On Friday 05 February 2016 04:56:53 vitalif wrote:
> >Everyone just rebuild gimp with my patch
> >http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-sav
> >e_export.diff?view=co and be happy
>
> P.S or use prebuilt gimp packages for debian unstable from my repo:
>
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> From: ralf.kest...@gmx.net
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:29:29 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Go to Edit > Preferences > Environment > Saving Images and untip
> "Confirm closing of
Everyone just rebuild gimp with my patch
http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-save_export.diff?view=co
and be happy
>The first part -- prompting you for the export settings -- is actually
>expected to happen the first export per image session. Depending on
>Everyone just rebuild gimp with my patch
>http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-save_export.diff?view=co
>and be happy
P.S or use prebuilt gimp packages for debian unstable from my repo:
http://vmx.yourcmc.ru/var/debian/unstable/ ("deb
Am 05.02.2016 um 05:03 schrieb Richard:
As for the second part, confirm closing of exported-not-saved images,
personally I would prefer this to be a preferences option but I've never seen
any support for the idea expressed by GIMP devs. (Though I haven't exactly
been tracking it, either.)
>Just wanted to add yet another voice to the "really annoyed" list.
>That is all.
I came here and other gimp related sites to try to find some solution to always
asking settings of exporting/saving an image in jpeg format and to bypass the
dialog saying it was unsaved
then i read a lot of the
I adopted the solution proposed by the devs and stopped using it altogether
:o)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:
I like the new save vs export behavior. The only thing I might change if not
already in Gimp in a way in preference to put the export formats i use most
often to the top of the drop down list.
I /hate/ the new Save vs. Export behavior. It is completely
non-intuitive to me, it makes my brain
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
From: mell...@openmailbox.org
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:07:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com writes:
Such as when I'm
downscaling digital photos for uploading to the Internet.
Did
Sorry then. By the way, ImageMagick is a very capable software for image
resizing. More capable then GIMP I beleive. It has 16 bit color depth by
default (and can do even floating point) and a number of high quality
computation algoritms for resampling images to choose from. Sometimes
it's faster
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:47:57 -0500
From: ptilopt...@gmail.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
* Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com [11-03-14 13:27]:
There's only one problem with the current model: I, for one,
would love
Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com writes:
Such as when I'm
downscaling digital photos for uploading to the Internet.
Did you try ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick for that? It's a way faster and
richer in opportunities. And there's no save/export problem. Why live
with a problem that is so easy to
No warranty or guarantee implied, but for people who find themselves
bugged by the Save/Export split, this may be a workable solution.
...And there still exists my patch
http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-save_export.diff?revision=1813view=co
which totally
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
No, and that's why I'm kindly asking you to refrain from emails like
this one in your further contributions to GIMP's mailing lists. Thank
you.
[...]
For the record,
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
From: mell...@openmailbox.org
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:06:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
instead of saving it and posesses the skill of reading
* Richard strata_ran...@hotmail.com [11-03-14 13:27]:
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
From: mell...@openmailbox.org
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:06:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
On 2014/11/02, at 22:22, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
much any part of Earth? :)
Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
No, and
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 3:35 AM, miyuumeow wrote:
So my question to the developers is:
Has there been any futher developments to remedy this issue?
If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
much any part of Earth? :)
Alex
On 2014/11/02, at 22:22, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
much any part of Earth? :)
Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
You seem to be very Gnome-ish in
Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
instead of saving it and posesses the skill of reading could find in the
manual the way to remap the hotleys. No problem to discuss.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
* Melleus mell...@openmailbox.org [11-02-14 09:08]:
Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
instead of saving it and posesses the skill of reading could find in the
manual the way to remap the hotleys. No problem to discuss.
Ability to post email !=
I /hate/ the new Save vs. Export behavior. It is completely
non-intuitive to me, it makes my brain stumble every time I try to do
just about any of the things that I do in GIMP on a regular basis, and
it makes most of my workflows take more thought and more button clicks
I love the Gimp and
* miyuumeow for...@gimpusers.com [11-01-14 20:36]:
I /hate/ the new Save vs. Export behavior. It is completely
non-intuitive to me, it makes my brain stumble every time I try to do
just about any of the things that I do in GIMP on a regular basis, and
it makes most of my workflows take more
Alex,
On 2014-10-10 16:23, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
10 окт. 2014 г. 4:25 chefebe for...@gimpusers.com
написал:
In violation of good forum behavior
I love gimp. I am indebted to the
creators and maintainers.
Thanks, but first offense is still first offence.
OK, is it first offense
In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
export feature. I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6 on it so I
can quickly do simple edits because of this annoyance. I
Oh. My. Fucking. God.
Sent from my iPod
On Oct 9, 2014, at 8:25 PM, chefebe for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
export feature. I even keep an
chefebe wrote on 10/10/14 10:25:
In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
export feature. I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6 on it so
I
can quickly do simple
On 10/09/2014 08:25 PM, chefebe wrote:
I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6 on it so I
can quickly do simple edits because of this annoyance.
I don't believe you. It's as simple as that. Video and independent
testimony, or it didn't happen.
On 10/09/2014 05:38 PM, Bob Long wrote:
chefebe wrote on 10/10/14 10:25:
In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
export feature. I even keep an old Linux system around that has
10 окт. 2014 г. 4:25 chefebe for...@gimpusers.com написал:
In violation of good forum behavior
I love gimp. I am indebted to the
creators and maintainers.
Thanks, but first offense is still first offence.
Alex
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List
On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
Hi
It's a very old story... *Four years ago* Gimp developer Martin
Nordholts explained on his blog:
A lot of
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 02:30:11 +0100
From: for...@gimpusers.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
CC: t...@gimpusers.com
Subject: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote:
On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
Hi
It's a very old story... *Four years ago* Gimp
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Stephen Allen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote:
On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
On 11/04/2013 05:37 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the
code of conduct.
?? - but M still posts?
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List
Replied offlist.
No, he doesn't. His last email was his last.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Burnie West w...@ieee.org wrote:
On 11/04/2013 05:37 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the
code of conduct.
?? - but M still posts?
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
--
dksill (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:02:27PM -0500, Thomas Widlar wrote:
Good.
+1
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:29:29 -0600
From: johnme...@pueblocomputing.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
When did Ted Stryker become part of the development team?
If that's an Airplane reference, I don't get
On 10/12/2013 01:44 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On 12 Oct 2013 19:23, maderios mader...@gmail.com
mailto:mader...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/11/2013 10:20 PM, Melleus wrote:
P.S. If you really prefer accidentally loosing your information you can
surely redefine hot keys.
Hi
This is a
On 12/10/2013 13:23, maderios wrote:
I save at least every milestone, sometimes every step
Surely this backup's the reason why the software works as it does now,
as saving each step would mean saving to the native file format (ie
.xcf) and then exporting to the finished required format ( .png,
Andrew Bridget andrew_brid...@btinternet.com writes:
On 12/10/2013 13:23, maderios wrote:
I save at least every milestone, sometimes every step
Surely this backup's the reason why the software works as it does now,
Bingo!
___
gimp-user-list
On 10/10/2013 12:56 PM, Andrew Bridget wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:17, Helen wrote:
Although I also hate the new feature which restricts what I can do, I
don't
think taking a poll is a useful idea. It seems to me the developers
ought
to be aware, as everyone else is, that this was a bad move,
I work with the tool from its version numbered 2.4. And I use it
primarily as a photo processing tool. I can say that the save/export
feature is a very logical one from my point of view as I can be sure
that I have ALL THE INFORMATION in the SAVED image as long as I can have
only PARTIAL
Although I also hate the new feature which restricts what I can do, I don't
think taking a poll is a useful idea. It seems to me the developers ought
to be aware, as everyone else is, that this was a bad move, that many (who
knows whether most, but certainly many) GIMP users hate it, and just
We are given this software by the we can not demand anything
Of course! And the best of it is that the license is free so you can at least
patch it for yourself [just like I did].
But my idea was that it's generally a good idea to listen to your users even if
you develop an opensource project. )
On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, vitalif wrote:
We are given this software by the we can not demand anything
Of course! And the best of it is that the license is free so you can at least
patch it for yourself [just like I did].
But my idea was that it's generally a good idea to listen to your users
Why don't the haters unsubscribe instead?
Of course because we don't hate the thread in our inbox, we just hate the
feature! :)
Let me repeat it for you: we will *not* make the save/export
separation a configurable option.
Thanks, in fact I've understood your point as early as before I've
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 AM, vitalif wrote:
Why don't the haters unsubscribe instead?
Of course because we don't hate the thread in our inbox, we just hate the
feature! :)
Let me repeat it for you: we will *not* make the save/export
separation a configurable option.
Thanks, in fact I've
Good.
On 10/10/2013 8:54 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
You've just banned yourself from the mailing list. Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership:
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:48:31 +0200
From: for...@gimpusers.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
CC: t...@gimpusers.com
Subject: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Your social skills surely reflect your intelligence level.
