Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Charlie Clark wrote:
Do you know of a Zope Product that already wraps report lab, or do you
recommend just accessing directly with a script?
I can't think of anything that would do this for you: transforming
HTML to PDF doesn't usually work very well. Reportla
Alexander Limi wrote:
This issue goes back to the original discovery that Zope had a bug that
made its Product lookup mechanism
What do you mean by "Product lookup mechanism"?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Miles wrote:
- PAS: looks the most pluggable but doesn't seem to have a MySQL plugin
and is quite complicated at first glance.
- MySQLUserFolder: appears to fit the bill for authentication but no
changes since late 2005.
- ExUserFolder: also looks like it will deal with authentication but
PData is there for a reason, unravelling it into a string is often not
the best thing to do.
That said, I can't see much context here, but just thought I'd mention it..
Chris
Yvo Schubbe wrote:
Log message for revision 72567:
- added Pdata support
Changed:
U CMF/trunk/CMFDefault/formli
Martin Aspeli wrote:
To subscribe only to particular transitions, you would need for each
transition object to provide a specific interface.
Unless you could leverage the same kind of thing that makes named
adapters work...
zope.event?), it registers a general subscriber for IObjectEvent a
Hi All,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
class IWorkflowEvent(IObjectEvent):
"""A workflow related event
"""
wf_name = TextLine(title=u"The name of the workflow this event is
part of")
transition = TextLine(title=u"The name of the transition taking place")
state_before = TextLine(ti
Hi All,
yuppie wrote:
Layers
--
ZCML is set up using test layers. Their setUp() and tearDown() methods
are only run once for all tests in the layer.
Maybe of interest, I've attached the layers file I use when testing Zope
2 apps. It "does the right thing" w.r.t. having a DemoStorage for
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I'd love to nail this one, it gets boring seeing it in a project's
nightly test runs every night...
A bit of grepping might find that one. :)
Cool, lemme know when you're done :-P
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://ww
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
2006-06-09 20:43:01 WARNING ZODB.DB DB.open() has 13 open connections
with a pool_size of 7
Looks like someone somewhere ain't closing their zodb connection in a
test...
ERROR:foo.bar:eek
None
2006-06-09 20:44:24 ERROR foo.bar eek
None
INFO:foo.bar:blah blah
I'd love
Tres Seaver wrote:
Customization is hard: without TTW modules we *can't* do customization
of arbitrary view logic.
What's the blocker on this? Same thing that's blocking TTW schemas?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplisti
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I sent an email about this a couple days ago. Basically, I'm down to
one failing unit test in CMFUid and have discovered that CMFUid is
basically broken in 2.0/trunk. I also sent an email on this issue to
the list, hoping that the developers who wrote CMFUid and lobbied ha
Stuart Bishop wrote:
silence it (and open a bug report at the same time). The noisier test output
is, the more likely you are to miss relevant information.
Totally agreed, I was kinda shocked at how many deprecation errors Zope
2.9 ships with :-(
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zo
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Anyway, a release and the development situation looking similar helps
people actually work on the same codebase and structure, and not having
to learn different ways of doing things as soon as they switch. Forcing
context switches on people isn't a good idea.
Huge +1 fr
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm not sure what Chris meant, but the change to the visual output of
the testrunner when running "with dots" seems gratuitous to me, as well
-- I don't see any benefit to the "indented, narrower" output,
Me neither, for what it's worth.
Ok
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 02:54, Chris Withers wrote:
I particularly hate the fact that no real effort was put into backwards
compatibility, not to mention those silly weird
sort-of-fifty-dots-per-line thing that doesn't actually work.
I think this is not fair. Ji
Jim Fulton wrote:
From the old testrunner, which I miss *a lot*, I could ensure I am
indeed running a specific module by doing...
Yup, this is one of the things I like least from the Zope 3 world.
What happened to proposals and community agreement before inflicting
big changes on other peopl
Zope Debugger is an enhanced version of pdb for use with Zope.
