From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:11 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 25 July 2014 12:48, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list
I agree to an extent, but this sort of argument tends to drift towards
tautology. Whatever survives survives, and hence has survival value in some
sense. But a meme that turns someone into a suicide bomber or celibate monk
probably doesn't have much survival value for that person. My feeling is
.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014
Memes cannot survive without a human brain. We are their vehicle, but
are the our effluent, or our children?
-Original Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Jul 25, 2014 3:47 am
Subject: Re: Atheist
I agree to an extent
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 12:48 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
I agree to an extent, but this sort of argument tends to drift towards
tautology. Whatever
.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014
On 25 July 2014 10:21, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Cultural determism is incompatible with natural selection.
Pardon my ignorance, but what is cultural determinism? (Or what would it
be, if there was such a thing?)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Oh, OK, WIkipedia! (oops!)
*Cultural determinism* is the belief that the culture in which we are
raised determines who we are at emotional and behavioral levels. This
supports the theory that environmental influences dominate who we are
instead of biologically inherited traits.
That sounds a bit
12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
And too much diversity syrup makes me vomit
Seems you choose to do much of your vomiting on this list; is there some reason
you feel so compelled to share your vomit?
--
You received this message because you
And in any case 'natural selection' would just be replaced by 'cultural selection' - which
is natural.
Brent
On 7/24/2014 3:42 PM, LizR wrote:
Oh, OK, WIkipedia! (oops!)
*Cultural determinism*is the belief that the culture in which we are raised determines
who we are at emotional and
On 25 July 2014 11:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
And in any case 'natural selection' would just be replaced by 'cultural
selection' - which is natural.
What is 'cultural selection' ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 25 July 2014 11:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
And in any case 'natural selection' would just be replaced
On 25 July 2014 12:48, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
--
*From:* LizR lizj...@gmail.com
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:49 PM
*Subject:* Re: Atheist
On 25 July 2014 11
On 7/24/2014 4:49 PM, LizR wrote:
On 25 July 2014 11:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
And in any case 'natural selection' would just be replaced by 'cultural
selection' -
which is natural.
What is 'cultural selection' ?
I think there are two
On 25 July 2014 13:32, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/24/2014 4:49 PM, LizR wrote:
On 25 July 2014 11:27, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
And in any case 'natural selection' would just be replaced by 'cultural
selection' - which is natural.
What is 'cultural
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 10:47 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 7/19/2014 10:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From
On 19 Jul 2014, at 22:08, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
Well sure... life is more pleasant when people have a live and let
live attitude. As you point out respect needs mutuality. Respecting
an institution that does not respect anyone that does not adopt
their dogma is
On 20 Jul 2014, at 02:21, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing the (rather common) God
hallucination, there are technic for that (fasting, sleep
deprivation, magic mushrooms, LSD, salvia, near death experiences,
etc.).
On 20 Jul 2014, at 03:00, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:21 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing the (rather common) God
hallucination, there are technic for that
On 20 Jul 2014, at 05:26, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
wrote:
I would describe it as a societal paradigm... this unspoken rule
that all should respect religion.
Yes, but why does religion and only
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Jul 2014, at 03:00, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:21 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing
On 20 Jul 2014, at 16:32, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 20 Jul 2014, at 03:00, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:21 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM,
as minds in the multiverse,
therefore
everithing is theoretically possible even under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re
. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G
everithing is theoretically possible even under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:08 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 17 Jul 2014, at 20:24, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing the (rather common) God hallucination,
there are technic for that (fasting, sleep deprivation, magic mushrooms, LSD, salvia,
near death experiences, etc.).
Really? That will allow me to see the unprovable
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:21 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing the (rather common) God
hallucination, there are technic for that (fasting, sleep deprivation,
magic mushrooms, LSD, salvia, near death
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I would describe it as a societal paradigm… this unspoken rule that all
should respect religion.
Yes, but why does religion and only religion get this special treatment?
Nobody thinks that
On 20 Jul 2014, at 10:21 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, if you are interested in experiencing the (rather common) God
hallucination, there are technic for that (fasting, sleep deprivation,
magic mushrooms, LSD, salvia, near
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:27 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list
On 7/19/2014 10:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
*From:*everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *John Clark
*Sent:* Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:27 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Atheist
On Thu, Jul
On 17 Jul 2014, at 18:02, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything?
they
under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 17 Jul 2014, at 20:24, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:25 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 17 Jul
: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything
this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything
...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything?
they
are no longer materialistic. Either they are no-theories or they allow
any interpretation anyone may like about the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:20 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
Salman Rushdie wrote:
religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion
everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 4:33 am
Subject: RE: Atheist
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:20 AM
To: everything
On 16 Jul 2014, at 19:31, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-16 19:22 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-15 22:10 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 17:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14
2014-07-17 17:04 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 19:31, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-16 19:22 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-15 22:10 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
This illustrated video might be of interest:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151781219163852
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-07-17 17:04 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 19:31, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything?
they
are no longer materialistic. Either they are
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:00, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing.
