On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Friedl wrote:
> In case the "no name change" policy is ever dropped, I have a suggestion for
> the new name:
>
> Perfect Image Manipulation Program
>
> It should fix all the problems :)
Indeed! Lets make it one better. Home&Office Perfect Image Manipulation
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Brendan wrote:
> A list of files that would need modification:
>... SINP LONG LIST...
And all of GIMP code. 98% functions are prefixed as gimp. You can try
to grep for gimp on gimp source t
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Stephen Griffiths wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:06 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
>> Some English speakers
>> discomfort at the name is getting a bit ridiculous IMHO.
>
> These words make me squirm.
> fag - a pile of sticks (second
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I wonder why you need both hands on the tablet. The pros that I have
> seen working with GIMP always had one hand on the keyboard and the other
> hand holding the tablet pen. I don't want to offend you in any way, I
> just would like to underst
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 18:49 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>> I wonder why you need both hands on the tablet. The pros that I have
>> seen working with GIMP always had one hand on the keyboard and the other
>> hand holding the tablet pen.
>
> T
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I wonder why you need both hands on the tablet. The pros that I have
> seen working with GIMP always had one hand on the keyboard and the other
> hand holding the tablet pen.
Let me propose a heretic idea that this is perhaps because most comm
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM, wrote:
> Patrick Horgan wrote:
>> One hand on the tablet and the other on the pen doesn't leave a third
>> for the keyboard.
>
> sounds a bit like holding your mouse mat whilst using the mouse to stop
> it sliding around.
Mouse is relative so moving mouse mat is
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 23:54 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> 3. Somehow make GIMP understand that it has to load
>> gimp20-my-pack-of-scripts.mo files.
>
> For a plug-in this is easy. The plug-in would have to make sure that it
> calls
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ismael Barros² wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Design submitting deadline is over, and the designs are ready to get voted.
>
> You can vote here: http://www.freewear.org/?contest=gimp
That does not seem to be the case. For whatever reason I cant select
the design I like. I
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Markus Koskimies wrote:
> There are some missing features, and - umh - interestingly working features
> in GIMp with drawing pad, so I downloaded the sources and I'm going to look,
> if I can correct some things by myself. First question is, of course, do you
> kn
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Olivier wrote:
> Of course! But since I'm writing a book about GIMP, I'm trying to get as
> close as possible to what will be finally published. When speaking about
> documentation, I was thinking to the NEWS file.
Interesting point. When I was merging the dynamic
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Markus Koskimies wrote:
> Hi,
> First a possible bug report: I have Xubuntu (9.10) and Wacom Intuos4 L
> graphics tablet. I have problems with both GIMP and MyPaint dialogs
> (load/save/settings), they frequently "jam" so that they do not accept mouse
> (nor pen) c
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Markus Koskimies wrote:
> I examined a little that "jamming" with mypaint, ..snip X works
> correctly, and both xev
> and xidump receive events normally.
> Since I have a feeling that it is somehow related to GTK, I think that my
> findings holds for gimp (and
On Monday 07 December 2009 06:10:39 Patrick Horgan wrote:
>
> Have you thought of a popup that asks, would you like to do this for all
> tabs?
>
> I'm not deeply wedded to this, but it takes away functionality. You
> would no longer be able to use icons for one's you knew well and text
> for the
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Magnus A. wrote:
> I'd like to implement a feature where I can rotate/tilt the Canvas, draw a
> bit and reset it to it's original orientation quickly. This need to be fast
> and the rotation in itself should not make any permanent/destructive changes
> (should work
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 19:16:57 meetthegimp.org wrote:
> Complete misunderstanding. They want to be able to prove what has been
> done to the image in the processing. As in: "Is this scratch really on
> the object and has been revealed from the raw photo with a contrast
> enhancement or has
On Monday 21 December 2009 20:38:40 Damien de Lemeny-Makedone wrote:
> I use GIMP to draw, and I'm very interested in contributing to the code.
> I can speak C a bit, but never actually programmed anything real in this
> lanuage and have no experience with glib...
no worries, its learnable.
> So,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Thales img wrote:
>> http://thales-img.deviantart.com/art/GIMP-2-8-Mockup-147624738
> Since screens are wider than they are high, moving things to the top or
> bottom of the screen isn't helpful IMHO. That's where I have the least
> space.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> I just anyway and everything just works. I never minimize
> anything except rarely when I need to get to the desktop to a
> thumb drive.
Blessed are the metacity(Gnome window manager) users. The rest of us
folk are cursed. kwin STILL doe
On Saturday 26 December 2009 14:54:20 Vladimir Savic wrote:
> I've talked to kde guys (kwin developers in particular) about this
> specific issue. Their response was very interesting. They have said that
> "wrong" behavior of kwin isn't actually anyone's fault. I'll quote one
> of developers: "Gim
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> In what way exactly does it not treat the window hints right? The spec
> doesn't clearly define what's the right behavior. These hints are just
> hints and there is no well-defined behavior that a window manager should
> implement to deal wit
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> That implies that there would be a main window. But the spec doesn't
> have the notion of a main window that the utility windows belong to.
> Clearly the spec is not suited for what GIMP tries to achieve. But over
> all these years no one has
On Friday 08 January 2010 17:08:58 Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Aurimas Juška wrote:
> > Why not to convert XML's to C code when compiling distribution ? XML's
> > are large and not very fast to parse. This approach would have all the
> > benefits of XML's while developing and would not cause addition
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:21 PM, peter sikking wrote:
> would you not be helped with 2 user presets for the dodge/burn tool,
> which you would choose alternating during using the tool?
>
> so per-tool presets would be the solution for your case
> (and, yes, millions of other cases where users _alw
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Mathias Lindner wrote:
> Hi
>
> Imagine a python-fu plug-in with a GUI that is initialized through the
> register function.
> One of the elements is of the PF_FILE type to select a file.
why not use pygtk and the gtk file chooser?
--
--Alexia
___
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> The biggest problem I have with the current tool preset UI is that
> Save and Restore look almost identical, but Save is destructive.
My biggest problem is that the items in the menus are so damn small
and hard to navigate. All things that pop
On Monday 11 January 2010 22:53:06 Martin Nordholts wrote:
> I have made a schedule for GIMP 2.8 with the main purpose of being a
> tool to help us decide what features to include or exclude.
...snip...
> Right now the schedule can be found at [1]. My proposal is that we
> version control the Open
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 08:18 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>> Personally I would be _encouraged_ to further contribute to GIMP if
>> GIMP had someone working full time.
>
> I think it depends on the person...
>
> On the other hand, I can a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:59 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
>
>> If Gimp aims to be a professional tool, then support for things like
>> decent graphics tablets and extras needs to be there and for it to be
>>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Oh you also proposed to buy one for me or mitch too so we can debug together
> etc
>
> Well I don't think I'll use it very much, it's better to use that money for
> something else
Well, my goal in that was mostly to save debugging time. T
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> As far as I know the tablet that Mitch owns is a Wacom I (with serial
> connection). It's the same model that I sent you last year. These
> tablets were donated by Wacom in 1999 for the first GIMP developer
> conference.
That makes these devic
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:31 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
>
>> That makes these devices 11 years old and they are amazing. The one
>> you sent me works fine, and with little hackery I even managed to make
>> it hot
On Friday 22 January 2010 07:38:46 Owen wrote:
> It has changed.
>
> I now select the Move tool (Move the active layer) to reposition.
>
This drops you out of edit mode for the text layer and getting back to it is a
lot of clicks.I find this a bit bothersome. Also, the move tool is not really
c
2010/1/29 Cristian Secară :
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:24:17 -0500,
> saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
>> (plug-in-the-old-egg 0 1 2)
>> (plug-in-the-slimy-egg 0 1 2)
>
> Worked fine, thank you.
In trunk both of them crashed script-fu console for me.
Cristi, sorry about the spam
On Monday 01 February 2010 21:53:15 Sven Neumann wrote:
> IMO it would be nice to be able to have the name in the tab, besides the
> icon or text-only. It might even be nice to make icon+label the default
> for a dock that hosts just a single dockable.
Some icons carry more information, than just
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Olivier wrote:
> I discovered some weeks ago the new Paint Dynamics feature of version 2.7
> and the git one, but I would like to find some explanations about its use.
> One point which bothers me is that I thought there was some way to control
> the shape of the a
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 22:22:17 LightningIsMyName wrote:
> Can you give some explanations of what is needed? It suprises me that
> there is a problem with a curves widget, when we can "steal" most of
> the code from the existing curves dialog of the curve tool...
> I would like to know some mo
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Laxminarayan Kamath
wrote:
> Something similar here. Using git version. ( max 3 or 4 days old,
> current one is somehow not compiling, trying to see whats choking it)
> . I took the toolbox and kept it at the right edge (size jsut enough
> to keep the tools arrang
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:59 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Alexia Death wrote:
> > AFAIK toolbox size issues are a side effect of the incomplete swm.
>> One of the intersting aspects is that since swm does not restore
>> properly I can be in swm mode on startup and have a toolbox t
As the bug and this post prove, that behavior is not sane. I hope
Peter proposes a sane solution soon.
--
--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Saturday 06 March 2010 14:56:21 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > To me, having the layers dialog scroll to a seemingly random place after
> > deleting a layer is a clear usability problem. A user should not have to
> > worry about what layer that was previously selected when deleting a
> > layer.
>
> Pe
On Sunday 07 March 2010 17:25:36 Olivier wrote:
> 1. What is the difference between Fade Tapering and Fade Tappering, and the
> same question for Velocity Tapering and Tappering?
One is renamed other. I made a typo. Sorry. Since you didn't do "make
uninstall" between updates,you ended up with both
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jay Smith wrote:
> Does anybody other than me think that it would be a useful feature to
> add the ability to reverse the Curves black/white direction?
I find it about a useless as a feature as it gets. Standard curve
direction is black bottom left and white top ri
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Jay Smith wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 04:12 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> Is there some actual scientific standard underlying that? Or just
> majority of programs? Or the programs you have used? Or?
That standard is based on the fact that Ive never seen a cu
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jay Smith wrote:
> You are going to hate this suggestion, but as long as certain browsers
> are causing you a problem, you may have to do "browser sniffing" and
> serve those users different content. In other words, different image
> files get called for different
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Olivier wrote:
> - the new set of parameters that appears when one uses the toolbox seems
> interesting, but I cannot find how to use it;
what parameters?
> - I discovered the wheel column and the flow row in the mapping matrix of
> the Paint Dynamics, but could
I should have a bit of free capacity on my virtual server aswell.
since it looked to be a very simple mediawiki, it shoudnt require
much. Downgrading the database if dump is from a newer version can be
a bit of a pain tho.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On 3/22/10
Hi:)
> The basic behavior of this tool would be:
> - you "put" a closed polygon on the image (not limited to 4 handles)
> - you deform the cage, the image is deformed accordingly
> - user can choice if the pixels can go outside of the cage or not. In the
> normal behavior of the Green Coordinates,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Alexia Death wrote:
> Haven't checked the references - but it sounds like the same UI could
> be used to perform the "Liquid Resize" magic, currently existing as a
> 3rd part
> http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/
>
> It does the trick thatadobe sohowed off in the new photoshop yesterday
> -- it is quite well maintained - I keep the .pt_BR translation for it.
> Give it a try, it is worth it.
Will do, but it only seems to do the rescale part of it, not the
cleanup part it
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 00:11 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>> So far no-one has approached me asking for the tarball that I prepared.
>> Is there really no-one out there who's willing and capable to host this
>> simple Wiki setup?
>
> Like you
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Jenny wrote:
> Here is my draft proposal
> https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ARZjTPkuA386ZGRmY3JteG1fOTRoZmJ4cm1keg&hl=en
> thanks,
> Jenny
No, that was not even in the same ballpark as the idea. Integration
with gimp was said to be optional but the project is fo
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Olivier wrote:
> I think I have the answer, but I don't know why it is such, and whether I
> should file a bug: it depends on the input device mode setting. If the
> tablet mouse is set to GDK_MODE_SCREEN, its wheel no longer works in the
> image, although it work
2010/4/8 Aurimas Juška :
> I believe most users write script-fu scripts to automate commonly
> repeated steps. Therefore, it would be even better to complete action
> framework so that user could record commonly used action sequences and
> play them from GUI.
I think script-fu would be ideal for s
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Bernhard S. wrote:
> what do you think of announcing this build to the gimp community? yes/no?
No, I do not think thats a good idea. Git builds are for developers
and people who are capable of doing at least a patch cycle for a bug
they report to the developer. The
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Cédric Gémy wrote:
>> You can find my build here:
>> http://www.mediafire.com/file/hjwqw1kym4g/gimp-win-08-04-2010.7z
>> Read the README_FIRST!!!.txt file before using this build (seriously, read
>> it!).
>
>
> Installing this one on Linux via Wine result In Text
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Torsten Neuer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. April 2010 02:26:42 schrieb Michael Hansen:
>> And my second question: If this is really the case, will establishing
>> Python support be simplified in future (by embedding native support for
>> Python scripts)? OpenOffi
On Sunday 25 April 2010 17:32:55 Cristian Secară wrote:
> Maybe it could be implemented the way Dia does (at least on Windows):
> if the executable is launched directly, Dia starts like GIMP today,
> i.e. independent toolbar and diagram windows; if the executable is
> launched with the --integrated
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> (1) there should be a View->show/hide image tabs option
This applies to the final image strip design aswell.
> (2) probably the tabs should not be shown in full-screed mode,
>although I suppose one could have a preference for it (sigh)
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> I'm a big fan of open source, but I am also a big fan of interaction
> design and usability. For me it is not only software stability that is
> important, I want things to be pleasant to use as well.
This is understandable and I share the
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Easyword wrote:
> It is like you would have a car without tyres. You have very nice car, but
> you cannot use it. Hopefully, developers would consider this type of problems
> in the future.
And what makes you think they are NOT in fact considered right now?
Here's
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Emil Assarsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should I report bugs in the git versions?
Hi:)
I think with git, I''s best to come to IRC, explain the problem and
then see if you are told to put it on bugzilla or if its something
actively worked on right now and can be fixed right
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> So - maybe we should take this slot to demonstrate thenews in 2.7
> master and GSoC projects?
> Who could do the talk?
If nobody else wants to do it I can do it.
--
--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> Martin Nordholts writes:
>> On 05/14/2010 04:13 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
>> > - GIMP should be easily extensible by the average user: one
>> > click-installation of plug-ins
>> > [...]
>>
>> I agree installation of plug-ins is a pain, but I'm
On Sunday, May 16, 2010 15:01:51 Someone Somebody wrote:
> I think a background removal tool like the one that exists in Office 2010
> will be very useful in GIMP.
>
> Hopefully this is the correct place to post feature requests to.
It might be the place, but request like that is useless. Ive nev
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rob Antonishen
wrote:
> I have looked at some of the previews and devel paint dynamic
> reports/reviews and still have a couple questions.
>
> In amongst all those settings is there any "trace a source layer" as an
> option?
No. and there wont be one in this itera
On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 20:19:03 Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 16:32 +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > At LGM we threw some ideas around for Gimp-Merchandizing.
>
> Since I haven't been at LGM, I have trouble to understand the motivation
> for doing GIMP merchandisin
On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 22:06:37 Michael Schumacher wrote:
> To elaborate on this:
>
> 1. the gimp web site is maintained in the gimp-web module of GNOME's Git
> 2. anyone can pull it from there, change pages and create patches,
> people with Git write access can push them directly
> 3. the gi
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Bear wrote:
> hi,
> I am a newbie on GIMP development. Now I wanna create a new tool. For
> example, I wanna create a Text Tool which as same as GIMP owned.
Did you add your new files into the build system as well?
That aside, any development effort is better sp
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 19:45:06 Michael Grosberg wrote:
> Is there an official guide for compiling the latest development release,
> Gimp 2.7.1, on Linux?
> I have Ubuntu 10.04 but I'm not a programmer, and the installation
> instructions on the gimp.org website are geared towards people who k
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Michael Grosberg
wrote:
> Something to do with GTK maybe?
> Or possibly with Xorg.conf? I did attempt unsuccessfully to install my tablet
> (which is old and apparently no longer supported by LinuxWacom)m but I don't
> think I did any harm to the xorg.conf file, an
On Friday, July 02, 2010 23:24:07 Michael Grosberg wrote:
> Alexia Death gmail.com> writes:
> > Its a known issue at least for me with GTK. Under some obscure
> > conditions GTK stops calling the input callback for non-extended
> > devices, if extended devices are presen
Can you tell me how you use the sample points? I'm interested in your
use cases, to better understand different work flows.
--
--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo
On Friday, July 09, 2010 23:38:53 LightningIsMyName wrote:
> Suggestions:
> 1. Change the default brush dynamics to mimic the default settings in
> 2.6 (Pressure mapped to Opacity, and disabling all the other inputs).
> Simply disabling all the dynamics by default (or more precisely,
> setting them
On Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:51:47 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
> I'll try to explain (maybe I could try to record a short video showing
> my work flow if my description is incomprehensible).
> When I open a photo I look for areas where I know how the color should
> look like. I usually look for neutra
On Sunday, July 11, 2010 13:08:55 you wrote:
> I made some images to show how I use sample points. Image [1] shows
> initial setup and image without any corrections. Screenshot [2] shows
> the image while working on it using curves and sample points. Image
> [3] is the actual result, where I did co
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Andrey Kuklev wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this since I'm pretty new to
> the open source community. However, did anyone ever look into implementing
> the PatchMatch algorithm in GIMP? There's a video on it at
>
>
> http://www.youtube.co
Just so its said first, input stuff is business of GTK. Gimp conjumes what GTK
provides.
On Saturday, July 17, 2010 22:45:07 Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> I, as a user, would like to directly corelate the axis (x motion event!!!)
> to zoom, pan, color, etc! Therefore I say that this needs a coherent
> in
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> GIMP/GTK accounts for the channel's existance, but GIMP does not know what to
> do with a "Wheel" channel, as what GTK identifies it, and can only handle the
> button events to be mapped to mouse-wheel events.
GIT does. Wheel is as mappabl
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> size, we need far more control over generic brushes. Again, look at PS.
Want to buy me a PS license and a Windows license? You still haven't
taken a look at the current development status, have you?
--
--Alexia
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:36 PM, xianghang liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am very interested GIMP and want to join the Gimp project as C
> developer. I am a first-year PhD
> student in computer vision. I would like to start with fixing some
> bugs and then implement new
> features and my final objective i
On Thursday, July 22, 2010 21:04:13 Michael Grosberg wrote:
> What do you think?
I think GIMP IS going places and HAS exciting things happening to it. What we
don't have is resources(skills,time,people) tho write such marketing
materials. PLEASE do volunteer.
___
On Thursday, July 22, 2010 21:32:00 Sven Neumann wrote:
> But this is a matter that should be discussed
> on the gimp-web mailing-list. What we are lacking even more than
> programmers is a capable and thrust-worthy sysadmin to overhaul our web
> services.
That mailing list does not work for me an
2010/7/26 Fredrik Alströmer :
> Consider a button/key which you press, which brings up
> a circle of tools around the mouse pointer, perhaps an inch or two in
> diameter (keeping it animated improves visual coherence, or so I've
> been told, perhaps have them zoom out from under the cursor), move
>
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 03:34:43 Charlie De wrote:
> The broken Color mode was reported 4 years ago! Had the solution been
> implemented natively, it would have been available to view, and would
> likely have evolved. There's every chance that it could now be ported to
> GEGL without the alpha
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Charlie De wrote:
>> Compile & and end-user. Not all en-users compile their version of Gimp.
