[vchkpw] SpamAssassin Y2K10 bug

If you're running SpamAssassin, be aware that it has a rule that's adding points to all mail with a 2010 date. You can fix it by adding the following to your local.cf and restarting spamassassin. score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0.0 See

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

On Jun 17, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Tobias Orlamuende wrote: Seems like Bill is doing quite a lot of work which might make "daily-business-life" easier. :-) Hope he will join this thread. As a side note, I've been approached by a company interested in sponsoring me to add features to vdelivermail th

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Tobias Orlamuende wrote: Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 20:29 schrieb Rick Macdougall: [...] How do you achieve this goal? How do you let your users manage these settings? How is performance when using SA with simscan? Hi, By using --enable-spamc-user=y with simscan and by using MySQL ba

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 20:29 schrieb Rick Macdougall: [...] > >How do you achieve this goal? > >How do you let your users manage these settings? > >How is performance when using SA with simscan? > > Hi, > > By using --enable-spamc-user=y with simscan and by using MySQL based > preferences for sp

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Tobias Orlamuende wrote: Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 19:22 schrieb Rick Macdougall: If you don't need individual settings, the easiest is to just have simscan call spamc. This way, you can reject spam at the SMTP level instead of bouncing it later on. You can still use individual set

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 18:08 schrieb DAve: > Well, not sure if it helps as we currently have less than 10k users on > our system. > > We have two avhosts that run MailScanner, these then send the ClamAV > scanned messages down to our toasters running vpopmail. Milter-ahead is > installed and ve

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 19:22 schrieb Rick Macdougall: > > > > If you don't need individual settings, the easiest is to just have > > simscan call spamc. This way, you can reject spam at the SMTP level > > instead of bouncing it later on. > > You can still use individual settings with simscan c

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 19:09 schrieb Tom Collins: > On Jun 17, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Tobias Orlamuende wrote: > > What are possible implementations of SA on vpopmail? > > > > Currently the cluster counts about 100k mailboxes with an average of ~ > > 10k > > messages an hour. > > Simscan (and clamav)

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Tom Collins wrote: On Jun 17, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Tobias Orlamuende wrote: What are possible implementations of SA on vpopmail? Currently the cluster counts about 100k mailboxes with an average of ~ 10k messages an hour. Simscan (and clamav) is already installed. Users don't have do have indi

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

On Jun 17, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Tobias Orlamuende wrote: What are possible implementations of SA on vpopmail? Currently the cluster counts about 100k mailboxes with an average of ~ 10k messages an hour. Simscan (and clamav) is already installed. Users don't have do have individual settings (would

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Tobias Orlamuende wrote: Hi folks, I wanted to get up-to-date with implementing SA on qmail/vpopmail. I had a look at vpopmail 5.5.1 (because of the SA-support in it), but I currently doesn't compile. Bug-report was sent. What are possible implementations of SA on vpopmail? Currently the clu

[vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail on ISP-cluster

Hi folks, I wanted to get up-to-date with implementing SA on qmail/vpopmail. I had a look at vpopmail 5.5.1 (because of the SA-support in it), but I currently doesn't compile. Bug-report was sent. What are possible implementations of SA on vpopmail? Currently the cluster counts about 100k mailb

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

Dave Goodrich wrote: Ken Jones wrote: "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place. Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line. We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options are site wide. I thin

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

--- > From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 7:19 AM > To: vchkpw@inter7.com > Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin > configuration > > > "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said So let me see

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

Ken Jones wrote: "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place. Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line. We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options are site wide. I think all the user prefere

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

>> This would handle both >> the problem of if the user wants their mail scanned and the disposition >> of the scanned mail. > Yep. If using SQL settings for Spamassassin, the user could also whitelist all senders to avoid spam processing. >> I also think spamc options should >> be stored in the

[vchkpw] spamassassin development was spamassassin configuration

> "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said > So let me see if I can summarize where this might be going. A lot has > been talked about on this topic. > > Use the pw_uid/pw_gid to check and see if a user wants their mail > filtered. I'd also suggest setting another bit for delivery. So we'd

RE: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin spam NOT detected.

Sorry and Thanks a lot . Best Regards. Samir Noshy > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:59 AM > To: vchkpw@inter7.com > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin spam NOT detected. > > this is

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin spam NOT detected.

this is vpopmail mailing list. spamassasin has its own. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists -- Igor

[vchkpw] SpamAssassin spam NOT detected.

Hi Everybody, Do anyone know why that spam not marked as spam ? I know that the score less than the required score that I specified, how can I make the autolearn of this type of messages to be yes not no i.e. (autolearn= "ham", or "spam") ? The Message spam headers: .. .. .. X-Spam-Checker-Ve

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin errors using vpopmail (vuserinfo)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles M. Gerungan wrote: > Hello X-Istence, > > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:40 -0400 X-Istence wrote: > > XI> What i found is that if i give vpopmail a shell (/bin/sh), all works > XI> perfectly and i have no problems what so ever. (This is on FreeBSD

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin errors using vpopmail (vuserinfo)

Hello X-Istence, On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:40 -0400 X-Istence wrote: XI> What i found is that if i give vpopmail a shell (/bin/sh), all works XI> perfectly and i have no problems what so ever. (This is on FreeBSD 4.10) Which makes me wonder. How do you invoke spamd? (I'll show you mine if you'll

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin errors using vpopmail (vuserinfo)

Hello X-Istence, On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:40 -0400 X-Istence wrote: >> What's going on? This appears in my spamd log while processing a single >> message: >> >> 2004-06-22 00:06:14.621893500 clean message (0.8/5.0) for (unknown):89 XI> in 0.5 seconds, 823 bytes. XI> That is what causes it. sinc

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin errors using vpopmail (vuserinfo)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles M. Gerungan wrote: > What's going on? This appears in my spamd log while processing a single > message: > > 2004-06-22 00:06:14.621893500 clean message (0.8/5.0) for (unknown):89 in 0.5 seconds, 823 bytes. That is what causes it. since it does

[vchkpw] spamassassin errors using vpopmail (vuserinfo)

What's going on? This appears in my spamd log while processing a single message: 2004-06-22 00:06:14.075648500 connection from 35119.ds.nac.net [127.0.0.1] at port 1222 2004-06-22 00:06:14.088594500 Unsuccessful stat on filename containing newline at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 1102, line 2. 2004-

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

oops... > log > "v > SPAM" should look like log "***v> SPAM" i.e. it ONE string only... Best Regards, Yuri Nosyrev Russia, Chita

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

> Well it did not work I tried .spam but no luck. Any other suggestion?? try this configuration: import HOST import EXT MAILDIR=/usr/local/vpopmail/domains logfile "$MAILDIR/$HOST/$EXT/maildrop.log" if (/^X-Spam-Flag: *YES/) { log "*

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions... On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 08:42, Remo Mattei wrote: > Hello guys I have a server which does recognize my header (spamassassin > marks SPAM) however it never moves it to the directory called spam here is > the mailfilter

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 08:42, Remo Mattei wrote: > Hello guys I have a server which does recognize my header (spamassassin > marks SPAM) however it never moves it to the directory called spam here is > the mailfilter (which by the way works on a redhat box) this is a SuSE box > and it does not put i

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:42 PM Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions... > Hello guys I have a server which does recognize my header (spamassassin > marks SPAM) however it never moves it to the directory called spam h

[vchkpw] spamassassin + maildrop issue and suggestions...

Hello guys I have a server which does recognize my header (spamassassin marks SPAM) however it never moves it to the directory called spam here is the mailfilter (which by the way works on a redhat box) this is a SuSE box and it does not put it on the spam folder thanks for any suggestions, PS ye

[vchkpw] spamassassin and vpopmail

Hi, i wonder if someone has already making work the subject_rewrite ? i have put it in my conf local.cf but it doesn t seem to care at all, spamassassin is launch like that : /usr/local/bin/spamd -x -u spamd -c -v -m 20 -H /home/spamd -d i wondered if i miss something in vpopmail ? (like users_pr

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin features added to cvs version

Ken wrote: On Sunday 14 March 2004 6:42 pm, X-Istence wrote: -gx enable automatically deleting email marked as spam Do we get to set the limit? Like i prefer to not delete anything over 4, but delete anyting higher than 8. If we delete anything marked as spam, it would delete at level 4, which is

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin features added to cvs version

Ken Jones wrote: I added the spamassasin features to the cvs version today. New configure option: --enable-spamassassin With this option, spamassassin is turned on by default New vmoddomlimits options -gc disable spamassassin for whole domain -gx enable automatically deleting email marked as spa

[vchkpw] spamassassin features added to cvs version

I added the spamassasin features to the cvs version today. New configure option: --enable-spamassassin With this option, spamassassin is turned on by default New vmoddomlimits options -gc disable spamassassin for whole domain -gx enable automatically deleting email marked as spam New vmoduser o

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:53, X-Istence wrote: > >>The BSD code had a hard set limit, with the --enable-spam-threshold=15, > >>which means that anything over 15 would get DELETED, and not just > >>tagged, which is what SA does normally. > > does normally? SA is only used for tagging mail. You

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote: Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote: > Ken Jones wrote: > > On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: > > > >>Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: > >> > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 > shouldn't be better to

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option, if it is n

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:01, Shouguan Lin wrote: > Is it possible not to hard code the header? > CRM114 just like SA can add a header like "X-CRM114-Status: SPAM" for > identified spam emails. If the header is not hard coded, then vpopmail can > work with both SA and CRM114 or other spam filters.

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

al Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 8:26 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish.. > On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: > > Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence m

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: > Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: > > > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 > > > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? > > > > I think this should be made an option, if it i

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: > > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 > > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? > I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for > vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it h

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

Cristiano Deana wrote: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it hard coded, i prefer that as i dont want vdeliverm

[vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? -- Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS "Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche' m$ usava me. ed e' spiacevole" pgp public key: http://freecris.bmm.it/cris.asc in irc su: irc.azzurra.org #freebsd-

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Rob Nelson wrote: > I for one am interested in looking at this. Is there a URL available to > download the plugin? Sure. http://spork.us/dotqmailedit-1.1.tgz There's a brief README, but I highly recommend reading through dotqmailedit.c for more information. In brief, this

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

-Original Message- From: Rob Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule I for one am interested in looking at this. Is there a URL available to download the plugin

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

I for one am interested in looking at this. Is there a URL available to download the plugin? Charles Sprickman wrote: Sorry to be replying late... But, if anyone is interested, we have a squirrelmail plugin and a small C program to handle turning spam-filtering on/off and also for setting vacat

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

Sorry to be replying late... But, if anyone is interested, we have a squirrelmail plugin and a small C program to handle turning spam-filtering on/off and also for setting vacations and forwards from within SquirrelMail. It does not require running your webserver as the vpopmail user. Combined w

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 08:07 am, Tom Walsh wrote: [snip] > > > You can run: > > > > > > cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D > > > > you should be using spamc and not spamassassin. > > > > spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on > > heavily loaded servers. > > Jer

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote: > > > I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? > > > Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for > > > scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ? > > > > I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning > p

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote: > > I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? > > Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for > > scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ? > > I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

> >If anybody is interested in some of the performance tweaks > we have made > >to SA, please let me know. Due to the response I got from this post... I have created a down and dirty SA config page... Please keep in mind these are only configuration tweaks... Not actually changes to the SA soft

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

Hello, qmail-scanner-queue.pl runs spamassassin, razor2, pyzor, clamav, and its own internal scanner, as well as doing rbl lookups, in under 1 second per message, usually about .8 seconds for me. The 10 second delay as someone pointed out is the default timeout for rbl lookups. I had this pro

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

Tom Walsh wrote: I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ? I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our SpamAssassin installation. You can r

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

> I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? > Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for > scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ? I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our SpamAssassin installation. You can run: cat /path/

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

On Monday 26 January 2004 3:22 pm, knom wrote: > Hi people ! > > I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail ! > Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ? > > I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My > Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for

[vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

Hi people ! I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail ! Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ? I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ? My "h

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Saturday 17 January 2004 6:03 pm, Raboo Treed wrote: > is this a feature that will be added to vpopmail permantly?? > > if not now it should be in contrib on the stable i think Yep, it will be added permanently. Ken Jones

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

is this a feature that will be added to vpopmail permantly?? if not now it should be in contrib on the stable i think

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:51 am, Systems Administrator wrote: > And the -c option doesn't seem to be creating .spamassassin dirs inside > their homedirs I found a problem with spamassassin version 2.61 and latest cvs 2.70 Here is a patch that should allow for auto creation of vpopmail .spama

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:51 am, Systems Administrator wrote: > How can I NOT use spamassassin for certain users? > And have user based preferences for spam assassin? vmoduser -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] turns off spam assassin for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm getting the same problem with user dir creati

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

04 11:38 AM To: Systems Administrator; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:23 am, Systems Administrator wrote: > User preferences don't seem to be working, and it seems to be doing > spamassassin system wide

