On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:34:49PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > how did all the hackers work on gimp last week without jade then?
>
> Things change and the switch to gtkdocize was long overdue. I don't
&
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:34:49PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > how did all the hackers work on gimp last week without jade then?
>
> Things change and the switch to gtkdocize was long overdue. I don't
&
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 08:58:22PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > you need jade to hack properly on gimp? sgml. you need sgml to hack
> > on gimp.
> >
> > i am sorry. i dont get it. perhaps if you
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 09:31:06PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> one last try to explain it to you. GIMP doesn't need Jade. It needs
> gtkdoc to build the developer documentation. gtkdoc can work in two
> modes, the old-fashioned way of using it involves processing SGML and
> thus needs jade or,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:02:41AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i think that the mail list is not as fast as the exchange it is
> > managing here.
>
> I think you are reading the mails faster than you ar
i learned how to encode mpg's since the contest. anyone using gap
should note that "Master Encoder" means just that
i finished the movie about the winners and added some additional splash
that got lost in the shuffle.
there are still some missing splash, from the days of mmmaybe.gimp.org;
a
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:20:59PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Nice! My only complaint is that sometimes the displayed text was displayed
> for
> too little time and I did not have enough time to read it.
>
forgive me, i am a rude and literate american.
first a question. i watched a few bus
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:53:01AM -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
>There is now a file called "exif-handling.txt" in devel-docs that
>summarizes my understanding, based on the exif specifications, of
>how an image editor is supposed to handle the exif data in a file.
>Of course we nee
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:00:29AM -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
> Carol wrote:
> > is the "proper EXIF file" requirement that the name ends in .JPG case
> sensitive?
>
> Well, that was my point -- we're certainly not going to pay any
> attention to such an absurd specification.
>
thank you for s
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:27:16PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Before people get high-horsey about this, consider that 90% of digital cameras
> have embedded DOS as their OS, and are thus unable to generate files which are
> not 8.3.
>
what are the 10% of the digital cameras that do not have emb
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:15:06PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 05.01.2005, at 18:27, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> >Before people get high-horsey about this, consider that 90% of digital
> >cameras
> >have embedded DOS as their OS, and are thus unable to generate files
> >which are
> >not 8.3.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:38:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> now that GIMP 2.2 is out and the major problems with the early 2.2.x
> releases seem to have been fleshed out, it would be nice if we could
> put some effort into documenting some of the new stuff that's hidden
> in the 2.2 version.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:38:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> now that GIMP 2.2 is out and the major problems with the early 2.2.x
> releases seem to have been fleshed out, it would be nice if we could
> put some effort into documenting some of the new stuff that's hidden
> in the 2.2 version.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:13:27AM +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I have been working on a new rectangle-select tool to meet some
> >of the deficiencies of the existing one
>
> Thank you!
>
> 1.
> We may have any number of selection tools. If
you know, i was thinking about it
i suggested that you call your version potatoshop. i like potatoes, so
please do not do this.
perhaps "protowshop" is better.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://li
i just grabbed a fresh checkout of gimp and would like to thank everyone
involved with this:
2005-01-20 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* autogen.sh: applied (modified) patch from Raphaël Quinet that
allows to build GIMP from CVS without having gtk-doc
installed.
hi Shlomi,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:27:36PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Stu! (and gimp-developer)
>
> You can find what I have so far (based on 0.6.3) here:
>
> http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/Gimp/gimp-ace/gimp-ace-0.6.5.tar.gz
>
this is one of my favorite plug-in, thank you for th
hello,
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> I am only asking that you show us what problems exactly you have when
> building gtk+, so that we can help you to solve them. Saying that
> there are "a lot of problems" doesn't help at all and is what I would
> consider spre
thanks rock!
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:57:39PM -0500, Nathan Summers wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:53:27 -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i heard earlier this week that gtk+-2.6 is available on debian sid now.
> > none of the sources i checked had it and st
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:12:18PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Mitch, me and probably others already have some changes pending that
> would introduce a dependency on gtk+-2.6. So far we have usually
> waited until a package reaches debian testing before depending on it.
