[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE:CREATE project

2005-09-18 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
Hi, I'm representing CREATE project [1] Creative Free and Open Source projects such as Blender, GIMP, Inkscape, Scribus, Audacity, Open Clip Art Library and others are highly successful projects which produce much video, audio, illustrations, photos, and other content. However, much code, media,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp Website

2005-09-24 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/24/05, Preacher Public <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What else? First I'd like to see this website used as a hub for the Gimp > community. I'd like to add real resources like scripts, brushes, gradients, > and patterns (as opposed to images of GIMP resources that already come with > the app, a

Re: [Gimp-developer] 16bit channels, doh

2005-11-01 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/1/05, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much of the GIMP development over the last few years have been about > modularizing and gobjectifying the code this has lead to a separation > that will make a merge with GEGL easier in the future. At the moment I > think the GIMP code base is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: 16bit channels, doh

2005-11-01 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/1/05, Roel Schroeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.gegl.org/TODO.html seems to be something like that. Yes, except it was updated on 12 February, 2003 :) I'm not saying that somebody is obligated to do it, because as contributor I understand how difficult it can be to find even 5

Re: [Gimp-developer] lense distortion plugin

2005-12-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/20/05, Campbell Barton wrote: > Hi, have been using daves lense distortion plugin. it realy usefull for > making tiled textures and seems a good plugin to include for any app > that works with photos. > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~hodsond/gimp.html > It compiles with Gimp CVS also. [EMA

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp 2.3.6

2005-12-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/20/05, Tim Jedlicka wrote: > http://developer.gimp.org/NEWS references gimp 2.3.6, but I can't find the > snapshot on the mirrors. Is this just what to expect in 2.3.6 once it > becomes available? Yes Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] lense distortion plugin

2005-12-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/20/05, David Hodson wrote: > I haven't seen those before - what version of gcc are you running? 4.0.1 > In any case, they're just warnings, so it should still compile and > install. It doesn't. Could we possibly move this discussion to some other mailing list? As for your original mail,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: color balance (preserve luminosity) bug

2005-12-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/21/05, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote: > example images of too much cleaveage for a mailing list kthx. there are > women on this list too This is just photogtaphy, not even nu. Nothing "too much", really Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: color balance (preserve luminosity) bug

2005-12-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/22/05, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote: > >This is just photogtaphy, not even nu. Nothing "too much", really > > That does not mean that it is pleasant to have to look at. > > If you want to get your kicks out of pornography, kindly keep it to your > bedroom. Consider the other participants on t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patterns

2005-12-28 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/28/05, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > So - developers, what do you think might be the best approach? To > update the patterns that come with the program thenselves or make > additional collections available? First of all, man http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/index.php/About and http

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patterns

2005-12-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/28/05, Carol Spears wrote: > you know what? i love pixel art. the soft edges and the blotchy > reality of real life. sure, i am glad that gimp can stroke paths nicely > now. but what about the pixel? vector art will make such clean edges > on everyones computer that the real world will

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gegl-developer] Gegl web site

2006-01-08 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/5/06, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:17, Todd Relyea wrote: > > Is someone responsible for keeping the gegl web site > > up to date? I've noticed some out of date and broken > > links on the main page. > > > If not, I'd be more than willing to lend a hand... > > Seconded.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gegl-developer] Gegl web site

2006-01-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/9/06, Michael Schumacher wrote: > "Where is the doc now?" implies that something that was available before > the change isn't anymore. In this case it is interesting to know what > exactly is gone. API documentation. Btw, it would be great to have a nightly updated (using cron, of course) AP

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gegl-developer] Gegl web site

2006-01-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/10/06, Michael Schumacher wrote: > IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet. Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :) Anyway, you can count on me, when it comes to changes at gegl.org Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing lis

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gegl-developer] Gegl web site

2006-01-11 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/11/06, Sven Neumann wrote: > > On 1/10/06, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > > >> IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet. > > > > Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :) > > Yes, I did. If you want to argue about it, feel free to do that. > But it feels somewhat strange

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Re: [Gegl-developer] Gegl web site

2006-01-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/17/06, Florent Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> IMO Sven has explained why this isn't a good idea yet. > > > > Well, I don't think he explained exactly *that* :) > > Indeed he explained that the doc was removed because it was > really too old and outdated, and that it was not sync to th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring Back the Keyboard!

2006-02-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/10/06, Scott wrote: > I don't know where else to vent other than this list, so forgive if > inappropriate. This is gtk-related, not GIMP related, actually. It was discussed here at least one time, which resulted in a flame war of a universe scale :) Please use Ctrl+L in Open/Save dialog to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring Back the Keyboard!

