On Friday, July 25, 2014 9:15:10 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Jul 2014, at 04:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 5:55:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 28 July 2014 04:51, John Clark johnk...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR liz...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness
As the
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 4:16:07 AM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 4:33 am, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
To be unconscious is not merely to lose the faculties which make our
quality of life human, but to lose all faculties.
Perhaps, but I
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding is that if comp is correct, it is both 3p and 1p correct.
Bruno's argument to me has been that comp is not correct in 1p. When I
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:26:13 PM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
A good thinking habit to cultivate is simplicity. Try and make it as
simple as you can.
Consciousness comes in two flavours (that I know of):
1. I know
2. I know that I know. (Presumably something to do with remembering
On Sunday, July 20, 2014 9:58:46 AM UTC-4, David Nyman wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=uhRhtFFhNzQ
This is a TED video of David Chalmers on the Hard Problem. His basic ideas
will be pretty well known to most of us on this list although
interestingly, he now
On Friday, July 18, 2014 3:08:40 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:02:18 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So often it becomes clear to me in debating the issues of consciousness
that they are missing something which cannot be replaced by logic. The way
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:25:07 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:22:46 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused
http://www.autism-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TOM-in-TD-and-ASD.pdf
This test was also originally devised by Wellman and Estes, and involves
asking the child what the brain is for. They found that *normal 3-4 year
olds already know that the brain has a set of mental functions*,
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused on using processes to
turn specific inputs into even more specific binary outputs. Very little
attention is paid to what inputs and outputs are or to the understanding of
what truth is in theoretical terms. The possibility of inputs is
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:53:43 AM UTC-4, David Nyman wrote:
On 16 July 2014 14:02, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
but I would say it is very likely that having mindreading-empathy deficits
on the autistic spectrum would tend to result in a strong bias against
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:06:27 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:02, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.autism-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TOM-in-TD-and-ASD.pdf
This test was also originally devised by Wellman and Estes, and involves
asking
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:22:46 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused on using processes
to turn specific inputs into even more specific binary outputs. Very little
attention is paid
place is not true or false.
Craig
Samiya
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Through the Wormhole: Is God an Alien Concept?
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1hexc7_is-god-an-alien-concept_shortfilms?start=2
http://www.dailymotion.com
Through the Wormhole: Is God an Alien Concept?
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1hexc7_is-god-an-alien-concept_shortfilms?start=2
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1hexc7_is-god-an-alien-concept_shortfilms?start=2
If you haven’t seen this episode, I highly recommend it.
Early on there is an
Nah, just more hype. Telling the judges that the computer was a 13 year old
who speaks English as a second language is tampering. Why not say that they
are developmentally disabled or a sociopath? No dice. At least they could
have used 13 year old judges.
On Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:34:10 PM
It seems much more sensible to me that bottom-up emergence and top-down
divergence are poles of a continuum of trans-causal interaction. I would
assume that there is also center-out and periphery-in interaction, as well
as other kinds of harmonic chords of coincident
On Monday, May 19, 2014 2:40:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2014, at 21:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:56:48 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2014, at 17:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Free Will Universe Model: Non-computability and its
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:59:10 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 19 May 2014 07:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
You did not provide evidence that they cannot do that.
His evidence was the negative answer to Hilbert's 10th problem.
To be exact, it's claimed
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:53:57 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:01:01PM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:34:40 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
This doesn't follow. An evolutionary algorithm with a real random
source, can
for itself and for civilization.
Craig
Jason
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
An interesting little thought experiment to consider: Is there a way to
create a program or AI moneybot which can figure out how to make more money
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 6:06:00 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 16 May 2014 08:22, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:19:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2014, at 14:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:34:55 PM UTC-4
On Friday, May 16, 2014 3:20:24 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2014, at 22:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:19:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2014, at 14:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:34:55 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
Free Will Universe Model: Non-computability and its relationship to the
‘hardware’ of our Universe
I saw his poster presentation at the TSC conference in Tucson and thought
it was pretty impressive. I'm not qualified to comment on the math, but I
don't see any obvious problems with his general
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:18:15 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 16 May 2014 08:29, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:55:12 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
Craig:
beautiful reply, appreciate your understanding and explanation.
H O W E V E R :
if we MIX
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:56:48 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 May 2014, at 17:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Free Will Universe Model: Non-computability and its relationship to the
‘hardware’ of our Universe
I saw his poster presentation at the TSC conference in Tucson and thought
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:34:40 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:43:23AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Free Will Universe Model: Non-computability and its relationship to the
‘hardware’ of our Universe
I saw his poster presentation at the TSC conference
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:34:55 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2014, at 03:45, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm showing that authenticity can be empirically demonstrated, and that
the failure of logic to detect the significance of authenticity can be
empirically demonstrated
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:19:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 May 2014, at 14:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:34:55 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2014, at 03:45, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm showing that authenticity can be empirically
have made it for this list. Applying 'singularity' to the
growth of technology is pretty weak, I agree. I guess someone decided it
needed a super-amazing name.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:10:11 PM UTC
An interesting little thought experiment to consider: Is there a way to
create a program or AI moneybot which can figure out how to make more money
on the internet than it costs?
