Michael Natterer (mi...@gimp.org) wrote:
> everybody who wants to come to the camp
> should buy a ticket until *tommorow* the
> 20th of July:
I ordered mine a while ago already and I can only wholeheartedly
recommend this event.
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de htt
Martin Nordholts (ense...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm trying hard to find time hacking on GIMP, and not having to waste
> time on GObject C boiler plate means a lot to me. At first I was
> thinking "what the hell, I'll just come up with the the damn
> boilerplate code manually then". But right after I
Martin Nordholts (ense...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2011/3/27 Michael Natterer :
> > And this is *exactly* the problem. We would end up with programmers
> > that quickly learnt vala, having no clue about GObject. That's
> > absolutely horrible.
>
> How is it a problem that our code becomes so easy that
Ofnuts (ofn...@laposte.net) wrote:
> Why is gimp_vectors_bezier_stroke_lineto(vectors, stroke_id, x0, y0)
> (and Stroke.lineto(x,y)) working backwards? If I add a lineto() to the
> stroke, the point of origin
> (the one returned by gimp_vectors_stroke_get_point_at_dist(0,..))
> changes... I'm su
Charlie De (charlieco...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> Could you please demonstrate your sincerity by escalating the 'bug' to
> critical? It would demonstrate commitment to really having this in
> 2.10, rather than just 'looking at it'. I think you owe it to the
> developer to make that gesture at the very l
Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
> > For Gimp itself there is a bug report on this issue at
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639203
> >
> > I guess I'll commit the patch attac
Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@gmail.com) wrote:
> While testing gimp with cppcheck I saw a lot of warnings caused by the
> usage of scanf and fscanf without specifying a width limit.
For Gimp itself there is a bug report on this issue at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639203
I guess I
Mathias Lindner (monocero...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> Can I add something?
Sure. :)
> All fine to now, two controversial opinions that may be solved by some
> trade-off... But I still have to give some critique: I have experienced
> similar incidents quite a few times. Again, you may all be ri
sigetch (sige...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Well, you don't permit the GIMP to have the toolbars even if it is
> OPTIONAL and it doesn't replace or overwrite any existing GUI policy ?
Each and every optional thing is a burden. Even if disabled it clutters
the preferences dialog, it makes inconsistent Use
Joao S. O. Bueno (gwid...@mpc.com.br) wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:58 AM, wrote:
> > (I also saw, that what on the GUI are Paths internally are called
> > vectors. To make things better undesrstandable, it would make sense
> > to give things the same name... but maybe there is more to vecto
Mirza Husadzic (mirza.husad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Can you please open a bug-report and attach the most simple test case
> > that you can come up with? We need a small .svg file that illustrates
> > the problem. I am pretty sure that the problem can easily be fixed then.
>
> Here it is: https
Mirza Husadzic (mirza.husad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Using which rsvg function calls exactly?
>
> I checked the 'librsvg' and yes, there is no API exposed to satisfy this.
> Maybe the 'librsvg' can be subtly redesigned to expose this API? ;-)
I did not look at the librsvg internals, but interpret
Mirza Husadzic (mirza.husad...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I think that better solution is that 'librsvg' do the parsing job and that
> GIMP can fetch points from the lib to render.
Using which rsvg function calls exactly?
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de http://simon.bud
Rupert Weber (g...@leguanease.org) wrote:
> D50 vs D65
> ==
> Another question during transformation to Lab is, which illuminant or
> reference white to use.
>
> That part, I don't quite understand yet. Does that depend on the source
> data, or simply on how the monitor is calibrated?
W
Hi all.
At LGM we threw some ideas around for Gimp-Merchandizing.
I am a little bit involved in this, since the company I work for -
kernel concepts - has a lot of experience with doing these things for
various free software projects. I am usually the person, preparing
artwork provided by the pro
Hi all.
Thanks to all attendants to the LGM 2010, it was a tremendous
conference, I enjoyed it a lot.
