Hi,
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 15:29 +0100, iwkse wrote:
Such feature is useful when the user has a really high number of fonts
cause loading all them slow down whole gimp at the start.
Why not just fix the slow startup instead? If your copy of fontconfig
would work correctly, GIMP would only have
Hi,
over the last days I have tried to get the new print plug-in into a
state that is good enough for the 2.4 release. There are however still a
number of issues. I will paste from bug #387604 because it makes more
sense to discuss this here than in Bugzilla:
Three minor issues:
- It comes
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:29 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Yes, the banding comes from the fact that the plug-in paints the
image in stripes of tile height. It does that to avoid having to
allocate memory for the whole image. I hope that we can find a way
to fix this.
How
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 18:52 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I already did so (and checked again just now). All but one of them are
applicable as far as I can tell.
I've changed the tip based on your suggestion.
Actually, I was hoping that we could get rid of some tips for 2.4. In my
opinion
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 15:37 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
I don't see why the default settings for new installs should have any affect
on the migration of an existing installation. A new install will wind up with
rc files with all the default settings.
No, it won't, for purely technical
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 21:08 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
Currently, I've deleted 3, merged 1, and fixed 1 tip.
Please attach the diff to the bug-report so that I can review and apply
it later today.
and on another check
You can drag a layer from the Layers dialog and drop it onto
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:37 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Regarding the status bar messages and the string freeze, I would
like to announce that I am planning to add a few more messages,
mostly for the transform tools. I am planning to work on that next
week.
Ok. I will probably
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:54 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
And a few RFEs which would be needed to get the print dialog to
functionality comparable to the existing gimp-print plug-in.
I don't know whether these belong to gtkprint or gimp:
- No way to adjust margins
- Page Setup should be
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 11:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am an artist and am creating a workshop for other artists who would
like to use GIMP to create digital artwork.
I am charging $26.99 for this workshop. I would like to donate a
portion of the proceeds to the conference.
If
Hi,
I am picking up on a mail that is more than a month old, but the issue
is still unresolved. Let me bring it to your attention again.
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 21:59 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list
I posted earlier. We
Hi,
if we want to get 2.4 out soon, and I think that's our intention, then
we need to enter string freeze at some point. I'd like to suggest that
we go into a tentative string freeze right now. That means that no
string changes are allowed unless they fix bugs. A misspelled or
grammatically
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 23:26 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
If you feel that it's too early for a string freeze or have larger
string changes pending, speak up now!
If you want me to sort out and simplify the crop and
selection options berfore christmas, then I need the freedom
to
Hi,
thanks for looking at the plug-in. It would help a lot if we could split
your list into problems of the Print plug-in and problems of the
GtkPrint API. The latter would have to be reported against GTK+.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 11:15 +0200, Aurimas Juska wrote:
Start: Image/Filters/Web/Save for Web...
Wouldn't it be better placed into the File menu?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 14:58 +0200, Aurimas Juska wrote:
Of course, File menu would be better but I don't know how to make Save
for Web... appear after Save as Copy...
Register into Image/File/Save.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 01:52 -0800, Paul Gnuyen wrote:
I don't know what full specifications look like for tools in the gimp
but here's a shot.
Usually you would start by explaining what the tool is good for. Perhaps
explaining some typical usage scenarios.
Sven
Hi,
a month ago I posted about 2.4 showstoppers. Let's have a look at that
list again and try to see what still needs to be done.
Finish rectangle tools
Peter started to discuss this with Karine, Bill, Mitch and me. But Bill
told us that he won't have time to do any changes. So we are still
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:16 +0100, Bart wrote:
I'm writing an extension for gedit for easy generation of scripts (scm)
for the Script-Fu. I know gedit has a Scheme highlighter but i'm on it
extending it heavily for GIMP. I will make a tag and snippet list
available too.
