Can someone provide an example of passing parameters using DTML?
I'm sure this must be doable, but don't see an example in the Zope Book.
I assume it would go something like
dtml-var var1 parm1 parm2
but how would var1 pick up parm1 parm2?
--
John
Am Freitag, den 17.06.2005, 09:44 +0100 schrieb John Poltorak:
Can someone provide an example of passing parameters using DTML?
I'm sure this must be doable, but don't see an example in the Zope Book.
I assume it would go something like
dtml-var var1 parm1 parm2
but how would var1
hi all!
i make heavy use of indexes in my extension classes. these all inherit
from catalogpathaware, so i have to call object.reindex_object() on
each changed instance. calling it from attribute getters/setters f.ex.
is not a good idea, because changing 3 attributes will reindex the object
3
[ Jonathan wrote:]
- Original Message -
From: Jrgen Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i make heavy use of indexes in my extension classes. these all inherit
from catalogpathaware, so i have to call object.reindex_object() on
each changed instance. calling it from attribute getters/setters
Hi!
I am new to this list and rather new to Zope, so maybe this is a
stupid question; unfortunately I haven't been able to find an answer
to it anywhere:
is there a generic way to find out from Python code which method has
been called (in other words: find out where the current method is
located
Personally I think one should stay the hell away from transactions.
They're not for you to fiddle with.
I understand your question and even though I think it's a bit crazy I
can see a benefit (simplicity for the programmer).
How about a trickery solution like this:
class CatalogPathAware:
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am new to this list and rather new to Zope, so maybe this is a
stupid question; unfortunately I haven't been able to find an answer
to it anywhere:
is there a generic way to find out from Python code which method has
been called
I want to know the name (and path) of the _External Method_ from
inside it. What I _can_ get is the name of the DTML method.
I want to build generic scaffolding code for functions that
conditionally redispatch as asynchronous calls (via ZASync); that
part, however, isn't a problem at all -
[ Peter Bengtsson wrote:]
Personally I think one should stay the hell away from transactions.
They're not for you to fiddle with.
I understand your question and even though I think it's a bit crazy I
can see a benefit (simplicity for the programmer).
How about a trickery solution like this:
Hello
Someone could tell me where I could find in Zope the
following call:
from TALInterpreter import TALInterpreter
thanks
a lot
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or
--On 17. Juni 2005 17:12:19 +0200 Simon ALEXANDRE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Someone could tell me where I could find in Zope the following call :
from TALInterpreter import TALInterpreter
grep -r from TALInterpreter import TALInterpreter *
is your friend.
-aj
I'm trying to work out how to pass parameters between various modules
running under Zope and have got stuck.
In the line below, I need to replace the word 'links' with a variable
passed by the calling program
python:here.parse_file(file=context.links,sepr=',',clone=1)
I know I can pass the
Then, in your External method, try::
import inspect
print inspect.stack()[1]
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know the name (and path) of the _External Method_ from
inside it. What I _can_ get is the name of the DTML method.
I want to build generic
On 6/17/05, Jrgen Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ Peter Bengtsson wrote:]
Personally I think one should stay the hell away from transactions.
They're not for you to fiddle with.
I understand your question and even though I think it's a bit crazy I
can see a benefit (simplicity for
Try
python:here.parse_file(file=options['parm'],sepr=',',clone=1)
On 6/17/05, John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to work out how to pass parameters between various modules
running under Zope and have got stuck.
In the line below, I need to replace the word 'links' with a
--On 17. Juni 2005 16:19:46 +0100 John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to work out how to pass parameters between various modules
running under Zope and have got stuck.
In the line below, I need to replace the word 'links' with a variable
passed by the calling program
Unforunately, this just gives me the pythonic path to the method; what
I need for a TALES expression is the ZOPE path - i.e. what I get from
the stack frame is
... E:\zope\Extensions\req.py ...
but what I need is
... http://localhost:8080/ReqTest ...
Ole
2005/6/17, Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL
Hello,
I intend to write a free (GPL) application for browsing and searching
a large collection of classic Hebrew texts, such as the bible. I want
to write it in Python, which is a language that I like very much. It
is supposed to be a stand-alone application, which could be
distributed on a CD.
No, I'm sorry; I only get system paths.
Ole
2005/6/17, Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unforunately, this just gives me the pythonic path to the method; what
I need for a TALES expression is the ZOPE path - i.e. what I get from
the
- Original Message -
From: Noam Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I intend to write a free (GPL) application for browsing and searching
a large collection of classic Hebrew texts, such as the bible. I want
to write it in Python, which is a language that I like very much. It
is supposed to be a
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sorry; I only get system paths.