And thanks to the organizers for coming up with the "note taking"
service: for our GIMP BOF agnez did jot down what was discussed, thanks
a lot for this.
I mostly left the notes unedited, except
Oliver Bandel (oli...@first.in-berlin.de) wrote:
> I'm new on the developer list.
Welcome.
> I would like to help in pushing into the direction of overcoming the
> 8-Bit limitation. Also interesting would be for me to have more
> knowledge on the plugin-stuff; I had already written some littl
David Gowers (00a...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM, peter sikking wrote:
> > can somebody tell me why we have a tiny replacement for the menu bar
> > right below the menu bar?
>
> The obvious answer here is that it's visible when the menubar is not.
Well, it has been introd
Jordan Stinson (jordan.stinso...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm trying to hack gimp. For my purposes, I want to be notified when certain
> actions become sensitive, or insensitive. The way I wanted to do this was to
> store the actions I wanted to keep track of and connect to the UIManager's
> update sign
Hi all.
I am sorry, but I forgot about the notes I took at the LGM2009 GIMP bof.
I'll just send them around in the state I took them during the BOF in
the hope that they are useful. If you have the impression that there is
stuff missing or that I misrepresent some of the discussions then please
f
Jordan Stinson (jordan.stinso...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,I'm trying (for starters) to make the hue saturation tool visible in the
> toolbox.
Uhm, actually there is no need to start hacking for this:
1) Go to Windows -> Dockable Dialogs -> Tools
2) toggle the "eye" icon next to the hue-saturation t
Håvard Tørring (htoer...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a 3dconnexion space navigator that I would love to be able to use to
> pan and zoom the images in gimp.
Yay, I have one of these as well. Please hack on that :-)
> The problem with this approach is that gimp ignores the value of the
Graeme Gill (grae...@argyllcms.com) wrote:
> peter sikking wrote:
>
> > what we really must avoid is the old confusion that users think
> > that what they see in the window is just the jpg. it is not,
> > else there would be no possibility to add a layer, a path, etc.
>
> If they've not actually
Jay Smith (j...@jaysmith.com) wrote:
> On 06/10/2009 04:33 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
> > gg (g...@catking.net) wrote:
> >> Subsequent Save as png should automatically set the default file name to
> >> /path/foo.png .
> >
> > *Please* try to be exact in thi
gg (g...@catking.net) wrote:
> Subsequent Save as png should automatically set the default file name to
> /path/foo.png .
*Please* try to be exact in this discussion. You *cannot* "Save as PNG",
you can only "Export as PNG". The *only* format you can "Save" to is XCF
and its compressed variants.
Liam R E Quin (l...@holoweb.net) wrote:
> [...] Experienced users are
> unlikely to want to overwrite the original jpeg, because they
> know it loses data.
Well, no. The "Export to " Menupoint is exactly for the
usecase that someone opens a jpeg, does some quick adjustments and fully
intentionall
Hi all.
Some random thoughts from me. Not sure if they form a coherent picture
though... :)
peter sikking (pe...@mmiworks.net) wrote:
> [Liam wrote]
> > Consider
> >
> > (1) open typewriter.jpg that came in from my camera
> > (2) do some fun editing
> > (3) save-as to go to typewriter2.xcf.gz
>
Jackson Tam (j...@sditech.com) wrote:
> We want to simplify things so that a kid could :
Actually you might want to have a look at tuxpaint, which seems to have
the same target audience as you.
Hope this helps,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de http://simon.budig.de/
_
Lars Lindley (lind...@coyote.org) wrote:
> I usually follow the http://developer.gimp.org/ChangeLog site to see
> what's
> happening in gimp.
> The last update there was on april 13:th and I guess there has been
> _some_ work
> done since then...
> Has that site been discontinued or has there actu
Nathael Pajani (g...@nathael.net) wrote:
> Right. Because I do not see why there are now two windows at startup.