Why don't you
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 01:54 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
I will start trying out the new system. The main downside I see at the moment
is that of increased mouse mileage from needing to move between the top of
the
toolbox dialog to the bottom of the Layer/Channels/Paths dialog to alter
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 15:28 -0700, dorai iyer wrote:
I am new to the world of gimp and am interested in it because of its
ability to do layers. My work is mostly related to microscopy. I tried
using the unit editor however, i could not get it to calibrate the
image for the different
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:13 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
I'm not Kevin, but I had the same reaction he did. In my defense
(and maybe Kevin's), when the toolbox selectors disappeared, the
new dialogs didn't automatically make themselves visible, so it
just looked like a bug that they were
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:47 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
Are we intentionally not having the version number in the art?
Why should it be there? See http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpSplashScreen
for rules for splash screens.
Sven
___
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 15:18 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
I prefer to have these showing in the toolbox. When I lost them a some time
ago after a cvs up, the first thing I did was find out where they went and
how
to get them back.
You could at least have tried to live without them for a
Hi,
to avoid misunderstandings, I would like to point out that I very much
welcome the discussion about the defaults for 2.4. But I think that we
should better have it on the gimp-users list. I don't think that
developers are good at doing user interface decisions. Most of us (and
that includes
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:31 -0500, Adrian Likins wrote:
And on the subject of defaults for 2.4, I wonder if it would be useful
to include a set of default tool option presets for each tool?
I can't think of any useful presets right now and I think we have loads
of more important things
Hi Adrian,
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 21:24 -0500, Adrian Likins wrote:
Yup, I'll take this and start putting together a set of brushes.
will you also address http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322176 ?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 15:34 -0500, Adrian Likins wrote:
5. It might be nice to have the stock round/square brushes be dynamic
brushes by default. (If I understand correctly, theres a small
concern that this might break some existing scripts?)
This has been discussed
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 10:54 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
What about:
/* GIMP - The GNU Image Manipulation Program */
I'll go with that version then and do the change.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 18:36 -0500, Adrian Likins wrote:
1. In the toolbox, the fg/bg color, and brush/patter/gradient boxes
should be on.
The brush/patter/gradient boxes are pointless as these can be accessed
from the respective tool options. I haven't been using those for years.
The
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 10:19 -0800, Paul Gnuyen wrote:
Implementing this feature as requested, I find that there appears to be
no way for a tool to handle a double click event as it is eaten further
up. Is handling double click impossible from a tool? I currently have
the tool
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 15:09 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
(forwarding this accidentally mistargeted mail)
I think you meant to send it to the gimp-user list though...
CMYK I find most unintuitive.
The purpose of the CMYK selector is not to allow intuitive color
selection. It's meant for
Hi,
I'd like to do the following change to the comment at the top of all
source files in the GIMP tree:
-/* The GIMP -- an image manipulation program
+/* GNU Image Manipulation Program
Any objections?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 14:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm writing is straightforward- it's a linear (i.e. one-dimensional)
unsharp mask. (I'm probably not the first to do this, but it's a good
learning opportunity, and it confirmed my hunch that it would work better
against
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 12:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I want to annotate the PREVIEW (*without* modifying the
original image's drawable) using gimp_pencil(). That requires a
GimpDrawable, but rgn_out- i.e. the processed pixels which are used to
create the preview's
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's exactly right; I realise that my original question got bogged down
with specifics- sorry.
Put simply, I want to use the high-level Drawable functions to draw a line or
arrow on the preview window. The tutorial example
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:11 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Make full compilation. Then, after, changing the plug-in file, remove
relevant .o file and rerun 'make make install' that will recompile
the plugin again.
But this will take forever. Instead, say your plug-in is called
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 15:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please, make code readable with explicit variable names and named
constants. Lines like the following are very economical on file size but
very wasteful on human time for anyone who did not write the code:
dv = du + w[i];
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 22:09 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
I thought I'd give a shot at adding spot colors to the GIMP TIFF
implementation.
Nice.
If I understand, I need to look at /gimp/plug-ins/common/tiff.c and
add some of the functionality found in /gimp/app/xcf/(?)