2006-02-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/15/06, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >All of which sounds like _much_ more work (and many more design >decisions) than simply making the file selector work consistently. > > Not to mention that someone might want to edit files in a hidden > directory for other reasons (e. g. thumbnail files

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Bart wrote: > > 8bi files working on Mac and Win only (as far as i know). *cough* http://tml-blog.blogspot.com/2006/02/photoshop-filters-in-gimp-on-linux.html *cough* Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkele

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Simon Budig wrote: > There were plans to work on a next-generation XCF resolving these > issues. I too see the need for a widely accepted exchange format for > multilayered images with a lot of additional information, but the > current XCF format does not meet the "good enough" criteria

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thursday, March 2, 2006, 15:54:12, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > > Or do you imagine an XML with > > binary data inside? > > Isn't XML limited to text only? IIRC, it's not. At least when you save an SVG from Adobe Ill

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Frédéric wrote: > > Isn't XML limited to text only? > > What about the solution like OpenDocument one, where the files are in fact > archives, with several files inside? Sure, I like this approach Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I tried to mail the gimp developers list, but I guess my mail is being held up > somewhere. I wanted to propose cooperating on getting an OASIS OpenDocument > spec done for layered raster images. Is there some proposal already? Alexandre __

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > No, I wanted to start on it after I get Krita 1.5 out of the door -- and I > didn't want to do this alone. There's no sense in starting an OpenDocument > standard without buy-in from the major free raster image application. There has been a discussion on export

Re: Image exchange format [was Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec]

2006-03-02 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/2/06, Alan Horkan wrote: > Rather than mentioning a future possible ideal format I'd like to mention > MNG, which although far from perfect for all graphics tasks (print > graphics). This is less than ideal but still a small improvement over PNG > because at least you get to keep your layers

Re: [Inkscape-devel] Re: OpenDocument. Was: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-03 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/3/06, Cyrille Berger wrote: > I am starting to be lost in this thread spread over at least four mailing > lists :) May I suggest the opening of a mailing list dedicaced to the talk > about an OpenDocument for raster files ? Maybe on freedesktop as it is the > most neutral organisation ;) But I

[Gimp-developer] Re: [CREATE] Open File Format for Raster/Bitmaps Graphics

2006-03-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/21/06, Cyrille Berger wrote: > Firstly, I invite developers of The Gimp, Cinepaint, Krita and any other > projects interested in talking about an Open File Format for Raster/Bitmaps > Graphics to join the create mailing list at freedesktop.org (more information > at http://lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/21/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > >GIMP does not attempt to be Photoshop nor to be like Photoshop. > > Well, I think it should! If there is any software today that has potential > to be a PS counterpart, it is GIMP. I mean why, would we not want it to be > Photoshop? It's so simple that I fai

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/21/06, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > are doomed to fail if you try to make a great tool by carbon copying > it. By carbon copying other tool, sorry :))) Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/21/06, Sven Neumann wrote: > >Well, in this particular case, I would just encourage to rename > >'Xtns' to 'Extensions'. > > The problem here is that the toolbox is rather small and if we renamed > the menu as you suggested, that would push the Help menu off the > window. Of course yo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/22/06, Axel Wernicke wrote: > > Simply distributing menu items sounds like a fairly easy task. > Doing so would assume that there is always at least one document > window. This is not the case in the gui architecture of GIMP right now. Exactly. So, do you have some Inkscape-like GUI on your

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-22 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/23/06, Brendan wrote: > Oh god, that is lame. > > "We want to write good, quality code, that 4 people will use. We could make a > few concessions and get 4 million using it, but no, we're good with the 4 > people." > > Please, oh Lord, someone fork Gimp. I'm doing my best to understand why p

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/23/06, Brendan wrote: > I am primarily a KDE hacker. I already donate piles of time to that effort, > including writing docs. I use Gimp almost every day, but I hear it > continuously about the need to have it at least have a PS compatibility mode, > from graphic designers who would love to u

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/23/06, Alex Fernandez wrote: > > Why do you keep using GIMP? Why don't you help Boudewijn with tracking > > down bugs in Krita 1.5 beta2? > > Great way to attract collaborators. I guess many people love the GIMP, > but they don't have the attitude to cooperate in its development; I > could not

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/23/06, Sven Neumann wrote: > > And when it's done will toolbox still be an always floating window > > or optionally dockable one? > > We will have to evaluate this based on user scenarios. ButI don't > think we would reject a clean patch that adds this functionality. Sure :) > > Simply dist

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/23/06, Alex Fernandez wrote: > But he doesn't! He said that the GIMP could have a PS compatibility > mode For usability's sake it's not good to introduce modes that make same application look and behave different. It was countless times announced by developers in this and other mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] ./configure not finding glib?

