Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:31 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: I'll give it a shot (already have the file open and have started to edit it). Although I should probably ask elsewhere, would I be better to create an external module (.[cho]) with the AI palette import code, or put the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:44 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: One question I did have is that the AI Palette entries are defined with floating point values for RGB, I presume that currently GIMP supports only the usual 24 bit RGB triples (ie, 0-255 per channel)? GIMP uses a structure

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 17:30 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: Using the latest stable (2.2.13) release - is there a release that would be preferential in this situation? In this particular case, it probably doesn't make much of a difference. But it will be easier to incorporate your

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:11 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote: It should go to gimppalette-load.[ch], together with the standard palette loader function. Look at how the gradient loading/saving files are organized, and how gimp_real_initialize() in app/core/gimp.c maps file extensions to data

Re: [Gimp-developer] Adobe Illustrator to GIMP palette converter

2006-09-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 09:18 +1000, Paul L Daniels wrote: I've written a stand-alone converter for Adobe Illustrator palette files (.ai) to GIMP palette files. This was written because I do vinyl cutting/signs and the various makers of the vinyl (Avery etc) produce

Re: [Gimp-developer] easier way to convert image into selection

2006-09-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 08:33 +0930, David Gowers wrote: I tested it for RGB images and it appears to work correctly. Perhaps it just uses the 1st channel (R) though. That's what it does. Perhaps the procedure should warn instead. Sven ___

Re: [Gimp-developer] easier way to convert image into selection

2006-09-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 09:39 +0930, David Gowers wrote: It's much easier to code 'image to selection': c = pdb.gimp_channel_new_from_component(image, GRAY_CHANNEL, 'TEMP IMAGE2SELECTION') This works for grayscale images only. An RGB image doesn't have a grayscale component. For

Re: [Gimp-developer] Lanczos algorithm matrix

2006-09-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 09:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems pretty good on the tests I did although arguably whether it is better or worse than cubic on my data. Different sure. I think best is subjective and depends on the nature of the image. The term Best has already been

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-09-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:31 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: the internationalisation of the Gimp Python bindings and plug-ins is still pending: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287 We have come a good deal further here in the meantime. The framework for internationalisation

Re: [Gimp-developer] Customizing GIMP windows and behavior

2006-09-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 13:54 -0700, William Skaggs wrote: Sorry, I should have been clearer. You can of course have multiple views already, but as far as I know there is no way to make gimp automatically create multiple views when opening an image, that is, using a script or plugin. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] heads up to translators

2006-09-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, on gnome-i18n someone suggested a command to detect the problem that I outlined earlier in this thread. Here's a version that is subtly changed for the GIMP source tree: pcregrep -M -l 'msgid.*\|.*\nmsgstr.*\|' po*/*.po Unfortunately this doesn't work because at least in the main

Re: [Gimp-developer] make healing brush and clone tool use one source and possibly involve shift modifier

2006-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:32 +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Making a conclusion, sometimes it is required to replace the destination color with the source one, not only to flatten or copy the texture of the source. That's why I use the clone tool consequently with the healing

Re: [Gimp-developer] soc-2006-healing-brush branch merged and closed

2006-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Kevin, a while ago I wrote to the list with the following questions and I don't remember to have gotten answers to them. Will you please consider to answer these questions? On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 07:55 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Of course optimizing the Laplacion solver is still desirable

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, the internationalisation of the Gimp Python bindings and plug-ins is still pending: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287 Does this mean that noone is interested in having the existing Python scripts in GIMP 2.4? It should not be difficult to make the plug-ins use the existing

Re: [Gimp-developer] soc-2006-healing-brush branch merged and closed

2006-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:52 -0500, Tim Mooney wrote: My guess is that Kevin isn't listening right now, because of the move and internship he mentioned at the bottom of this email: https://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2006-August/016152.html Sorry, I missed that. Thanks

[Gimp-developer] heads up to translators

2006-09-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, not sure if I can reach a lot of translators here, but the ones who are reading the gnome-i18n list should already be aware of this issue... We have started to use translation contexts in GIMP. Only in a couple of places so far, but we will probably extend this to more strings. The idea of

Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC roundup

2006-09-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 13:51 +0200, David Neary wrote: * Proposal for implementing vector layers in the GIMP Hendrik Boom(Simon Budig) Henrik's vector layer code is now in CVS, and in the 2.3.11 release. There are some other features which are in planning. Correction: the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Perspective clone segfault

2006-09-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 20:01 +1000, Campbell Barton wrote: Hey, is it ok to report bugs her? With Blender3D we sometimes report bugs on the ML if the features are in active development or just added. It is actually too early to report any bugs in the new tool. It has only just been merged

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.3.11 Development Release

2006-09-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 00:33 -0500, Tim Jedlicka wrote: Great job - when you/we release 2.4 I think a lot of people will be impressed with the progress made. The announcement mail contained a link to the bugs on the 2.4 milestone. We will release when this list is empty. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] colormap-remap - colormap-rearrange

2006-09-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 15:46 +0100, Mukund wrote: Sorry about bug #345251; not trying to clutter up bug reports. I have asked for it to be renamed to colormap-rearrange.c from the time the menu item's label was changed to Rearrange Colormap as it's more logical for a person to find it

Re: [Gimp-developer] Perspective clone segfault

2006-09-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 23:52 +1000, Campbell Barton wrote: This happened again with the perspective tool, if it had crashed and closed it would have been ok, but in this case it gave the [segfault error, continue, exit... etc] in the command line prompting me for input, but the input

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.3.11 Development Release

2006-09-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, yesterday, when a short period of time opened where the HEAD branch appeared to be in a somewhat sane state, I rolled up a tarball dubbed gimp-2.3.11.tar.bz2. Right after that had happened, Mitch broke the whole thing again by merging another SoC branch into HEAD ;-) The tarball is up at

Re: [Gimp-developer] healing brush hanging X11

2006-09-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Kevin, On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:15 -0400, Kevin Sookocheff wrote: OK. That seems logical. So during the mouse stroke a region is selected, and after the mouse stroke healing is done on the selected region. Are there any tools in GIMP right now that follow a similar sequence? The

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-09-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 12:22 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: I'm afraid I am not able to post documents in less hidden places than mailing list threads. The point is not where the document is posted. The mailing-list is fine for this, probably even the best place since it should be

Re: [Gimp-developer] healing brush hanging X11

2006-09-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 20:45 -0400, Kevin Sookocheff wrote: A bad point about the current implementation is that it is slow. The Laplacian solver is not optimized. There are also other ways to implement the Laplacian solver that may increase the speed. As far as I know, the Heal tool

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I'm talking about http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 There hasn't been any further progress on this, we are still waiting for a patch that can be applied to CVS. This is really getting urgent now since we want to go into string freeze soon. This thread has pointers to patches

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-08-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, Regarding http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287 some progress has been made in CVS. To avoid i18n problems, the procedure registration in pygimp has been changed (in a hopefully backwards compatible way). It shouldn't be too difficult to add i18n now. But still, there hasn't been

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-08-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 12:34 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: Could you describe what you find missing in the explanation of my workflow on real-world examples that I have already posted? We need a document explaining this which is not hidden in a mailing-list thread. A document that we can

Re: [Gimp-developer] XCF spec

2006-08-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 20:56 +0200, David Neary wrote: Could we get Henning's XCF spec committed to CVS before any of the freezes for 2.4 come into effect, please? It's a vast improvement over the existing version, and has been improved since his first draft to include a detailed

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 13:34 +0200, Roman Joost wrote: Besides the technical problems, I think you should propose a new site layout than just pestering about the current layout. That's of course correct but Shlomi has a point here. The pages that he mentioned look vastly different than the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-08-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:14 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: Your idea of real work is obviously very different from mine. I do lots of real work on indexed images. Perhaps you should write up a summary then that explains your workflow on real world examples. At the moment we are talking