This release fixes compatability issues with Zope 2.9 and Python 2.4.
It can be used simply by inserting the following lines in any python
code you'd like to debug, including Script (Python)'s and FSPythonScripts:
from Products.zdb
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
From the old testrunner, which I miss *a lot*, I could ensure I am
indeed running a specific module by doing...
Yup, this is one of the things I like least from the Zope 3 world. What
happened to proposals and community agreement before inflicting big
changes on other
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Nope, that's not equivalent. I'm not exactly sure what the
requirements are. A getId method, a title attribute and a meta_type
probably. Subclassing from SimpleItem is definitely a good idea.
...appart from the lame-ass "allow by default" security policy it drags
in alon
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in Plone,
though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and manually
constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much prefer to see CMF grow a way to use Z3 content types w
yuppie wrote:
I think we all know this is where we need to be eventually, 2.0 seems
the right time to do that, I'd actually prefer this, even though it'll
delay the 2.0 release...
Might make sense. But I'll not work on this on my own, so unless there
are other volunteers this is not really an
yuppie wrote:
2.) Switch completely to unicode in CMF 2.0:
Sounds like a too big change, don't think we should try that.
I think we all know this is where we need to be eventually, 2.0 seems
the right time to do that, I'd actually prefer this, even though it'll
delay the 2.0 release...
3
Hi Tres,
Tres Seaver wrote:
No, it isn't, at least in Zope. BLATHER is intended to be "summary"
information, useful for developers but not important enough to show by
default. DEBUG is for more detailed information, and TRACE is for
completely overwhelming detail.
Show me the docs in zope a
yuppie wrote:
By 'broken setups' I meant e.g. if you loose some catalog indexes on
export/import because no handler exists for those index classes. This is
a problem you should know about, but maybe you don't care or you fix
that by hand.
Ah, okay, I kinda agree here, and don't feel strongly
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Stupid is in the eye of the beholder. You don't like something that's
useful for others so you want it to die. Congratulations for your
openmindedness. And you apparently can't grasp the idea that there can
be different levels of informativeness.
Are you honestly tell
yuppie wrote:
1.) It would be nice to have a policy for Zope. If the Zope core
officially supports the BLATHER level (not just in the deprecated zLOG
module) I'm fine with using it in GenericSetup as well.
It doesn't, ZODB has a mapping for it but it's a stupid name left over
from before the
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Or even better:
self._logger.info("%r type info imported." % self.context.getId())
Or you could even take advantage of the good work done by the python
logging people ;)
self._logger.info("%r type info imported.",self.context.getId())
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix
Julien Anguenot wrote:
Can you gimme a use case, within a test, where the interface we define
in CPS would not be enough for you ? In our CPSTestCase we set all
subscribers to 'async' and then all works as if no txn subscribers
exists during the tests.
Ah, okay, yes, I guess this is one way to
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Actually for our Trees Tool, there's also a flushEvents() method. It's
trivial to implement.
I had a feeling it might be, cool :-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
__
Julien Anguenot wrote:
If you want a flush, following what I think I understood you mean ;), we
use the transaction.commit() in the tests when needed.
Okay, but then how do you undo the changes made by that commit?
Also, how would you go about overriding this late-indexing behaviour if
you r
Julien Anguenot wrote:
yup you're right. We do define this already. All the subscribers can run
'async' or 'sync' . Check the base interface for those subscribers there :
http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/file/CPSCore/trunk/interfaces.py
http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/file/CPSCore/trunk/BaseManager.
Florent Guillaume wrote:
That's certainly a good hack. There are several ways to do it, either
with a thread-local variable, or in the request, or by walking the
stack's locals to check for a __dont_index__ attribute... You'd have to
bench, but a thread-local variable is probably the fastest. Y
Hi Alec,
Alec Mitchell wrote:
So, Sidnei has been plugging away at the "AT reindexes things an obscene
number of times" issue today, and appears to have fixed many of the AT
triggered indexing redundancies.
Where is this work being done? I'd be very interested to track it...
