Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39369) typing mistake in file data/stdsounds.soundspec
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39369 > The same issue still applies to S2_1 and S2_2 -- any chance of porting the typo fix? With 2.1.6, gives the following message (search fodder): 1: Cannot find audio file stdounds/MgBar1.ogg ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40510) Bug: ZOC for RIP players
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40510 > Hi, I'm playing Freeciv 2.1.3, and I've noticed that territory that belonged to a player who's now RIP still belongs to that player. I had to 'cancel treaty' to move bombers over that territory. Also, my cities cannot use such land for resources. That player (vietnamese) was spawned halfway through the game after I conquered a capital, maybe that will help narrow it down. thanks, Chris Hi,I'm playing Freeciv 2.1.3, and I've noticed that territory that belonged to a player who's now RIP still belongs to that player. I had to 'cancel treaty' to move bombers over that territory. Also, my cities cannot use such land for resources.That player (vietnamese) was spawned halfway through the game after I conquered a capital, maybe that will help narrow it down.thanks,Chris ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40445) Compile error with --enable-debug=yes (freeciv 2.1.6)
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40445 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I just tried to compile the new freeciv 2.1.6 with --enable-debug=yes, but unfortunately I get this compile error: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../utility -I./../common -I./../ai - -I../intl -I../common/aicore -I./generator -I./scripting - -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/share/locale\"" - -DDEFAULT_DATA_PATH="\".:data:~/.freeciv:/usr/local/share/freeciv\"" - -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes - -Wmissing-declarations -Werror -g -O2 -MT sernet.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/sernet.Tpo -c -o sernet.o sernet.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors sernet.c: In function ‘server_sniff_all_input’: sernet.c:714: error: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 4 has type ‘ssize_t’ sernet.c:714: error: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 5 has type ‘size_t’ make[3]: *** [sernet.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/tux-control/Desktop/freeciv-2.1.6/freeciv-2.1.6/server' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/tux-control/Desktop/freeciv-2.1.6/freeciv-2.1.6/server' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tux-control/Desktop/freeciv-2.1.6/freeciv-2.1.6' make: *** [all] Error 2 This problem can be fixed by changing line 714 in sernet.c to freelog(LOG_DEBUG, "Got line: \"%s\" (%ld, %ld)", buffer, (long int)didget, (long int)len); With this fix it compiles perfectly with --enable-debug=yes. Thanks for your work on freeciv! Tristan Hoffmann -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkin1C8ACgkQSufthXk+NIHX4wCeOsGD4MmJrYFy5mh1tQ6NuEcq KYwAn0KPuUwqN2vIfb4l4fpocR/a4pBf =6xVa -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40436) Cities not refreshed when crossing Empire_Size_Step
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40436 > If, during a turn, conquering or founding a city causes the empire to grow and every city to get an extra unhappy citizen due to Empire_Size_Step, it appears that the client's cities are not refreshed immediately; the unhappiness shows up when performing subsequent actions on the city, such as moving workers around or changing specialists. So those actions can appear to increase unhappiness, which is confusing. Saving, quitting, and restoring the savegame causes all cities to be up-to-date. (I think hitting "turn done" may have this effect also, but I haven't checked.) I guess the server needs to send city updates to client(s) when an Empire_Size_Step boundary is crossed, or something like that -- I haven't investigated the code. Seen in 2.1.4 and 2.1.6 (and one previous version I can't remember). (I idly wonder whether a message when the unhappiness penalty grows might not be a bad idea. I was rather confused why my empire was suddenly in uproar after moving from 2.0.x to 2.1.x.) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40412) Bug report
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40412 > Hi, every time I load saved game all AI players stops building all wonders if any are in progress. It happens every time and is easy to reproduce. Tried it with 2.1.4 and 2.1.5 versions which I downloaded from official site (GTK + client binary distribution). I run it under Windows XP SP3. Best regards Gintas Hi,every time I load saved game all AI players stops building all wonders if any are in progress. It happens every time and is easy to reproduce. Tried it with 2.1.4 and 2.1.5 versions which I downloaded from official site (GTK + client binary distribution). I run it under Windows XP SP3. Best regardsGintas ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40342)
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40342 > Hello: Ok, I already figured out that 'make distclean' and re-run autogen.sh will fix the compile errors. Although I have no idea what went wrong. So, I got SVN snapshot 1213/1216 to compile on both F8 and F9 Linux. Used GTK client on both. However, now the civserver on both seg-faults without comment immediately after the civclient issues the 'Start' game. Note that, although very similar in software selection, etc., these are two different OSs. Anything else I could/should try ? Regards, VJS = From: The default queue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2008/06/29 Sun AM 07:17:07 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#40342) AutoReply: Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#40342). Please include the string: (PR#40342) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40342)
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40342 > Hello: Updated branch S2_2 to SVN 14910 today, and despite many different configurations, it now fails to compile, always exiting at the same place with same message: [...] make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2/common/aicore' make[4]: Entering directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2/common' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../utility -I./aicore -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt/share/locale\"" -DDEFAULT_DATA_PATH="\".:data:~/.freeciv:/opt/share/freeciv\"" -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -O3 -pipe -m32 -MT base.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/base.Tpo -c -o base.o base.c mv -f .deps/base.Tpo .deps/base.Po gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../utility -I./aicore -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt/share/locale\"" -DDEFAULT_DATA_PATH="\".:data:~/.freeciv:/opt/share/freeciv\"" -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -O3 -pipe -m32 -MT capstr.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/capstr.Tpo -c -o capstr.o capstr.c In file included from capstr.c:23: capstr.h:16:1: warning: "NETWORK_CAPSTRING" redefined In file included from capstr.c:15: ../config.h:364:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition capstr.c: In function ‘init_our_capability’: capstr.c:84: error: ‘NETWORK_CAPSTRING_MANDATORY’ undeclared (first use in this function) capstr.c:84: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once capstr.c:84: error: for each function it appears in.) capstr.c:84: error: expected ‘)’ before string constant make[4]: *** [capstr.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2/common' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2/common' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2/common' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Shared/Linux_Source_Code-Binaries/freeciv-2.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 [END] Last successful compile was with SVN 14806. Regards, VJS "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39982) Wonder Report does not mark obsolete Wonders
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39982 > I'd quite like to get this patch committed on S2_1 for the next 2.1.x release. It fixes a fairly obvious bug, and I've been running with it since 2.1.3 and haven't spotted any problems. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40207) [PATCH] Should cities with Supermarket automatically get farmland benefit?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40207 >
Here's a new patch which is functionally equivalent to my previous one
but includes Madeline's suggestion:
- rename "tile" to "dummy_tile" throughout
and also includes the more controversial changes mentioned previously,
such that I'm not sure whether or not it improves the chances of my
patch being incorporated. Take your pick ;)
- introduce and use a const p_dummy_tile; this attempts to mitigate the
pointer aliasing introduced by my change, but the result looks a
little awkward;
- use the standard tile_has_special() function and the like instead of
the current approach of reaching inside "struct tile", at the
potential run-time cost of introducing function calls.
--- freeciv-2.1.4-orig/common/city.c2008-04-21 01:10:49.0 +0100
+++ freeciv-2.1.4/common/city.c 2008-05-03 12:57:03.0 +0100
@@ -607,9 +607,11 @@
int city_x, int city_y, bool is_celebrating,
Output_type_id otype)
{
- struct tile tile;
+ /* temporary dummy tile for city center bonuses */
+ struct tile dummy_tile = *ptile;
+ const struct tile *p_dummy_tile = &dummy_tile;
int prod;
- struct terrain *pterrain = tile_get_terrain(ptile);
+ struct terrain *pterrain = tile_get_terrain(p_dummy_tile);
assert(otype >= 0 && otype < O_LAST);
@@ -620,41 +622,40 @@
}
prod = pterrain->output[otype];
- if (tile_resource_is_valid(ptile)) {
-prod += tile_get_resource(ptile)->output[otype];
+ if (tile_resource_is_valid(p_dummy_tile)) {
+prod += tile_get_resource(p_dummy_tile)->output[otype];
}
- /* create dummy tile which has the city center bonuses. */
- tile.terrain = pterrain;
- tile.special = tile_get_special(ptile);
-
+ /* add city center bonuses to temporary copy of tile. */
if (pcity && is_city_center(city_x, city_y)
&& pterrain == pterrain->irrigation_result
&& terrain_control.may_irrigate) {
-/* The center tile is auto-irrigated. */
-tile_set_special(&tile, S_IRRIGATION);
+/* The center tile is auto-irrigated, for the purposes of food
+ * production. */
+tile_set_special(&dummy_tile, S_IRRIGATION);
if (player_knows_techs_with_flag(city_owner(pcity), TF_FARMLAND)) {
- tile_set_special(&tile, S_FARMLAND);
+ tile_set_special(&dummy_tile, S_FARMLAND);
}
}
switch (otype) {
case O_SHIELD:
-if (contains_special(tile.special, S_MINE)) {
+if (tile_has_special(p_dummy_tile, S_MINE)) {
prod += pterrain->mining_shield_incr;
}
break;
case O_FOOD:
-if (contains_special(tile.special, S_IRRIGATION)) {
+if (tile_has_special(p_dummy_tile, S_IRRIGATION)) {
prod += pterrain->irrigation_food_incr;
}
break;
case O_TRADE:
-if (contains_special(tile.special, S_RIVER) && !is_ocean(tile.terrain)) {
+if (tile_has_special(p_dummy_tile, S_RIVER) &&
+!is_ocean(tile_get_terrain(p_dummy_tile))) {
prod += terrain_control.river_trade_incr;
}
-if (contains_special(tile.special, S_ROAD)) {
+if (tile_has_special(p_dummy_tile, S_ROAD)) {
prod += pterrain->road_trade_incr;
}
break;
@@ -665,28 +666,29 @@
break;
}
- if (contains_special(tile.special, S_RAILROAD)) {
+ if (tile_has_special(p_dummy_tile, S_RAILROAD)) {
prod += (prod * terrain_control.rail_tile_bonus[otype]) / 100;
}
if (pcity) {
const struct output_type *output = &output_types[otype];
-prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, p_dummy_tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_ADD_TILE);
if (prod > 0) {
- int penalty_limit = get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
- EFT_OUTPUT_PENALTY_TILE);
+ int penalty_limit = get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, p_dummy_tile,
+ output,
+ EFT_OUTPUT_PENALTY_TILE);
if (is_celebrating) {
-prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, p_dummy_tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_INC_TILE_CELEBRATE);
penalty_limit = 0; /* no penalty if celebrating */
}
- prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+ prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, p_dummy_tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_INC_TILE);
prod += (prod
- * get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+ * get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, p_dummy_tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_PER_TILE))
/ 100;
if (!is_celebrating && penalty_limit > 0 && prod > penalty_limit) {
@@ -695,11 +697,11 @@
}
}
- if
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40207) Should cities with Supermarket automatically get farmland benefit?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40207 > > By doing a full struct copy you alias pointers in the original > tile. This is generally a bad idea, Indeed, it makes me cringe, but... > though it looks like it > will not have any unfortunate consequences in this case so long > as all functions using the dummy tile respect its "constness" > (and do not modify its member pointers). It's hard to see how any function that is likely to ever be called by this function would need to modify the tile it's passed. I have perpetrated a certain loss of const-ness within the function -- the compiler will no longer warn if &tile is passed to a function which doesn't promise to treat it as const. It would be possible to create a "const struct tile *p_dummy_tile = &dummy_tile" and passing it where possible to restore this property. Is that worth doing? > While you are modifying references to 'tile' I would change > the name to 'dummy' or 'dummy_tile' since 'struct tile tile' > is an eyesore and "dummy" would clearly mark its purpose > in the code. Fair. It would also be possible to replace the direct contains_special() calls with calls to the standard tile_has_special() (at the run-time cost of adding some function calls). ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40207) [PATCH] Should cities with Supermarket automatically get farmland benefit?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40207 >
Since at least one other person seems to think it's a real bug, I've
investigated further.
Looking further down the function, it becomes obvious why the temporary
setting of S_FARMLAND isn't having any effect while S_IRRIGATION is: the
effects of irrigation are "built-in" and the checking code uses the
dummy "tile" with the extra specials, whereas farmland is implemented
through the effects system, and it's the original "ptile" that gets
passed into that. So presumably this change was introduced whenever the
effects system came in.
To fix this, it's not safe to just pass "tile" as it stands into the
bowels of the effects system, since parts of that can access members of
"tile" that haven't been initialised. However, I can't see any downside
to making "tile" into a full copy of *ptile then passing that around,
since nothing called from here should be modifying *ptile or any of its
descendants.
The attached patch implements this. (I had to bracket a macro argument
in a header file as well.) It fixes the bug, and hasn't obviously messed
anything else up.
diff -uNr freeciv-2.1.4-orig/common/city.c freeciv-2.1.4/common/city.c
--- freeciv-2.1.4-orig/common/city.c2008-04-21 01:10:49.0 +0100
+++ freeciv-2.1.4/common/city.c 2008-04-26 21:27:50.0 +0100
@@ -607,9 +607,10 @@
int city_x, int city_y, bool is_celebrating,
Output_type_id otype)
{
- struct tile tile;
+ /* temporary dummy tile for city center bonuses */
+ struct tile tile = *ptile;
int prod;
- struct terrain *pterrain = tile_get_terrain(ptile);
+ struct terrain *pterrain = tile_get_terrain(&tile);
assert(otype >= 0 && otype < O_LAST);
@@ -620,18 +621,16 @@
}
prod = pterrain->output[otype];
- if (tile_resource_is_valid(ptile)) {
-prod += tile_get_resource(ptile)->output[otype];
+ if (tile_resource_is_valid(&tile)) {
+prod += tile_get_resource(&tile)->output[otype];
}
- /* create dummy tile which has the city center bonuses. */
- tile.terrain = pterrain;
- tile.special = tile_get_special(ptile);
-
+ /* add city center bonuses to temporary copy of tile. */
if (pcity && is_city_center(city_x, city_y)
&& pterrain == pterrain->irrigation_result
&& terrain_control.may_irrigate) {
-/* The center tile is auto-irrigated. */
+/* The center tile is auto-irrigated, for the purposes of food
+ * production. */
tile_set_special(&tile, S_IRRIGATION);
if (player_knows_techs_with_flag(city_owner(pcity), TF_FARMLAND)) {
@@ -672,21 +671,21 @@
if (pcity) {
const struct output_type *output = &output_types[otype];
-prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, &tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_ADD_TILE);
if (prod > 0) {
- int penalty_limit = get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+ int penalty_limit = get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, &tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_PENALTY_TILE);
if (is_celebrating) {
-prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, &tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_INC_TILE_CELEBRATE);
penalty_limit = 0; /* no penalty if celebrating */
}
- prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+ prod += get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, &tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_INC_TILE);
prod += (prod
- * get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, ptile, output,
+ * get_city_tile_output_bonus(pcity, &tile, output,
EFT_OUTPUT_PER_TILE))
/ 100;
if (!is_celebrating && penalty_limit > 0 && prod > penalty_limit) {
diff -uNr freeciv-2.1.4-orig/common/tile.h freeciv-2.1.4/common/tile.h
--- freeciv-2.1.4-orig/common/tile.h2008-04-21 01:10:49.0 +0100
+++ freeciv-2.1.4/common/tile.h 2008-04-26 21:27:48.0 +0100
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
void tile_clear_special(struct tile *ptile, enum tile_special_type spe);
void tile_clear_all_specials(struct tile *ptile);
-#define tile_resource_is_valid(vtile) BV_ISSET(vtile->special,
S_RESOURCE_VALID)
+#define tile_resource_is_valid(vtile) BV_ISSET((vtile)->special,
S_RESOURCE_VALID)
const struct resource *tile_get_resource(const struct tile *ptile);
void tile_set_resource(struct tile *ptile, struct resource *presource);
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40207) Should cities with Supermarket automatically get farmland benefit?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40207 >
Should the tile on which a city with a Supermarket sits automatically
get the benefit of farmland, similar to auto-irrigation?