Which one? What do you mean by absolutely everything?
they
are no longer materialistic. Either
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:33, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:20 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
Salman
under this monistic
hypothesis. Everithing goes.
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 17, 2014 12:02 pm
Subject: Re: Atheist
2014-07-17 10:31 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal marc
On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:09, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-17 17:04 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 19:31, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-16 19:22 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-15
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:25 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Atheist
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:33, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote
Dear John,
Thank you for sharing your amazing life story!
You ask: 'Allow me please one more question: how is it balanced with the
Day of the Divine Final Sentencing that people die now and some go to
Heaven and some to Hell? (I am referring to the 72 virgins vs. the
fire-created Satan-helpers
PGC,
I do not assume that you don't read religious text. I do get the feeling
though that you do not hold them in esteem, due to the reasons you cite
against them, particularly the blasphemy point you keep raising. Also, I do
not think the Quran is yet on your reading list. Is that correct?
If
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:05, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/15/2014 12:27 PM, John Clark wrote:
Yes, the Bible contains its own sadistic lunacy--but the above
quotations can be fairly said to convey the central message of the
Qur'an--and of Islam at nearly every moment in its history. The
Qur'an does
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-15 22:10 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 17:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14
2014-07-16 19:22 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:14, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-15 22:10 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 17:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:17, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
Well I can accept such language in mathematics where you make clear
what is meant, not in every day use when someone says he
*believes* in god, that's not what he
Salman Rushdie wrote:
religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion intervenes, mere
innocence is no excuse. Yet we go on skating around this issue, speaking of
religion in the fashionable language of respect. What is there to respect
in any of this, or in any of the crimes now being
Samiya, I can be no more appreciative to all I learned from you about the
Islamic issues during my entire life. I will not change my ways of thinking
now, after 92 years, but I still like to learn.
So live well, have a good life (wherever it will take you) - you got a
friend in me. So please do
The latest theories of everithing admit absolutely everithing. they
are no longer materialistic. Either they are no-theories or they allow
any interpretation anyone may like about the know and unknow reality.
In certain sense materialism has given up without being conscious of
it. That is because
As someone said...
Man created God in his own image: Intolerant, sexist, homophobic, and
violent.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/female-scientists-quit-2014071588582
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Poor you.
It must be very hard to live with such insane hate against men.
It must hurt you a lot. You need help.
2014-07-15 13:05 GMT+02:00, LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/female-scientists-quit-2014071588582
--
You received this message because you are
May I suggest you try water instead of corona ? Or maybe coconut water ? it
may help you to climb faster...
2014-07-15 13:44 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
Poor you.
It must be very hard to live with such insane hate against men.
It must hurt you a lot. You need help.
That is atheistic humor?
Perhaps too much atheism can endanger the cognitive hability for
creating good jokes. I don´t know. Or it may be the consequences of
too much exposition to this particular atheists affirmation group.
Some controlled experiments are necessary.
2014-07-15 13:49
2014-07-15 14:06 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
That is atheistic humor?
Not at all it is humor for stupid... Maybe I should try humor for fascist
homophobic mysoginistic christian asshole ? It would certainly be better
suited for the kind of marvelous coconut climber your
This new joke is even worse
Try burning something.
You are sick of hate, and you also are badly in need of help.
2014-07-15 14:24 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
2014-07-15 14:06 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
That is atheistic humor?
Not at all it is
2014-07-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
This new joke is even worse
Try burning something.
Hmm good idea, are you free for dinner ?
You are sick of hate, and you also are badly in need of help.
2014-07-15 14:24 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
That is better. Congrats!
2014-07-15 14:50 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
2014-07-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
This new joke is even worse
Try burning something.
Hmm good idea, are you free for dinner ?
You are sick of hate, and you also
You are sick of hate, and you also are badly in need of help.
I see Alberto is in a helping mood this morning. Such a pious man. Bravo
Alberto!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 14 Jul 2014, at 18:06, Samiya Illias wrote:
On 14-Jul-2014, at 11:08 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:09, Samiya Illias wrote:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Good point, especially coming from a literalist :)
:)
I agree that God,
To tell the truth is the most friendly and helpful. Truth make you
free. first the truth, then, love.
