[Zope-dev] Re: Can't fetch externals???

2005-09-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Paul Winkler wrote: Update: I *can* fetch the externals from a different box (my windows laptop, on which i can't successfully build zope because cygwin's python is known-broken and I don't have a C compiler other than cygwin's.) That's no excuse ;) You can build Zope on Windows easily with

[Zope-dev] Re: PermissionGeddon

2005-11-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Florent Guillaume wrote: I've done a big checkin to switch practically everything to the new- style (actually they're 5 years old) security declarations. I'd appreciate if another set of eyes could double-check everything; while I've taken a number of steps to ensure I didn't make mistakes

[Zope-dev] Re: PermissionGeddon

2005-11-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Florent Guillaume wrote: Ok I just fixed SecurityInfo, could you update AccessControl/ and recheck please? Florent Hi Florent. All our unit tests pass again. I'm really looking forward for having a new Zope .0 release which might be compatible with an existing Plone release ;) Great

[Zope-dev] Re: Release schedule for Zope 2.11/3.4?

2006-09-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Martijn Faassen wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On 12. September 2006 13:06:05 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another point with this whole half-yr release cycle: we're going to confuse more and more professional users about which Zope version to use for what. I've

[Zope-dev] Re: ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, Martijn Faassen wrote: Hey, I only caught this message earlier today, but this is really cool! It's really nice to see some zope 2 recipes and I hope they indeed will end up on svn.zope.org soon! I have sent my contributer agreement per snail-mail last week to Zope Corp. so it might

[Zope-dev] Re: ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Hey, Just some feedback in case you haven't gotten this already: I have problem running bin/buildout as it seems to fail getting workingenv.py from the cheeseshop: zc.buildout.easy_install: Getting new distribution for workingenv.py=0.3 Page at

[Zope-dev] Re: ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martin Aspeli wrote: I just emailed Hanno a few questions, but I thought I'd post them here as well for further discussion: - Is it so that I should check out ploneout, run boostrap.py, then ../bin/buildout.sh for each project? Or can I somehow use the same checkout of ploneout for

[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On 1/18/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Considering installation of Products we're in new territory anyway - they're not eggs, after all. I see in the result of ploneout that they get symlinked into the Products directory - will

[Zope-dev] Re: ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martin Aspeli wrote: This thread is getting rather long... :) But except for the interaction of workingenv and buildout, which I'm not smart enough to say anything useful about, we are almost finished ;) - There is a 2.5 branch of ploneout (http://svn.plone.org/svn/ploneout/branches/2.5)

[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: Acquisition and __parent__ pointers

2007-01-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, I had a few minutes to spare and took a quick look at the implementation. Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: As for the implementation, I gave it my best shot in the philikon-aq-and-__parent__ branch. My experience with C is limited, especially when it comes to debugging. Help is therefore

[Zope-dev] Re: ploneout - Or how using zc.buildout for a common Zope2 project might look like

2007-01-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
whit wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: whit wrote: ... Specific use cases would help to guide this. the main usecase for me is the following... hanno writes a recipe for plone, and I want to use that recipe as part of setting up a openplans development environment (for example inside my workingenv

[Zope-dev] ZopeTestCase.doctest is not aware of local sites

2007-03-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi all, while pushing local site support in CMF/Plone I came across some weird test failures. After a while of debbuging I could track this down to the http method in ZopeTestCase's doctest support. The method in its Zope2 incarnation is not aware of local sites, while the one in

[Zope-dev] Re: ZopeTestCase.doctest is not aware of local sites

2007-03-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi again, I just noticed that the publish method from the Functional base class from ZopeTestCase has the same problem. You can find the adjusted test attached. Hanno Hanno Schlichting wrote: Hi all, while pushing local site support in CMF/Plone I came across some weird test failures

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Support for using zopectl on Windows has been added.

2007-05-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
developers, so should be reasonable stable. Hanno Hanno Schlichting wrote: Log message for revision 75066: Support for using zopectl on Windows has been added. All commands are supported and there are two Windows specific ones: install and remove, which install or remove the Windows

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Support for using zopectl on Windows has been added.

