Re: [Gimp-developer] on moving toward a 2.4 release

2006-08-12 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Robert L Krawitz wrote: >GIMP 2.0 was released on March 23, 2004, and then GIMP 2.2 on >December 19, 2004. This was a 9 month release cycle, which is >quite reasonable. Howver, it has been over a year and a half since >the 2.2 release, and we are still not v

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Even if I didn't completely screw it up, I imagine there will be some > discussion. I have many doubts about my wording myself. Some issues as > I see them: > 2. In a couple of places I employed the term "selection frame" in > order to differentiate

Re: [Gimp-developer] fact roundup

2006-07-18 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:31:10 -0700 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev > Subject: [Gimp-developer] fact roundup > > GNOME has been very generous with its cvs (now svn i hear) server and > bug

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-08 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:57:49 +0200 > From: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:13 -0400, Fennec wrote

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-08 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:36:51 -0300 > From: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:47 pm, Sven Neumann wrot

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-07-05 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Fennec wrote: > Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:13:47 -0400 > From: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Currently the GIMP on Windows has 1 icon that is used for all fil

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-07-01 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:33 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-devel > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-28 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Kevin Cozens wrote: > > That's nice, but the task is to come up with a short string that must > > fit into a single line and is oriented towards the user, not towards a > > script programmer. The string will be visible in the status bar when > > browsing the menus. Something

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review > > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to >

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

2006-06-18 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:01:00 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon t

Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

2006-06-17 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Dalai Felinto wrote: > Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:00:13 -0300 > From: Dalai Felinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new defaul

Old and new [Re: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal]

2006-06-17 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Jakub Steiner wrote: > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:16:26 +0200 > From: Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Gimp-developer] new default icon theme proposal > > Hi GIMP developers, > I write to pr

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer

2006-06-03 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote: > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 14:29:02 +0200 > From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer > > Sebastian Breuers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The plu

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

2006-05-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Michael Natterer wrote: > Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:51:22 +0200 > From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image forma

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

2006-05-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:52:44 -0400 > From: Nathan Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format > > On 5/26/

Re: [Gimp-developer] New microsoft image format

2006-05-26 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > > I di dnot download it, bu I read the agreement for ownlaoding it. One > > keep his soul and his mother in doing so. I mean- there is no nasty > > They announce a lot of miracles for this format, and it would be nice > > to be able to read and writ

Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC Q: SDI vs MDI?

2006-05-23 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:51:56 +0200 > From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] SoC Q: SDI vs MDI? > > Michael J. Hammel wrote: > > > Is the SoC page correct where it asks for an "SDI mana

Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay

2006-05-17 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:52:08 +0400 > From: Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Suggestion: Make the 'New > layer'commanddefaultto 'New lay > > On 5/17/06, Martin Nordholts wrote: > > I th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp connotations ?

2006-05-16 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Fennec wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:11:17 -0400 > From: Fennec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp connotations ? > > Well... I don't think I've even seen an IBM product with a name as bad > as The GIMP. I think a name change w

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

2006-05-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 14 May 2006, David [utf-8] Gómez wrote: > Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:51:52 +0200 > From: "David [utf-8] Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification > > Hi Alan, > > On Ma

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

2006-05-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:55:39 -0700 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification > > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp certification

2006-05-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: [...] > Besides that, certifications are sometimes sought for those without > the abilities or application to stand by themselves, either in their > C.V. or personally. Listing "GIMP" [1] as one of your qualifications on a resume is more l

Re: [Gimp-developer] RFC: three questions for the LXF article

2006-05-11 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Michael J. Hammel wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:52:24 -0600 > From: Michael J. Hammel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMP Developer Mailing List > Subject: [Gimp-developer] RFC: three questions for the LXF article > > If anyone wants to comment on these, please feel free. >

Search of Filters [Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Google SoC]

2006-04-21 Thread Alan Horkan
ed to add a button which would bring up the currently selected filter but I didn't get very far with it, although I do think it should be possible to hack together soemthing. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Open Clip Art http://OpenClipArt.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-19 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:02:47 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Not Photoshop > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP and Google SoC

