Re: COMP refutation paper - finally out

2011-06-13 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
Colin, Thanks for the paper. I have just browsed it. Two small notes. I like [Turing et al., 2008]. It seems that he has passed his test successfully. I find term Natural Computation (NC) a bit confusing. I guess that I understand what you means but the term Computation sounds ambiguously,

Re: COMP refutation paper - finally out

2011-06-14 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
tist, which includes the need to create a liar). It's all quite convoluted, but nevertheless sufficient to help an engineer like me make a design choice... which I have done. I hope over time these ideas will not grate on the mind quite so much. cheers colin Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Colin,

Re: thoughts ?

2011-06-20 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.06.2011 21:13 meekerdb said the following: On 6/20/2011 11:05 AM, selva wrote: it is proved in noetic science that our thoughts(only thoughts and not the actions due to those thoughts)affect our physical environment. Where are these proofs published? I was trying to understand what noe

Re: COMP refutation paper - finally out

2011-06-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 26.06.2011 22:33 meekerdb said the following: On 6/26/2011 12:58 PM, Rex Allen wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bruno Marchal ... The idea that our theories are approaching some metaphysical truth is essentially just the same as assuming there is some more comprehensive and coher

Re: Bruno's blasphemy.

2011-07-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.07.2011 05:14 Constantine Pseudonymous said the following: Bruno assumes that consciousness preceded matter then why do we only find consciousness as a terrestrial phenomena (suns and stars aren't conscious).. and as a later stage terrestrial phenomena for that matter i.e. water, p

Re: Bruno's blasphemy.

2011-07-08 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.07.2011 21:36 meekerdb said the following: On 7/6/2011 12:22 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.07.2011 05:14 Constantine Pseudonymous said the following: Bruno assumes that consciousness preceded matter ... If talk about consciousness, then I guess the next quote from Erwin

Re: Bruno's blasphemy.

2011-07-08 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
k to John Hagelin, see for example http://worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility8.html You may want to compare Schroedinger with him. Evgenii http://blog.rudnyi.ru On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:36 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 7/6/2011 12:22 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.07.2011 05:14 C

Re: Bruno's blasphemy.

2011-07-11 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 10.07.2011 17:32 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 10 Jul 2011, at 15:20, Craig Weinberg wrote: ... Let's take the color yellow for example. If you build a brain out of ideal ping pong balls, or digital molecular emulations, does it perceive yellow from 580nm oscillations of electroma

Re: Bruno's blasphemy.

2011-07-12 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
Bruno, Why don't you make a course for dummies about this? (For example in Second Life) Evgenii On 11.07.2011 16:01 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 11 Jul 2011, at 14:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 10.07.2011 17:32 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 10 Jul 2011, at 15:20,

DVD alloys help make computers that think like us

2011-07-15 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128205.200-dvd-alloys-help-make-computers-that-think-like-us.html "A brain-like computer is one that can learn and adapt without external programming. Such an ability would allow machines to become far better at tasks like face and speech recognition. The

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2011-12-31 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 31.12.2011 09:17 Pierz said the following: On Dec 31, 6:17 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 12/30/2011 12:51 AM, Pierz wrote: On Dec 30, 6:35 pm, meekerdbwrote: On 12/29/2011 4:11 PM, Pierz wrote: You think it is ludicrous that a Mars Rover is programmed to monitor the state of its battery, t

Re: Self-driving cars

2011-12-31 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
29 Dec 2011, at 18:16, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 29.12.2011 16:48 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 28 Dec 2011, at 21:57, meekerdb wrote: ... Another question would be if such a car could be considered as an observer in quantum I don't know whether it's a Lobian machine or

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2011-12-31 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 31.12.2011 22:00 meekerdb said the following: On 12/31/2011 5:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 31.12.2011 09:17 Pierz said the following: On Dec 31, 6:17 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 12/30/2011 12:51 AM, Pierz wrote: On Dec 30, 6:35 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 12/29/2011 4:11 PM, Pierz wrote: You

Re: Self-driving cars

2011-12-31 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 31.12.2011 22:05 meekerdb said the following: On 12/31/2011 6:07 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: So a self-driving car is probably much more close to have a first person view than a rock, especially if you make it possible for the car to memorize its short term instances of computation (sensing

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2012-01-01 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 31.12.2011 22:57 meekerdb said the following: On 12/31/2011 1:33 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 31.12.2011 22:00 meekerdb said the following: ... Completely!? How do you know that? The Mars Rover doesn't just record a sensor value in its computer, it also remember the value and at a

Re: How does comp explain the uncanny valley?