> Yes, you pointed to the wiki explanation already. It seems you are all OK for
> this empty unuseful window at Gimp startup
Please don't confuse your opinion with facts. This window i
Sampo Niskanen (spnis...@cc.hut.fi) wrote:
> The point is changing the canvas size, but leaving the layers uncropped.
> The current crop tool always crops the layers to the selected area, so you
> cannot fine-tune the position afterwards - previously there was the option
> of cropping only the c
Jim Michaels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Akima spline curves give drawing freedom, at least some kind of
> interpolating spline curve where you can just simply lay the points
> down and the curve follows along the points - I have a hard time
> getting bezier curves to do what I want. It's like Al
Maciej Pilichowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > But even taking him into account the current model
> > has served us well for the last years and there has been very few
> > discussion about this specific problem, if it cropped u
Maciej Pilichowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
> transparency _also_ as a color.
I don't think that this is a sensible approach in general.
We currently use alpha to do proper antialiasing, compositing existing
photos on top of each o
Cristian Secară ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:12:53 +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
>
> > http://www.levien.com/gimp/jargon.html:
> > * eek An expression of shock. Even better is to make Burrito eek. He
> >does it so nicely. Derived from "
Cristian Secară ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> A language string says this:
> "EEK: can't undo"
> What is EEK ?
http://www.levien.com/gimp/jargon.html:
* eek An expression of shock. Even better is to make Burrito eek. He
does it so nicely. Derived from "Eeek, a German", the standard
greetin
Joao S. O. Bueno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> That said, can I enlist you as Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors?
> - Simon?
Sorry, I am buried in work and most likely won't be able to mentor
adequately. Sorry again :-(
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://si
Ettore Pasquini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 3/2/08 8:46 AM, "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 19:16 -0800, Ettore Pasquini wrote:
> >
> >> It turned out to be a couple wrong assumptions on my side. First the linux
> >> device file /dev/input/eventN was for
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 19:16 -0800, Ettore Pasquini wrote:
> > After fixing that I was able to map the device actions and it works!
> > Panning is pretty good, although there is no acceleration (moving the device
> > hard or soft makes no difference).
>
> D
Hi Ettore.
Ettore Pasquini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I work for 3Dconnexion (a Logitech company) and we make 3D input devices.
> We also care about popular 2D apps that could use the high sensitivity of
> our SpaceNavigator for panning and zooming. GIMP was under our radar and
> now we are con
barney holmes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Does MS Direct X input include Midi device support ? My USB Midi
> device and normal Midi did not show up in the list ... but maybe they
> can be supported through Direct X ?
There is a MIDI module for Gimp on Linux where you can map Midi events
to Gimp a
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Simon Budig wrote:
> > Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I'm currently interested in looking into this, mostly because I think
> >> this needs a clean solution before I will be able to cleanly fin
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm currently interested in looking into this, mostly because I think
> this needs a clean solution before I will be able to cleanly finalize
> the GimpRectangleTool.
I have a prototypeish parser running here, specified with yacc:
$ ./parseunit
2m + 3
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 10:25 -0400, Daniel Falk wrote:
> > There doesn't seem to be a way to temporarily switch to the zoom tool
> > while a button is pressed. For example if I hold down ctrl + space, it
> > would switch to the zoom tool, I could click-drag
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 21:04 -0700, Barton wrote:
> > That's the gotcha that got me on this one. Another minor issue is that
> > immediately after running draw_circle, the stroke appears in the layer
> > dialog but it does not appear in the image itself u
Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've tried translating the draw_circle script-fu to python, and also
> checked the script-fu itself in my 2.3.18 installation without success;
> the circular path is created but it isn't stroked.
>
> Simon, did you write your sample script-fu for 2.3.19?
I
rs image vectors -1)
(gimp-vectors-bezier-stroke-new-ellipse vectors (/ w 2) (/ w 2) (/ w
3) (/ w 3) 0)
(gimp-edit-stroke-vectors layer vectors)
)
)
(script-fu-register "script-fu-draw-circle"
"Draw Circle"
&
David Gowers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Anyway, if you give a link to a paper describing the exact workings of
> the algorithym, then it's much more likely that something will get
> done in relation to it.