2006-03-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/24/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > The first step for me to be able to contribute to GIMP is making it build. > > I have downloaded and compiled several libraries, but I am having problem > with glib. > > I downloaded the 2.10.1 glib tarball from gnome servers, and ran > ./configure, make, make

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote: > Hello all > This debate about the Xtns etc. has been going on for tooo long.. > Can there be a simple solution? > > How about move (Xtns) to (File-> Extensions) > > The file menu isnt that full at the moment, and it seems a logical place > for it. Huh? Logical?

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote: > Hah. your right. its not exactly logical. but its a tradeoff > File->Extensions (uses a word people can understand) > Xtns (Is in a place people see) > > if you want to be picky- "Preferences" is not a file operation either. > But there is no "Edit", "Option

Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal

2006-03-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Howdy! > > Here's what I have for the dialog wilbers (down the bottom): > > http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=Tango-GIMP The lowest row made me crowl under table from laughter :) But, honestly, the idea of using different colors to distinguish one action from

Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal

2006-03-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Which icons are you refering to? Ouch, that were color channel. My apologize :( They really look like layers. That confused me. Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU htt

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface user for the GIMP

2006-03-31 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/1/06, Roland Wild wrote: > I would like you to give me your opinion on this: > http://linuxmedia.tuxfamily.org/contrib/gimp/index.html I'm sorry, but this is example of inefficient usage of GIMP. You can save a lot of screen space be regrouping palettes actually: http://prokoudine.info/sho

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface for the GIMP

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/1/06, Roland Wild wrote: > Alexandre, > In your example you don't have all the funcfionnality offer by the program > (see > http://docs.gimp.org/en/concepts-beginners.html#gimp-concepts-usage > ). I actually referred to the first screenshot, on which GIMP has cluttered (to my POV) layout. W

Re: [Gimp-developer] Comments on gimp's interface

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/3/06, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > > #5 How do i pan with a graphical tablet ? (no RMB/MMB ?) > > If you don't waste one of the buttons for double-click, you > can have them all. Double-clicking with the pen only needs a little > getting used to it, but after a short while it feels natural and is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Comments on gimp's interface

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/3/06, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > With GIMP and Inkscape, panning is on MMB. > > There's the option to put double-left-click on one of the buttons. > If you do that, you can't have both MMB and RMB also available. > If you don't, all is fine with panning. So it this considered GIMP's fault or tab

Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

2006-04-03 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/1/06, Richard Reddy wrote: a lot of text snipped > As director of photography for North American Women's Baseball League > (NAWBL), I know that searching and sorting images can be very > time-consuming work. Using Gimp you could automatically transfer image > metadata to tags. It would be

Re: Project proposal: Resource contribution, distribution and management system (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] Google Summer of Code 2006, to whom it may concern)

2006-04-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/17/06, Michael Schumacher wrote: > The initial idea: > > Provide a system that allows anyone to contribute and maintain resources > (brushes, palettes, scripts, plug-ins, ...) for GIMP, and have it > organized in a way that makes it easy for GIMP users to access these > resources. I wonder i

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 4/18/06, Dave Neary wrote: > I had some ideas: > - Scripting languages and the GIMP - work on ruby or python bindings > - Plug-ins: Save for web for example (too small to be a project, but > could be part of one) > - Effect layers - I think this is fairly straightforward with the GIMP > as i

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Color Paletes for Gimp, Inkscape and Krita (also Scribus compatible one)

2006-05-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/11/06, jEsuSdA 8) wrote: But my idea is unificate all palettes What exactly does it mean? Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Color Paletes for Gimp, Inkscape and Krita (also Scribus compatible one)

2006-05-11 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/11/06, jEsuSdA 8) wrote: it means create a palette independent package. By the moment, i've created a simple script to create a folder (/usr/share/color-palettes) and link it into gimp, krita an inkscape palettes directory. What you are trying to do is exactly what we are doing in CREATE.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer' commanddefaultto 'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: Which part of "improve workflow" in my e-mail was hard to understand? I mean you can't possibly mean that it is more effective to Shift-Click than to only Click? Do you have showable results of a usability study that clearly states that GIMP should always cr