And what about REQUEST.PARENTS? (or is that just the http request)
Ole
2005/6/17, Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unforunately, this
It's an application instance wrapped in a list; it seems to be
identical to self, actually - self.REQUEST['URL'] and
self.REQUEST.PARENTS[0].REQUEST['URL'] are the same. However, the two
REQUESTs are not the identical object (== returns False).
Ole
2005/6/17, Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an application instance wrapped in a list; it seems to be
identical to self, actually - self.REQUEST['URL'] and
self.REQUEST.PARENTS[0].REQUEST['URL'] are the same. However, the two
REQUESTs are not the identical object (== returns
Dennis Allison wrote at 2005-6-16 09:06 -0700:
We have been seeing a number of instances where python scripts fail due to
an apparent syntax error but the syntax is correct and simply storing
the method restores it to functionality. Anyone else seeing this?
I saw this today.
I expect DOS
John Poltorak wrote at 2005-6-16 22:33 +0100:
...
I was advised to change
base href=/ /
to
base href=http://www.mysite.org/; /
and that seemed to sort out most of the problems.
You should not fiddle with the base tag (unless you precisely (!)
know what you are doing). Zope sets it
Jrgen Herrmann wrote at 2005-6-17 14:19 +0200:
i make heavy use of indexes in my extension classes. these all inherit
from catalogpathaware, so i have to call object.reindex_object() on
each changed instance. calling it from attribute getters/setters f.ex.
is not a good idea, because changing 3
Tino Wildenhain wrote at 2005-6-17 10:57 +0200:
...
Not at all. You could either have tried
it out ;) Or looked at the DTML documentation
in the Zope book *wink* ;)
dtml-var expr=somemethod(parm1=value1,parm2=value2)
Be warned: this is likely to cause loss of the namespace.
Do not forget to
Am Freitag, den 17.06.2005, 19:09 +0200 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Tino Wildenhain wrote at 2005-6-17 10:57 +0200:
...
Not at all. You could either have tried
it out ;) Or looked at the DTML documentation
in the Zope book *wink* ;)
dtml-var expr=somemethod(parm1=value1,parm2=value2)
Be
Hello All,
I'm currently running an intranet site using Zope and Plone and our users
have been experiencing a very large number of blank pages (view source
shows the html, head, and body tag, but that's it) on our site. From what
I can tell, nothing relevent is appearing in the logs and
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Tino Wildenhain wrote at 2005-6-17 10:57 +0200:
...
Not at all. You could either have tried
it out ;) Or looked at the DTML documentation
in the Zope book *wink* ;)
dtml-var expr=somemethod(parm1=value1,parm2=value2)
Be
--On 17. Juni 2005 20:24:23 +0100 John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there also something which explains how to call ZPTs from a DTML
object?
Do you have a good reason for mixing ZPT and DTML?
-aj
pgphTjDYprDSb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 20:24:23 +0100 John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there also something which explains how to call ZPTs from a DTML
object?
Do you have a good reason for mixing ZPT and DTML?
Yes.
I have a
--On 17. Juni 2005 20:40:14 +0100 John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spending a few months learning something
entirely different which only gurus can handle.
This refers to what?
-aj
pgpRdMhEJ5aC2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope
John Poltorak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Tino Wildenhain wrote at 2005-6-17 10:57 +0200:
...
Not at all. You could either have tried
it out ;) Or looked at the DTML documentation
in the Zope book *wink* ;)
dtml-var
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:24:23PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
Is there also something which explains how to call ZPTs from a DTML
object?
I'm unable to pick up a passed parameter.
This is what I've conjured up:-
python:here.lib.parse_file(file=context.options['parm'],sepr=',',clone=1)
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:07:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:24:23PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
Is there also something which explains how to call ZPTs from a DTML
object?
I'm unable to pick up a passed parameter.
This is what I've conjured up:-
John Poltorak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:07:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:24:23PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
Is there also something which explains how to call ZPTs from a DTML
object?
I'm unable to pick up a passed parameter.
This is what I've
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:25:30PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
This is what I have:-
dtml-var expr=testlist(parm='myobjectname')
I wish to get 'myobjectname' into this line in 'testlist' which is marked
with *
python:here.parse_file(file=context.**,sepr=',',clone=1)
Hi there,
Since Zope 2.8 has now been released, we can start talking about what
would be in Zope 2.9. I have some ideas:
* newer version of Five included (whatever version is current then)
* Zope 3.1 included
* Python 2.4 support
I think these could all be accomplished without getting too
Am 17.06.2005 um 11:45 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hi there,
Since Zope 2.8 has now been released, we can start talking about
what would be in Zope 2.9. I have some ideas:
* newer version of Five included (whatever version is current then)
* Zope 3.1 included
* Python 2.4 support
+1
--On 17. Juni 2005 11:45:49 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Since Zope 2.8 has now been released, we can start talking about what
would be in Zope 2.9. I have some ideas:
* newer version of Five included (whatever version is current then)
* Zope 3.1 included
*
I'd be happy if this was *all* that changed in Zope 2.9. This way
we can release Zope 2.9 in the forseeable future, like, late this
year. If Zope 3 is on track there will already be a Zope 3.2
release imminent by then, but I'm okay with Zope 2.x running a
version behind in the name of
On 6/17/05, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think?