*) TypesTool.c
Answering my own question and cc'ing Vinay in since I was also talking
to him about this...
Chris Withers wrote:
I'm unit testing something which does some logging. It's supposed to
log, so ideally I'd like to test for that, but I'd also like to not have
the log spew
Alexander Limi wrote:
And that differs from other Plone releases how exactly? ;-)
And what, exactly, have you done to help Plone have less bugs?
*sigh* there's not a lot I can do, the problems with Plone are cultural.
There seems to be a pervasive culture of monkey patching and
bludegeon
yuppie wrote:
Or would be 'GenericSetup.content' enough?
Yes, that looks nicer to me :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
h
yuppie wrote:
Have a look at MailingLogger's SummarisingLogger for ideas. Give it a
go and let me know where the code is if you want me to take a look,
I've got to know and love python's logging module quite well ;-)
I had a quick look at MailingLogger, but it seems to do something
different.
Alec Mitchell wrote:
to start using it immediately or risk strange breakages. Maintaining
product compatibility between versions of CMF/Plone will become nearly
impossible.
I'm sorry, I really couldn't resist this...
And that differs from other Plone releases how exactly? ;-)
Chris
--
Sim
Hi All,
Asking here 'cos I'm sure I saw someone talking about this recently.
I'm unit testing something which does some logging. It's supposed to
log, so ideally I'd like to test for that, but I'd also like to not have
the log spew showing during tests runs, which seems to have started
happen
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
There could be a "multiplexer" that logs to the standard Zope event log
*and* keeps the messages in a memory buffer to be displayed in the
browser. This could be done in a separate class or a logging API could
be added to ISetupContext. Should be easy to do, really.
W
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Could folks having old CMF branches clean them up ?
See http://svn.zope.org/CMF/branches/
This seems to concern: ajung, andrew, chrism, chrisw, gregweb,
jshell, mj, regebro, shane, sidnei, slinkp, tseaver,
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Could folks having old CMF branches clean them up ?
Why, what's the problem with them?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zo
Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 40036:
Avoid using __file__ where possible.
Why? I use this all over the place so need to know why it's bad ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
__
BIll Anderson wrote:
Ok, so it's clearly been quite some time since I've done any CMF stuff.
Obviously these are not part of Metadata OOTB. What would be the
simplest way to add the ability to set/change these? I'd prefer to be
able to have them set during the creation process and must be able t
Floyd May wrote:
I have a set of files - page templates, python scripts, and zsql
methods - that are set up as filesystem objects. I'm having trouble
getting the security set the way I want it to be with the .metadata
files. Here is the content of my .metadata files:
--8<---
yuppie wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Okay, so how would you get the url for an action from inside a skin
script or template?
obj.getActionInfo('object/view')['url'] for type actions or
provider.getActionInfo('user/join')['url'] for other actions.
Now, do these return full urls or just the last segmen
yuppie wrote:
The _aliases attribute is an implementation detail of default FTIs. ATCT
uses CMFDynamicViewFTI which has a different implementation of
queryMethodID.
Ah, but we're using normal AT, not ATCT...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http
Tres Seaver wrote:
ti.queryMethodID('view', object)
Note that this change is an instance of the "object-overrides-type"
pattern, which is what some people want for *other* type-specific
policies, too (e.g., worklflows, allowed metadata, etc.)
Not sure what this means, or whether you're sugg
yuppie wrote:
This is in a completely set up Plone site? Could you please try to debug
those values while we are still in customizePortalTypes?
Okay, in there, it's just the normal Plone types, which we don't use.
And yes, their _aliases dict appears to have 'view' keys which map to
the righ
yuppie wrote:
getActionObject(action_path) is the method you are looking for.
getActionById is defined as public, getActionObject as private, so you
can't use it in any skin scripts or templates :-(
Can't see why you would need that method in the skins.
Okay, so how would you get the u
yuppie wrote:
Once again:
getActionObject(action_path) is the method you are looking for.