(specifically,
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 13:00 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
Hi - My name is Chris Mohler. I'm not a hard-core programmer, but
have some experience with C and Python. I've recently set about to
assembling a prepress environment with OSS tools. Of course GIMP is a
cornerstone of the project,
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 12:26 +0100, Nils Nordén wrote:
I looked up some stuff to really understand what flow does, and
according to http://www.mambo.net/as/view/159 it seems to be
time-based on how rapidly the paint will flow out of the cursor.
Now, what I discovered is that the Airbrush
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when you said your list of stoppers was open for discussion I though you
meant is was open for discussion.
Open for discussion on the mailing list, yes. But if you send your mail
to me alone (which is what the mail header
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the library refered to above? Can someone suggest something I
can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this
system?
There's 'ldd' to check what libs a binary is picking up. That should
help
Moin,
slowly but steadily the state of GIMP 2.3 is reaching a point where it
can be released as 2.4. I would like to point out some showstoppers in
the hope that we can get some help with them. There is also the list of
bugs on the 2.4 milestone in Bugzilla and this mail somewhat overlaps
with
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:51 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
I would strongly recommend work out common terminology with developers
of other open source projects instead. Having uniform terminology is
one of the reasons the OpenIcc project [1] exists: commercial
applications fail to
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 07:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print
some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install
on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors.
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 21:05 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
If by them you are referring to developers of Scribus, ICC-Examin,
LProf etc. and technical specialists of Lexmark, HP and Adobe, then,
most likely, yes -- they can. If you are referring to somebody else
from that list, then
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:02 -0800, Hal V. Engel wrote:
Also some time ago I put together a fairly detailed description of what was
needed and where this should be located in the GIMP menu structure that I
submitted to this list. There have been similar proposals from others as
well.
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list
I posted earlier. We need to check if the new print plug-in is ready for
release. Since I don't use GTK+ 2.10 yet, I didn't get a chance to have
a
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:02 -0800, Hal V. Engel wrote:
The last version I tried is 2.3.12 and selecting profiles was by file name.
Most other CM aware software including (but not limited to) photoshop, The
Windows Color control panel applet, cinepaint, Krita and LProf (should Scibus
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
The gimp-print/guten-print plug-in is developed by different people
and is not at all coupled to the GIMP release cycles. We should
however consider to make the print plug-in that's being shipped
with GIMP aware of
Moin,
just a quick note to inform you that the usability weekend was a great
success. Based on workspace observations and interviews that Kamila,
Ellen and Peter did over the last weeks, and supplemented by feedback
from the GIMP documentation team and GIMP user support, we managed to
come up
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 21:41 +0100, MM Benya wrote:
The only thing I would like to add is the possibility to pan the image freely
within the image window, not only up to the image boundaries. That also makes
painting a lot more comfortable.
I am currently working on this. There's a bug
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 17:49 +0100, MM Benya wrote:
I didn't know that you could do that. I know that you can access the
Brushes and Tool Options dialogs via
shortcuts, but you still need to have 3 dialogs open if you want to
change opacity, spacing and radius of a
brush. I put all the
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 23:57 +0100, cedric GEMY wrote:
What about giving the possibility to dock windows in the main picture one ?
Cedric, you should know that we have discussed this already every so often
and that it is considered for implementation when 2.4 is out. What's the point
of
Hi,
we are asking for a volunteer to fix the Plug-In Browser for several
years now. The GimpBrowser widget in libgimpwidgets was designed
especially to allow this sort of search interface and all that needs to
be done is to port the Plug-In Browser to it and to extend it a little
so that you can
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 14:46 -0300, Dalai Felinto wrote:
1) The CROP tool have been changed. The question is: if I begin my
selection outside the canvas, just a black square is show. Why not
consider the limits as the starter parameter? In terms of usability,
anyone who came from others
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a fresh install off cvs and the scoll wheel is no longer
configured to zoom. It does image scrolling as before.
I said Ctrl-Wheel, didn't I? And please, let's not start the discussion
again whether Wheel should zoom
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 21:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also if you dabble around in the config options you can make gimp zoom off
the mouse scroll à la GoogleEarth. This may be closer to what you want.