2012-01-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
I have a link to somewhat more positive video: Einstein to teach math and physics in American schools: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkpWCu1k0ZI Yet, I guess the Einstein's head has not reached the uncanny valley yet. Evgenii -- http://blog.rudnyi.ru On 30.12.2011 13:23 Craig Weinberg said

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2012-01-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.01.2012 07:01 meekerdb said the following: On 1/1/2012 4:59 PM, Pierz wrote: ... David says it better than I could have, but just to add that when I say "I" that is just a sort of short-hand for the 1-p perspective. There is no separate experiencer. In UDA, it's simply the notes in a 'd

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2012-01-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.01.2012 21:32 meekerdb said the following: On 1/2/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.01.2012 07:01 meekerdb said the following: ... Everett's MWI is based on QM which does assume a background time and the state of the multiverse evolves in Hilbert space. This evolution en

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2012-01-04 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 03.01.2012 21:42 meekerdb said the following: On 1/3/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.01.2012 21:32 meekerdb said the following: On 1/2/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.01.2012 07:01 meekerdb said the following: ... Everett's MWI is based on QM which does ass

Re: Movie Graph Argument: A Refutation

2012-01-04 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 04.01.2012 21:03 meekerdb said the following: On 1/4/2012 10:55 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 03.01.2012 21:42 meekerdb said the following: On 1/3/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.01.2012 21:32 meekerdb said the following: On 1/2/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 05.01.2012 06:29 John Clark said the following: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Craig Weinbergwrote: Sure, our belief in simulations can make them seem quite realistic to us. That doesn't make them real though. And so simulators join a long long long list of things that you say are not re

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: If to talk about Galileo, then it would also good to remember Feyerabend (for example Against method). Feyerabend has studied the way Galileo has made science a lot and his conclusion: &quo

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
ogies that propel society and it should be treated as such." Other quotes that I like are at http://blog.rudnyi.ru/2012/01/feyerabend-against-science.html Evgenii On 06.01.2012 18:33 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 06 Jan 2012, at 17:54, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.01.2012 17:08

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following: On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... This statement contradict to a normal scientific world view but it is based on historical facts

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 20:35 meekerdb said the following: On 1/6/2012 11:26 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.01.2012 20:13 meekerdb said the following: On 1/6/2012 8:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 06.01.2012 17:08 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... This

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 21:15 meekerdb said the following: On 1/6/2012 12:07 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... I do not know, I cannot exclude that German authorities have some censorship in Internet (or Google censors its content to Germany) but when I run Google scholar http://scholar.google.com/ and

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 20:44 meekerdb said the following: On 1/6/2012 10:14 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Bruno, I have recently finished listening Prof Hoenen's Theorien der Wahrheit where he has also reviewed Feyerabend's Science in a Free Society. Today I wanted to learn more about that boo

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 23:11 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: In fact I do agree often with John Clark, but then he exaggerates also very often the point. I've told you a million times I never exaggerate. The church was asking to Galileo to prese

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.01.2012 22:28 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: This does not mean that everybody has to agree with him [Feyerabend] but a statement about an idiot looks exaggerated. If one can not use the word "idiot" to refer to someon

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
ion and power" only. At least his empirical search has found nothing else. Could you please give examples of the first alternative that you mention? Evgenii On 07.01.2012 12:51 Bruno Marchal said the following: Hi Evgenii, On 06 Jan 2012, at 19:14, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Bruno, I hav

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 07.01.2012 17:21 John Clark said the following: On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: You are free to express your opinion and I am free to express mine. Don't you agree? Yes, and Feyerabend should be free to say anything that pops into his head no matter how silly