Currently (2.1.3), I'm sure it doesn't -- I have to irrigate a city tile
twice in order to see an increase in food output once I've built a
Supermarket.
I found this code in common/city.c:base_get_output_tile(), which seems
to indicate that the _intention_ was to give the city tile the benefit
of farmland. I haven't worked out why it's seemingly having no effect,
when all the other code nearby appears to be effective.
if (pcity && is_city_center(city_x, city_y)
&& pterrain == pterrain->irrigation_result
&& terrain_control.may_irrigate) {
/* The center tile is auto-irrigated. */
tile_set_special(&tile, S_IRRIGATION);
if (player_knows_techs_with_flag(city_owner(pcity), TF_FARMLAND)) {
tile_set_special(&tile, S_FARMLAND);
}
}
The Wiki claimed that this did happen, until I edited it recently:
However, I find that I'm also the source for the original assertion:
which suggests that the game behaviour has changed since 2005 (although
I have no recollection of this).
What's the correct behaviour here?
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Fwd: (PR#39821) Global Lists Bug... Can't Add to top of list?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39821 > Hi! Don't worry, thanks for the patch(es)! =) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Ulrik Sverdrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39821) Global Lists Bug... Can't Add to top of list? Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:58:28 -0700 http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39821 > Sorry for the spam, Core. I was trying to send this to the list. I really have to learn some things about operating email... Here is an email I *should* have sent to the bugtracker yesterday. Ulrik -- Forwarded message ------ From: Ulrik Sverdrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 10.04.2008 21:55 Subject: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39821) Global Lists Bug... Can't Add to top of list? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/4/10, Ulrik Sverdrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39821 > > > > The worklist editor assumes that if ptr->pcity is NULL, you can't edit > the worklist. This reverses that to allow the global worklist editor > to enable all buttons. > > The original reporter only mentions the prepend button but the append > button should also have been affected. > > Attached simple patches to trunk and 21 branches that fix this by > modifying the sensitivity check. > > Old check: > client can issue commands AND pcity not NULL AND player owns pcity > New check > client can issue commands AND ( (pcity not NULL AND player owns pcity) > OR pcity is NULL) > > The "extra" null check is so that we don't get a crash on looking up > an owner for city NULL, of course. > > Can someone test this? I can't find any other case than the global > worklist editor where pcity is NULL. > > Ulrik > Always embarrassing to send something twice. Staring at the logic above long enough, you'll see that it's simpler to write the conditional as in this patch, taking advantage of course of C's cross-circuiting rules. Ulrik ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40171) similar bug with Select -> CMA -> Custom
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40171 >
I explored the code more and it paid off. Similar bug exists when doing
Select -> CMA -> Custom, and there is at least one city under custom CMA. The
solution is to also test idx != CMA_CUSTOM, so that we don't call
cmafec_preset_get_parameter(CMA_CUSTOM).
It is correct because if the first test:
if (idx == CMA_CUSTOM && controlled
&& cmafec_preset_get_index_of_parameter(¶meter) == -1) {
fails, we know that pcity isn't under custom CMA.
I attach a patch against version 2.1.3.
There are only 2 exceptions (CMA_NONE and CMA_CUSTOM), so when both are taken
into account, it should work (here i am only talking about passing bad params
to cmafec_preset_get_parameter).
--- client/gui-gtk-2.0/cityrep.c.orig 2008-03-23 21:28:50.0 +
+++ client/gui-gtk-2.0/cityrep.c 2008-03-29 13:53:56.0 +
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
select = TRUE;
} else if (idx == CMA_NONE && !controlled) {
select = TRUE;
- } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled &&
+ } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled && idx != CMA_NONE && idx != CMA_CUSTOM &&
cm_are_parameter_equal(¶meter,
cmafec_preset_get_parameter(idx))) {
select = TRUE;
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40171) bug in gtk client - select CMA none
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40171 >
in freeciv version 2.1.3, gtk-2.0 client, in city report screen:
when I do "Select -> Cityzen Governor -> none" and there is at least one city
with CMA active, then the client crashes on a failed assertion:
civclient: cma_fec.c:178: cmafec_preset_get_parameter: Assertion `index >= 0
&& index < cmafec_preset_num()' failed.
This is because cmafec_preset_get_parameter gets CMA_NONE as an argument.
It can be fixed by testing idx != CMA_NONE before calling
cmafec_preset_get_parameter. It is correct because if the city is
CMA-controlled (controlled !=0) and we are selecting non-controlled cities
(idx == CMA_NONE), then we shouldn't select the city under consideration
(select = FALSE).
I attach a log of gdb session (gdb.log) which shows the problem and a fix
(fix-client-CMA-select-none.diff).
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 0xb729c940 (LWP 12131)]
0xb7f88410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7f88410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb759df15 in raise () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb759f891 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0xb75970ee in __assert_fail () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#4 0x080fa0fb in cmafec_preset_get_parameter (index=1) at cma_fec.c:178
#5 0x081046d5 in select_cma_callback (w=0x9082258, data=0x2710)
at cityrep.c:508
#6 0xb78de9bf in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID ()
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 0xb78d16f9 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 0xb78e5c3d in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 0x096ae7b0 in ?? ()
#10 0x in ?? ()
(gdb) fr 4
#4 0x080fa0fb in cmafec_preset_get_parameter (index=1) at cma_fec.c:178
178 assert(index >= 0 && index < cmafec_preset_num());
(gdb) p index
$1 = 1
(gdb) up
#5 0x081046d5 in select_cma_callback (w=0x9082258, data=0x2710)
at cityrep.c:508
508 } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled &&
(gdb) l
503 if (idx == CMA_CUSTOM && controlled
504 && cmafec_preset_get_index_of_parameter(¶meter) == -1) {
505 select = TRUE;
506 } else if (idx == CMA_NONE && !controlled) {
507 select = TRUE;
508 } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled &&
509 cm_are_parameter_equal(¶meter,
510 cmafec_preset_get_parameter(idx))) {
511 select = TRUE;
512 }
(gdb) p controlled
$2 = 0
(gdb) quit
--- client/gui-gtk-2.0/cityrep.c 2008-03-23 21:19:32.0 +
+++ client/gui-gtk-2.0/cityrep.c.orig 2008-01-23 11:18:53.0 +
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
select = TRUE;
} else if (idx == CMA_NONE && !controlled) {
select = TRUE;
- } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled && idx != CMA_NONE &&
+ } else if (idx >= 0 && controlled &&
cm_are_parameter_equal(¶meter,
cmafec_preset_get_parameter(idx))) {
select = TRUE;
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40050) RE: FreeCic-2.1.3 client crash
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40050 > Hello: Just upgraded to FreeCiv-2.1.3 and civclient crashes with following message to stdout: [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ civclient -d 3 --tiles default [...] 3: The tileset doesn't specify prefered themes or none of prefered themes can be used. Using system default Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [...] FreeCiv-2.1.3 w/default GTK client compiled from source code with no known warnings or errors of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Configure options used: CFLAGS="-O -g -pipe" ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-nls --with-gettext uname -a: Linux presario.localdomain 2.6.23.14-60.fc7 #1 SMP Mon Jan 14 22:14:17 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux gcc-4.1.2-27.fc7 (has worked flawlessly with all FreeCiv-2.1.x releases to date). Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: Just upgraded to FreeCiv-2.1.3 and civclient crashes with following message to stdout: [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ civclient -d 3 --tiles default [...] 3: The tileset doesn't specify prefered themes or none of prefered themes can be used. Using system default Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [...] FreeCiv-2.1.3 w/default GTK client compiled from source code with no known warnings or errors of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Configure options used: CFLAGS="-O -g -pipe" ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-nls --with-gettext uname -a: Linux presario.localdomain 2.6.23.14-60.fc7 #1 SMP Mon Jan 14 22:14:17 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux gcc-4.1.2-27.fc7 (has worked flawlessly with all FreeCiv-2.1.x releases to date). Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#28092) server found_new_tech => notify_team crash
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=28092 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I haven't noticed this bug lately, so I think it's fixed. Thanks for your work on Freeciv! Tristan Hoffmann William Allen Simpson wrote: | http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=28092 > | | Both reports were for 64-bit Linux flavors. So anybody using such a | machine can tell us whether this is fixed? | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHkgdVSufthXk+NIERAnMAAJ9hlAKqiEcc1V40hui8Glz0B5rI2gCggib7 SVaXIfVRzuK30Tm9z/TdlS4= =y15Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40023) Feature Request: add more switches to slow_down_timeline
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40023 > Hello: I'm getting copies of these e-mails between you guys, which seems good, but since the guest login is disabled at the bug report site, I have no way of knowing what you're referring to - I cannot find or view these other "tickets" and the links all take me to that same login page - unless I'm missing something obvious. Similarly, it seems impossible to do any kind of check before submitting to find out if a bug/feature request has already been submitted. So, is there any way for an ordinary user/guest to have a look-see at those "tickets" or do a search before submitting? Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeCiv-2.1.2 compiled from source code without warnings or errors of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. William Allen Simpson wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40023 > > > Egor Vyscrebentsov wrote: > >> Any opinions about http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1871 ? >> >> > I'm more in favor of http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39413 > > I think Ulrik had some good ideas. But there was an executive decision > not to add it in 2.1, and I'm not sure 2.2 will be ready for it > > Remember, the only features for 2.2 are the editor and new terrain. There > are a few other things already added, such as generalized bases, but mostly > there's a lot of bugfixes, cleanup, and error logging (to find more bugs). > > I'm hoping that once 2.2 is released, we can add import to 2.3 (and helpful > update of translation and graphics, just like 2.1). Having the editor in > place will greatly aid testing the success of importing. > > My preference would be to have actual Civ1/2/3 and AlphaCentauri savegames > for targets, and implement and test against them extensively. We also need > to test popular scenarios and modpacks, to ensure they work harmoniously. > > Now is not a good time to add anything new, as the current features of 2.1 > (and thus 2.2) still crash regularly! Let's get the noise level down first, > so this is actually "stable". > > Hopefully, the project learned something from the battlegroup/goto/etc. > disaster that was 2.1 We still don't have all clients working for all > the *standard* tilesets (an official purpose of 2.1)! > > > > -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: I'm getting copies of these e-mails between you guys, which seems good, but since the guest login is disabled at the bug report site, I have no way of knowing what you're referring to - I cannot find or view these other "tickets" and the links all take me to that same login page - unless I'm missing something obvious. Similarly, it seems impossible to do any kind of check before submitting to find out if a bug/feature request has already been submitted. So, is there any way for an ordinary user/guest to have a look-see at those "tickets" or do a search before submitting? Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeCiv-2.1.2 compiled from source code without warnings or errors of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. William Allen Simpson wrote: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40023 > Egor Vyscrebentsov wrote: Any opinions about http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1871 ? I'm more in favor of http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39413 I think Ulrik had some good ideas. But there was an executive decision not to add it in 2.1, and I'm not sure 2.2 will be ready for it Remember, the only features for 2.2 are the editor and new terrain. There are a few other things already added, such as generalized bases, but mostly there's a lot of bugfixes, cleanup, and error logging (to find more bugs). I'm hoping that once 2.2 is released, we can add import to 2.3 (and helpful update of translation and graphics, just like 2.1). Having the editor in place will greatly aid testing the success of importing. My preference would be to have actual Civ1/2/3 and AlphaCentauri savegames for targets, and implement and test against them extensively. We also need to test popular scenarios and modpacks, to ensure they work harmoniously. Now is not a good time to add anything new, as the current features of 2.1 (and thus 2.2) still crash regularly! Let's get the noise level down first, so this is actually "stable". Hopefully, the project learned something from the battlegroup/goto/etc. disaster that was 2.1 We still don't have all clients working for all the *standard* tilesets (an official purpose of 2.1)! -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40024) Re: freeciv losing server
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40024 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] freeciv-2.1.2]$ ./civ 2: No real audio plugin present. 2: Proceeding with sound support disabled 2: For sound support, install SDL_mixer 2: http://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/index.html 2: lost connection to server [EMAIL PROTECTED] freeciv-2.1.2]$ gdb server/civserver core GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.5-16.el5rh) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". /home/Tessa/Desktop/freeciv-2.1.2/core: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full No stack. (gdb) On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 02:50 -0500, Jason Dorje Short wrote: > On Jan 14, 2008 6:56 PM, Tess Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just installed freeciv from source using make && make install on a > > twin dual core opteron. (Tyan K8SE mobo (s2892 mobo), dual 285 cpus, 2Gb > > Reg.ECC RAM, NVidia 6800GT], running x86-64 SL5 (RHEL5). > > > > The program runs as far as the end of the first turn. When the button to > > complete the turn is pushed, or one attempts to build a city - the > > program crashes, and goes back to the start page. > > > > The error message is that the session has lost contact with the server. > > > > The program runs fine on a Tyan K8E (s2865 mobo) running an opteron 180 > > cpu, and using the i386 version of SL5. > > Odds are good this is a bug in freeciv brought out by your > architecture. But we need more information. When the server crashes, > can you get a backtrace? > > > ./civ > ... (server crashes on turn done, exit the client, there will be a > file left called core or core.*) > > gdb server/civserver core > > bt full > > Then copy the output from there and email it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -jason ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40023) Feature Request: add more switches to slow_down_timeline
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40023 > Hello: Please consider adding the following additional switches to the slow_down_timeline effect, for the purpose of making modpacks/scenarios: ¤ 25- or 20-year turn increments (or both); ¤ 10-year turn increments; ¤ 1-12 month increments. The current effects only allow 5-, 2- or 1-year increments, and since the game default is 50-year increments, using the effect is to practically bring the timeline to a screeching halt. Having these additional options would allow smoother transitions and more varied effects. I realize that FreeCiv is not CivII, and I don't really like to keep mentioning it, but CivII allowed setting of the turn increment to months, for the purpose of modpacks, and this feature was very nice for scenarios with a limited time scope, in order to get the desired number of turns into the game yet still have a realistic timeline. FreeCiv-2.1.2 compiled from source code without errors or warnings of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, Vince Schiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: Please consider adding the following additional switches to the slow_down_timeline effect, for the purpose of making modpacks/scenarios: ¤ 25- or 20-year turn increments (or both); ¤ 10-year turn increments; ¤ 1-12 month increments. The current effects only allow 5-, 2- or 1-year increments, and since the game default is 50-year increments, using the effect is to practically bring the timeline to a screeching halt. Having these additional options would allow smoother transitions and more varied effects. I realize that FreeCiv is not CivII, and I don't really like to keep mentioning it, but CivII allowed setting of the turn increment to months, for the purpose of modpacks, and this feature was very nice for scenarios with a limited time scope, in order to get the desired number of turns into the game yet still have a realistic timeline. FreeCiv-2.1.2 compiled from source code without errors or warnings of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, Vince Schiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40022) Diplomacy with dead AIs?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40022 > Hello: I was just informed that my cease-fire with the Phoenicians had expired, and that I was now at war with them - not a problem, they've been dead since the turn after I met them. Could you please look into this, and perhaps disable changes to the diplomatic state for dead players (at least AIs), since there's no way to negotiate with them? Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: I was just informed that my cease-fire with the Phoenicians had expired, and that I was now at war with them - not a problem, they've been dead since the turn after I met them. Could you please look into this, and perhaps disable changes to the diplomatic state for dead players (at least AIs), since there's no way to negotiate with them? Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > Perfect. :-) On Jan 14, 2008 10:46 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right. There you go. > > Joan > > 2008/1/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > > > On Jan 14, 2008 9:33 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, last patch (for now) for catalan.ruleset in 2.1. > > > > > > Basically, it's the same as the current ruleset, with no translatable > > > strings changed, and: > > >[...] > > > > It's almost perfect. You forgot to add " (ocean)" to both Guardamar > cities. :-) > > > > > > -- > > Miguel Farah > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40019) Feature Request: adjustable road movement multiplier
