie wavelength with v = c is equal to the Schwarzschild radius. That is
how to derive the Planck length. The argument that nothing smaller exists
just means the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can't isolate something
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:03 AM wrote:
*> How does one calculate Planck length using the fundamental constants G,
> h, and c, and having calculated it, how does one show that measuring a
> length that small with photons of the same approximate wave length, would
> result in a black hole? TIA, AG*
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 11:39:03 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/6/2019 1:56 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 7:53:52 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>> To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
>> make a photon with a wavelength
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 2:59:39 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> There is a related concept, the Planck Mass that also involves the 3 most
> fundamental constants in nature, the speed of light the Planck constant and
> the Gravitational constant. If you take the Planck energy
> (c^5*h/2*PI*
On 1/6/2019 1:56 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 7:53:52 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
make a photon with a wavelength so short it can measure the Planck
length it will have so much mass-
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 7:53:52 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
> To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
> make a photon with a wavelength so short it can measure the Planck
> length it will have so much mass-energy that it will fold spacetime
> around it and becom
There is a related concept, the Planck Mass that also involves the 3 most
fundamental constants in nature, the speed of light the Planck constant and
the Gravitational constant. If you take the Planck energy
(c^5*h/2*PI*G)^1/2 and confine it in a box one Planck length
(G*h/2*PI*c^3)^1/2 on a side i
To measure small things you need comparably short wavelengths. If you
make a photon with a wavelength so short it can measure the Planck
length it will have so much mass-energy that it will fold spacetime
around it and become a black hole...so you won't be able to use it to
measure anything.
78 matches
Mail list logo
