Re: 1.1.19-installation fails

2000-04-09 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 8 Apr, Marc Lehmann wrote: Yes, I got the impression from all what I was told: a) msgmerge is not checked for by gettext itself b) binary .mo files are being distributed with the gimp Since I was no gettext expert, I just ate it. But now we know better: a) is wrong, since msgmerge

Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes)

2000-04-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Apr, Marc Lehmann wrote: I think using optional(!) tags (which will be more verbose) will be even more useful: Not much added strain on the programmer, not much strain on translators (we need one more translator for the en mapping). Please note that adding "tags" to the messages will

Re: Gimp Wishes (efficient trivial wishes)

2000-03-31 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 30 Mar, Stanislav Brabec wrote: I18n wishes: -- Please do anything with the fact, that main panel menu with default GTK theme can contain exactly 15 letters. Too few for three items inmost languages. What exactly would you suggest? That's actually a matter for the

Re: Gimp User Installation Dialog.

2000-03-30 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 25 Mar, Blue Lang wrote: A lot of laptops, especially running linux @ 1024x768, will only support 8 bit depth. Dunno if it matters to ya or not. :P Gimping on the plane, ahh. Really? But that's not a limitation of the notebook I hope... The techniques used in notebook LCD's allow normal

Re: Gimp version number in $prefix/lib/gimp/* path names?

2000-03-11 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 10 Mar, Raphael Quinet wrote: P.S.: I identified this problem when I tried to start an old version of the Gimp in order to check why the "Frosty" script was not giving the same results as in 1.0. If anybody knows why this logo script does not produce the same effects as

Re: Why host plug-ins at SourceForge? (Was: I want to develop IPTC-data support for The Gimp.)

2000-02-29 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 26 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: It will also force us to develop tools for the separate compilation of plugins and develop a plugin interface that is versionable The first one is definitely a need but "a plugin interface that is versionable"? We do have versioned libraries ensuring

Re: Testing and integration of The i18n solution(TM)

2000-02-25 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 25 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: Which is exactly what I proposed at the end of my last mail. Despite that I proposed to build up the menu-structure (actually only the strings) in a hash-table before actually creating it. For a new translation function I guess? Would be much faster then

Re: Testing and integration of The i18n solution(TM)

2000-02-25 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 25 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: Don't waste your time at that. I already did that and I tried to explain you why there is no way to hook into that place since GTK+ creates the submenu on the fly. At the time we create the tearoff menu, the submenu is already created. But when the submenu is

Re: Crash in Gimp 1.1.7 on Solaris 8.

2000-02-24 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Feb, Ludovic Poitou wrote: SunOS bondi 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 UltraSPARC-IIi But I haven't compiled with the 64 bit flag on ! A simple program like this : main(){ printf("%d\n", sizeof(unsigned char *)); } Do the plugins work for you? We've got dozens of

Re: Testing and integration of The i18n solution(TM)

2000-02-24 Thread Daniel . Egger
mark owned by Daniel Egger Hey Sven, come on... -- Servus, Daniel

Re: Testing and integration of The i18n solution(TM)

2000-02-24 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 24 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: Eek, yes of course, that does not work any more. There are two ways to solve this: Either we search in the gimp domain if the lookup of the menupath failed (like we used to do (*)) or we move the dummies into the plugins. I prefer the latter, since it is the

Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution

2000-02-23 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: gimp_plugin_add_locale_domain (gchar *domain_name, gchar *domain_path) and can only be called in the query function of a plug-in. The domain_path may optionally be NULL. Proposals for a better name are welcome. I'd recommend

Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution

2000-02-23 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: No, that won't work. Of course you need to hook somewhere into plug_in.c or at least use the plug_in_defs list. Otherwise plug-ins won't be able to register their domain on the first call. Of course you are right, just a braino. The only thing missing now is

Re: Coding style (was: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution)

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 22 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote: I did not like the GNU style at first (especially the space before the opening parenthesis) but now I understand that it is very important to keep a consistent coding style in each project, because it keeps the code manageable and maintainable. So I always

Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 22 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: With the usage of static array and buffer lengths you demonstrated in your patch it will most likely introduce one or two new bugs, but that could easily be hacked up a little cleaner Of course I could have used a linked list, but I'm not sure if it's worth

Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 22 Feb, Manish Singh wrote: True, although we have a couple other inconsistencies already. The coding style needs to be the same as the rest of gimp though. I tried to bring it as near as possible. Of course a lot things could be better It's not that much code, and does fix a

Re: Coding style (was: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution)

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 22 Feb, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: I don't know if this will be useful at all, but the GNOME Programming Guidelines has a snippet for .vimrc to set the Linux kernel indentation style. This is the standard vim style. If you tweak it a bit it may work for GNU indentation style. No,

Re: Coding style (was: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution)

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Then, most probably, you have a very very old or broken version of vim (or maybe you use another editor, or vim in vi-emulation mode). Actually it's the latest stable version of vim. The whole point of these options is to make indentation automatic and

Re: PROPOSAL: New i18n solution

2000-02-22 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: The current solution for the plugins distributed with The GIMP works reasonably good. Really? I wouldn't call "we have to pre-add the menuentries to GIMPs core source otherwise it wouldn't work" working good. Actually my patch doesn't really address those

Re: the .po filename domain

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 21 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK. On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not for

Re: pathsP.h

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 21 Feb, Blue Lang wrote: did that. :) if you have time, would it be possible to get someone with better bandwidth than i to download a clean copy of CVS gimp and see if it builds? Yes, it builds it's in our SuSE internal database i've done distclean and autogen, etc, etc -

Re: An experiment (was Re: Move help menu item...)

2000-02-14 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 13 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: This can be dangerous; you can get a resizing loop if your code isn't carefully written. Window managers can refuse to accept a client resize request or can modify it, which could result in a duel between GIMP and the window manager as the two fight over

Re: An experiment (was Re: Move help menu item...)

2000-02-10 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 10 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote: Flexibility is ok.. but some time create problems. Why don't set fixed sizes x*y to cover all the dimension of toolbar? This could be usefull to have right dimension and good rappresentation. Unfortunately, this is not so simple. Constraining the

Re: gimp i18n == segfault

2000-02-09 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 9 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Since about two weeks, setting LANG to any value results on a segmentation fault on startup. Since I cannot reproduce this (i.e. GIMP works just fine) I'd need more input on this. Your stacktrace seems like it crashes when initialising the help_pages but I

Let's squeeze that i18n bug!

2000-02-09 Thread Daniel . Egger
Okay people, since there seems to be some i18n which I can't reproduce but a lot of people seem to experience it's time to take the next step. According to the bug report #6052 and the inline stacktrace it seems that menus_create_item in menus.c calles gtk_item_factory_create_item which

Re: Let's squeeze this i18n bug (quoting by heart) - bug report #6052

2000-02-09 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 9 Feb, Mike wrote: Here is the file log you requested in order to have an easier debugging. Hopefully it can be useful, so that you fix this bug! BTW: On my box, not all locales (as Mark said in his report) are broken. I tested out them all, and I found that only it and de crash gimp.-

Re: Pathtool?

2000-02-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 6 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: This has been mentioned at least three times on this list: one of them works, the other doesn't. Both don't work correctly, as I stated before. Do you read my mails? The Bezier Select Tool behaves very strange: Points appear automatically here and there and

Re: Pathtool?

2000-02-06 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Nick Lamb wrote: Please do not step forward and say "I'll do it", the time for that was in November or at the latest December, and there was conspicuous silence during my last Triage thread from those named to defend their code. You are right, it's time to cleanup. Unfortunately

Re: [gimp-devel] Re: Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-06 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Thats not the point. The point is effective user feedback. Now, where are the users? :) Here is one. If you are not a user you should not decide whats best for them. Especially not if you limit your horizon to a single person (yourself). I'm running tests

Re: Removing pencil?