It seems to be fairly straightforward and the results are beautiful. The
related paper is
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 374854 possible optimizations in Script-Fu
>
> This one can possibly be closed or moved from the milestone. Waiting
> for a comment from Kevin.
[...]
> 438997 Output on stdout when using script-fu console
>
> Looks like a low-hanging fruit. Some he
Guillermo Espertino ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
> > Perhaps you mean supersampling?
>
> Yes, it must be. I'm using a spanish localization of Gimp and try to
> guess the correct translation.
> Is there a command line option to launch gimp in english (just once, not
> perman
Alexandre Prokoudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - Will it be possible since GIMP doesn't use Cairo yet?
It does implicitely, since it already depends on a GTK+ version that
depends on cairo.
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/
_
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> With the introduction of helper functions like
>
> void gimp_rectangle_tool_constrain_aspect (GimpRectangleTool
> *rectangle_tool, gdouble aspect, const gchar *apply_on_x, const gchar
> *apply_on_y)
> {
> /* apply_on_x may be "x1", "x2" or "center_x"
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't know if everyone of the GIMP development team is as annoyed of
> Carol as I am, but I know that there are quite a few people who are.
I for sure am annoyed as well. I absolutely hate the idea of driving
someone out of the project and still worry ab
tao frank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I know that some data of plugin can be stored in GIMP's pool by the function
> below:
>
> gimp_set_data ("some_data", &mydata, sizeof (MyData));
>
> But how big can this data be? If I want to store a very big data, say, a
> color mask of an image, what shoul
Hi Terry.
Michael Terry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> After presenting ingimp (http://www.ingimp.org) at LGM a week ago, it
> was suggested we port it to the 2.3.x developer branch. The port is
> almost complete, but I'm trying to understand a particular change
> between the 2.2.x and 2.3.x code
Renan Birck Pinheiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Em Sáb, 2007-04-14 às 18:37 -0500, Jim Sabatke escreveu:
> > I have a lot of scripts that no longer work under 2.3.x. I
> > understand that gimp has migrated to tiny scheme and variables need
> > to be declared with let or let*. I have tried and t
Christopher Curtis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 3/30/07, David Marrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We already get Gimpshop users coming to the mailing lists asking for
> > help and,
>
> Would it be a good idea to embrace these users as well? Gimpshop may
> be a non-supported hack, but hosting
Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> As brought up earlier, claiming other projects have significantly more
> developers is simply untrue. Please stop spreading FUD.
Oh, btw, "FUD" is another candidate.
AFAIK the term "FUD" has t
Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Actually I also think it was too rude. Let's analyze it:
[...]
> 1. You didn't say "hi".
Oh, come on. A lot of the mails on mailinglists don't include a greeting
if quoting something. I've never perceived that as *rude*.
> 2. You phrased it as a question t
Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > It took me 10 minutes to write.
> >
> > Oh wow. Is it just me or is this really a *lot* of time? Personally I'd
> > consi
Hi.
Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It took me 10 minutes to write.
Oh wow. Is it just me or is this really a *lot* of time? Personally I'd
consider answering 6 "lazy questions" per hour a waste of time.
(Sorry for not replying to all of your mail - this just stuck out to me)
Bye,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:21:23 +0100, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >> It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
> >> to simply remember the person on the other side is still a human
> >> being, is not
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2007 08:11, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > IMHO, refraining from posts like this could greatly improve the
> > > atmosphere of this list.
> > > It is really up to you to help somebody with answerin
Alpár Jüttner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 20:52 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote:
> > > I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in
> > > C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug,
> > > and test it
Alexander Rabtchevich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Raphaël, this IS exactly my point! Why should the global variables be
> prohibited if there is no difference in memory consumption with local
> ones, only additional efforts to a programmer to track all parenthesis.