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40019 > Hello: REF: http://forum.freeciv.org/viewtopic.php?t=4113. Please consider making the road movement multiplier to be a ruleset-adjustable value, rather than hardcoded. This multiplier should probably affect river movement as well. I know that in Civ2, it could be changed in the rules.txt file. That was very convenient - it allowed finer tuning of unit movement rates for modpacks. For example, reducing the road movement multiplier to 2x or even 1x, and increasing terrain movement costs accordingly, you could have very slow units with only one move point, while still retaining the advantages of reduced movement for paved tiles (all movement between two tiles, both having roads, is reduced to 1/2 or 1, regardless of the underlying terrain move cost) and units with multiple movement points. And "rugged" terrain would still slow down most units. Or, you could speed things up by increasing the road movement multiplier to, say, 4x. Example: ruleset (effects.ruleset? game.ruleset? terrain.ruleset?) value of road movement multiplier (default 3) is changed to 1x for a modpack; terrain.ruleset is modified: flat terrain (grassland, plains, desert) move cost set to two, forest to 3-4, hills to 4, mountains/swamp/jungle to 5-6; units.ruleset is modified: slow units (slaves/workers, catapults) have one move point, standard units (most land units) have two move points, fast units have more (chariots and light/skirmishers 3, horsemen 4-5, etc.); across flat open terrain, then, any unit could move one tile, some two, others three (same as now); "rugged" terrain (forest, hills, etc.), however, would still slow down even fast-moving units (same as now) such that any land unit could only advance into only one mountain tile (same as now); on paved tiles however, some slow units would still only go one tile, most standard land units would now go two paved tiles, some fast units 3-4-5 or even more, as long as they stay on a road, and all regardless of the terrain type underlying the roads. As the rules stand, some units might be able to attack more than once - if they're very lucky and don't suffer much damage, and haven't moved yet. Now, they would have a much better chance of having one or more move points left after the first maneuver or attack to actually get in an extra attack at full strength (and therefore a reasonable chance of success), rather than being crippled by damage after the first charge (as is often now the case) or faced with only fractional move points remaining with which to attack, withdraw, or fortify. It is easy to see that the current movement scheme could be exactly duplicated by setting road multiplier to 1x, and simply increasing all unit move rates and terrain move costs by a factor of 3x; the only difference would then be that all units would automatically gain multiple-attack capability. In any case, it would be up to the modpack author to ensure that some units are flagged as "one attack per turn only" as desired (most standard land units currently fit this class, but do not require a flag to specify them as such). The game engine currently allows any unit with even a fractional movement point remaining, to move into another tile; it may be necessary to add a check to ensure that any unit, that can move at all, is allowed to move at least one tile per turn, regardless of the tile move cost. This change would have no direct effect on sea or air unit movement. Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: REF: http://forum.freeciv.org/viewtopic.php?t=4113. Please consider making the road movement multiplier to be a ruleset-adjustable value, rather than hardcoded. This multiplier should probably affect river movement as well. I know that in Civ2, it could be changed in the rules.txt file. That was very convenient - it allowed finer tuning of unit movement rates for modpacks. For example, reducing the road movement multiplier to 2x or even 1x, and increasing terrain movement costs accordingly, you could have very slow units with only one move point, while still retaining the advantages of reduced movement for paved tiles (all movement between two tiles, both having roads, is reduced to 1/2 or 1, regardless of the underlying terrain move cost) and units with multiple movement points. And "rugged" terrain would still slow down most units. Or, you could speed things up by increasing the road movement multiplier to, say, 4x. Example: ruleset (effects.ruleset? game.ruleset? terrain.ruleset?) value of road movement multiplier (default 3) is changed to 1x for a modpack; terrain.ruleset is modified: flat terrain (grassland, plains, desert) move cost set to two, forest to 3-4, hills to 4, mountains/swamp/jungle to 5-6; units.ruleset is modified: slow units (slaves/workers, catap
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 14, 2008 9:33 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, last patch (for now) for catalan.ruleset in 2.1. > > Basically, it's the same as the current ruleset, with no translatable > strings changed, and: >[...] It's almost perfect. You forgot to add " (ocean)" to both Guardamar cities. :-) -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40017) bug
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40017 > Hello I use freeciv-2.1.2-sdl client on windows XP SP2 Fall of program happend after: 1. start civserver 2. set aifill 30 3. start civclient 4. join game 5. start game 6. crash with this code in civclient.RPT --- Error occured on Monday, January 14, 2008 at 19:49:33. c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe caused an Access Violation at location 004c2dfc in module c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe Reading from location . Registers: eax= ebx=02061e28 ecx=03d53dc8 edx=0206a968 esi=0206a968 edi=0416e018 eip=004c2dfc esp=0022f990 ebp=0022f9b8 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs= efl=00210202 Call stack: 004C2DFC c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004C2DFC races_dialog_ok_callback x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/gui-sdl/dialogs.c:2211 004F1490 c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004F1490 widget_pressed_action x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/gui-sdl/widget.c:393 004ABE1A c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004ABE1A main_mouse_button_down_handler x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/gui-sdl/gui_main.c:351 004AC65C c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004AC65C gui_event_loop x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/gui-sdl/gui_main.c:711 004ACE8C c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004ACE8C ui_main x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/gui-sdl/gui_main.c:999 00406328 c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:00406328 SDL_main x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/client/civclient.c:404 0050C4FB c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:0050C4FB console_main /Users/hercules/trunk/SDL-1.2/./src/main/win32/SDL_win32_main.c:220 0050C6D9 c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:0050C6D9 WinMain /Users/hercules/trunk/SDL-1.2/./src/main/win32/SDL_win32_main.c:357 0050BF58 c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:0050BF58 units_have_activity_on_tile x:/Projekte/freeciv/src/build/freeciv-2.1.2-sdl/common/unitlist.c:194 0040124B c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:0040124B 004012B8 c:\Program Files\Freeciv-2.1.2-sdl\civclient.exe:004012B8 7C816FD7 C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll:7C816FD7 RegisterWaitForInputIdle --- When i try it againt it fall with same report. But all is OK after: 1. start civclient 2. start new game 3. set aifill 30 4. start game 5. all is fine Thanks for that game guys, next time i try to report patch(after understending of minGW)... ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40016) FreeCiv 2.1.2 crash - message pane
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40016 > Hello: civclient crashed with following error message to terminal when message in message pane was double-clicked after pressing "Turn Done" but before civclient had processed turn: [...] civclient: messagewin_common.c:165: get_message: Assertion `message_index >= 0 && message_index < messages_total' failed. Aborted [...] FreeCiv 2.1.2 (GTK client) compiled from source code without errors or warnings of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: civclient crashed with following error message to terminal when message in message pane was double-clicked after pressing "Turn Done" but before civclient had processed turn: [...] civclient: messagewin_common.c:165: get_message: Assertion `message_index >= 0 && message_index < messages_total' failed. Aborted [...] FreeCiv 2.1.2 (GTK client) compiled from source code without errors or warnings of any kind and running on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, VJSchiavoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40009) FreeCiv-2.1.2 crash/bug
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40009 > Hello: I've experienced this crash more than once now: it was early in the game, I gave my explorers the "Auto-Explore" order, set tech research/goal and city production, and didn't have much of anything to do for several turns except watch and hit "Turn Done". Suddenly, one of the explorers stopped, for no apparent reason, in the middle of nowhere, as if awaiting orders, like they do when they suddenly find themselves in neutral territory after a treaty. So, I simply gave it the "Auto-Explore" order again, and the civserver immediately crashed with this error message:* * "[...] civserver: unithand.c:612: handle_unit_change_activity: Assertion `punit->activity == ACTIVITY_EXPLORE' failed. Aborted [...]" I'm running FreeCiv 2.1.2 with the GTK client, compiled from source code with no known errors or warnings of any kind, on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, Vince -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 Hello: I've experienced this crash more than once now: it was early in the game, I gave my explorers the "Auto-Explore" order, set tech research/goal and city production, and didn't have much of anything to do for several turns except watch and hit "Turn Done". Suddenly, one of the explorers stopped, for no apparent reason, in the middle of nowhere, as if awaiting orders, like they do when they suddenly find themselves in neutral territory after a treaty. So, I simply gave it the "Auto-Explore" order again, and the civserver immediately crashed with this error message: "[...] civserver: unithand.c:612: handle_unit_change_activity: Assertion `punit->activity == ACTIVITY_EXPLORE' failed. Aborted [...]" I'm running FreeCiv 2.1.2 with the GTK client, compiled from source code with no known errors or warnings of any kind, on Fedora 7 Linux. Thanx and Regards, Vince -- "I may detest what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." EB Hall, "Friends of Voltaire", 1906 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 8, 2008 7:42 AM, Daniel Markstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Very enlightening discussion. Thanks everyone. > > I propose keeping the Catalan nation in its current "Països Catalans" > form while removing it from the 'medieval' group, leaving it simply > "European". > > Creating a 'cultural' group is a great idea - I'd like to introduce it > in 2.2 where we will have a lot more of this kind of nation in the > default ruleset. I concur. Your "cultural" group name is better than my "political" idea. -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 6, 2008 8:04 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[...] > I have also noticed that one of the cities in the catalan list is not really > Catalan. Tolosa (Toulouse, in its French name) was Occitan. Occitans and > Catalans were traditional allies, and there were lots of ties between the > two nations, but they never had the same ruler. In fact, Vielha is another > city of Occitan culture, but it has been administratively Catalan for > centuries, and now Catalan, Spanish and Occitan are spoken there. So, Vielha > stays. I concur. > > By the way, Occitania is another nation worth including in Freeciv: full of > legends about the Holy Grail; where troubadours flourished and spread the > Occitan poems all over Europe, ... How this never occured to me, I'll never understand. Joan, you're brighter than me. Let's work on it! When we're done, I'll make a campaign playing Occitania and Catalunya against the evil French! :-D -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 6, 2008 1:44 PM, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I understand. But... if we were to keep catalan.ruleset as medieval, > > it would necessarily refer to the Principality of Catalonia, so the only > > cities it could contain would be the ones from Catalonia proper, > > Catalonia Nord and perhaps the Franja Ponent (see my previous post). > > (heavy sigh) No, apparently you don't understand. We don't distinguish > between the Roman Republic and Empire, in our current rulesets. Yeah, I understand. The point is that the current catalan.ruleset contains cities that are not catalan (as in "part of Catalunya") and have never been so (cities from the Kingdom/Region/Autonomy of Valencia, etc.). They're there because they would form part of the "Països Catalans" that some catalan nationalists advocate. >[...] > Apparently, Valencians, Majorcans, Andorrans et alia "became" Catalan. And Not exactly. Catalans resettled Valencia and the Balearic Islands. So it's more like catalans became valencians and majorcans. > still speak something recognizably Catalan many hundreds of years later. > Not even the Roman Empire can claim that! > > Those cities belong. Not really... the disctintion between Catalonia and the concept of Països Catalans needs to be made. -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 6, 2008 2:27 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[...] > > > Right, let's forget about present-day politics or the whole thing will get > really complicated. History is what it is. Let's leave it like that. > > If everybody agrees, I'll add a couple Andorran cities to the ruleset. That > was a good idea. Did you see my proposed Andorran city list? -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 6, 2008 1:17 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > We basically agree. I think the key here is the definition of "medieval" and > "catalan". As I understand, "medieval" in Freeciv is used for "a nation that > existed at some time, but isn't independent nowadays". Since there isn't a > "cultural" category (after all, culture and language is what all these > cities have in common), "medieval" is the closest we have. > > And, indeed, during the Middle Ages these cities formed a nation (at least > culturally, and, to some degree, also politically). Sure, there are a few > cities in the ruleset that are not Catalan, but the King of the Crown of > Aragon, who happened to live in Barcelona, ruled them. And the language > spoken there is Catalan or some variant of it (I don't like the word > "dialect" because it implies some hierarchy among different variants) Er... that's kinda the point of contention: what exactly does catalan.ruleset represent? The Counties/Principality/Region/Autonomy of Catalonia, the crown of Aragon, or the Països Catalans? It's an important question to determine, because the ruleset name and the first few definition point towards the first, the "medieval" moniker points to the second, and the city list (as currently exists) points to the third, explicitly so. The city list would be pretty useful for a ruleset for the Crown of Aragon, provided that cities from Aragon (Kingdom/Region/Autonomy) are added (Huesca, Zaragoza, Teruel, Sos, Jaca, etcétera). BTW, I had an idea that might be good or might be utter crap. Joan rightly states that grouping the current catalan ruleset as "fictional", as I proposed, is too drastic. So, how about creating a new category, "political" or something like that, for rulesets that describe non-independent countries that some people/parties want to create? Països Catalans would be a natural fit for this, as would be a kurdistan ruleset. -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 >
On Jan 6, 2008 12:47 PM, William Allen Simpson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 >
>
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > Which ones? Do they speak Catalan? How did they end up speaking
> > Catalan without ever being part of Catalonia? Autonomous colonies?
