Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Edit alpha as mask

2003-09-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I did post to gimp-devel: so that there may be a possibility to directly > edit the alpha channel of a layer (as there is the possibility of > directly painting onto only the blue layer, or red or green) in the > future. Please note that i

Re: [Gimp-developer] Making the color picker tool grab the alpha value

2003-09-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, here is my idea: we postpone this 121331 for 2.2 , and instead of > automatically picking opacity with the color picker, change the GIMP > in a way that thre is a current opacity, choosen as the alpha > component of the current foregroun

Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status

2003-09-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Michael Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > While a Screenshot plugin can be useful (easy enough to discover) it was > > never what I really what I wanted as a windows user. > > > > Rather I would have much preffered to be able to simply use the built in > > Print Scrn (or Alt+Print

Re: [Gimp-developer] "Save As" dialog bug?

2003-09-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Steven P. Ulrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > please find two screenshots of the "Save As | Determine File Type:" > menu. If this is a new feature, or if it's a new feature that just > doesn't work yet, please let me know :) I really can't think of any > better way to describe this other

Re: Clipboard (was Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status)

2003-09-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It should work that way but I haven't been able to build The GIMP to check > for ages now. > > To be completely clear: Edit/Cut, Copy and Paste _ought_ to transparently > work between applications. The image-related KDE apps get this right and > when G

Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status

2003-09-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Additionally the winsnap code requires currently an .rc file, and > taking care of that in plug-ins/common/Makefile.am would cause > additional pain. This argument is nil since we can always move screenshot to it's own subdirectory. I was hoping t

Re: Clipboard (was Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status)

2003-09-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any Free Desktop standard for routine image clipboard handling seems > to have been overtaken by events. There might still be room for some > discussion about hi-resolution or hi-precision graphics, but for the > average user the de facto standard is al

Re: Clipboard (was Re: [Gimp-developer] Screenshot plug-in status)

2003-09-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's a fairly big assumption :) 2.0 pre 1 (which will be > absolutely string & feature frozen to give translators, documentors > and the like time to clean up before 2.0) is planned for a > fortnights time. There are only 2 or 3 blockers left for th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Vector's PDB

2003-09-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How is the vector stuff? Are the itnernal representaions, if note > > all the touchs on the UI finished? > > People are waiting for me... I have spent as much time as I have > had in the last week or so on libart stroking. Hopefully a decent > run

Re: [Gimp-developer] PO files

2003-09-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone point me to a "howto" or explaination on how are the > files firstly generated? > > I usually run everything in English here, but I was browsing the > pt_BR.po, and it is looking a little worse than if the translations > were done

Re: [Gimp-developer] PO files

2003-09-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sure. README.i18n contains the basics of how to use gettext. > > The inaccurate Rough Guide is like this... you copy an existing > po template file to one named after your localisation, translate > the messages (being careful to use UTF-8), add the

Re: [Gimp-developer] PO files

2003-09-17 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is this the official new list for the GTP? If so README.i18n should be > changed. I might have missed something but what exactly do you think needs to be changed in README.i18n? Sven ___

Re: [Gimp-developer] Redo shortcut (was: Undo shortcut)

2003-09-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > However I *love* the Ctrl-R binding, especially because it lets me quickly > compare the done and undone versions of an image using a single hand with > very little effort. Try to do it with Ctrl-Z/Shift-Ctrl-Z and you'll find > that you need either very good coord

Re: [Gimp-developer] Layer Combination Modes - what files, please?

2003-09-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 22 September 2003 9:33 pm, Jeff Trefftzs wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been rooting through the source for gimp-1.3.20 looking in > > vain for the functions that handle the layer combination modes. > > Can someone please point me to th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Kudos to The GIMP Developers!

2003-09-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes: > BTW: Is it possible that there is a 3 Gig limit on per-process memory? > The machine has 6 GB, no ulimits and I got a "could not allocate x > bytes" message when I gave 3 Gig tile cache to GIMP (it took about 500 > Meg for other stuff, so I settled

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Kudos to The GIMP Developers!

2003-09-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Arranging for the GIMP to be able to generate PDFs with "text layers > as text" is on my "todo for 2.2" list. To get that done in sane way, you'd have to use a PDF Pango backend. There is such a beast but last I checked it wasn't working that

Re: [Gimp-developer] CVS - core/gimpdrawable.[ch] missing?