I see this as a sneaky way to get at the trans-computable nature of
consciousness as it brings up issues about
100% free will, even though we might, as human beings, be nested so
deeply within the numbered and structured that we can barely recognize
their origin.
Craig
John Mikes
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
An interesting little thought
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:25:09 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014, LizR liz...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Comp isn't really a theory, so testing it is a bit problematic. It's
just a logical argument which purports to show the consequences of taking
seriously the
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:43:16 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:50:45 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 May 2014, at 03:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
We don't
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:56:53 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:43:16 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Craig
On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:50:45 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 May 2014, at 03:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
We don't know that. It could be the case that all detections used by the
abstraction of the universal machine are done by the sensory substrate in
which the machine-program
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona
agoc...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
In this -single universe- context, the fine tuning of the physical
constants are miracles by the way, so the hypothesis is true.
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:45:32 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona agoc
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 21:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:53:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 21:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, May 5, 2014 10:26:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
On Monday, May 5, 2014 9:12:45 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 3 May 2014 09:39, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 9:07:13 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
Do you believe that mathematical truths are true independent of mind?
I'm not sure what mind is. I
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:53:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 21:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, May 5, 2014 10:26:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Then you can study how to define sequence in that theory.
Only because you have an a priori expectation
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 3:53:48 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 May 2014, at 23:58, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, May 2, 2014 11:15:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 May 2014, at 20:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:23:13 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
On Monday, May 5, 2014 10:26:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 14:27, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 3:53:48 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 May 2014, at 23:58, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, May 2, 2014 11:15:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
Ruquist 20140501
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:23:13 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 20:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What generates Platonia?
Nothing generates Platonia, although
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 9:07:13 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 2 May 2014 04:42, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:23:13 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 20:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What generates Platonia?
Nothing
On Friday, May 2, 2014 11:15:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 May 2014, at 20:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:23:13 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 20:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What generates Platonia?
Nothing generates Platonia
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:23:13 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Apr 2014, at 20:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What generates Platonia?
Nothing generates Platonia, although addition and multiplication can
generate the comp-relevant part of platonia, that is the UD or equivalent
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 4:46:52 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Apr 2014, at 21:11, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:21:41 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 21:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:44:37 PM UTC-4, Bruno
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 4:46:52 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Apr 2014, at 21:11, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It seems like I just gave a perfectly legitimate, clear, and common
sense challenge, to which your response has no relation. You're talking
about remote
...@ulb.ac.bejavascript:
wrote:
On 13 Apr 2014, at 00:46, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can sense not be allowed to represent itself in your court of argument?
That is a very good idea.
That is quite close to what happens with the definition by Theatetus of
(rational) knowledge by saying
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 12:44:32 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 4/15/2014 4:38 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
An interesting related hypothesis is that language originated
from synesthesia caused by psychadelics.
Telmo.
I had heard that Telmo. Do you have a reference, a link?
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:21:41 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Apr 2014, at 21:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:44:37 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
snip
That my sun in law might not be a zombie/doll. Comp assumes that the
brain is Turing emulable
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:44:37 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Apr 2014, at 00:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:24:03 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Apr 2014, at 20:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, April 11, 2014 12:16:47
continued
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:44:37 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Apr 2014, at 00:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
and say that it is computation which is more likely derived from
awareness rather than the other way around, and therefore
computation in and of itself
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:32:19 AM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:24:03 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
We know that we cannot make our legs stand
On Friday, April 11, 2014 11:21:29 PM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
On 12 Apr 2014, at 4:47 am, spudb...@aol.com javascript: wrote:
Interesting, Professor Marchal. From what I have read some lucid dreamers
can actually feel the metal top of a car, or the feel of a wooden fence as
the dream
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:24:03 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Apr 2014, at 20:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, April 11, 2014 12:16:47 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 20:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:42:08 AM UTC-4
On Friday, April 11, 2014 12:16:47 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 20:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:42:08 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Craig,
I have already commented that type of non-argument. Once we get
closer
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:55:08 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 10 April 2014 04:09, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
Dreams need not have any possible evolutionary justification, since their
presence or absence is irrelevant to behavior.
My dream caused this thread
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:42:08 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Craig,
I have already commented that type of non-argument. Once we get closer to
a refutation of your attempt to show that your argument against comp is not
valid, you vindicate being illogical,
I don't vindicate
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:51:40 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 11 April 2014 02:17, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:55:08 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 10 April 2014 04:09, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Dreams need not have any
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:51:13 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 9 April 2014 04:58, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Monday, April 7, 2014 11:03:35 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
There is an element of this in all evolutionary explanations, but only
until we are in a position
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 4:58:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Apr 2014, at 21:33, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:13:09 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2014, at 19:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm not saying that I know it, I'm saying that it makes
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 5:42:18 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Apr 2014, at 22:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Another part 2
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:13:09 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2014, at 19:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I keep explaining
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:47:01 PM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:51:13 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 9 April 2014 04:58, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote
On Monday, April 7, 2014 11:03:35 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 8 April 2014 09:41, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Monday, April 7, 2014 4:38:42 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
2014-04-07 22:25 GMT+02:00 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com:
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 2
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:13:09 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2014, at 19:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, April 4, 2014 2:07:47 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 03:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:34:06 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal
Another part 2
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:13:09 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Apr 2014, at 19:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I keep explaining that arithmetic seen from inside escapes somehow the
mathematics accessible to the machine.
