Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:39:45 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to save several images with the same settings, you can
use the buttons Save defaults and Load defaults. We also have
an enhancement request (bug #120829) about providing
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:25:54 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:36:05 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:10:30 -0400, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would Use existing image
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:08:27 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2w=?= Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:22:58 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:44 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Since Friday, I added a new option to the JPEG save
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:44:17 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 07:22:24 +0200, Guillermo Espertino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Gimp, it saves the file directly, without asking for the compression
setting. Result: an image over-compressed with
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:12:03 +0200
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does your reply indicate you take a this feature not a bug
approach here and you think is the best way gimp should deal with
this situation?
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 00:26:21 +0930
From: David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:12:03 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:48:28 +0200
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
What I didn't know (and wouldn't expect) is that Gimp will
destroy my pictures without warning me. And that's exactly what
I get. I have
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:09:05 +0200
From: Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see why providing links to recomended binaries on the front
page would put any more responsibility on us.
We already direct users to recomendeded binaries, and as long as we
continue to be
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:50:02 -0700
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Sabatke wrote:
I've just compiled a plugin based on a denoising program that attracted
slashdot's attention a short while ago. [...]
Jim, there is already a GREYCstoration gimp plugin, which you
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:10:03 -0500
From: Jim Sabatke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:50:02 -0700
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Sabatke wrote:
I've just compiled a plugin based on a denoising program
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is also problems with the way changes broke
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface
with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously
unfinished as far as the print dlg goes yet it seems I still cannot
use gutenprint
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:38:21 +0100
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if you're assuming everyone is using gnome here. I work on
xfce4 and I dont have a screenshot applet or whatever. I have scrot if
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:35:17 +0100
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 02:26 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
On 1/30/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to propose a user interface that fits all needs.
imho, the 2.2 interface met all needs.
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:13:45 +0300
From: Alexandre Prokoudine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/30/07, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
For my part, I've been awfully tempted to port the GTK 1.2 file load
and save dialogs forward to GTK 2.x. I suspect that my limited time
is better spent
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:24:59 +0200
From: Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphaël, this IS exactly my point! Why should the global variables
be prohibited if there is no difference in memory consumption with
local ones, only additional efforts to a programmer to track all
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:33:01 +0100
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 21:10 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Uh, maybe that I didn't look closely enough :-? Here's an updated
patch.
Thanks. I think it's about time that you open a bug report
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:22:20 +0100
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 06:53 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:53:02 +0100
can you explain to me why your patch introduces new
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:53:02 +0100
can you explain to me why your patch introduces new functions in
libgimpcolor? Couldn't you just use the existing gimp_rgb_to_hsl()
and gimp_hsl_to_rgb()?
I did it the way I did to use the same
Unfortunately, there's a little bug in the HSL compose patch, in
gimp_hsl_to_rgb4 in the case of zero saturation. This fixes that.
I'd like to have an option to use luminosity rather than value in
curves and layers; I'm not sure how to do it without introducing
additional complexity.
---
The attached patch (against 2.3.13) adds support for the HSL color
space to compose/decompose. In my experience, HSL is often a better
color space for manipulation than HSV; it better reflects our
perception than HSV. An example is a photo I'm currently working on
of a red leaf backlit against a
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:11:06 +0100
the new function in libgimpcolor needs to be marked as new in
2.4. You can do that by adding Since: GIMP 2.4 as the last line
in the gtk-doc comment. The gtk-doc comment also lacks a
description of what
BTW, I believe I also have to add appropriate lines to gimpcolor.def,
correct?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:11:06 +0100
Hi,
the new function in libgimpcolor needs to be marked as new in 2.4. You
can do that by adding Since: GIMP 2.4 as the last line in the gtk-doc
comment. The
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:18:58 +0100
- Clicking Print seems to get stuck if the printer isn't on when
I click it. The progress bar goes to 100% and then stays
there, and nothing shows up in the print queue. Subsequently
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:35:35 +0100
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:54 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
And a few RFEs which would be needed to get the print dialog to
functionality comparable to the existing gimp-print plug-in.
I don't know whether
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:38:07 +0100
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:02 -0800, Hal V. Engel wrote:
One area were many on the OpenICC list agree is that the
photoshop/proprietary OS approach to CM could be substantially
improved in the area of
I've removed the GIMP 1.2 support from the Gutenprint mainline per
plan. Gutenprint 5.1 and beyond will only support GIMP 2.0 and above.
--
Robert Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:09:44 -0700
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GIMP 2.0 was released on March 23, 2004, and then GIMP 2.2 on
December 19, 2004. This was a 9 month release cycle, which is
quite reasonable. Howver, it has been over a year and a half since
the 2.2
The Gutenprint project is pleased to announce the first public release
of Gutenprint 5.0. This release, which has been under development for
over four years, offers improved quality, greatly enhanced
functionality, and support for many more printers than our previous
version, Gimp-Print 4.2.
Here's a direct download link to the snapshot:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/gimp-print/gutenprint20060703.tar.bz2?download
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:15:38 +0200
From: Till Kamppeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
7) Various minor problems in the PPD files have been fixed. The
most notable change is that the names of the option groups have
been shortened so
I've posted a Gutenprint 5.0 snapshot. Please test it.
I've also cleared up some null pointer references in debug code in the
Ghostscript and CUPS drivers that cause problems on some platforms (I
never caught them because the glibc printf handles null string
pointers gracefully, but someone
Gutenprint 5.0.0-rc3 is the third (and hopefully final) release
candidate for Gutenprint 5.0. It incorporates extensive feedback from
earlier release candidates. In addition to the changes listed below,
it now features a Macintosh OS X Universal Binary.
The release may be found at
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:44:22 -0700
From: Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frédéric writes:
I successfully compiled gimp-cvs under my debian testing, but without
gimp-print support.
What do I need to install to get it ? I can't find any gimp-print-dev or
so
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:32:48 +0200
On Dimanche 16 Avril 2006 19:36, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
The right thing to do here is to build the GIMP without print support,
and then build Gutenprint from source, as Akkana suggests
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:34:45 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CS browser is just one of those flat-file Microsoft thingies.
Why not incorporate a real relational database? So, my
suggestion is to dramatically improve workflow by developing a
MySQL database
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:51:08 -0400
From: Roland Wild [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw your example but i continue to say that the GIMP can be
uncomfortable to use.
In your example http://prokoudine.info/shots/gimp_layout.jpg you don't
have all the funcfionnality offer by the program
From: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:28:22 +0800
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 16:18, Sven Neumann wrote:
The user should never ever have to do this. We need to either
move some of our resource files into a visible folder or we
need to provide a user
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:09:29 +0100
From: Timo Gerke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--050206030204030108080208
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
I just found out that
Welcome to Gutenprint 5.0.0-rc1! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gutenprint, formerly named Gimp-Print, is a suite of printer drivers
that may be used with most common UNIX print spooling systems,
including CUPS, lpr, LPRng, or others. These drivers provide high
quality printing for
From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:34:52 +0100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Roger
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:39:39 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This helps. The GIMP actually includes its own copy of the Print
plugin, but I don't know exactly what source that's based on.
What you might try is using
From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:58:14 +0100
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This helps. The GIMP actually includes its own copy of the Print
plugin, but I don't know exactly what source
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:30:35 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger, Brian has a rather odd problem whereby when he starts the
Print plugin on a fresh image he gets completely empty positioning
boxes (nothing filled in for any of the position/sizing boxes).
I'll
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:19:57 -0700
From: Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:33:56AM -0700, Brian Thomason wrote:
We did that, and the plugin works, but the orientation/position fields
are all empty upon launching it.
FWIW, I fired up Gimp on my
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:42:01 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:19:57 -0700
From: Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:33:56AM -0700
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:12:17 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am packaging up gimp 2.2.8 for Linspire and have noticed some strange
issues in the print dialog that my non-existent C skills have been
unable to resolve.
I'm not the best in the world at
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:28:54 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm the project lead for Gutenprint. Can you describe for me more
specifically what you mean? Why will it fail as it is?
Because there are no values automatically filled in to the Left,
Right, Left
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:30:54 -0400
From: michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/15/05, Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am packaging up gimp 2.2.8 for Linspire and have noticed some strange
When the print dialog is open, the orientation is set to Auto,
which is
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:41:15 -0400
From: michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/15/05, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That shouldn't have any effect here. Gimp-Print doesn't really care
what the underlying spooling system is.