If you have friends that don´t tell you the naked and painful truth
then they are not real friends. They lie you to make you useful for
them, to enslave you. Truth in the other side, empowers you
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
wrote:
most people choose the religion of their parents, as part of culture and
are comfortable confirming to social norms, instead of honest intellectual
inquiry and search.
Yes, all the people in the middle east didn't
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Atheist
To tell the truth is the most friendly and helpful. Truth make you
free. first the truth, then, love.
If you have
On 15-Jul-2014, at 12:57 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com
wrote:
most people choose the religion of their parents, as part of culture and
are comfortable confirming to social norms, instead of honest
The following is from the Sam Harris book The End Of Faith.
Open the Koran, which is perfect in its every syllable, and simply read it
with the eyes of faith. You will see how little compassion need be wasted
on those whom God himself is in the process of “mocking,” “cursing,”
“shaming,”
On 7/15/2014 12:27 PM, John Clark wrote:
Yes, the Bible contains its own sadistic lunacy—but the above quotations can be fairly
said to convey the central message of the Qur’an—and of Islam at nearly every moment in
its history. The Qur’an does not contain anything like a Sermon on the Mount.
On 14 Jul 2014, at 17:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Why should you
2014-07-15 22:10 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 17:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
From: Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
Well I can accept such language in mathematics where you make clear what is
meant, not in every day use when someone says he *believes* in god, that's
not what he meant... That's what I don't like in your
I like men. Well, most men. (There are bad apples in every barrel...)
On 15 July 2014 23:44, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Poor you.
It must be very hard to live with such insane hate against men.
It must hurt you a lot. You need help.
2014-07-15 13:05 GMT+02:00, LizR
On 14 Jul 2014, at 19:59, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/14/2014 7:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Jul 2014, at 15:09, David Nyman wrote:
On 12 July 2014 20:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Of course they wouldn't because 17 is a prime number is a
tautology. It's
true simply in virtue
Dear Samiya, thanks unlimitedly for your kind and information-laden
response that opens eyes (mine included). I fell into political turmoil at
an early age (WWII) and struggled to learn how to make a living in
science/technology. I learned Latin and Gothic alphabets at 4-5 (on my
own), Cyrillic
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
On 14-Jul-2014, at 2:14 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/13/2014 3:47 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Sure: Do you believe in a theist god?
I'd like to.
So we can keep using the word theology and keep some academic
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Why should you believe if you can know ? If you can't, why should you
believe instead of not believing or go eating an hamburger ?
Quentin
On 14-Jul-2014, at 2:14 am, meekerdb
Obviously you never seen Justin Beiber performing live.
I can point to art, people with genders, and french literature. I've run
a political campaign. But I've never seen a god.
Brent
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To:
On 13 Jul 2014, at 15:09, David Nyman wrote:
On 12 July 2014 20:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Of course they wouldn't because 17 is a prime number is a
tautology. It's
true simply in virtue of it's meaning like x is x. But is it a
fact about
the world or just a fact about
On 14 Jul 2014, at 08:14, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/13/2014 3:47 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Sure: Do you believe in a theist god?
I'd like to.
So we can keep using the word theology and keep some academic
departments that have no subject.
This would also include political
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:09, Samiya Illias wrote:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Good point, especially coming from a literalist :)
I agree that God, actually like a Universe, is not seeable. To see a
universe, you would need to send photons, or some thing, to it, and
see
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Why should you believe if you can know ? If you can't, why should
you believe instead of not believing or go eating an hamburger
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Why should you believe if you can know ? If you can't, why should
On 14-Jul-2014, at 11:25 am, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
Why do you need to see God
2014-07-14 17:50 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
On 14-Jul-2014, at 11:25 am, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:53, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-14 12:09 GMT+02:00 Samiya
On 14-Jul-2014, at 11:08 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Jul 2014, at 12:09, Samiya Illias wrote:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
Good point, especially coming from a literalist :)
:)
I agree that God, actually like a Universe, is not seeable.
On 7/14/2014 7:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Jul 2014, at 15:09, David Nyman wrote:
On 12 July 2014 20:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Of course they wouldn't because 17 is a prime number is a tautology. It's
true simply in virtue of it's meaning like x is x. But is it a fact
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
You don't. To believe in God all that is needed in 99 times out of 100 is
for your mommy and daddy to tell you that there is a God. Not only that but
your mommy and daddy will tell
On 14-Jul-2014, at 2:00 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you need to see God to believe in God?
You don't. To believe in God all that is needed in 99 times out of 100 is for
your mommy and daddy to
On 14-Jul-2014, at 12:00 pm, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-14 17:50 GMT+02:00 Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com:
On 14-Jul-2014, at 11:25 am, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-14 17:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
On
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