2007-05-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Chris Withers wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I have just recently been given zope.org SVN write access and made my first bigger change - making zopectl work on Windows. Please review and test my changes. The change I made is based on code that I had in the plone.recipe.zope2instance

[Zope-dev] State of the philikon-aq-and-__parent__ branch

2007-06-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, as some of you may have noticed I worked a bit more on philikon's branch which makes Acquisition and in return the Zope2 security machinery aware of __parent__ pointers. The branch can be found here: svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/philikon-aq-and-__parent__ The current

[Zope-dev] Re: State of the philikon-aq-and-__parent__ branch

2007-06-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Martin Aspeli wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: as some of you may have noticed I worked a bit more on philikon's branch which makes Acquisition and in return the Zope2 security machinery aware of __parent__ pointers. The current state is that there's only one test failure left in Five

[Zope-dev] Re: State of the philikon-aq-and-__parent__ branch

2007-06-24 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: as some of you may have noticed I worked a bit more on philikon's branch which makes Acquisition and in return the Zope2 security machinery aware of __parent__ pointers. Yay, thanks Hanno! As I won't have much time to work

[Zope-dev] Re: Moving the Zope 2 bugtracker to Launchpad

2007-08-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On 13 Aug 2007, at 11:11, Hanno Schlichting wrote: One could also move the CMF bugtracker to LP at the same time. Then only the APE and the PAS trackers would remain. The PAS tracker is already empty and the APE tracker is also pretty much obsolete and contains only

[Zope-dev] Re: Moving the Zope 2 bugtracker to Launchpad

2007-08-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 12. August 2007 19:53:57 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to make it short: I propose to move the Zope 2 bugtracker to Launchpad. Since the Zope 3 bugtracker works already with success on LP we should follow with the Zope 2 bugtracker. Objections? +1,

[Zope-dev] Re: request.locale

2007-09-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Laurence Rowe wrote: Quite a lot of zope3 code (zc.datetimewidget for instance) expects to be able to access request.locale. ZPublisher does not provide this and to get around the limitation you must manually set request.locale in your view using Products.CMFDefault.formlib.form.getLocale.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: request.locale

2007-09-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Dieter Maurer wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2007-9-8 00:47 +0200: ... My suggestion on this would be to make request.locale available in Zope 2.11. It would not be available through any of the other means like request['locale'] or request.form['locale'] but just as a simple property

[Zope-dev] Re: request.locale

2007-09-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Dieter Maurer wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2007-9-9 11:58 +0200: ... Obviously this needs a bit of rather hairy code Indeed, as you must not define 'locale' as a request attribute (it may hide 'locale' set otherwise) but otherwise let it behave as if it were an attribute. We already

[Zope-dev] Re: request.locale

2007-09-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: We already do something similar for the request.debug variable, but this uses a stack frame hack which limits the debug attribute to be shown to code in the zope.* packages. For the locale this is an undesired limitation as other

[Zope-dev] Undeprecation of manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete?

2007-10-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Zope 2 currently emits deprecation warnings about old-style event methods in OFS, for example manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete. The deprecation warning states that these methods won't be called anymore in Zope 2.11. I would like to turn this deprecation warning into a discouraged

[Zope-dev] Re: Undeprecation of manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete?

2007-10-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Lennart Regebro wrote: On 10/9/07, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plone 3.0 needs Zope 2.10.3, anything earlier does not work. Oh, I thought the idea was to always support two Zope versions? I'm happy to hear that this isn't the case. For 3.0 we needed the improved local

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Added LAZY_FILE_LOADING constant to PageTemplateFile. When set to True Page Template files aren't lo

2007-10-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Christian Theune wrote: Cool, Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2007, 17:16 -0400 schrieb Hanno Schlichting: Log message for revision 80896: Added LAZY_FILE_LOADING constant to PageTemplateFile. When set to True Page Template files aren't lo aded and parsed on Zope startup anymore

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: zope.component/trunk/ Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for

2007-11-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Log message for revision 81348: Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids looping over all utilities when registering a new one. You

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: zope.component/trunk/ Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for

2007-11-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Log message for revision 81348: Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids looping over all

[Zope-dev] Re: Additional locales for zope.i18n.locales.data?