How does it contact the spooling
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:52:33 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
michael chang wrote:
On 8/15/05, Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael chang wrote:
On 8/15/05, Brian Thomason [EMAIL
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:50:14 -0700
From: Brian Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
I've never seen anything like this, with the dimension/positioning
boxes not filled in, even when using the Postscript driver without a
PPD file. Which release of Gimp-Print
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:35:51 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't that at least enough reason to take a closer look at the
issue?
Are you as well starting with this accusation now? We are taking a
close look
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:43:07 -0400
From: Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been contributing suggestions both here and on the
bugzilla.gnome.org bug (whose number I forget). Yes, it's true that
my suggestion boils down to bring back the text entry box! and not a
whole
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:13:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do not disagree with Sven on this. Please do not count me in on
this arguement, I probably should not have commented at all. On
balance the new file chooser is better, it just happens to be worse
So here's a half baked proposal. Make of it what you will. I am
beginning to see why it is quite complicated.
The current file chooser stays the same by default, except that a
label is added somewhere that reads Type a filename or whatever (to
give some kind of visual cue that you can type a
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:12:05 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven, you've been offered a solution -- just add an entry with tab
completion. You may not agree with it, but it's not accurate to say
that noone has made
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:09:06 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
Lots of people have.
Sorry but I haven't seen a detailed and complete proposal yet. If
you can point me to one, please do.
Here's one: add a text
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:18:34 +0200
(3) Don't try to advertise the old GtkFileSelection dialog as being
the solution that we should revert too.
I didn't. I did advertise the way the old file selection dialog used
it's text entry
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:14:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dennis Bjorklund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Marc wrote:
One thing is that people, and _many_ people, just want their location
entry back, for lots of reasons: discoverability, pastability and so
on. But for some
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dennis Bjorklund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ctrl-L popup has lots of problems; not only is it not
apparent how to get to it (there's nothing that points at
ctrl-L), but it's very clumsy to use (you have to type ctrl-L,
type in
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:40:37 +0200
If you want details then exactly as in gtk+-1.0 should suffice,
because that dialog simply worked. No extra window, no slow extra
popups that you have to wait for, no fancy and distracting
_hiliting_,
From: Dr. George W. Oprisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:30:16 +0800
Hello everyone !
I am an old systems engineer, who began on IBM1130's in 71. Started
with Unix Version 7 in 81. Lots of C later C++.
I made my living creating user interfaces with the X11R6
Welcome to Gutenprint 5.0.0-beta4! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gutenprint, formerly named Gimp-Print, is a suite of printer drivers
that may be used with most common UNIX print spooling systems,
including CUPS, lpr, LPRng, or others. These drivers provide high
quality printing
From: Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:03:14 +0100
this is my suggested patch for getting the speeds improvements
as mentioned in the other thread by having a thread-local PRNG
initialized with a seed from the still existing blend tool local
RNG.
It
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:29:52 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We use the same matrix for all color channels, but offset the starting
address for each channel to decorrelate the channels.
Let me know if you're
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:48:03 +0100
Hi,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i am curious to see what changes having gtk+-2.6 bring to poor gimp.
many of the problems with the 2.4 fileselector get shoved off because of
this great
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:57:59 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought it was supposed to allow actually typing in a filename?
The really bad point of the 2.4 file selector is that (at least as
far as I can see
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:19:14 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's terribly obvious :-( If the entry box isn't visible, how is
anyone to know that you can actually do this?
You can do that in all treeviews (at least
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:16:56 +0100
Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have also tried installing GTK 2.4 on SuSE 9.1 without success. I
have not tried 2.6 yet. SuSE 9.1 comes with GTK 2.2.4. Many things
stop working when GTK
BTW, I just dropped a note to James Ogley (maintainer of
usr-local-bin) to see if he has any plans to upgrade his stuff to gtk
2.6.
--
Robert Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:36:29 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There could be plenty of other reasons why, of course. But it isn't
FUD for people to report that they're having problems compiling and
running GTK 2.6
From: Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:17 -0800
I probably should have said that I believed that the problems I
had=20 with GTK 2.4 were likely caused by the RPMs I was using
(user local=20 bin) as I had not tried building it myself. So this
is a SuSE
From: Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:24:30 -0800
--nextPart10261261.yohHSzoVkz
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 03 February 2005 23:27, Tino Schwarze
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:32:15 -0800
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you.
Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I
think that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image
when opening it without marking it
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:32:44 +
From: Alastair M. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Robert,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any
other EXIF-aware viewer or editor?
I doubt anyone who's encountered this issue
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:29:15 -0800
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On loading an exif-jpeg file, it (1) calls
gimp_metadata_store_exif(), and (2) extracts the orientation from
the exif and, if it is not top-left, queries the user whether to
rotate the image.
I know
From: Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:44:41 +0100
On 10.01.2005, at 16:52, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Unless I'm being told untruth about the losslessness (soundss great,
doesn't it?), the metaphor of not messing around with negatives isn't
appropriate.
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:24:49 -0800
From: Akkana Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Neumann writes:
Assuming your camera adds EXIF info, are you seriously telling me
that you do not run 'exiftran -a -i' on each and every image you
ever shoot and instead use GIMP to rotate them?
From: Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:09:29 -0800
You can add me to the list. I also leave my originals alone. As you=20
say this is just good photographic practice. I have negatives that=20
are almost 70 years old that are in nearly new condition that I
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:49:17 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My policy is to never muck with the original -- PERIOD. Yes, I could
always make copies, but that would use more disk space. This is a
standard
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Krawitz wrote:
4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in
pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into
standard alignment. I thought it was
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:53:01 -0800
From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) The jpeg plug-in now pretty closely adheres to the instructions
in the exif specifications concerning which fields should be
altered by an image-editing program. There are a couple of
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:16:37 +1300
From: Jonty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a problem using gimp-print 5.0.0 with gimp 2.2, or is this
a configure problem?
checking for gimpprint-config... /usr/bin/gimpprint-config
checking for GIMP-PRINT - version = 4.2.0...
*** GIMP-PRINT
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be
changed easily, our users will not any longer know what
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06 Sep 2004 17:52:20 +0200
a while ago we decided for a feature freeze for GIMP 2.2 that
should have taken effect last week. I haven't enforced this feature
freeze yet because there's been some good hacking going on recently
and I think
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Beta 2! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-beta2 is the second beta prerelease of Gimp-Print
5.0. It is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for
over two years, and includes many improvements over the very popular
4.2 series.
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09 Aug 2004 12:53:25 +0200
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GIMP has all this already, why would you want to deal with units in
a library such as gimp-print?
Two reasons:
1) Gimp-Print covers
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Aug 2004 02:39:20 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right. The problem is how the application determines whether a
particular parameter is a measurement or just an arbitrary floating
point number. The only piece
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09 Aug 2004 11:15:38 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only API change we're looking at right now is adding
dimension-valued parameters. These are like numerical
parameters, except that programs should present
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09 Aug 2004 00:10:48 +0200
I think it's about time to start to discuss what features we still
want to get into GIMP 2.2. We are targetting a feature freeze by
the end of the month and a release shortly after, so it's probably
about
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Beta 1! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-beta1 is the first beta prerelease of Gimp-Print 5.0.
It is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for over
two years, and includes many improvements over the very popular 4.2
series.
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 30 May 2004 12:44:05 +0200
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, the gtkcurve widget doesn't allow setting the control
points of the curve, only setting a dense curve
(gtk_curve_set_vector). There may
Unfortunately, the gtkcurve widget doesn't allow setting the control
points of the curve, only setting a dense curve
(gtk_curve_set_vector). There may be a back door way of doing it, but
that carries obvious hazards.
There's also no official interface for extracting the control points.
The
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 01:18:30 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:03:36 +0100
Does anyone know how (for the Debian packaging
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 May 2004 11:19:10 +0200
your post (and other mails on the gimp-print-devel list) make me
believe that there isn't much hope for a stable gimp-print API to
appear during the next weeks. Is that right? This means that we
have to change
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 May 2004 10:54:00 +0200
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we do this right, then we can change libgimpprint to our heart's
content and the GIMP plugin will go merrily on its way, without ever
having to be recompiled
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Alpha 3! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-alpha3 is the third alpha release (technology
preview) in the line that will eventually lead to Gimp-Print 5.0. It
is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for two years,
and includes
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