Ha-ha. I just say that what I think and don't feel
And in particular, at Please make sure that you add value to the
discussion, avoid repetitive arguments, flamewars, trolling, and
personal attacks.
In this particular case, I think it's the second paragraph that adds some
value...
--
vitalif (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
Hi all,
I don't get it! This discussion is going on for months now, constantly
spamming the mailing list. Still I don't see even the slightest
willingness to compromise on either side. It seems you are carrying out
a war with hardened fronts on the back of GIMP which will give neither
side
Or you could just remap the keyboard shortcuts.
On 10/4/2013 10:45 AM, Eduard Braun wrote:
Hi all,
I don't get it! This discussion is going on for months now, constantly
spamming the mailing list. Still I don't see even the slightest
willingness to compromise on either side. It seems you
Or you could just remap the keyboard shortcuts.
I don't just want to remap the shortcuts. Because (1) sometimes I use the
shortcut and sometimes I use the menu item (and sometimes it's Save as, not
just Save) and (2) I can't save to XCF using the remapped Export. And I
don't like pythonish
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:07 AM, vitalif wrote:
What constructive actions can be applied? I think these are:
1) Just make a configuration setting for enabling/disabling the format
restriction for Save.
2) I think that even disabling the restriction on a permanent basis without
adding any
I want to say two things:
1) The new behaviour is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT. And the authors are just MORONS
because they argue that if you dislike it, you are an idiot, misuse gimp and
should only use MSPAINT because of a low IQ. Just like it was with the
single-window mode, yeah.
2) But - Good
Oops the forum messed up with my diff. So again, either get it from
http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-save_export.diff?view=co
or download as an attachment.
Attachments:
*
* vitalif for...@gimpusers.com [10-03-13 12:41]:
I want to say two things:
1) The new behaviour is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT. And the authors are just MORONS
because they argue that if you dislike it, you are an idiot, misuse gimp and
should only use MSPAINT because of a low IQ. Just like it was
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* vitalif for...@gimpusers.com [10-03-13 12:41]:
I want to say two things:
1) The new behaviour is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT. And the authors are just
MORONS
because they argue that if you dislike it, you are an idiot, misuse gimp
and
Your social skills surely reflect your intelligence level.
Ha-ha. I just say that what I think and don't feel shy about specific words :)
Of course I don't undervalue the incredibly good mission that gimp developers
are performing in general. Nothing personal, of course.
--
vitalif (via
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:03:04 -0700
From: k...@anechoicmedia.com
To: akk...@shallowsky.com
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
I find it oddly unsettling how the developers have consistently turned a
deaf ear to this important
[...] I just copy/paste and
scale as needed but I cannot work on anything else until I anchor it.
Actually you can also click New layer in the layers dalogue to turn the
floating selection into a layer, and then you can work on other things.
Very frustrating when I want to adjust something
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:46:58 +0800
From: ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
To: mader...@gmail.com
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
dozen threads. I believe all of them
* Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com [08-13-13 11:26]:
This single topic has nearly 300 replies by now (if not more), and there
have certainly been dozens of other, smaller topics over time, mostly
clustered around 2.8's launch. It is probably safe to assume there are
over 1,000
Oon-Ee Ng writes:
Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
dozen threads. I believe all of them have your replies in there.
Trying to count the number of complainants, I estimate probably one or
two dozen as well.
In case people are curious: I've been saving posts
On 08/13/2013 07:14 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng writes:
Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
dozen threads. I believe all of them have your replies in there.
Trying to count the number of complainants, I estimate probably one or
two dozen as well.
In case
On 08/13/2013 11:48 AM, maderios wrote:
...Akkana
___
snip That's all I can say
Regards
--
Maderios
Ah-h-hwish it were so
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
I too have been following this thread since it's inception (not as
empirically as Ms Peck though) and see the same exact complaints come up
time and again
I find it oddly unsettling how the developers have consistently turned a
deaf ear to this important issue by not making it possible in the
On 08/11/2013 01:38 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 06:41:50 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
GIMP is the only application I know of where the selection mask is considered
actual document content (rather than an interface entity used for manipulating
document content). That
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
From: jernej|s-gm...@eternallybored.org
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:38:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
In Paint Shop Pro and Excel the selection is also saved with document.
Speaking of Excel, Excel has really weird cut
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:56:22 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Speaking of Excel, Excel has really weird cut-and-paste behavior compared to
every other app I know; the Cut command doesn't actually remove anything from
the document or place it on the clipboard, it just marks it with marching
* Jernej Simončič jernej|s-gm...@eternallybored.org [08-12-13 12:02]:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:56:22 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Speaking of Excel, Excel has really weird cut-and-paste behavior compared
to every other app I know; the Cut command doesn't actually remove anything
from
On 08/11/13 08:41, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation... - load file -
create complicated selection/path to update part of the image -
update that part - export image - quit (and throw the selection
away...).
IMHO the only safe case is when the image has
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:14:20 -0500
From: jnagyjr1...@gmail.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
I had meant to send this on-list yesterday...didn't realize my error
until Richard replied off-list.
Don't forget the 'floating
On 08/10/2013 06:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 11:14 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
[...] I just copy/paste and
scale as needed but I cannot work on anything else until I anchor it.
Actually you can also click New layer in the layers dalogue to turn the
floating selection into a layer, and then you can work on other
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:08 AM, maderios mader...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2013 06:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for
On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation...
- load file
- create complicated selection/path to update part of the image
- update that part
- export image
- quit (and throw the selection away...).
IMHO the only safe case is when the image has one singe layer without
mask, no
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 06:41:50 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
GIMP is the only application I know of where the selection mask is considered
actual document content (rather than an interface entity used for
manipulating document content). That was a very workflow-breaking issue to
come to
On 08/11/2013 03:41 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation...
- load file
- create complicated selection/path to update part of the image
- update that part
- export image
- quit (and throw the selection away...).
IMHO the only safe case is when the
În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a similar behavior in MS Word
2010. I had created a document that I wanted to save as a PDF file.
I used the Save As function to do so. The PDF file got saved and
Adobe Reader was opened
ENOUGH ALREADY - PLEASE give this topic a burial.
Tom
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:07:34 +0300
From: li...@secarica.ro
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
What realy misses here is some intelligent way in determining
On 08/10/2013 03:37 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
I can agree with you here.
If:
- No changes have been made since the last export command, and:
- The current image has no XCF file associated with it
Then IMHO this is a scenario where suppressing the Save changes? prompt can
be quite useful
On 08/10/2013 01:07 AM, Cristian Secară wrote:
În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a similar behavior in MS Word
2010. I had created a document that I wanted to save as a PDF file.
I used the Save As function to do so. The
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the endless discussion of export vs. Save i
On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody, fine. But
pleasing everybody is the same as pleasing nobody.
Sadly not everyone understands the
On 08/10/2013 08:46 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody, fine. But
pleasing everybody is the same as pleasing
On 8/10/2013 1:29 PM, maderios wrote:
On 08/10/2013 08:46 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody,
fine. But
I add my vote on this one.
XCF is a gimp only format, and unfortunately the world don't run on it.
When really working on a pic, this one needs ( by nature ) to be exported and
imported, and sometimes many times in a project. Of course when you draw in
gimp, for gimp and nothing else ( no need to
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
* Yottskry for...@gimpusers.com [08-07-13 15:12]:
[...]
Or that users such as yourself pay someone to develop and provide
software more to their *particular* liking and leave gimp and the gimp
mail lists
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:42 PM, pitibonom wrote:
EDIT: amazing the captcha of this posting window is 'dictatorship' :D a subtle
message ? ;-)
Wait till you get handcuffs or ball and chain :)
so as a conclusion you mean that because it's free, it's allowed to be not
functionnal. Am i wrong ?
Finally am wondering wether there's still a branch of the 2.6 version that is
active ?
Does anyone know ?
Or is there only the standard current 2.8.x trunc ?
Of course for ppl who don't like the 2.8, noone forces them to use it, but then
the question is asked about the older versions.
Is there
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:59 PM, pitibonom wrote:
Finally am wondering wether there's still a branch of the 2.6 version that is
active ?
There's no such thing to the best of my knowledge.
Is there even the possibility to download the old 2.6 somewhere ?
Yes, of course.
Ah it seems yes, but
Wait till you get handcuffs or ball and chain :)
You are.
Because we choose to work on it.
As if we didn't know :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
really amazing Alexandre, the feeling you give me that am speaking to some kind
of deity :D
Mebe in your supreme knowledge and
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, pitibonom wrote:
really amazing Alexandre, the feeling you give me that am speaking to some
kind
of deity :D
Would you like to repent while at that? :)
Mebe in your supreme knowledge and power you could convince other companies
like
unity, adobe,
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the endless discussion of export vs. Save i believe that the second
rule is violated.
s.kortenweg (s.korten...@hccnet.nl) wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me
told that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it
simple and second the user must be happy with the results of your
work.
Compared to 50 years ago there has been a
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