> Since gtk+-2.6 only ju
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:58:27AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:17:43PM -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libgtk2.0-0
> > >
> > i guess that apt is not so well
hi,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:20:22PM +0100, Jordi Cant?n wrote:
>
> Is there a guide to setup a cvs compilation in a local user without
> interfering the global configuration and the other users in the system?
> I am very interested on getting that color management stuff working, but
> I cann
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:32:03PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
>
> Indeed, you call people reporting them as spreading FUD. Way cool. Thanks
> god I am mostly out of here.
>
thanks god you are somewhat back!
there is a lack of accountability lately, that same god knows that i am
the wrong pe
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:18:18PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Pepster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > My plugin have various user selectable configuration settings.
> >
> > Right now, I use ~/.gimp-2.2/gimprc to store the defaults.
> >
> > I am not sure if it is correct to fill up gimprc in th
hello,
lately i am noticing a new thing about gimp behavior.
if i try to "New Layer" a floating layer that has been pasted onto a
mask, gimp refuses with an error message.
for my limited understanding of the reason for floating layers to still
exist, this behavior tells me that the need for them
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:28:38AM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > if i try to "New Layer" a floating layer that has been pasted onto a
> > mask, gimp refuses with an error message.
>
> This is not new behaviour.
>
fairly new. there
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 11:10:55AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > if i try to "New Layer" a floating layer that has been pasted onto a
> > mask, gimp refuses with an error message.
>
> Sure,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:35:42PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
>
> At gimp.org they don't have downloads for 2.2. If you say it works, this
> is good. But why they don't say the same on the web site.
>
perhaps you could paste the url to where the web site suggested that you
download gimp-1.2?
c
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:51:03AM +0200, Jan Olof wrote:
> Hello! I wonder if the macro recorder will be implemented soon in Gimp?
> I guess that it would be good if it generates Scheme script code.
>
> It would be very great if there was possible to use a macro on every
> picture in the GAP ima
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> As many of you know, we have an informal merchandising arrangement with
> Sourcewear.com which has raise a few dollars this year (not much, though).
>
in the spirit of "open" can they make their files available?
do they have the ab
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> As many of you know, we have an informal merchandising arrangement with
> Sourcewear.com which has raise a few dollars this year (not much, though).
>
> I would like to improve on this relationship, and I know that Federico
> at so
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:07:59AM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
>
> Another question would be whether the old Perl scripts (written for 1.x
> versions of Gimp) run on 2.2.
>
no they dont.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:07:59AM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> >
> >>Another question would be whether the old Perl scripts (written for 1.x
> >>versions of Gimp)
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >
> >i suggest getting the cvs source and reading the existing scripts. i
> >was working on minor updating to some of those scripts (which is sad
> >because there are so many who
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Giles wrote:
>
> P.S. "Who the hell is 'Giles?'" I'm lurking with the intention of asking
> for some weird help once I've made sure I'm not going to sound too stupid.
> Suspenseful, isn't it?
>
with me on this list, you will never look too stupid. ask a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:05:30AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto relationship
> with GNOME-flavoured GTK, but is there any GIMP equivalent to
> OpenOffice's KDE integration (http://kde.openoffice.org/)?
>
do you know what "GTK" stands for?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:53:20PM +1000, David Hodson wrote:
> Leon Brooks wrote:
>
> >It also acknowledges The GIMP for inspiration (yay!) and points to this:
> >
> >http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimpbrush.html
>
> Sadly, I've lost the prototype code that I wrote (although it
> sho
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:13:26PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2005 22:25, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:05:30AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> >> This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto
> >> relationship with G
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:25:54PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> Following the Gnome Human Interface Guidelines is something by itself
> which many people consider enough for any application to consider itself a
> Gnome application.
>
in my opinion, this is the best point you have made here.