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer' commanddefaultto 'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: Having to use two hands instead of one is a dramatic loss of workflow IMHO. What is the second hand doing then, if not being on keyboard? I'm really curious, because when I'm using GIMP/Inkscape/Scribus, my left hand is _always_ on keyboard, mostly in the C

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: (? my reply seems to have been lost, I will reply again) Well no, I have no statistics :) As I said though, we could gather some if needed. Maybe some admid could ask on the Users list if they find it appropriate. Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: I think like this: For maximum workflow, one should be able to do as many things simultaneously as possible, wouldn't you agree with that? What else can I do while creating a new layer except scratching my poor head and holding a paper? :) Again, I would lik

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer'commanddefaultto'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: With my suggestion: One click and press 'L' or Ctrl + Shift + 'N', 'L' (Which btw makes the right hand free to do whatever it wants) It doesn't free the right hand :) I understand your point. Our different conclusions is based upon our different definition

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'Newlayer'commanddefaultto'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: >>I understand your point. Our different conclusions is based upon our >>different definitions of 'consistency'. I think that the UI should be >>consistend in the effective workflow sense, while you want it to be >>consistent in a structured way. > >I don't bu

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.3.9 Development Release

2006-06-06 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/6/06, Sven Neumann wrote: Over the next weeks, we will try to add the remaining missing features and to iron out all the bugs that are blocking the 2.4 release. Any help with that is very much appreciated. Is the plan to have SoC code in 2.4? Alexandre __

Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal

2006-06-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 6/15/06, Jakub Steiner wrote: Thanks for the constructive feedback Akkana. It indeed is one of the few icons with solid background. I tried to convey the fg/bg separation message better this time around. Does that work for you? http://jimmac.musichall.cz/wipicons/Tango-GIMP//stock-tool-foreg

[Gimp-developer] PSD load/save

2006-06-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
Hi, Does anyone own a list of supported and not supported by GIMP features of PSD? Googling hasn't helped me much, but at least it gave these two useful sources: http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/msg09223.html http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkel

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: It's getting worse... Now I really wantthe old rect selection tool back!

2006-07-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 7/27/06, William Skaggs wrote: I think that if there is already an existing rectangle in an image, then you can still do what you did previously: enter a number for the width, a number for the height, and click the "fix aspect" checkbox. This will not work if there is no already-existing rec

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: It's getting worse... Now I really wanttheold rect selection tool back!

2006-07-27 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 7/27/06, William Skaggs wrote: I would have to understand the need better before I could write code for it. Is there a specific set of predefined aspect ratios that would suffice? If so, what are they? Or is it essential for the user to be able to add new ratios to the list? Karl was fas

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: SIGGRAPH BOF - failed

2006-08-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 8/7/06, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: One possible answer is to ask what plugin they have used in PhotoShop. They could ask the plugin author to release the GIMP version. Specially if the algorithm has been patented. GIMP 2.3.x already has a red-eye removal plug-in for several months. How come pe

Re: [Gimp-developer] Vector Layers are working, give them a try!

2006-08-17 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 8/14/06, Henk Boom wrote: You can find the source code on the soc-2006-vector-layers branch of the GIMP CVS. To create a vector layer, right click on a path in the paths dialog and select "Path to vector layer". This acts like a regular layer except that it auto-updates to reflect changes in

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-web] http://layers.gimp.org/ is Ugly

2006-08-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 8/29/06, Shlomi Fish wrote: Well, we can use any of the following designs, which are much better: * http://www.planetapache.org/ * http://advogato.ev-en.org/ * http://planet.gnome.org/ * http://planetsun.org/ I recall seeing even better looking planets in my neverending web surfing. Plus

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-09-04 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/4/06, Henning Makholm wrote: > We need a document explaining this which is not hidden in a mailing-list > thread. I'm afraid I am not able to post documents in less hidden places than mailing list threads. Is wiki.gimp.org a less hidden place than mailing threads? :) Alexandre _

Re: [Gimp-developer] soc-2006-healing-brush branch merged and closed

2006-09-04 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/4/06, Kevin Sookocheff wrote: I created a tutorial about the tool. Is there any GIMP hosted site where I could post it to for everyone to look at. This should answer most of your questions. Theres is wiki.gimp.org, but I don't know if it allows uploading images Alexandre __

Re: [Gimp-developer] Hard edged Ink tool?

