everyone beginning to look elsewhere?
3.) In addition, is vpopmaild still something on the roadmap for vpopmail? Or
has it gone away entirely?
Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
urce and converting strings wherever necessary.
It'd definitely be nice to get this fixed. That "First+Last" bug
in vqadmin (and possibly qmailadmin) is really annoying. :(
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
ir there.
>
> There is no a real increase in performance from ext3 to Reiserfs when you
> handle such maildirs.
>
> Better looking for a faster disk or a faster machine.
Has anyone here tried Binc IMAP instead of Courier IMAP? Is it
any faster for large maildirs? I've been won
mend reiserfs on a
production machine. One good system crash/power outage and you can kiss
your data good-bye. I know from personal experience. Reiserfs4 *may*
change all of that. We'll see. But until then I highly recommend EXT3.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
Hello,
Does anyone know how I can get ip alias capability
working with Horde IMP and vpopmail?
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
ntry for the sent
> message, no errors.
> I've tryed to reinstall sqwebmail, but the problem persists.
This is an sqwebmail problem. Try asking on the sqwebmail list. And BTW,
it sounds like there is a problem with your sendit.sh script.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET
ixated on qmail and for some
> >reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA.
> >
> >-Steve
>
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> http://www.anastrophe.com
> http://www.smileglobal.com
>
>
>
>
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
of my personal time
into.
For those of you who have had the opportunity to work with BOTH
systems, which do you prefer and why?
BTW, I currently run QMail + vpopmail & friends + courier-imap + sqwebmail.
Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. B
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 1:25 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:03 pm, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:42 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is something we built into vpopmail for sites like
the
> file and send them over to the mysql server when it becomes
> available.
That's neat. In which version was this feature added?
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 6:10 PM
> Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail + billing server integration
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
ory and having something
> on your billing server update that?
It's been suggested. I'm not happy with that solution though. I'd rather keep
it command line based.
> (Or, alternatively, why not run the
> MySQL database on your billing server if you go that route?
Kills sca
he
queued operations begin to execute.
However, so far in my google searches I haven't seen anything
that would help me implement a persistent SSH connection
with a FIFO queue.
Can anyone give me tips?
Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 26
On Monday 04 August 2003 13:22, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Monday 04 August 2003 11:20, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So, my question is this:
> >
> > Did logging get turned off because I specified both mysql
> > AND syslog logging? If so, why didn&#x
On Monday 04 August 2003 11:20, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
[...]
> So, my question is this:
>
> Did logging get turned off because I specified both mysql
> AND syslog logging? If so, why didn't vpopmail tell me that?
>
> Or is there something else going on here?
Hmmm aft
ave pop3d: and imapd: statements
in my logs, which I assume come from my courier
daemons.
So, my question is this:
Did logging get turned off because I specified both mysql
AND syslog logging? If so, why didn't vpopmail tell me that?
Or is there something else going on here?
Any help apprecia
On Saturday 26 July 2003 12:19, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Saturday 26 July 2003 09:07, Tom Collins wrote:
> > On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 05:28 AM, Hani Mouneimne wrote:
> > > vdelivermail.c: In function `date_header':
> > > vdelivermail.c:
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 15:58, Jens Jahr wrote:
> Sérgio Manuel Rosa wrote:
> > Jesse Guardiani writes:
> >> On Monday 28 July 2003 20:05, Sérgio Manuel Rosa wrote:
> >>> Hi List,
> >>> I've got to build a new server. This server is going to hold a
n the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
On Monday 28 July 2003 20:05, Sérgio Manuel Rosa wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I've got to build a new server. This server is going to hold a great number
> of users and a lot of traffic.
>
> My question is: should I use mySQL, ldap or none?
MySQL. Without a doubt.
--
J
t be used uninitialized in this
> > function
>
> Please send a copy of /usr/local/time.h so I can see how timezone is
> defined.
Don't know if someone already sent this to you directly, but I am sending
you /usr/include/time.h from FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and 5.1-RELEASE.
/usr/local/
rands to binary /
> vdelivermail.c:1321: warning: `tz' might be used uninitialized in this
> function
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/home/smooth/vpopmail-5.3.23.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/home/smooth/vpopmail-5.3.23.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop
D], and @domain will point to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Can this be done?
Have you tried a simple vpopmail domain alias?