2000-02-06 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: Argh.. I am used to toggle between paintbrush and pencil. Like I pointed out in my previous mail on this thread, I use the paintbrush as a "fine tuning" tool together with the "real" tool I am drawing with. And if it is the paintbrush, then there is no way

Re: Performance

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote: I wouldn't be too sure about that. On a system that I was previously administering (students' network at the university), I have seen some users that were using /var/tmp or /tmp to store their applications while they were logged in, and deleted the stuff

Re: [gimp-devel] Re: Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Feb, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I'm constantly finding myself looking for tools. I know that they are there, but I have to stop and look closer at almost every single tool. There are simply too many tools (some of them could well be combined), and the icons look very much the same

Removing pencil?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
Hiho! I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time? It contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of hard edges (anyone needing that "feature"?)... Anyway: This is up for discussion on

Pathtool?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
Hi developers, At the moment we have got 2 Pathtools in GIMP. One which is called Bezierselect in the Toolbox but has a Path dialog (in the Layers/Channels dialog???) and another one called Path tool. The latter works a lot nicer IMHO but I haven't managed yet to transform a path into a

Re: Edit Fille behaviour change?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: What does Photoshop do? What does that matter? Photoshop is the most used graphicstool out there and it makes sense to have a closer look on their behaviour especially in the UI sector. Anyway, even if books do now say that Fill fills with the

Re: Pathtool?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, FUJITA Yuji wrote: Which one should we keep? Or better: should we merge it into one Tool which works nicely AND has a support dialog? I hope them to be merged into one tool with support dialog. Anyway, the dialog window title should be something like "Layers, Channels and

Re: Removing pencil?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: It is a very important feature, believe me! It's your right to consider it useful, I don't and won't believe you... But the pencil can easily be merged with the Paintbrush by adding a "Hard Edges" option. Yes, if you appreciate. But the makes the eraser

Re: The toolbox...

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: It works much better now (/me thanks Kelly). "much" is a bit too much... :) It definitely works better but the current behaviour isn't acceptable for the release anyway Well, if you don't see the advantages of a more configurable toolbox layout, I

Re: Removing pencil?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro wrote: I'm all for removing the Path Tool, the Xinput Airbrush and and merging Pencil and Paintbrush. If I counted correctly this would reduce the number of tools to 24. This is a perfect number of tools since 24 % [2|3|4] == 0 which means we always get a nicely

Re: Pathtool?

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the Paths dialog? No, not yet, but I'll have a closer look on this. A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by doing so. That's why I say: It's too late! Every line of code

Re: Performance

2000-02-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Feb, Arcterex wrote: I think that this was discussed some time back and the conclusion was that if you have 5 users on your system all using gimp and each using 50%... well, you see where that could be a problem. In that case you could adjust the value manually. But bear in mind: If

Re: Performance

2000-02-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote: I think that asking the user is the best solution in any case, because you can hope that the user has some vague idea of how much memory is or will be available on the system he is using (shared or personal computer). This will not work in all cases (e.g.

Re: installing .po files in addition to .gmo files?

2000-02-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Hmm... I removed gimp-perl.pot now. However, all the other .pot files _are_ in cvs. Shouldn't be, the files are generated at compile time and ignored by CVS... Whats the logic behind that? Server:/usr/src/gimp/po # less .cvsignore *.gmo *.mo Makefile

Re: installing .po files in addition to .gmo files?

2000-02-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: You seem to want to move the catalogs to the home directorys, which is much worse (one copy for each user is insane). But would work Do you have any _reasons_ not having a seperate domain (speed? usability?) AFAIK it'S only in a few places neede

Re: Updating 1.0.4 plug-ins to work with 1.1.x

2000-02-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Now that you mention it, I have the same problem since around 1.1.13 or so. However, that was the time I installed XFree-3.9.1x, so I thought this is a bug in my X-Server. XFree-3.9.1* isn't guilty, at least not general as I cannot reproduce this without

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Steinar H.Gunderson wrote: In my illusion at least making tags from events and the way back should be simpler... The problem with Perl is the parsing step, not the recording step. We already have well-working code for parsing/running Perl. That sentence doesn't make a lot of

Re: Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Your: " Category New File " Looks IMHO much worse than the existing: " Category New File Settings " Not really, you have the word "Preferences" just a few mm above it. Also there was some inconsistency: The category "Monitor Information"

Re: installing .po files in addition to .gmo files?

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Well, yes, but I guess they wouldn't want to translated them themselves, so why personal i.e. with catalog in the home directory? Because it's the only user-writable place on a machine. I only talk about installing plug-ins _seperately_ from the gimp.

Re: Documenting the source?

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: /** * gimp_size_entry_new: * @number_of_fields: the number of entries * @unit: the default unit * @unit_format: a pointer to a format string describing the unit The good thing is that gtk-doc checks that the documentation and the source are in sync and

Re: Documenting the source?

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: Well, does it support the GTK+ object system like gtk-doc does? I guess not and that's why I suggest that we stop discussing what tool to use since I doubt we will find something better suited to our needs. It supports crossreferences, what else do you want?

Re: installing .po files in addition to .gmo files?

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: So that means that we need a new domain, such as "gimp-override", that resides in .gimp/locale and is consulted just like gimp-perl and gimp-plug-ins. No The command you're asking for is msgunfmt... Hmm... sounds like the solution. You pribably made

Re: Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Not really, you have the word "Preferences" just a few mm above it. No, I haven't. Sounds like you should send a bugreport to the authors of your favourite windowmanager I have no problems with these!! Consistency is great, I am just against removing

Re: [gimp-devel] Re: Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-02 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Simon Budig wrote: Hmm - I dont like the first too, since it is unclear what preferences are adjusted inside "New File". "New File Settings" is not much better... What about "New File Defaults" ? Sounds good. So, what about the "Colors-Curves" Thing ? It is a tool isnt it?

Re: Plugins at Sourceforge

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote: additional plug-ins. Some things, like translations, must be part of the distribution currently. This needs to be fixed. :) Do you volunteer? I don't understand translations at all. :) What a pity... I'm currently trying to dissolve all these

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: You don't seem to be very familiar with gnome-libs, especially not with the progress that was/is being made towards the next release. Uhm, not quite except that I'm trying to compile it every three days... gnome-print for printing (preview, native printer

Re: Plug-In manag(er|ing)

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 31 Jan, Marc Lehmann wrote: BTW: we need to consult a ~/.gimp/po/ directory for translations as well at some point in the future! Bad luck, I don't know why you like to have a personal catalog directory but with gettext you have either ... or ... and setting up such a system which uses

Some UI inconsistencies and a patch....

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
Hiho developers... I discovered some name glitches in GIMP. 1. The "Settings" in the preferences Dialog wasn't in everything and is useless nevertheless because a preferences dialog is supposed to contain settings... 2. Some tools had a "Tool" in the options dialog and some not.

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote: Macro recording and XML are two *completely* orthogonal things. Macro recording gets possible by programming it, not by using a difefrent format to save config files. You could use XML for saving macros. Of course you could also use scheme BUT: There are

Documenting the source?

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
Hi developers, Having no real documentation of the sourcecode is really a burden when searching for bugs. Do you agree that having a documentation would be fine? I'd like to introduce a in-source-documentation which an extractor program could use to make a TeX or HTML file of it. Using

Re: Usage of Gnome libs (was: Re: Print plugin)

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: This is supposed to be first class font-rendering and if it prooves to be useful, I see no reason not to use it, even it has gnome printed on it. Well, if it really is first class rendering, then I'd like to see it in GIMP I haven't yet seen this package,

Re: Documenting the source?

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote: We have already brought up this issue lately and I think the conclusion was that we try to add documentation for libgimp before 1.2. Most certainly we will use gtk-doc with comments embedded into the source. Marc volunteered to write the necessary scripts to

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: Well, we _do_ have gimp-perl available... Uhm, yes... With XML, we'd have to write _both_ loader and saver There are fantastic parsers available, no need to write any of those. -- with gimp-perl (or Perl-Fu, whatever name you like best), we'll

Re: Colormanagement

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Martí María wrote: So, any volunteers? This piece of code is highly interesting but since this won't make into GIMP before 1.2 because of the featurefreeze I really hope that all GIMP developers will concentrate on the project until we released the next stable version. --

Re: Print plug-in

2000-02-01 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Feb, Shawn T . Amundson wrote: But hasn't Mozilla basically given up on this idea and just used their own toolkit? Mozilla certainly looks crappy on the Mac at any rate. Not yet... at the moment it's possible to use even gtk or qt for the UI but they are slowly migrating to their

Re: Translation inconsistency

2000-01-31 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 31 Jan, Sven Neumann wrote: (A) do nothing, ignore the problem (B) don't mark the strings for translation, not in the core, neither in the plug-ins (C) mark the core PDB strings for possible translation too Kick them -- Servus, Daniel

Re: Plugins at Sourceforge

2000-01-31 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 28 Jan, Michael J. Hammel wrote: Do you mean language locales? I'm not very familiar with working with multi-language issues, but I have wondered why this isn't handled by the plug-ins directly. Because it won't work entirely this way... localisation works for everything but the menues

Re: Print plug-in 3.0.5 patch

2000-01-27 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 27 Jan, Robert L Krawitz wrote: diff -rc print/README /tmp/print/README Please use diff -u for further patches to preserve readability and attach them to prevent line wrapping to slash the patch -- Servus, Daniel

Re: Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-26 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 25 Jan, Marc Lehmann wrote: I really do not understand this. The stacktrace simply does not work. Attaching a debugger is much better, but still: the core file a segv would create would be _far_ more reliable. I buy the argument that users can do bug reports better with an automatic

Re: Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-24 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 24 Jan, Raphael Quinet wrote: Any suggestions for the name of the new option? It could be something like "--disable-stack-trace" or "--disable-crash-query", assuming that the default behaviour would be to have it enabled in unstable releases. Note that I also support the idea posted

Re: menu translation again - how does it work?

2000-01-17 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 14 Jan, Marc Lehmann wrote: So, if at all possible, could some translation expert find a fix for this problem, and I'll just add Logulator to app/menus.c in the meantime. Or did I misunderstand the general plan for translation? I thought that would already have been fixed? At the moment

Nasty problem in new file requester...

2000-01-17 Thread Daniel . Egger
Hiho! I recently discovered that using one of the spinbuttons in the filenew dialog causes redrawing of the whole upper table and thus flickering. This is quite annoying because it prevents users from using the spinbuttons to choose their imagesize because it is impossible (on my AMD K6-2

Re: Call for plugin maintainance

2000-01-06 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Jan, Sven Neumann wrote: on our way from 1.0 to 1.2 we included a few plug-ins that were considered not to be stable enough to be included with a stable release. This was done in the hope that the inclusion into the 1.1 developement tree would encourage people to work on those

Re: libgimp(ui), iibintl and (l)gpl problems

1999-12-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Dec, Marc Lehmann wrote: However, if we solve this problem by *linking* libintl against libgimpui we get another problem: linking against libintl automatically puts libgimpui under the GPL. If you are using glibc2 then you've got not problem with lgpl, because its LGPL itself then...

Re: Tons of useless translations???

1999-11-27 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Nov, Michael Natterer wrote: I did some debugging there and noticed that gettext() returns "/Datei/tearoff1" for _any_ string which has the form "*/tearoff1" (). This is either a bug in our po-files, a bug in gettext or a feature of gettext which allows to do some magic by

Re: Tons of useless translations???

1999-11-27 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 27 Nov, Marc Lehmann wrote: PS: does gimp now translate by component or still using the whole path? Componentwise... BTW: Is there any special reson I can't unsubscribe from this list and subscribe again with another address? Quite annoying -- Servus, Daniel

Re: Tons of useless translations???

1999-11-27 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Nov, Marc Lehmann wrote: (btw, can anybody tell me why redhat ignores LANG? and what is this LINGUAS thing anyway? maybe because other variables like LC_ALL are also set and take precedence?) LANG will be just used if no other LC_* is set to something... and LINGUAS are all possible

Re: Help System

1999-11-11 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 10 Nov, Kevin Cozens wrote: Reading the discussions re: the help system has made me think I understand why compiling GIMP always broke at a point where it needed a GtkXmhtml header file. I use a RedHat system without Gnome installed and I'm beginning to understand that GtkXmhtml is a

Re: Plugins

1999-11-11 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 8 Nov, Marc Lehmann wrote: Hint: It's the way menues are handled by Gtk... And if this leads to segfaults it is surely a bug in gkt+? No, really, I am _simply_ interested in how a call to gettext can result in a "legal" segfault. The most likely way to cause a segfault is to write

Re: Plugins

1999-11-11 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 10 Nov, Marc Lehmann wrote: That all plug-ins that are part of the distribution should have corretc translated menu entries is (for me) obvious. The problem is new (third-party) plug-ins. These problems are solvable by a consistent way to handle the translations. Im working on these but

Re: GIMP Plug-ins for other Apps? - LGPL for some GIMP modules?