> >
> To clarify my question, our current rule is:
>
>An _ancient_ or _medieval_ nation may list any city that it at some
>point controlled.
>
> For the purposes of this ticket, I opine that it is OK for historically
> Catalan-speaking cities to be included, as former Catalan colonies,
> whether founded under the Principality or a larger Empire ("Crown").
I understand. But... if we were to keep catalan.ruleset as medieval,
it would necessarily refer to the Principality of Catalonia, so the only
cities it could contain would be the ones from Catalonia proper,
Catalonia Nord and perhaps the Franja Ponent (see my previous post).
Valencia and Majorca were never part of the principality, nor were
colonies in the strict sense, so they can't be included if this is the
criteria to be used (nor Andorra, an independent entity).
--
Miguel Farah
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 6, 2008 11:53 AM, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yeah, but the city list in the ruleset DOES contain cities > > that have never been part of the Principality of Catalonia, or > > the Region of Catalonia or the current Autonomy. > > Which ones? Do they speak Catalan? How did they end up speaking > Catalan without ever being part of Catalonia? Autonomous colonies? All the cities in the current catalan.ruleset are catalan-speaking. There are cities from Catalonia "proper": Barcelona, Girona, Tarragona, Vic, Granollers, etc. There are cities from Valencia (Valencia, Alacant, Elx, etc.) and the Balearic Islands (Palma de Majorca, Eivissa, etc.). After those regions/kingdoms/etc. were reconquered from the muslim, they were repopulated with catalans, who brought their language with them. There are cities from the "Franja Ponent" (Fraga, etc.), a small strip from present-day Aragon that speaks catalan. Besides, the frontier between the principality and the Kingdom moved in historical times - Fraga used to be catalan, for example. There are cities from Catalunya Nord (Perpinyá, etc.) the area of Catalonia taken by the french in 1659 that is still rightfully claimed to be a part of Catalonia proper. And then's the Sardinian city of Alghero (L'Alguer), which was resettled in the 14th century by catalans. Finally, Andorra (a catalan speaking country), doesn't have any cities represented in the ruleset (Andorra la Vella, Sant Julià de Lòria, Encamp and Soldeu could be added). According to catalan nationalists, in order for a city or county or whatever to be a part of the Països Catalans, it must be a catalan-speaking area. -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > Yeah, but the city list in the ruleset DOES contain cities that have never been part of the Principality of Catalonia, or the Region of Catalonia or the current Autonomy. There's even a comment stating: ; This city list does not actually correspond to medieval Catalonia, ; but rather to the "Països Catalans" of modern ethnolinguistic ; nationalists. So, what do we do? Option 1: restrict the ruleset to Catalonia itself -> cities like Alacant, Elx, Palma de Mallorca, L'Alguer, et cetera, should be removed. Option 2: accept outright that the ruleset corresponds to the Països Catalans option. The only change needed would be replace "medieval" with "fictional". Let's not forget that there aren't any aragonese NON-catalan-speaking cities in the list. Option 3: create an aragonese ruleset for the CROWN of Aragon. Options 2 and 3 are compatible, and -if it were for me-, I'd implement both. On Jan 6, 2008 11:22 AM, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > Our replies crossed paths. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The current catalan.ruleset does NOT represent the medieval counties of > > Catalonia or the Crown of Aragon. Instead, it represents the "Països > > Catalans", a non-existing nation that some catalans want to create, > > seceding from Spain, and taking all the areas that are catalan-speaking: > > Catalonia, Valencia (either most or all of it), a strip of the current > > Aragon autonomy, the Balearic islands, the strip of Catalonia dominated > > by France (almost all of the Pyrénées-Orientales department), Andorra > > and the Sardinian city of Alghero. > > > According to the self determination of the populace, an _existing_ nation. > And the ruleset specifically states the city list is modern. > > > > So, he is right in stating that this is NOT a medieval nation (a ruleset > > for the Crown of Aragon would be). Instead, it should be marked as > > fictional or, at most, modern. > > > You mean the "Principality of Catalonia", the "Crown of Aragon" was later. > > Actually, having cities from different eras in more than one nation is > fairly typical in our rulesets. > > English are listed as Medieval, and British as Modern, but there's lots of > current cities in both. And a fair number are actually Scottish > > Greeks are listed as Ancient, and Hellenic as Modern, but there's lots of > current cities in both. And a fair number are actually Macedonian > > > > > ___ > Freeciv-dev mailing list > Freeciv-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev > -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 5, 2008 10:21 PM, Daniel Markstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > While we're on the topic, I'd like to discuss this: > http://forum.freeciv.org/viewtopic.php?t=4216 > > The poster is mainly trolling, but he brings up the legit question of > whether the Catalonia described in our ruleset existed in the middle > ages or not. From Freeciv's nations policy: "a nation listed as > ancient or medieval should have > had an independent dynasty or state in ancient or medieval times > respectively" ( > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/freeciv/trunk/doc/README.nations?rev=14172&view=auto > ) > > I'm not well versed in Iberian history, so please educate me on the issue. :) Indeed, Daniel, the poster is mostly trolling (if he dislikes so much the ruleset, he could simply erase that file from his installation and be done with it, instead of uninstalling the whole game). He's confusing several key points in the "history" he mentions to downplay Catalonia. Quick recap of Iberian history from 711 onwards: The Visigoth kingdom is overrun by the muslim invaders, who decided the Iberian Peninsula is a great place to live. Many locals actually join them, preferring them over the visigoth ruling class. Years later, the extreme north, not fully conquered, sees the formation of the first christian kingdom (in the west side): Asturias, which begins the process of reconquering the peninsula. Asturias begat Galicia and León, which begat Portugal and Castilla. As the centuries move forward, Castilla becomes the dominant kingdom and absorbs all except for Portugal. On the east side, the Carolingian Empire created the Spanish March to contain the muslims. Over time, this March developed into several independent kingdoms and counties. Aragon was one of those kingdoms, which grew by absorbing other smaller fiefs (Ribagorza, Sobrarbe, etc.) and to the south, retaking muslim lands. What today is called Catalonia began as a series of independent counties (Ausona, Gerona, Besalú, Conflent, Barcelona, etc.) which ended up united under the rule of the Count of Barcelona. Later, a dynastic union joined the Counties of Catalonia (by now Principality of Catalonia) and the Kingdom of Aragon, forming the CROWN of Aragon, which expanded southwards, conquering and creating the Kingdom of Valencia and the Kingdom of Majorca (taken from the muslims), and eastwards, taking Sicily, Naples and Sardinia (and others). The KINGDOM of Aragon was a single realm within the CROWN of Aragon. The capital city of the crown was Barcelona. The Crown was joined in 1479 in a PERSONAL union with the Crown of Castilla. Only later the separate Crowns were fused together into a single Crown (the crown of Spain). It's important to note that the Crown, as the maritime empire it was, was only loosely connected between its different realms - it worked more like a confederacy of kingdoms. Now, for some specific claims of the troll: - Catalonia wasn't a "province" of Aragon (the kingdom) - it was an independent realm within the Crown. - "Jaume" is the catalan form of "Jaime" (James), so for catalan speakers "Rei [King] Jaume I" is correct. - Ramon Berenguer IV was the Count of Barcelona who, by marriage to Petronila, son of the King of Aragon, became the first King of the Crown of Aragon [1] - but he was catalan first and foremost. - Both Peter/Pedro/Pere II [2] and James/Jaime/Jaume I were kings of the Crown of Aragon, so they qualify as Counts of Barcelona as well. [1] Actually, he was just "prince" - I'm simplifying a bit here. [2] "Pere II" refers to Peter III of Aragon (known as Peter II of Barcelona), who conquered Sicily. All that said, there is one point that the guy does have, even if he's a bit confused. The current catalan.ruleset does NOT represent the medieval counties of Catalonia or the Crown of Aragon. Instead, it represents the "Països Catalans", a non-existing nation that some catalans want to create, seceding from Spain, and taking all the areas that are catalan-speaking: Catalonia, Valencia (either most or all of it), a strip of the current Aragon autonomy, the Balearic islands, the strip of Catalonia dominated by France (almost all of the Pyrénées-Orientales department), Andorra and the Sardinian city of Alghero. So, he is right in stating that this is NOT a medieval nation (a ruleset for the Crown of Aragon would be). Instead, it should be marked as fictional or, at most, modern. Oh, and let's remove the portuguese nation from civilwar_nations while we're at it. Some references: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalan_language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_of_Aragon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pa%C3%AFsos_Catalans -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > On Jan 5, 2008 4:38 PM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You call that being negative? No way! On the contrary, it's great to get > good feedback, particularly from the original author of the ruleset. Actually, I wasn't the original author - I did a lot of work on it, though. > Guardamar is Guardamar del Segura, one of the four traditional extreme > points where the Catalan language is spoken (along with Salses, Fraga and > Maó, with permission from l'Alguer). I didn't even know there was a > Guardamar in la Safor, but I will add it. Cool. You forgot to add " (ocean)" to both, though. >[...] > I will add both "hills" and "ocean" for Peníscola. Yes, only hills is > justified by the name, but I can't resist having "ocean" for a place like > that. You know what? Me neither. Peníscola is a special place. :-) And, while we're at it, let's add some more cities as well: Roses Calonge Treumal Cambrils Tossa de Mar (ocean) Solsona Agramunt What do you think? -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#40001) Update to catalan.ruleset for 2.1
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > Thanks, Joan, for improving on the ruleset I worked on quite some time ago. Adding Pau Claris, Salses and Fraga were nice touches, I think. Now, I hate to be negative, BUT... IIRC, the geographic features (hills, ocean, etc.) were supposed to be added when the city name explicitly states it, so a city name like Montserrat (meaning "Serrated Mount") can get the " (hills)" designation, but Barcelona can't have " (ocean)" even if the real-life city is coastal. At least, that's the criteria I used back then. So, I think the added geographical features added to Amposta, Barcelona, Begur, Blanes, Cadaqués, Lleida, Maó (newly added), Palma de Mallorca, Tarragona and València have to be removed. By the way, the first time around, we forgot to add " (hills)" to Peníscola (it's name derives from "peña", meaning "bouldery hill"). I'd complete the name of newly added Sant Fruitós: Sant Fruitós de Bages. I'm not sure whether the newly added city name of Guardamar refers to Guardamar de la Safor or to Guardamar del Segura. Let's add both! :-) In both cases, the " (ocean)" designation is warranted, and the latter might deserve the " (river)" designation as well. On Jan 4, 2008 11:29 AM, Joan Creus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40001 > > > This transaction appears to have no content > > The catalan ruleset has a few typos in city names. In the attached patch, I > have fixed them, added a few more cities, and added a couple new (long dead) > rulers for good measure. No translatable string has been changed, for > inclusion in 2.1. > > Thanks, > > Joan -- Miguel Farah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39961) Open diplomacy tabs from previous turns have wrong data during current turns
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39961 > Sorry to hear that, i kinda liked having them around to remind me during all the micro-managing of world domination, if they just disapear every turn i'd forget what the AI was planning to do to me... That's why i kinda wanted a refresh of Tabs more than the Tabs to go away, but i trust you guys know best what to do, anyhow, just my 2bits. Great Great Game! =) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39965) Uncompressed & Compressed savegames use differing whitespace