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Thursday 15 January 2004 11:23 am, Systems Administrator wrote: > User preferences don't seem to be working, and it seems to be doing > spamassassin system wide after installing cvs vpopmail and the > spamassassin.patch > > Heres my config: > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf - > required_hits 1

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

in with it. What am I doing wrong?? -Original Message- From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:04 AM To: X-Istence Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule On Thursday 15 January 2004 5:43 am, X-Istence wrote: >

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

On Thursday 15 January 2004 5:43 am, X-Istence wrote: > Raboo Treed wrote: > > what does the patch do exactly?? > > > > calls spamc uppon mailcheck? > > Yes indeed, it forks, and calls spamc, gives it the message, and then > checks the score it returns from SPAMD to then if it is over a set limit >

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

Raboo Treed wrote: what does the patch do exactly?? calls spamc uppon mailcheck? Yes indeed, it forks, and calls spamc, gives it the message, and then checks the score it returns from SPAMD to then if it is over a set limit delete it, or otherwise it tags it and delivers it to the users maildi

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

what does the patch do exactly?? calls spamc uppon mailcheck?

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

Ken Jones wrote: Tom Collins sent me the FreeBSD ports patch with code to enable spamassassin. It pretty much did the whole job except for the pw_gid flags, some configure.in changes and a new vmoduser option to disable spam assassin. So the patch is ready ahead of schedule, whoo hoo! Ken Jones

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

Good deal.. I would like to look at this. -John - Original Message - From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:01 PM Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule > Tom Collins sent m

[vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

Tom Collins sent me the FreeBSD ports patch with code to enable spamassassin. It pretty much did the whole job except for the pw_gid flags, some configure.in changes and a new vmoduser option to disable spam assassin. So the patch is ready ahead of schedule, whoo hoo! I'm running it on our mail

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + qmail + vpopmail + procmail + courier-imapd + squirrelmail + qmail-scanner + clamav

::http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg13511.html ::Where is says [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the above document, use [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Also, I had to change a few things to fet this to work for me, like the ::locations of the binaries, and the X-Spam-Status header name, etc. I also have a

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + qmail + vpopmail + procmail + courier-imapd + squirrelmail + qmail-scanner + clamav

later. Good luck, Alex Martin http://www.rettc.com - Original Message - From: "Vpopmail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + qmail + vpopmail + procmail + courier-imapd + squirr

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + qmail + vpopmail + procmail + courier-imapd + squirrelmail + qmail-scanner + clamav

Warning: may be a red herring: You might want to consider using qmail-scanner to call spamassassin as well as clamav. By default (I think) it puts a "X-Spam-Status: Yes/No" header in the mails, which can be filtered on any client. -- Adam Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vpopmail List wrote: Hello list

[vchkpw] Spamassassin + qmail + vpopmail + procmail + courier-imapd + squirrelmail + qmail-scanner + clamav

Hello list .. I tried the gentoo list with this problem, but no luck .. I have finally taken the shot at trying to get this working .. What is working? Qmail, vpopmail, courier-imapd, qmail-pop3d and squirrelmail, qmail-scanner, clamav(minor problems) this all works ... what I am trying to in

Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

good. If this is so, I am back at modifing qmailadmin. joe - Original Message - From: "Jeff Garvas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:43 AM Subject: RE: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes Joe, Have you con

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

I have a sizable patch from Jeff Hedlund scheduled for the qmailadmin-1.0.21 release that adds very flexible, per-user spamassassin support. I'll (hopefully) announce the release later today, along with information on how it works. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

r SA instead of poking changes into .qmail files. Just my personal opinion. -jeff > -Original Message- > From: Joe Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo chang

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

r.c to check .qmail and > > to write to .qmail. > > > > > > I have set up a anonymous cvs server for this project. > > > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvsroot login > > Use password: cvs > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/c

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

home/cvsroot login Use password: cvs cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvsroot checkout qmailadminspam joe - Original Message - From: "Dave Weiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:45 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAs

Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

rver for this project. cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvsroot login Use password: cvs cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvsroot checkout qmailadminspam joe - Original Message - From: "Dave Weiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday

Re: OT: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling onSpam Score?

On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 18:33, Mark Pearce wrote: > > I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with SpamAssassin into Vpopmail with > > Mysql and Courier. > > > > I'm running SpamAssassin with spam threashold "required_hits" = 8. > > > > I allow direct delivery to the mailbox, but it is subject prefixed

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?

ment [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Dave Richardson - Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:42:33 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on Spam Score? I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with Sp

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?

Hi Peter, On Wed, 28 May 2003 10:26:17 +0200 Peter Palmreuther wrote: > Additionally this would be of much use for you. s/would/wouldn't/ -- Ciao, Pit

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?

Hi Dave, On Tue, 27 May 2003 16:42:33 -0500 Dave Richardson - Lists wrote: > I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with SpamAssassin into Vpopmail with > Mysql and Courier. > > I'm running SpamAssassin with spam threashold "required_hits" = 8. > > I allow direct delivery to the mailbox, but it is s

OT: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?

> I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with SpamAssassin into Vpopmail with > Mysql and Courier. > > I'm running SpamAssassin with spam threashold "required_hits" = 8. > > I allow direct delivery to the mailbox, but it is subject prefixed > "[SPAM]" (thus it is Spam Tagged) > > What I'd like to d

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?

MAIL PROTECTED] > From: Dave Richardson - Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:42:33 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on Spam Score? > > I'm running the QMA

[vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on Spam Score?

I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with SpamAssassin into Vpopmail with Mysql and Courier. I'm running SpamAssassin with spam threashold "required_hits" = 8. I allow direct delivery to the mailbox, but it is subject prefixed "[SPAM]" (thus it is Spam Tagged) What I'd like to do is add another "

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin problem

/www.pipeline.com.au/   -Original Message- From: Paul Theodoropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2003 8:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin problem hey there, this is only peripherally related to vpopmail - only in that i'm running vpop

RE: [vchkpw] spamassassin problem

MAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2003 8:29 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [vchkpw] spamassassin problemhey there, this is only peripherally related to vpopmail - only in that i'm running vpopmail. i'm trying to get spamassasin going. i've used michael bowe's exc

[vchkpw] spamassassin problem

hey there, this is only peripherally related to vpopmail - only in that i'm running vpopmail. i'm trying to get spamassasin going. i've used michael bowe's excellent cookbook, although i'm on solaris and not linux. i've worked around a known syslog bug, and can turn on spamassasin checking with

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin Integration Problem

d the spam option into the alias file too otherwise it > will not work, this has been posted before :) > > Have a good one. > > REMO > > -Original Message- > From: jeffkoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 10:40 AM > To: [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin - scaling

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Rob Gridley wrote: > I realize this topic has been beaten to death, but I've decided to keep on > poking it anyhow. It also might be a little OT. I wasn't able to find > anything in the list archives similar to this, so I decided to post it in > case it's useful to someone. N

[vchkpw] SpamAssassin

I realize this topic has been beaten to death, but I've decided to keep on poking it anyhow. It also might be a little OT. I wasn't able to find anything in the list archives similar to this, so I decided to post it in case it's useful to someone. I needed to have SpamAssassin scan all incoming ma

RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin Integration Problem

You need to add the spam option into the alias file too otherwise it will not work, this has been posted before :) Have a good one. REMO -Original Message- From: jeffkoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin Integration Problem

Hi Jeff, > The problem we have is that spamassassin commands in .qmail-default are > only analyzing emails that are addressed to one of the real pop accounts - > it is not analyzing emails addressed to an alias for either a local or > remote email account. These aliases are handled by qmail-l

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 01:28 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: Hi, I just added my SpamAssassin changes to vpopmail-5.3.19 which is now vpopmail-5.3.20. Where's the patch to 5.3.19? No need to increment the version number, as I'll do that when coordinating with other patches that come in. I co

[vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

Hi, I just added my SpamAssassin changes to vpopmail-5.3.19 which is now vpopmail-5.3.20. I couldn't verify Bill's problem of vdelivermail crashing when spamd wasn't running on FreeBSD 4.7 myself but I'd like to hear from others. Furthermore, even if activated, SpamAssassin will now only be used

Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hello Dave, Hi Gabriel. No need to CC me, I get the list email just as fast :) > > Friday, March 7, 2003, 9:09:17 PM, you wrote: >> The lack of being able to turn it off per user is probably the only >> thing that holds me back from

Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: Mh that one didn't made it to me. Will look into it. In my cases, the fallback worked, tho. Mail just did get delivered without any trouble. I'll test this some more. I briefly compared your changes to the spamc code, and noticed that

  1   2   >