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 07.01.2012 18:15 John Clark said the following: Feyerabend Wrote: "Do not be misled by the fact that today hardly anyone gets killed for joining a scientific heresy. This has nothing to do with science. It has something to do with the general quality of our civilization. Heretics in science a

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-13 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 13.01.2012 19:20 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 8:30 AM, John Clark wrote: We can even ascribe it [consciousness] a role (explaining its Darwinian advantage) There is no way consciousness can have a direct Darwinian advantage so it must be a byproduct of something that does ha

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-13 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 13.01.2012 22:39 Craig Weinberg said the following: On Jan 13, 3:54 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 13.01.2012 19:20 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 8:30 AM, John Clark wrote: We can even ascribe it [consciousness] a role (explaining its Darwinian advantage) There is

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-13 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 13.01.2012 22:36 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 12:54 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 13.01.2012 19:20 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 8:30 AM, John Clark wrote: We can even ascribe it [consciousness] a role (explaining its Darwinian advantage) There is no way

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-14 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 14.01.2012 03:06 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 2:50 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 13.01.2012 22:36 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 12:54 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... By the way in the Gray's book the term intelligence is not even in the index. This was the bi

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-14 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 14.01.2012 17:56 meekerdb said the following: On 1/14/2012 12:08 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.01.2012 03:06 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 2:50 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 13.01.2012 22:36 meekerdb said the following: On 1/13/2012 12:54 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... By

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-14 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 14.01.2012 18:12 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 meekerdb wrote: There is no way consciousness can have a direct Darwinian advantage so it must be a byproduct of something that does have that virtue, and the obvious candidate is intelligence.\ That's not so clear si

Re: An analogy for Qualia

2012-01-15 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 14.01.2012 19:56 Stephen P. King said the following: On 1/14/2012 1:15 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.01.2012 18:12 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 meekerdb wrote: There is no way consciousness can have a direct Darwinian advantage so it must be a byproduct of

Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-15 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 14.01.2012 08:21 John Clark said the following: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote: … > For heavens sake, I went into quite a lot of detail about how the > code is executed so that protein gets made, and it could not be more > clear that the cell factory contains digital machines.

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-18 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 18.01.2012 18:47 John Clark said the following: On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: " Some physicists say that information is related to the entropy" That is incorrect, ALL physicists say that information is related to entropy. There are quite a number of d

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-19 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
red by order, a maximum of order is conveyed by a maximum of disorder. Obviously, this is a Babylonian muddle. Somebody or something has confounded our language." -- http://blog.rudnyi.ru On 18.01.2012 23:42 Russell Standish said the following: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:13:07PM +0100, Ev

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-19 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 19.01.2012 06:37 meekerdb said the following: On 1/18/2012 11:13 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... If you look around you may still find species of scientists who still are working with classical thermodynamics (search for example for CALPHAD). Well, if you refer to them as physicists or not

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-19 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 19.01.2012 20:41 meekerdb said the following: On 1/19/2012 11:06 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 19.01.2012 06:37 meekerdb said the following: On 1/18/2012 11:13 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... If you look around you may still find species of scientists who still are working with classical

Re: Consciousness Easy, Zombies Hard

2012-01-20 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.01.2012 02:34 Jason Resch said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Craig Weinbergwrote: On Jan 19, 4:56 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: Yes. Craig argue that machine cannot thinks by pointing on its fridge. Are you afraid to burn coal in your stove out of concern that the mate

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-20 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.01.2012 18:21 John Clark said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote: ... "If you define the universe as deterministic from the beginning, then [...]" I most certainly do not! We know the universe is NOT deterministic but we also know that everything, absolutel

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-20 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.01.2012 21:28 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: " What about Big Bang?" What about Big Bang? " It has also happened for a reason?" I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a reason or it did not happen for a r

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 08:12 meekerdb said the following: On 1/20/2012 12:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 20.01.2012 21:28 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: " What about Big Bang?" What about Big Bang? " It has also happened for a reason?