Just an idea:
One thing that would be interesting and increase the Z3 compatibility
is to use traversing adapters, and then, of course, make a default
adapter that implements Zope2 traversing for objects that does not
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go through.
This almost sounds as if the Foundation
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go through.
This
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even
Andreas Jung wrote:
[snip]
Depending on how Zope 3.2 will be released it would be cool to have
2.9 shipped with Zope 3.2. I don#t know about the 3.2 release
schedule. Possibly we could focus on a 2.9 release in fall
(October)...
I don't expect Zope 3.2 will be released by october. Jim is
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:29:33 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:04:17 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 6/17/05, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think?
Just an idea:
One thing that would be interesting and increase the Z3 compatibility
is to use traversing adapters, and then, of course, make a default
adapter that implements Zope2 traversing
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:34:34 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
[snip]
Depending on how Zope 3.2 will be released it would be cool to have
2.9 shipped with Zope 3.2. I don#t know about the 3.2 release
schedule. Possibly we could focus on a 2.9 release in
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:16, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Then when I look at the members of the Plone foundation (
http://plone.org/foundation/about/board/list ) I only see companies,
except that ZC is not represented. So even if every member gets a vote,
how much does that vote count in the
On Jun 17, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
However, most members do not write code during their free time, do
they?
What happens when the members write code under working hours, their
respective employers must well have something to say about it?
The PF actually did research
On Jun 17, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 07:16, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Then when I look at the members of the Plone foundation (
http://plone.org/foundation/about/board/list ) I only see companies,
except that ZC is not represented. So even if every
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Since Zope 2.8 has now been released, we can start talking about what
would be in Zope 2.9.
Yup.
I'll just remind everybody that, starting with Zope 2.9 and Zope 3.2,
we are switching to time based, rather than feature-based releases.
We will make feature
On Jun 17, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Paul Everitt wrote:
Other foundations approach things a bit differently. (I did quite
a bit of research on this for the Plone Foundation.)
Eric has done some research recently on the different successful
Open Source / Free
Max M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Further, we will coordinate the releases. Essentially, *Zope*
is switching to a new release schedule. Zope will be released every 6
months
and the releases will be in two parts, a Zope 2 part that includes the
current
Zope 3 and a Zope 3 part.
Will they
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:34:34 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
[snip]
Depending on how Zope 3.2 will be released it would be cool to have
2.9 shipped with Zope 3.2. I don#t know about the 3.2 release
schedule. Possibly we could focus on
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
I'll just remind everybody that, starting with Zope 2.9 and Zope 3.2,
we are switching to time based, rather than feature-based releases.
We will make feature releases of Zope 2 and Zope 3 every 6 months,
starting this December. I suggest a
Jim Fulton wrote:
Max M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Further, we will coordinate the releases. Essentially, *Zope*
is switching to a new release schedule. Zope will be released every 6
months
and the releases will be in two parts, a Zope 2 part that includes
the current
Zope 3 and a Zope 3
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Then there's something I know little about, but is also believed planned
for Zope 2.9:
* blob storage, file iterators
Thanks for mentioning this. I'd like to see blob storage get in before
2.9. I think it'd be a good candidate for
Has my message been rejected (from zope-dev) or not ?
I'm confused.
S.
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Paul Everitt wrote:
Other foundations approach things a bit differently. (I did quite a
bit of research on this for the Plone Foundation.)
Eric has done some research recently on the
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can have several
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
I'll just remind everybody that, starting with Zope 2.9 and Zope 3.2,
we are switching to time based, rather than feature-based releases.
We will make feature releases of Zope 2 and Zope 3 every 6 months,
starting this
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
I hope we will be able to discuss this further next week, but also that
these discussions will be able to procede with the technical side of
things during the sprint next week.
s/with/alongside/
Sorry for my poor english.
Remember that some of us are not native
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 15:54 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
- the trunk is no longer a development area. Developments must happen on
branches and will be merged into the trunk as soon as the stuff is stable.
I won't be acceptable to have half-baked stuff in the trunk. This will hold
up the
I rewrote ZRS's Windows service code to use the new named events set
by current versions of Zope's nt_svcutils/service.py. Overall, this
works really slick, but with a glitch: the ZRS log files suggest that
the signal events never get set when Windows is shutting down, they
only fire when the
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 15:54 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
- the trunk is no longer a development area. Developments must happen on
branches and will be merged into the trunk as soon as the stuff is stable.