Or are you wanting to actually COPY mail
between the two domains?
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
axaliases: 51
> >maxforwards: 51
> >maxautoresponders: 51
> >maxmailinglists: 51
> >default_quota: 1S,5000C
> >
> >is it true i'd add the domain quota as
> >
> > quota xxx
> >
> >rather than
> >
> >
, last
> >> door on your left.
Could you describe the symptoms? Is it an authdaemon issue? I don't have any
background to work with here.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5
On Friday 14 March 2003 10:28, Dave Weiner wrote:
> Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> >> Actually, thinking about it, not everybody using vpopmail uses
> >> squirrelmail so this would be better as a separate tool, or possibly
> >> integrated with qmailadmin.
> >
> >
mail there. Or, making sure a defunct filter rule is deleted when the
user deletes a folder in their webmail client.)
With that in mind, it makes a lot of sense to put this functionality in
the webmail client. (But note that sqwebmail does NOT currently delete
a filter if it's corresponding folder
Never use authdaemon with vchkpw. It's buggy for some reason. Authentications
will fail randomly and such. And yes, you should use authvchkpw.
>
> > Thanks,
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v
FAQ from vpopmail 5.2.1 states that --enable-hardquota will
set up user quotas in vpopmail, but the changelog states
the following:
01/05/02 - change --enable-hardquota to --enable-defaultquota
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN
FAQ in vpopmail 5.2.1 states that the default time to clear a POP before
SMTP relay is 60 minutes.
The configure script sets it to 180 minutes by default.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559
hat, have you compiled vpopmail lately without recompiling courier?
Good luck.
> bird
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies tha
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp filter proxy
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > > > If I don't allow email to come into my network with forged FROM
> > > > headers(or even forge
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp filter proxy
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > If I don't allow email to come into my network with forged FROM
> > headers(or even forged envelo
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Jesse Guardian
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp filter proxy
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > Will qmail-queue give me access to the RELAYCLIENT environment variable?
>
> It should, as it's a
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19
> > Exactly. As in when your people add the new user, your billing table has
> > an expiry date. Every week/month/whatever
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] tcp.smtp file perms/owns for -enable-roaming-users?
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > First off, I didn't write the text you just replied to. That was written b
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] tcp.smtp file perms/owns for -enable-roaming-users?
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > His ~vpopmail/etc/open-smtp a file I should have manually created
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Pasche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp filter proxy
> Hi Jesse,
>
> > I'd like to insert an SMTP filter proxy between tcpserver and qmail
> > (or, in my case: rblsmtpd
claiming to be from one of my customers.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long
distance faxing and want to
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] POP before SMTP vs rcpthosts
> Howdy list,
>
> I'm confused about something. Why d
Howdy list,
I'm confused about something. Why do we need POP before SMTP? Don't the rcpthosts and
morercpthosts files offer the same
functionality?
Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v
d by tcpserver) from both tcp.smtp and
> > open-smtp.
> >
> > In short, you need:
> >
> > - read permissions on tcp.smtp
> > - write permissions on tcp.smtp.cdb
> >
> > Judge for yourself if relaying data is sensible or not, to decide if you
> > want these
t, you need:
>
> - read permissions on tcp.smtp
> - write permissions on tcp.smtp.cdb
>
> Judge for yourself if relaying data is sensible or not, to decide if you
> want these files to be group- or world-readable, or not.
>
> Jonas
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
llective list of
things to do in the future. I might be interested in working on it
once I get out from under this mound of other things to do.
It wouldn't hurt to discuss implementation in the meantime. That way
whoever decides to code it wouldn't have to actually think, just code.
&g
On Friday 07 March 2003 12:29, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:15 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > So, Bill, why don't you think Ken might not sign off on this?
>
> Because I can't read his mind. I put together what I think is
> appropriate. Tha
On Friday 07 March 2003 10:13, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2003 09:47, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Brian Kolaci wrote:
>
> Hang on. I think I just realized what I've been missing
> the entire time:
>
> The USER QUOTA
On Friday 07 March 2003 09:47, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Brian Kolaci wrote:
Hang on. I think I just realized what I've been missing
the entire time:
The USER QUOTAS still work! That means that maildrop and
courier still enforce them.
But when you create
--enable-mysql-limits, then the file
will STILL exist, but it can either be read directly, or syncronized
with an identical value in the .qmailadmin-limits file ("quota 50", etc...).