Another problem with this:
getActionById is defined as public, getActionObject as private, so you
can't use it in any skin scripts or templates :-(
Suggestions?
I'd be very much up for getting togeth
yuppie wrote:
I wonder why ti.queryMethodID('view') is None. Is that the case for all
your type infos?
Looks like it.
Does ti._aliases exist? If yes, what does it look like?
Yep, often just maps 'edit':'base_edit', and here queryMethodID
(annoying capitalisation!) returns None
Iin a c
yuppie wrote:
Oops! Should have had a better look at the Plone code. I thought you
need the object.
Now in plone, they do:
view=typeInfo.getActionById('view')
typeObj._setPropValue('immediate_view',view)
The best I've managed to come up with to replace that is:
from Products.CMFCore.utils
yuppie wrote:
listActionInfos() returns a tuple of ActionInfo objects, getActionInfo()
the first ActionInfo that passes the checks. Note that ActionInfo is a
dict, not the persistent Action object you need.
Ah, okay, dunno how I ended up on that trail...
'action paths' are the unique identifi
Tim Peters wrote:
Note: sometimes _internals_ use deprecated gimmicks in order to
support deprecated gimmicks too, and then stacklevel=3 is too small.
It's happened so rarely in ZODB that I haven't tried to "do something"
about that yet.
Interestingly, I've found that even this is sometimes
Hi Yuppie!
yuppie wrote:
getActionInfo()[\'url\']
...will net you a TypeError explaining that getActionInfo takes a
argument that isn't supplied. Looking at the docs, an action_chain,
but I have no idea what one of them is...
'action_chain' is a sequence of 'action paths'.
Does supplying
Hi All,
I'm trying to get Plone 2.1 to SFTU a bit more by shushing its
deprecation warnings...
Getting there but stumped as to what to do with their call to
getActionById in CMFPlone/Portal.py...
They use it to turn for example 'view' into 'base_view', but no
non-deprecated way to do this
Tres Seaver wrote:
Note that I have just figured out that we can make DeprecationWarnings
more useful by passing the 'stacklevel' argument to 'warnings.warn';
passing a value of 2 for that argument causes the warning to be reported
against the *caller* of the code issuing the warning, which makes
yuppie wrote:
def __call__(self):
if self.isTuesday():
return ZopeTwoPageTemplateFile('tuesday.pt').__of__(self)()
return self.index()
Surely the following is going to be better?
tuesday_pt = ZopeTwoPageTemplateFile('tuesday.pt')
def __call__(self):
robert rottermann wrote:
do you have SpeedPack installed?
You could always remove that garbage ;-)
Frostbite is likely going to be a bigger win, and better written too...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_
Deb Lewis wrote:
Configuration: Zope 2.7.7, CMF 1.4.8; also GRUF (GroupUserFolder) 3.3
Why are you using such old and crufty software?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zo
This release adds support for both Zope 2.7 and Zope 2.8.
Zope Debugger is an enhanced version of pdb for use with Zope.
It can be used simply by inserting the following lines in any python
code you'd like to debug, including Script (Python)'s and FSPythonScripts:
from Products.zdb import set_t
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
CMF seems to create expression contexts in two places off the top of
my head: In 'CMFCore/Expression.py' and
'CMFCore/CachingPolicyManager.py'. None of those define 'here' or
'context' but instead just 'object'.
I believe one of those two now has context defined in svn HE
OK, so I misunderstood the actual problem Paul was reporting...
Can someone explain it for a stupid person like me? ;-)
Chris
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
Oh, setupCMFSite is sufficiently clever, it's the CMF tests that aren't
;-)
Stefan
On 5. Okt 2005, at 10:45, Chris Withers wrote
Paul Winkler wrote:
Aha! I just confirmed that it works as you say in zopectl debug.
(You do have to first make sure that the portal has a REQUEST attribute.)