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:09 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Then there is no sense in naming the planet layers anymore. I agree that implementation could be better, though I can even imagine how exactly within current approach). There has never been a good reason to call it layers.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-08-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 18:49 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Henning has already described what he does, and it seems clear to me that alpha-thresholding all paint application would work well for his purposes. I'm sure he'll say if that is not the case. We still need a summary of all this for

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-08-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 02:28 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Ah, the #define SUBSAMPLE 8 line. Changing it to 1 does indeed do what I wanted. Actually, I take that back. Well, of course changing the define is not what you want because then you can't get the old behaviour

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-08-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:01 +0930, David Gowers wrote: Is there some simple way to achieve hard-edged rendering for the Ink tool? Should be a simple change, just turn off supersampling in the ink code. I find the hard edged rendering used in INDEXED mode best for drawing lineart, but

Re: [Gimp-developer] Parasites and Tattoos: some questions

2006-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 15:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, the *-parasite-find PDB functions return a list containing a single list: for example, ((gimp-comment 1 #184372656174656420776974682047494d5000)) There does not appear to be a way to create multiple parasites with

Re: [Gimp-developer] new GIMP releases ahead

2006-08-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 09:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would very much like to see the old wire-frame icon theme available in the next release. I do not find the new theme to be an improvement and should like to have the option of restoring the original. Why don't you

[Gimp-developer] new GIMP releases ahead

2006-08-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, just a quick note to tell everyone that I am planning to do a 2.2.13 as well as a 2.3.11 release soon. If there's something that you think should absolutely go into the next release or if you think that there's something that should block one of these releases, please tell me about it.

Re: [Gimp-developer] GtkGlExt in a GIMP plugin

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 17:01 -0700, Joseth Farley wrote: To summarize my problem, when I link the gtkglext libraries (as retrieved from `pkg-config --libs gtkgkext-1.0`) to my GIMP plugin, it won't even run in GIMP anymore (crashes right away). Have you tried to run your plug-in binary

Re: [Gimp-developer] How to replace the GPtrArray with a type in Delphi?

2006-08-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 23:50 -0700, gmbros wrote: I want to translate the Intelligent Scissors Tool of Gimp to Pascal with Delphi. But I encounterd a lot of questions. Such as what does the GPtrArray mean? How to replace it with a type in Delphi. Dose anyone here know how to translate

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: rectangle select tool specification

2006-08-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 22:29 -0500, Tim Jedlicka wrote: Why make only the handles grabbable? I don't understand the harm in having all edges grabbable. I think the idea is that different actions are assigned to different handles. If you grab a handle in the middle of an edge, you only

Re: [Gimp-developer] on moving toward a 2.4 release

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 09:09 -0700, William Skaggs wrote: In any case, something has to be done to blast us out of the current state of near-paralysis. We are in what? There are several people working hard and they all have the 2.4 release in mind, concentrating on the important things

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plugin Debugging Script

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 11:39 -0400, Brohan wrote: I just made a tiny little shell script that helps me a bit with debugging of plugins, and I'd like to share it. It really is a lifesaver and saves the time spent doing ps -A, and then typing in the process manually in gdb. I hope you know

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I have opened a bug-report for this and I would like to point out that we should not wait too much longer with this. We should give the translators enough time to deal with the new strings. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I have opened a bug report on what I believe to be the remaining issues with gimp-python: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287 Even though I said earlier that's it's perhaps too late for adding i18n support, I feel now that we absolutely need to do this if we want to install any

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Perspective Clone Tool

2006-08-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:37 +0930, David Gowers wrote: * Why is the 'hard edge' toggle (from the clone tool) missing? Usually hard edge is my preference. Do we really need this toggle at all? You should get similar results if you used a hard brush. * Being able to turn off interpolation

[Gimp-developer] OpenUsability Sponsored Student Project: GIMP

2006-08-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, OpenUsability (www.openusability.org) is an initiative that brings Open Source Software development and usability together. We have been working with them in the past and I am happy to be able to announce today that OpenUsability is going to sponsor students projects, somewhat similar to

