Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, GSR - FR wrote: > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:48:23 +0200 > From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: [Gimp-developer] [iso-8859-1] D?j? vu? (Re: Why be c[iso-8859-1] > ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions') > > Hi, > [EM

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déj à vu? (Re : Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [iso-8859-1] D?j[iso-8859-1] ? vu? > (Re[iso-8859-1] : Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions') > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:18:22PM +0100, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Gimp-developer] make a test

te s'il vous plais: http://gimp.org/mail_lists.html "Use the English language" It may not be in the rules but there is a rule on Internet Relay Chat (IRC) and it applies equally well to the mailing lists: Do not ask permission to ask a question, just ask. Sincerely Alan Horkan P.S. I tried

Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

> Hope my suggestions are not too impractical. With interested developers, time and resources they sound possible. Otherwise they are more nice suggestions which might not go anywhere. Sincerely Alan Horkan ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] What is this list?

rephrasing it. You may ask questions but you might not always get answers. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface...

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Roland Wild wrote: > Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 04:00:35 -0400 > From: Roland Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface... > > Carol, > > I can't understand your response. (maybe a little because of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Customzing GIMP

it. What changes do you have in mind? Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Open Clip Art http://OpenClipArt.org Alan's Diary http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Background window [was Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Google SoC]

ses: "Gimp Background window version 2.1, Copyright (C) 2004" As far as I can tell is what is less flatteringly but better know as the GIMP Deweirdifyer since the source archive for it is labelled BackgroundWindow. Is there some techincal reason making it impractical to integrate th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Can we redearch end user needs and come up with a long term developement solution.

ss they really want to. combine that with the option of running windows programs using Wine <http://winehq.com> I'm not sure I agree with your assertion about programs being scarce. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com _

Re: [Gimp-developer] Customzing GIMP

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > On 4/17/06, digi artist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All I really want to do is to hide some menu items (especially when the > > picture has been opened) and rename some items on the 'Filters' menu. > > period. > > I would really appreciate your hel

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

t; - Healing tool: like clone tool with extra steps and special blend > mode. Request for a Healing brush: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109801 > A different thing: > > - Improve the save session support. Currently dock order and other > details are remembered. Re

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:02:47 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC > > Hi, > >

Search of Filters [Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Google SoC]

ed to add a button which would bring up the currently selected filter but I didn't get very far with it, although I do think it should be possible to hack together soemthing. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Open Clip Art http://OpenClipArt.

Re: [Gimp-developer] RFC: three questions for the LXF article

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Michael J. Hammel wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:52:24 -0600 > From: Michael J. Hammel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer Mailing List > Subject: [Gimp-developer] RFC: three questions for the LXF article > > If anyone wants to comment on these, please feel free. >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: [...] > Besides that, certifications are sometimes sought for those without > the abilities or application to stand by themselves, either in their > C.V. or personally. Listing "GIMP" [1] as one of your qualifications on a resume is more l

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:55:39 -0700 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification > > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

On Sun, 14 May 2006, David [utf-8] Gómez wrote: > Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:51:52 +0200 > From: "David [utf-8] Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification > > Hi Alan, > > On Ma

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp connotations ?

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Fennec wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:11:17 -0400 > From: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp connotations ? > > Well... I don't think I've even seen an IBM product with a name as bad > as The GIMP. I think a name change w

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:52:08 +0400 > From: Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New > layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay > > On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > > I th

Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC Q: SDI vs MDI?

On Tue, 23 May 2006, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:51:56 +0200 > From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC Q: SDI vs MDI? > > Michael J. Hammel wrote: > > > Is the SoC page correct where it asks for an "SDI mana

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

On Thu, 25 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > > I di dnot download it, bu I read the agreement for ownlaoding it. One > > keep his soul and his mother in doing so. I mean- there is no nasty > > They announce a lot of miracles for this format, and it would be nice > > to be able to read and writ

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

On Fri, 26 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:52:44 -0400 > From: Nathan Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format > > On 5/26/

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

On Sat, 27 May 2006, Michael Natterer wrote: > Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:51:22 +0200 > From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image forma

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer

On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote: > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 14:29:02 +0200 > From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer > > Sebastian Breuers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The plu

Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:16:26 +0200 > From: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal > > Hi GIMP developers, > I write to pr

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Dalai Felinto wrote: > Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:00:13 -0300 > From: Dalai Felinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new defaul

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:01:00 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review > > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Kevin Cozens wrote: > > That's nice, but the task is to come up with a short string that must > > fit into a single line and is oriented towards the user, not towards a > > script programmer. The string will be visible in the status bar when > > browsing the menus. Something

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:33 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-devel > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fennec wrote: > Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:13:47 -0400 > From: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all fil

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:36:51 -0300 > From: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrot

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:57:49 +0200 > From: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote

Re: [Gimp-developer] fact roundup

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:31:10 -0700 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev > Subject: [Gimp-developer] fact roundup > > GNOME has been very generous with its cvs (now svn i hear) server and > bug