2003-09-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Ben Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 23 September 2003 10:03 pm, Simon Budig wrote: > > Simply "cvs update" your local tree again. A broken pipe can happen and > > is nothing to worry about. We can do nothing about that. > > No, I meant that the broken pipe happened during t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Mailing list archive out of date

2003-09-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes: > I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.>=19 > and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives. They aren't publically announced but the URL appeared here earlier (http://gimp.org/win32/gimp-head.zip). > The archi

Re: 2.2 features. was: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Kudos to The GIMP Developers!

2003-09-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I have never enve looked at Pango. You will not get around it, see below. > My idea would be to get the text chars and attributtes from the > GIMP, generate a image without the text only layers with no other > layers above it, and "hand

Re: Gimp printing UI - was Re: [Gimp-developer] Update on pre-release schedule

2003-09-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don´t know who will be doing it, but it was not until this week that > I noted taht there is no way of printing more than one coppy at once > with the print GUI. Not in 1.2.5 at last (at work is what I use. At > home, I have no wrking pri

Re: Gimp printing UI - was Re: [Gimp-developer] Update on pre-release schedule

2003-09-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> And also, if it cannot be made possible to spread a image over several >> pages and tile the results, as that would be too much change, the >> possibility of making the printable image larger than the printer >> printable area

Re: [Gimp-developer] Redo shortcut

2003-09-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I wonder when and why the terminology of hardcoding a keybinding was introduced into this discussion. I simply don't understand it's meaning. If you think about having two different keybindings bound to a single menu entry, this is AFAIK not possible with GTK+-2.x. And I can't think of any oth

Re: [Gimp-developer] Converting old plug-ins to wirk with gimp-1.3.20 (gimp-2)

2003-09-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > As we are about to move to the next stage of gimpery, I have begun > looking closely at my large collection of plug-ins, many of which I > remember compiling with GIMP_ENABLE_COMPAT_CRUFT, and wondering how > to make them usable again u

Re: [Gimp-developer] Converting old plug-ins to wirk with gimp-1.3.20 (gimp-2)

2003-09-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:44, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > If your plug-in still needs GIMP_ENABLE_COMPAT_CRUFT, it hasn't been > > ported to gimp-1.2 yet. Of course you need to do that first. > > > > Do I n

Re: [Gimp-developer] When will we branch CVS gimp-2-0?

2003-10-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suggest to create that branch immediately after the 1.3.21 release. > What do you think? We create a branch immidiately after 2.0 is released. We don't have the resources to handle more branches. If you branch now (or after 1.3.21), we will neve

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: Redo shortcut

2003-10-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It does not "only seem to match text editors and browsers". The first > examples of shortcuts that were posted at the beginning of this > discussion (previous thread) mentioned the shortcuts used in Photoshop > and Paint Shop Pro on Mac and Window

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: [Bug 123647] Changed - Allow attaching additional (hidden) keybindings (accelerators) to menu entries]

2003-10-01 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tom Mraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI (multiple keybindings per menu action in GTK+). > > As I see it will be implemented in GTK+ 2.4 I vote for leaving the > current redo keybinding as is and wait for GTK+ 2.4 with the change. The new menu API in GTK+-2.4 will solve quite a few of our

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: [Bug 123647] Changed - Allow attaching additional (hidden) keybindings (accelerators) to menu entries]

2003-10-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:34:25 +0200, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If this is an almost-concensus (only myself, Alan Horkan and > > Raphael seem to like the change), it seems reasonable to revert > > the redo shortcut to Ctrl-R. > > Ple

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: [Bug 123647] Changed - Allow attaching additional (hidden) keybindings (accelerators) to menu entries]

2003-10-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes: > I would not change the shortcut if it "will be changed with GTK 2.4" > anyway. Just stick with CTRL-R. This way, we can later provide an > alternative "more sane" extra shortcut using GTK 2.4. I don't think we ever want a second shortcut for anythi

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: [Bug 123647] Changed - Allow attaching additional (hidden) keybindings (accelerators) to menu entries]

2003-10-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ctrl-Y is the shortcut used by most Windows applications (except for > Photoshop and Paint Shop Pro, using Ctrl-Shift-Z and Ctrl-Alt-Z) As far as I understood, Photoshop uses Ctrl-Z for redo. Actually a redo in PS is just an undo of the previous u

Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move

2003-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The web team says it's ready to move, several developers have said > they want it to move now, I just wanted to sort out what exactly is > preventing the website move. > > What needs to be done to get www pointing at mmmaybe, and get wwwas > pointing

mailing list problems (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move)

2003-10-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P.S.: Dave, you mentioned that you had problems subscribing to the > gimp-web list. I remember having had some problems as well, but > I eventually found a way to make it work. I don't remember > exactly how but there are severa

[Gimp-developer] GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I've updated the online version of the GIMP 1.3 API reference at http://developer.gimp.org/api/1.3/ Thanks to the help of Mitch and DinDinX, the documentation has improved since version 1.3.20. However there is still a lot of work to do. We'd like to concentrate on documentation of the lib

[Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, here are some stats on the current state of the documentation of our libraries: libgimp 77% symbol docs coverage. 365 symbols documented. 110 not documented. libgimpbase 21% symbol docs coverage. 27 symbols documented. 104 not documented. libgimpcolor 3% symbol docs c

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will > point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns, > including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the > latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.21 made it to slashdot.

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3) The GIMP does not really try to compete with Sodipodi. > Naturally there are points where the scope of the GIMP and Sodipodi > overlap, but right now we are only talking about a reimplementation > of a tool that has been in the GIMP

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-1.3.21, fontconfig-2.2+ configure problems

2003-10-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Jeff Trefftzs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does gimp-1.3.21 suddenly need fontconfig-2.2.0 or greater, where > gimp-1.3.20 didn't? It turned out that GIMP-1.3.20 already needed it. It crashed on people that tried to use it with earlier fontconfig versions. That's why we added a compile time

[Gimp-developer] [Fwd: 2003 Linux Journal Readers' Choice Awards]

2003-10-09 Thread Sven Neumann
And the winner is ... --- Begin Message --- Congratulations -- you have won the 2003 Linux Journal Readers' Choice Awards! This year over 7,500 readers visited the Linux Journal web site and voted on their favorites in 28 categories. Voting took place between June 30 and July 25, 2003, and was o

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As was discussed at Gimp Con 2003 (and before, frankly) I am in the > process of incorporating "The GIMP Foundation" as a non-profit > organization devoted to supporting the gimp. Thanks a lot for organizing this. > Here are some of the ideas I am

[Gimp-developer] GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I sent a similar mail to the gimp-developer list last week but since there was no feedback I assume that our developers are all too busy to help with the documentation. So I am trying again here... One of the goals of current GIMP development is to make the code easier to read and understand

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] The Gimp Foundation

2003-10-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > > This sounds a lot more like an attempt to bring WilberWorks > > Wilber what? I plead ignorant. Oh well, one should really run one's own internet archive. The website seems bought off and

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] Improvements for the new web site (summary - requests for discussion)

2003-10-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The early splash screens were a mess to get from CVS. They were > moved all around and the version number changed often. They were a > nightmare to retrieve; thank goodness yosh did it. We still move things around and I would even like to rename t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, could you try to sound less demanding and instead put a little more effort into explaining what exactly you mean. I couldn't make much sense out of your mail. Please try again. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Piotr Legiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, the gray point tool from Levels dialog IMHO takes the measure > from really huge image are. I could not find how to decrease this. By default the tool doesn't average at all so it takes the color from a single pixel (this default should proba

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] Improvements for the new web site (summary - requests for discussion)

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 18 Oct 2003 12:10:07 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We still move things around and I would even like to rename the file > > once more. But a simple list of GIMP versions with splash filename

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is good stuff. I have been aware of these problems, and I am > incorporating their solutions into the compositing core that will > eventually become a part of gimp (gegl). What you are essentially > describing is the Rec. 601 converstion from

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-21 Thread Sven Neumann
ver a 3x3 square. The default for the Color Picker tool (which is used from the Paint tools as well) didn't change. I'm including the ChangeLog entry in case anyone here is interested to learn where such default values live in the code: 2003-10-21 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Gimp-developer] Don't forget this important bug.