[Gimp-developer] OpenUsability Sponsored Student Project: GIMP

2006-08-11 Thread Sven Neumann
OpenUsability Sponsored Student Projects OpenUsability (www.openusability.org) is an initiative that brings Open Source Software (OSS) development and usability together. This symbiosis is beneficial for both sides: Developers can make difficult user interface (UI) decisions together with

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp_pixel_rgn_resize help

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 17:02 -0400, Brohan wrote: I'm well aware of gimp_zoom_preview_get_factor(), but there isn't a matching fuction such as gimp_zoom_preview_set_factor(). I have changed the API a little now, introducing a way to get access to the GimpZoomModel that is being used by the

Re: [Gimp-developer] rectangle select tool specification

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 15:50 -0700, William Skaggs wrote: Rectangle Controls: An expander containing a set of spinbuttons and checkboxes used for specifying the shape of the rectangle numerically. There are checkboxes for fixed width, fixed height, and fixed aspect. If any of

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP_DATA_DIR and GIMP_PLUGIN_DIR in m4macros/gimp-2.0.m4

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote: I'm playing around with my plug-in build system at the moment, tidying up the automake/autoconf stuff as I go (and as I learn about autotools - I'm a newbie there). One thing I do is find the Gimp plug-in directory like so:

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] SoC: Healing brush

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:04 -0400, Kevin Sookocheff wrote: Hello everyone, I recently finished an implementation of the healing brush. A patch implementing the brush is given at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109801#c11 but does not contain the icon and cursor that I

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp_pixel_rgn_resize help

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:29 -0400, Brohan wrote: I'm still having the same issue as before with the same error as before. (gimp:26837): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: expected tile ack and received: 5 I've ran gdb and set every possible breakpoint and it always says that the program

Re: [Gimp-developer] rectangle select tool specification

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:15 -0700, William Skaggs wrote: Concerning the aspect ratio, it should be possible to come up with a method that allows easy entry of integer ratios. It isn't clear that we will be able to come up with a menu of standard ratios for 2.4. If we could just use a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re : rectangle select tool specification

2006-08-10 Thread Sven Neumann
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:51 +0200, cedric GEMY wrote: may be i misunderstood your actual specification, but when you define modifiers, i only talk about multiselection modes. What about old options with Ctrl and Shift that does the same as Expand from center and Make Square. In fact it

Re: [Gimp-developer] Please bring back the old rectangle selection...

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:49 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote: First of all the new one doesn't save it's options. That could be remedied but the amount of changes (I'm a C++ developer and really can't get my head around doing the way object orientation is done in the tool, the

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp_pixel_rgn_resize help

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:57 -0400, Brohan wrote: I'm building a plugin to compare two images side-by-side with panning and zooming, and I'm having a bit of an issue with getting the zooming to work. The way I'm doing it is initalizing a pixel region with the width being (width of

Re: [Gimp-developer] On holidays, and summary of GIMP money

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 16:48 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: As I said on IRC last night, in case anyone is wondering, the GIMP currently has roughly $21,000 in the GNOME fund. Wow, I wasn't aware that that much money had piled up. 1. Paying for the GIMP user manual to get into a publishable

Re: [Gimp-developer] Please bring back the old rectangle selection...

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:44 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote: I have no doubts about this but there is a problem discerning these two by just looking at the code if you are not that much into the GTK way of doing objects. There also is little documentation whatsoever on what parameters

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp_pixel_rgn_resize help

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:17 -0400, Brohan wrote: Ah, I expected it to do any scaling. Are there any library functions that do do scaling? I was expecting gimp_pixel_rgn_resize() to do the scaling, as resizing the pixel region might entail scaling. Resizing in GIMP terms usually just means

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp_pixel_rgn_resize help

2006-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 11:36 -0400, Brohan wrote: Ah, its a scaled *up* picture that I need. The problem with GimpZoomPreivew (And I have looked into it), is that there's no way to get the zoom factor to set on another preview. There's gimp_zoom_preview_get_factor() for this purpose. A

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] About dialog shows unstable status

2006-07-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 00:27 +0100, Mukund wrote: #define GIMP_COPYRIGHT \ - _(Copyright © 1995-2006\n \ -Spencer Kimball, Peter Mattis and the GIMP Development Team) + _(Copyright © 1995-2006\n \ +Spencer Kimball, Peter Mattis\n \ +and the GIMP Development Team) Why

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] About dialog shows unstable status

2006-07-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 00:27 +0100, Mukund wrote: With further input from Alan Horkan (idea to add descriptive comment) I think that the description should stay GNU Image Manipulation Program as it is now. The new text is IMO too long and I really like the fact that the current About

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Call for art!

2006-07-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: or, if you are not using gimp money or gimp people, you can take wilber off the logo and just use the word GIMP instead. wilber and gnome don't have anything to do with each other, do they? GIMP and GNOME do have a lot in common. It

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.2.12 Release and GIMP 2.3.10 Development Release

2006-07-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, over the last two days, two new GIMP releases have been uploaded to ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/ GIMP 2.2.12 is a bug-fix release in the stable GIMP 2.2 series. Among other fixes, it removes a possible buffer overrun in the XCF parser. Even though there are currently no known exploits for

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:41 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: Forgot to say this: not only had I complained, but I also offered to fix the issues with the python scripts right away, and you just said it was too late. Me saying that it is late, even too late, doesn't mean that

Re: [Gimp-developer] XCF format specification

2006-07-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 11:47 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: I would like to contribute it as a replacement for xcf.txt, but I would like it to be correct first. While that's an admirable goal, it's already vastly better than what's there already. So I think the sooner we get this into

Re: [Gimp-developer] panning

2006-07-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 11:27 -0700, John Waugh wrote: I got no real response to the below question on gimp-user, so I guess it's time to start editing the source (: I would like to either 1) add a new 'pan' tool, to which I could then assign a key -or- 2) somehow remap the middle

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Compiling problem with Gimp 2.3.9 in FreeBSD 6.1

2006-07-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 10:22 +0300, Haarald Sinihammas wrote: If i get full source from cvs then i have trouble with autogen.sh - okay, lets using aclocal19 and so on. You should use autogen.sh. If you want to specify a particular binary to use instead of aclocal, you can do that by

Re: [Gimp-developer] feature request

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 10:38 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: Why not to bring all the GIMP windows up over all the others windows when I clic on to one of the many GIMP windows? Because it isn't trivial to do that. You can try the transient windows option in the Preferences dialog of a recent

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: SoC mentors students: mid-term evaluations!

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 11:03 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: For mentors, it is not just recommended to be subscribed here, it is a requirement - as in this case, important information about the program is sent to this list, and I have been working on the assumption that all GIMP mentors are

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider. We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those incompatibilities have been sorted

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 01:11 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Now that GIMP handles registration of the same menu item from different plug-ins, I am just waiting for the time a user reports a bug in Whirl and Pinch (for example) and doesn't realize which version they were using (as in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] XCF format specification

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:44 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: Related to this: While researching the format I discovered a buffer overrun somewhere in the XCF parsing code. Is there a recommended way to report security bugs confidentially? (I asked on IRC and was encouraged to just use the

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 21:36 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: It is allright for me if you do not install then- but I had complained. - At least count that. IIRC, there hasn't been a comment in the respective bug report, but I might be wrong. Actually we could think of then

Re: [Gimp-developer] PSD load/save

2006-06-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 14:37 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: Does anyone own a list of supported and not supported by GIMP features of PSD? Googling hasn't helped me much, but at least it gave these two useful sources:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:16 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: Plugins have both a short summary description (blurb) be and a longer more descriptive help. It might be worth making things consistent and doing the same for scripts. As I already explained, we can't easily do that without breaking

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-06-28 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 01:43 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: I e mentioned once or two that when the script-fu and python-fu scripts where brought togetehr to teh same menu space as the C filters there would be confusion about which menu entry is associated with a script in

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages (long)