Because global variables are
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Also your approach is very lame indeed. This discussion wasn't even
> close to coming to an end. It would have been a lot nicer to propose a
> solution instead of wasting time like this.
Please realize that your mails sound very much like you dont really w
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> That should allow us to get all active contributors together in Montreal
> this May. So who is planning to come? It looks like large parts of the
> website have not been updated yet. It would probably be a good idea to
> change that. We will need a list of
Manfred Joerg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It would be nice if the rotate tool could do that for me. It could work this
> way:
> - Click on the left hand size of the horizon
> - Shift-click on the right hand size
> - The rotate tool calculates the angle.
>
> What do you think about my suggestion?
Milos Prudek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> After successfully compiling gimp-2.3.13, on Mandriva 2007.0, Gimp fails to
> run with this error message:
>
> /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/bin/gimp-2.3:
> undefined symbol: gimp_vectors_stroke_type_get_type
>
> Should I file
CTED]>
To: simon budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'm resigning from the GIMP project.
I have come to terms with the fact that there will never be any code of
conduct in this community, and I don't identify with that. For many
years, yosh has been imposing his very particular view
Dream Artist Aspiring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> gimp_install_procedure (
> "plug-in-testp",
> "TestP",
> "A Test Plugin",
> " ",
> " ",
> "2006",
> "_testp",
> "RGB*, GRAY*",
> G
Dream Artist Aspiring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all, I am new to gimp and trying to learn plugins. I wanted to start by
> drawing a circle. So basically,
> for(t=0; t < 360; t++)
> {
>x(t) = cos(t);
>y(t) = sin(t);
>col(t) = black;
>paint col(t) at x(t), y(t) or better; draw a
Alexandre Prokoudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 9/10/06, David Neary wrote:
> >* Proposal for wavelets-based imaging applications in GIMP
> >Divyanshu Vats (Simon Budig)
> >
> >Divyanshu successfully completed jpeg2000 support, and a number of image
>
David Neary ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Proposal for implementing vector layers in the GIMP
> Hendrik Boom(Simon Budig)
>
> Henrik's vector layer code is now in CVS, and in the 2.3.11 release.
> There are some other features which are in planning.
That is not cor
Florent Monnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Some months ago someone on a mailing-list asked how he could change
> the comment of xcf files in order to add licencing informations (such as GPL
> or creative-commons), so as it seems it's not possible from the GUI (maybe we
> all failed on this mai
Florent Monnier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, I'm searching through the CVS web viewer for the XCF specs without success
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/
> could someone tell me in which directory does it resides ?
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/devel-docs/xcf.txt?rev=1.2&view=markup
By
Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Scripsit "Øyvind Kolås" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I cannot use the smudge or blur|sharpen tool, gaussian blur doesn't
> > work neither does unsharp mask, layer masks seems to work but get
> > their alpha thresholded.
>
> Neither of which are something one
Michael Schumacher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It would be nice if everyone who is involved in SoC could provide a
> short status report - the overall progress, maybe some results (screen
> shots are usually very useful :). Or problems, if any.
I am mentoring two projects:
Proposal for implement
Brendan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 02:35, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 13:10 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> > > this is what i learned about how these booths are handled here in the
> > > San Francisco area. to be mailed about their existence and to know
Alexandre Prokoudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >Over the next weeks, we will try to add the remaining missing features
> >and to iron out all the bugs that are blocking the 2.4 release. Any
> >help with that is very much appreciated.
>
> Is the plan to have SoC
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote:
> > That sounds as if you don't clear the layer before you use it for the
> > first time. Layers created from a Plugin are not initialized from the
> > very beginning. They ne
Sebastian Breuers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The plug-in, I'm writing, creates a number of layers, every layer receives an
> object, for example a circle (created by ellipse selection, an selection
> fill), but somewhen, don't know why, the layer contains not only the desired
> circle but also
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >To exaggerate your approach: Wouldn't it be the most usable GIMP if we
> >keep counters for the button presses? And if it turns out that a user
> >uses SHIFT-Click more than a simple click, shouldn't we just switch the
> >behaviour of the button on the
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> If you agree on that, then this improves consistence.