2003-10-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Danni Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just looked at the list of bugs to be fixed before 2.0pre and I > would urge you to include fixing the behaviour where the Cursor > switches back to the mouse everytime a pen tablet is over the main > toolbox. Although this can be worked around It will

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Piotr Legiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) Levels dialog - *linear* histogram as in histogram tool. I've done some changes and the histogram scale is now part of the tool-options of all tools that use a histogram. This means you can choose between linear and logorithmic in all those to

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.x milestone bugs

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, here are some comments on the list of bugs that David Neary posted: > 113033Thumbnail PDB API for Plug-Ins I am working on this one. Yeah, I keep saying that for a while but the code isn't ready for CVS and at some point I lost interest. But I'm sure I will get back to it soon. > 12

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.x milestone bugs

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got a mail from David Odin proposing to work on some of the API > clean-up (specifically, he proposed addressing the gimp_dialog_new > () bug) - I asked him to send the same mail to the list. Mitch is working on this already and said he will return

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status update on 1.3.x

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 78064 Entering large dimensions in Scale Image causes fatal > error > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78064 > > There has been some discussion on this bug. Personally, I think > checking the new image size against the large im

[Gimp-developer] more tasks, the preferences and user install dialogs

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, there are two more tasks that should be addressed in a short time frame even though they aren't really blocking any prerelease, This is because they might involve some string changes and we would like to get these done as early as possible to give translators a chance to polish the translation

Re: [Gimp-developer] Major corrections in Curves and Levels dialogs.

2003-10-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, for those of you who want to follow the discussion about improvements to the Levels and Curves tools, here's a list of relevant bug reports with some comments. I'm adding the user list to the Cc: since feedback from users would be very helpful at this. Improve color pickers in Levels tool

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-freetype-0.3 plugin

2003-10-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed Mdk 9.2 and Gimp-1.3.21 went on without any trouble (Hooray!) > > gimp-freetype-0.3 failed in make > > main.c:147: error: too few arguments to function `gimp_plugin_help_register' > make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 1 The version from CVS, module "gimp-f

[Gimp-developer] another hack: Message Window(s)

2003-10-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, here's another thing that I thought would be a nice hack for someone who wants to play with the GIMP code w/o going into too much detail. Some interest in GTK+ is required though. Everyone hates it when two or three error messages popup for a single error. You end up seeing the last error mes

Re: [Gimp-developer] another hack: Message Window(s)

2003-10-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I wrote earlier: > Perhaps there should also be a bug-report about this issue... There is this one: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92604 Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listin

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-freetype-0.3 plugin

2003-10-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tal Danzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the freetype plugin still needed with the new text tool that's in > GIMP 1.3? The only things I can think of that were in the freetype > plugin, not in the text tool are text rotation and character spacing > (both useful functions). The text trans

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-freetype-0.3 plugin

2003-10-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > The text transformations are supposed to make it into GIMP-2.0 but > I'm afraid that letter spacing will have to wait. Just in case somone cares, here are links to the relevant bug reports: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125144

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp histogram bug?

2003-10-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Piotr Legiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone explain me, how it is possible: > http://main.pam.szczecin.pl/~piotrlg/t/gimp-bug-hist.jpg > > Percentile also gives strange results. I understand your problem with the mean value but what is strange about the value displayed for perc

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp histogram bug?

2003-10-30 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > > Can someone explain me, how it is possible: > > http://main.pam.szczecin.pl/~piotrlg/t/gimp-bug-hist.jpg > > > > Percentile also gives strange results. I think I fixed the Histogram issues in CVS now. The tool was indeed horribly broken. Next time however, please use Bugzilla to report s

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP

2003-10-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on gimpwin-users: > > > [...] If you are involved in the GIMP v1.3/2.0 project > > (ie; the new GIMP), please feel free to include my custom brushes > > (or any of my other offerings) with your work (they are GPL'd). > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16 new brushes for the GIMP

2003-10-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would call them a "Boutique" collection of brushes and not really > a default set. The question was whether these brushes would be a useful addition to the default set. Brush categories will have to wait till 2.2 probably; see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/s

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.22

2003-11-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hey GIMPers, there's a new development snapshot in the 1.3 series of The GIMP, version 1.3.22, now available for download from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.3/v1.3.22/ or from one of the mirrors listed at http://gimp.org/download.html This release focuses on bug fixes and thus it should be t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > and also libgimpbase/gimpwin32-io.h > > That probably should be added to libgimbase/Makefile.am's EXTRA_DIST? > The EXTRA_HEADERS macro doesn't seem to be used for anything in the > generated Makefile? I don't think EXTRA_HEADERS is a valid aut

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Piotr Legiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to have a glimpse of what and *when* gimp is going to make > next big step (after 2.0 release), or in other words when gimp is > going to use gegl? We are considering a slow migration towards GEGL since we want to avoid another large rewr