No need to keep explaining, I
On Saturday, April 5, 2014 3:42:10 PM UTC-4, Kim Jones wrote:
On 6 Apr 2014, at 2:23 am, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
It's just showing you that your awareness extends beyond your personal
definition of here and now
Finally you got
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:13:44 AM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 05:42:10AM +1000, Kim Jones wrote:
Finally you got to it. It was a precognitive dream. I have had many, an
enormous number throughout my life in fact, so I don't think we need to
beat about
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 2:45:35 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Probably you saw people visiting houses in your neighbourhood, but
that did not reached consciousnees you were busy thinking about other
things. (I will not insert here these funny videos of people failing
to recognize a
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 3:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Apr 2014, at 07:13, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 05:42:10AM +1000, Kim Jones wrote:
Finally you got to it. It was a precognitive dream. I have had
many, an enormous number throughout my
On Monday, April 7, 2014 4:38:42 PM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
2014-04-07 22:25 GMT+02:00 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 2:45:35 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
Probably you saw people visiting houses in your neighbourhood
On Saturday, April 5, 2014 1:35:26 AM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 5 April 2014 15:10, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
On Friday, April 4, 2014 6:00:09 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion
On Friday, April 4, 2014 2:07:47 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 03:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2014 2:34:06 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 21:34, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 1:00:54 PM UTC-4, Bruno
On Friday, April 4, 2014 2:07:47 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Apr 2014, at 03:40, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Logic is just required to be able to argue with others, and you do use
it, it seems to me, except that you seem to decide opportunistically to not
apply
On Friday, April 4, 2014 6:00:09 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
Last night just before I woke up I had a dream about a guy coming to the
door selling religion, so to speak - the details were a bit weird, as in
most dreams, but that was the gist of it - I sent him away, saying no
thanks we don't
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 7:21:29 PM UTC-4, Hal Ruhl wrote:
Hi everyone:
I am currently interested in two questions:
Does my model of why there are dynamic universes within the Everything
[latest version is below] include Bruno's Comp? Hi Bruno.
If life is inherently self
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 1:00:54 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Apr 2014, at 21:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I believe you, but all of the laws and creativity can still only occur in
the context of a sense making experience.
Did I ever said the contrary?
Yes, you are saying
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:40:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:35:18 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 27 March 2014 04:00, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:40:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:13:26 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 25 March 2014 07:36, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
He could make similar arguments claiming consciousness
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
Come on, the guy believe in Aristotelian theology, clearly without knowing
it, and he
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 4:49:48 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Mar 2014, at 19:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Continued...
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 4:54:41 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, March 21, 2014 4:44:20 AM UTC
Continued...
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 4:54:41 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, March 21, 2014 4:44:20 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Mar 2014, at 02:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I don't think logic can study reality, only
On Friday, March 21, 2014 1:04:46 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:48:30 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:01:43 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:19 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday
On Friday, March 21, 2014 2:11:17 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Friday, March 21, 2014 12:42:13 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm not so much interested in defining CTM, as in exploding the
assumptions from which CTM and other mechanistic, information-theoretical
models
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:05:08 AM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 20 March 2014 15:25, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
It means that birds squawk because they like the feeling and sound of it.
The intention of using the squawking to convey information is optional
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:09:39 AM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:25:44 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 10:06:37 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
But all the forms of language do share a common logical basis, according
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:01:43 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:19 AM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:09:39 AM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
It formed increasingly high-level associations between bundles of
sensory
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 5:02:15 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 22:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:18:58 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 17:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I'm mirroring back to you what my impression is of what
Another knife in the heart of CTM, IMO...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_speech
A striking feature of language is that it is modality-independent. Should
an impaired child be prevented from hearing or producing sound, its innate
capacity to master a language may equally find
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 10:06:37 PM UTC-4, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:24:33 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Another knife in the heart of CTM, IMO...
It took several minutes of Googling to find a plausible expansion of CTM,
at http://plato.stanford.edu
On Monday, March 17, 2014 12:19:23 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 19:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:05:50 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 13:52, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:41:30 AM UTC-4, Bruno
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:37:39 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 14:10, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 3:40:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 15 Mar 2014, at 23:09, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.jesseengland.net/index.php?/project/vide-uhhh
On Monday, March 17, 2014 12:58:44 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Mar 2014, at 23:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 4:38:42 PM UTC-4, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sunday, March
On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:17:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 17:50, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If someone said that they were agnostic about God, would I be wrong in
thinking that they do *not* assume God's presence or absence? To say that
you assume comp
On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:31:32 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 18:11, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I don't think it needs to be an experience to compute though. In real life
it does need to be an experience, because I think that it is the experience
which underlies all
1 - 100 of 3100 matches
Mail list logo