2007-11-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Nathan Yergler wrote: On 11/27/07, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan Yergler wrote: I've run into a problem this morning with i18n in Zope3, and I'm not exactly sure what the appropriate approach is. We have a set of South African translations, paticularly Zulu (zu)

[Zope-dev] Re: [OFF] Does Zope developers have time machine?

2007-11-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Mikhail Kashkin wrote: Looks like open source developers, especial Zope 3, have enough money to buy Time machine. Check Zope 3 profile on Ohloh.net http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4495?p=Zope+3 Codebase 138,855,676 LOC Effort (est.) 49267 Person Years $2,709,689,938 This is

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] Stepping forward and going beta

2007-12-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Dec 9, 2007 5:30 AM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Objections? Thoughts? That branch didn't look like it was far off being finished. Is there a TODO of what is pending to finish it? The good news is that all Zope tests are passing and all the heavy lifting

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] Stepping forward and going beta

2007-12-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: the Zope 2.11 beta phase has been delayed for while. The reason for holding but the release was Philipps and Hannos work on the http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/philikon-aq/ branch. Unfortunately both can't work (lack of personal time) on the branch and finish it in

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] Stepping forward and going beta

2007-12-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hanno Schlichting wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: The only thing I'm going to do if no one objects is to deprecate calling the ViewPageTemplateFile in Five without passing in the view. This should at least allow us to merge the aq-branch without any problems for Zope 2.13 if noone can think

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] KGS incomplete (Was: Stepping forward and going beta)

2007-12-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: On 24 Dec 2007, at 16:32 , Andreas Jung wrote: WARN: KGS incomplete - zope.app.content_types not found WARN: KGS incomplete - zope.app.event not found WARN: KGS incomplete - zope.app.filerepresentation not found WARN: KGS incomplete - zope.app.location not

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] KGS incomplete (Was: Stepping forward and going beta)

2007-12-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 28. Dezember 2007 17:56:20 +0100 Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now all of those above packages aren't in the beta1 tarball. I'd consider this a bug, right? I removed the externals so they are not in the b1 tarball. Possibly a bug from the deprecation

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope 2.11] KGS incomplete (Was: Stepping forward and going beta)

2007-12-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 29. Dezember 2007 08:17:43 +0100 Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding those deprecated but still functional packages to the KGS would be one way, but seems to be a bit of work. I just wonder what deprecation in the future means. There were some

[Zope-dev] Re: Acquisition in Python2.5

2008-01-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Nikhil N wrote: Hmm, very strange. I just did: I used: $ workingenv aq $ source aq/bin/activate $ easy_install Acquisition $ python For both Python 2.4 and 2.5 and can reproduce the problem. from ExtensionClass import Base from Acquisition import Implicit class

[Zope-dev] Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Martin Aspeli wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Technically, I think that this is going to be hard. You'd need to patch in the magic acquisition base class. Acquisition is the main reason that some of the code needed to be duplicated - without the existence of acquisition wrappers, security

[Zope-dev] Re: [Launchpad] Permissions for changing status of a ticket?