There's no need to configure anything for that. This is by default bound
to
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:01 -0700, Scott wrote:
I have yet to hear any feedback regarding my idea of allowing the
options for a tool like the current crop to be customised by the
user to make it do what s/he wants it to do as a normal case.
GIMP allows you to configure the default values
Hi,
I would like to let you give you some update on the OpenUsability
sponsored student project that we announced in August. Here's the
announcement again in case you lost the URL:
http://www.gimp.org/announcements/open-usability-gimp.html
During the application period that lasted until the 10th
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 12:16 -0600, Scott wrote:
aclocal:configure.in:416: warning: macro `AM_PATH_GTK_2_0' not found in
library
WARNING: You have disabled gtk-doc.
As a result, you will not be able to generate the API
documentation and 'make dist' will not work.
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 11:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conclusion: how about giving it a meaningful label rather than
. Tear off would be enough to raise the curiosity and once clicked this
excellent feature would be imediately available to all users.
Suggest that to
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 20:21 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
Hokay, but before we start there, is there a particular outcome
which GIMP wants from the discussion? Shaded bar instead of
dash-dash? Tool-tips? Something else? Something specific?
I don't see any need for a change here. IMO the
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A short helpful text item like tear-off would not take make the menu a
single pixel larger nor would it clutter the menu more than a
meainingless line of hyphens.
Yes, it would. It would distract the user's view from the
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 08:42 +0700, Khoem Sokhem wrote:
Yes, Now I am in Khmer translation team. But for this I did not use CVS,
I just download and then translate on PO files.
All PO files for Gimp were translated into Khmer, and I want my
translations are in Gimp server.
There should
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:48 +0700, Khoem Sokhem wrote:
I am Khoem Sokhem is a translation coordinator for Cambodia (Khmer), Now
I finished translating Gimp into Khmer and I want to build it and then
make documentation on how to use Gimp.
Could someone point me how to build it?
Not
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 11:42 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
I tried using the Script-Fu scripts and immediately ran in to a minor problem.
SIOD uses 'the-environment' where TinyScheme uses 'current-environment'.
I ran into this problem as well. On one of my machines, the script
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 11:42 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
My source tree of CVS GIMP now contains a Tiny-Fu'd version of Script-Fu. The
changes are available as patch files ready to be reviewed. I am now waiting on
a final ok before the changes will be commited to CVS.
Sven
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:29 +, Richard Hirner wrote:
Related to bug #157880:
As far as I have seen, there are 3 methods for recent file lists in GIMP 2.3:
1) ~/.recently-used
2) ~/.gimp-2.3/documents
3) GtkRecentManager (new with Gtk 2.10)
Is this correct? What is the
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 14:40 -0400, Louis Desjardins wrote:
As I am getting the sponsors in for this event, I need to know (or at
least have a fair idea) of how many people from the GIMP's devel team
will be travelling to Montreal and in the need of sponsorship for travel
expenses
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 03:19 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
The demand for a way of combining various text colors and fonts,
along with other features in gimp text is high - even I myself need
these features a lot.
So, several months ago I started a plug-in to work around
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 19:55 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
You suggested moving Script-Fu (and pygimp) in to a module outside of the
GIMP
source tree in 2004.
Well, that was two years ago and lots of people have expressed their
opinion that splitting up the gimp tree into stand-alone
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:10 -0700, Saul Goode wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow
that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be
possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu
explicitely, but otherwise
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:07 -0700, Saul Goode wrote:
I am unaware of any PDB function that would permit and would be
interested in any input as to how this might be accomplished --
including which code in the core I might avail if I were to create such
a PDB function.
The undo
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:54 +1000, Williams, Andrew wrote:
With some difficulty I built Gimp 2.3.7 with Python using MinGW on Win
XP. Make and make install completed without error.
Why would you waste your time building such an outdated version of GIMP
2.3?
Sven
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 00:16 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
someone could review the strings
Hi,
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:10 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
From my point of view, Tiny-Fu is now ready to replace Script-Fu and I
would like to encourage everybody to make the switch so that we can
fix any remaining bugs. Considering that Tiny-Fu solves some real
problems (i18n), the
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:36 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Does reviewing mean that someone goes through scripts, marks forgotten
messages and err... unmarks those that should not be translated?