> S
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:06:55AM +1000, David Hodson wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >>Leon Brooks wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimpbrush.html
>
> >i am curious if this could do the work:
> >
> >ht
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 05:11:08PM +0200, Karine Delvare wrote:
> "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can only speak for myself, of course, but personally, I end up
> > unfolding the directory view perhaps 90-95% of the times I used the
> > dialog. The only time I generall
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:56:07AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 02:04, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 05:11:08PM +0200, Karine Delvare wrote:
> >> "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I can on
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:36:21PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:56:07AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> > On Monday 20 June 2005 02:04, Carol Spears wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 05:11:08PM +0200, Karine Delvare wrote:
> > >> "Alas
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:46:55AM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
>
> Giles wrote:
> > I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one of you.
>
> I wouldn't worry too much about it. Compared to flame-fests of the
> past, this one is pretty much a yawner. At least they're arguin
now that marc and sven have had their fun and we have all been allowed
an example of how the perlized obfiscuates script-foneys with equal yet
different levels of artificial intelligence; are there opinions of ways
to rearrange the Xtns portion of the menu system?
questions i have are these:
w
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:18:25PM -0400, Nathan Summers wrote:
> On 6/21/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > include a menu entry for each of the gimp script powertools:
> > the browsers
> > the consoles
> >
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Nathan Summers writes:
> > On 6/21/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > different levels of artificial intelligence; are there opinions of ways
> > > to rearrange the Xtns portion of
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 04:39:09PM -0700, Michael Soibelman wrote:
> I've been watching the (Gimp)web site for some time. Is there some realistic
> date when we can expect to see the 'Resources' section updated??
>
> It says: " Soon, you will be able to download additional brushes, patterns,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:44:44PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2005 10:11, Carol Spears wrote:
> > watch this page:
> > http://carol.gimp.org/blog.html
>
> > the day you can click from that page through to individual pages for
> > the resource of
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > I've been watching the (Gimp)web site for some time. Is there some
> > realistic date when we can expect to see the 'Resources' section
> > updated??
>
> Since there is absolutely no progress whatsoever with the GIMP
> website,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:31:46AM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 8/16/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been watching the (Gimp)web site for some time. Is
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:31:46AM -0400, michael chang wrote:
> On 8/16/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been watching the (Gimp)web site for some time. Is
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:58:34PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> On as side not, it is strongly recommended to take Carol's rumbling with a
> (huge) grain of salt - she like to overexaggerate and to play with other
> people, although she will disagree on the latter :)
>
sure. don't let me
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
i just cut a lot of work you did off from this reply. thank you for
that :)
>
> The following names I couldn't find in the ChangeLogs, somebody else
> could grep through the mailint list archives. My apologies if I have
> missed som
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
> The following names I couldn't find in the ChangeLogs, somebody else
> could grep through the mailint list archives. My apologies if I have
> missed someone obvious whom I should know by name.
>
> Ian Main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] his i
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Based on ChangeLog* po*/ChangeLog:
>
i wonder how many of the missing people can be found in gtk+/ChangeLog*?
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
h
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:52:17PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Based on ChangeLog* po*/ChangeLog:
>
> Tim Newsome
i just found this name in the grid plugin as Author. also listed (in
the copyright section) are Sven Neumann, Tom Rathborne and TC
what the heck is a TC? does it mean "Technicall
hello,
we were looking at a page about the adobe building in san jose (on the
irc) and thought it would be fun to put together a similar page about
where everyone works on gimp.
photos of yourself at your computer, or of airplanes going over the
place where you work (i might use a photo of a humm
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:07:27PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Thanks a lot for doing this. I am really looking forward to see the
> results and it is such a nice idea to do this for the GIMP anniversairy.
>
> /me goes l
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:02:01PM +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 23:50 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > Carol Spears writes:
> > > even photographs from the way back past would be interesting.
>
the galleries of gimp conventions are really cool.
how a
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:00:58PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
>
> The dates for the next GimpCon are march 17h-18th-19th 2006.
>
> Please have a look at http://wiki.gimp.org/GimpCon and confirm if you
> will come as soon as possible,
>
perhaps Mr. Neary can publish a list of people he will "allow"
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:42:56PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:07:25PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:00:58PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > >
> > > The dates for the next GimpCon are march 17h-18th-19th 2006.