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, one more thing: Would you mind to finally add the information to Bugzilla that I keep asking for? You are opening bug reports and people express their interest to implement the features you are asking for. But when asking for more feedback, you keep quiet. This is certainly not a good way to m

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > avoid another large rewrite of the GIMP that would cause another > > endless development cycle. So at the moment we consi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I wrote: > we consider to start by replacing GimpColor with GeglColor. ^ That should read GimpRGB of course. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/l

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which brings up an interesting question -- how can an open source > project accurately represent what is going on in developmentland on > its web site? It's more of a question to ponder -- I don't have the > answer myself. On first thought,

Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpDialog API change

2003-11-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > After all, I think this API change is best committed atomically, > > so I'll just continue hacking the plug-ins and commit everything > > today or tomorrow. > > If you think you'll be done that quickly, that's perhaps best. >From looking over Mitc

[Gimp-developer] Digital Photography and the GIMP

2003-11-06 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, here's a nice URL that I'd like to share with you: http://hs.riverdale.k12.or.us/~pnelson/gimp/index.html Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dicom plug-in for gimp

2003-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Dov Grobgeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps we need a browser function for accessing a remote site with > installable plug-ins, just like the "extensions" and plug-ins available > in MozillaFirebird. It might also be coupled with an "update" function > that retrieves the latest version

Re: [Gimp-developer] Status of gegl, gimp 3.0?

2003-11-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which brings up an interesting question -- how can an open source > project accurately represent what is going on in developmentland on > its web site? One thing I could imagine would be some sort of regular news update on GIMP development. S

Re: [Gimp-developer] Update on the road to 2.0

2003-11-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK - so there's the summary. Not a huge amount of movement on these, > but we're going in the right direction. Dave, please do a CVS diff between the date of your last mail and today. Then say this again. Actually we have made a lot of progress, not

Re: [Gimp-developer] Update on the road to 2.0

2003-11-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, all well understood but progress reports should be motivating. So it's important to also mentioned all the good things that have happened. Otherwise the report will have the opposite effect of what it was written for. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailin

Re: [Gimp-developer] Update on the road to 2.0

2003-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Apologies if the tone seemed a little negative. There's no need to apologize, no offense was taken. Let me then try to come up with a summary of all the things that happened, not mentioning the changes that didn't yet happen: - GIMP can now be used

Re: [Gimp-developer] Film Gimp brushes

2003-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - We now support loading of GIMP brush format version 3. That is the > > format that was introduced by the FilmGimp or CinePaint developers > > (I don't know exactly when this change was made). > > CinePaint has made no changes to GIMP file fo

[Gimp-developer] developer.gimp.org now in CVS

2003-11-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, just wanted to let you know that the source for the developer.gimp.org web-site is now in CVS. The CVS module is gimp-web-devel and thanks to Yosh the site is automatically updated on CVS commits. The RSS feed doesn't update regularily yet but this should be fixed soon. The site is build usin

[Gimp-developer] [OpenOSX Sales ] Fwd: Gimp 1.3.22 on Mac OS 10.3.1

2003-11-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, forwarding this to the list... --- Begin Message --- Hello, Sorry to disturb you. I have attempted sending a message several times to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and I am subscribed but it is not appearing on the list. I cannot find an adminstrator address, so I am contacting you. I fear that a

[Gimp-developer] Re: Fwd: Gimp 1.3.22 on Mac OS 10.3.1

2003-11-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, OpenOSX Sales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am attempting to build Gimp 1.3.22 here on Mac OS X 10.3.1 (darwin > 7.0) with gcc 3.3 and all goes well until what appears to be the > final linking stages at which point I get several undefined symbols. > > ld: Undefined symbols: > gimp_containe

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP at COMDEX

2003-11-13 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > He might not forgive me for this, but here's jimmac's list of > user visible changes in 2.0 when compared to 1.2: > http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/private/gimp-2/html/index.xhtml That's a nice draft (not sure though if Jimmac will be happy about se

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://www.blackfiveservices.co.uk/separate.shtml I am pointing people at this plug-in for quite a while already. > I hacked together a plugin some time ago that uses the LCMS > colour-management library to convert images from RGB to CMYK,

Re: [Gimp-developer] AUTHORS.xml

2003-11-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2) what sort of information should be included there. it is an > interesting area. Some contributers might be looking for jobs (or > dates) and would like to have email and homepage and maybe annual income > goals -- shoe size, i dunno. Others mig