2006-09-04 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/4/06, Sven Neumann wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:25 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Is wiki.gimp.org a less hidden place than mailing threads? :) Definitely. Putting something up on wiki.gimp.org is pretty much equivalent to writing it on a piece of paper and flushing it down

Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC roundup

2006-09-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/10/06, David Neary wrote: * New/Extended Brush System Philip Lafleur (Sven Neumann) Philip has worked on gegl all Summer, and his contributions are helping make sure that the GIMP 3.0 will be that bit closer, once 2.4 gets out the door. Does it mean that Philip worked on brushes

Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC roundup

2006-09-10 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/10/06, David Neary wrote: A couple of extra questions * Proposal for wavelets-based imaging applications in GIMP Divyanshu Vats (Simon Budig) Divyanshu successfully completed jpeg2000 support, and a number of image filters integrating wavelet transforms. Divyanshu's blog has no

[Gimp-developer] devel docs

2006-09-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
Greetings, As well as I understand, the switch to TinyFu from Script-Fu for 2.4 is quite possible (considering Tiny-Fu is already shipped with GIMP 2.3.x for Windows by default). Is it planned to provide documentation for script-fu developers to help them porting their stuff to 2.4, whether the

Re: [Gimp-developer] requesting a change in the defaults

2006-09-20 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/20/06, Carol Spears wrote: i just checked preferences and the defaults start with that mouse wheel controller to be automatically enabled by default. is this such a common mouse It is. No kidding. Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: requesting a change in the defaults

2006-09-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 9/21/06, Roel Schroeven wrote: OTOH, touchpads and pointing sticks on laptops don't have scroll wheels. Sorry to disappoint you, but here on my ASUS M6N there are two ways to emulate scrolling: 1. Middle touchpad up/down button. 2. Right and bottom borders of the touchpad surface. Carol,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-10-05 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/5/06, Sven Neumann wrote: > In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless > mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if > someone could review the strings that have been marked for translation. > I would like to point translators to the n

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there a reason you don't use tear-off menus? Having small sub-menus > actually enhances this utility. I assume a "tear-off" menu is the context menu I get from a right-mouse click. Which is wrong ;-) http://www.fifi.org/doc/gnumeric-doc/html/C/figur

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/15/06, mobin joseph wrote: please take me out of the mailing list thank you. Since noone took you here, why should someone take you out of here? Bottom line of every email in this list is: https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer Please go there and remove your

Re: [Gimp-developer] Specifically simplifying user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/19/06, Leon Brooks wrote: Hokay, but before we start there, is there a particular outcome which GIMP wants from the discussion? Shaded bar instead of dash-dash? Tool-tips? Something else? Something specific? I agree with Sven, however, having tooltip would be helpful. Alexandre

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/20/06, gg wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > all other toolkits that have tear-off menus 'still interested to know what "all the other toolkits" are. Qt Alexandre ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@l

Re: [Gimp-developer] [BULK]

2006-10-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am the a codeveloper of the gimp-ace2 plugin (http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=5221). I would be very happy if this usefull plugin would be added to GIMP-2.3.x. Please don't it as offence, but last time I investigated ACE (ca. 4 months ago), developers

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: More interface rantings

2006-10-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/27/06, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: Your text gives an impression that the old crop tool is not anymore there. Is that the case? Yes, it is The fact is that people have different ways of working and therefore having two (or more) versions of the tools would be perfectly ok. Can you provid

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: More interface rantings

2006-10-30 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 10/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:01:13 +0100, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, a tool which will remember what I want > it to do will be appreciated as a wise tool. I'll second that, I find it very time consuming having to reassert my jpeg/png options, comp

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-11-06 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/6/06, Øyvind Kolås wrote: Well for brightness/contrast for instance, I think something like the "curves" like UI provided at http://pippin.gimp.org/bauxite/old_screenshots/2004-06-15.png combined with entries would probably be superior to just separate sliders for brightness/contrast. An

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: I would also like to further improve the color management preferences. In this case it seems like a good idea to try to get something that resembles the Photoshop color management configuration in terms of terminology and policies. Sven, I would strongly recom

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: I know about the OpenICC project and I am subscribed to the mailing-list. But I don't think they can provide me with a decent proposal for color management policies and what terms to use. If by "them" you are referring to developers of Scribus, ICC-Examin, LPro

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list I posted earlier. We need to check if the new print plug-in is ready for release. Since I don't use GTK+ 2.10 yet, I didn't get a chance to have a look at it yet. What requirements should

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Question abt compling GIMP

2006-11-28 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/28/06, howard chen wrote: > I just want to modify a plugin file (*c) in the common folder, > currently, when I modified the file, I use `make && make install` to > compile, link and install the GIMP. > > But this take some times to test the feature, are there any better method? Make full com