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 10:00 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 12:43 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 21.01.2012 08:12 meekerdb said the following: On 1/20/2012 12:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 20.01.2012 21:28 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: "

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.01.2012 05:59 Russell Standish said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:03:41PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Basically I do not understand what the term information then brings. One can certainly state that information is the same as the entropy (we are free with definitions

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 20:00 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 4:25 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... 2) If physicists say that information is the entropy, they must take it literally and then apply experimental thermodynamics to measure information. This however seems not to happen. It does

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 21:01 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 11:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 21.01.2012 20:00 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 4:25 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... 2) If physicists say that information is the entropy, they must take it literally and then apply

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-21 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 20:54 John Clark said the following: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: " It [the Big Bang] has also happened for a reason?" " I have no idea, but I do know it happened for a reason or it did not happen for a reason." "Well,

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 21.01.2012 22:03 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following: On 21.01.2012 21:01 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 11:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 21.01.2012 20:00 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 4:25 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... 2) If physicists say that information is

Turing Test and Female Hormones

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
t; is equivalent with a type of "no zombie" principle. > On 16.01.2012 11:20 Bruno Marchal said the following: > > On 15 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: >> >> What about the Turing test for a person in that state to check if >> he still has consci

Re: Turing Test and Female Hormones

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
7;s book is not a scientific book in the strict sense. He discusses rather what our society should look like in the future. He claims that open code/open culture leads to cybernetic totalism and fights against it. Evgenii On 22.01.2012 18:06 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 22 Jan 2012, at 14:1

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 22.01.2012 18:39 John Clark said the following: On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote " Yes, but there is nothing illogical about infinite progressions; or maybe the Big Bang happened for no reason, nothing illogical about that either." " This would contr

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 20.01.2012 05:59 Russell Standish said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:03:41PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... and since information is measured by order, a maximum of order is conveyed by a maximum of disorder. Obviously, this is a Babylonian muddle. Somebody or something has

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-01-22 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 22.01.2012 19:52 John Clark said the following: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: "I would say though that "something does not happen for a reason" and "something happens for no reason" are two completely different statements. Don't you ag

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-25 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 23.01.2012 01:26 Russell Standish said the following: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:16:23PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 20.01.2012 05:59 Russell Standish said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:03:41PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... and since information is measured by order

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-25 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 24.01.2012 13:49 Craig Weinberg said the following: If you are instead saying that they are inversely proportional then I would agree in general - information can be considered negentropy. Sorry, I thought you were saying that they are directly proportional measures (Brent and Evgenii seem to

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-25 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 24.01.2012 22:56 meekerdb said the following: In thinking about how to answer this I came across an excellent paper by Roman Frigg and Charlotte Werndl http://www.romanfrigg.org/writings/EntropyGuide.pdf which explicates the relation more comprehensively than I could and which also gives som

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 25.01.2012 21:25 meekerdb said the following: On 1/25/2012 11:47 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Let me suggest a very simple case to understand better what you are saying. Let us consider a string "10" for simplicity. Let us consider the next cases. I will cite first the the

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 26.01.2012 12:00 Russell Standish said the following: On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:47:03PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Let me suggest a very simple case to understand better what you are saying. Let us consider a string "10" for simplicity. Let us consider the next cases. I will

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 26.01.2012 19:01 John Clark said the following: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Craig Weinbergwrote: ... If I have red legos and white legos, and I build two opposite monochrome houses and one of mixed blocks, how in the world does that effect the entropy of the plastic bricks in any way

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 27.01.2012 05:11 meekerdb said the following: On 1/26/2012 5:03 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: ... I'm just curious, not trying to argue with you about it. On a similar note, I was wondering about heat loss in a vacuum today. With the second law of thermodynamics, it seems like heat could only

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 27.01.2012 21:22 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 11:21 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 25.01.2012 21:25 meekerdb said the following: On 1/25/2012 11:47 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Let me suggest a very simple case to understand better what you are saying. Let us consider a string

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 27.01.2012 23:03 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 12:43 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 27.01.2012 21:22 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 11:21 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 25.01.2012 21:25 meekerdb said the following: On 1/25/2012 11:47 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Let