Yeah, I believe the canonical way is:
from Testing.makerequest import makerequest
portal = makerequest(self.portal)
portal.changeSkin(
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
I see two options:
a) Use a different portal name
portal_name = 'mysite'
CMFTestCase.setupCMFSite(portal_name)
Can setupCMFSite not do something more clever if it finds the object
already there?
b) Use getPortal() to create a new portal per test
def get
Zope Debugger is an enhanced version of pdb for use with Zope.
It can be used simply by inserting the following lines in any python
code you'd like to debug, including Script (Python)'s and FSPythonScripts:
from Products.zdb import set_trace
set_trace()
It requires no changes to Zope, CMF or
Hi Tres, (and cmf people),
I got zdb working on the plane back from the Plone conference by
monkeypatching PythonScript._exec to fill pdb's linecache.
However, I do the change in what gets stored in code.co_filename by
monkeypatching PythonScript._compile.
I just got bitten by this with a n
Tres Seaver wrote:
Note that the goal with unit tests is to use the *smallest possible
fixture*; using PortalTestCase when you could equally well use
RequestTest reduces the usefulness of the test:
- it runs slower (the "nibbled to death by ducks" effect, particularly
when re-running the
Julien Anguenot wrote:
The refactoring was obsious and harmless right ? Just removing hardcoded
references to portal_catalog and portal_workflow within the internals
of CMFCatalogAware.
Well, that's not refactoring is it? You've added new functionality with
the intent of allowing a new featur
Laurence,
Could you stick this in the collector so it doesn't get forgotten please?
cheers,
Chris
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Laurence Rowe wrote at 2005-8-22 17:04 +0100:
...
I often define several skins, and after a while they get a little
complicated (I'm using Plone ;-) So in order to make my
Tres Seaver wrote:
Not sure if you've written this, but a general FSXMLTemplate (not
just XSL) would be nice for the rendering of xml Page Templates. In
particular the problem I've wrangled with is inserting dynamically
the
Where that really needs to be:
Yup, we've all been there befor
Christian Heimes wrote:
PS: Login on zope.org is borked. I had to login several times plus a
hard reload of the site in order to log in.
That's 'cos someone left a really crappy old version of Plone on there.
Care to fix? ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulti
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Since you ask so explicitly ;-)
I agree with Florent: Your site's _USERES_ should never get
an error thrown at.
Even if they're potentially destroying their own data as a result?!
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.s
Tres Seaver wrote:
Exactly. The point is that the "adverse effect" *already happened*, in
some prior request, probably due to one of Chris' beloved hasattrs ;).
The current request should *not* be prevented from continuing.
Why not?
Chris, take this as a fiat: this one will *never* turn int
Dieter Maurer wrote:
You asked for this a long time ago and I responded (a long time ago!):
You turn the warning (all of them, if you like) into exceptions
and you get a nice traceback.
You find details in the description of the Python (command) options
or the module "warnings".
OK.
yuppie wrote:
Can you please tell us *why* you hate it? warnings.warn is used in many
places, so if there is a good reason not to use it other code should be
changed as well.
Well, personally, I find it opaque and useless, why isn't it just a log
call?
My personal hate of it comes from seei
Dinh Trung Viet wrote:
It seems that Portal Image cannot display the image when it was set as
default page i.e. id = index_html. Anyone has the same problem before?
I'm using Plone 2.0.5.
Go ask on the plone list then ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consu
Hi Florent,
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I deliberately didn't use a LOG call, because this line will get
executed for every request if there is an old directory view present,
and it'll fill your logs pretty quickly, which is not acceptable.
Well, what's acceptable or not is a matter of opinion ;-
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Yes, logging should be there. I'll add a LOG at level WARNING somewhere,
I'm not sure where (after all it's unrestrictedTraverse that does the
catching).
When something in the catalog tells you, there were an object
and the object is not locatable, then this is an ERROR
an
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
in trying to make it run. The only holdout I know, Plone, has always
been slow to recommend/ship new versions of underlying software.