2008-04-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Morning! Andreas Jung wrote: last night, roughly 20 tickets of the Zope 2 tracker were marked as Invalid by a person (never heard its name) which is no part of the Zope 2 developers group on LP. Independent of each ticket I am a bit surprised that obviously any authenticated LP user is able

[Zope-dev] Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Alexander Limi wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:11:11 -0700, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *IF* you'd like to be pragmatic, I'd suggest we clean up those failing Plone tests, merge the branch and be on our way. This gets back to Hanno's suggestion

[Zope-dev] AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi again. Hanno Schlichting wrote: I kept my promise and added the simple tests for the first two issues I found while doing testing against Plone. I have meanwhile fixed the first trivial issue (conflicting argument called 'instance') and added a simple test for the second one. Now after

[Zope-dev] Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

2008-04-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I'd like to propose to merge the philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk aka Zope 2.12. Scope: For those unfamiliar with the branch, it makes Acquisition aware of __parent__ pointers. This makes it unnecessary to use Acquisition mixin's for Zope 3 code to use them in Zope 2 code. The

[Zope-dev] Re: AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: In my opinion, the fact that it accidentally worked as an instance variable isn't a very strong argument for continuing to support it. To me, this is a prime example of misusing a Five

[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

2008-04-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Merging it into Zope trunk will get it into the Zope 2.12 release which is at this point not scheduled yet, but is unlikely to get a release before early 2009. This should give us plenty of time to test. This sounds good. Here's

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2 eggification [was: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk]

2008-04-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Chris McDonough wrote: True, although the Zope2 instance-creation scripts will probably become setuptools console scripts, which means that things will likely need to get shuffled around a bit from how things are now regardless and old hands will be baffled anyway. repoze.zope2 needs

[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

2008-04-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Hanno Schlichting wrote: I'd like to propose to merge the philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk aka Zope 2.12. [...] Timeline: I would like to do the merge as soon as possible, so people can easily test it against all their applications and report back problems. Just as a note

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 interfaces delenda est!

2008-04-25 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: I'd like to rip out the old Interface module from the 2.11 branch and the trunk, along with all the useless decoys which import it. THere is no *good* BBB reason to keep them around: anybody still depending on them in A.G. 2008 needs to switch over, anyway. Objections?

[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

2008-04-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hanno Schlichting wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I'd like to propose to merge the philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk aka Zope 2.12. [...] Timeline: I would like to do the merge as soon as possible, so people can easily test it against all their applications and report back problems

[Zope-dev] Proposal: Deprecate GlobalTranslationService and FiveTranslationService

2008-04-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I'd like to propose to deprecate the Products.PageTemplates.GlobalTranslationService module and all custom translation handling from Products.Five. Rationale: In order to bring zope.i18n translation handling to the masses, some backwards compatibility code for

[Zope-dev] Re: buildbot.zope.org?

2008-04-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Christian Theune wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:57:07AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: Any idea what's wrong with Zope2.buildout? Looks like Acquisition is not built properly: http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/builders/Zope2.buildout/builds/75/steps/test/logs/stdio No idea, the egg it has is

[Zope-dev] Re: buildbot.zope.org?

2008-04-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hanno Schlichting wrote: Christian Theune wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:57:07AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: Any idea what's wrong with Zope2.buildout? Looks like Acquisition is not built properly: http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/builders/Zope2.buildout/builds/75/steps/test/logs/stdio

[Zope-dev] Re: zope.app.locales i18nmergeall.py not used anymore?

2008-04-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Christophe Combelles wrote: I think merging is not really done, and there are several changes to do for i18n: - split the zope gettext domain into all the separate namespaces. Maybe only zope.app.* packages can be kept under the zope.app domain. Just as a side note, I added a feature to

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 monitoring

2008-04-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris McDonough wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Apr 30, 2008, at 12:41 , Christian Theune wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:16:53PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I'm trying to figure out what the current state of the art for monitoring Zope2 processes is. Ideally I'ld want the equivalent of

[Zope-dev] Re: New i18n locale extraction concept

2008-05-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Roger Ineichen wrote: I added a new package for extract i18n locales and I have some questions. Is it posible to split the zope.app.locales package into a package which offers the interfaces and classes e.g. PotMaker, the generic extract.py file and another one which provides the

[Zope-dev] Re: AW: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: New i18n locale extraction concept

2008-05-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Roger Ineichen wrote: Anyway, Since zcml is a default part of zope locale extraction it make no sense to me to not using a working setup for locale extraction. Grok? Does Grok not use zcml extraction? If not, we could probably change the z3c.recipe and disable the default zcml extractor.