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39965 > I noticed that savegames using no compression (level 0) and savegames using compression (at least the default level 6) use completely different line end whitespace, and so the the two files yield more "differences" than content. I would expect that the game use one form of savegame whitespace consistently, or that the gzip library used use the same line end white space as the FreeCiv game does. Or perhaps WinRar is doing this to me... i dunno ;) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39959) SaveGame compression level changes when Leaving & (re)Loading savegames!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39959 > Thanks William, i did notice this issue many years ago too, so i can see what you're saying is true. I now just either accept the default compression level, or change it and go back with WinRar or 7Zip and undo compression as needed. I was just surprised that even with my own rulesets used from the start that Leave & Load changed server options my rulesets specifically set. I could fathom Quit doing that. Perhaps a "refresh ruleset button" post Savegame Loading? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39961) Open trading tabs from previous turns have wrong data during current trading...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39961 > WinXp sp2 + FC 211GTK2 ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39955) Bug: Can't see FreeCiv's default Theme scroll bar tabs!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39955 > Hi Great Gods of FreeCiv Team, I would humble like to request a change to the FreeCiv default Theme so i may for ever more see, and therefor use, FreeCiv's default Theme scroll bar tabs! Since they're almost everywhere it is troublesome not to see them ever! Jpeg attached. PS If this can't be a fix for all to enjoy, please send me the fix or way to fix this issue. <>___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39954) Savegames are corrupted Bug...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39954 > Update: Savegames are becomming corrupted if i leave and go back to an earlier save game and then go forward, it is like it is combining the two past and present savegames into one?? For example: If i go a few years, autosave..., autosave..., autosave... then i manual save, then i go back to a previous autosave and go forward, then i go back again and go forward... Some where in there i get corruption and i have to go even further back to recover a working saved game. How do i turn OFF the automatic saving of games as i exit? If i load a save game and make a few moves or even just exit it overwrites a saved game on exit, no warning, no confirmation, no choice, it just does this!! This is very wrong behavior... I will try and see if i can send files that show exactly this corruption in progress, but don't wait for me to fix this bug. Really awesome game folks!!! Thanks!! =) - During game play i left and loaded an auto save game, but i can no longer Meet AI Players to offer or negotiate!? I wonder what or why the savegame corruption? I'm attaching the save game, my system is WinXP + Freeciv-2.1.1-gtk2. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#16811) Issue tracking system for Freeciv
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > Daniel Markstedt wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > > > >>> sourceforge.net: The question was if bugzilla could run on SF.net webspace? >>> >> Would be nice. >> As has already been mentioned - SF has its own issue tracking system. > "Disk Quota: Each project is provided 100MB of disk space for their > usage." I'm quite sure the RT database ecxeeds that already. ( > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4297&group_id=1#acceptable_use > ) > > Why is that? What is causing the the high disk space usage? Attachments? Issues (unlikely)? Code? Something else? >>> icculus.org: IIRC, this was Per's contact. Status? >>> seul.org: IIRC, this was Egor's contact. Status? >>> >> Is that any better than freeciv.org? >> >> > > Dunno. Haven't yet seen their terms of use. > > >> What about GNA? >> >> > > If you mean the tracker, there was the problem that all projects use > common bug numbering. If we were to import a database of tens of > thousands of reports, it'd upset that system. > > Bugzilla provides the ability to use an alias for a bug, so it wouldn't be a problem to create "FCRT" as an alias for those that want to use the "old" issue numbers. That makes it easy to move to from system and not worry about renumbering. JIRA uses numbering per-project so the same is true there. >> >> >> To me the biggest issue is carrying over the bug database. Not that >> this is a show-stopper since it's clear that RT is not going to last >> forever and the longer we wait the worst the problem there will get - >> but, as RT is a simple database and bugzilla (or whatever) is a simple >> database it really shouldn't be too hard to transfer the whole thing over. >> Jason, I agree. The good thing about Bugzilla is that it does have the ability to import XML. The question is, how to deal with the bug's history. So - before migrating to any system, I think it's fair to ask - what are the requirements for data coming from the old system? How much of it must be carried over versus what parts can be left behind? I would have to assume that the RT system would be available for at least a short period after a migration was completed at least so that old data could still be looked up. Typically, the way I've done migrations like these is to write an import script that imports data from an existing system into the new system, first from a backed-up copy for development and testing purposes, then on migration day, from the live system. Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#16811) Issue tracking system for Freeciv
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > Daniel, > If Bugzilla is indeed as easy to maintain as you say, I could volunteer > to take responsibility for it. > > The question of hosting remains. AFAIK, four alternatives have been > proposed over the years: > > freeciv.org > sourceforge.net > icculus.org > seul.org > > Let's go through them: > > freeciv.org: Our own aging servers in Paul's basement. Are they up to > the task? > sourceforge.net: The question was if bugzilla could run on SF.net webspace? > icculus.org: IIRC, this was Per's contact. Status? > seul.org: IIRC, this was Egor's contact. Status? > > ~Daniel > Bugzilla is pretty easy to administer these days. You can try it out on your own system if you'd like. The installation guide is very good and covers Linux well as well as Windows. It requires: A web server (preferrably Apache), a database server (preferrably MySQL), and Perl (5.8.6 or greater IIRC). One of the Bugzilla systems I manage at work takes less than 200MB of disk with about 50,000 bugs and all its associated data (attachments, code and templates included). Bugzilla has a tremendous reporting system and doing the queries you discussed in your email 2-3 hours after this one are all well covered. Users can sign themselves up for Bugzilla if it is configured to allow it and it now includes fairly good support for receiving emailed bug reports. I strongly encourage giving it a try on your own system first. Please let me know if you need help. Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#30483) 2.1.0b2/Windows Mouse goto with Air units causes client crash
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=30483 > Jason Short wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=30483 > > > Is this still a problem? Or have these goto bugs been fixed? > > -jason > It appears that this is still an issue, though I have yet to be able to test it on 2.1.1 Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#21270) 2.1b2 civclient WinXP city display should show size, not just population
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=21270 > (I'm actually using the Gtk2 client, so technically my comment is out of place, but I don't see a reason to fork the discussion.) s1kevin writes: > Rather than showing users just the population, please show us both the > city size and population. Me too. My need for this is when gauging how long until I have to worry about a growth-enabling improvement for a city. Currently, the most obvious UI element representing city size is the row of icons representing citizens. I can ust about cope with judging how close I am to 8 (aqueduct) by eye, but guessing how close I am to needing a sewer system (size 12) without resorting to counting is beyond me. The alternative is to go back and look at the map or city list or something. This seems daft; it'd be really helpful to have the numeric city size somewhere in the city dialog. dmarks writes: > But the size can be inferred from the population, can't it? Technically, yes, but the translation is non-obvious -- it's probably harder than the counting above. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39914) Fedora server problem
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39914 > i agree. that might be the case ( although you know better me being a newbie). as is the case, this has now stopped. this is what i did. removed the freeciv package from the system and reinstalled the package (had earlier upgraded it) and now its working fine. was wondering though if it only happens on an upgrade. Thanks for your reply and advice. much appreciated. cheers, Kunal On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 05:28 -0800, William Allen Simpson wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39914 > > > There was a known exception (not a crash) in Fedora only, hopefully fixed in > 2.1.1. Please verify that 2.1.1 has fixed the problem. > > ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39914) Freeciv Crash
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39914 > hi, using fedora core 8. installed from rpm package. freeciv version 2.1 thanks Kunal On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:41 -0800, Jason Short wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39914 > > > > [guest - Mon Nov 26 16:13:28 2007]: > > > > hi, > > freeciv client crashes too often after about 5-6 turns. sometimes says > > connection to server lost on a localhost game. Attached a bug report. > > thanks > > What platform are you using? > > What version of Freeciv? > > -jason > ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39883) Gtk2 client tends to flake out after a while
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39883 > Jason Short: > [Jacob Nevins:] > > There is a fair amount of error reportage on the client's stderr. This > > seems to be disappointingly normal for this Linux system -- there are > > some errors that show up for every X program -- but perhaps some of > > them may be diagnostic; I haven't attempted to see if any of them are > > correlated with the reported symptoms. I could dig deeper. > > You could send the stderr reports and we could glance through them. > Most likely nothing useful will be there though. OK, I've done this and I think there is a clue here. Here's what I see on the console (stdout/stderr): Startup. I think the following is due to system misconfiguration. At least the BadDevice stuff is, it happens for every X client. open /dev/sequencer: No such file or directory X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 169 Major opcode: 147 Minor opcode: 3 Resource id: 0x0 Failed to open device X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 169 Major opcode: 147 Minor opcode: 3 Resource id: 0x0 Failed to open device (civclient:13234): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "pixmap", (this message x25) Now it's displaying the initial do-you-want-to-start-a-game-or-what screen. I load a savegame, select nation, and start the game. 2: Old attributes detected and removed. This probably isn't relevant to this bug, but this message appears to be generated by the game restore code. I note in passing that the savegame I'm loading was created by the same version of Freeciv, 2.1.0, that I'm using to load it, so if this is a backwards compatibility measure it looks like something's gone wrong. QPixmap::operator=: Cannot assign to pixmap during painting This error message comes up frequently during gameplay. It can even occur on repaints (Alt-Tab away and back). Since it appears to be something to do with Qt, and Freeciv doesn't touch Qt directly, I speculate that this would only be seen when running under KDE (which is what I'm doing, in case it wasn't obvious from the initial report). We get thousands of these QPixmap messages during about 2.5 hours of gameplay. Just before the point where I notice my symptoms occurring, these other messages appear at various intervals: (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x376242b unexpectedly destroyed (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x376242e unexpectedly destroyed (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3764519 unexpectedly destroyed (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3764523 unexpectedly destroyed At this point I notice that it's gone wonky and start preparing to save and quit. I get more errors mixed in with QPixmap nonsense, then a crash :( (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x3764576 unexpectedly destroyed (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x376450d unexpectedly destroyed (civclient:13234): Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x37645b8 unexpectedly destroyed Segmentation fault It doesn't usually crash before I manage to save. Unfortunately, I don't have a coredump. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39885) Picks same nation twice from civil war list from same host nation
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39885 > > On 11/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I managed to take the Poles' capital and provoke civil war twice in > > succession in a single game. Both times, Freeciv decided to name the > > seceding faction as the Silesians, so the game ended up with two > > identically-named but separate nations. > > Could it have been before this patch was applied? > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=17436 I don't think so -- that patch was applied in January 2007, I didn't start the game until May, and I believe I was always using the latest available beta of 2.1.0. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39885) Picks same nation twice from civil war list from same host nation
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39885 > I managed to take the Poles' capital and provoke civil war twice in succession in a single game. Both times, Freeciv decided to name the seceding faction as the Silesians, so the game ended up with two identically-named but separate nations. It would be good if this could be avoided. In polish.ruleset, we have civilwar_nations = "lithuanian", "silesian", "ukrainian" so it's not as if the server was pushed for choice (neither the Lithuanians nor the Ukrainians had ever been in the game). This would have been with one of the 2.1.0 betas (client and server); I don't know precisely which one offhand, but I have the savegames, and can probably guess what version I was using at the time. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39886) Paradrop always displays turns to target as "Unreachable"
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39886 >
In the 2.1.0 Gtk2 client, when paradropping a Paratrooper unit, the unit
info on the left always says "Unreachable", regardless of whether the
cursor is over a point where the paradrop would succeed.
The attached screenshot illustrates this. It's from one of the betas
from before PR#39693 was fixed, so instead of "Unreachable" it says
"Turns to target: 10 to -1", but the underlying bug is the same
and remains in the 2.1.0 release.
This is a cosmetic problem and doesn't impact the mechanics of the
paradrop. I'm not sure what it should display instead; I suspect the
display should be special-cased for the "paradrop" action. It would be
nice if there was an indication somewhere of whether the cursor was
within the 10-tile limit so that I didn't have to count tiles.
Running on Kubuntu Linux 6.06 ("Dapper").