Amusing given the rediculously incompatible third point releases that
the plone and collective people manage to come out with ;-)
Chris
cla wrote:
I want to add a condition in some portal_tab
that alows to show this or not,depending on
the user name that is logged.
that's faily evil. Why not bsaed on user permissions in context?
sounds like it belongs in an action's goard or something.
Urg, too long since I looked at these to
Florent Guillaume wrote:
+warn('DirectoryView %s refers to a non-existing path %s'
+ % (self.id, dirpath), UserWarning)
Urg. I hate the warn module, anyone object if I change that to a normal
logging call?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management
Well, the source code is it.
You don't need to worry about any of these though, if you just want to
change and add some fields..
cheers,
Chris
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
Chris Withers a écrit :
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
I search information about CMFCore class DirectoryRegistry. What is
it ? How u
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Please read and understand the code more carefully.
There is no expected error. reindexObjectSecurity (which I introduced
more than 2 years ago because CMF was buggy without it) needs access to
all subobjects to reindex them. To do that it has to:
1. use an unrestricted se
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I am proposing to add a simple alias from "here" to "object" in the
DCWorkflow expression context. Unlike the rest of CMF I don't want to
call "here" deprecated, but at least introduce more consistency.
Sort of semi-seriously, why isn't "context" used everywhere?
cheers,
Chr
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I can't say I care about it, sorry :) MemberDataTool is dead to me, only
bits of the API remain :)
I agree. It should probaly go away completely.
I never understood the userfolder/membershiptool/memberdata tools
trichotomy from day 1 of CMF...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix
Eugenio Grytsenko wrote:
executed by default. I tried to overwrite this method by creating the
"External Method" in the Plone site:
That won't work since, as the error message tells you, there's already a
PUT_factory there...
I need to use a PUT_factory different from which CMFCore uses,
becau
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
I search information about CMFCore class DirectoryRegistry. What is it ?
How use it ? ... Where can I found information about it ?
Here's a better question:
Why do you want to know how to use it?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Florent Guillaume wrote:
It could raise Unauthorized because the current user is not allowed to
access the returned object, which is the case if there are security
restrictions lower in the object tree. Which is something you don't seem
to grok.
So why not just catch Unauthorized rather than maskin
Tres Seaver wrote:
Chris, you need to get off this hobby horse. Florent's fix was correct
for the *new* model which has 'getObject' raising (a model you profess
to *like*).
Why not by catching the expected errors? Do you like bare try:
except:'s? (since that's effectively what this is!)
Bugs in
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Specifically, in CMFCatalogAware.reindexObjectSecurity (recently
introduced by Florent Guillaume if I recall), it assumes getObject()
will return None in a failure.
reindexObjectSecurity is as old as the hills to the best of my
knowledge, what was it Florent introduced?
M
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Specifically, in CMFCatalogAware.reindexObjectSecurity (recently
introduced by Florent Guillaume if I recall), it assumes getObject()
will return None in a failure.
Yes, see http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/337 which I'm about to fix.
This is a bad fix IMNSHO :-(
Why was
Julien Anguenot wrote:
Any idea about this ?
CMF-1.5 HEAD / Zope-2.7.5
2005-04-14T16:44:03 INFO(0) ZODB conflict error at
/VirtualHostBase/http/tana.dev:80/tana/VirtualHostRoot/portal_themes/tanaskins/backgrounds/LightGrayStripes2.gif
(1 conflicts since startup at 2005-04-14T16:41:33)
It reminds me
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> Look for CMFSetupExtensions on the collective.
Why am I not suprised...
Why couldn't this just have been fed into the real CMFSetup?!
Actually this code is quite specialized (to Archetypes and other stuff),
it does
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Look for CMFSetupExtensions on the collective.
Why am I not suprised...
Why couldn't this just have been fed into the real CMFSetup?!
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
__
Andrew Veitch wrote:
What's a connection hook when it's at home?
I've got many MailManager instances that I want to connect to different
databases. Normally you have to specify the database connection id in
the zsql method, but the connection hook lets you define a method which
returns a connect
97 matches
Mail list logo