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 porting Acquisition

2008-05-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. ranjith kannikara wrote: I came across an error in module Acquisition, while trying to port zope2 to python2.5. There was a discussion over the same topic in JAN-2008. In acquisition the wrapper compare is returning false irrespective of the parameters. And the problem I stuck with was

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 porting Acquisition

2008-05-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Hanno Schlichting wrote: ranjith kannikara wrote: I came across an error in module Acquisition, while trying to port zope2 to python2.5. There was a discussion over the same topic in JAN-2008. In acquisition the wrapper compare is returning false irrespective of the parameters

[Zope-dev] Re: setuptools extension for buildout old-style tar-balls?

2008-06-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: lots of old-style Zope products are now available as eggs. However a lot of people still don't work with buildout and need the old-style tar-balls. Does anyone know of a setuptools extension for generating and upload the tar-balls directly from a Products. package?

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: z3c.pt/trunk/ In debug mode the actual source code for file templates is written out to a filename.source file, to make it easier to inspect it.

2008-06-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Log message for revision 87393: In debug mode the actual source code for file templates is written out to a filename.source file, to make it easier to inspect it. Make debug mode setting explicit in a config.py. Currently it is bound

[Zope-dev] Re: Test runner: layers, subprocesses, and tear down

2008-07-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Benji York wrote: If you use zc.buildout, then you can try the branch by checking it out, adding a develop entry into your buildout config referencing it, and updating any version spec for zope.testing to 3.6dev. I'd really like third-party confirmation of the total test time reductions

[Zope-dev] Re: Product version number redundancy with version.txt and setup.py

2008-07-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tim Hicks wrote: Am I right in thinking that there is a duplication of information in having an eggified product's version number stored in setup.py and version.txt? Having your setup.py read its version from version.txt is easy, if you don't want to update two places. I think the more

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 3 on Python 2.5, Zope 3 releases

2008-07-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris Withers wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Certainly, running Python 2.4 and Zope 2.10 compiled with mingw32 on Windows as per http://plone.org/documentation/tutorial/buildout has not given us any problems after a few months of using it. I would expect the above to work as *everything* is

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.i18n/branches/regebro-pluralsupport/src/zope/i18n/ Changed the API. It's unwieldy as it is, so better have separate methods

2008-07-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. It's awesome to see some progress on this. You are aware of the Gettext manual at http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms right? Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Lennart Regebro wrote: While talking about this, what would a ZPT

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.i18n/branches/regebro-pluralsupport/src/zope/i18n/ Changed the API. It's unwieldy as it is, so better have separate methods

2008-07-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Sorry. There's some garbage in my last message. Disregard the following bits. Hanno Schlichting wrote: br i18n:attributes= You selected span tal:content=num i18n:name=num5/span out of span tal:content=total i18n:name=total10/span files. /p Can someone think about an example involving

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.i18n/branches/regebro-pluralsupport/src/zope/i18n/ Changed the API. It's unwieldy as it is, so better have separate methods

2008-07-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Lennart Regebro wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 22:36, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: p i18n:translate= You have to pay span tal:content=view/formatted_amount i18n:name=amount i18n:count=view/amount6 dollars/span. /p In this case the underlying value is a simple integer

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 3 on Python 2.5, Zope 3 releases

2008-07-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris Withers wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Okay, so we can safely add Chris (and also Philipp) to the list of people maintaining our windows binary eggs. Awesome! Chris, do you think you can take it from here in getting an environment set up? Would be rgeat to have a bullet point list for

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope 3 on Python 2.5, Zope 3 releases

2008-07-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris Withers wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would be rgeat to have a bullet point list for how to get a suitable environment set up given that I don't have mingw32 and have never used it before in my life :-S Like

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 porting failure in Products