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know that there is at least one prospective sponsor who has > said he will put some money (perhaps 4 figures) towards the > conference - a few more like that and we will not have problems > paying travel expenses (depending, of course, on the locati

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Carol Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My questions can all be answered very simply. None of your questions make any sense (at least not to me). > How much money is there? What money are you talking about? > Who contributed it? ditto > For what reason was it contributed? dit

Re: [Gimp-developer] Weekly Progress Report on GIMP development

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > - A couple of other issues with the libgimp* APIs have been > > resolved. The APIs should be ready for GIMP-2.0 now. Only the > > addition of libgimpthumb is still missing in

Re: [Gimp-developer] removing duplicate names from our data collection

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "Steven P. Ulrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Could you please send me, or tell me how to get, the files that I > would need to rename, The files are in the GIMP source tree, preferably the latest released tarball (1.3.22) or a CVS checkout. We are talking about the standard set of bru

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GimpCon 2004

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > > Who contributed it? > > FSF Europe, ORA, FlamingText GIMP and someone else I can't > remember gave us money for the last conference, of which 400 > euros remains. Apple also lent us some equipment. Please let me get things straight on the fundings for the GIMP Developers Conference this

Re: [Gimp-developer] COMDEX debrief

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi Daniel, thanks for what you are doing in Vegas. I was surprised when I heard that you offered to go there even though it looked like there would be no financial support whatsoever. Nice that it turned out that you won't have to pay everything yourself. I am certain you are doing a good job and

[Gimp-developer] Weekly Progress Report on GIMP development

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, a week has gone by since the last progress report so it's about time for a short update on what has changed in GIMP CVS. - Yosh added new functions to libgimpwidgets that provide a 64bit clean interface for option menus and radio groups. This fixes bug #125142. - A couple of other issues

[Gimp-developer] removing duplicate names from our data collection

2003-11-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, here's an easy task for a potential contributor: At the moment a few of the brushes (and perhaps other data files as well) that we distribute with the GIMP tarball, have the same name. An example are the three "Pencil Sketch" brushes which should probably have the pixel size added to their nam

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: [Gimp-developer] GimpCon 2004 (follow-up)

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In this case, what IT events do people know of in the timescale > we're looking at? GUADEC obviously fits, the Chemnitz event is a > little early for my tastes, but is certainly an option. What other > events are there that people know about? Well, t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This would be fine for unix based systems too. Are there any plans > to create an system interface for X to plug-in an CMM? Do You know > someone allready working on this? X11 has support for color management for a lng time already. What ex

Re: [Gimp-developer] Fwd: [GUG] CMYK under Gimp.

2003-11-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have gimps configure an header check for lcms allready onboard? This > would help plug-ins to easily link against liblcms? I don't see how a configure check in GIMP would help plug-ins so the answer to the question doesn't really matter. I'll gi

Re: [Gimp-developer] About libgimp/gimpmisc* files

2003-11-23 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Most of the functions of gimpmiscui.h are related to the > GimpFixmePreview stuff. This part looks pretty useful to me, and the > API is clean enough to be kept imho. The only bad point I see here > is that this code use the deprecated widget GtkPrevie

Re: [Gimp-developer] What makes the GIMP toolbox special?

2003-11-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, RaphaÃl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Following the discussion in bug #115092 and according to Sven's > suggestion, I am moving a part of the discussion here: what is > special about the GIMP toolbox, from a user's point of view? What > makes it different from the other docks? The to

[Gimp-developer] Porting plug-ins to GIMP-1.3.23

2003-11-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, if you have plug-ins that used to work with GIMP-1.3, you will most probably notice that they don't work with 1.3.23 any longer. If you try to recompile them, you will notice that there are some incompatible changes in libgimpwidgets. The changes were absolutely needed and are quite small. Let

Re: [Gimp-developer] What makes the GIMP toolbox special?

2003-11-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, RaphaÃl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You can already add a tools list/grid to whatever dock you like. > > But this list or grid of tools does not behave like the one in the > toolbox, unfortunately. The grid view does not behave as set of > buttons (different background color, no

Re: [Gimp-developer] What makes the GIMP toolbox special?

2003-11-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, RaphaÃl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am questioning this because I think that the fact that the toolbox > is "special" is an artificial limitation that should go away in a > future release in order to make the user interface more consistent and > easier to use. This discussion is a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >