On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote:
[...]
Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the
practical level, the problems are:
1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs
Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity...
2) Not enough developers
Michael Schumacher writes:
According to Tor Lillqvist, there was something missing from Pango
1.2.3 and fixed shortly after the release.
BTW, I now made new pre-built pango-1.2.3 Win32 packages on
www.gimp.org/win32/downloads.html, with the missing exports added, so
building GIMP 1.3.x
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Michael Schumacher wrote:
[...]
Thanks. I've succeeded in building GIMP 1.3 on Win32 using these
packages.
Any chance of binaries for testing?
No. There are still to much issues to even think of it - some of them may be
caused by the fact that I'm
On 9 Aug 2003 at 18:35, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
At 8:36 PM +0200 8/9/03, Dave Neary wrote:
Another reason may be that it is difficult to build the development
version because it depends on released versions of some libraries that
are not included yet in the major GNU/Linux distributions
On 11 Aug 2003 at 1:57, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Michael Schumacher writes:
The result of make after creating the libintl.a libiconv.a files:
Creating library file: .libs/libgimpui-1.3.dll.a
.libs/gimpui.o(.text+0x159):gimpui.c: undefined reference to
`gimp_min_colors' .libs/gimpui.o
When compiling current cvs on win32, I get:
../../build/win32/compile-resource winsnap.rc winsnap-win32res.o
/bin/sh: ../../build/win32/compile-resource: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [winsnap-win32res.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/usr/compile/gimp/plug-ins/winsnap'
make:
On 28 Aug 2003 at 20:38, David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
I started writing an announcement for the bug week which is
supposed to happen next week (it could happen the week after,
though). Basically, I realised that I don't know what a bug week
is supposed to be.
So there are some
On 4 Sep 2003 at 18:07, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
See you at The GIMP Bug Week!
If this announcement is supposed to attract users, it should be more specific
about the skills that are required to participate in Bug Week.
Questions like What version of GIMP will I have to test? and I can't
On 5 Sep 2003 at 23:23, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
What do you think, should I perhaps build a fresh Win32 build of GIMP
1.3 for the bug week,
Can't hurt to have this.
and announce it on gimpwin-users? Or will we get
overloaded by non-bugs like problems with installing GIMP 1.3 on
Windows?
On 8 Sep 2003 at 12:21, Branko Collin wrote:
On 8 Sep 2003, at 9:43, Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any chance, BTW, of fixing that weird floating point GTK bug anytime
soon? (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115293) It's a
real stopper for me.
On 10 Sep 2003 at 20:18, Alan Horkan wrote:
While a Screenshot plugin can be useful (easy enough to discover) it was
never what I really what I wanted as a windows user.
Rather I would have much preffered to be able to simply use the built in
Print Scrn (or Alt+Print Scrn to grab just the
Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out of interest, what's wrong with mingw's toolchain? I
never have tried (and never will!) to build GIMP with it, but
it generally copes adequately with the mildly-unix-centric
codebases I throw at it.
I might be wrong since I don't
Hans Breuer wrote:
At 15:32 12.12.03 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out of interest, what's wrong with mingw's toolchain? I
never have tried (and never will!) to build GIMP with it, but
it generally copes adequately with the mildly
Aaron Voisine wrote:
It's been uploaded to ftp.gimp.org/incoming.
I'm not familiar with wiki. Did you mean for me to upload
the application bundle to the wiki? I thought wiki's were
just for blogging and hypertext.
Wikis can be used for (almost) anything. There is no big difference
between
Aaron Voisine wrote:
Okay... I made a tweak to the 2.0pre3 bundle so it
no longer assumes the /etc/fonts directory exits.
If anyone has any suggestions for the website or
the application bundles, let me know.
Why not pre4?
Michael
___
Gimp-developer
Carol Spears wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:15:41PM +0200, Roman Joost wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote:
can someone please make a fair test, just once?
What will be a fair test in your mind?
Branko Collin wrote:
I noticed that http://www.gimp.org has gone 'black', in order to
protest European software patents. A noble cause, for sure, but
should this not have been announced at least, perhaps even debated?
Or did my trigger-happy, spam-seeking delete-finger erase that
message
Markus Triska wrote:
Anyway - people kind of missed the whole point of me sending that to the
list... this person mailed me off-list because he saw me as someone safe
to talk to. That's not a nice way to have things on our mailing list. What
can we do to change that?
As a first step, you could
Markus Triska wrote:
Dear Carol!
this is the part where you get embarrassed about the weird forwarding
and spamming.
I am sorry for the inconvenience that I am causing you all as a new user of
the mailing list (and, indeed, ANY mailing list).
When I answered your mail, I did not know that
William Skaggs wrote:
Hi,
This is an announcement that I've placed in the Gimp PlugIn
Registry a plug-in for viewing and interacting with image
parasites. It can be found in the 2.0 category, under the
name meta-data. I have only tested it in Linux. There is
no obvious reason why it should
Daniel Rogers wrote:
Daniel Rogers wrote:
So, I noticed the resounding silence surrounding this thread. Is anyone
still interested in a foundation? I went into this foundation thing
thinking I had support from the community. I cannot do this all by
myself. The Foundation is about getting
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:00:17PM -0700, Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put it here: http://www.phasevelocity.org/bylaws.doc These bylaws
Woaw, the bylaws for a free software organisation,
J. Grant wrote:
Hi Branko,
Thanks for your reply.
While I love the flexibility the separate windows of the GIMP software
provide. A friend and I think it would be very useful to have a single
window styled layout (as well as the present flexible window position
interface), where all GIMP child
Daniel Rogers wrote:
David Neary wrote:
Are there any people opposed to closer ties with the GNOME
Foundation?
Well, GIMP is not part of GNOME, and this assertion was made repeatedly
over the years. Apart from labeling GIMP more of a GNOME program, I
wouldn't oppose (but I don't count much anyway
Dave Neary wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, this would put the burden of triage on the GIMP developers
who are currently doing that, but it might avoid reporters being
scared away by curt WONTFIX replies.
The reply is NOTGNOME and we
Hi,
as you might (or might not) have noticed, the wiki at
http://wiki.gimp.org is becoming a really useful resource for The GIMP.
There are, however, a few problems that should be looked at.
In short words, these are look, content and configuration.
Look
The wiki just doesn't look like a
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote:
Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager
can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the
binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify
the
Carol Spears wrote:
hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:02:53AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
configure: WARNING: --enable-gimp-console... are you nuts?
***
*** --enable-gimp-console is for crazy hackers only!
*** The build will fail badly in the app/ directory.
*** You have been warned ;)
***
maybe we
Carol Spears wrote:
in the united states, there exists a condition where people are being
educated for a test. teachers that do not teach the content for the
test are removed.
For usability tests? I doubt that this is the case, though it might
explain the usability of the software produced by a
Hi,
just wanted to let you know that I have a working pygimp on my win32
system. To get there, I used:
ActivePython 2.3 from http://www.activestate.net/Products/ActivePython/
PyGTK 2.2.0 from http://www.mapr.ucl.ac.be/~gustin/win32_ports/pygtk.html
In order to get the gimp python module working
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
I like this idea.
Stan, would you mind filling this as a request feature at GIMP bugzilla?
It helps developers keep track of the features wanted, and you will have some
feedback on it each time it is considered, or implemented, by the developers.
http://bugs.gimp.org
/tmp/am4t7.308/traces.m4:1397: /bin/m4: Error matching regular
expression ^ *\(.*\) *$
Use of uninitialized value in split at /bin/automake-1.7 line 5077,
GEN0 line 397.
automake-1.7: no `Makefile.am' found or specified
Googling the m4 error message turns up some chatter from circa
Markus Triska wrote:
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 06:35 pm, Markus Triska wrote:
This is exactly what I want. For this I
#include libgimp/gimpselection_pdb.h and
#include libgimp/gimpedit_pdb.h
Can anybody beat this amount of stupidity? I just found out that these files
are included via
David Neary wrote:
Media Hacks book
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joli,
Joli Ballew wrote:
I am Joli Ballew, coauthor of the upcoming O'Reilly book Windows
Digital Media Hacks. I wrote a hack on GIMP, but my editor would like
it to be beefed up a bit. It needs a hack angle,
David Neary schrieb:
I'm not opposed to having stuff split off, but I am worried about
the stuff getting a bit lost. Most gimp 2.0 installs (the vast
majority, I would say) don't have GAP or the perl bindings
installed. That's not a trend we should be encouraging, IMHO. In
fact, I think we need
Nathan Summers schrieb:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:47:52 -0700, William Skaggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) How do you add fonts in Windows, and what types of fonts can GIMP use
there?
The easiest way is to drag the file onto the Fonts directory and let
the shell do its magic. Unless you've done
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I wrote:
Except that on Windows it's not or, but and. Just starting a GUI
application from a command shell in a console window doesn't make its
stderr and stdout connected.
Iago Rubio writes:
True, but I think my point of view is still valid. No Windoze app opens
David Neary wrote:
Hi Sven
Sven Neumann wrote:
while we are discussing this. Would anyone object if we changed the
default tile cache size from 64MB to 128MB? Memory is becoming cheap
these days and IMO it is reasonable to adapt the default value from
time to time.
I think that's reasonable.
More
Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
More important than a specific default value is IMO that the docs
describe exactly what this setting is for and provide some reasonable
examples for different setups.
Currently, a user can't really figure
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At least it could become part of the gimp docs and be translated -
just like the man pages.
The man pages are translated? Since when?
No, they should be - and it would be good to have them in the docs, as
almost no one seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something seems wrong with autogen.sh for gimp
It doesn't seem to recognize automake 1.8.3 from
mingw.org is newer than 1.6
I think that either the HACKING file should be updated
to say what works or at least to say that it doesn't
work if the problem isn't fixed.
It
William Skaggs wrote:
Since painting a solid or nearly solid rectangle on the bottom
is quite an easy operation, a splash candidate would not necessarily
need to be rejected on this basis. I feel that this is worth mentioning
because several of the most popular candidates have this problem.
If
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Ah, it's worse than I remembered, since the
patch is actually against GIMP 1.2! But I'm
compiling up GIMP 2.0.x now and so hope to have time to
port this to 2.0 today, and from there hopefully it's
only a short hop to 2.1.x (but I can't test that).
Why can't you test 2.1 (or
Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
IMO it is too much of a compromise to even consider a name change.
Discussions like these server only one purpose - artificial creation of a
previously non-existant problem to support the position of the one who
started the
William Skaggs wrote:
Sven wrote:
Let's see. We have GIMP 2.2 done and are preparing to switch to GEGL.
At this point you are trying to propose a kludge? Sorry, but I am not
going to read any further...
Well, the most recent ChangeLog entry for gegl is dated 3-25-04, and
if it is nearly ready to
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does it make sense that gimp, which is free and open depend on a
rather large piece of software that is only open and not free?
The real point here is that, afaik, gtkdoc doesn't actually depend on
Jade any longer. For quite a while the docs
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is possible - I built gtkdoc on Win32 without having Jade installed.
How did you trick the configure script into believing that jade was
available? I had a quick look and it seems to check for openjade or
jade and bails out
William Skaggs wrote:
Sven wrote:
But isn't it accessible from http://wilber.gimp.org/~raphael/metadata/ ?
No, that doesn't exist any more. And I don't think it ever had the
source code anyway -- but I may be wrong about that.
There seems to be at least a bit of source code:
Jordi Cantn wrote:
In fact this is only the very first step. My roadmap is more or less the
following
- Do some cleanup to the code
When trying this plug-in on Win32, I noticed some paths with / in them,
/usr/lib/something. This is platform dependant, there a functions in
glib to build paths
David Neary wrote:
You need libexif installed before exif data will be saved.
Perhaps this dependency will go away with Bill's new stuff, but I
think he uses it too.
Reimplementing libexif in gimp wouldn't be too wise, would it?
Michael
--
The GIMP http://www.gimp.org | IRC:
Nathan Summers wrote:
For a long time the policy was that we used the most recent devel
branch release. When did that change? CVS HEAD is a little too
fast-moving, but I don't have a problem with using the latest devel
version, and I don't remember anyone else having a problem with it,
either.
Where are the current list archives?
http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html
HTH,
Michael
--
Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Andrei Simion wrote:
At gimp.org they don't have downloads for 2.2. If you say it works,
this is good. But why they don't say the same on the web site.
If you're looking for binaries, Fedora Core 3 is listed, which would be
a Red Hat. You can build from source on any Linux distro though.
Andrei Simion wrote:
I haven't downloaded anything from gimp.org so I didn't know the
binaries come from other entities. I haven't intended to be
disrespectful; if so, please accept my apologies.
IMO you should at least have read it carefully...
Some things don't fit here - on the one hand
Ansel Witthaus wrote:
Hello,
I need to obtain approval from you and the people I interview within
the project before I can continue.
Thanks for asking.
There is no one in a position to explicitely give or deny you the
permission to write a paper about The GIMP, though, so if the policy of
Rajesh T.S wrote:
Hi all,
I am very newly introduced to GIMP. now i need to do 2D image rotation
and needs to read pixel values at some specified coordinates.
can anyone guide me in this aspect by pointing to me any simple example
codes written using GIMP libraries ...
First advice:
Campbell Barton wrote:
Hi, Is there a forum where ppl post scripts? - Just wondering if this is
the appropriate spot.
http://registry.gimp.org is the right place for this.
HTH,
Michael
--
The GIMP http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki http://wiki.gimp.org |
Laszlo wrote:
Hi!
I have on windows XP, gimp 2.2.6. If I try to open a .jpg file, the
jpeg.exe has errors and crash. (ofcours I have a bugreport window, if I
want to send a report from this problem to microsoft)
Did you use the current installers from http://gimp-win.sf.net?
HTH;
Michael
I dont know where should I ask for this problem. (so sorry, if I ask at
the wrong place)
The problem is, that for windows there is several GTK installer packages
At the Gimp for windows site:
http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/stable.html
At Tor Lillqvist site:
2005-05-09, h keltezéssel 21:58-kor GSR - FR ezt írta:
Sounds like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300186
I have readed trough the bugreport. And sorry for asking it, that is
already fixed and the solution is in the bugzilla.
The solution is also in the new installer for GIMP
Andrei Simion wrote:
Sorry about that. There is an explanation for this. This mailing list is
set up that when someone sends an email on it, it has the to header
field to the original sender and a cc to the list. Replying to this
message would send one email to the email address in the to
Von: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote:
This is intentional - google for reply to considered harmful.
This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
mailing
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
dialog.c: Dans la fonction « request_url »:
dialog.c:869: error: `O_BINARY' undeclared (first use in this function)
Update your tree again.
This is something that's now inside an #ifdef G_OS_WIN32 - I was
surprised that this constant isn't available on platforms
Simon Budig wrote:
Tor Lillqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
Here we go once again...
I've filled out the form and clarified that they have to adhere to the
GPL. I've also made myself the contact person so that you hopefully
won't get bothered
Von: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto relationship
with GNOME-flavoured GTK, but is there any GIMP equivalent to
OpenOffice's KDE integration (http://kde.openoffice.org/)?
If KDE/Qt and GNOME/GTK+ both adhere to the freedesktop.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 15:23:02, Sven Neumann wrote:
The file dialog is getting better and better with each release.
It's usability will remain severely limited until you need to press Ctrl+L
to actually be able to type-in a relative path (or any path on
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 0:40:37, Sven Neumann wrote:
Perhaps you should stop looking at the dialog and just blindly enter
paths. It works surprisingly well.
Not on Windows, and you still have to confirm your selection twice.
Maybe we can at least turn a part
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
If you mean that I didn't make a separate Perl subhierarchy like
script-fu does (or did), then yes, this I did because I believed
that a user must not be forced to learn the difference between a
C/Script-Fu/python/perl/whatever plug-in. It
Von: Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Don't try to access my A: drive every time a dialog appears.
If I really cared about the A: drive (I don't), I'll probably click
on the icon for it! I heard others complain here that the file
dialogs take FOREVER, since they try to hit
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to get pygimp to work on gimp-2.3.1 for windows/autotools.
For some reason, the pygimp plugin seems not to be initialized.
That's the same problem I have...
Could someone sketch the mechanism by which pygimp is supposed to be
loaded?
It is a
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I meant the following:
Gimp must somehow load the module pygimp, which loads libpython,
which loads the python scripts.
pygimp is a python module. GIMP exectues the python plug-ins, which are run
by python (remember the .interp file?).
You can even check
Von: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guessing here - not being an MS-Windows user - that there is another
EnVar called something like LIBPATH or DLLPATH (or perhaps something
Python-specific) which you need to add the gimp module's path to.
Python-specific - you drop a .pth file into
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It just feels great.
I t always took me sometime when pointing someone to Preferences to go
to Toolbox-FIles-Preferences and not Image-File...
Well, unfortunately this seems to lead back to the Why the heck do I
have to open an image to access $feature?
Von: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 23 June 2005 17:22, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Well, unfortunately this seems to lead back to the Why the heck do
I have to open an image to access $feature? times... and I thought
these were finally gone.
Why so
Von: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ ] Default to last-used instead of source directory
Does it really make sense to make this a preference option? Wouldn't
it be better to add a UI that deals explicitely with processing
batches of images?
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aha! So I edited the Makefile, to add the missing path. and now alt least
I have a dll, although its called 'gimpmodule.dll'... suppose I can just
rename that to gimp.dll...
Didn't get a pth file from autotools...
So what am I supposed to do now?
Write
Simon Budig wrote:
Also we should consider making the layers not selectable in the layers
dialog if they are locked. This removes a source of confusion (why
doesn't this work) and gives immediate additional feedback about the
locking.
I was about to suggest this myself, but then dismissed
lode leroy wrote:
Ah, now it starts up, and the Python-fu is there... yippee!
It should do so now out of the box, at least in current CVS... maybe
except for the interp file, but we should be able to fix this today.
And now lets hope some autotools-wizard can deduce from this mail what
needs
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Sunday 26 June 2005 11:19, Michael Schumacher wrote:
If you want to continue to work on scripting, and get even more
scripting languages to GIMP on the windows plattform, there is
gimp-perl, some java classes, a ruby binding and iirc even
something for Tcl
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The text looks like it's the same size as the rest of the text, so I don't
think it's necessary to increase it any more (I always found GTK+'s
default text size a bit too big, at least on Windows).
gtk-wimp (or is it called ms-theme-engine now?) should take care of
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
some hints and remarks for building gimp-2.3.1+ from cvs
ftruncate is not present in my version of mingw, so I changed it to make
it compile.
Maybe this should be autodetected by configure as
HAVE_WIN32_FTRUNCATE
or maybe glib should provide
Von: Chin2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well i`m wondering if it really difficult to have layer properties in
gimp.
We already have some layer properties - opacity, visibility, link state - so
you should specify what you're talking about...
with all the plugins we have in gimp i think it might be
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at cvs.sf.net, ftruncate is still defined in unistd.h,
but it was added after the release I was using.
Well, they provide updates as well - and installing them is recommended :)
BTW, does anyone know what exactly the MinGwPORT stuff is about? Is it
Von: GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I doubt that makes sense... if it does, why not also make all images
start with some guides? Two guides at 1/3 of size (rule of thirds),
or the middle of each axis (where is the center?), for example. At
least these ones would be visible, not magic.
This
Gottfried Zojer wrote:
1)How is it possible to use GIMP or a plugin from GIMP as preprocessing tool
for something else ( in this case for the PhysX SDK )
Write a GIMP plug-in, have it use the PhysX SDK API and make sure that
it can be compiled an linked.
4)And the bottomline for me is how
Some of you might still remember - or maybe even use - the operating
system of the future that was supposed to free the world from such
things as DOS or Microsoft Windows 3.x.
Despite being a stable and technologically advanced platform, it didn't
succeed - partly because of its equally advanced
Von: michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where is the GIMP Website located (in terms of making changes)? If
someone wants to help e.g. do one page, but not take over the whole
project, how would s/he go about propagating the changes to the GIMP
website (if approved)?
The GNOME CVS, just where
woc wrote:
On 8/24/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only portability issue here is that you'd need to compile it
on all target OS's. No big deal -- that's how GIMP is made
anyways. Use MinGW for Windows, and Linux uses the GCC and related
tools. Easy enough.
Which means
As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
the maintainer of the registry.
Original Message
Subject: Some suggestions for the plug-in registry
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:13:58 +0200
From: Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'd like to propose
Von: Alastair M. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
The lack of Pantone support in GIMP is a useful example of how software
users are harmed by software patents, but to make this claim I need to
be able to point out which patents cause this problem.
Is that really a
michael chang wrote:
Solution: Linux/POSIX emulation layer. Cygwin is usually used.
MinGW/MSYS is also workable, IIRC. I've never compiled GIMP on either,
though.
For GIMP, I'd say that MinGW is preferred - not that there shouldn't any
problems with Cygwin, but anyone trying this might
Axel Wernicke wrote:
Am 23.09.2005 um 23:43 schrieb Michael Schumacher:
Problem: how to keep each of the places distributing GIMP (some net
magazines, other random websites, users) from mistaking it as a new
stable release.
How about writing it with large red letters on the splash screen
michael chang wrote:
On 9/23/05, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael chang wrote:
The problem is that when the timeout dies, then should be a new
version; if there isn't one, it's kinda silly to have to re-install
the same version to extend the timeout.
Reinstalling
Lance Dockins wrote:
1) Is there a way to get python to work on Windows AND is it even
necessary to build GIMP?
Get it from http://www.python.org
It is not neccessary to build GIMP, but neccessary for the PyGimp
modules and thius Python support in GIMP.
2) Where do I install/unzip the all
Nathan Summers wrote:
On 9/28/05, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you do not want sarcasm or even honest requests for good development
style, please post these questions on either the gimp user list or the
gimp on windows user list.
There is no longer a gimp on windows mailing list,
Von: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lode leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.3.4
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:48:10 +0300
lode leroy writes:
In fact, what happens is that when
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, October 3, 2005, 16:49:59, lode leroy wrote:
So the missing dll's in question are a build-environment
issue, and not a gimp-compilation issue...
Just make sure you use the correct import libraries.
It is also possible to create them yourself, from the
William Skaggs wrote:
Before you send a message to this list, please give a moment of thought
to whether the entire GIMP development community really needs to read
what you are writing. If not, how about using private email?
If this is not a general reminder, but directed at certain
Von: Craig M. Houck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have compiled and in some cases re-compiled the following
Why? Are you working with a platform that ships with outdated and/or broken
libs?
Michael
--
Highspeed-Freiheit. Bei GMX supergünstig, z.B. GMX DSL_Cityflat,
DSL-Flatrate für nur 4,99
Chris Share wrote:
I've been doing some reading and it seems that building the GIMP on
Windows is very difficult. This is offputting for newbies like myself
with a limited amount of time. I'd rather spend by time looking at the
code/fixing bugs etc. rather than trying to the thing to build.
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