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-27 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 27.01.2012 23:46 Russell Standish said the following: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:27:31PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 26.01.2012 12:00 Russell Standish said the following: If you included these two bits, the thermodynamic entropy is two bits less, = 4.15 x 10^{-24} J/K less This is so

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-28 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 28.01.2012 00:24 Craig Weinberg said the following: On Jan 27, 1:31 pm, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Craig Weinbergwrote: With the second law of thermodynamics, it seems like heat could only dissipate by heating something else up. The second law says that energy wil

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-28 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 28.01.2012 11:20 Russell Standish said the following: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 27.01.2012 23:46 Russell Standish said the following: For one thing, it indicates to storing just two bits of information on these physical substrates is grossly

Re: Qualia and mathematics

2012-01-28 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 26.01.2012 07:19 Pierz said the following: As I continue to ponder the UDA, I keep coming back to a niggling doubt that an arithmetical ontology can ever really give a satisfactory explanation of qualia. It seems to me that imputing qualia to calculations (indeed consciousness at all, thought

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-29 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 28.01.2012 23:26 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 11:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... You disagree that engineers do not use thermodynamic entropy Yes. I disagreed that information "has nothing to do with thermodynamic entropy", as you wrote above. You keep

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-01-29 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 00:42 Russell Standish said the following: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:05:57PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... In general we are surrounded devices that store information (hard discs, memory sticks, DVD, etc.). The information that these devices can store, I believe, is known

Re: Qualia and mathematics

2012-01-29 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 00:15 Pierz said the following: On Jan 28, 11:04 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 26.01.2012 07:19 Pierz said the following: As I continue to ponder the UDA, I keep coming back to a niggling doubt that an arithmetical ontology can ever really give a satisfactory explanation of

Re: Qualia and mathematics

2012-01-29 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 00:57 meekerdb said the following: On 1/28/2012 3:15 PM, Pierz wrote: On Jan 28, 11:04 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Let my quote Jeffrey Gray (Consciousness: Creeping up on the Hard Problem, p. 33) on biology and physics. "In very general terms, biology makes use o

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-01 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 22:49 Russell Standish said the following: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:23:12PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 28.01.2012 23:26 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 11:47 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: A good suggestion. It well might be that I express my thoughts unclear, sorry

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-01 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 23:00 Russell Standish said the following: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30:38PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: The problem that I see is that the entropy changes when the temperature changes. Or do you claim that the entropy of the memory stick/DVD/hard disc remains the same when its

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-01 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 23:06 Russell Standish said the following: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:41:27PM -0800, meekerdb wrote: On 1/28/2012 3:42 PM, Russell Standish wrote: On the other hand, if you just gave me the metallic platter from the hard disk, and did not restrict in any way the technology used to

Re: Qualia and mathematics

2012-02-01 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 29.01.2012 23:47 meekerdb said the following: On 1/29/2012 9:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 29.01.2012 00:57 meekerdb said the following: On 1/28/2012 3:15 PM, Pierz wrote: On Jan 28, 11:04 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... Let my quote Jeffrey Gray (Consciousness: Creeping up on the

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.02.2012 19:12 John Clark said the following: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Could you please give me an example of a physical property that is context dependent? Off the top of my head, mass, velocity, duration and length. John K Clark Could you please

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
our context, try to explain by the portion we know of - as if it was the totality - and live in our happy conventional scientific terms. Human ingenuity constructed a miraculous science and technology that is ALMOST good (some mistakes notwithstanding occurring), then comes M. Curie, Watson-Crick,

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 01.02.2012 21:51 Stephen P. King said the following: On 2/1/2012 3:10 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 29.01.2012 22:49 Russell Standish said the following: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:23:12PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 28.01.2012 23:26 meekerdb said the following: On 1/27/2012 11:47 PM

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-02 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.02.2012 20:00 meekerdb said the following: On 2/2/2012 10:35 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Yes, but when we speak about information carrier (book, a hard drive, DVD, flash memory) it is exactly the same. And it has nothing to do with the total number of physical states in the device, as this

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 03.02.2012 00:14 Jason Resch said the following: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 21.01.2012 22:03 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following: On 21.01.2012 21:01 meekerdb said the following: On 1/21/2012 11:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 21.01.2012 20:00 meekerdb