2006-04-19 Thread Alan Horkan
t; - Healing tool: like clone tool with extra steps and special blend > mode. Request for a Healing brush: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109801 > A different thing: > > - Improve the save session support. Currently dock order and other > details are remembered. Re

Re: [Gimp-developer] Customzing GIMP

2006-04-18 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Nathan Summers wrote: > On 4/17/06, digi artist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All I really want to do is to hide some menu items (especially when the > > picture has been opened) and rename some items on the 'Filters' menu. > > period. > > I would really appreciate your hel

Re: [Gimp-developer] Can we redearch end user needs and come up with a long term developement solution.

2006-04-18 Thread Alan Horkan
ss they really want to. combine that with the option of running windows programs using Wine <http://winehq.com> I'm not sure I agree with your assertion about programs being scarce. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com _

Background window [was Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP and Google SoC]

2006-04-18 Thread Alan Horkan
ses: "Gimp Background window version 2.1, Copyright (C) 2004" As far as I can tell is what is less flatteringly but better know as the GIMP Deweirdifyer since the source archive for it is labelled BackgroundWindow. Is there some techincal reason making it impractical to integrate th

Re: [Gimp-developer] Customzing GIMP

2006-04-17 Thread Alan Horkan
it. What changes do you have in mind? Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Open Clip Art http://OpenClipArt.org Alan's Diary http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface...

2006-04-02 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Roland Wild wrote: > Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 04:00:35 -0400 > From: Roland Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: [Gimp-developer] Plea for a new interface... > > Carol, > > I can't understand your response. (maybe a little because of the

Re: [Gimp-developer] What is this list?

2006-04-01 Thread Alan Horkan
rephrasing it. You may ask questions but you might not always get answers. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] A few suggestions forThe Gimp

2006-04-01 Thread Alan Horkan
> Hope my suggestions are not too impractical. With interested developers, time and resources they sound possible. Otherwise they are more nice suggestions which might not go anywhere. Sincerely Alan Horkan ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] make a test

2006-03-31 Thread Alan Horkan
te s'il vous plais: http://gimp.org/mail_lists.html "Use the English language" It may not be in the rules but there is a rule on Internet Relay Chat (IRC) and it applies equally well to the mailing lists: Do not ask permission to ask a question, just ask. Sincerely Alan Horkan P.S. I tried

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déj à vu? (Re : Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [iso-8859-1] D?j[iso-8859-1] ? vu? > (Re[iso-8859-1] : Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions') > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:18:22PM +0100, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, GSR - FR wrote: > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:48:23 +0200 > From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: [Gimp-developer] [iso-8859-1] D?j? vu? (Re: Why be c[iso-8859-1] > ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions') > > Hi, > [EM

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions'

2006-03-23 Thread Alan Horkan
what functionality most closely corresponds to what they are expecting which might help users to adapt. (Although like others I'd prefer if users didn't have to adapt quite so much and if more changes were made to meet peoples expectations unless there was a specific reasons not to accept

Re: [Gimp-developer] support for the PSD

2006-03-03 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Florent Monnier wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:27:30 +0100 > From: Florent Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Gimp-developer] support for the PSD > > > It is somewhat futile to point out that support for the PSD format > > ne

Re: Image exchange format [was Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec]

2006-03-03 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:36:42 + > From: Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: Image exchange format [was Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop > PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

Image exchange format [was Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec]

2006-03-02 Thread Alan Horkan
format is developed. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF format Spec

2006-03-02 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Manish Singh wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:11:42 -0800 > From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: John Cupitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: GIMPDev > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Photoshop PSD 6 format Spec / Gimp XCF > format Spec > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:0

Re: [Gimp-developer] [OT] Adobe Developers have a sense of humour

2005-07-05 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:50:14 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: The GNU Image Manipulation Program > > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [OT] Adobe Developers

[Gimp-developer] [OT] Adobe Developers have a sense of humour

2005-07-05 Thread Alan Horkan
screenshots which should come in handy if anyone needs a reference or wants to make any comparisions in future http://www.aresluna.org/guidebook/apps/photoshop (Pointed out to me by Krita developer Boudewijn Rempt.) Hope some of you find it interesting or even useful. Sincerely Alan Horkan

Re: [Gimp-developer] Krita news

2005-06-30 Thread Alan Horkan
ly Krayon, formerly KImageshop has been around for many years it has not been actively developed all that time and the maintainer describes it as still a young app with lots of work to do. I've really been wanting to give Krita try but I've had troubles getting it to build. Certainly worth

Re: [Gimp-developer] Layer locking proposal

2005-06-26 Thread Alan Horkan
r label into a Text Area instead of one line Text Entry might also help. Side scrolling can be annoying and if you have Layer preview thumbnails enabled (especially larger ones) there is quite a bit of dead space. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.c

Re: [Gimp-developer] pygimp on windows? success!

2005-06-24 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Great work! Seems like we will finally have pygimp 2.4 for GIMP 2.4 on each > of the officially supported platforms. Hm, how about letting > Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu die in favor of it? ;) The best thing about Script-Fu has been knowing it would be avail

Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting (fwd)

2005-06-24 Thread Alan Horkan
To: Nathan Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting > I've used plenty of applications where the Windows menu does > double-duty, with the kinds of windows that can be opened, followed by > a separator, followed by the current open windows. Come to think of

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Horkan
elf -- complain more or less vociferously about this, > for what appears to be more or less the same reason. Alan Horkan > appears to have at least some complaints about it, I do not disagree with Sven on this. Please do not count me in on this arguement, I probably should not have commente

Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:14:55 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: The GNU Image Manipulation Program > > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting &

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-22 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:32:11 -0400 > From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of > GIMP > >From:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting

2005-06-22 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Akkana Peck wrote: > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:38:36 -0700 > From: Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Integrated Scripting > > Nathan Summers writes: > > On 6/21/05, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

[Gimp-developer] GIMP is not a GNOME application

2005-06-18 Thread Alan Horkan
he said "GIMP is not a GNOME application" he was describing it from a strict technical point of view and did not mean to distance the GIMP from the wider Gnome community which unfortunately was the impression I got in the past and one I think others might have also mistakenly gotten too. Si

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Alan Horkan
cations and help leave the choice of toolkits to the developers. If you are interested in looking into it futher here is their website: http://metatheme.advel.cz/ Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Dia http://gnome.org/projects/dia/ Open Clip Ar

[Gimp-developer] Script Fu and stuff [was Re: Akanna Menu patch]

2005-06-10 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Kevin Cozens wrote: > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:57:50 -0400 > From: Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-devel > Subject: Re: Akanna Menu patch [was Re: [Gimp-developer] The GUADEC > meeting] > > Alan Horkan wrote: > > >

[OT] RE: [Gimp-developer] Re: Akanna Menu patch

2005-06-10 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Phil Lello wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:48:29 +0100 > From: Phil Lello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: RE: [Gimp-developer] Re: Akanna Menu patch > And of course, not everyone has a right mouse button... or do new > Macs have mo

[Gimp-developer] Re: Akkana Menu patch

2005-06-07 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Akkana Peck wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:20:21 -0700 > From: Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: The GNU Image Manipulation Program > > Subject: Re: Akkana Menu patch [was Re: [Gimp-developer] The GUADEC > meeting] > > Alan Horkan

Re: Akanna Menu patch [was Re: [Gimp-developer] The GUADEC meeting]

2005-06-07 Thread Alan Horkan
ems but not the proposed implementation. The way many other Gnome and GTK give the information applications do is to show a description of a menu item in the status bar. Perhaps the existing short description/summary/blurb in most plugins could potentially be repurposed for thi

Akanna Menu patch [was Re: [Gimp-developer] The GUADEC meeting]

2005-06-07 Thread Alan Horkan
tten in a different language) plugin written . One possible way to disambiguate similar plugins might be to give them different menu icons but expect you can probably come up with something better than that. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ __

Re: [Gimp-developer] Apply palette to image colormap

2005-06-02 Thread Alan Horkan
> And... it is buggy. It failed me when applying 256 color palette to a > 256 colro image with the message: > --- > Error while executing > (tiny-fu-set-cmap 6 12 "Gold") > > Error: car: argument 1 must be: pair > -- > Not to mention: > > WARNING: Plug-In "tiny-fu" > (/usr/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug

Reply to Considered Harmful [Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp server startup [OT]]

2005-06-01 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:48:58 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp server startup [OT] > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > > This is inten

Re: [Gimp-developer] Idea for new plugin

2005-05-24 Thread Alan Horkan
n using the Perspective tool to invert and distort or rotate the selection as desired. It should be possible to automate the process using a script or a plug-in if a programmer was interested enough to do it. Sincerely Alan Horkan Inkscape http://inkscape.org Abiword http://www.abisource.com Dia ht

[Gimp-developer] use stock gtk about dialog in plugins?

2005-05-20 Thread Alan Horkan
I was looking at version 2.3 and was pleased to notice lots of little details that have been polished or tweaked. For no particular reason I noticed some of the plugins have an About dialog and since the GIMP requires gtk 2.6 I started about getting them to use the GTK_STOCK_ABOUT button and the

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Inkscape-devel] common interface for graphics apps on the"free desktop"

2005-02-03 Thread Alan Horkan
eeded as they need to be compact and are quite different from the standard transient dialogs described by the current guidelines. > Sorry for cross posting, but I hope to initiate some discussion among > both camps. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ (Feel free

Re: [Gimp-developer] xtns->extras ?

2005-01-23 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:50:27 -0200 > From: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Gimp-developer] xtns->extras ? > > Hi, > > a few weeks ago I wrote mentioning that it mig

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-05 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, William Skaggs wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800 > From: William Skaggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Cc: @mail.primate.ucdavis.edu > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary > > > Robert Krawitz wrote: > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:26:37 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:06:21 -0800 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:51:34 -0800 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be con

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
The bug report in question was http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160890 I got the name wrong in the message body but it was correct in the message title. > > On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote: > >> I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being > >>

Re: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:51:44 -0800 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash > > hi, > > i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any > w

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, David [iso-8859-15] Gómez wrote: > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:19:26 +0100 > From: "David [iso-8859-15] Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-de

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
not allow the name to be configurable? > >From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100 > >Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have to ask why reject such patches? > >> Because IMO the name is important. If we

Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Horkan
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? > > Hi, > > Alan Hor

[Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable? [was [Bug 160890] Change Gimp name (fwd)]

2004-12-12 Thread Alan Horkan
son to reject patches that would make it easier to get more people to use Free Software? If a project as big as Mozilla Firefox allows it name to be changed, why would it be an issue for the gimp? Why require people to fork or maintain their own patchsets for the sake of a little extra

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: whishes for Gimp

2004-11-18 Thread Alan Horkan
ourself if you try one of the version 2.2 prereleases. Go to File, Dialogs, Tools, and if you have an up to date version there will be an 'eye' icon next to each tool allowing you to show/hide whatever tools you want. Sven's point still stands though, adding more tools to the defa

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparing gimp speed

2004-11-16 Thread Alan Horkan
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:07:31 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] comparing gimp speed > > Hi, > > while we are discussing this. Would anyone object if we changed the > default tile cac

Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote: > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:28:44 +0100 > From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options] > > O

new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:13 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote: > Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:41:18 +0100 > From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > Hi all. > > Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > &g

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-13 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:42:42 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-12 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:49:26 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-12 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jakub Friedl (lists) wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:57:51 +0100 > From: "Jakub Friedl (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-12 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:39:58 +0100 > From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > Hi, > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-12 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:02:31 +0100 > From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004

[Gimp-developer] canvas background options

2004-11-11 Thread Alan Horkan
desktop theme). Is this feature really important to some users, so much so that it needs menu items? I am suggesting it would be better to put this in the preferences if at all rather than cluttering the menus. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ Inkscape, Draw Freely

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-11 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, David Neary wrote: > Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:36:18 +0100 > From: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in > me

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-11 Thread Alan Horkan
Miriam > okay... since i'm in the Hotel California where you can check in but > never check out Sorry that the you were unable to unsubscribe, I have no idea why the unsubscribe system didn't work for you but I'm pretty sure the developers were joking and that if you are still unable to uns

[Offtopic] Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-11 Thread Alan Horkan
tor. I'd very much > like to report these experiences to their list and see how they are > tackling them. The Inkscape developers would definately like to hear your opinions and are willing to ajust things to accomdate Illustrator users (up to a point) as things are being cha

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-11 Thread Alan Horkan
se the Photoshop shortcuts). If there is enough interest I will try and dig out my modified version later this week, I might have to forward port the changes to gimp 2.0. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ Inkscape, Draw Freely http://inkscape.org Free SVG Clip Art htt

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-10 Thread Alan Horkan
Image/Path/Pattern/...] I agree that it would help if the scripts were moved to elsewhere in the menus, but I reiterate my point that I do not think they do not belong in the Select menu. Sincerely Alan Horkan http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/ Inkscape, Draw Freely http://inkscape.o

Re: [Gimp-developer] Dialog layouts in 2.2pre1

2004-11-05 Thread Alan Horkan
> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 17:00:30 + > From: Keith Goatman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gimp-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Dialog layouts in 2.2pre1 > > Sven Neumann wrote: > > Despite the fact that it has a sane API (which the old widgets didn't > > have), it also has

"Do what I mean" [was RE: [Gimp-developer] first impressions of GIMP 2.0]

2004-10-31 Thread Alan Horkan
Would you like to Add Alpha? [ Close ] [ Add Alpha] I looked at a few other greyed out menu items that could potentially be reenabled: "Select Invert" when there is no selection; Engrave plug-in seems to be disabled on layers that do not have an alpha channel. Maybe there is not an

[Gimp-developer] directory organisation [was Re: [Gimp-user] Installing plug-ins (fwd)]

2004-10-28 Thread Alan Horkan
future have something like this? ~/.gimp/2.2 ~/.gimp/3.0 (I'll file a bug report and try and make a patch if this idea is deemed acceptable) Sincerely Alan Horkan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:14:22 +0200 From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: C

Re: [Gimp-developer] first impressions of GIMP 2.0

2004-10-26 Thread Alan Horkan
x27;d love to see is drag and drop from one image to > > another. I use this frequently, rather than cutting and pasting > > layers. > > You can drag and drop from the layers dialog, even between two layer > dialogs. There's a lot to drag and drop in GIMP and also between G

Re: [Gimp-developer] first impressions of GIMP 2.0

2004-10-26 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Gezim Hoxha wrote: > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT) > From: Gezim Hoxha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], gimp dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] first impressions of GIMP 2.0 > > One of the tools that I absolutely love is the > "d

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp GUI

2004-10-25 Thread Alan Horkan
eme/script-fu version called 'webotine' which is great if you want to have the same version on both windows and linux. http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=2821 -- Alan Horkan ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp GUI

2004-10-25 Thread Alan Horkan
come an essential on Winblows > machines also. I'm surprised you have not mentioned Mac OS X which has much of the tools that graphic designers and desktop publishers love and has versions of free software like the gimp available for it (although not as perfectly b

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: New Image dialog usability bug

2004-09-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Danni Coy wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:36:07 +1000 > From: Danni Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Gimp-developer] Re: New Image dialog usability bug > > Why not have the entries for size have drop down menus allowing the user to > select the l

Re: [Gimp-developer] on splitting things off

2004-09-09 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Carol Spears wrote: > Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:02:16 -0700 > From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] on splitting things off > > hello, > my experience with gimp is diffe

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.2 and Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu.

2004-09-08 Thread Alan Horkan
> On another note, I'm not sure this is a desirable goal. splitting > stuff off feels an awful lot like putting it out to pasture. The that does seem like a valid risk to consider > goal of just having the core application, with no plug-ins, no > image data structures, no scripts, and a minimum

  1   2   >