> &g
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 08:31:47PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
>
> Carol wrote:
> >perhaps Mr. Neary can publish a list of people he will "allow" to attend
> >so that those people who are not allowed will not waste their time?
>
> Open to the public means open to the public. I'd love you to come, b
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:29:21PM -0400, Preacher Public wrote:
>
> So, what can I do?
> First of all I'd like to suggest a small website makeover. Gimp is a
> graphic tool and the website sould reflect it by having a bit more visual
> punch to it.
> here's the quick makeover I did - just a sug
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Lance Dockins wrote:
>
> What if someone considering the possibility of contributing to GIMP read
> that post? They probably would think twice at that point for fear of
> being publicly humiliated for asking a question. Don't get me wrong, I
> greatly
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:04:42AM -0500, Lance Dockins wrote:
>
> I should also clarify that I have considered switching to Linux to make
> this easier, but I just don't have the time, money, and hardware to do
> so without destroying the Win32 environment I'm required to use in the
> professi
yeah, i read something that seemed as if it was too expensive to use
free software and a sane build environment. i have been wrong before.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I've noticed that some ScriptFu scripts run just fine under 2.2.x but
> produce error messages under 2.3.5 (CVS)
> Is there a summary of API changes, possibly with hints for upgrading?
>
i don't think that any of the .scm that c
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:50:49PM +1000, David Hodson wrote:
> An idle query:
> Has anyone written a C++ wrapper for the Gimp API?
>
there is a C# plug-in somewhere. that is probably not a wrapper though.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-de
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:50:43PM -0400, Craig M. Houck wrote:
> ./gimp-2.2
>
> ld.so.1: ./gimp-2.2: fatal: relocation error: file ./gimp-2.2: symbol
> gdk_threads_lock: referenced symbol not found
>
just a guess, but do you need to run ldconfig or some equivelent? just
a guess because i really
hello,
there are a few new gimp.org web sites lately. i have been playing with
the software available from planet.org and the results have been almost
instant.
http://paths.gimp.org is a collection of news from the world of free art
software. i have subscribed to any news page i could find from
hello,
currently the plan is to have a splash contest for gimps tenth
anniversary which, as federico and mitch pointed out should be on
November 21 this year
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.development.apps/msg/b5a9a98ef1e9fd4d
i am not certain of the beginning and end date. i am al
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:28:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > there are a few new gimp.org web sites lately. i have been playing with
> > the software available from planet.org and the results have been almost
> > ins
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:33:08PM +, michael chang wrote:
> On 11/4/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > i considered what sort of collections of blogs i would find useful. i
> > also considered what could happen if only a small fraction of the gimp
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:19:26AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Secondly, you forgot my blog:
>
> http://www.shlomifish.org/me/blogs/
>
it was so forgotten by me that i wonder if i even knew of its existence.
your web log has been added to the developers aggregation and also to
the gimp user a
Hi,
we did it. a 10th Anniversary GIMP Splash Contest has officially begun
on the day of the anniversary/birthday.
the first thing to mention that the word Anniversary appears all over
the contest pages and in the GIMP News. the word Birthday is equally
appropriate and should be used if it fits
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:51:48PM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I have a standard (see below) installation of Gimp 2.3.6 (cvs
> 2005/11/28) . It works fine but I cannot access most of the
> 102 Script-Fu procedures installed under
> /usr/local/share/gimp/2.0/scripts except
> color-wb-bala
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:24:30PM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Yes, thanks. So the next questions is about a "high level" changelog.
>
define "high level" and how it is used to describe a changelog?
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-dev
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:39:11PM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 29 Nov, Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:24:30PM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, thanks. So the next questions is about a "high level" changelog.
> >&g
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 08:12:01PM +, Chris Share wrote:
> I forgot to mention I'm working on Windows.
>
i don't think that you get one then.
gimptool only provides the information about where the files are on your
computer. i think (and they reminded me of this on the irc today) that
being
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:05:46AM -0800, sean wrote:
> example images of bug manifestation
could you put these images online? we don't mail images on this list.
thanks,
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
http
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:12:15PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> I was looking at the patterns that come with the GIMP.
>
> They might have been nice for 320x240 web images that everyone edited
> a few years ago.