>> Bumping the version number in XCF and implementing the compatibility would
>>probably be better.
>
>
> Of course. But I had the impression the development cost of suc
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 22:33:56 Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I think an IWarp tool would require mechanisms in GIMP that don't
> exist yet as none of the current tools, even if superficially similar
> (like the smudge tool) requires them.
Doing the iWarp tool in paint tool way was rejected because it
On Sunday, August 01, 2010 11:45:19 Matjaz L. wrote:
> I contacted David Revoy and got a reply. He explained he doesn't feel GIMP
> 2.7 is stable enough for regular production work, which would allow him to
> develop a good default brush set through actual work.
...snip
> It's a sort of a chic
On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 23:04:09 Charlie De wrote:
> > From: Rupert Weber
> >
> > I wrote a patch that might help fix the situation.
>
> Thanks so much for working on this! I'm one of the people who'd greatly
> appreciate the fix. In fact, your effort is more than I dared hope for, I
> wa
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Dave wrote:
> I experienced lag on brush strokes with CPU utilization maxing out at 100% (it
> was always high even with 2.6) but is bad enough that I've reverted back to
> 2.6.10. Single or multi window interface didn't make much difference so I
> suspect the new
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010 22:47:08 Dave wrote:
> I only use the brush tool, mostly with hard round brushes any size
> typically up to about 25 pixel radius, spacing 10. opacity on. no other
> brush dynamics set. Smaller the brush the better the performance is.
Do you use a tablet?
There are re
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 01:27:48 Dave wrote:
> Wow, guys, If you want to use the mailing list that's fine. but lets
> remove the forum front end or make it read only so that we have a
> standard. Don't beat me up over it.
We dont have control over what gimpusers have on their site as its a 3r
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 02:58:56 David Gowers wrote:
>
> [incidentally, 2.7 uses Cairo more for display related things (not for
> rendering brushes IIRC, but of course in order to see the rendered
> brush strokes, the area must be displayed). It's possible that this
> impacts your system si
On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 06:04:36 David Gowers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12 PM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, GSR - FR
> > wrote: GIMP is a jerk (I get
> > cases where I draw a curve and the middle of it gets flattened into a
> > straig
On Sunday, August 22, 2010 16:36:58 pjbw wrote:
> I had been using GIMP 2.6.10 in XP Pro SP2. I have loaded pspi.exe. I
> needed to try a for me, essential *.8bf plugin 'Altostorm Rectilinear
> Panorama Pro v1.3 which works in Photoshop CS2 and Paint Shop Pro 9.02. I
> set the Preferences folder a
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> - programmable brushes without having to create a new brush for every
> instance of work task I want to do (I don't want a gazillion circle brushes
> in my palette!).
> same way the brushes already are, except that for things like circles,
> s
2010/9/13 Mirza :
> Then test should be extended to look
> for collinear lines.
> But principle should be the same, which means that collinear lines will be
> removed from flattened path.
> Mirza.
No. Just... no. XOR needs to die. Badly.
--
--Alexia
> On 09/23/2010 02:00 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>> That basically boils down to "Why is there no GIMP Foundation"? In my
>> sick and screwed imagination the answer would be "Because there is
>> nobody willing to do all the bloody boring daily work required to
>> ensure prosperity of such an o
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Xavier Araque A.|Rendergraf
wrote:
> Greetings to everyone.
>
> I made this video with the intention of applying Vibrance Color in Gimp
Take a look at LASM scrips in GIMP FX-Foundry script set. They may be
a bit cryptic but IMHO the same result can be obtained using
On Sunday, October 03, 2010 04:10:08 Melissa Young wrote:
> Hi,
> I am creating a new image that is 1265 x 1610 pixels. I am making a
> photo collage with 9 different pictures. Earlier today I was able to
> scale the image to 3.66 (width) x 4.66 (height) pixels. I am not able to
> do that anym
101 - 200 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