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39884) Typo "succesfully" in English airlift message
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39884 > Trivial, but it's been bugging me for years: when a unit is airlifted, Freeciv says "Engineers transported succesfully." "Successfully" is spelled thus (two 's's). This is in the 2.1.0 release (and every version since I can remember). Gtk2 client, if it matters. I haven't attempted to provide a patch, as this text is used as the msgid for translations and I don't know quite how to deal with that. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#19366) Window handling error?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19366 > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19366 > Sorry for not replying to this before the 2.1.0 release. I couldn't log in to RT at all when I read your email, and couldn't remember what the problem report was. > Did you ever get this crash with a more recent version of Freeciv? > Any savegame? I haven't used a Windows client again recently, but I have been using the Gtk2 client of the 2.1.0 betas and release, and I've founded lots of cities without trouble. I probably have got the savegame I alluded to in my original report lying around somewhere, but it's not conveniently to hand. I can try to dig it out if you're still interested. Might be best to close this one. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#16811) Re: (PR#39854) Change bug tracking system
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 09:07 -0800, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > > > On Nov 11, 2007 5:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From the hosting standpoint, if freeciv.org becomes a 401c3, then it > > could collect donations so that it could pay for its own hosting if it > > had to. > > The problem has always been to find someone who could host it with an > absolutely minimum of work needed to maintain it from our end. > > Registering and maintaining a charity is almost a full time job. > > > Has anyone looked into sourceforge? > > Last I checked, it could not run bugzilla. > > - Per > Hosting Bugzilla is actually very lightweight on time intensiveness from an administrative perspective. It's now possible to give the ability to manage individual product configurations to individuals that are not administrators without giving away the keys to the rest of the installation. In the past three years, I can count on one hand the number of times I had to fix things with Bugzilla, Apache, and MySQL (Linux based). In any case, I don't really care if it's Bugzilla, Sourceforge, Trac, Jira, or something else. My point is that right now, the current issue tracking system could do a lot more to help foster contributions. Rather than spending a lot of resources fixing RT, why not use something that does a much better job meeting the needs out of the box? Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#16811) Re: (PR#39854) Change bug tracking system
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 01:43 -0800, Erik Johansson wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811 > > > On Nov 11, 2007 8:30 AM, Tautvydas Andrikys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39854 > > > > > This bug tracking system is very simple and it is hard to track bugs, no > > milestones, no SVN view, etc.(or maybe I dont see that as reporter). > > > > I think the most important thing is hosting for the bug system, people > seems to think that the RT machine will go down anytime now (please > correct me). I will not supply hosting for the system, because I can't > promise continuity on my servers. > > /Erik > Also, with the recent release of Bugzilla 3, custom fields that may be needed for this project are now largely, a configuration option. This also includes custom workflow. On the import side, Bugzilla does support importing from XML. An email interface now comes with Bugzilla as well, though I'm not certain if it'll accept new bugs at this point (haven't used it). >From the administrative standpoint, I'll gladly teach someone who wants to know how to maintain the system. >From the hosting standpoint, if freeciv.org becomes a 401c3, then it could collect donations so that it could pay for its own hosting if it had to. Has anyone looked into sourceforge? BTW - this issue has been open for about two years and I'm wondering (honestly) if a move like this will ever happen until someone decides to kick in something to make it happen. What that something is, I don't know and as time goes on, I begin to care less and less. It's not because I don't want to see FreeCiv using an issue tracker that encourages community participation, rather it's loosing interest in spending energy trying to lead a team into something that it seems they don't want (with some exceptions like possibly DanielM). As I see it, it's not about Bugzilla vs. RT, it's about the usability of the issue tracking system in place for open source development. Searching in RT sucks in comparison to many other issue trackers (Bugzilla, Jira, ...). The way permissions are set up currently, it's difficult to participate in a way that allows a contributor to find out if an issue has already been reported, and if it has, what the current state of the issue is. Just looking at a list of bugs requires a login at this point. I could go on, but as I see it, these are barriers to more development and review resources contributing to the project. I strongly encourage current FreeCiv developers to go take a look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ to see a running example of Bugzilla and how it's used for open-source development today. Be aware that there are companies using Bugzilla out there with over one million bugs (issues) filed in their installations (Yahoo! is tracking well over 1.5M). Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39825) Freeciv 2.1.0 SDL client bug
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39825 > Erik Johansson wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39825 > > > On Nov 2, 2007 12:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39825 > >> >> game crashes when disbanding a unit and outputs Segmentation fault core >> dump >> > > Hi Weston > > can you tell us what, OS, version of freeciv, you are using. Please > tell us when this happens, and if you can reproduce it send us the > savegame.. > > I tried on 2.1 SDL and it seems to handle disbands fine. > > Have fun /Erik > > > im sorry i was kinda doing alot of things at once Ubuntu 7.10 and 2.1.0 i built it from source and if i disband some of the in-city units freeciv crashes -- Weston Hanners Phone: 812-545-9390 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS/L/MU d(--) s+:+ a-- C+++(++) UL+++ !P L+++ !E W++>$ N+ o? K--? w !O !M !V PS+() PE-- Y? !PGP t++ !5 !X R tv b+() DI+ D+ G e h--- r+++ y+* --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- civgame-0800.sav.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data begin:vcard fn:Lionel Hanners n:Hanners;Lionel email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;home:812-545-9390 tel;cell:812-545-9390 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39825) Freeciv 2.1.0 SDL client bug
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39825 > game crashes when disbanding a unit and outputs Segmentation fault core dumped -- Weston Hanners -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS/L/MU d(--) s+:+ a-- C+++(++) UL+++ !P L+++ !E W++>$ N+ o? K--? w !O !M !V PS+() PE-- Y? !PGP t++ !5 !X R tv b+() DI+ D+ G e h--- r+++ y+* --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- begin:vcard fn:Lionel Hanners n:Hanners;Lionel email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;home:812-545-9390 tel;cell:812-545-9390 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#21637) 2.1.0b2 Numeric and cursor keys don't work
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=21637 > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 04:44 -0800, Daniel Markstedt wrote: > I thought all recent laptop keyboards have a 'soft' numerical > keyboard: 789, uio, jkl, that you can access with the "fn" (or > similarly named) key? > > Anyway, keyboard commands certainly ought to be mappable to > accommodate for everyone's preferences. Daniel, for the most part, they do, but it's still a usability issue when I can simply use a number for unit movement. I want to stay as far away from the mouse as possible, and using multi-key combinations is about as bad for basic usage functions. I agree - mappable keys make tremendous amounts of sense and would solve my issue. Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39822) Feature Request - Adding Global Lists while in the City Sheet(F1)...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39822 > It would be a real time saver to have the ability to Add Global Work lists in the Cities Sheet(F1) - IMHO. Currently, we must go to each city and add global lists - unless i'm wrong about this(?). ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39810) Bug: Keyboard Commands Stopped Functioning!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39810 > Well, i uninstalled FC210b6, but have the save games and .fc files still, i was going to try these save games and .rc files in the new FC210 i have install at some point. Since i'm kinda getting from you that these issues are not reproducable, i'n looking into my USB keyboard, its drivers, the USB hub chips, and the weather conditions possibilities. Since i was able to see these issues quite often and obviously from the two bug reports i sent directly to you (that was during my confusion trying to send bug reports to Bugs@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] because it says to that on the header of FreeCiv's Bug Tracker instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]) What is the small window that keeps opening up and stealing my commands? Some sort of chat/server command/debug window? If i knew i could tell if this is part of the issue. What are the real commands? are some unlisted? I find that Shift-Home and just Home function the same, and that the map scroll commands either do or don't need the Shift also with the arrow keys?? There seems to be unlisted features and commands which has me confused somewhat, especially the tiny text window. So, if you cannot reproduce the issues Dan, especially from the two Assertion Failed bugs i sent you this last weekend, then i will keep looking for the reasons both inside the game and in the system i have, for example i'll hook in two USB keyboards and see what happens between the two. But since i switched off the beta6 to the new 210 release i will really be looking for bugs in the new release. Really Great game! =) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Daniel Markstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39810) Bug: Keyboard Commands Stopped Functioning! Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:19:52 -0800 http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39810 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 29 15:39:38 2007]: > > For some reason my FreeCiv 210b6 Client stopped accepting keyboard >commands, or mostly, erratically. I can still use all the mouse >commands, i think, i use the Client CUI pull-down menu Commands to >actually move and play, uhg. > > I have some keyboard control if i Quit and restart the save games, but >it degenerates rather quickly, also when only able to use the mouse >i cannot effectively switch from unit to unit, somehow if i try the >units get 'joined' together and any commands i issue they both >follow, like a Goto command. > > I checked out my keyboard was not screwed-up by simultaneously using >notepad in another background window and my keystrokes were as >issued, no stuck meta keys, etc. > > What can i submit to help resolve this issue? I think i only changed >a few city trade variables in the server options from the last time >things worked well. > > Thanks for a really Cool Game!! =) > > > What's the status on this? You mentioned in PR#39814 that it could have been a problem with your keyboard. ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39812) Bug: Cannot Rename Global worklists in FC210
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39812 > Hi Dan, Yes, windows FC210 GTK2 (non beta, just downloaded and fresh install) I was (and may still be) having a whole slew of USB keyboard anomalies, this may just be one glitch, i'm looking real close at my keyboard drivers or that my keyboard input somehow triggers something in FreeCiv to cause the the bugs i've submitted. We have some possible static and RF noise due to weather changes and this may have caused the issues as well. But it is really helpful if you tell me that you do or do not get the same errors, what were the results of the two bug reports i sent directly to you this last weekend? I've not seen the ticket#s yet. What is the small input block window that keeps showing up during game play? My keystrokes get put into the box rather than being executed a commands, is i some sort of small chat or debug/server command window?? The 210 build is REALLY REALLY Great! Thanks so much! =) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Daniel Markstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39812) Bug: Cannot Rename Global worklists in FC210 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:17:48 -0800 Works for me in 2.1.0, win32-gtk2 build. Click once to select, twice to make name editable, change name and hit enter. Are you using the windows build? If not, could you post your GTK+ version? ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39816) Design Request: That the GTK2 Client GUI have a Trade Sheet... F4?
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39816 > I would like to see a Trade overview sheet(could we use F4?) in the Client GUI so i may enjoy the aspects of trading far more, currently i have to view the City overview sheet to see if a trade route even exists!! And that gives no details at all, i would like to see all the wonderful details of trading between cities and players brought out, this aspect of the game seems to lay dormant for some reason(s). Thanks for a GREAT game! =) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39729) City Governor is disabled for all cities after I (re)load saved game
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39729 > > Původní zpráva > Od: Daniel Markstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Předmět: (PR#39729) City Governor is disabled for all cities after I (re)load > saved game > Datum: 28.10.2007 11:08:25 > > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39729 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Sep 27 07:47:35 2007]: > > > > It is with current svn version r.13653. game save attached. City > > Governor is disabled for all cities after I (re)load saved game even > > if I enable it before save and I play some turns. > > > > Marek > > > > > > This sounds like that pesky AI-takes-one-more-turn bug. Try reloading the > next- > latest savegame instead. > > Also, please tell us the version of Freeciv and your system details. This is changing quickly - with latest version I had (16 Oct) it worked fine. I saw again randomly that AI takes control over my human player. But again it was random and now it is ok. I think this issue can closed. Thanks Marek > > ~Daniel > > > Marek Slama [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#21637) 2.1.0b2 Numeric and cursor keys don't work
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=21637 > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 04:47 -0700, Daniel Markstedt wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=21637 > > It works here, if using the numerical keyboard. > > This is probably a documentation issue. It should be clear in the help > that these are the numbers on the numerical keyboard. Hi Daniel, >From my perspective, it's a usability issue largely because it doesn't work for laptop users like myself. Since we don't have a separate numeric keypad, being able to use the top row of numbers is important. It seems to me that Ctrl-Fx could be used to create a group and Shift-Fx could be used to select a group. My other reason for wanting to use the numbers has a lot to do with the direction (arrow, pageup/dn, home/end) keys not working unless I actually click on the map screen. That is annoying at least and at times, causes problems because the behavior is inconsistent. Depending on the situation, I can keep hitting the same direction key and sometimes, the unit moves, sometimes it doesn't. Thanks Daniel. Kevin ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39812) Bug: Cannot Rename Global worklists in FC210
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39812 > Hi! Just downloaded & installed FreeCiv 210 (not Beta) on WinXP SP2 etc. I cannot seem to rename the Global Worklist in the GTK2 Client GUI, now i have multiple lists named "new". used to be able to do this in FC210b6. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39810) Bug: Keyboard Commands Stopped Functioning!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39810 > For some reason my FreeCiv 210b6 Client stopped accepting keyboard commands, or mostly, erratically. I can still use all the mouse commands, i think, i use the Client CUI pull-down menu Commands to actually move and play, uhg. I have some keyboard control if i Quit and restart the save games, but it degenerates rather quickly, also when only able to use the mouse i cannot effectively switch from unit to unit, somehow if i try the units get 'joined' together and any commands i issue they both follow, like a Goto command. I checked out my keyboard was not screwed-up by simultaneously using notepad in another background window and my keystrokes were as issued, no stuck meta keys, etc. What can i submit to help resolve this issue? I think i only changed a few city trade variables in the server options from the last time things worked well. Thanks for a really Cool Game!! =) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39751) BUG REPORT - CAN'T SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39751 > Update: Here's what i found, when the client is started it tries to fill the desktop except for a small horizontal strip at the bottom, which i assumed was so we M$ Windows users would be able to see their TaskBar, i do not have my TaskBar at the bottom of the desktop, but rather at the top, so i was annoyed by this behavior. I could not get the client to start up without this anomaly, so i set my Taskbar to auto-hide and was frequently annoyed that iff i moused up too far it would unhide and cover the Client GUI top menu - repeatedly! So my mouse skills were also tested as i played - who says FreeCiv is not a 1st person shooter game! ;) later, i found that if i clicked on the bottom pixel of the client window i would get a normal window which could be moved away from my TaskBar - yh! But if i did anything in local options the window would again resize and be covered bu the TaskBar - rgh! I also noticed that that i had this set to fullscreen, i will try and resolve the 'issue' by setting the game to not fullscreen and hope i find my gaming Nirvana. On the side of Development, the GUI people may want to really look into this, either take the whole Desktop or know where the TaskBar IS and allow for it so there is NO overlap of the default Client GUI window and TaskBar, or just set the default to non-fullscreen (aka Windowed). Thanks for a really great GAME!! =) ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39677) freeciv crashes while updating unit
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > I just tried it... It worked well. Thanks for fixing it. On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:05 -0700, Christian Prochaska wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 19. Okt 2007, 19:59:56]: > > > > Thanks a lot. Will these make it into SVN soon? If so, I can wait for > > that. > > > > Yes, they are both in SVN now. > David Walling I just tried it... It worked well. Thanks for fixing it. On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 13:05 -0700, Christian Prochaska wrote: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 19. Okt 2007, 19:59:56]: > > Thanks a lot. Will these make it into SVN soon? If so, I can wait for > that. > Yes, they are both in SVN now. David Walling ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39677) freeciv crashes while updating unit
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > Thanks a lot. Will these make it into SVN soon? If so, I can wait for that. On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 12:52 -0700, Christian Prochaska wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > > > > [cproc - Fr 19. Okt 2007, 12:20:26]: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do 06. Sep 2007, 21:08:48]: > > > > > > I am running Freeciv version 2.1.0-beta6 (beta version) gui-sdl > > > > > > I got the following error when trying to upgrade a unit: > > > > > > civclient > > > 2: Using Video Output: x11 > > > 2: 480, 27, 0 > > > 2: area.h = 410 > > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > > 2: area.h = 614 > > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > > 2: area.h = 614 > > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > > 2: area.h = 614 > > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > > 2: area.h = 614 > > > civclient: repodlgs.c:171: popup_upgrade_unit_callback: Assertion > > > `(&ut1) != ((void *)0) && (utype_by_number((&ut1)->index) == (&ut1))' > > > failed. > > > Aborted > > > > > > The game died :( > > > > > > > The attached patch fixes the failed assertion in S2_1 (already fixed in > > S2_2/trunk) and removes the forgotten debug output. The segmentation > > fault still remains at the moment. > > > > > > And here's the crash fix. > David Walling Thanks a lot. Will these make it into SVN soon? If so, I can wait for that. On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 12:52 -0700, Christian Prochaska wrote: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > > [cproc - Fr 19. Okt 2007, 12:20:26]: > > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do 06. Sep 2007, 21:08:48]: > > > > I am running Freeciv version 2.1.0-beta6 (beta version) gui-sdl > > > > I got the following error when trying to upgrade a unit: > > > > civclient > > 2: Using Video Output: x11 > > 2: 480, 27, 0 > > 2: area.h = 410 > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > 2: area.h = 614 > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > 2: area.h = 614 > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > 2: area.h = 614 > > 2: 768, 27, 0 > > 2: area.h = 614 > > civclient: repodlgs.c:171: popup_upgrade_unit_callback: Assertion > > `(&ut1) != ((void *)0) && (utype_by_number((&ut1)->index) == (&ut1))' > > failed. > > Aborted > > > > The game died :( > > > > The attached patch fixes the failed assertion in S2_1 (already fixed in > S2_2/trunk) and removes the forgotten debug output. The segmentation > fault still remains at the moment. > > And here's the crash fix. David Walling ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39752) BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39752 > Hey Mark! =) Since i cannot seem to Guest login to the FreeCiv Bug tracker... I'll just thank you this way! THANK YOU!! =) oh, sorry 4 CAPS... =) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Daniel Markstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39752) BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX... Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:43:45 -0700 http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39752 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Oct 05 22:50:07 2007]: > > Okay, i found the way FreeCiv does this, however, there should be an >easier way to switch tilesets within the game or as an option at >the start of game, the CMD line -t flag is a bit old fashioned to >say the least! Considering FreeCiv has come this far it should get >some attention to this important detail. IMHO. > > Thanks for a great looking game! > Please add this BUG REPORT to all the other people who find the >workarounds are in the FAQs. > > The GTK2 client supports the changing of tilesets in-game. Go to the "Game" menu and select "Local Option" and look in the "Tileset" dropdown. BTW, please don't write whole sentences in capitals. It's hard to read. ~Daniel ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39754) WHY HAS FREECIV DECIDED TO HIDE SERVER OPTIONS
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39754 > Hi Mark! Thank you for this info, that's resolved then!! My last concern for now is IF i save a game then load that saved game, it totally forgets who i was, er , meaning i got like 30 nations to choose from of which 29 were AI and 1 was me... i dunno, is that a feature? IS there a way to be the nation i was besides REMEMBERING that info for each saved game somehow...? TIA!! --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Daniel Markstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39754) WHY HAS FREECIV DECIDED TO HIDE SERVER OPTIONS Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:16:19 -0700 http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39754 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Oct 05 22:59:28 2007]: > > REGARDING THE FOUR BUG REPORTS - I ADDED THE NEEDED INFO ALREADY IN >EMAIL REPLY. > > THE ONLY Q I HAVE REMAINING IS: WHY HAS FREECIV DECIDED TO HIDE SERVER >OPTIONS LIKE THE SAVE-GAME FILE NAME??? I LIKE TO SET THIS EVERY >TIME, HOW DO I CHANGE THESE HIDDEN SERVER OPTIONS IN SINGLE PLAYER >GAMES?? > > They aren't hidden as such, it's just that noone has implemented a gui option for them in the (GTK2) client, yet. You can use the chatline/commandline in pregame to set any server option though. To change the savegame prefix for example, do: /set savename yourgamename Reference of all server options at http://freeciv.wikia.com/wiki/Server_options ~Daniel PS. Please don't write your bug reports in capitals. DS. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39751) BUG REPORT - CAN'T SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39751 > STILL CANNOT SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP WHEN WE HAVE OUR TASKBAR AT TOP OF DESKTOP, FREECIV DOES NOT ALLOW THIS TO WORK, FREECIV ONLY ALLOWS TASKBAR TO BE AT BOTTOM OF DESKTOP, PLEASE FIX THIS UNREASONABLE GUI ANOMALY ASAP!!! CAN'T LOGIN TO BUG TRACKER SO HERE YOU GO! THANK YOU FOR GREAT FUN GAME! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39750) AutoReply: CAN'T LOGIN TO BUGTRACKER TO MAKE BUG REPORTS!!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39750 > USING FIREFOX 2007 +ABP +NOSCRIPT --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "The default queue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39750) AutoReply: CAN'T LOGIN TO BUGTRACKER TO MAKE BUG REPORTS!! Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:26:38 -0700 Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "CAN'T LOGIN TO BUGTRACKER TO MAKE BUG REPORTS!!", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#39750). Please include the string: (PR#39750) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, - Not logged in. Error Your username or password is incorrect Login RT 3.0.6 Username: Guest Password: viceerf Guest access with user "guest" and password as seen on the left. If you plan to use the web interface, please consider getting an account. Ask on the mailing list, on the forums, or on the irc channel. Not logged in. Error Your username or password is incorrect Login RT 3.0.6 Username: guest Password: viceerf Guest access with user "guest" and password as seen on the left. If you plan to use the web interface, please consider getting an account. Ask on the mailing list, on the forums, or on the irc channel. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39750) CAN'T LOGIN TO BUGTRACKER TO MAKE BUG REPORTS!!
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39750 > Not logged in. Error Your username or password is incorrect Login RT 3.0.6 Username: Guest Password: viceerf Guest access with user "guest" and password as seen on the left. If you plan to use the web interface, please consider getting an account. Ask on the mailing list, on the forums, or on the irc channel. Not logged in. Error Your username or password is incorrect Login RT 3.0.6 Username: guest Password: viceerf Guest access with user "guest" and password as seen on the left. If you plan to use the web interface, please consider getting an account. Ask on the mailing list, on the forums, or on the irc channel. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39753) BUG REPORT - GAME DOESN'T SAVE SERVER OPTIONS...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39753 > REGARDING THIS BUG REPORT - MY SETUP IS WIN XP SP2 LATEST PATCHES, AMD DUALCORE, FIREFOX 2007, FREECIV 210BETA6. NOTE: WHY HAVE YOU'ALL DECIDED TO HIDE STUFF LIKE THE SAVE-GAME FILE NAME??? I LIKE TO SET THIS EVERY TIME, HOW DO I CHANGE THESE HIDDEN SERVER OPTIONS IN SINGLE PLAYER GAMES?? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "The default queue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39753) AutoReply: BUG REPOET - GAME DOESN'T SAVE SERVER OPTIONS... Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:44:16 -0700 Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "BUG REPOET - GAME DOESN'T SAVE SERVER OPTIONS...", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#39753). Please include the string: (PR#39753) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, - I STILL CANNOT GET THE GAME TO SAVE SERVER OPTIONS, EVERY NEW GAME I START HAS ONLY THE DEFAULT OPTIONS AND IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE OPTIONS I SET STAY PERSISTENT FROM GAME TO GAME. PLEASE FIX!! BUG TRACKER IS NOT ALLOWING GUEST LOGINS SO HERE YOU ARE!! THANK YOU FOR FUN LOOKING GAME!! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39754) RE: LAST 4 BUG REPORTS - MY SETUP IS...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39754 > REGARDING THE FOUR BUG REPORTS - MY SETUP IS WIN XP SP2 LATEST PATCHES, AMD DUALCORE, FIREFOX 2007, FREECIV 210BETA6. I WOULD ALSO SEND YOU SERVER OPTIONS I SET, BUT GAME DOES NOT SAVE THESE OPTIONS!!! SO HERE ARE SOME FROM MEMORY: SINGLE PLAYER, MAX PLAYERS 30, MAP SIZE LARGEST 29, TOPOLOGY 15 (DOES NO WORK), 1X1 ISLANDS TRUE, POLE SEPARATE TRUE, EARTH LIKE, TEMP 55, LAND 33, HILLS 33, INLAND WATER 33, SPECIAL RESOURCES 500, TRIBE HUTS 500; UNITS cdwwx, UNHAPPY CITY SIZE 3, HIGHER UNHAPPY 11, CITY MIN DISTANCE 3, ALLOW CITY NAMES 3, MIN CIVIL WAR 11; GOLD 55; BUILDING DESTRUCTION 11%, MOVE INTO 11%, AUTO-ATTACK TRUE, REDUCE POP 15, BORDERS 0, UNITS NOT = UNHAPPINESS FALSE, BARBARIANS 4, ONSET -4000, SPIES 77%, CONTACT LOST 11, REBUILD CAP FALSE; INITIAL TECH 1, ALL 3 TECH PENALTIES 11%. NOTE: WHY HAVE YOU'ALL DECIDED TO HIDE STUFF LIKE THE SAVE-GAME FILE NAME??? I LIKE TO SET THIS EVERY TIME, HOW DO I CHANGE THESE HIDDEN SERVER OPTIONS IN SINGLE PLAYER GAMES?? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39752) BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39752 > I STILL I CANNOT GET THE GAME TO RUN IN ISO-HEX (MAP TOPOLOGY INDEX 15) PLEASE FIX FEATURE TO WORK. CANNOT LOGIN TO BUG TRACKER SO HERE YOU GO! THANK FOR FUN LOOKING GAME! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39751) BUG REPORT - CAN'T SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39751 > REGARDING THIS BUG REPORT - MY SETUP IS WIN XP SP2 LATEST PATCHES, AMD DUALCORE, FIREFOX 2007, FREECIV 210BETA6. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "The default queue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39751) AutoReply: BUG REPORT - CAN'T SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP... Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:32:42 -0700 Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "BUG REPORT - CAN'T SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP...", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#39751). Please include the string: (PR#39751) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, - STILL CANNOT SEE TOP MENU BAR IN WINXP WHEN WE HAVE OUR TASKBAR AT TOP OF DESKTOP, FREECIV DOES NOT ALLOW THIS TO WORK, FREECIV ONLY ALLOWS TASKBAR TO BE AT BOTTOM OF DESKTOP, PLEASE FIX THIS UNREASONABLE GUI ANOMALY ASAP!!! CAN'T LOGIN TO BUG TRACKER SO HERE YOU GO! THANK YOU FOR GREAT FUN GAME! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39753) BUG REPOET - GAME DOESN'T SAVE SERVER OPTIONS...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39753 > I STILL CANNOT GET THE GAME TO SAVE SERVER OPTIONS, EVERY NEW GAME I START HAS ONLY THE DEFAULT OPTIONS AND IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE OPTIONS I SET STAY PERSISTENT FROM GAME TO GAME. PLEASE FIX!! BUG TRACKER IS NOT ALLOWING GUEST LOGINS SO HERE YOU ARE!! THANK YOU FOR FUN LOOKING GAME!! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39752) BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39752 > Okay, i found the way FreeCiv does this, however, there should be an easier way to switch tilesets within the game or as an option at the start of game, the CMD line -t flag is a bit old fashioned to say the least! Considering FreeCiv has come this far it should get some attention to this important detail. IMHO. Thanks for a great looking game! Please add this BUG REPORT to all the other people who find the workarounds are in the FAQs. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "The default queue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39752) AutoReply: BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX... Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:37:29 -0700 Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "BUG REPORT - CAN'T RUN GAME AS ISO-HEX...", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#39752). Please include the string: (PR#39752) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, - I STILL I CANNOT GET THE GAME TO RUN IN ISO-HEX (MAP TOPOLOGY INDEX 15) PLEASE FIX FEATURE TO WORK. CANNOT LOGIN TO BUG TRACKER SO HERE YOU GO! THANK FOR FUN LOOKING GAME! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39754) BUG REPORT - WHY HAS FREECIV DECIDED TO HIDE SERVER OPTIONS...
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39754 > REGARDING THE FOUR BUG REPORTS - I ADDED THE NEEDED INFO ALREADY IN EMAIL REPLY. THE ONLY Q I HAVE REMAINING IS: WHY HAS FREECIV DECIDED TO HIDE SERVER OPTIONS LIKE THE SAVE-GAME FILE NAME??? I LIKE TO SET THIS EVERY TIME, HOW DO I CHANGE THESE HIDDEN SERVER OPTIONS IN SINGLE PLAYER GAMES?? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "The default queue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (PR#39754) AutoReply: RE: LAST 4 BUG REPORTS - MY SETUP IS... Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 02:15:13 -0700 Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "RE: LAST 4 BUG REPORTS - MY SETUP IS...", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of (PR#39754). Please include the string: (PR#39754) in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message. Thank you, - REGARDING THE FOUR BUG REPORTS - MY SETUP IS WIN XP SP2 LATEST PATCHES, AMD DUALCORE, FIREFOX 2007, FREECIV 210BETA6. I WOULD ALSO SEND YOU SERVER OPTIONS I SET, BUT GAME DOES NOT SAVE THESE OPTIONS!!! SO HERE ARE SOME FROM MEMORY: SINGLE PLAYER, MAX PLAYERS 30, MAP SIZE LARGEST 29, TOPOLOGY 15 (DOES NO WORK), 1X1 ISLANDS TRUE, POLE SEPARATE TRUE, EARTH LIKE, TEMP 55, LAND 33, HILLS 33, INLAND WATER 33, SPECIAL RESOURCES 500, TRIBE HUTS 500; UNITS cdwwx, UNHAPPY CITY SIZE 3, HIGHER UNHAPPY 11, CITY MIN DISTANCE 3, ALLOW CITY NAMES 3, MIN CIVIL WAR 11; GOLD 55; BUILDING DESTRUCTION 11%, MOVE INTO 11%, AUTO-ATTACK TRUE, REDUCE POP 15, BORDERS 0, UNITS NOT = UNHAPPINESS FALSE, BARBARIANS 4, ONSET -4000, SPIES 77%, CONTACT LOST 11, REBUILD CAP FALSE; INITIAL TECH 1, ALL 3 TECH PENALTIES 11%. NOTE: WHY HAVE YOU'ALL DECIDED TO HIDE STUFF LIKE THE SAVE-GAME FILE NAME??? I LIKE TO SET THIS EVERY TIME, HOW DO I CHANGE THESE HIDDEN SERVER OPTIONS IN SINGLE PLAYER GAMES?? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#38558) [patch] client segfault during automove with 30 players and 2 pirates
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=38558 > I don't have that save game set anymore. Sorry. :(I suppose I'll need to unpatch my client so I can get the error again. I don't play much lately. At 2 hr/turn I don't have the time. :/ Either way, though, the client should be patched. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. P.S. I can't seem to log in as guest at bugs.freeciv.org so I can't compare against 39392. ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39677) freeciv crashes while updating unit
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39677 > I am running Freeciv version 2.1.0-beta6 (beta version) gui-sdl I got the following error when trying to upgrade a unit: civclient 2: Using Video Output: x11 2: 480, 27, 0 2: area.h = 410 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 civclient: repodlgs.c:171: popup_upgrade_unit_callback: Assertion `(&ut1) != ((void *)0) && (utype_by_number((&ut1)->index) == (&ut1))' failed. Aborted The game died :( I am running Freeciv version 2.1.0-beta6 (beta version) gui-sdl I got the following error when trying to upgrade a unit: civclient 2: Using Video Output: x11 2: 480, 27, 0 2: area.h = 410 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 2: 768, 27, 0 2: area.h = 614 civclient: repodlgs.c:171: popup_upgrade_unit_callback: Assertion `(&ut1) != ((void *)0) && (utype_by_number((&ut1)->index) == (&ut1))' failed. Aborted The game died :( ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39530) Wonders don't allow units
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39530 > Marko Lindqvist wrote: > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39530 > > > On 23/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> With rndCiv i use Wonders to define special races, >>> ie if you build "The Elves" wonder you can build Elvish units. >>> >>> I found that this didn't work, so i made building "The Elves" >>> allowed you to build "Elveshome" in your cities which allowed >>> you to build Elvish units. >>> >>> It would be simpler for me, and prolly for the code, if Wonders >>> could allow certain units to be built, either on a City, Island, >>> Nation, or Planet wide basis. >>> >>> This wouldn't affect the default rulesets, but would allow more >>> complexity in mods. >> Ive looked through the code, and i find that the functions that check >> whether a unit can be built... >> >>common/city.c:490 can_build_unit >> - calls can_build_unit_direct & can_player_build_unit_direct >> >>common/city.c:463 can_build_unit_direct >> - calls can_player_build_unit_direct >> >>common/unittypes.c:503 can_player_build_unit_direct >> - calls can_player_build_improvement_direct >> >> end up calling... >> >>common/improvement.c:312 can_player_build_improvement_direct >> >> which returns false, if the improvement is a wonder & the wonder has >> been built. > > Actual problem is that unit improvement requirement has no ruleset > defined range. Building is always required in "City" range. This is > what we usually want for normal buildings, and for some wonders. > Just changing hardcoded range to be "Player" for wonders would > replace bug with another. Do we want *all* the wonders to provide unit > building abilities in all cities? > > > - ML > > Having made a lot of rulesets for rndCiv, ive never wanted to allow a unit to be buildable globally by everybody if a Wonder existed. Sometimes ive wanted a unit to be buildable globally by the Wonder owner, but handle that by having another building be buildable if you own the wonder, that building allows the unit to be built. Mostly i want the Wonder to have the same usage as ordinary impr_req buildings. If the wonder is in the city, and not obsolete, the unit is buildable. That's more than we can do right now, it keeps the standard impr_req usage, it doesn't break impr_req expectations (ie, it's taken me a long time to notice the problem), it would make rndCiv much better, and it could be extended later on if required. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39530) Wonders don't allow units
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39530 >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39530 >
> With rndCiv i use Wonders to define special races,
> ie if you build "The Elves" wonder you can build Elvish units.
>
> I found that this didn't work, so i made building "The Elves"
> allowed you to build "Elveshome" in your cities which allowed
> you to build Elvish units.
>
> It would be simpler for me, and prolly for the code, if Wonders
> could allow certain units to be built, either on a City, Island,
> Nation, or Planet wide basis.
>
> This wouldn't affect the default rulesets, but would allow more
> complexity in mods.
Ive looked through the code, and i find that the functions that check
whether a unit can be built...
common/city.c:490 can_build_unit
- calls can_build_unit_direct & can_player_build_unit_direct
common/city.c:463 can_build_unit_direct
- calls can_player_build_unit_direct
common/unittypes.c:503 can_player_build_unit_direct
- calls can_player_build_improvement_direct
end up calling...
common/improvement.c:312 can_player_build_improvement_direct
which returns false, if the improvement is a wonder & the wonder has
been built.
Which means that a unit that's impr_req is a wonder will never be able
to be built as can_player_build_improvement_direct() will return false.
It seems that can_player_build_improvement_direct() is used for two
purposes, to check if a building can be built & to check if a unit can
be built.
im not a c coder, but my initial solution..
can_player_build_improvement_direct {
X = main code
Z = wonder check
}
becomes...
can_player_build_improvement_direct_main {
X
}
can_player_build_improvement_direct {
can_player_build_improvement_direct_main()
Z
}
Tests that come from unit functions use
can_player_build_improvement_direct_main()
Tests that come from building functions use
an_player_build_improvement_direct()
or something like that
-billy
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39582) 2.0.9: crash at end of turn
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 > On 8/18/07, Christian Prochaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 > > > As a side note, when running the server separately, it showed this output: > > 1: Dangerous danger[0] (20180936) in Bethlehem. Beware of overflow. Dangerous danger? Sounds dangerous :) Possibly because of global warming? On 8/18/07, Christian Prochaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 >As a side note, when running the server separately, it showed this output: 1: Dangerous danger[0] (20180936) in Bethlehem. Beware of overflow.Dangerous danger? Sounds dangerous :)Possibly because of global warming? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39582) 2.0.9: crash at end of turn
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 > On 8/18/07, Christian Prochaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 > > > backtrace: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. ok, so it's a real bug. I loaded the savegame into 2.1.0, suddenly almost all cities were in revolt, and had different improvements than those visible in 1.9. I also noticed granaries as possible upgrades, but these were obsolete. I clicked end of turn, no crash but end of game since it's 2001. thanks, Chris On 8/18/07, Christian Prochaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 >backtrace:Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. ok, so it's a real bug.I loaded the savegame into 2.1.0, suddenly almost all cities were in revolt, and had different improvements than those visible in 1.9. I also noticed granaries as possible upgrades, but these were obsolete. I clicked end of turn, no crash but end of game since it's 2001.thanks,Chris ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39582) Forward of moderated message
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39582 >
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 18, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host rt.freeciv.org [207.158.49.132]: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
User unknown
-- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. --
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189])
by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
(Exim 4.63)
id 1IMPsF-0008QB-Vs
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:06:01 -0500
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so607653rvb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=hVLi+wHRVOu2j7qec/3t748e3n+MXnYKysMsmnVlsyqn7I8PAUWSKjGe/3yOMn+p5mEAc5FHFcZ47My+6w9Xi2ay+BttKLODNO1XZDcz852jQwDQSyuIxV/KJukO16Q+60KHFuVGFt8Shgf7NOelh/B3W2hdjFwyyi6A/6QLYWM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=AKX3kSm7z0kxTiG7nyJhQRCHylK/W+h89DbzR9LGoGNb0UdsaSfaSxCy3PceTTZY1ODKU42OcwKGgkkL+ZMECShEAQxBk56KRyYuwTWe6WdFoZV+dHLdmnOC8NcGw2hctyk6D2kLTZGGn20JdAaM90Z/iGAvRcQpwM7EUwfQmuk=
Received: by 10.140.186.18 with SMTP id j18mr1806767rvf.1187449557317;
Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.98.16 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:05:57 +0200
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Saved game crashes freeciv
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_Part_43567_4668371.1187449557279"
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.6): HTML_00_10=0.642, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sat, 18 Aug 2007
10:06:01 -0500
--=_Part_43567_4668371.1187449557279
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
I had a freeciv saved game that I could load, but upon clicking End turn,
freeciv 2.0.9 would crash eventually.
In order to see whether the problem was solved in a newer version I
installed 2.1.0.beta4. I first uninstalled 2.0.9, this action of
courseresulted in all my saved games being deleted.. not very nice. A decent
app asks first before deleting anything user-created like saved games/
projects etc, so that's something to fix right there.
So, unfortunately, I don't have a saved game to send you. The year was
around 1985, I was playing british on a high res map of europe. I was
winning, so had loads of units (>500),
and loads of cities as well. Maybe a memory problem? I think the original
civ 2, as well as Alpha Centauri, had the same problem. Very frustrating
since you can't end a game.
I'm runnng XP with highest patch level on a laptop with 1.5 Ghz Celeron and
1 gb of memory.
take care,
Chris.
--=_Part_43567_4668371.1187449557279
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,I had a freeciv saved game that I could load, but upon clicking
End turn, freeciv 2.0.9 would crash eventually.In order to see whether
the problem was solved in a newer version I installed 2.1.0.beta4. I first
uninstalled
2.0.9, this action of courseresulted in all my saved games being deleted..
not very nice. A decent app asks first before deleting anything user-created
like saved games/ projects etc, so that's something to fix right there.
So, unfortunately, I don't have a saved game to send you. The year
was around 1985, I was playing british on a high res map of europe. I was
winning, so had loads of units (>500),and loads of cities as well.
Maybe a memory problem? I think the original civ 2, as well as Alpha
Centauri, had the same problem. Very frustrating since you can't end a
game.
I'm runnng XP with highest patch level on a laptop with 1.5 Ghz
Celeron and 1 gb of memory.take care,Chris.
--=_Part_43567_4668371.1187449557279--
-- Forwarded message --From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 18, 2007 5:06 PMSubject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to senderTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]This message was created automatically by mail delivery so
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#20167) 2.1 aqueduct
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=20167 > It was fixed, no need to worry. It was fixed, no need to worry. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#20936) unforgiving AI doesn't accept any treaty
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=20936 > Daniel Markstedt wrote: > It is a known problem that AI often become very hostile without apparent > reason and will never ever 'forgive' you during the game. The reason for > this behavior, is that all AI players play the game to win (i.e. > exterminate everyone else) so if they see you taking the lead (top > score) or a member of a powerful alliance, they will become perpetually > hostile towards you. > > This is IMHO a quite depressing play style and effectively removes much > of the fun in player vs. AI games for me. The most annoying part, I > think, is the fact that far-away civilizations you meet late in the game > are already in this terminator-mood - I guess through alliances with > players hostile towards you. I think the AI's would be harder if they were more forgiving. Let me explain. Once many versions ago, i played a rev with new ai code, in this everyone was friendly to everyone else, and competition for city sites was fierce, but polite. After a couple of hundred years i got bored with the peace, and declared war on one weak & annoying neighbour, suddenly everyone was at war with me, the whole world! Obviously this behaviour was too intelligent, and besides it destroyed gameplay. But it got me thinking. In moments of weakness, i'll offer peace to some ai im thrashing, and it won't accept!! How stupid is that. It's not even trying to buy a bit of time, to rebuild & wait till im bogged down with my back turned. The AI, should ALWAYS sue for peace, if being beaten. Most of the time, the ai's should be at peace, if they can be, unless they really really desire war (ie, they think they can grab a city in the next few turns). Or they are a long way away and want to sink your ships. If there is no immediate tactical utility, to being at war, they should be at peace. This means, that as the player is generally superior tactically, they won't be getting armies destroyed all the time. If you're not winning and you may as well not be fighting. This means more ai's survive, with larger nations, longer. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39543) Cities compete over Small Wonders
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39543 > Hi rndCiv uses Small Wonders, for things like Colleges of Magic that can produce Magicians etc. Often these units are Unique. What ive found is that the AI will build a Small Wonder, build the specialty unit, and then other cities in the same nation will start building that Small Wonder, If they succeed the new Small Wonder destroys the old one. What often ends up happening is that many cities spend huge amounts of resources rebuilding the Small Wonder, that they a) never really build anything else, and b) the units that the Small Wonder allows never have a chance to get built. My suggestion for the AI code... If a Nation already has a Small Wonder, don't rebuild it anywhere else, that's the easy fix, and it'll prolly be right 99% of the time. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39544) Sealanes
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39544 > Hi One trick i use in Freeciv is Sealanes. Sealanes are sentrying one or more ferries to create a path across the ocean. This aids management because if Sealanes connect islands i can just tell a unit to 'goto' some other island, and it finds it's own way, using the Sealanes. Of course the Sealanes become a juicy target for sea hunters. The current AI tends to build too many ships, and then has trouble using them efficiently. I think that if the AI creates Sealanes between island it's interested in (finding shortest routes to park some ships), it'll a) be more productive at getting units to their destinations, b) more efficient in cpu cycles, as there is less ferry code to execute, and c) make the game more fun as you'll notice that an AI enemy is setting up Sealanes which will become more important targets to disrupt, and will explicate their naval strategy better. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39542) Cities Build too Many Expensive Buildings
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39542 > Hi Ive noticed that later on in a game, the AI's start to build Airports, lots of Airports, and other expensive buildings - especially in rndCiv where there can be so many more expensive buildings available. This is ok, until the Nation has put one Airport in every town, even when the towns are 3 squares away and connected by railway, in the middle of a island, a very long way away from any enemy. Ive found that this causes taxes to overtime got to 100% and science output disappears. The effect of this is that the AI's get to a certain tech level and then stagnate. The solution is prolly quite complex, but the AI needs to penalize building too many expensive to maintain buildings. This means taking into account what other cities are doing. Rough suggestions... * (where C = yearly building maintenance cost) allow AI to build in 1/C cities, So All cities can build 1gold buildings, but only 1/3 of cities build a 3gold airport. This is fairly arbitrary, but may get the AI out of the trap. * decrease want by some formula, that takes into account... - how useful building is - how expensive the building is to maintain - how much income the city produces - how may other cities nearby have this building -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39531) Partisan should be just another flag
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39531 > Hi The Partisan flag has two special requirements... 1) one unit must have it 2) only one unit can have it This makes things a wee bit complicated for rndCiv. My request is that the Partisan flag becomes just a flag for indicating which units may become Partisans, with these semantics... 1) it's ok to have no Partisan units 2) Partisan units appearing still depends on Inspire_Partisans effect - which becomes generalised in the effects.ruleset 3) it's ok to have many Partisan units, the units that appear will be determined by what's available & not obsoleted. This will make rndCiv rulesets easier to generate, and will allow more complex Partisan effects... * Refugees * high tech 4GW Partisans * Elf freedom fighters This should simplify the code handling Partisans, and doesn't affect the default ruleset. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39533) New Unit Flag - Once
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39533 > Hi I propose a new unit flag - Once This flag is like Unique, but even more limited. The type of unit may only be built once (per Nation). Once it is gone, the player may not build another. This allows powerful units that can be used once, very useful for rndCiv and other modpacks. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39530) Wonders don't allow units
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39530 > Hi With rndCiv i use Wonders to define special races, ie if you build "The Elves" wonder you can build Elvish units. I found that this didn't work, so i made building "The Elves" allowed you to build "Elveshome" in your cities which allowed you to build Elvish units. Of course, if you build an "Elveshome" and lose "The Elves" you can still build Elvish units. If you conquer a city with a "Elveshome" you can build Elves. It's fiddly and annoying, but i can live with it. But i also had, "Lizardman Nests" as wonders, but couldn't build Lizardmen warriors unless i create a City Improvement that can only be built with the Wonder, to allow the units to be built - it's ugly. I also wanted special case units, like.. Foreign Legion: requires Eiffel Tower Men In Black: requires NSA Evil Magician: requires Temple of Doom Angel: requires Holy City etc, It would be simpler for me, and prolly for the code, if Wonders could allow certain units to be built, either on a City, Island, Nation, or Planet wide basis. This wouldn't affect the default rulesets, but would allow more complexity in mods. Civ ties special units to a Nation, i think this is stupid. Ie, Germany and the Panzer, the real reason Germany had the Panzer is not that it's inherent in their national makeup, but that tanks were new and Germany having being beaten in WWI engaged in a complete rethink of their military doctrine - it's context dependent. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39534) Split up Diplomat/Spy abilities
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39534 > hi I propose that Diplomat/Spy abilities be split up into more flags, each one handling some special ability - Seeing inside a city, bribing a unit, poisoning a city, bribing a city, establishing an embassy, stealing a tech, sabotaging an improvement etc. To keep config files manageable and backwards compatible, the traditional Diplomat & Spy flags can become macros that expand out to the new subset of Flags, or however the config parser would best handle this. The reason for this is to allow rndCiv & modpack authors to create new units, that aren't just Diplomats with new names. -billy ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