Re: [Gimp-developer] [Gegl-developer] Question abt compling GIMP

2006-11-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/29/06, Sven Neumann wrote: > But this will take forever. Instead, say your plug-in is called foo.c, > you can use 'make -C plug-ins/common foo' to build and 'make -C > plug-ins/common install-foo' to install the plug-in. Unless you change > the procedure registration, you don't even need to

Re: [Gimp-developer] default setup for 2.4 comments

2006-12-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/7/06, Adrian Likins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. In the toolbox, the fg/bg color, and brush/patter/gradient boxes > should be on. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365226 Sven mentions Colors editor palette there. I would also suggest revisiting it and giving it some UI love. In

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 splash screen

2006-12-18 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 12/13/06, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Howdy folks, > as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen > for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished > and not super-serious at the same time. So, no contest this time? :) Alexandre ___

[Gimp-developer] color management

2007-01-13 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
Hi, Since Sven proposed discussing 2.4 in mailing list and none of my questions/proposals are reflected in the bugzilla, here they are. Before you read any further, please note that I'm not trying to look smarter than you, I'm just initiating discussion ;-) Please prove me wrong where I am wrong.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Color management preferences not working and other CM stuff

2007-01-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/16/07, Sven Neumann wrote: > We plan to have 2.6 out shortly after so I am currently postponing > pretty much everything related to color management to the 2.6 release. Is 2.6 going to be bugfix release or a first stable version using GEGL/babl? Alexandre ___

Re: [Gimp-developer] color management

2007-01-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/13/07, Sven Neumann wrote: > I thought about having it in 2.4 but I think it's probably best > distributed seperately until we find the time to integrate it properly. > Since we are almost ready for 2.4, we should probably not add any new > plug-ins at this point. Makes sense. > > 3. Is it

Re: [Gimp-developer] getting 2.4 out of the door

2007-01-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/19/07, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > I am done with some of the 2.4 bugs, but I think that it will take > too much time to implement the missing features: finish the > conversion from and to EXIF, add the conversion from and to IPTC, > finish the widget re-organization, add descriptions and help >

Re: [Gimp-developer] getting 2.4 out of the door

2007-01-19 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/19/07, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > - The metadata editor works with XMP, which is a superset of the other > metadata formats and can be extended easily. So instead of keeping > the EXIF block in memory and fetching values from it on request (as > done by libexif and most other libraries),

Re: [Gimp-developer] Meaning of delay in screenshot plugin

2007-01-30 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/30/07, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > For my part, I've been awfully tempted to port the GTK 1.2 file load > and save dialogs forward to GTK 2.x. I suspect that my limited time > is better spent on Gutenprint and perhaps KPhotoAlbum, but those > dialogs are simply very painful to use. http://pro

Re: [Gimp-developer] Meaning of delay in screenshot plugin

2007-01-30 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 1/30/07, Marco Ciampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:10:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How about this: get rid of the delay completely, and instead take the > > screenshot when a certain key (eg. F12) is pressed? > It could be an answer if: > > 1) the key is cu

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As JPG Integrated (mockup)

2007-02-06 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/6/07, peter sikking wrote: > So I think, right now, that the all the image area should be used > to preview the jpg, with a Preview checkbox, for the users like > Thorsten who want to do original/jpg comparisons. While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the current dialo

Re: [Gimp-developer] strange localization behaviour (gimp-2.3-svn)

2007-02-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/6/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:38 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > I just noted this strange behaviour: when I see the the > > Image menu->View->Display filters->Color Deficient Vision options > > (Protanopia, Deuteranopia, Tritanopia) with the I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As JPG Integrated

2007-02-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/7/07, gg wrote: > I should probably have chosen a more precise and less emotive term than > lame. In chosing "save for the web" the use indicates he does not know > what is involved and is expecting gimp to magically do it for him, not > unreasonably since the program is offering that as an o

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As JPG Integrated (mockup)

2007-02-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/7/07, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 05:39 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > > While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the > > current dialog that enabling preview also calculates size of resulted > > file? I alread

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As JPG Integrated (mockup)

2007-02-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/8/07, Sven Neumann wrote: > > As of 2.3.14 there is not such tooltip. DIsplay of tooltips is enabled > > in preferences. > > There is. I just checked once more (and I had already checked > yesterday). What I was trying to tell you is that that message exists, but doesn't show up. Which means

  1   2   3   4   5   >