dmarc-discuss

Messages by Date

2013/05/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
2013/05/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Michael Adkins
2013/05/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Franck Martin
2013/05/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
2013/05/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
2013/05/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
2013/05/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John R Levine
2013/05/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
2013/05/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
2013/05/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Roland Turner
2013/05/23 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? John Levine
2013/05/23 [dmarc-discuss] Message-ID validation for an auth mechanism: a dumb idea? Matt Simerson
2013/05/13 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Todd Lyons
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Roland Turner
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John R Levine
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
2013/05/12 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Andreas Schulze
2013/05/11 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability John Levine
2013/05/11 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports: zip -vs- gzip, and interoperability Matt Simerson
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Roman Prokhorov
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation John Levine
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Franck Martin
2013/05/07 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Matt Simerson
2013/05/07 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC implementation Roman Prokhorov
2013/05/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? John Levine
2013/05/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? pandalove
2013/04/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/30 [dmarc-discuss] "Using DMARC" draft revision posted. Dave Crocker
2013/04/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
2013/04/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Olga Gavrylyako
2013/04/30 [dmarc-discuss] In memory of JD Matt Simerson
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Does ruf allow mail snooping? Was: Google doesn't support ruf= Patrick Peterson
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Adam Dawes
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Scott Kitterman
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John R Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Steve Atkins
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John R Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Steven M Jones
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Matt Simerson
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Franck Martin
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= J. Trent Adams
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Scott Kitterman
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John R Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Terry Zink
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf bcx+dmarc
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Terry Zink
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Tim Draegen
2013/04/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Tim Draegen
2013/04/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
2013/04/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Scott Kitterman
2013/04/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf John Levine
2013/04/28 [dmarc-discuss] microsoft.com invalid spf Benny Pedersen
2013/04/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
2013/04/28 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= Matt Simerson
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Levine
2013/04/27 [dmarc-discuss] Google doesn't support ruf= John Sweet
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Davide Migliavacca
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Franck Martin
2013/04/27 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
2013/04/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation John Levine
2013/04/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
2013/04/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Douglas Otis
2013/04/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation John Levine
2013/04/26 Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/25 [dmarc-discuss] dmarc implementation Matt Simerson
2013/04/18 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Using DMARC to probe corporate compliance Roland Turner
2013/04/10 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Include DMARC? Franck Martin
2013/04/10 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Include DMARC? Egypt Pilot
2013/04/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/09 Re: [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Franck Martin
2013/04/09 [dmarc-discuss] External Destinations: Wildcards Stephen Nightingale
2013/04/08 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Specification Update Franck Martin
2013/04/08 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC Specification Update J. Trent Adams
2013/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Benny Pedersen
2013/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Benny Pedersen
2013/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Benny Pedersen
2013/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support Douglas Otis
2013/04/06 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support J. Gomez
2013/04/05 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC extended with modified ATPS where DMARC signals ATPS support Douglas Otis
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC plugin for mailfront and qmail Franck Martin
2013/04/05 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC plugin for mailfront and qmail John Levine
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Douglas Otis
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Steve Atkins
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Douglas Otis
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Sweet
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Steve Atkins
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Levine
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Elizabeth Zwicky
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Christine Borgia
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Al Iverson
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Michiel van de Vis
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/05 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Benny Pedersen
2013/04/04 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Olga Gavrylyako
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header John Levine
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Scott Kitterman
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Scott Kitterman
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Mike Jones
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Franck Martin
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Murray Kucherawy
2013/04/03 [dmarc-discuss] Gmail Authentication-Results header Andy Wilson
2013/04/03 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Benny Pedersen
2013/04/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
2013/04/02 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Tom Hendrikx
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Murray S. Kucherawy
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Scott Kitterman
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Michael Adkins
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Steve Atkins
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Alan Maitland
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Michael Adkins
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Michael Adkins
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Andreas Schulze
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Scott Kitterman
2013/04/01 Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Franck Martin
2013/04/01 [dmarc-discuss] opendmarc, spf, dkim and milters Franck Martin
2013/03/31 [dmarc-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal Murray S. Kucherawy
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John Levine
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Steve Atkins
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Dave Crocker
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Scott Kitterman
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] soft fail, was avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John Levine
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Tom Hendrikx
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Franck Martin
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Scott Kitterman
2013/03/31 [dmarc-discuss] DMRC with Zimbra Blason rock
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Scott Kitterman
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/03/31 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? J. Gomez
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Murray Kucherawy
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Alan Maitland
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John R Levine
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Dave Crocker
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? John Levine
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Rolf E. Sonneveld
2013/03/30 [dmarc-discuss] suggestions ? Andreas Schulze
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard J. Gomez
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John R Levine
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard Mason Schmitt
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] avoiding collateral damage, was Will DMARC make it hard John Levine
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Franck Martin
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Rolf E. Sonneveld
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists J. Gomez
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Rolf E. Sonneveld
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Steven M Jones
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists J. Gomez
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
2013/03/30 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Franck Martin
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Steve Atkins
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists John R Levine
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists Franck Martin
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC breaks mailing lists John Levine
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Tim Draegen
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? Dave Crocker
2013/03/29 Re: [dmarc-discuss] Will DMARC make it hard for outsourced marketing mail operations? J. Gomez