2008-07-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ranjith kannikara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I hope the code for this assert (used in line assert self.aq_base == self ) is defined for zope and can be fixed with not so much effort. Can any one suggest where why these different

[Zope-dev] New zope.interface 3.4.2 release

2008-07-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Would someone (Jim, Philikon, Fred) be willing to do a new zope.interface release or give me access rights on PyPi to do it myself? Thanks, Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No

[Zope-dev] Re: New zope.interface 3.4.2 release

2008-07-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Fred Drake wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would someone (Jim, Philikon, Fred) be willing to do a new zope.interface release or give me access rights on PyPi to do it myself? I've added Stephan Richter and Andreas Jung to the project on PyPI

Re: [Zope-dev] weird release of transaction module

2008-08-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: I just looked at the PyPI page of 'transaction': http://pypi.python.org/pypi/transaction And I see some weirdnesses: * it's called 'transaction 1.0a1' * the 'changes' claim however: 1.0 (unreleased) What's up? Clearly something went wrong during the

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but not released

2008-09-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: There appears to be a release of zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 which requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but zope.testing 3.6.0 was not released as far as I can see. This means zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 cannot be installed. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.testing/3.6.0 This

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but not released

2008-09-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 4. September 2008 13:38:27 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There appears to be a release of zc.recipe.testrunner 1.1.0 which requires zope.testing 3.6.0, but zope.testing 3.6.0 was not released as far as I can see. This means zc.recipe.testrunner

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.i18n dependencies

2008-09-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Wichert Akkerman wrote: I was wondering why a non-zope project was pulling in zope.publisher and ended up finding this chain: chameleon.core - zope.i18n - zope.component[zcml] - zope.security - zope.location - zope.traversing - zope.publisher can we move the zcml components of

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - supported Python versions

2008-10-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: Depends on which Python versions we want/must support for the future. One option would to jump on Python 2.6 for the next releases (skipping Python 2.5 and dropping Python 2.4 support). Just as a voice from the Plone crowd. With our current planned roadmap we won't move to

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - supported Python versions

2008-10-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: RestrictedPython: I talked with Alan Runyan about this topic at the Plone conferenceif we are serious then RP has to be reviewed. But who can review it and how long would it take. There are possibly only a limited number of people with the experience and skills for

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - supported Python versions

2008-10-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Sidnei da Silva wrote: I don't want to rain on your parade, but I already did a first pass at reviewing the changes in Python 2.5 and Python 2.6. There are no significant changes that I could spot so far. Apparently the major changes are:

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 - supported Python versions

2008-10-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean the review of RestrictedPython? Yes. If RestrictedPython is to be reviewed for changes, it *might* be easier to do this for 2.4 - 2.5 instead of the big leap of two python versions.

[Zope-dev] Proposal: Make Zope2 smaller

2008-10-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I'd like to get feedback on an idea I had recently. Problem Zope2 currently includes large parts of Zope 3. Not all of the zope.* and zope.app.* packages are maintained or are in use. Still Zope 2 includes large amounts of them and thus implicitly advertises them to be used. In addition

[Zope-dev] New zope.interface release

2008-10-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, I just released a new zope.interface 3.5.0 to be found at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.interface I uploaded a zipped source distribution and (as we have C extensions) Windows installers for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. Please contact me, if you find problems with it. Hanno

Re: [Zope-dev] New zope.interface release

2008-10-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hanno Schlichting wrote: I just released a new zope.interface 3.5.0 to be found at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.interface I uploaded a zipped source distribution and (as we have C extensions) Windows installers for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. Spotting my own mistake, I uploaded binary eggs

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: Backporting some Python 2.5/2.6 fixes

2008-10-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris Withers wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. I would *not* backport changes to RestrictedPython because those are actually features (support for newer versions of Python) as

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 features

2008-10-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Here's a list of things I'd like to see in a 2.12 release: - Official Python 2.5 and 2.6 support (almost done, requires a community decision on when we call RestricedPython supported and reviewed) +1 for 2.5; I'm pretty sure 2.6