I won't be acceptable to have half-baked stuff in the trunk. This
Just an idea:
One thing that would be interesting and increase the Z3 compatibility
is to use traversing adapters, and then, of course, make a default
adapter that implements Zope2 traversing for objects that does not
have a traversing adapter.
Stupid or brilliant? :)
I know
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Then there's something I know little about, but is also believed planned
for Zope 2.9:
* blob storage, file iterators
Thanks for mentioning this. I'd like to see blob storage get in before
2.9. I think it'd
--On 17. Juni 2005 10:04:41 -0400 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 15:54 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
- the trunk is no longer a development area. Developments must happen
on branches and will be merged into the trunk as soon as the stuff is
stable. I won't be
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Just an idea:
One thing that would be interesting and increase the Z3 compatibility
is to use traversing adapters, and then, of course, make a default
adapter that implements Zope2 traversing for objects that does not
have a traversing adapter.
Stupid or brilliant? :)
On 6/17/05, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rule for Zope 3 has been that the trunk needs to be stable,
but that isn't enough. I think the rule should be that
the trunk should be ready to make a beta release at any time.
+1e79
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Thanks for mentioning this. I'd like to see blob storage get in before
2.9. I think it'd be a good candidate for a 2.8-dot release because
it's backwards compatible and optional. It ahould be done (needs a
bit more testing and some
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
This has worked pretty well for the last few years.
I wasn't aware of
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:04 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
This has
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Max M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Further, we will coordinate the releases. Essentially, *Zope*
is switching to a new release schedule. Zope will be released every
6 months
and the releases will be in two parts, a Zope 2 part that includes
the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:28:11AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
This has worked pretty well for the last few years.
Strongly agree. By my count there
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:00 -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:28:11AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
This has worked pretty well for
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:28:11AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
This has worked pretty well for the last few years.
Strongly
My first attempt to post to this list bounced, because I'm not a
subscriber. Jim enabled me to post, so I'm resending, without
cc'ing the z3lab list again. If you hit reply-all, please add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the cc list (if you're allowed to post
there as well :-)
Hi all. Whew, lots of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators) in point releases.
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always had the opportunity to introduce features
that preserve 100% b/c (like filestream iterators)
Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
...
I can't think of any open source foundation that has
company voting in the governance. There is a role for
companies, as sponsors. But, not in the governance.
Stefane pointed out the Eclipse Foundation already, so it's
a little surprising that you are still looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always had the opportunity to
[Tres Seaver]
Agreed, in theory. In practice, the usual handwave has been to construe
the absence of the feature as a bug (with greater or lesser justification).
Like that's going to change wink.
Perhaps we can be more hard-nosed about a no new features in third-dot
releases policy *after*
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:12 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
...
We have historically always
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:00 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
[Tres Seaver]
Agreed, in theory. In practice, the usual handwave has been to construe
the absence of the feature as a bug (with greater or lesser justification).
Like that's going to change wink.
Over the last year Tres, Andreas, Tim,
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can
--On 17. Juni 2005 13:17:13 -0400 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Policy aside, I trust all of these people implicitly to do the right
thing with judging whether a feature should make it into a dot release
and I wouldn't complain any of them snuck a minor feature into one. If
one
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:17:27PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Fortunately, we'll be making feature releases every 6 months,
so this should not be a problem.
OK. Assuming the new release process works as intended, fine w/ me.
Maybe this should be clarified on the SVN / CVS FAQ pages?
--
Paul
I found this interesting enough to look into anyway... for anybody who
is interested, here's the scoop.
CA has 2 seats out of 9 on the Plone Foundation board. Apparently
there's special treatment of these seats via
http://plone.org/foundation/about/board/special_seats which is mostly a
perk to
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can
[Chris McDonough]
...
The Apache Software Foundation has 9 members
(http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/).
Their board of directors has 9 members, but the ASF has many more
members than that:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html
I don't recognize all the names, but at least
[Tim]
So, best guesses (please scream where I'm wrong):
- This is because service.py doesn't define a SvcShutdown method, just
a SvcStop method,
- It's a good idea to add a SvcShutdown method to service.py.
- It would suffice to add
SvcShutdown = SvcStop
to service.py.
If
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 23:05 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
From what I read from Rob in an interview in LWN, membership to the
foundation will be funded by membership dues.
Given that any actual facts and further discussions involving ZC have
been postponed to the IRC chat on
Am 17.06.2005 um 17:55 schrieb Zachery Bir:
I'm working on the head with some unchecked-in changes. The current
head incorporates the initial work in demangling ids.
Thanks for the info.
__Janko
___
Zope-PAS mailing list
Zope-PAS@zope.org
99 matches
Mail list logo