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.02.2012 22:18 Russell Standish said the following: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:45:53PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 01.02.2012 21:51 Stephen P. King said the following: On 2/1/2012 3:10 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: First the thermodynamic entropy is not context depended. This must mean

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.02.2012 22:35 Russell Standish said the following: On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 29.01.2012 23:06 Russell Standish said the following: Absolutely! But at zero kelvin, the information storage capacity of the device is precisely zero, so cooling only

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 02.02.2012 21:49 meekerdb said the following: On 2/2/2012 12:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:54 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 1/30/2012 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:08 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 1/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: So kind of you to inform us of your uns

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-03 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 03.02.2012 22:07 meekerdb said the following: On 2/3/2012 12:23 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.02.2012 21:49 meekerdb said the following: On 2/2/2012 12:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:54 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 1/30/2012 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:08 pm

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-04 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 04.02.2012 01:10 meekerdb said the following: On 2/3/2012 1:50 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 03.02.2012 22:07 meekerdb said the following: On 2/3/2012 12:23 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.02.2012 21:49 meekerdb said the following: On 2/2/2012 12:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-04 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
lowing: On 03 Feb 2012, at 21:23, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 02.02.2012 21:49 meekerdb said the following: On 2/2/2012 12:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:54 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 1/30/2012 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jan 30, 6:08 pm, meekerdb wrote: On 1/30/2012 2:52 PM, Craig

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-05 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 04.02.2012 21:05 meekerdb said the following: > On 2/4/2012 9:09 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... >> As for computers having emotions, I am a practitioner and I am >> working right now closely with engineers. I should say that the >> modern market would love electronic

Re: Intelligence and consciousness

2012-02-05 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
nt to get/keep/increase the market share. Hence if you do not consider emotions at all, you do not get paid. Evgenii On 04.02.2012 22:42 Bruno Marchal said the following: Hi Evgenyi, On 04 Feb 2012, at 18:09, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: Also, if your theory is that we (in the 3-sense) are

Entropy: A Guide for the Perplexed

2012-02-05 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 24.01.2012 22:56 meekerdb said the following: In thinking about how to answer this I came across an excellent paper by Roman Frigg and Charlotte Werndl http://www.romanfrigg.org/writings/EntropyGuide.pdf which explicates the relation more comprehensively than I could and which also gives som

Re: Entropy: A Guide for the Perplexed

2012-02-05 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 05.02.2012 17:16 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following: On 24.01.2012 22:56 meekerdb said the following: In thinking about how to answer this I came across an excellent paper by Roman Frigg and Charlotte Werndl http://www.romanfrigg.org/writings/EntropyGuide.pdf which explicates the relation

Re: Entropy: A Guide for the Perplexed

2012-02-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 05.02.2012 22:33 Russell Standish said the following: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: The most funny it looks in the conclusion p. 28(142) "First, all notions of entropy discussed in this essay, except the thermodynamic and the topological entropy, c

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 05.02.2012 22:46 Russell Standish said the following: On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:56:10PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: First, we have not to forget the Third Law that states that the change in entropy in any reaction, as well its derivatives, goes to zero as the temperatures goes to zero

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 05.02.2012 23:05 Russell Standish said the following: On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:50:40PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: I guess that you have never done a lab in experimental thermodynamics. There are classical experiment where people measure heat of combustion, heat capacity, equilibrium

Re: Entropy: A Guide for the Perplexed

2012-02-06 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
. If you need help, please just let me know. ———– On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 05.02.2012 17:16 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following: On 24.01.2012 22:56 meekerdb said the following: In thinking about how to answer this I came across an excellent paper by

Re: Information: a basic physical quantity or rather emergence/supervenience phenomenon

2012-02-07 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 06.02.2012 20:42 meekerdb said the following: On 2/6/2012 9:03 AM, 1Z wrote: There is also a "conservation" of information. It is apparently industrictable. Is there? if there is , it is a phsycial law, and AFAIK it is hotly debated. It's the same as the question of wave-function collaps

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >