[vchkpw] qmail - vpopmail delivery
Hello, Im having some issues, i recently reinstalled qmail and now, im able to send mail, but all mail received goes to /home/user/Maildir instead of vpopmail delivery. Can anyone suggest what files needs to be modified to get delivery back to the vpopmail instad of home directories ? Thanks. !DSPAM:4c23724932714595952374!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation
I've never had any issues with them personally (aside from not liking the concept) but as far as I know neither vpopmail nor qmail have anything to do with delivery confirmation. It's a MUA to MUA thing and the recipient can decide if he wants to confirm he read the message. Your client just needs to check the "confirm delivery" box in outlook. Regards, Tren - Original Message - From: Remo Mattei To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thu Jul 02 21:09:47 2009 Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an email out with outlook. Thanks !DSPAM:4a4d9db232716311574383!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation
I found the patch. Qreceipt is the key. Bye Remo On 7/2/09 10:09 PM, "Remo Mattei" wrote: > Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation > since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an > email out with outlook. > > Thanks > > > > > > > !DSPAM:4a4d9d5932715896620315!
[vchkpw] Qmail-vpopmail and delivery confermation
Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an email out with outlook. Thanks !DSPAM:4a4d849232711256210727!
[vchkpw] Qmail -vpopmail - dovecot IMAP and push option
Hello all, I wonder if anyone has setup a push mail server (iphone, blackberry etc..) with Qmail, vpopmail and Dovecot imap server. Thanks any suggestions are welcomed. Remo !DSPAM:4995f6d132682909899221!
[vchkpw] Qmail/vpopmail with push email OT
Hello guys does anyone of you setup a push email with vpopmail and qmail? If you have done it could you send me the info.. Where to look at. Thanks, Remo !DSPAM:48bb06e032318585112342!
[vchkpw] R: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 toCentOs
Da: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: lunedì 30 aprile 2007 16.25 A: vchkpw@inter7.com Oggetto: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 toCentOs You also need to backup mysql if you use it :) and the assgin and virtual host in qmail otherwise you have to install all the domains with the same username and passwd and then copy over the users' info Ciao, Remo My actual configuration is: qmail, vpopmail, qmailadmin, sqwebmail, isoqlog, mrtg It would be fine not to reinstall everything...
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
Michele are you italian? If you want contact me offline. Ciao, Remo Michele Virgilio wrote: I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on a new CentOs machine. It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can I do? Thanks. Mik !DSPAM:4635c0e8280881357017964!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
You also need to backup mysql if you use it :) and the assgin and virtual host in qmail otherwise you have to install all the domains with the same username and passwd and then copy over the users' info Ciao, Remo Ron Miller wrote: Mik, You want to install vpopmail as usual on the new machine. On the old machine, backup ~vpopmail\domains and restore to the same place on the new machine. -Ron Miller !DSPAM:4635e09a200973360265985!
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
Sorry, hit wrong button... No for the software side, depending on how you have your mail setup, courier or pop3 depends on the mail itself. If it's pop3 you can move it just fine, as long as you setup vpopmail the same as before. If your using courier, you can use a program like imapsync (sourceforge) and sync the mail from old server to new server fairly easly. I'm sure with more info, and more planning on your part you can get this done. Try to determine how your old server was setup, eg. vpopmail, using mysql or cdb for the domains for 1, roaming encryption etc... Joe Joseph Oaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Short answer, NO, libs are different... > >Joe > >Michele Virgilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on >>a >>new CentOs machine. >>It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How >can >>I >>do? >>Thanks. >>Mik >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
Short answer, NO, libs are different... Joe Michele Virgilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on >a >new CentOs machine. >It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can >I >do? >Thanks. >Mik > > > >
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
> -Original Message- > From: Michele Virgilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:04 AM > To: vchkpw@inter7.com > Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to > CentOs > > I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine > on a > new CentOs machine. > It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How > can I > do? > Thanks. > Mik > Mik, You want to install vpopmail as usual on the new machine. On the old machine, backup ~vpopmail\domains and restore to the same place on the new machine. -Ron Miller
[vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to CentOs
I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on a new CentOs machine. It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can I do? Thanks. Mik
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Hi All, Much thanks for all the helpful replies. I have reverted back to courier-imap v3.0.8, and all is now working as expected - open-smtp is being updated properly by both imap and pop3. Again thanks for quick replies and for pointing me in the right direction to resolve this!! Best regards to all. Otto. Rick Widmer wrote: Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote: Hi Micheal, Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? I believe that is correct. Courier no longer provides the IP address needed to authenticate roaming users. Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to them?? SMTP Auth. Have the roaming users login to smtp by adding a user name and password to the outgoing mail server configuration of their browser, and enable that function. (The same one they use to receive mail) Since you are using Bill Shupp's toaster, it should already be installed on your server.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Hi Joshua, Thanks for the reply. The majority of my users are using pop3 - however I have a handful of senior execs that need/want to use imap (this is tied to our webmail & wapmail interfaces). This cutomer was an existing user of qmail/vpopmail/courier (installed in 2003) however we just recently went through a major upgrade. The old system worked quite well (with open-smtp) for both pop3 and imap users. It appears from Micheal Bowe's reply that courier-imap v4.xx no longer supports this (but apparentl;y 3.0.8 does) - so I guess I will need to try and install the older version of courier-imap - unless I can find a diif but easy solution. Rgds. Otto. Joshua Megerman wrote: Hi Micheal, Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to them?? Am I missing something?? The solution is simple - use SMTP-AUTH instead of imap-before-smtp. If they can authenticate via IMAP, using SMTP-AUTH-patched qmail can also use vchkpw to authenticate against the vpopmail database. I understand the desire to make things easy for the users by letting them use imap-before-smtp, but it's really not the best way to do things these days... If you really, truely must use imap-before-smtp, use a different IMAP server. Josh
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Rick Widmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:49:31AM -0700: > > > Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote: > >Hi Micheal, > > > >Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw > >--without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. > > > >If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 > >it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? > > I believe that is correct. Courier no longer provides the IP address > needed to authenticate roaming users. > > >Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's > >the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use > >courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to > >them?? > > SMTP Auth. Have the roaming users login to smtp by adding a user name > and password to the outgoing mail server configuration of their browser, > and enable that function. (The same one they use to receive mail) > > Since you are using Bill Shupp's toaster, it should already be installed > on your server. SMTP Auth is the only way to go...I've tried every other method and they just don't work well. -- ~Allie D. The chief cause of problems is solutions. -- Eric Sevareid
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote: Hi Micheal, Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? I believe that is correct. Courier no longer provides the IP address needed to authenticate roaming users. Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to them?? SMTP Auth. Have the roaming users login to smtp by adding a user name and password to the outgoing mail server configuration of their browser, and enable that function. (The same one they use to receive mail) Since you are using Bill Shupp's toaster, it should already be installed on your server.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
> Hi Micheal, > > Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw > --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. > > If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 > it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? > Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's > the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use > courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to > them?? Am I missing something?? > The solution is simple - use SMTP-AUTH instead of imap-before-smtp. If they can authenticate via IMAP, using SMTP-AUTH-patched qmail can also use vchkpw to authenticate against the vpopmail database. I understand the desire to make things easy for the users by letting them use imap-before-smtp, but it's really not the best way to do things these days... If you really, truely must use imap-before-smtp, use a different IMAP server. Josh -- Joshua Megerman SJGames MIB #5273 - OGRE AI Testing Division You can't win; You can't break even; You can't even quit the game. - Layman's translation of the Laws of Thermodynamics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Hi Micheal, Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference. If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2 it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file?? Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE for any roaming users to send mail?? So what's the solution (if any) - is it possible that ALL users who use courier-imap 4++ are unable to send email and this is acceptable to them?? Am I missing something?? Again thanks for your reply. Best regards. Otto. PS: Does your email imply that I need to downgrade my courier-imap down to v3.x to allow remote users to be able to send mail?? Michael Bowe wrote: IMAP-before-SMTP is possible when using Courier-IMAP v3.x. However it only works when configured "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon". When running --without-authdaemon, Courier-IMAP's authvchkpw code is able to make use of vpopmail's roaming user functions to allow IMAP-before-SMTP functionality. IMAP-before-SMTP is not possible when Courier-IMAP has been complied --with-authdaemon, because in this mode the user's IP address is not made available to the authvchkpw code (via the TCPREMOTEIP env var). Also note that in Courier-IMAP v4.x and later, --without-authdaemon functionality is no longer available thus preventing IMAP-before-SMTP from working. Hope that helps! Michael. - Original Message - From: "Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users] Hi, I used Bill Schupp's Qmail Toaster to install the following: autorespond-2.0.4 - courier-authlib-0.58 - courier-imap-4.1.2 - netqmail-1.05 - toaster-scripts-0.8.1 - ucspi-tcp-0.88 Everything works as expected except for the fact that open-smtp is NOT being updated by courier-imap upon login. Pop3 logins authenticate and update the open-smtp properly. I googled and read practically all the info on this topic, but it seems that nothing I do will get courier-imap to update the open-smtp file!! I did do:: export CFLAGS=-DHAVE_OPEN_SMTP_RELAY ./configure --with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon My tcp.smtp contains: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Have I missed something out? Any ideas or pointers will be welcome. Much thanks and rgds. Otto Rodusek. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 7/02/2007 3:33 PM
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
IMAP-before-SMTP is possible when using Courier-IMAP v3.x. However it only works when configured "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon". When running --without-authdaemon, Courier-IMAP's authvchkpw code is able to make use of vpopmail's roaming user functions to allow IMAP-before-SMTP functionality. IMAP-before-SMTP is not possible when Courier-IMAP has been complied --with-authdaemon, because in this mode the user's IP address is not made available to the authvchkpw code (via the TCPREMOTEIP env var). Also note that in Courier-IMAP v4.x and later, --without-authdaemon functionality is no longer available thus preventing IMAP-before-SMTP from working. Hope that helps! Michael. - Original Message - From: "Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:04 PM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users] Hi, I used Bill Schupp's Qmail Toaster to install the following: autorespond-2.0.4 - courier-authlib-0.58 - courier-imap-4.1.2 - netqmail-1.05 - toaster-scripts-0.8.1 - ucspi-tcp-0.88 Everything works as expected except for the fact that open-smtp is NOT being updated by courier-imap upon login. Pop3 logins authenticate and update the open-smtp properly. I googled and read practically all the info on this topic, but it seems that nothing I do will get courier-imap to update the open-smtp file!! I did do:: export CFLAGS=-DHAVE_OPEN_SMTP_RELAY ./configure --with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon My tcp.smtp contains: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Have I missed something out? Any ideas or pointers will be welcome. Much thanks and rgds. Otto Rodusek. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 7/02/2007 3:33 PM
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users]
Hi, I used Bill Schupp's Qmail Toaster to install the following: autorespond-2.0.4 - courier-authlib-0.58 - courier-imap-4.1.2 - netqmail-1.05 - toaster-scripts-0.8.1 - ucspi-tcp-0.88 Everything works as expected except for the fact that open-smtp is NOT being updated by courier-imap upon login. Pop3 logins authenticate and update the open-smtp properly. I googled and read practically all the info on this topic, but it seems that nothing I do will get courier-imap to update the open-smtp file!! I did do:: export CFLAGS=-DHAVE_OPEN_SMTP_RELAY ./configure --with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon My tcp.smtp contains: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Have I missed something out? Any ideas or pointers will be welcome. Much thanks and rgds. Otto Rodusek.
RE: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users
Your /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file looks fine. Add the following line in your /etc/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" and run qmailctl cdb then try... Regards, Manish Jain (Sr. Engineer - IDC) Hughes Communications India Ltd. Plot-1, Sector-18, Electronic City, Gurgaon. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph. : 91 124 3072681 91 124 3072589 -Original Message- From: Winanjaya - CBN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:38 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users Dear Expert, I need help for setting up qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth with roaming-users I had configured vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users= y option my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run as follow: #!/bin/sh PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin export PATH VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail` VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R -v -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMT PD" -u "$VPOPMAILUID" -g "$VPOPMAILGID" 0 25 qmail-smtpd mail2.lippogeneral.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1 and my /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp below: :allow,RBLSMTPD="",REQUIREAUTH="" why .. I still not able to relay .. see below message: The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.lippogeneral.com', Server: 'mail2.lippogeneral.com', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 553, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 *** Our outgoing mail has been scanned by MSS. ***-***
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users
did u apply the patch to qmail? check shupp.org Remo Winanjaya - CBN wrote: > Dear Expert, > > I need help for setting up qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth with roaming-users > > I had configured vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users= y option > my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run as follow: > > #!/bin/sh > PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin > export PATH > VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail` > VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail` > MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R -v -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c > "$MAXSMT > PD" -u "$VPOPMAILUID" -g "$VPOPMAILGID" 0 25 qmail-smtpd > mail2.lippogeneral.com > /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1 > > and my /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp below: > > :allow,RBLSMTPD="",REQUIREAUTH="" > > why .. I still not able to relay .. see below message: > > The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by > the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject > 'test', Account: 'mail.lippogeneral.com', Server: 'mail2.lippogeneral.com', > Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of > allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 553, > Error Number: 0x800CCC79 > > > *** > Our outgoing mail has been scanned by MSS. > ***-*** > > > !DSPAM:45b5b3dd111671804284693! >
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth for roaming-users
Dear Expert, I need help for setting up qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth with roaming-users I had configured vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users= y option my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run as follow: #!/bin/sh PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin export PATH VPOPMAILUID=`id -u vpopmail` VPOPMAILGID=`id -g vpopmail` MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming` exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -R -v -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMT PD" -u "$VPOPMAILUID" -g "$VPOPMAILGID" 0 25 qmail-smtpd mail2.lippogeneral.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1 and my /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp below: :allow,RBLSMTPD="",REQUIREAUTH="" why .. I still not able to relay .. see below message: The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 'test', Account: 'mail.lippogeneral.com', Server: 'mail2.lippogeneral.com', Protocol: SMTP, Server Response: '553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 553, Error Number: 0x800CCC79 *** Our outgoing mail has been scanned by MSS. ***-***
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail 5.4.13 problem
Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, Are you logging in with [EMAIL PROTECTED] or just postmaster ? Just postmaster. I just tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it works!!! Thank you!!! -- BR! Chris
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail 5.4.13 problem
Krzysiek Włodarczak wrote: Hi! I am sorry for another one post but it can be important: E-mail sent form other domain reached the account on my server properly. Hi, Are you logging in with [EMAIL PROTECTED] or just postmaster ? Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail 5.4.13 problem
Hi! I am sorry for another one post but it can be important: E-mail sent form other domain reached the account on my server properly. -- Best regards! Chris
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail 5.4.13 problem
Krzysiek Włodarczak wrote: The funny thing is I also can not log to the postmaster panel in Qmailadmin. OK, now it's working - bad rights to the domains folder, fixed. Unfortunately authentication via SMTP & POP3 sill doesn't work. -- Best regards! Chris
[vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail 5.4.13 problem
Hello, I have another one problem with qmail installation (last time there ware some mistakes in run scripts - resolved - thanks to Tom Collins). This time I can not log into server. This are my syslog logs: Aug 28 11:19:20 host vpopmail[3787]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found postmaster@:ip.ip.ip.ip Aug 28 11:20:30 host vpopmail[3831]: vchkpw-pop3: vpopmail user not found postmaster@:ip.ip.ip.ip The funny thing is I also can not log to the postmaster panel in Qmailadmin. Of course there is a domain and postmaster account added using vadddoman. Do you have any idea what's wrong? Thanks in advance! -- Best regards! Chris
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Hi, The command #Echo doublebounce >/var/qmail/control/doublebounceto worked. As for the second command #echo # >/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce Nothing happened. I do not know why, but I installed it using #touch .qmail-doublebounce then I put"#" and saved. It is working now. Thank you All. Sam - Original Message - From: "Andrew Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:04 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy Hi, Run the commands: #Echo doublebounce >/var/qmail/control/doublebounceto #echo # >/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce In this way doublebounces will go to the user doublebounce, who's .qmail file has nothing in it and so the mail will fall into a black hole. I think this is what Tom is getting at. Andrew. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 November 2005 14:50 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy Tom you hit it right. My problem is tones of doublebounces of spam from forged return and bad addresses. I do not have doublebounceto file under /var/qmail/control/ How do I set it up and what should be in it, to have doublebounces go to that file instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarding them to postmaster? I will create .qmail-doublebounce and put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce to delete all doublebounces Thanks, Sam - Original Message - From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Sam wrote: @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 20947 uid 501 Looks like doublebounce messages. What do you have in /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto? I've set my server to have "doublebounce" in that file, and then put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce. That way doublebounces are just deleted -- 99.9% of them are crap and not worth looking at (e.g., spam from forged return addresses). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. allpay.net Limited, Fortis et Fides, Whitestone Business Park, Whitestone, Hereford, HR1 3SE. Telephone: 0870 243 3434, Fax: 0870 243 6041. Website: www.allpay.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
On Thursday 03 November 2005 07:38 pm, Sam wrote: > >> I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and > >> before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail > >> under /home/user/Maildir. > > > >what do your logs say about this? (Hint: if you had some of those messages > >you > >recently deleted around, they would certainly help ;) > > The directory was /home/user/Maildir/new was full of thousands of > messages in this format: > 12345678999.16207.qmail ,S=14766 yea, that's how qmail formats the filename, that is not helpful. > When I tried to go in the directory to read one of the messages, the > computer would hang. > That is why I decided to delete the directory. > Now my qmail log shows: > "@4000436ab0a416ec08cc new msg 116203 > > @4000436ab0a416ee27c4 info msg 116203: bytes 2061 from <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> qp 20944 > uid 507 > @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> qp 20947 > uid 501 those are double bounces, you can tell because of ther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> envelope sender. > I do not know what the messages are about and where they are going . > /var/spool/mail has nothing in it. > Under vpopmail I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The qmail.domain.com is the local machine > > >> It took the system more than one hour to delete the > >> /home/user/Maildir/new > >> directory and /home/user/Maildir/tmp and left /home/user/Maildir/cur. > >> Now the server is working fine, but qmail did not recreate the "new" and > >> "tmp" directories again. > > > >it's not supposed to. > >-Jeremy > > Ok, but why qmail was writing to that directory? > Thank you All for your help. > Sam because double bounces get delivered to postmaster by default. If your 'defaultdomain' (which defaults to the contents of the 'me' file) is in locals, it delivers to there. My guess is you have, in ~alias/.qmail-postmaster, a line like &user, and &user has a maildir. Please show us the full, *unedited* output of qmail-showctl and we can assist you further. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. pgp7clxlvKZtD.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Hi, Run the commands: #Echo doublebounce >/var/qmail/control/doublebounceto #echo # >/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce In this way doublebounces will go to the user doublebounce, who's .qmail file has nothing in it and so the mail will fall into a black hole. I think this is what Tom is getting at. Andrew. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 November 2005 14:50 To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy Tom you hit it right. My problem is tones of doublebounces of spam from forged return and bad addresses. I do not have doublebounceto file under /var/qmail/control/ How do I set it up and what should be in it, to have doublebounces go to that file instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarding them to postmaster? I will create .qmail-doublebounce and put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce to delete all doublebounces Thanks, Sam - Original Message - From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy > On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Sam wrote: >> @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL >> PROTECTED]> qp >> 20947 uid 501 > > Looks like doublebounce messages. What do you have in > /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto? > > I've set my server to have "doublebounce" in that file, and then put "#" > in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce. That way doublebounces are just > deleted -- 99.9% of them are crap and not worth looking at (e.g., spam > from forged return addresses). > > -- > Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ > You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. allpay.net Limited, Fortis et Fides, Whitestone Business Park, Whitestone, Hereford, HR1 3SE. Telephone: 0870 243 3434, Fax: 0870 243 6041. Website: www.allpay.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Tom you hit it right. My problem is tones of doublebounces of spam from forged return and bad addresses. I do not have doublebounceto file under /var/qmail/control/ How do I set it up and what should be in it, to have doublebounces go to that file instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarding them to postmaster? I will create .qmail-doublebounce and put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce to delete all doublebounces Thanks, Sam - Original Message - From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Sam wrote: @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 20947 uid 501 Looks like doublebounce messages. What do you have in /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto? I've set my server to have "doublebounce" in that file, and then put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce. That way doublebounces are just deleted -- 99.9% of them are crap and not worth looking at (e.g., spam from forged return addresses). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Sam wrote: @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 20947 uid 501 Looks like doublebounce messages. What do you have in /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto? I've set my server to have "doublebounce" in that file, and then put "#" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce. That way doublebounces are just deleted -- 99.9% of them are crap and not worth looking at (e.g., spam from forged return addresses). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail under /home/user/Maildir. what do your logs say about this? (Hint: if you had some of those messages you recently deleted around, they would certainly help ;) The directory was /home/user/Maildir/new was full of thousands of messages in this format: 12345678999.16207.qmail ,S=14766 When I tried to go in the directory to read one of the messages, the computer would hang. That is why I decided to delete the directory. Now my qmail log shows: "@4000436ab0a416ec08cc new msg 116203 @4000436ab0a416ee27c4 info msg 116203: bytes 2061 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 20944 uid 507 @4000436ab0a41733b08c starting delivery 194354: msg 116203 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @4000436ab0a41734fc94 status: local 1/10 remote 14/20 @4000436ab0a417e397cc new msg 116176 @4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 20947 uid 501 @4000436ab0a41821c9ac starting delivery 194355: msg 116176 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @4000436ab0a418232554 status: local 2/10 remote 14/20 @4000436ab0a41824e68c delivery 194354: success: did_0+1+0/qp_20947/ @4000436ab0a418278a54 status: local 1/10 remote 14/20 @4000436ab0a4182a7854 end msg 116203" I do not know what the messages are about and where they are going . /var/spool/mail has nothing in it. Under vpopmail I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] The qmail.domain.com is the local machine It took the system more than one hour to delete the /home/user/Maildir/new directory and /home/user/Maildir/tmp and left /home/user/Maildir/cur. Now the server is working fine, but qmail did not recreate the "new" and "tmp" directories again. it's not supposed to. -Jeremy Ok, but why qmail was writing to that directory? Thank you All for your help. Sam - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Kitchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:31 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 06:37 pm, Sam wrote: > Remo, > > I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and > before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail under > /home/user/Maildir. what do your logs say about this? (Hint: if you had some of those messages you recently deleted around, they would certainly help ;) > It took the system more than one hour to delete the /home/user/Maildir/new > directory and /home/user/Maildir/tmp and left /home/user/Maildir/cur. > Now the server is working fine, but qmail did not recreate the "new" and > "tmp" directories again. it's not supposed to. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob. pgp2NqVVS2oE5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Remo, I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail under /home/user/Maildir. It took the system more than one hour to delete the /home/user/Maildir/new directory and /home/user/Maildir/tmp and left /home/user/Maildir/cur. Now the server is working fine, but qmail did not recreate the "new" and "tmp" directories again. Vpopmail and the domain accounts that I am using are installed under /home/vpopmail. Any ideas why and what qmail was doing? Thanks, Sam - Original Message - From: "Remo Mattei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy did u check your kernel? there are some hackers that may exploit your server check your /tmp directory if you are also running apache and see if you see some hidden directories, etc.. just my 2 cents. Remo - Original Message - From: Sam To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 18:01 Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy Hi, We have vpopmail version 5.2.1 with qmail 1.03 + mysql 3.23 on Redhat 7.3. It was running fine for the past 3 years until now. Lately the server at random gets slow and very busy and could not be accessed until restarted with a hard reset. The only thing I can think of is rebuilding the system. Any ideas as to why this is happening? Thanks, Sam
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
did u check your kernel? there are some hackers that may exploit your server check your /tmp directory if you are also running apache and see if you see some hidden directories, etc.. just my 2 cents. Remo - Original Message - From: Sam To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 18:01 Subject: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy Hi, We have vpopmail version 5.2.1 with qmail 1.03 + mysql 3.23 on Redhat 7.3. It was running fine for the past 3 years until now. Lately the server at random gets slow and very busy and could not be accessed until restarted with a hard reset. The only thing I can think of is rebuilding the system. Any ideas as to why this is happening? Thanks, Sam
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Hi, We have vpopmail version 5.2.1 with qmail 1.03 + mysql 3.23 on Redhat 7.3. It was running fine for the past 3 years until now. Lately the server at random gets slow and very busy and could not be accessed until restarted with a hard reset. The only thing I can think of is rebuilding the system. Any ideas as to why this is happening? Thanks, Sam
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
I did that, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thats the error I get, I'm missing something cuz even removing the patch its not storing email somehow. Even tho the mx isn't setup, I do it locally, telnet localhost 25 (which has to my knowledge everything I need to do email) it accepts it, but I dont show it coming up in my new folder under home/vpopmailMaildir. I'm missing something somewhere, lol I may just end up removing everything and just starting anew. Migrating is such a pain most of the time. Its not like I have thousands accounts, its like 5 or 6 max. I haven't actually checked but its not alot. Perhaps I didn't do the mysql migration properly. But I do a select * from vpopmail and it lists all the accounts exactly the same as the primary. Idont get errors adding email accounts either so I'm at a lost. -doug > At 06.08 11/09/2005, you wrote: >>Ok I did run the test like you said, I loged in as root stoped qmail and >>ran /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd manually >> >>and I still get the error >> >>511 sorry, you must specify a domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser). > > Well, it means you are using a recipients without specifying a domain. > It's a chkuser setting, that you may exclude if you don't like. > Better you specify a default domain within vpopmail. > > Anyway, why don't you try a normal complete address like > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Tonino > >>Per my previous conversation I did compile UID and GID switching, an >> below >>you can see I changed the bit so that it can do this, however; even as >>root it still doesn't work and I think I'm going to be forced to remove >>the patch and just go about business like usual. Thanks for all the help >>tho. >> >>-doug >> >> > At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote: >> >>Greetings, >> >> >> >> I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I >> have >> >>copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the >> >>new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving >> any >> >>errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts >> >>without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent >> localhost >> >>25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using >> default >> >>chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug >> stderr. >> >> >> >>Heres my run command. I am using my mysql patch for tcpserver so you >> wont >> >>see the /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp file. This works PERFECTLY >> without >> >>chkuser. Before -u was 92 and -g was 91. its not set to vpopmail >> > >> > As chkuser reads qmail/vpopmail control files, if it runs as non >> > privileged user it will never be able to read any control file. >> > >> > You must be sure the running UID/GID may read files. >> > >> > If you log as root and run ./qmail-smtpd directly, you can enter the >> > same commands as you did telnetting, but chkuser will act as root and >> > will read everything. If it works, it means you must use appropriated >> > UID/GID. >> > >> > If you have multiple users, then you must use root as uid (using uid >> > switching for additional security if you are not using TLS). >> > >> > Tonino >> > >> >>#!/bin/sh >> >>export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" >> >>exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -S -u98 -g98 -v -c100 0 smtp >> >>/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd >> 2> >> >>/var/log/smtpd-debug.log >> >> >> >>-r-sr-sr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 95620 Sep 9 18:05 >> >> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd >> > >> > >> > > > >
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
At 06.08 11/09/2005, you wrote: Ok I did run the test like you said, I loged in as root stoped qmail and ran /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd manually and I still get the error 511 sorry, you must specify a domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser). Well, it means you are using a recipients without specifying a domain. It's a chkuser setting, that you may exclude if you don't like. Better you specify a default domain within vpopmail. Anyway, why don't you try a normal complete address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tonino Per my previous conversation I did compile UID and GID switching, an below you can see I changed the bit so that it can do this, however; even as root it still doesn't work and I think I'm going to be forced to remove the patch and just go about business like usual. Thanks for all the help tho. -doug > At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote: >>Greetings, >> >> I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have >>copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the >>new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any >>errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts >>without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent localhost >>25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using default >>chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug stderr. >> >>Heres my run command. I am using my mysql patch for tcpserver so you wont >>see the /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp file. This works PERFECTLY without >>chkuser. Before -u was 92 and -g was 91. its not set to vpopmail > > As chkuser reads qmail/vpopmail control files, if it runs as non > privileged user it will never be able to read any control file. > > You must be sure the running UID/GID may read files. > > If you log as root and run ./qmail-smtpd directly, you can enter the > same commands as you did telnetting, but chkuser will act as root and > will read everything. If it works, it means you must use appropriated > UID/GID. > > If you have multiple users, then you must use root as uid (using uid > switching for additional security if you are not using TLS). > > Tonino > >>#!/bin/sh >>export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" >>exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -S -u98 -g98 -v -c100 0 smtp >>/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2> >>/var/log/smtpd-debug.log >> >>-r-sr-sr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 95620 Sep 9 18:05 >> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > > >
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
Ok I did run the test like you said, I loged in as root stoped qmail and ran /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd manually and I still get the error 511 sorry, you must specify a domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser). Per my previous conversation I did compile UID and GID switching, an below you can see I changed the bit so that it can do this, however; even as root it still doesn't work and I think I'm going to be forced to remove the patch and just go about business like usual. Thanks for all the help tho. -doug > At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote: >>Greetings, >> >> I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have >>copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the >>new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any >>errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts >>without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent localhost >>25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using default >>chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug stderr. >> >>Heres my run command. I am using my mysql patch for tcpserver so you wont >>see the /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp file. This works PERFECTLY without >>chkuser. Before -u was 92 and -g was 91. its not set to vpopmail > > As chkuser reads qmail/vpopmail control files, if it runs as non > privileged user it will never be able to read any control file. > > You must be sure the running UID/GID may read files. > > If you log as root and run ./qmail-smtpd directly, you can enter the > same commands as you did telnetting, but chkuser will act as root and > will read everything. If it works, it means you must use appropriated > UID/GID. > > If you have multiple users, then you must use root as uid (using uid > switching for additional security if you are not using TLS). > > Tonino > >>#!/bin/sh >>export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" >>exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -S -u98 -g98 -v -c100 0 smtp >>/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2> >>/var/log/smtpd-debug.log >> >>-r-sr-sr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 95620 Sep 9 18:05 >> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > > >
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote: Greetings, I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent localhost 25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using default chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug stderr. Heres my run command. I am using my mysql patch for tcpserver so you wont see the /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp file. This works PERFECTLY without chkuser. Before -u was 92 and -g was 91. its not set to vpopmail As chkuser reads qmail/vpopmail control files, if it runs as non privileged user it will never be able to read any control file. You must be sure the running UID/GID may read files. If you log as root and run ./qmail-smtpd directly, you can enter the same commands as you did telnetting, but chkuser will act as root and will read everything. If it works, it means you must use appropriated UID/GID. If you have multiple users, then you must use root as uid (using uid switching for additional security if you are not using TLS). Tonino #!/bin/sh export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -S -u98 -g98 -v -c100 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2> /var/log/smtpd-debug.log -r-sr-sr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 95620 Sep 9 18:05 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
I did that as well. > On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have >> copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the >> new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving >> any >> errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts >> without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent >> localhost >> 25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using >> default >> chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug >> stderr. > > Don't forget to copy the files in /var/qmail/control and > /var/qmail/users. > > -Tom > >
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent localhost 25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using default chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug stderr. Don't forget to copy the files in /var/qmail/control and /var/qmail/users. -Tom
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+chkuser problems
Greetings, I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any errors adding domains, adding users, or using vuserinfo. qmail starts without any errors however; upon recieving test emails (telent localhost 25) it says that the domains I have added don't exist. I'm using default chkuser_settings.h file except that I enabled debuging and debug stderr. Heres my run command. I am using my mysql patch for tcpserver so you wont see the /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp file. This works PERFECTLY without chkuser. Before -u was 92 and -g was 91. its not set to vpopmail #!/bin/sh export QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -R -S -u98 -g98 -v -c100 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2> /var/log/smtpd-debug.log -r-sr-sr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 95620 Sep 9 18:05 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail using qmail-ldap schema.
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: isn't exporting to say.. a CSV file even easier? I would think so :) Yes it probably would be. But the only way I can see to get emerald to export user info is to use their ldap sync server. That or I would just have to access the database emerald stores info in. The reason I haven't done that yet is partially because of what my boss wants... but... they're very different packages, making the entry format compatible would be very difficult, if even possible. All of the info needed should be there though. The login and the domain are there, not sure about quota. So it should be possible to create a bridge between the two at least. don't say that too loud.. vol might hear it and rant about LDAP :) I should scream then. :P Josh
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail using qmail-ldap schema.
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 02:48 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote: > >you could also just export their information to say.. a flat file.. and > > then import that into whatever backend you want. > Yes, I could. I just picked LDAP because it was the easiest thing to > get our client software (Emerald) to export to. isn't exporting to say.. a CSV file even easier? I would think so :) > It is to bad vpopmail > doesnt have support for the qmail.schema found in qmail-ldap. they're very different packages, making the entry format compatible would be very difficult, if even possible. > If there isn't one there really should be some sort of standard for > this don't say that too loud.. vol might hear it and rant about LDAP :) -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpsu0Y8nbeOM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail using qmail-ldap schema.
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:04 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote: Hey, I am trying to get a new email server working using qmail+vpopmail+ldap. The user software we have will export users to the qmail-ldap schema. The problem is that it looks like the vpopmail ldap schema is not the same as the qmail-ldap schema. Is there a way to make vpopmail work with the qmail-ldap schema or do I have to get rid of vpopmail and just use qmail-ldap? Could I posible map the qmail-ldap schema to the vpopmail schema? I was also thinking that I might be able to use vpopmail with mysql and import from the ldap server via a user script of some sort. you could also just export their information to say.. a flat file.. and then import that into whatever backend you want. -Jeremy Yes, I could. I just picked LDAP because it was the easiest thing to get our client software (Emerald) to export to. It is to bad vpopmail doesnt have support for the qmail.schema found in qmail-ldap. If there isn't one there really should be some sort of standard for this *sigh* Josh
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail using qmail-ldap schema.
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:04 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote: > Hey, I am trying to get a new email server working using > qmail+vpopmail+ldap. The user software we have will export users to the > qmail-ldap schema. The problem is that it looks like the vpopmail ldap > schema is not the same as the qmail-ldap schema. > > Is there a way to make vpopmail work with the qmail-ldap schema or do I > have to get rid of vpopmail and just use qmail-ldap? > > Could I posible map the qmail-ldap schema to the vpopmail schema? > > I was also thinking that I might be able to use vpopmail with mysql and > import from the ldap server via a user script of some sort. you could also just export their information to say.. a flat file.. and then import that into whatever backend you want. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpCFrNLCpXX5.pgp Description: PGP signature
[vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail using qmail-ldap schema.
Hey, I am trying to get a new email server working using qmail+vpopmail+ldap. The user software we have will export users to the qmail-ldap schema. The problem is that it looks like the vpopmail ldap schema is not the same as the qmail-ldap schema. Is there a way to make vpopmail work with the qmail-ldap schema or do I have to get rid of vpopmail and just use qmail-ldap? Could I posible map the qmail-ldap schema to the vpopmail schema? I was also thinking that I might be able to use vpopmail with mysql and import from the ldap server via a user script of some sort. Any thoughts? Josh
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+courier ldap_auth
helo, I'm trying to install an ldap server to use as a mail server. When I try to log in, in the log file I can see these lines: Apr 18 10:03:54 debian-test imaplogin: Connection, ip=[:::10.100.50.90] Apr 18 10:03:55 debian-test slapd[12313]: <= bdb_equality_candidates: (uid) index_param failed (18) Apr 18 10:03:55 debian-test last message repeated 5 times Apr 18 10:04:02 debian-test imaplogin: LOGIN FAILED, ip=[:::10.100.50.90] Thanks for help Andrea
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+autoresponder2.0.5
On Friday 26 November 2004 02:23 am, Mariusz Czarnecki wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using set of software as in topic. > I've got line my.domain:my.domain line in virtualdomains file in qmail > control dir. > My virual domain is also default domain. > Reply message going from autorespond has sender address as > [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is definitely wrong. > Line included in dotqmail causing autoreply to work contains $ as the > last sing. > If I use + instead of $ sign autoreply message goes with empty sender > address which is also not acceptable for me. to avoid mail loops, any automated responses should have a null envelope sender. > How to get autorespond working properly, that's mean with correct sender > address set which should be recipient address of original message indeed. So say I have one of these autoresponders, and so do you. You send me an email, I autorespond. You respond to my autoresponse. I respond to your autoresponse to my autoresponse ... etc. What Problem Are You Trying To Solve? -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgphAifYUs4rF.pgp Description: PGP signature
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+autoresponder2.0.5
Hi all, I'm using set of software as in topic. I've got line my.domain:my.domain line in virtualdomains file in qmail control dir. My virual domain is also default domain. Reply message going from autorespond has sender address as [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is definitely wrong. Line included in dotqmail causing autoreply to work contains $ as the last sing. If I use + instead of $ sign autoreply message goes with empty sender address which is also not acceptable for me. How to get autorespond working properly, that's mean with correct sender address set which should be recipient address of original message indeed. Thanks for help in advance. Greetings macz begin:vcard fn:Mariusz Czarnecki n:Czarnecki;Mariusz org:PreVac Sp. z o.o.;Electronic Department adr:;;Raciborska 61;Rogow;Slask;44-362;Polska email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:IT Specialist tel;work:+48 32 4 512 511 tel;fax:+48 32 4 512 512 tel;cell:+48 606616390 url:http://www.prevac.pl version:2.1 end:vcard
RE: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP > > > Am Mi, den 08.09.2004 schrieb Michael Bowe um 23:20: > > > But! whenever I demonstrate the vpopmail software to any of the guys > > at my new place of employment, they are the ones who are marvelling at > > the ease of use and features of vpopmail. > > Indeed. > Postfix _is_ nice (cyrus is debatable, IMO), but what use is a mailserver without any webinterface for customers to add/modify/delete their users? > > There are lots of bits and pieces around, but no complete package. Just compare what is available to postfix with > qmail+patches^3+vpopmail+qmailadmin and see which one you want to start > with. > > > > cheers, > Rainer > -- > === > ~ Rainer Duffner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > ~ Freising - Munich - Germany ~ > ~Unix - Linux - BSD - OpenSource - Security ~ > ~ http://www.ultra-secure.de/~rainer/pubkey.pgp ~ === > Somehow I worry the discussion of MTA+MDA will venture to an evangelistic argument/discussion (much like that between linux/windows/mac etc). When we first came to the need for a more powerful MTA back in 1999, qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin seemed to be the best features wise, and administration wise. In dealing with the ever growing spam, a re-evaluation in 2003 lead us to believe that qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin still had a slight edge over the others, including postfix. As Rainer said, it seems that postfix has more upfront, but it still seems that qmail can be patched very well. Currently, I'm running qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin, qmail-scanner w/ClamAV, mailfilter invoking SpamAssassin for userbased SA. Qmails only holdback is the lack of development (but does a stable secure MTA need development?), patches add features as needed. But, its not like MTA requirements has changed over the years, it's the MDA, and that's easy to plug something else in its place. --joey
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
- Original Message - From: "Chris Ess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ooh... While we're at it, we could add vpopmail support for sendmail... Once vpopmail is abstracted from qmail that would be easy. :) I fully realize that everyone who uses vpopmail also uses qmail. Me too. A lot of people like qmail. Others would like to be able to use vpopmail (which is great) with other MTA that they are more familiar with or just prefer. This isn't anti-qmail its pro-vpopmail. -Steve
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
At 08:41 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote: - Original Message - From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. Are you being sarcastic? no. Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://www.smileglobal.com
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
At 08:39 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote: On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :) well, qmail isn't a ronco pocket fisherman either. that doesn't make it less than an excellent MTA. patching? okay, you've got me there. doesn't bother me however. i've run qmail since 1997. works great. no security issues. why muck with what works. i despise sendmail and will do anything in my power not to deal with sendmail. so a 'modern sendmail replacement' doesn't exactly make me do cartwheels. but i digress. Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://www.smileglobal.com
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. > > Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need > to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :) (in re 'MODERN') I disagree. Despite the age of the original code base, qmail is still a modern and viable replacement for sendmail. However, it's not very featureful -- which is fine for replacing most versions of sendmail anyway. I believe that the majority of sendmail installations do not use STARTTLS or SMTP AUTH. (in re patches) Funny. I've never thought so. One thing I like about having to patch qmail is the ability to decide at compile-time what extensions I want to use. This allows me to limit the amount of unused code compiled into my MTA. (In the era of modern computing and the prevalence of CPU's well over 2GHz, this may not mean a lot. However, I run qmail on a 50MHz SparcStation LX and I'm a bit picky about what goes into it.) Having only ever compiled Postfix once (and many moons ago at that), I do not know if the same option is present there. But I'm wandering off topic for the vpopmail list. Ooh... While we're at it, we could add vpopmail support for sendmail... ^_~ Sincerely, Chris Ess System Administrator / CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician)
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
- Original Message - From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. Are you being sarcastic? -Steve > At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote: > >- Original Message - > >From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with > > > postfix MTA :-) > > > >Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create > >an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpopmail functions do > >X rather than doing X with qmail). I promptly joined the development list > >but its low traffic and I don't really see a lot of those types of changes > >happening... nor do I see a well defined path layed out where anyone else > >can help to make this happen without either just doing it all themselves or > >contributing work with your fingers crossed. > > > >The main/only developers on vpopmail seem VERY fixated on qmail and for some > >reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA. > > > >-Steve > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com > http://www.smileglobal.com > > >
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :) > At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote: > >- Original Message - > >From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with > > > postfix MTA :-) > > > >Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create > >an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpopmail functions do > >X rather than doing X with qmail). I promptly joined the development list > >but its low traffic and I don't really see a lot of those types of changes > >happening... nor do I see a well defined path layed out where anyone else > >can help to make this happen without either just doing it all themselves or > >contributing work with your fingers crossed. > > > >The main/only developers on vpopmail seem VERY fixated on qmail and for some > >reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA. > > > >-Steve > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com > http://www.smileglobal.com > > > > -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point. At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote: - Original Message - From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with > postfix MTA :-) Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpopmail functions do X rather than doing X with qmail). I promptly joined the development list but its low traffic and I don't really see a lot of those types of changes happening... nor do I see a well defined path layed out where anyone else can help to make this happen without either just doing it all themselves or contributing work with your fingers crossed. The main/only developers on vpopmail seem VERY fixated on qmail and for some reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA. -Steve Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://www.smileglobal.com
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
- Original Message - From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with > postfix MTA :-) Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpopmail functions do X rather than doing X with qmail). I promptly joined the development list but its low traffic and I don't really see a lot of those types of changes happening... nor do I see a well defined path layed out where anyone else can help to make this happen without either just doing it all themselves or contributing work with your fingers crossed. The main/only developers on vpopmail seem VERY fixated on qmail and for some reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA. -Steve
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
Am Mi, den 08.09.2004 schrieb Michael Bowe um 23:20: > But! whenever I demonstrate the vpopmail software to any of the guys at my > new place of employment, they are the ones who are marvelling at the ease of > use and features of vpopmail. Indeed. Postfix _is_ nice (cyrus is debatable, IMO), but what use is a mailserver without any webinterface for customers to add/modify/delete their users? There are lots of bits and pieces around, but no complete package. Just compare what is available to postfix with qmail+patches^3+vpopmail+qmailadmin and see which one you want to start with. cheers, Rainer -- === ~ Rainer Duffner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ~ Freising - Munich - Germany ~ ~Unix - Linux - BSD - OpenSource - Security ~ ~ http://www.ultra-secure.de/~rainer/pubkey.pgp ~ ===
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
- Original Message - From: "Davide Giunchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Il mer, 2004-09-08 alle 19:55, Jesse Guardiani ha scritto: > > Howdy folks, > > > > Sorry for the flame bait, but I'm just curious what all you > > seasoned vpopmail veterans have to say about Postfix + Cyrus. > > > > Back in 2002 when my company chose to go with QMail + Vpopmail > > I thought it was the Right Choice, but these days I'm hearing a lot > > about Postfix + Cyrus. For a while there, it seemed like vpopmail > > development was grinding to a halt, but these days it seems to > I don't think that the problem is vpopmail, the problem is qmail: > after 6 years since 1.03 version there's no modific to the original > version, now you always need addictional feature like antivirus > integration, more spam filters, a lot of other things... this lead to a > patch-over-patch phenomenon that is an headace for the qmail > administrator. Yes I agree I extensively used qmail/vpopmail at the ISP I used to own. However, I sold the business to a larger ISP last year, and now "I work for them". They use postfix as their standard mail server. Since being exposed to this software I marvel at all the fabulous features compared with qmail. In particular the ease that you can perform a vast array of checks / filtering on incoming mail. The more I see of postfix, the more I understand just how out-of-date that qmail really is. But! whenever I demonstrate the vpopmail software to any of the guys at my new place of employment, they are the ones who are marvelling at the ease of use and features of vpopmail. The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with postfix MTA :-) Michael.
Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
Il mer, 2004-09-08 alle 19:55, Jesse Guardiani ha scritto: > Howdy folks, > > Sorry for the flame bait, but I'm just curious what all you > seasoned vpopmail veterans have to say about Postfix + Cyrus. > > Back in 2002 when my company chose to go with QMail + Vpopmail > I thought it was the Right Choice, but these days I'm hearing a lot > about Postfix + Cyrus. For a while there, it seemed like vpopmail > development was grinding to a halt, but these days it seems to No, i don't think that the vpopmail development is on a halt, i think that it's the opposite: vpopmail dev was stopped on v5.2.x version when was developed only by inter7, since Tom Collins has joined (or better: maintaned) the development vpopmail has get a big sprint. I don't think that the problem is vpopmail, the problem is qmail: after 6 years since 1.03 version there's no modific to the original version, now you always need addictional feature like antivirus integration, more spam filters, a lot of other things... this lead to a patch-over-patch phenomenon that is an headace for the qmail administrator. So you need a toaster like netqmail-1.05 + bill shupp patches, but sometimes this is not enoght. On the other hand postfix is active developed even on the core. So i think that the problem of qmail is its license and it's author's ego. > be picking back up again. Even QMail seems to be at least partially > back under development with the Netqmail package. It's giving me > hope for the platform that I've invested so much of my personal time > into. > > For those of you who have had the opportunity to work with BOTH > systems, which do you prefer and why? > > BTW, I currently run QMail + vpopmail & friends + courier-imap + sqwebmail. > Don't use sqwebmail, use squirrel. Regards. -- Davide Giunchi
[vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
Howdy folks, Sorry for the flame bait, but I'm just curious what all you seasoned vpopmail veterans have to say about Postfix + Cyrus. Back in 2002 when my company chose to go with QMail + Vpopmail I thought it was the Right Choice, but these days I'm hearing a lot about Postfix + Cyrus. For a while there, it seemed like vpopmail development was grinding to a halt, but these days it seems to be picking back up again. Even QMail seems to be at least partially back under development with the Netqmail package. It's giving me hope for the platform that I've invested so much of my personal time into. For those of you who have had the opportunity to work with BOTH systems, which do you prefer and why? BTW, I currently run QMail + vpopmail & friends + courier-imap + sqwebmail. Thanks! -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail authentication (SMTPafterPOP)
Ken Jones wrote: On Thursday 08 July 2004 11:12 am, Edilmar wrote: Ken Jones wrote: On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote: Hi, I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 + qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner. Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (into vpasswd file) to authenticate the sending of emails. I found some patches for QMail, but I'm doubt about the functionality of its with vpopmail users database. I work in a school and there are other units of it that uses internet providers with dinamic IPs. Then, all the time I need to change /etc/tcp.smtp to add the actual IP address for the list of external users to do SMTP relay. But I think if I will have SMTP authentication, I may do a QMail OPEN RELAY and all will work fine. Is this TRUE or I'm CRAZY to think about OPEN RELAY? Is there some alternatives to do this without OPEN RELAY? Use tonix's qmail-smtp/vpopmail auth patch. Smtp authentication is the cleanest way to go. Ken Jones But, with it, I will configure /etc/tcp.smtp for 0.0.0. => OPEN RELAY? No. Just configure tcp.smtp for all static IP's you want to allow to relay without authentication, like internal servers that need an outbound mail server. For example: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 209.218.8.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Ken Hi, I installed the smtp-auth patch, the certificate was created fine, client Mozilla recognized this certificate, and sending/receiving emails from LAN worked fine, but LAN IP is into /etc/tcp.smtp. Then, it's not using authentication. When I tried to remove LAN from /etc/tcp.smtp, to test real authentication the first message error was: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) 553 no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1) Then, I followed the link http://www.differentpla.net/node/view/170 where it's said to change the supervise/qmail-smtpd/run into user/group ID from QMail to VPopmail. After do this, the message error changed to the traditional: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) the error about gatewaying didn't occur more. What's the problem? Is it needed to execute the "run" script with VPopmail users/group? What about the first problem about gatewaying?
[vchkpw] Qmail+Vpopmail+Mysql
ola personal I am with a problem in my qmail I am using redhat 9,0 in this server this configured the qmail+myls+vpopmail the problem is that I do not obtain to order email for other dominíos rejection of my net I forgive for asking for to help for here waiting a brief return of all. _Alexandre Ricardo S.SilvaNetwork Administrator & Security AnalistCentral On Line ( Tornero & Cia )Componentizar ( Componentizar )Fone: 11-5070-6796
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail authentication (SMTPafterPOP)
On Thursday 08 July 2004 11:12 am, Edilmar wrote: > Ken Jones wrote: > >On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 + > >>qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner. > >> > >>Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of > >>SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (into > >>vpasswd file) to authenticate the sending of emails. > >> > >>I found some patches for QMail, but I'm doubt about the functionality of > >>its with vpopmail users database. > >> > >>I work in a school and there are other units of it that uses internet > >>providers with dinamic IPs. Then, all the time I need to > >>change /etc/tcp.smtp to add the actual IP address for the list of > >>external users to do SMTP relay. But I think if I will have > >>SMTP authentication, I may do a QMail OPEN RELAY and all will work fine. > >>Is this TRUE or I'm CRAZY to think > >>about OPEN RELAY? Is there some alternatives to do this without OPEN > >> RELAY? > > > >Use tonix's qmail-smtp/vpopmail auth patch. > >Smtp authentication is the cleanest way to go. > > > >Ken Jones > > But, with it, I will configure /etc/tcp.smtp for 0.0.0. => OPEN RELAY? No. Just configure tcp.smtp for all static IP's you want to allow to relay without authentication, like internal servers that need an outbound mail server. For example: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 209.218.8.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Ken
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail authentication (SMTPafterPOP)
Ken Jones wrote: On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote: Hi, I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 + qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner. Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (into vpasswd file) to authenticate the sending of emails. I found some patches for QMail, but I'm doubt about the functionality of its with vpopmail users database. I work in a school and there are other units of it that uses internet providers with dinamic IPs. Then, all the time I need to change /etc/tcp.smtp to add the actual IP address for the list of external users to do SMTP relay. But I think if I will have SMTP authentication, I may do a QMail OPEN RELAY and all will work fine. Is this TRUE or I'm CRAZY to think about OPEN RELAY? Is there some alternatives to do this without OPEN RELAY? Use tonix's qmail-smtp/vpopmail auth patch. Smtp authentication is the cleanest way to go. Ken Jones But, with it, I will configure /etc/tcp.smtp for 0.0.0. => OPEN RELAY?
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail authentication (SMTPafterPOP)
On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote: > Hi, > > I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 + > qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner. > > Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of > SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (into > vpasswd file) to authenticate the sending of emails. > > I found some patches for QMail, but I'm doubt about the functionality of > its with vpopmail users database. > > I work in a school and there are other units of it that uses internet > providers with dinamic IPs. Then, all the time I need to > change /etc/tcp.smtp to add the actual IP address for the list of > external users to do SMTP relay. But I think if I will have > SMTP authentication, I may do a QMail OPEN RELAY and all will work fine. > Is this TRUE or I'm CRAZY to think > about OPEN RELAY? Is there some alternatives to do this without OPEN RELAY? Use tonix's qmail-smtp/vpopmail auth patch. Smtp authentication is the cleanest way to go. Ken Jones
[vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail authentication (SMTPafterPOP)
Hi, I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 + qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner. Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (into vpasswd file) to authenticate the sending of emails. I found some patches for QMail, but I'm doubt about the functionality of its with vpopmail users database. I work in a school and there are other units of it that uses internet providers with dinamic IPs. Then, all the time I need to change /etc/tcp.smtp to add the actual IP address for the list of external users to do SMTP relay. But I think if I will have SMTP authentication, I may do a QMail OPEN RELAY and all will work fine. Is this TRUE or I'm CRAZY to think about OPEN RELAY? Is there some alternatives to do this without OPEN RELAY?
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo
or use uebimiau http://www.uebimiau.org - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Kitchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:48 am, Eric Anderson wrote: Hello, I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail, Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all configured and sending/receiving email properly (from what I can tell) by following the doc at: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/qmail-howto.xml eww. don't use that. Gentoo's qmail and qmail-related ebuilds are totally screwed. remove all that crap and install via www.lifewithqmail.org -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:48 am, Eric Anderson wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based > frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail, > Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all > configured and sending/receiving email properly (from what I can tell) > by following the doc at: > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/qmail-howto.xml eww. don't use that. Gentoo's qmail and qmail-related ebuilds are totally screwed. remove all that crap and install via www.lifewithqmail.org -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
[vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo
Hello,
I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based
frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail,
Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all
configured and sending/receiving email properly (from what I can tell)
by following the doc at:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/qmail-howto.xml
The doc recommends installing "Horde / IMP Webmail" for web-based email
but I liked sqwebmail better because it directly accesses the Maildir
files instead of going through POP or IMAP. So I went about trying to
get sqwebmail installed (an there currently does not exist a portage
package for this).
I am building sqwebmail without authdeamon support because the
Courier-IMAP package already installs the authdeamon with it. The
package builds and installs fine. The sqwebmail service starts up and I
get the login screen when I execute the CGI script through apache. I
type in my login information and it appears to login successfully but
gets an error when it tries to find my Maildir folders. The following is
the error message I get:
Unable to open the maildir for this account -- the maildir doesn't exist
or has incorrect ownership or permissions.
I was thinking that perhaps this is because gentoo uses the name
".maildir" instead of "Maildir" to store the mail files. I looked in the
auth.c file for my error message and found the following line:
if (login_maildir(getenv("MAILDIR")))
error("Unable to open the maildir for this account -- the maildir
doesn't exist or has incorrect ownership or permissions.");
So my thought is to set the MAILDIR environment variable to match
Gentoo's setup. So I put the following line in my Apache conf for this
particular virtual host:
SetEnv MAILDIR .maildir
Despite my efforts to point it to the correct place I still get the same
error message. So I am stuck. My questions are:
1) Am I even asking this question to the correct group. The sqwebmail
docs said to ask any questions that relate to vpopmail to this list.
2) Is there something I am missing. I want it to login to my mailbox
under vpopmail. The authentication module it is using is the authvchkpw
and it seems to be at least authenticating.
3) Any suggestions?
I greatly appreciate any help that I can get (or simply a pointer to the
correct place to ask this).
Thanks,
Eric
Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail - broken deliveries to a single domain
> delivery 25: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/ Even i keep getting this and till now, if i grep on my /var/log/qmail dir., i get... [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail]# grep "Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir" * -c @400040a78dbc24c33f4c.s:253 @400040a8751f27f2c8a4.s:161 @400040a9ad961158643c.s:131 @400040ab53f334c0fb64.s:177 @400040ac79ea2b5f050c.s:143 @400040adf7302f23aa44.s:43 @400040afa325159f9f24.s:92 current:0 lock:0 pop3d:0 smtpd:0 state:0 -- These many amount of deferral lines!! and /var/log/qmail -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98051 May 16 21:20 @400040a78dbc24c33f4c.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98132 May 17 13:47 @400040a8751f27f2c8a4.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98021 May 18 12:00 @400040a9ad961158643c.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98000 May 19 18:02 @400040ab53f334c0fb64.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98051 May 20 14:56 @400040ac79ea2b5f050c.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98093 May 21 18:03 @400040adf7302f23aa44.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 98045 May 23 00:29 @400040afa325159f9f24.s -rw-r-1 qmaill nofiles 95557 May 25 23:44 current Note that, 'current' file has none of those deferred lines. So from last two days its gone? Confusing. I have just my domain running on qmail and mails keep moving in and out without any problem. At first i got bugged but later kept quiet thinking this is a kind of issue related with Maildir or maildir. To be frank, i'm still not able to trace the problem i'm facing because of this. By its meaning, 'deferred' means delayed, unable to chdir_to_maildir, maybe because the mail in my box does'nt reach directly to the user inbox, i.e., mail is handled by qmail-scanner, Clam AV and SpamAssassin and then to inbox. Thought of all these and closed the issue by myself. If anyone educates me and Christopher more on this, we'll be very much thankful to them. :) Dheeraj.
[vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail - broken deliveries to a single domain
Hello all, I have a really odd problem. Let me first say that this does not appear to be a permissions problem, though it would at first glance. The problem domain we'll call example.edu. When you send an email to any of the addresses @example.edu, it will be deferred with the following message in the logs: delivery 25: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/ As I mentioned, at first glance, you would check permissions. All that appears to be well though. Here's what /var/qmail/users/assign looks like: +example.edu-:example.edu:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu:-:: +test.com-:test.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/test.com:-:: . Here's the directory structure for /var/vpopmail/domains/exmaple.edu/... (btw, vpopmail and vchkpw are uid 89): drwxr-xr-x 23 rootwheel512 May 25 10:45 /var/ drwxr-xr-x 9 vpopmail vchkpw 512 May 25 11:16 /var/vpopmail/ drwx-- 4 vpopmail vchkpw 512 May 25 11:02 /var/vpopmail/domains/ drwx-- 148 vpopmail vchkpw 4608 May 25 11:29 /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/ drwx-- 3 vpopmail vchkpw 512 Jan 31 2002 /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/tmoore/ drwx-- 25 vpopmail vchkpw 1024 May 25 04:37 /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/tmoore/Maildir/ drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 512 May 24 13:02 /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/tmoore/Maildir/new/ So, permissions look fine. I added the test.com to do some testing and it's working just fine with the same permissions and everything. I thought that perhaps I hit some sort of bug or limit with the number of users you can have in a single domain as example.edu has 3073, but I added 3500 users to test.com and all is well. The /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/vpasswd file looks OK too. I'm at a loss. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm guessing my last-resort plan will be to backup /var/vpopmail/domains/example.edu/, re-setup the domain and then recreate all the email accounts, copy back emails...big headache. :) Best wishes, - Chris This email was created with 100% recycled electrons.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail, vpopmail & qmail-scanner
On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 01:00 PM, Alastair Battrick wrote: I'm having problems getting vpopmail 5.3.29, qmail 1.03 and qmail-scanner 1.20rc3 working together on a RH9 box. QMAILQUEUE patch is installed. Qmail & vpopmail work fine without this line in /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" But it barfs when I put it in (there's a temporary error message when you try connect via smtp) Before I go any further, is vpopmail 5.3.30 likely to fix any of what might be causing these problems? I don't know if it will help with this particular problem, but 5.3.30 fixes a lot of problems with 5.3.29. I highly recommend 5.3.30 (or even 5.3.28) over 5.3.29. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/
RE: [vchkpw] qmail, vpopmail & qmail-scanner
Did you increase the memory that the smtp service can use? Look at your smtp/run file exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 1380 \ -Original Message- From: Alastair Battrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] qmail, vpopmail & qmail-scanner Hi I'm having problems getting vpopmail 5.3.29, qmail 1.03 and qmail-scanner 1.20rc3 working together on a RH9 box. QMAILQUEUE patch is installed. Qmail & vpopmail work fine without this line in /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" But it barfs when I put it in (there's a temporary error message when you try connect via smtp) Before I go any further, is vpopmail 5.3.30 likely to fix any of what might be causing these problems? Cheers Al
[vchkpw] qmail, vpopmail & qmail-scanner
Hi I'm having problems getting vpopmail 5.3.29, qmail 1.03 and qmail-scanner 1.20rc3 working together on a RH9 box. QMAILQUEUE patch is installed. Qmail & vpopmail work fine without this line in /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" But it barfs when I put it in (there's a temporary error message when you try connect via smtp) Before I go any further, is vpopmail 5.3.30 likely to fix any of what might be causing these problems? Cheers Al
[vchkpw] qMail + vPopMail working together better
This message is being sent to the vpopmail mailing list and the qmail mailing list I have been using qmail and vpopmail for a while now, but i am seeing some major things that should be addressed, to make the two work together better. The first being that if a user does not exist for a domain that vpopmail has, that it should drop the message immediately SMTPD level, and not send a email message, as this can cause a lot of trouble. Consider the following: Someone is sending you 100 messages an hour to a local domain that vpopmail handles, and it does not eexist. It will put the message in the queue, get vdelivermail to parse it, and then vdelivermail will create a bounce message and tell the sender that the account does not exist. The problem with this is though, that we have is that all those 100's of messages are messages with viruses. Now what we have is us bouncing back an email to an address that might not even exist, if it does exists its kinda bad for the person getting it as they will get 1000's of bounce messages, but if it does not exist, and is a qmail server as well, or Windows or whatever, it will sometimes also generate a bounce email instead of just a SMTP error code. Thus what happens now, is that we also get all the bounce messages back that the user does not exist. To the postmaster account. Making more unnecessary data transfer over the net. (Every bit counts). What i think qmail should include, is a way to have an program (Thus we do not want it hard coded, to keep it modular) to check if a users account exist, so that way you can run a program for the stock qmail to check if the unix user exists, and vpopmail can include code so that we can check the domains structure for the domain and user, and if the program exits with an error code, we drop the email at smtpd lever, thus not generating bounce messages, as the users local mail server will do that, saying that they gave up cause it did not work out. Another thing that would greatly be good to the qmail community and vpopmail, is support for auth. I know there are auth patches out there, but if it were included in the default release, it could include better support for it. Like with the qmail-pop3d its possible to choose what application to run to check the users email and account, on the stock this is check password, on the vpopmail install, this would be vchkpw. Now the current problem is that qmail AUTH patches are available freely, but they limit you if you use it with vchkpw, as you have to run qmail-smtpd and qmail-pop3d as root, to be able to authenticate with the services, or you have a problem, and you can not login. What i suggest is that somehow we make it work together, either under the same uid, and gid, or some other way. I can currently not think of any other good ways. That way we can run qmail-smtpd more secure, as i personally do not like having stuff running as root. Another feature i would like to see included with the stock qmail, but which is not really a major problem. Is qmail-imapd =). It would be great to have something like it, that works just like qmail-pop3d, and is just as fast, safe and modular. Thats all folks. J-W
Re: Re: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
W.D. McKinney wrote: >edit /etc/tcp.smtp and add 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" >then issue 'qmailctl cdb' >Then issue 'qmailctl stop' >then '/home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp' >now issue 'qmailctl start' > That got rid of the error message, but outgoing messages were still stuck in the qmail queue. After lots of searching it transpired that that eth0 was behaving unreliably, but only for outgoing trafic. My test-machine was an old 200 MHz Dell Optiplex. This is probably a Linus driver problem, as it ran Win 2000 without a hitch. Anyway, I installed everything on a new machine and now it worked stright away. By the way, I am still curious about the role of /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp. >Try sending to remote users now and let us know. Im sending this message via the new qmail/vpopmail setup. Thanks for the help. Sigmund.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
did you run tcprules?? - Original Message - From: "Sigmund Gudvangen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:41 AM Subject: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.) > Hi, > > I have just done a fresh install of qmail and vpopmail, on Mandrake 9.1, > following Dave Sill, http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html for the qmail > installation. qmail is running fine; i.e. all four daemons are running and > inst_check reports that all is well. > > I also managed to install vpopmail and add domains and users. Booth messages > injected locally (using qmail-inject) and incomming messages via smtp (from > KMail on another machine) duely arrive in the appropriate Maildir/new. > > However, when I attempt to send to an extern email-address (from KMail) qmail > responds with the error message: "sorry, that domain isn't in my list of > allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)". > > OK, the messaage is from qmail, but I think it is related to vpopmail, as I > also have qmail (without vpopmail) running on another PC, and on with that > machine I have no problems sending to external addresses. > > I installed vpopmail as follows: > ./configure --enable-file-sync=y --enable-roaming-users=y > make > make install-strip > > and put > > 10.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > > into /etc/tcp.smtp and added > > 40 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp 2>&1 /dev/null > > to crontab. > > The last response to > [vchkpw] smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) > i.e > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14771.html > suggest putting > 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > into /etc/tcp.smtp > I have also tried that, but it didn't make any difference. > > Booth the above response and the vpopmail install instructions mention > /etc/tcp.smtp, > but I can find anything about /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp > What's the latter for? > > Any ideas what's wrong? > > Regards > Sigmund. > > > > In case it helps, here is the output from /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl: > > qmail home directory: /var/qmail. > user-ext delimiter: -. > paternalism (in decimal): 2. > silent concurrency limit: 120. > subdirectory split: 23. > user ids: 502, 504, 505, 0, 506, 507, 508, 509. > group ids: 502, 503. > > badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. > > bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. > > bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is mydomain.net. > > concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10. > > concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 20. > > databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes. > > defaultdomain: Default domain name is mydomain.net. > > defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is mydomain.net. > > doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: mydomain.net. > > doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. > > envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is mydomain.net. > > helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is mydomain.net. > > idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is mydomain.net. > > localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes mydomain.net. > > locals: > > me: My name is mydomain.net. > > percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. > > plusdomain: Plus domain name is mydomain.net. > > qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. > > queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds. > > rcpthosts: > SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at mydomain.net. > SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at amotherdomain.net. > > morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. > > morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. > > smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 mydomain.net. > > smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. > > timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. > > timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. > > timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. > > virtualdomains: > Virtual domain: mydomain.net:mydomain.net > Virtual domain: anotherdomain.net:anotherdomain.net > > concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does. > > rcpthosts.lock: I have no idea what this file does. > > defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. > > virtualdomains.lock: I have no idea what this file does. > >
Re: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:41, Sigmund Gudvangen wrote: > Hi, > > I have just done a fresh install of qmail and vpopmail, on Mandrake 9.1, > following Dave Sill, http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html for the qmail > installation. qmail is running fine; i.e. all four daemons are running and > inst_check reports that all is well. > > I also managed to install vpopmail and add domains and users. Booth messages > injected locally (using qmail-inject) and incomming messages via smtp (from > KMail on another machine) duely arrive in the appropriate Maildir/new. > > However, when I attempt to send to an extern email-address (from KMail) qmail > responds with the error message: "sorry, that domain isn't in my list of > allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)". > > OK, the messaage is from qmail, but I think it is related to vpopmail, as I > also have qmail (without vpopmail) running on another PC, and on with that > machine I have no problems sending to external addresses. > > I installed vpopmail as follows: > ./configure --enable-file-sync=y --enable-roaming-users=y > make > make install-strip > > and put > > 10.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > > into /etc/tcp.smtp and added > > 40 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp 2>&1 /dev/null > > to crontab. > > The last response to > [vchkpw] smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) > i.e > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14771.html > suggest putting > 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT > into /etc/tcp.smtp > I have also tried that, but it didn't make any difference. > > Booth the above response and the vpopmail install instructions mention > /etc/tcp.smtp, > but I can find anything about /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp > What's the latter for? > > Any ideas what's wrong? > > Regards > Sigmund. > > edit /etc/tcp.smtp and add 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" then issue 'qmailctl cdb' Then issue 'qmailctl stop' then '/home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp' now issue 'qmailctl start' Try sending to remote users now and let us know. Dee > > In case it helps, here is the output from /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl: > > qmail home directory: /var/qmail. > user-ext delimiter: -. > paternalism (in decimal): 2. > silent concurrency limit: 120. > subdirectory split: 23. > user ids: 502, 504, 505, 0, 506, 507, 508, 509. > group ids: 502, 503. > > badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. > > bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. > > bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is mydomain.net. > > concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10. > > concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 20. > > databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes. > > defaultdomain: Default domain name is mydomain.net. > > defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is mydomain.net. > > doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: mydomain.net. > > doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. > > envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is mydomain.net. > > helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is mydomain.net. > > idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is mydomain.net. > > localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes mydomain.net. > > locals: > > me: My name is mydomain.net. > > percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. > > plusdomain: Plus domain name is mydomain.net. > > qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. > > queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds. > > rcpthosts: > SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at mydomain.net. > SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at amotherdomain.net. > > morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. > > morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. > > smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 mydomain.net. > > smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. > > timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. > > timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. > > timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. > > virtualdomains: > Virtual domain: mydomain.net:mydomain.net > Virtual domain: anotherdomain.net:anotherdomain.net > > concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does. > > rcpthosts.lock: I have no idea what this file does. > > defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. > > virtualdomains.lock: I have no idea what this file does. -- W.D.McKinney (Dee) | Affordable E-Mail and Internet Solutions Alaska Wireless Systems | for Schools, Libraries, Clinics & Business' http://www.akwireless.net | Call 1-907-349-4308
[vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
Hi, I have just done a fresh install of qmail and vpopmail, on Mandrake 9.1, following Dave Sill, http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html for the qmail installation. qmail is running fine; i.e. all four daemons are running and inst_check reports that all is well. I also managed to install vpopmail and add domains and users. Booth messages injected locally (using qmail-inject) and incomming messages via smtp (from KMail on another machine) duely arrive in the appropriate Maildir/new. However, when I attempt to send to an extern email-address (from KMail) qmail responds with the error message: "sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)". OK, the messaage is from qmail, but I think it is related to vpopmail, as I also have qmail (without vpopmail) running on another PC, and on with that machine I have no problems sending to external addresses. I installed vpopmail as follows: ./configure --enable-file-sync=y --enable-roaming-users=y make make install-strip and put 10.0.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT into /etc/tcp.smtp and added 40 * * * * /home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp 2>&1 /dev/null to crontab. The last response to [vchkpw] smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1) i.e http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14771.html suggest putting 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT into /etc/tcp.smtp I have also tried that, but it didn't make any difference. Booth the above response and the vpopmail install instructions mention /etc/tcp.smtp, but I can find anything about /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp What's the latter for? Any ideas what's wrong? Regards Sigmund. In case it helps, here is the output from /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl: qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 120. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 502, 504, 505, 0, 506, 507, 508, 509. group ids: 502, 503. badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed. bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON. bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is mydomain.net. concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10. concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 20. databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes. defaultdomain: Default domain name is mydomain.net. defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is mydomain.net. doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: mydomain.net. doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster. envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is mydomain.net. helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is mydomain.net. idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is mydomain.net. localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes mydomain.net. locals: me: My name is mydomain.net. percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed. plusdomain: Plus domain name is mydomain.net. qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers. queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds. rcpthosts: SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at mydomain.net. SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at amotherdomain.net. morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect. morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect. smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 mydomain.net. smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes. timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds. timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds. timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds. virtualdomains: Virtual domain: mydomain.net:mydomain.net Virtual domain: anotherdomain.net:anotherdomain.net concurrencyincoming: I have no idea what this file does. rcpthosts.lock: I have no idea what this file does. defaultdelivery: I have no idea what this file does. virtualdomains.lock: I have no idea what this file does.
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
procmail is a mail filter, not a replacement for vpopmail, so just install procmail and you will not need to migrate anything. - Original Message - From: "Neo Wee Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin Does procmail support support virtual domains like vpopmail? Never tried procmail before and have no intention to migrate Thanks anyway, is there any alternatives? -Original Message- From: Júlio Espada Olivares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:43 PM To: Neo Wee Teck; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin Your solution will never work. I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this: .qmail-default: |preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules /etc/procmailrules: 0fw * < 25 | spamc :0: *^X-Spam-Flag: YES /home/spam :0w |/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox This works fine for me. - Original Message - From: "Neo Wee Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:31 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin > I tried to setup spammassassin with spamd/spamc but seems it doesn't work > > /var/qmail/rc > > #!/bin/sh > > # Using splogger to send the log through syslog. > # Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default. > > exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ > qmail-start "`cat /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery`" > > --- > > /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery > > | spamc | maildir ./Maildir/ > > --- > > I only would like to filter mail sent to local mailboxes > > Any help? > > > >
RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
Does procmail support support virtual domains like vpopmail? Never tried procmail before and have no intention to migrate Thanks anyway, is there any alternatives? -Original Message- From: Júlio Espada Olivares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:43 PM To: Neo Wee Teck; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin Your solution will never work. I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this: .qmail-default: |preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules /etc/procmailrules: 0fw * < 25 | spamc :0: *^X-Spam-Flag: YES /home/spam :0w |/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox This works fine for me. - Original Message - From: "Neo Wee Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:31 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin > I tried to setup spammassassin with spamd/spamc but seems it doesn't work > > /var/qmail/rc > > #!/bin/sh > > # Using splogger to send the log through syslog. > # Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default. > > exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ > qmail-start "`cat /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery`" > > --- > > /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery > > | spamc | maildir ./Maildir/ > > --- > > I only would like to filter mail sent to local mailboxes > > Any help? > > > >
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
Your solution will never work. I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this: .qmail-default: |preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules /etc/procmailrules: 0fw * < 25 | spamc :0: *^X-Spam-Flag: YES /home/spam :0w |/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox This works fine for me. - Original Message - From: "Neo Wee Teck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:31 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin > I tried to setup spammassassin with spamd/spamc but seems it doesn't work > > /var/qmail/rc > > #!/bin/sh > > # Using splogger to send the log through syslog. > # Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default. > > exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ > qmail-start "`cat /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery`" > > --- > > /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery > > | spamc | maildir ./Maildir/ > > --- > > I only would like to filter mail sent to local mailboxes > > Any help? > > > >
[vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
I tried to setup spammassassin with spamd/spamc but seems it doesn't work /var/qmail/rc #!/bin/sh # Using splogger to send the log through syslog. # Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default. exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start "`cat /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery`" --- /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery | spamc | maildir ./Maildir/ --- I only would like to filter mail sent to local mailboxes Any help?
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail problem forking vchkpw?
Hi, Clinton James wrote: I'm working in gentoo with qmail 1.03 and vpopmail 5.2.1. POP works just fine but authenticated STMP is a bust. Using some of the information I have found here and other places I used strace to try and find out what the problem is. As best as I can tell I am getting a bad file descripter when qmail is forking vchkpw. For the gory details see http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=490320 Can anyone point me in the right direction? What options and patches does a Gentoo emerge add to vpopmail and/or qmail ? How many rcpthosts do you have and are you using morercpthosts as well? Regards, Rick
[vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail problem forking vchkpw?
I'm working in gentoo with qmail 1.03 and vpopmail 5.2.1. POP works just fine but authenticated STMP is a bust. Using some of the information I have found here and other places I used strace to try and find out what the problem is. As best as I can tell I am getting a bad file descripter when qmail is forking vchkpw. For the gory details see http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=490320 Can anyone point me in the right direction?
RE: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail + qmailadmin + vqadmin
Not quite sure how your setup is.. but I finally got maildrop/vpopmail working for me by using a version of vpopmail that has the seekable patch and putting a .qmail file inside each user's directory who wants a spam filter. It has worked out beneficially for me because the spam filter can now be set on a per-user basis instead of a per-domain basis when I was doing it through .qmail-default. Quotas seem to work just fine with both maildrop 1.3.8 and 1.6.0, I haven't really noticed a difference. It supposedly ignores the MAILDIRQUOTA variable now and just reads the maildirquota file, but I haven't removed the MAILDIRQUOTA variable from my maildrop script either. Haven't seen a need for it, system is performing just fine and I doubt removing that line would make a very notiacable different. A thing to note about the .qmail method inside each user's directory is that vpopmail hands the message off to maildrop and maildrop then acts as the delivery agent in place of vpopmail. The other cool thing about having it on a per-user basis is that I don't need to worry about people clobbering their .qmail-default file with qmailadmin. Hope that helps some.. -Clayton -Original Message- From: Casey Zacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail + qmailadmin + vqadmin It's been a long long time since I last looked at this stuff, but I really want/need to implement it. 1 - qmail - is simple. 2 - vpopmail + maildrop - this is where i am now (again). As I recall it, my problems went something like this: A. I had to "mkdir courier" when building maildrop to get it to read MAILDIRQUOTA from the environment. B. I had to write some shell scripts to wrap maildrop for the actual delivery, basically to take the place of vdelivermail. Right now, I'm not sure why, but I think it was in order to get quotas working properly; setting the MAILDIRQUOTA, HOME, and DEFAULT environment vars. In the end, they call "maildrop -d vpopmail .mailfilter" I had to patch vpopmail to use these scripts instead of vdelivermail. C. I had apparently patched vdominfo to add a -A flag to display domain aliases. D. I had apparently patched vpopmail to not allow one to delete a domain if there were aliases for it. Anyway, it's been a long time since I really looked at this stuff. The last version of vpopmail I looked at was 5.3.3, and the last version of maildrop I looked at was 1.3.8. I just looked at the changelog for maildrop up to 1.6.0, and I see that there was some work on the quota handling, so I might not need my shell scripts anymore. Basically, I'm looking for any pointers for getting vpopmail, maildrop, and sqwebmail working together nicely. I'll be using MySQL on the backend for vpopmail, and (of course?) Maildirs for storing the email. Thanks in advance.. -- Casey Zacek Senior Engineer NeoSpire, Inc.
[vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail + qmailadmin + vqadmin
It's been a long long time since I last looked at this stuff, but I really want/need to implement it. 1 - qmail - is simple. 2 - vpopmail + maildrop - this is where i am now (again). As I recall it, my problems went something like this: A. I had to "mkdir courier" when building maildrop to get it to read MAILDIRQUOTA from the environment. B. I had to write some shell scripts to wrap maildrop for the actual delivery, basically to take the place of vdelivermail. Right now, I'm not sure why, but I think it was in order to get quotas working properly; setting the MAILDIRQUOTA, HOME, and DEFAULT environment vars. In the end, they call "maildrop -d vpopmail .mailfilter" I had to patch vpopmail to use these scripts instead of vdelivermail. C. I had apparently patched vdominfo to add a -A flag to display domain aliases. D. I had apparently patched vpopmail to not allow one to delete a domain if there were aliases for it. Anyway, it's been a long time since I really looked at this stuff. The last version of vpopmail I looked at was 5.3.3, and the last version of maildrop I looked at was 1.3.8. I just looked at the changelog for maildrop up to 1.6.0, and I see that there was some work on the quota handling, so I might not need my shell scripts anymore. Basically, I'm looking for any pointers for getting vpopmail, maildrop, and sqwebmail working together nicely. I'll be using MySQL on the backend for vpopmail, and (of course?) Maildirs for storing the email. Thanks in advance.. -- Casey Zacek Senior Engineer NeoSpire, Inc.
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+openldap+qmailadmin in redhat7.3
lixiang, I'd encountered exactly the same problem(-ERR aack, child crashed) with vchkpw using LDAP as backend. I'd tried many different configurations and finally it seem like I can get around this problem. The solution is configure vpopmail with --enable-clear-passwd=n parameter. My configure statement looks like: ./configure --enable-ldap=y --enable-clear-passwd=n I have no idea how this fix the problem, but it's something with the authentication. Hope this help, Phatrakom be [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shop all amazing products and get our special offers!
[vchkpw] qmail+Vpopmail: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir - HEEEELP!!!!
Hello! Help please: Have qmail-1.03, vpopmail-5.2.1. I understood, some program can't obtain access to maildir, but which program exactly and what is it need? /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com.ua/manager1: drwx-- 5 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jul 3 16:37 Maildir /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com.ua/manager1/Maildir: drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jun 30 14:59 cur -rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 1059 Jul 18 08:18 maildirsize drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jul 18 08:18 new drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jul 17 03:06 tmp Is this right dir? is any FAQ about it? -- Best regards, Sandy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+openldap+qmailadmin in redhat7.3
Hi, Jens: actually, my rootdn was " cn=root,dc=koal,dc=com" in both my vldap.h and slapd.conf in the before, and i ensured that the basedn in vldap.h was "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" . i tested what you mentioned just now, this cann't help me . the "err acck ,child crashed " error remains. if i input a user which doesn't exsit, it will reports " err authorization failed". if i input the correct user and password, it will reports" err acck, child crashed" . i think it has recognized the user and password ,but sth lead to the "child crashed" error. i have searched the vpopmail mailing list, there were many reports about the same error, and it seems that many reasons will lead to this error, but until now, i still havn't find any valuable solution to me. my configure parameters: ./configure --enalbe-ldap=y --enable-roaming-users=y --enable-logging=y redhat 7.3 vpopmail-5.3.20 openldap-2.0.27 qmailadmin-1.0.20 any suggestions? thanks a lot, :-),
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+openldap+qmailadmin in redhat7.3
Zitat von lixiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi lixiang, OK, now I see your Prob !! It is somekind of loop that you configured: See here: slapd.conf: --- snip > suffix "dc=koal,dc=com" > rootdn "cn=root,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" <--- WRONG !! --- snap vldap.h --- snip > #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" > #define VLDAP_USER "cn=root,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" <--- WRONG !! --- snap ### You solution should look like this: slapd.conf: --- snip > suffix "dc=koal,dc=com" > rootdn "cn=root,dc=koal,dc=com"< This is the difference --- snap vldap.h --- snip > #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" > #define VLDAP_USER "cn=root,dc=koal,dc=com" < This is the difference --- snap The rootdn must _not_ be a ldap entry that is inside your trie !!! It is just an "internal" User !! So you might try this. And remenber ! Your organisation ( dc=koal,dc=com ) and your arganisational Unit ( ou=people, dc=koal, dc=com) must both exist !! And please make sure yout BASEDN in vldap.h is used. E.g. like #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" And delete the #if-def clause Cheers Jens
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+openldap+qmailadmin in redhat7.3
hi,Jens: I did guess that you should be off for your business trip or holidays , :-) I think basedn and binddn is the same in my vldap.h and slapd.conf, and if i have the below entry tree in my openldap through ldapbrowser: dc=koal,dc=com | ->ou=people | -> ou=net.koal.com |->uid=postmaster ->uid=test and my slapd.conf: databaseldbm suffix "dc=koal,dc=com" rootdn "cn=root,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" rootpw x ( here is the same with the password in vldap.h) and my vldap.h: #undef OLD_VLDAP #define VLDAP_SERVER "localhost" #define VLDAP_PORT LDAP_PORT #define VLDAP_USER "cn=root,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" #define VLDAP_PASSWORD "x" ( here is the same with the password in slapd.conf) #define MAX_BUFF 500 #ifdef OLD_VLDAP #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=Subs, o=vpop" #else #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" #endif I test the pop3 authentication : [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user test +OK pass test Error: No such object matched DN: "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" -ERR authorization failed Connection closed by foreign host. and then maillog reports: Jul 16 14:39:29 mailserver vpopmail[1244]: vchkpw-pop3: vpopmail user not found test@:127.0.0.1 if i test the pop3 with a domain that doesn't exsits : [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] +OK pass test Error: No such object matched DN: "ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" -ERR authorization failed then maillog reports: Jul 16 14:42:06 mailserver vpopmail[1261]: vchkpw-pop3: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:127.0.0.1 it seems that i should submit the correct and complete email add: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then i test : [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user [EMAIL PROTECTED] +OK pass test -ERR aack, child crashed and then maillog reports nothing about this failed login. it seems that the vchkpw has recognized this [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,but child crashed error is occured. what's happened?
Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail+openldap+qmailadmin in redhat7.3
Zitat von lixiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi lixiang, sorry for my late responds, I have been off for holiday ;-)) So if you verified your LDAP-Entries that they look like below ( e.g. with gq ) your are fine. > dc=koal,dc=com > | > ->ou=people >| > -> ou=test.com > | > ->uid=postmaster > ->uid=user1 > ->uid=user2 > It may be an access error, please check your settings in slapd.conf and compare them with your compilation in vldap.h BaseDN and Binddn _must_ be correct, because if vpopmail tries to bind via an non existing ldap-user it doesn't see any entries at all. Here is a sample of a successful auth: ---snip conn=1047818 fd=7 ACCEPT from IP=::1 32811 (IP=:: 389) Jul 15 10:35:09 mail slapd[4671]: conn=1047818 op=0 BIND dn="cn=,dc=x,dc=net" method=128 Jul 15 10:35:09 mail slapd[4671]: conn=1047818 op=0 AUTHZ dn="cn=,dc=x,dc=net" mech=simple ssf=0 Jul 15 10:35:09 mail slapd[4671]: conn=1047818 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Jul 15 10:35:09 mail slapd[21275]: conn=1047818 op=1 SRCH base="ou=x.de,ou=people,dc=x,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(& (objectClass=qmailUser)(uid=user1))" Jul 15 10:35:09 mail slapd[21275]: conn=1047818 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=1 text= --- snap Make sure your settings in vldap.h are correct: --- snip define VLDAP_SERVER "localhost" #define VLDAP_PORT LDAP_PORT #define VLDAP_USER "cn=root,dc=,dc=net" < This must be equal to slapd.conf #define VLDAP_PASSWORD "password"< This must be equal to slapd.conf #define MAX_BUFF 500 #define VLDAP_BASEDN "ou=people,dc=x,dc=net" --- snap Look at slapd.conf ### --- snip rootdn "cn=root,dc=,dc=net" <--- This must be equal to vldap.h rootpwpassword < This must be equal to vldap.h --- snap I think that is the reason for your probs. Have both of the initial LDAP-entries completed ? snip dn: dc=xxx,dc=net objectclass: organization o: xxx dn:ou=people,dc=,dc=cn objectclass: organizationalUnit ou:people snap Please let me know if that doesnt help. Cheers Jens