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 features

2008-10-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I'm fine with having Plone 4 able to run on a 2.6-compatible Zope2. If we add Python 2.6 to the supported list for a no-later-than Q3 2009 Zope release, that should be sufficient, no? Sure! From a Zope perspective 2.11 should have had Python 2.5

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 features

2008-11-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Nov 4, 2008, at 09:10 , Andreas Jung wrote: In the meantime, we can acknowledge that 2.8 and 2.9 are retired (no future work except maybe important security fixes), +1 and announce that 2.10 will be retired after the 2.12 release: We have to care about

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12 features

2008-11-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: On 04.11.2008 18:19 Uhr, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Nov 4, 2008, at 13:59 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: If I'm not mistaken there was something about every release being supported two years after its initial release in those discussions. But time went on, we haven't sticked

Re: [Zope-dev] deprecate http://download.zope.org/distribution

2008-11-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Jim Fulton wrote: http://download.zope.org/distribution was set up as a place to publish distributions while we were learning about setuptools, eggs, and pypi. I think now, we're all using PyPI (or local repositories). I'd like to deprecate this site, making it read-only for now, but

[Zope-dev] Update on Zope2 egg and correct / minimal dependencies

2008-11-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I had some time to work on the Zope2 egg and the correct / minimal dependency set. The current work is at: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope2.buildout/trunk This gives you a Zope2 egg in a buildout environment with the latest releases of all dependencies included. The Zope2 egg itself

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.sendmail/trunk/ Copied over the UtilityTerm and UtilityVocabulary implementation from zope.app.component to avoid a dependency.

2008-11-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Benji York wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log message for revision 92953: Copied over the UtilityTerm and UtilityVocabulary implementation from zope.app.component to avoid a dependency. Instead of duplicating the code there should

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed]

2008-11-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I just looked over this and fixed one test failure in Five. In general all tests pass now, when run from the eggified Zope in: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope2.buildout/trunk I guess that the zope.testbrowser problems are a mix of test interdependencies and maybe a differing mechanize

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed]

2008-12-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: In general all tests pass now, when run from the eggified Zope in: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope2.buildout/trunk I just vendor imported mechanize 0.1.9 into the Zope SVN, and have changed the svn:external in my Z2 trunk checkout to point

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.tal/trunk/src/zope/tal/dummyengine.py assert isn't a function, using parens will cause the two arguments to be treated as a 2-tuple, hence always true.

2008-12-08 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Matthew Wilkes wrote: Log message for revision 93717: assert isn't a function, using parens will cause the two arguments to be treated as a 2-tuple, hence always true. Changed: U zope.tal/trunk/src/zope/tal/dummyengine.py -=- Modified:

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2009-01-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jan 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jan 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Yeah, thank you Tres and Stefan! Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist -

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Christian Theune wrote: I noticed 'zope.globalrequest' on the PyPI RSS feed today and wonder about it. IMHO this implements an anti-pattern in an official way without a warning that this needs to be handled with care. The discussion for this happened on the plone-dev mailing list. The

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Chris Withers wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: Namespaces are like dust and smoke. We already have enough (pointless) namespaces. So let's stick with zope.* and z3c.* for Zope related packages. Why note merge those two into one then? Merging namespaces just causes work without any benefit. A

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Jan 16, 2009, at 18:25 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: The concept of giving SVN repositories any kind of quality level aspect failed in the same way. Dependencies are specified in the setup.py and egg metadata. Quality is judged by who has written some code, number

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/tests/common.py Hhm, pdb?!?

2009-01-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Log message for revision 94810: Hhm, pdb?!? Changed: U Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/tests/common.py -=- Modified: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/tests/common.py

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-01-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Tres Seaver wrote: Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jan 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jan 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope 2.12] ImportError: cannot import name aq_inContextOf

2009-01-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: I am currently trying to fix the generation of the creation and configuration of the startup scripts. I am getting this when running zopectl: The debugger output isn't much helpful:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >