Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Saturday, March 30, 2013 7:01:47 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 29 Mar 2013, at 13:14, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:21:59 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 28 Mar 2013, at 20:15, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:41:

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 30 Mar 2013, at 02:13, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Friday, March 29, 2013 1:59:44 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 Mar 2013, at 16:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:47:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2013/3/

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 29 Mar 2013, at 13:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Friday, March 29, 2013 5:41:19 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: > On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of >> "abstract thermod

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 29 Mar 2013, at 13:14, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:21:59 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 28 Mar 2013, at 20:15, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:41:22 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Mar 2013, at 17:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Tue

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Friday, March 29, 2013 1:59:44 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 29 Mar 2013, at 16:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:47:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal >> >>> >>

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 29 Mar 2013, at 16:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:47:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Intelligence,

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 29 Mar 2013, at 16:04, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal > > On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal > >> >> On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: >> >> On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of "abst

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Friday, March 29, 2013 10:47:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal > > >> >> On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: >> >> On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> Intelligence, in my opinion is ra

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 29 Mar 2013, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of "abstract thermodynamic", intelligence is when you get enough

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Friday, March 29, 2013 5:41:19 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: > > > On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of > >> "abstract thermodynamic", intelligence is when you g

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:21:59 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 28 Mar 2013, at 20:15, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:41:22 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 26 Mar 2013, at 17:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:13:

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 28 Mar 2013, at 20:15, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:41:22 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Mar 2013, at 17:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:13:09 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Mar 2013, at 13:35, Craig Weinberg wrote: It is i

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 28 Mar 2013, at 19:01, Richard Ruquist wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 28 Mar 2013, at 16:08, Richard Ruquist wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote: On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marcha

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

2013/3/29 Bruno Marchal > > On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: > > On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of >>> "abstract thermodynamic", intelligence is when you get enough heat while >>> young, something like t

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:59, meekerdb wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of "abstract thermodynamic", intelligence is when you get enough heat while young, something like that. It is close to courage, and it is w

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 28 Mar 2013, at 18:58, meekerdb wrote: On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: And if we decide the Mars Rover is conscious, can any test prove us wrong? Yes. But it is longer to explain than for comp. Strong AI is refutable in a weaker sense than comp. The refutation here are i

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 28 Mar 2013, at 16:08, Richard Ruquist wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote: >>> >>> On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> I can explain why

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Intelligence, in my opinion is rather easy too. It is a question of "abstract thermodynamic", intelligence is when you get enough heat while young, something like that. It is close to courage, and it is what make competence possible. ?? Competence

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/28/2013 7:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: And if we decide the Mars Rover is conscious, can any test prove us wrong? Yes. But it is longer to explain than for comp. Strong AI is refutable in a weaker sense than comp. The refutation here are indirect and based on the acceptance of the classic

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 28 Mar 2013, at 16:08, Richard Ruquist wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote: On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity, then the machine can al

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote: > > On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity, > then the machine can already understand that she cannot justify ratio

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:33, meekerdb wrote: On 3/26/2013 7:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: It is a bit what happens, please study the theory. Qualia are useful to accelerate information processing, and the integration of that processing in a person. And they are unavoidable for machines in rich

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote: On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity, then the machine can already understand that she cannot justify rationally the presence of its experience. No machine, nor us, ca

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:19:14 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: > > On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity, > then the machine can already understand that she cannot justify rationally > the presence of its experienc

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:33:11 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: > > On 3/26/2013 7:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > It is a bit what happens, please study the theory. Qualia are useful to > accelerate information processing, and the integration of that processing > in a person. And they are unavoid

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/26/2013 7:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: It is a bit what happens, please study the theory. Qualia are useful to accelerate information processing, and the integration of that processing in a person. And they are unavoidable for machines in rich and statistically stable universal relations wit

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity, then the machine can already understand that she cannot justify rationally the presence of its experience. No machine, nor us, can ever see how that could be true. It *is* in the

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 26 Mar 2013, at 13:35, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:21:39 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Mar 2013, at 19:35, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Monday, March 25, 2013 1:25:30 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Mar 2013, at 14:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Monda

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Monday, March 25, 2013 1:25:30 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 25 Mar 2013, at 14:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Monday, March 25, 2013 6:26:00 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Mar 2013, at 20:25, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 25 Mar 2013, at 14:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Monday, March 25, 2013 6:26:00 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 24 Mar 2013, at 20:25, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Sunday

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Monday, March 25, 2013 6:26:00 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 24 Mar 2013, at 20:25, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 24 Mar 2013, at 20:25, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursd

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 10:05:45 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/24/2013 8:00 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 6:15:53 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: >> >> >> On 3/24/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/24/2013 8:00 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 6:15:53 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/24/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Crai

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 6:15:53 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/24/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/24/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: > >> >> >> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Cr

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:44:01 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 24 Mar 2013, at 12:53, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://ww

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

John, On 22 Mar 2013, at 21:27, John Mikes wrote: I tried to find FOAR - but failed. You kindly advised to 'show me how' get subscribed, but it was missing from your post. Could you repeat it? You might try this: To post to this group, send email to f...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 7:13:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 21 Mar 2013, at 18:44, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex as a whole

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

I tried to find FOAR - but failed. You kindly advised to 'show me how' get subscribed, but it was missing from your post. Could you repeat it? John M On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Hi John, > > > On 21 Mar 2013, at 21:40, John Mikes wrote: > > Dear Bruno, > it is so fasc

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

Hi John, On 21 Mar 2013, at 21:40, John Mikes wrote: Dear Bruno, it is so fascinating to read about "universal machines". Is there a place where I could learn in short, understandable terms what they may be? Then again the difference between a 'Turing machine' and a 'physical computer' (wh

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/21/2013 4:40 PM, John Mikes wrote: > Dear Bruno, > it is so fascinating to read about "universal machines". > Is there a place where I could learn in short, understandable terms > what they may be? Then again the difference between a 'Turing machine' > and a 'physical computer' (what I usuall

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

Dear Bruno, it is so fascinating to read about "universal machines". Is there a place where I could learn in short, understandable terms what they may be? Then again the difference between a 'Turing machine' and a 'physical computer' (what I usually call our embryonic Kraxlwerk). I grew up into my

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 21 Mar 2013, at 02:32, Stephen P. King wrote: Are physical computers truly "universal Turing Machines"? No! They do not have infinite tape, not precise read/write heads. They are subject to noise and error. The infinite tape is not part of the universal machine. A universal machine i

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:28:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm > > "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex *as a whole*. The > brain is a non-stop, always-act

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex as a whole. The brain is a non-stop, always-active system. When we perceive something, the information does not end up in a sp

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 9:41 PM, meekerdb wrote: > On 3/20/2013 6:32 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: >> >> On 3/20/2013 6:37 PM, meekerdb wrote: >>> On 3/20/2013 2:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote: > On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> http://www.sci

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 6:32 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 3/20/2013 6:37 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 3/20/2013 2:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:52:20 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/20/2013 6:20 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:30:58 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: >> >> >> On 3/20/2013 4:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 2

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 6:37 PM, meekerdb wrote: > On 3/20/2013 2:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: >> >> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote: >>> On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining the activity in the cereb

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 6:20 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:30:58 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/20/2013 4:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: >> >> On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinbe

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 3:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:11:18 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: On 3/20/2013 1:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.s

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 2:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex /as a whole/. The brain is a non-stop, always-ac

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:11:18 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: > > On 3/20/2013 1:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: >> >> On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:30:58 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > > On 3/20/2013 4:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: >> >> On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 1:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 4:29 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: > > On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm >>

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, meekerdb wrote: > On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm >> >> "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex /as a >> whole/. The brain is a non-stop, always-active system. When we >> perceive some

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:07:10 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote: > > On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm > > "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex *as a whole*. The > brain is a non-stop, always-active syste

Re: 'Brain Waves' Challenge Area-Specific View of Brain Activity

On 3/20/2013 11:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320115111.htm "We are examining the activity in the cerebral cortex /as a whole/. The brain is a non-stop, always-active system. When we perceive something, the information does not end up in a specifi