On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:29:57 -0600
"J. Leslie Turriff" wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2016 04:56:53 vitalif wrote:
> > >Everyone just rebuild gimp with my patch
> > >http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-sav
> > >e_export.diff?view=co and be happy
> >
> > P.S or
On Friday 05 February 2016 04:56:53 vitalif wrote:
> >Everyone just rebuild gimp with my patch
> >http://svn.yourcmc.ru/viewvc.py/vitalif/trunk/scripts/patch-gimp-unite-sav
> >e_export.diff?view=co and be happy
>
> P.S or use prebuilt gimp packages for debian unstable from my repo:
> http://vmx.you
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> From: ralf.kest...@gmx.net
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:29:29 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Go to Edit > Preferences > Environment > Saving Images and untip
> "Confirm closing of uns
Am 05.02.2016 um 05:03 schrieb Richard:
As for the second part, confirm closing of exported-not-saved images,
personally I would prefer this to be a preferences option but I've never seen
any support for the idea expressed by GIMP devs. (Though I haven't exactly
been tracking it, either.)
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:30:23 +0100
> From: for...@gimpusers.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> CC: notificati...@gimpusers.com
> Subject: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> >Just wanted to add yet another voice to the "really annoyed" list.
> >That is all.
>
> I came here
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:30 AM, allthattotell wrote:
> "we need to put it because users are so dumb that we need to protect them by
> this changes" while in reality all users had been doing it this way for years
> without complaining about "unsafe" save/export methods that had to change.
>
> "you
I adopted the solution proposed by the devs and stopped using it altogether
:o)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail
Sorry then. By the way, ImageMagick is a very capable software for image
resizing. More capable then GIMP I beleive. It has 16 bit color depth by
default (and can do even floating point) and a number of high quality
computation algoritms for resampling images to choose from. Sometimes
it's faster t
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> From: mell...@openmailbox.org
> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:07:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Richard writes:
>
> > Such as when I'm
> > downscaling digital photos for uploa
Richard writes:
> Such as when I'm
> downscaling digital photos for uploading to the Internet.
Did you try ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick for that? It's a way faster and
richer in opportunities. And there's no save/export problem. Why live
with a problem that is so easy to eliminate? Completely eli
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:47:57 -0500
> From: ptilopt...@gmail.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> * Richard [11-03-14 13:27]:
> >
>
> There's only one "problem" with the current
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
>
> No, and that's why I'm kindly asking you to refrain from emails like
> this one in your further contributions to GIMP's mailing lists. Thank
> you.
[...]
> For the rec
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On 2014/11/02, at 22:22, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
> If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
> much any part of Earth? :)
>
> Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
No, and
* Richard [11-03-14 13:27]:
> > To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> > From: mell...@openmailbox.org
> > Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:06:54 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
> >
> > Everybody who prefers to lose information when e
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> From: mell...@openmailbox.org
> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 16:06:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
> instead of saving it and
* Melleus [11-02-14 09:08]:
> Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
> instead of saving it and posesses the skill of reading could find in the
> manual the way to remap the hotleys. No problem to discuss.
Ability to post email != Intelligence
--
(paka)Patric
Everybody who prefers to lose information when exporting the work to jpg
instead of saving it and posesses the skill of reading could find in the
manual the way to remap the hotleys. No problem to discuss.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
> On 2014/11/02, at 22:22, Alexandre Prokoudine
> wrote:
>
> If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
> much any part of Earth? :)
Do you really think arrogance and sarcasm helps deescalating the problem?
You seem to be very Gnome-ish in your development: "We have
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 3:35 AM, miyuumeow wrote:
> So my question to the developers is:
> Has there been any futher developments to remedy this issue?
If there were any, wouldn't you be able to see fireworks from pretty
much any part of Earth? :)
Alex
* miyuumeow [11-01-14 20:36]:
> >I /hate/ the new Save vs. Export behavior. It is completely
> >non-intuitive to me, it makes my brain stumble every time I try to do
> >just about any of the things that I do in GIMP on a regular basis, and
> >it makes most of my workflows take more thought and m
> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:40:59 +1100
> From: p...@pricom.com.au
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Alex,
>
>
> On 2014-10-10 16:23, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > 10 окт. 2014 г. 4:25 "
Alex,
On 2014-10-10 16:23, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
10 окт. 2014 г. 4:25 "chefebe"
написал:
In violation of good forum behavior
I love gimp. I am indebted to the
creators and maintainers.
Thanks, but first offense is still first offence.
OK, is it first offense or first offence?
10 окт. 2014 г. 4:25 "chefebe" написал:
>
> In violation of good forum behavior
> I love gimp. I am indebted to the
> creators and maintainers.
Thanks, but first offense is still first offence.
Alex
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gi
On 10/09/2014 05:38 PM, Bob Long wrote:
chefebe wrote on 10/10/14 10:25:
In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
export feature. I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6
On 10/09/2014 08:25 PM, chefebe wrote:
> I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6 on it so I
> can quickly do simple edits because of this annoyance.
I don't believe you. It's as simple as that. Video and independent
testimony, or it didn't happen.
___
chefebe wrote on 10/10/14 10:25:
> In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
> old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
> export feature. I even keep an old Linux system around that has 2.6 on it so
> I
> can quickly do simpl
Oh. My. Fucking. God.
Sent from my iPod
> On Oct 9, 2014, at 8:25 PM, chefebe wrote:
>
> In violation of good forum behavior I am commenting on this eternal, and very
> old thread because that is all I have the bandwidth to do. I also hate the
> export feature. I even keep an old Linux system
Just downloaded GIMP 2.8.8 and while I don't know who did it, a big THANK YOU
for this item on the list:
> Overview of Changes from GIMP 2.8.6 to GIMP 2.8.8
> =
>
> GUI:
> - Add links to jump directly to Save/Export from the
> Export/Save file ext
Replied offlist.
No, he doesn't. His last email was his last.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Burnie West wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 05:37 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>>
>> Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the
>> code of conduct.
>
> ?? - but M still posts?
>
>
On 11/04/2013 05:37 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the
code of conduct.
?? - but M still posts?
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membersh
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Stephen Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
>> >I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
>> >unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a f
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
> >I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
> >unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
> >
> Hi
> It's a "very old" story... *Four years ago
> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 02:30:11 +0100
> From: for...@gimpusers.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> CC: t...@gimpusers.com
> Subject: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
> unsaved work spoils the whole
On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote:
I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save
unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file.
Hi
It's a "very old" story... *Four years ago* Gimp developer Martin
Nordholts explained on his blog:
"A lot of pe
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:02:27PM -0500, Thomas Widlar wrote:
> Good.
>
+1
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:29:29 -0600
> From: johnme...@pueblocomputing.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> When did Ted Stryker become part of the development team?
>
If that's an Airplane
On 10/12/2013 6:56 AM, Andrew & Bridget wrote:
On 12/10/2013 13:23, maderios wrote:
I save at least every milestone, sometimes every step
Surely this backup's the reason why the software works as it does now,
as saving each step would mean saving to the native file format (ie
.xcf) and then ex
Andrew & Bridget writes:
> On 12/10/2013 13:23, maderios wrote:
>> I save at least every milestone, sometimes every step
> Surely this backup's the reason why the software works as it does now,
Bingo!
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:g
On 12/10/2013 13:23, maderios wrote:
I save at least every milestone, sometimes every step
Surely this backup's the reason why the software works as it does now,
as saving each step would mean saving to the native file format (ie
.xcf) and then exporting to the finished required format ( .png,
On 10/12/2013 01:44 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On 12 Oct 2013 19:23, "maderios" mailto:mader...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2013 10:20 PM, Melleus wrote:
>
>> P.S. If you really prefer accidentally loosing your information you can
>> surely redefine hot keys.
>>
> Hi
> This is a false pro
On 10/11/2013 10:20 PM, Melleus wrote:
P.S. If you really prefer accidentally loosing your information you can
surely redefine hot keys.
Hi
This is a false problem. Since last 14 years I've used all versions of
Gimp, I never lost my work. First rule : save it periodically.
--
Maderios
__
I "work with the tool" from its version numbered 2.4. And I use it
primarily as a photo processing tool. I can say that the save/export
feature is a very logical one from my point of view as I can be sure
that I have ALL THE INFORMATION in the SAVED image as long as I can have
only PARTIAL INFORMAT
On 10/10/2013 12:56 PM, Andrew & Bridget wrote:
On 10/10/2013 11:17, Helen wrote:
Although I also hate the new feature which restricts what I can do, I
don't
think taking a poll is a useful idea. It seems to me the developers
ought
to be aware, as everyone else is, that this was a bad move, tha
Good.
On 10/10/2013 8:54 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
You've just banned yourself from the mailing list. Alexandre
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/g
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 AM, vitalif wrote:
>>Why don't the haters unsubscribe instead?
>
> Of course because we don't hate the thread in our inbox, we just hate the
> "feature"! :)
>
>>Let me repeat it for you: we will *not* make the save/export
>>separation a configurable option.
>
> Thanks,
On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, vitalif wrote:
We are given this software by the we can not demand anything
Of course! And the best of it is that the license is free so you can at least
patch it for yourself [just like I did].
But my idea was that it's generally a good idea to listen to your users even
On 10/10/2013 11:17, Helen wrote:
Although I also hate the new feature which restricts what I can do, I don't
think taking a poll is a useful idea. It seems to me the developers ought
to be aware, as everyone else is, that this was a bad move, that many (who
knows whether most, but certainly man
Helen (etter...@gmail.com) wrote:
> If there is a down side to
> allowing users to make this choice, I haven't heard what that is.
Clearly adding the choice option would work against the expressly stated
goal of the change:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification
And no, th
Although I also hate the new feature which restricts what I can do, I don't
think taking a poll is a useful idea. It seems to me the developers ought
to be aware, as everyone else is, that this was a bad move, that many (who
knows whether most, but certainly many) GIMP users hate it, and just allo
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:07 AM, vitalif wrote:
> What constructive actions can be applied? I think these are:
>
> 1) Just make a configuration setting for enabling/disabling the format
> restriction for Save.
>
> 2) I think that even disabling the restriction on a permanent basis without
> adding
Or you could just remap the keyboard shortcuts.
On 10/4/2013 10:45 AM, Eduard Braun wrote:
Hi all,
I don't get it! This discussion is going on for months now, constantly
spamming the mailing list. Still I don't see even the slightest
willingness to compromise on either side. It seems you are
Hi all,
I don't get it! This discussion is going on for months now, constantly
spamming the mailing list. Still I don't see even the slightest
willingness to compromise on either side. It seems you are carrying out
a war with hardened fronts on the back of GIMP which will give neither
side a
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:41 PM, vitalif wrote:
> And I highly suspect that nobody will really listen to these words in any case
> (no matter if I would phrase them like a troll or like an elf).
Oh, we listen all the time. It's the kind of action we take afterwards
that matters. In this particular
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:48:31 +0200
> From: for...@gimpusers.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> CC: t...@gimpusers.com
> Subject: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> >Your social skills surely reflect your intelligence level.
>
> Ha-ha. I just say that what I think and don'
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * vitalif [10-03-13 12:41]:
>> I want to say two things:
>>
>> 1) The new behaviour is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT. And the authors are just
>> MORONS
>> because they argue that if you dislike it, you are an idiot, "misuse" gimp
>> and
>> shou
* vitalif [10-03-13 12:41]:
> I want to say two things:
>
> 1) The new behaviour is a TOTAL PIECE OF SHIT. And the authors are just MORONS
> because they argue that if you dislike it, you are an idiot, "misuse" gimp and
> should only use MSPAINT because of a low IQ. Just like it was with the
> si
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:03:04 -0700
> From: k...@anechoicmedia.com
> To: akk...@shallowsky.com
> CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> I find it oddly unsettling how the developers have consistently turned
I too have been following this thread since it's inception (not as
empirically as Ms Peck though) and see the same exact complaints come up
time and again
I find it oddly unsettling how the developers have consistently turned a
deaf ear to this important issue by not making it possible in the
On 08/13/2013 11:48 AM, maderios wrote:
...Akkana
___
That's all I can say
Regards
--
Maderios
Ah-h-hwish it were so
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
L
On 08/13/2013 07:14 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng writes:
Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
dozen threads. I believe all of them have your replies in there.
Trying to count the number of complainants, I estimate probably one or
two dozen as well.
In case p
Oon-Ee Ng writes:
> Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
> dozen threads. I believe all of them have your replies in there.
> Trying to count the number of complainants, I estimate probably one or
> two dozen as well.
In case people are curious: I've been saving pos
* Richard Gitschlag [08-13-13 11:26]:
>
> This single topic has nearly 300 replies by now (if not more), and there
> have certainly been dozens of other, smaller topics over time, mostly
> clustered around 2.8's launch. It is probably safe to assume there are
> over 1,000 posts on the matter in
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:46:58 +0800
> From: ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
> To: mader...@gmail.com
> CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> Thousands? In all the time I've followed this list I've seen maybe a
>> [...] I just copy/paste and
>> scale as needed but I cannot work on anything else until I anchor it.
>
>Actually you can also click New layer in the layers dalogue to turn the
>floating selection into a layer, and then you can work on other things.
>
>> Very frustrating when I want to adjust som
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:08 AM, maderios wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 06:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
>>
>> On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 11:14 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> [...] I just copy/paste and
> scale as needed but I cannot work on anything else until I anchor it.
Actually you can also click New layer in the layers dalogue to turn the
floating selection into a layer, and then you can work on othe
On 08/10/2013 06:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be h
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:14:20 -0500
> From: jnagyjr1...@gmail.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> I had meant to send this on-list yesterday...didn't realize my error
> until Richard replied off-l
On 08/11/13 08:41, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation... - load file -
create complicated selection/path to update part of the image -
update that part - export image - quit (and throw the selection
away...).
IMHO the only safe case is when the image has on
* Jernej Simončič [08-12-13 12:02]:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:56:22 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
>
> > Speaking of Excel, Excel has really weird cut-and-paste behavior compared
> > to every other app I know; the Cut command doesn't actually remove anything
> > from the document or place it on
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:56:22 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> Speaking of Excel, Excel has really weird cut-and-paste behavior compared to
> every other app I know; the Cut command doesn't actually remove anything from
> the document or place it on the clipboard, it just marks it with marching
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> From: jernej|s-gm...@eternallybored.org
> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:38:04 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> In Paint Shop Pro and Excel the selection is also saved with document.
>
Speaking of Ex
On 08/11/2013 01:38 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 06:41:50 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
GIMP is the only application I know of where the selection mask is considered
actual document content (rather than an interface entity used for manipulating
document content). That was
On 08/11/2013 03:41 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation...
> - load file
> - create complicated selection/path to update part of the image
> - update that part
> - export image
> - quit (and throw the selection away...).
>
> IMHO the only safe case is w
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 06:41:50 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> GIMP is the only application I know of where the selection mask is considered
> actual document content (rather than an interface entity used for
> manipulating document content). That was a very workflow-breaking issue to
> come t
> On the contrary, this is the dangerous situation...
> - load file
> - create complicated selection/path to update part of the image
> - update that part
> - export image
> - quit (and throw the selection away...).
>
> IMHO the only safe case is when the image has one singe layer without
> mask,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:30:10PM -0600, John Meyer wrote:
> On 8/10/2013 1:29 PM, maderios wrote:
> >On 08/10/2013 08:46 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> >>On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
> >>
> >>>And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
> >>>devel
On 8/10/2013 1:29 PM, maderios wrote:
On 08/10/2013 08:46 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody,
fine. But
pleas
On 08/10/2013 08:46 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody, fine. But
pleasing everybody is the same as pleasing nob
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Meyer wrote:
> And I don't know about Enlightenment, but I'm assuming that the main
> developer isn't trying to please everybody. Listen to everybody, fine. But
> pleasing everybody is the same as pleasing nobody.
Sadly not everyone understands the distinct
On 8/10/2013 10:50 AM, maderios wrote:
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the
On 08/09/2013 03:07 PM, s.kortenweg wrote:
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the endless discussion of export vs. Save i
On 08/10/2013 01:07 AM, Cristian Secară wrote:
> În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
>
>> A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a similar behavior in MS Word
>> 2010. I had created a document that I wanted to save as a PDF file.
>> I used the "Save As" function to do
On 08/10/2013 03:37 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
I can agree with you here.
If:
- No changes have been made since the last export command, and:
- The current image has no XCF file associated with it
Then IMHO this is a scenario where suppressing the "Save changes?" prompt can
be quite useful
> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:07:34 +0300
> From: li...@secarica.ro
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
>
> What realy misses here is s
ENOUGH ALREADY - PLEASE give this topic a burial.
Tom
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
În data de Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:41:01 -0700, Tom Williams a scris:
> A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a similar behavior in MS Word
> 2010. I had created a document that I wanted to save as a PDF file.
> I used the "Save As" function to do so. The PDF file got saved and
> Adobe Reader was o
On 08/09/2013 01:30 PM, pbft wrote:
> This thread is like a wound that won't heal - I keep picking the scab even
> though I know I should just let it be.
>
> For me, it seems that there are well-established precedents for this type of
> situation, and in general it would be better to follow pre
Either way, this is a much more civil argument then "you developers are
doodieheads for not doing it my way" aka the way this thread started in
the first place.
On 8/9/2013 1:44 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 08/09/2013 09:09 PM, Daniel wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:02 +0200, Ofnuts wrote:
On 08/
First off, I have been using Gimp ever since 0.9.something, it's still
my most used GNU/Linux desktop application, and I did quite some cursing
the very day the new save/export behaviour was introduced - but mainly
because, in the end, it broke a workflow I was used to.
Am 09.08.2013 21:09, schri
On 08/09/2013 09:09 PM, Daniel wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:02 +0200, Ofnuts wrote:
On 08/09/2013 12:42 PM, pitibonom wrote:
It's quite natural to hope saving a pic in the format it has been loaded. Load a
jpg ? ok, modify it and save it as jpg. Why is it natural ? just because jpg
format (
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:02 +0200, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 12:42 PM, pitibonom wrote:
> > It's quite natural to hope saving a pic in the format it has been loaded.
> > Load a
> > jpg ? ok, modify it and save it as jpg. Why is it natural ? just because jpg
> > format ( though it degrades the
On 08/09/2013 12:42 PM, pitibonom wrote:
It's quite natural to hope saving a pic in the format it has been loaded. Load a
jpg ? ok, modify it and save it as jpg. Why is it natural ? just because jpg
format ( though it degrades the image quality at each save, but this is another
question ) is red
s.kortenweg (s.korten...@hccnet.nl) wrote:
> When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me
> told that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it
> simple and second the user must be happy with the results of your
> work.
Compared to 50 years ago there has been
When i started 50 years ago in the early days of IT as prof was me told
that there are 2 rules for program developers : first keep it simple
and second the user must be happy with the results of your work.
In the endless discussion of export vs. Save i believe that the second
rule is violated.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, pitibonom wrote:
> really amazing Alexandre, the feeling you give me that am speaking to some
> kind
> of deity :D
Would you like to repent while at that? :)
> Mebe in your supreme knowledge and power you could convince other companies
> like
> unity, adobe, mic
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:59 PM, pitibonom wrote:
> Finally am wondering wether there's still a branch of the 2.6 version that is
> active ?
There's no such thing to the best of my knowledge.
> Is there even the possibility to download the old 2.6 somewhere ?
Yes, of course.
> Ah it seems yes, b
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:42 PM, pitibonom wrote:
> EDIT: amazing the captcha of this posting window is 'dictatorship' :D a subtle
> message ? ;-)
Wait till you get "handcuffs" or "ball and chain" :)
> so as a conclusion you mean that because it's free, it's allowed to be not
> functionnal. Am i
PM
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
* Yottskry [08-07-13 15:12]:
[...]
> The best thing that can happen to GIMP now is that the current
> developers all experience some sort of programming-related long term
> memory loss and th
* Yottskry [08-07-13 15:12]:
[...]
> The best thing that can happen to GIMP now is that the current developers all
> experience some sort of programming-related long term memory loss and the
> project can be taken over by people who care about what users think.
Or that users such as yourself pay
1 - 100 of 324 matches
Mail list logo