1999-11-11 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 11 Nov, Andrew Kieschnick wrote: Hmm, that sure as hell looks like an LGPL to me. I seriously doubt your copy of gimp is different than mine... LGPL stands for "Lesser GNU Public Licence". Now do me a favour and count the word lesser in this COPYING file... Then do this again for the

Re: I18N

1999-11-10 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 9 Nov, Sven Neumann wrote: Daniel Eggert wrote: BTW: My name spelled E g g e r without any 't' Ok, here's my setup: glib: uptodate from CVS (1.2 branch) gtk+: uptodate from CVS (1.2 branch) gimp: uptodate from CVS glibc: libc-2.0.7 Well, my version is glibc is a bit

Re: GIMP Plug-ins for other Apps? - LGPL for some GIMP modules?

1999-11-09 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 2 Nov, Andrew Kieschnick wrote: Gimp plug-ins are not linked into the calling program (they are run as separate processes), so you can call them from any program you like without violating the GPL. However you have to link Plug-ins against libgimp and possibly libgimpui and here

Re: I18N

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 1 Nov, David Monniaux wrote: The stupid I18N behaviour of the week: when menus are translated, any string for which the system finds no translation gets translated to "Fichier" (in French), which means "File". I don't know the innards of the translation system, but a fact is that

Re: Plugins

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Nov, Marc Lehmann wrote: This sounds interesting (explain!).. how can i18n lead to segfaults? Not again Marc, we have had this discussion before Hint: It's the way menues are handled by Gtk... Me included! Maybe I shouldn´t even reply here.. ;- Maybe :) Well, half-translated

Re: Plugins

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Nov, Michael Natterer wrote: Just because I didn't write for many files "using the context here fixes a bug" doesn't mean it didn't. E.g. the device status dialog was totally unusable after a "refresh" and ensuring it's consistency without the context would have needed another weird

Re: i18n problem

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Nov, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro wrote: Is your translation table fr.po ? It seems to be broken when I tried to "make update-po". Duplicated entries, possibly a merging problem. Patch is on its way... -- Servus, Daniel

Re: i18n problem

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 4 Nov, Sven Neumann wrote: If it is, the german de.po is broken too, since I experience the same weird problem here. No, the catalogs are definitely all right (but the French one, but that incorrectness can't cause the explained behaviour) -- Servus, Daniel

Re: i18n problem

1999-11-07 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Nov, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro wrote: What menuitems are replaced by Datei? I could not reproduce the problem. Me, too... I'll try to investigate the problem -- Servus, Daniel

Re: Plugins

1999-11-03 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 3 Nov, Michael Natterer wrote: Note: At the moment featurefreeze is more violated by the changes done by for example Michael than by the ideas I'm having which would be something like "little changes with big positive effects"... Just because I didn't write for many files "using the

Re: Icons in LC dialog (and elsewhere)

1999-10-29 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 23 Oct, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: Speaking of that, how hard would it be to make the toolbar buttons also use the .xpm format? Now the icons are in the header files.. it's pretty hard for a art.geek like me to change the icons or try different versions.. Also for 'T0olb4r ThemeZ' it would

Re: Plugins

1999-10-29 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 29 Oct, David Monniaux wrote: I agree with Daniel. I18N maintainers already have too much to do. Frankly, I think we should try to ship 1.2 before changing how plug-ins are handled. It would be really helpful to know the thoughts of other developers or even or great maintainer to this

Re: object layers

1999-10-06 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 5 Oct, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: Mmm... what is a gimpmodule? A module is an extension which has much more control over the GIMP then a plugin. How is it supposed to work? Use the source... :)) Where can I find some examples? (The current distribution comes without any