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Even if I didn't completely screw it up, I imagine there will be some > discussion. I have many doubts about my wording myself. Some issues as > I see them: > 2. In a couple of places I employed the term "selection frame" in > order to differentiate

Re: [Gimp-developer] on moving toward a 2.4 release

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >GIMP 2.0 was released on March 23, 2004, and then GIMP 2.2 on >December 19, 2004. This was a 9 month release cycle, which is >quite reasonable. Howver, it has been over a year and a half since >the 2.2 release, and we are still not v

[Gimp-developer] [long] Suggestions + Patch, Redo (please dont flame), Part 1

standing of why so please consider your criticism carefully. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ PS Please leave my address in the CC line, I am subscribed to the list digest and it will take me a while to give carefully considered r

[Gimp-developer] the user installer

roughly 500 kb. The documentation could explain what these files are for those who want to know more. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman

Re: [Gimp-developer] the user installer

on and the biggest bottleneck in many systems is the time it takes the user to respond to unneccessary questions. Perhaps you might have more respect for the opinion of a real hacker like Havoc Pennington, he is on the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you care to ask him. Sincerely Alan Horkan ht

Re: [Gimp-developer] the user installer

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Alan Horkan wrote: > I am all for giving users the information the want to know but when a user > first starts the GIMP I want to give them the infromation the _need_ to > know. That should include enough information to tell people where they > can find out

Re: [Gimp-developer] the user installer

ould be able to go off and worry about getting a suitable patch done (by me or with help or whatever). Sincerely Alan Horkan. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the user installer]

> Go to the menu and toggle "View Menubar". How did you miss this? (Gimp 1.3.4) I had the menubar turned on I expected to still have the menubar in fullscreen mode. - Alan (had to disappear for a few days been busy with other stuff) ___ Gimp-develope

Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the userinstaller]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:18 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the user >

Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the userinstaller]

> This actually could be a serious usablity issue, since a user who has the > menubar on (which a distro might set as default) after going to fullscreen > mode might not be able to figure out how to get the menubar back, or even > how to return to windowed mode. Hit Escape (Esc) should work. Als

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol10, Issue 18]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If we really are in brainstorming mode here, following the suggestions > listed above, how about a format something like the following, which is > essentially just an XML preamble, followed by raw binary data: > The nice thing about this is that it

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol10, Issue 18]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Roger Leigh wrote: > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 22:22:17 +0100 > From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [Re: Gimp-developer Digest, Vol10, Issue 18]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Christopher Curtis wrote: > Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:10:02 -0400 > From: Christopher Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf [Re: Gimp-developer Dige

[Gimp-developer] (LONG) Problems with the GIMP

and better. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] Me too, or should I say me 2.0

the progress, the improvements and changes that have been made to the GIMP since 1.2 a major number change is understandable and reasonable. > > Just thought I should mention that I agree with you on this one, not that > I would appreciate if you could tell the list about your opinio

[Gimp-developer] [FEATURE] Some plug-in settings should be persistent accross sessions

can help recommend how this might be added. I would be inclined to push the feature request to Future. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ Original message included below: [and list digest options finally changed to MIME so i can reply to stuff properly in future] From

Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help

d be fine. > > Ressources: > - This mailinglist (there had been a big discussion here the last few > days), you might want to check the archives the archives are either completely broken or just severely delayed. it is the 26 of July and the archive still d

Re: [Gimp-developer] Startup Notification support...

Identifying the cause of this weakness would help to smooth > the bumps in accepting (very welcome) external contributions. I am optomistic that there will be an increase in outside contributions when 2.0 comes out. (I dont think a CVS account has anything to do with this, there is anonymouse CVS

Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)

wnloads.html, with the missing exports added, so > > building GIMP 1.3.x for Win32 should now be easier. > > Thanks. I've succeeded in building GIMP 1.3 on Win32 using these packages. Any chance of binaries for testing? And what compiler did you use (wondering if I'll be

Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help

ecked them before posting my previous message. I checked them again just now. July is still not listed. The search doesn't seem to work either Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAI

Re: [Gimp-developer] Startup Notification support...

piracy of Adobe Photoshop the bettter :) Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Summary of outstanding 1.3 bugs/featurerequests.

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, David Neary wrote: > I have been pretty brutal in chopping a bunch of enhancement > requests today. What's left in the 1.3 milestone is a few bugs > with patches outstanding and about 20 feature requests, most of > whioch are claimed by someone or have patches outstanding. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Startup Notification support...

ing which is a very conservative > distribution has the packages available that are needed to build > GIMP-1.3. If we decided to change our dependencies to a newer version, > we always checked if this is really necessary. Very glad to hear that you keep to the highest development standa

Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help

On 28 Jul 2003, Daniel Egger wrote: > Date: 28 Jul 2003 18:52:41 +0200 > From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Joao S. O. Bueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help > > Am Mon, 2003-07-28 um 17.47 schrieb Joao S. O. Bueno: >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wrong terminology in color picker tool

or different tasks and that it is worth while to include the various different colour pickers for the various different use cases. (Although it is entirely possible that you are not talking about exactly what I think you are talking about. Tired, need food.) -- Alan Horkan ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

ts enough for now. I'll add the important stuff in here to > bugzilla tomorrow. > PS: I was skeptical at first, but I am happy with a 2.0 designation > for the next release of gimp. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ [1] Snowballs chance in hell I'll

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

t me started on not being able to use Page Up and Page Down to actually scroll Up and Down the page, I would go even more nuts if the scroll wheel didn't allow me to scroll). This functionality was recently added to Dia, you could probably take a look and substantially borrow the same code. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > > This functionality was recently added to Dia, you could probably take a > > look and substantially borrow the same code. > > GIMP zooms on Shift-wheel since some early 1.1 version. damn, another inconsistancy. so how do you scroll sideways (using the

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Phil Harper wrote: > >Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > so how do you scroll sideways (using the wheel)? > > > is this the same keybinding as Photoshop? > > > >Dunno what PS uses but GIMP uses Ctrl. > is

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Phil Harper wrote: > >On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Phil Harper wrote: > > > > > >Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Not officially. In fact there seem to be people actively resisting it who > >insist on being differnt just for the

Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Simon Budig wrote: > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 00:51:13 +0200 > From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes. > > David Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The point, as I see it, is that there's no reason *not

Keys keys keys [Re: [Gimp-developer] A fresh pair of eyes.]

ences Dialog so that users can easily switch between keybinding sets. Now that we can choose to Reset keybindings from the Preferences dialog quietly copying the old menurc should work reasonably well (maybe). Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ PS I should probably start

GimpCon Thanks [Re: [Gimp-developer] Third big serious meeting fromGIMPcon]

ful as a review for those of you who did make it. Hopefully someone will post links to these on the news page, and gnomedesktop.org when the talks are all finished. Sincerely. Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, like in Paint Shop Pro 8

API calls with Window API calls in various places? (This would definately be a post 2.0 feature of course if it was considered a good idea) Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ PS Wish I could make it to GIMP Con but please do keep notes and let us know how it goes. Have

[Gimp-developer] Re: Ideas for Gimp/GEGL file format.

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Øyvind Kolås wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 21:36:05 +0200 > From: "[iso-8859-1] Øyvind Kolås" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Ideas for Gimp/GEGL file format. > > Sven could you forward this to the list, my mailing possiblities from the > c

Re: [Gimp-developer] Portable XCF

nd be reasonably fast which goes against being a web ready portable format (or at least makes it a low priority). At this early stage hopefully no one will get too attached to any particular name and that can be left until later. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, like in Paint ShopPro8

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Phil Harper wrote: > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 14:15:08 + > From: Phil Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, > like in Paint ShopPro 8 > > >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (

Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, like in Paint ShopPro 8

By the relatively simple step of making sure the maximize window decoration is shown we can make this useful feature much more convenient to use and easier to discover for new and old GIMP users. I am using Gimp 1.3.x on RedHat 9 with is Gnome 2, the default Gnome 2 window mangager Metacity, and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Manners.

ost they wont stick around to find out that it was a joke or that no offence was intended. The GIMP is too important to the community for me not to at least try to do something about the problems I see. We are all strangers, despite the level of familiarity email and the internet provides it helps to keep that in mind Sincerely Alan Horkan. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, like in Paint ShopPro 8

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 19:25:54 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, > like in Paint

Re: [Gimp-developer] bugs@gimp.org spam getting a little out of hand

On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:00:55 -0700 > From: Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Gimp-developer] [EMAIL PROTECTED] spam getting a little out of hand > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Has anyone el

Re: [Gimp-developer] Third big serious meeting from GIMPcon

ke some compromises for the greater good (use existing standards wherever possible would clearly be a good star) and hopefully CinePaint will be considered and kept in mind as part of this process. Sincerly Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] fun with Adobe forums

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > So, did you guys know that Disney considered using the GIMP and/or > > Cinepaint, but instead paid some coders to make sure PS runs in > > WINE? > > > > > Yup. When this was on Slashdot I did m

Re: [Gimp-developer] fun with Adobe forums

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > >>>So, did you guys know that Disney considered using the GIMP and/or > >>>Cinepaint, but instead paid some coders to make sure PS runs in > >>>WINE? > >>> > >>> > I am finding out that trying to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp interface streamlining

eat that you took the time to thnk about how to improve the GIMP but keep in mind that you suggested a whole lot of changes that could take a long time to get done iff there is a developer interested in making the changes you suggest. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp interface streamlining

on of 1.3 http://www.zeitgeistmedia.net/gimp/gimpstreamline2.png Sincerely Alan Horkan http://matrix.netsoc.tcd.ie/~horkana/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] "Ken Burns" style animation tool: standalone or plug-in?

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:54:31 + > From: Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Gimp-developer] "Ken Burns" style animation tool: standalone or > plug-in? > I have recently toyed with the thought of writing a too

<    1   2