Does this sound reasonable? I'm not trying to kill functionality here!
I'm trying to save it by al
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question
> On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Brian Kolaci wrote:
>
> > I guess I wasn't explicit enough. I assumed pe
scratches it, and everyone benefits, right?
> >
> > Lets talk. If you're willing to help me hammer out an idea that works,
> > then I'll pitch it to Mr. Sam. If we do a good job and it makes sense,
> > then I doubt he'll object as long as I do most of
ches it,
and everyone benefits, right?
Lets talk. If you're willing to help me hammer out an idea that works,
then I'll pitch it to Mr. Sam. If we do a good job and it makes sense,
then I doubt he'll object as long as I do most of the coding and he
doesn't have to.
>
> Br
ented in a way
that Courier-IMAP and other programs can live with. It should be standardized,
otherwise vpopmail will be implementing a feature that no-one else can
realistically use without linking vpopmail's libraries into their code
(which I mentioned in another thread as being a bit of a pain s
On Thursday 06 March 2003 13:20, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> I'd be curious to see if Mr. Sam accepts such patches. I personally
> think that this new non-system domain quota feature is unnecessary,
> when system quo
On Thursday 06 March 2003 11:28, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > Howdy list,
> >
> > I'm just wondering a few things about the new domain wide quotas:
> >
> > Are these quotas implemented in vdelivermail
r deletes a message from the
maildir? Is the quota then incorrect? I use Courier-IMAP.
Is there a way to recalculate a user's maildir quota via command line?
(For instance, so that all of my user's quotas could be recalculated at
4 AM from scratch via a shell script or Perl script?
ssage,
will it throw the quotas off?)
Thanks!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long
distance faxing and want t
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> I know this is off topic and technically in the wrong list, but
> I thought one of you might have run into this before:
>
> My qmail-1.03 has the tarpitting patch and the oversized dns packet
> patc
oblem with qmail seemingly not reading
morercpthost before?
The corresponding CDB is updated properly.
THanks,
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are act
- Original Message -
From: "Ihsan Turkmen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:35 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] qmail-pop3d does not run with tcpserver
> 1. I can make qmail-pop3d run with xined ,but it does not run with
> tcpserver.
> 2. /var/log/qmail-po
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:06, Doug Clements wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, Febru
ng comments are written just to clarify some of my reasoning,
NOT the say, "Hey! I want a module interface and I want it NOW!"
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:06, Doug Clements wrote:
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 02:56, Dave Weiner wrote:
> On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:56, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > OK. Again, I admit lack of experience here. But, it still seems like a
> > vpopmail specific protocol would be faster than transfering and modifying
> >
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:10, Doug Clements wrote:
> If you don't mind my asking, why don't you care for NFS?
I just never heard anything good about it. Honest misconception
I suppose.
>
> --Doug
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Guardiani
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kolaci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> Like I said before, we already have the daemons. That's
> qmail-smtpd, authdaemond, and t
it of discussion, here goes:
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail exte
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kolaci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, I don't see the need. vpopmail was made for qmail.
> Qmail invokes vpopmail u
- Original Message -
From: "Anders Brander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail as a daemon
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 23 February 2003 19:03, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> &g
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Clements" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "vpopmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail extension modules
> --
You're right. I don't care for NFS.
That's why I suggested this.
Thanks,
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companie
eract with vpopmail.
Consider this email in the spirit of an RFC (Request for Comments).
I'm just thinking aloud, but I would genuinely like to here everyone's opinions on the
subject. Especially those of inter7
developers.
Thanks for reading!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrat
take to code everything.)
I'm just thinking aloud here, but I'd like to hear everyone's ideas on the matter.
Thanks,
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet
On Friday 21 February 2003 16:04, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > Maybe this would be a good time to ask this question (I've
> > asked it once before, but never got an answer):
> >
&
l-user info:
> |preline /usr/bin/spamc -f -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> /home/vpopmail/domains/xxx.com/prova/Maildir/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Remo
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-51
e back porting involved? Or does inter7 one day say,
"hey, I think we should release a new production release!"
Info greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jesse
>
> ChangeLog:
> http://shupp.org/patches/vpopmail-ChangeLog
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill Shupp
--
Jesse Guardiani, Syste
Thanks for the error checking to vpopbull!