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 11:49 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: what is the purpose of a toggle that says Background? There is no toggle that says Background in the options of this tool. That's why I will not try to answer the rest of your mail. You would better look at the tool options again and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for your scheduling needs? That would be sufficient but I am afraid that you misunderstood

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 05:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two blurb strings available (one for the status line and one for the plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the one. I had mistakenly

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:17 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Is there a particular need for these blurbs to be short one liners other than making things easier for the translaters? Yes, they need to fit into the statusbar and should follow the same style that plug-ins use for the blurb. One

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:35 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: The file plug-ins could as well use the functions via the PDB then. What's the benefit of linking to them? Cleaner code (core/GUI separation, maintainable by different people), lower overhead (especially when changing many

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:09 +0930, David Gowers wrote: It looks like there is a bug in the SIOX tool/gui that causes it to return to the foreground setting unexpectedly, until the Control key is first pressed, then it works as expected. That's not a bug. You cannot mark background unless

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:08 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: Anyway, my main argument is that it would be more consistent with the other tools: the other selection tools, the transform tools and the zoom tool only consider the state of the modifiers before the first click. Subsequent

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 15:36 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: i really tried to use siox this weekend. it is so confusing, i have no idea what to expect from it or if what happened to me was a bug. the default is foreground extraction. i wanted it to background extract and toggled this tool

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:33 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: Well, let's say that it makes it a bit easier if the code is at least split in separate directories (even if a library is not required for that). As for the lower overhead, it does make a difference if the file plug-ins can link

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In particular, I do not know what marked them for translation means (if this is referring to

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages (long)

2006-06-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:22 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: Here is a proposal for improving the messages that are shown in the status bar. Such messages would be very useful for describing some hidden features of the paint tools (bug #124040) but also for the other tools. Basically, I

[Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened for Script-Fu yet, even though the script procedure blurbs are shown in the status bar as well. Thus,

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

2006-06-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:15 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: Most of the functions listed above are currently implemented in the metadata plug-in and exported in the PDB. So you can find a slightly longer description of these functions by looking in the Procedure Browser and searching for

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

2006-06-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 23:53 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: The file plug-ins would not use these functions via the PDB because they could use the library directly. The file plug-ins could as well use the functions via the PDB then. What's the benefit of linking to them? That covers the

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

2006-06-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 20:19 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: I was thinking that if Jimmac created his new theme independently - something he might have already done - it would remove any need to delay its introduction. The theme could be added now it could be made the default later when it

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

2006-06-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 09:54 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: Will the old icons be offered as a seperate theme set? If someone wants to create such a theme, we might consider to include it. I would suggest however that is it being shipped as a separate package. Perhaps we could have a package

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Cancel function and plugins

2006-06-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote: Sven Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up before it Sven exits. No, SIGKILL can't be caught by a process. The plug-in receives a QUIT message on the wire before it is being killed. Probably not trivial to do the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Cancel function and plugins

2006-06-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:36 +0100, Toby Speight wrote: While we're on this subject - obviously the plug-in process has no chance to clear up if it's killed outright, Well, in theory it could catch the signal and clean up before it exits. so what happens to e.g. undo stack in this case?

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.3.9 Development Release

2006-06-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, this night the GIMP 2.3.9 release appeared on the FTP server: ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.3 Version 2.3.9 is an unstable development snapshot of the GNU Image Manipulation Program. It is however not quite as unstable as one might think, and rumours are that it is one of the last

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.3.9 Development Release

2006-06-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 13:28 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On 6/6/06, Sven Neumann wrote: Over the next weeks, we will try to add the remaining missing features and to iron out all the bugs that are blocking the 2.4 release. Any help with that is very much appreciated

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer

2006-06-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 12:07 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote: The plug-in, I'm writing, creates a number of layers, every layer receives an object, for example a circle (created by ellipse selection, an selection fill), but somewhen, don't know why, the layer contains not only the desired

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer

2006-06-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 11:58 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: For C plug-ins that might be true. However, python plug-ins are not good in dealing directly with pixels - that is, for rendering things. There is no need to access pixels directly. We are not asking the C programmer

<    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   >