Sure, I might have forgotten a message or two. But the main point of
such a review is that
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:02 -0700, NoFirstName NoLastName wrote:
I've copied the output below. Gimp 1.2 is crashing
with the same error, but at a different point;
You didn't even show us the error message yet. The one you included in
the title doesn't originate from gimp but from the
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 23:56 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
mitch wrote:
I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that
can happen when clicking the image to the image window's statusbar,
using the new gimp_statusbar_push_temp() API.
I will have to see how this works in
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 07:23 -0700, Saul Goode wrote:
To a large extent, all operations in the Layers menu do not honor
selections. The notable exceptions are:
Transparency-Color To Alpha
Transparency-Semi-flatten
Transparency-Threshold Alpha
Transform-Arbitrary Rotate
These are
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I dont
think that makes sense to the user.
Well, we can't really decide that without doing
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I pull
up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling. Now I
dont necessarily want the same value but one thing it's sure I dont need
Hi Yosh,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 01:50 -0700, Manish Singh wrote:
One really should evaluate emails on the actual *content*, and
not what the From address says. There are several active contributors
who do not use gimp.org addresses, assuming their comments should have
less weight is rather
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 13:30 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
These informational messages would be displayed in the status bar without
the warning icon that is currently used (we could use some info icon
although using no icon is probably better if we want the warnings to be
noticed easily).
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 22:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think technical difficulties of implementation need to be separated from
UI discussion until the value of the idea has been assessed. I would have
other comments about the flexibility on API implementations.
I don't think this
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave
differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every time
you use it.
Your accusations are unfair. First of all, your GIMP setup seems
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhere I came across a reference to gimptool-2.0 and it fails even to
--build the std issue plug-ins that are already installed.
The tool is called gimptool-2.0. And no, it can't build the plug-ins
from the source tree
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 13:39 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
As well as I understand, the switch to TinyFu from Script-Fu for 2.4
is quite possible (considering Tiny-Fu is already shipped with GIMP
2.3.x for Windows by default).
It is very unlikely that 2.4 will ship with tiny-fu. The
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 11:15 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
cheekyWe could rename the GIMP to something else like GNU masterstroke
That was probably the most stupid direction that you could have steered
this discussion into. Thanks for ruining an effort to actually discuss a
problem that we
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
advantage of their sysadmin team?), update the DNS records and move on
with our lives with new
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:50 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
I am not sure about does not operate vs. cannot manipulate, but I
agree with the usage of images instead of layers: talking about
images makes it more likely that the user will think about changing
the image mode. In the current
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:27 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
You mentioned last week that you wouldn't be against switching to
Tiny-Fu in 2.4 if the remaining problems (mainly the namespace issues)
could be solved in time. It looks like Kevin had been previously
discouraged from fixing
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:02 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that
can happen when clicking the image to the image window's statusbar,
using the new gimp_statusbar_push_temp() API.
How do we handle the statusbar being invisible?
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 23:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill, to you it *is* a transform tool because you are close to the code
and you know the way is it implemented. To the user it *is not* a
transform tool. It's just a tool off the palette like any other that is
called Move
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 19:37 +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
It seems that more and more applications start to rely more or less
heavily on middle mouse buttons and/or scrollwheels (Gimp and Google
Earth come to mind), which is a bit annoying as my laptop is my main
machine.
GIMP doesn't
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 15:51 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
someone could review the strings that have
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 21:05 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote:
GIMP already supports import of a variety of palette formats. The
code for this is in app/core/gimppalette-import.c. Perhaps you or
someone else would want to try to include your code here?
Okay, I'll take a look at it.
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 21:40 +0200, Peter Karp wrote:
I assume that RGB and CMYK space are the default spaces for new
pictures and that it can be assigend to untagged pictures? For what is
CMYK space used when Gimp does not support CMYK editing of files or
have I overseen that this will
1201 - 1300 of 3017 matches
Mail list logo