>
> But in a world of 7 MP cameras, all patterns that come with the
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 09:25:39PM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On 12/28/05, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
>
> > So - developers, what do you think might be the best approach? To
> > update the patterns that come with the program thenselves or make
> > additional collections available
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 06:59:13AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2005 02:25, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > Another solution would be providing a separate package of new
> > high-quality textures.
>
> Are any of these useful, at least as a starting point?
>
> http://www
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:52:18PM -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>
> compiling and installing Gimp:
> http://www.afolkey2.net/gimp/01/gimpCVS-autogensh.txt
> http://www.afolkey2.net/gimp/01/gimpCVS-configure.txt
>
when you build from cvs you use the autogen.sh script and not configure.
autogen c
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:53:27PM -0500, J. David Taylor wrote:
> Enclosed is a script that's been giving me some trouble. It shows up
> in the script-fu console, but not in the menus. It will, though, show
> up if I refresh scripts after I start the gimp. I just don't see why
> it doesn't show on
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:27:04PM +0100, Axel Wernicke wrote:
>
> a week ago I translated a chapter of the GIMP manual that is dealing
> with the GIMP history. Given the fact that this is about ten years of
> open source and contribution involving lots of lots of people I was
> curious if t
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:40:00PM +0530, Hari wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to redirect the STDOUT to a text widget in gtk. Actually I am
> invoking some APIs which spit some messages on console. I want to
> retarget these messages to some text area..
>
> any suggestions?
>
gimp.message()
car
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:21:49AM -0700, Rob Krajcarski wrote:
>
> I'm looking into writing a plugin for The Gimp where I could have strict
> control over the color that would be painted based on the direction of
> the stroke itself. From what I can see of the documentation only filter
> type pl
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:06:52PM -0700, Scott wrote:
>
> IMHO, any app which is asking for a filename as input should give both
> a keyboard-oriented and a mouse-oriented means of providing it. How
> much extra work is that to program? *Especially* when it has already
> been done, and done well,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:
> I met Wolfgang Drotschmann from the LinuxTag e.V. at the Chemnitzer
> LinuxTage last weekend. He kindly asked, if the developers or users of
> the GIMP want to present the project at the upcoming LinuxTag in
> Wiesbaden. The LinuxTag wi
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:13:29AM +0100, Sebastian Laube wrote:
> Am Wed, 8 Mar 2006 01:05:42 -0800
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbelte:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Roman Joost wrote:
> > > I met Wolfgang Drotschmann from the L
hi,
i noticed that debian had a nifty software available today,
fullquottel - Tool for recognizing mails/postings in tofu/top-posting
style
"The program performs several tests to decide whether the mail is a tofu
mail or not. Each test produces a score. The final sum of the individual
test scores
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > any thoughts about using this software to help manage the berkeley
> > gimp mail lists?
>
> We don't need any nazi software that
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Marega Marco wrote:
> First of all I have to tell I'm not a developer, but just I'm helping with
> italian translation of the program.
>
> I read all the messages that created this flame war.
> Through the lines I found a few good ideas that if implemented
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:59:40PM +0100, Alex Fernandez wrote:
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
> > It was countless times announced by developers in this and other
> > mailing lists that they do wish to improve GUI of GIMP, but that they
> > don't want to clone PS. Sven wrote a special posting ab
there are rumors lately that tor will be working on getting the pspi
filter thingies working on linux. when they become available will that
be announced on this list?
i am curious to no end about these; my idea is that even i will be able
to write a pure gimp equivelent of them. they simply have
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:22:19PM +0100, PLinnell wrote:
>
> In defense of the GIMP team, they are (unfairly IMO) criticized by
> those who are not attuned to the actual state of development and
> their stated goals.
>
> Call it support fatigue if you will, but these kinds of issues have
> b
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need something
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:02:51PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >what os will you be using this on?
> >
> >carol
>
> I'm developping it for and under a Debian-testing system (on amd k7),
> and plan to use it possibly also on an Ubuntu Linux.
> I won't need windows support.
>
i asked because i put i
201 - 300 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