> >
> >I don't agree. First, determining what the "most common use" of a button
> >is, probably is subjective at all. And even if we could determine this
> >in an unambigous way we'd end up basica
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Probably yes, but from what I remember, Shift + Click works in several
> >more parts of GIMP's UI. If so, changing it would break consistence.
>
> I am not sure in what way? Yes, there are other commands that are altered
> by Shift. However, the logi
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >We earlier had it the other way around: Click would create the layers
> >with the defaults, Shift-Click would show the dialog.
> >We then switched it around again, because Shift-Clicking to get the
> >dialog, made the dialog a pretty hidden feature. Mo
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 1. GIMP wants to provide its users with a good workflow, independent and
> unaffected by other similar applications.
> 2. The majority of 'New layer' commands are equal, i.e. users rarely
> changes the properties (width, height, prefilled color, etc)
Philip L. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You've given me another idea, though. Perhaps the path tool could be
> extended so that each node in a path could be a 'keyframe' in the
> stroke, holding brush parameters at that point. This would certainly
> make path stroking more powerful. On top of that,
Philip L. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm considering creating a new brush system for the GIMP as part of the
> Summer of Code in order to make GIMP more suitable to digital painting.
> I've made some contributions to the project before, but it has been a
> while. Can anyone comment on how extensi
Michael J. Hammel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm looking for feedback on this (see below) from both core developers
> as well as casual (infrequent) contributors and end users.
Ok, I guess I am a casual core developer... :)
I'll just drop in some thoughts, not really ordered
> Here is a s
William Skaggs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 4) Vector layers and tools to manipulate them -- allowing adjustable
> rectangle and ellipse shapes, lines with arrow, etc.
Actually my roadmap for vector layers would look something like this:
- create the infrastructure to have vector "styles", i.e.
Gerald Friedland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> However, as far as I understood, there is still an issue: Is GIMP able
> to display non-binary alpha values? I loaded in a PNG that I created
> using the SIOX demonstration Applet and I saw that GIMP binarizes the
> alpha values
This should only ha
digi artist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have just been introduced to GIMP and think it is a great software.
> I would like to be able to customize it i.e. change menu options,
> Toolbox, hide the layer box on startup and change the splash screen.
Just close the layer box and it will stay closed
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> However, I think that when you use GIMP, the taskbar quickly gets bloated
> with lots of images. Would a TDI (Tabbed Document Interface) be very tough
> to implement in GIMP? TDI's have become very popular, and afaik lots of
> people agrees that TDIs
Martin Nordholts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am also a big fan of usability though, and I must wonder why there is a
> menu item named 'Xtns'? From a usability point of view, it is not very
> good...
For hysterical raisins. It has been there forever and we have not yet
found a good place to p
Campbell Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hey Gimp dev's (by the way, how many gimp dev's are there?)
well, that depends on how you define "gimp developer" - there are about
180 people listed in the AUTHORS file. The listed persons have at least
once added something to the GIMP in the last 10 y
Frédéric ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Gimp is OpenSource, and its file format should be open too. And so, well
> documented. Even if it still evolves, it is possible to make something
> without breaking previous rules when adding new features. Maybe by
> providing an complete API, like HDF does.
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > In fact I don't want to ignore selections but to use them in a different
&g
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The selection gets respected when you're using shadow tiles and use
> > gimp_drawable_merge_shadow. You can ignore the selection by not using
> > shadow ti
Joël-Alexis Bialkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My primary hypothesis is that gimp gives the full image (or a square portion
> of it including all selections) when you call gimp_drawable_mask_bounds, and
> that when you write your results using gimp_drawable_update, it just updates
> the selec
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