I haven't tested it yet, but my sanity greatly appreciates it!
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively loo
g people directly when I
> know that they're subscribed to the list -- if they're not responding, it's
> because they're either too busy or disinterested at the time. Either way
> though, it'd be nice to have some kind of indication of the level of
> maintainer intere
't created properly.
> >
> > > I've tried rerunning the `make install` and `make install-strip` with
> > > all my
> >
> >passwords aligned and db access verified, but no soup.
> >
> > > I can't find a schema dump for the vpopmail tab
ay in the next few days. Adding domains/users and authenticating
> definately is working though, and the tables seem to be updating correctly
> for relay and lastauth.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleve
performs as your outgoing MTA. There's a section
about this on the inter7 website here:
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/postfix.txt
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingne
email users per domain using the same
> balenced tree structure.
> [...]
And this is obviously just the software limits. Actual real world limits
depend on your machine, your auth method, etc... LDAP is slower than MySQL,
for example.
It's hard to gather solid data about stuff like t
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:17, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 02:58 PM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > Greetings list,
> >
> > I noticed that the vpopbull program (current production release
> > version)
> > doesn't toss an error if you
grep libmysqlclient" to see if it's listed. Then try
> vadddomain again.
One final note:
I'm not sure if this is the case with Linux, but with FreeBSD one must add
the -m flag in order to keep ldconfig from ditching the previously loaded
path statements.
Check:
man ldconfig
d it stop working?
>
> Best Regards,
> Jasmine
>
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long
Greetings list,
I noticed that the vpopbull program (current production release version)
doesn't toss an error if you give it bad parameters. Is this fixed in the
vpopmail development version?
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Clevelan
it slipped my mind!
>
> I suppose the next question would be has anybody got sqwebmail and/or
> courier-imap to work on hp-ux - one for another list!!
>
> Thanks everybody!
>
> Howard
>
> On Monday 10 February 2003 14:54, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > On Monday 10 F
them, and I would much rather keep it this way.
>
> mutt configuration is a bit daunting - I wondered if anybody has got
> something like this working - or have I just gone crazy?
>
> Thanks
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Clevela
nless they can't
live without the new features. (unless there is a back-porting that goes
into new production releases)
Is that how it works around here? Just a little confused.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
42
rier-imap.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long
distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by
ead the man page for 'ldconfig'.
You'll want to run it with -m, otherwise you'll throw away all of your other
shared object paths when you load a new one.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK
nge sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
released a patch that everyone just can't do without though.
That says a lot for qmail's original design, which I like.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleve
now C, and I occasionally have time to spare, but I don't know qmail, so
it would take a long time to work out. Frankly, I think you're the most
qualified person to undertake a job like that, Ken, since you wrote vpopmail.
And secondly, I don't like patches.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Sy
I get the feeling I'm being ignored.
On Friday 31 January 2003 15:33, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Seriously. This is a good feature! We need to at least mention
> it!
>
> On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:36, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > Howdy list,
> >
> > Upon browsin
Something must have changed. Permissions, .qmail files, etc...
Can't really tell you now that you've recreated the domain and it's working
again.
It's the general "Hey, I can't deliver to that mailbox" error.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingN
Have you tried VQadmin? It's designed for tech support peeps. It has
configurable permission levels, and I _think_ it'll let multiple users in at
once. Just give everyone a login and pass.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland
Ask on the qmailadmin list. Someone there is bound to have it.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long
Don't know about the Perl PHP module, but sure, I can use the C API.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
We are actively looking for companies that do a l
Seriously. This is a good feature! We need to at least mention
it!
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:36, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Howdy list,
>
> Upon browsing through my vpopmail 5.2.1 code, I noticed that
> there is a variable, VPOPMAIL_DOMAIN, that can be set from
> an Apache b
et.net/pub/MAIL/inter7-related/autorespond-2.0.2-patch/autorespond.patch
The problem is that FreeBSD already has a 'strcasestr' function, and the autoresponder
code is trying to redefine it.
My patch simply comments the autoresponder 'strcasestr' function out.
HTH,
Jess
ding *does* work. Are you getting error messages? Does the mail
remain in the postmaster account?
Check for errors in your log. That should always be the first you do when
something doesn't work the way you expect. That's what they're there for.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Admini
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
