Gimp-Print 4.3.21, released September 24, 2003, is a development
release of this package. Like all development releases, this version
is considered unstable and should only be used by those individuals
tolerant of the likelihood of problems. Individuals desiring a stable
release of Gimp-Print sho
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:17:56 +0200
From: David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As any of you who have been following CVS know, we have been
working towards a 2.0 pre1 release for the end of this month, and
there are now very few blockers to that release left.
However, there are mor
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27 Sep 2003 12:20:23 +0200
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don´t know who will be doing it, but it was not until this week that
> I noted taht there is no way of printing more than one coppy at once
> with the pr
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27 Sep 2003 21:23:51 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And also, if it cannot be made possible to spread a image
>> over several pages and tile the results, as that would be
>
Gimp-Print 4.3.22, released November 1, 2003, is a development
release of this package. Like all development releases, this version
is considered unstable and should only be used by those individuals
tolerant of the likelihood of problems. Individuals desiring a stable
release of Gimp-Print shoul
Gimp-Print 4.3.23, released November 4, 2003, is a development
release of this package. Like all development releases, this version
is considered unstable and should only be used by those individuals
tolerant of the likelihood of problems. Individuals desiring a stable
release of Gimp-Print shoul
Gimp-Print 4.2.6-rc1, released November 15, 2003, is a release
candidate in the Gimp-Print 4.2 series. We expect that 4.2.6, when
the final version is released, to be the last release in the 4.2
series.
Gimp-Print is a suite of printer drivers that may be used with most
common UNIX print spooling
NOTE: This is planned to be the last development release prior to
alpha for the next stable line, and it contains a number of major
enhancements. Please test this thoroughly!
Gimp-Print 4.3.24, released November 21, 2003, is a development
release of this package. Like all development releases,
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 Dec 2003 18:59:57 +0100
I don't use Mac OS X myself but I regulary get the chance to watch
people using it and to talk to them. Lately I even got involved in
writing software for it. My impression is that in order to make
GIMP a suc
Gimp-Print 4.2.6, released January 11, 2004, is a stable release
in the Gimp-Print 4.2 series. This is expected to be the last release
in the 4.2 series.
Gimp-Print is a suite of printer drivers that may be used with most
common UNIX print spooling systems, including CUPS, lpr, LPRng, or
others.
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Alpha! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-alpha1 is the first alpha release (technology preview)
in the line that will eventually lead to Gimp-Print 5.0. It is based
on the 4.3 series that has been in development for two years, and
includes many
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 04 Feb 2004 15:08:43 +0100
Please note that GIMP does MDI (multiple document interface)
already, it just doesn't folllow the WiW (window in window)
approach that some people seem to prefer for obscure reasons.
Every reference I've ever s
From: Juhana Sadeharju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:04:11 +0200
You don't know? There could be many. Using somebody else's name
and address is one, that is up to Sven and others to decide what
they do about it.
There's nothing at all that Sven can do about it. So
Does 2.0 have any functioning print plugin? If not, what changes need
to be made to the current 4.2-based plugin?
--
Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Progra
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:49:13 +0100
From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Does 2.0 have any functioning print plugin? If not, what changes need
> to be made to the current 4.2-based plugin?
As far as I know, if you have gimp-print 4.2.x i
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:25:23 +0100
From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> I'm the Gimp-Print project lead, that's why I asked the question :-)
I know :) Sorry to hear the 5.0 release is still a bit away.
> In the 5.0 tre
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 Mar 2004 14:19:13 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the 5.0 tree, the plugin has been split into two pieces, a UI
> library (libgimpprintui) and the GIMP plugin proper (which is tiny,
>
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 Mar 2004 14:04:47 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does 2.0 have any functioning print plugin? If not, what changes
> need to be made to the current 4.2-based plugin?
It has a functional p
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13 Mar 2004 03:45:21 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libgimpprint is a GTK+ (1.2 right now) UI, without any linkage to
> libgimp.
It will have to be ported to the GTK+-2.x API if you want it to
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13 Mar 2004 12:03:21 +0100
Frank Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As first the good, i can print now with gimp2.0pre4. And now the
> bad. If i use a ppd file in the preferences from postscript
> level2 in gimp i lost the preview an
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:29:09 +
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Note to the gimp-print developers: You should consider to s
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Mar 2004 01:33:10 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to make it clear: the reason we don't use Glib in the core
> is that it isn't part of the standard load on a lot of platfor
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Mar 2004 02:50:09 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fink and Darwinports are simply not options for mainline OS X
> users. Mac users want to literally buy a machine and turn it on.
> Thi
From: Frank Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:40:22 +0100
I have any trouble with printing the new gimp2.0(pre4). It works fine if i use
LANG=en. But if i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] i cant print with using the ppd file.
If i dont use the ppd file it works. I use
S
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Mar 2004 17:26:05 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please try this patch to src/main/print-ps.c. It resets the locale
> around all potentially risky operations, although it may turn out to
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:44:14 +
From: Till Kamppeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 14 Mar 2004 17:26:05 +0100
>
>Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13 Mar 2004 13:10:08 +0100
Frank Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Its the same problem that i had before. It works fine with build in
> language (en) if i use it in german it fails. Now i can print with
> Turborint but without ppd-
From: Frank Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:04:34 +0100
Am Freitag, 19. März 2004 03:38 schrieb Robert L Krawitz:
>From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 13 Mar 2004 13:10:08 +0100
>
>Frank Noack <[EMAIL PROTEC
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Mar 2004 21:47:52 +0200
Hi,
I suggested that we make a list of changes for 2.2, so I sat down and
tried to come up with such a list. This list is not meant as the list
of things that need to go into 2.2 but it's a list of things th
I'd like to establish a schedule for the rest of the 5.0 release.
We're currently about 8 (!) months behind the original plan. This was
initially mostly due to the OS X issues, although it worked out for
the best, since the color API is much better and we have a working
Foomatic database, among ot
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 23 Apr 2004 13:10:00 +0200
Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, I think that having a look at the ChangeLog is the
> best way (although cumbersome) to figure out who is working on
> what. Maybe we could make this e
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Alpha 3! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-alpha3 is the third alpha release (technology
preview) in the line that will eventually lead to Gimp-Print 5.0. It
is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for two years,
and includes ma
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 01:18:30 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:03:36 +0100
>
>Does a
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 May 2004 11:19:10 +0200
your post (and other mails on the gimp-print-devel list) make me
believe that there isn't much hope for a stable gimp-print API to
appear during the next weeks. Is that right? This means that we
have to chang
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25 May 2004 10:54:00 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we do this right, then we can change libgimpprint to our heart's
> content and the GIMP plugin will go merrily on its way, without
Unfortunately, the gtkcurve widget doesn't allow setting the control
points of the curve, only setting a dense curve
(gtk_curve_set_vector). There may be a back door way of doing it, but
that carries obvious hazards.
There's also no official interface for extracting the control points.
The upsho
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 30 May 2004 12:44:05 +0200
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, the gtkcurve widget doesn't allow setting the control
> points of the curve, only setting a dense curve
> (gtk
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Beta 1! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-beta1 is the first beta prerelease of Gimp-Print 5.0.
It is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for over
two years, and includes many improvements over the very popular 4.2
series. This
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Aug 2004 00:10:48 +0200
I think it's about time to start to discuss what features we still
want to get into GIMP 2.2. We are targetting a feature freeze by
the end of the month and a release shortly after, so it's probably
about tim
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Aug 2004 11:15:38 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only API change we're looking at right now is adding
> dimension-valued parameters. These are like numerical
> parameters, e
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Aug 2004 12:53:25 +0200
Hi,
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>GIMP has all this already, why would you want to deal with units in
>a library such as gimp-print?
>
> Two reasons:
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Aug 2004 02:39:20 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right. The problem is how the application determines whether a
> particular parameter is a measurement or just an arbitrary floating
> po
Are there any users of BSD (particularly FreeBSD 4.10) running the
GIMP 2.0 and trying to print, but having trouble with the print
locking up when it's done and not completing until you exit the GIMP?
Someone has reported something like this, and I'd like to understand
what's going on. It's probab
Welcome to Gimp-Print 5.0 Beta 2! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gimp-Print 5.0.0-beta2 is the second beta prerelease of Gimp-Print
5.0. It is based on the 4.3 series that has been in development for
over two years, and includes many improvements over the very popular
4.2 series. Th
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Sep 2004 17:52:20 +0200
a while ago we decided for a feature freeze for GIMP 2.2 that
should have taken effect last week. I haven't enforced this feature
freeze yet because there's been some good hacking going on recently
and I thin
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:21:49 +0100
From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sven Neumann wrote:
> - implement color management as was discussed earlier
Firstly, I've been quiet on this subject for a few weeks because
I've bought a new printer, and my limited coding
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:34:41 +0100
From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would *really* be helpful to plug this into the Print plugin, if
> not Gimp-Print itself, so that when the GIMP feeds 8 bit values to the
> plugin these values are reprocessed into 16 bit val
If whoever's maintaining the OS X port of the GIMP is reading this,
it's apparently missing a Print plugin.
By: Mark Townsend - marktownsend
Printing from GIMP, OSX
2004-09-26 09:13
I just hope that the answer to this one is not so obvuous that I will be embarassed.
I have been using GIMP Print
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:23:49 +0100
From: Tino Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 01:12:33PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > [1] Working ain't gonna be fun - I once had an A1 poster at 300 dpi on
> > an 6 GB machine and GIMP's swap grow as large as anothe
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be
changed easily, our users will not any longer know what so
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:16:37 +1300
From: Jonty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is there a problem using gimp-print 5.0.0 with gimp 2.2, or is this
a configure problem?
checking for gimpprint-config... /usr/bin/gimpprint-config
checking for GIMP-PRINT - version >= 4.2.0...
*** GIMP-PRI
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:53:01 -0800
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2) The jpeg plug-in now pretty closely adheres to the instructions
in the exif specifications concerning which fields should be
altered by an image-editing program. There are a couple of
fi
From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:08:33 +0100
> canon rebel uses DOS.
Possibly only as a bootloader or datashifter.
According to
http://www.alexbernstein.com/wiki/CanonDigitalRebelHacking
the camera has three different processors and it is more
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:16 +0100
From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Selon Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is now a file called "exif-handling.txt" in devel-docs
> that summarizes my understanding, based on the exif
&g
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Krawitz wrote:
> 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in
> pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into
> standard alignment. I thought it wa
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:34:54 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something that forces me to do an extra gratuitous step for
> loading every portrait I ever shoot is a massive pain in the butt
>
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:53:35 +0100
"William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in
> pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into
> standard alignment. I thoug
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:36:50 +0100
From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert L Krawitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[Exif orientation tag]
> The obvious question is: if the rotation information isn't important,
> why does the camera even bother with it, as
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:49:17 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My policy is to never muck with the original -- PERIOD. Yes, I could
> always make copies, but that would use more disk space. This
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:24:49 -0800
From: Akkana Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sven Neumann writes:
> Assuming your camera adds EXIF info, are you seriously telling me
> that you do not run 'exiftran -a -i' on each and every image you
> ever shoot and instead use GIMP to rotate them?
From: "Hal V. Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:09:29 -0800
You can add me to the list. I also leave my originals alone. As you=20
say this is just good photographic practice. I have negatives that=20
are almost 70 years old that are in nearly new condition tha
From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:44:41 +0100
On 10.01.2005, at 16:52, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> Unless I'm being told untruth about the losslessness (soundss great,
> doesn't it?), the metaphor of not messing around with negatives isn't
> appropriate
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:29:15 -0800
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On loading an exif-jpeg file, it (1) calls
gimp_metadata_store_exif(), and (2) extracts the orientation from
the exif and, if it is not top-left, queries the user whether to
rotate the image.
I know
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:32:15 -0800
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you.
> Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I
> think that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image
> when opening it without marki
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:32:44 +
From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Robert,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any
> other EXIF-aware viewer or editor?
I doubt an
From: "Hal V. Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:24:30 -0800
--nextPart10261261.yohHSzoVkz
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 03 February 2005 23:27, Tino Sch
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:16:56 +0100
"Hal V. Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have also tried installing GTK 2.4 on SuSE 9.1 without success. I
> have not tried 2.6 yet. SuSE 9.1 comes with GTK 2.2.4. Many things
> stop working wh
BTW, I just dropped a note to James Ogley (maintainer of
usr-local-bin) to see if he has any plans to upgrade his stuff to gtk
2.6.
--
Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:36:29 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There could be plenty of other reasons why, of course. But it isn't
> FUD for people to report that they're having problems co
From: "Hal V. Engel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:17 -0800
I probably should have said that I believed that the problems I
had=20 with GTK 2.4 were likely caused by the RPMs I was using
(user local=20 bin) as I had not tried building it myself. So this
is a Su
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:48:03 +0100
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am curious to see what changes having gtk+-2.6 bring to poor gimp.
> many of the problems with the 2.4 fileselector get shoved off because of
> this
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:57:59 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought it was supposed to allow actually typing in a filename?
> The really bad point of the 2.4 file selector is that (at least as
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:19:14 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's terribly obvious :-( If the entry box isn't visible, how is
> anyone to know that you can actually do this?
You can
From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:03:14 +0100
this is my suggested patch for getting the speeds improvements
as mentioned in the other thread by having a thread-local PRNG
initialized with a seed from the still existing blend tool local
RNG.
It
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:29:52 +0100
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use the same matrix for all color channels, but offset the starting
> address for each channel to decorrelate the channels.
>
Welcome to Gutenprint 5.0.0-beta4! Please read these release notes
carefully.
Gutenprint, formerly named Gimp-Print, is a suite of printer drivers
that may be used with most common UNIX print spooling systems,
including CUPS, lpr, LPRng, or others. These drivers provide high
quality printing for
From: "Dr. George W. Oprisko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:30:16 +0800
Hello everyone !
I am an old systems engineer, who began on IBM1130's in 71. Started
with Unix Version 7 in 81. Lots of C later C++.
I made my living creating user interfaces with the X11R6
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:40:37 +0200
> If you want details then "exactly as in gtk+-1.0" should suffice,
> because that dialog simply worked. No extra window, no slow extra
> popups that you have to wait for, no fancy and distracting
> _hil
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:14:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dennis Bjorklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Marc wrote:
> One thing is that people, and _many_ people, just want their location
> entry back, for lots of reasons: discoverability, pastability and so
> on. But for s
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dennis Bjorklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The ctrl-L popup has lots of problems; not only is it not
> apparent how to get to it (there's nothing that points at
> ctrl-L), but it's very clumsy to use (you have to type ctrl-L,
> type
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:18:34 +0200
>> (3) Don't try to advertise the old GtkFileSelection dialog as being
>> the solution that we should revert too.
>
> I didn't. I did advertise the way the old file selection dialog used
> it's te
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:12:05 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven, you've been offered a solution -- just add an entry with tab
> completion. You may not agree with it, but it's not accu
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:09:06 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> Lots of people have.
Sorry but I haven't seen a detailed and complete proposal yet. If
you can point me to one, please do.
Here's one: add a text
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:35:51 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't that at least enough reason to take a closer look at the
> issue?
Are you as well starting with this accusation now? We are
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:43:07 -0400
From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been contributing suggestions both here and on the
bugzilla.gnome.org bug (whose number I forget). Yes, it's true that
my suggestion boils down to "bring back the text
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:13:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I do not disagree with Sven on this. Please do not count me in on
this arguement, I probably should not have commented at all. On
balance the new file chooser is better, it just happens to be worse
So here's a half baked proposal. Make of it what you will. I am
beginning to see why it is quite complicated.
The current file chooser stays the same by default, except that a
label is added somewhere that reads "Type a filename" or whatever (to
give some kind of visual cue that you can type a f
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:12:17 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I am packaging up gimp 2.2.8 for Linspire and have noticed some strange
issues in the print dialog that my non-existent C skills have been
unable to resolve.
I'm not the best in the world at
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:28:54 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'm the project lead for Gutenprint. Can you describe for me more
>specifically what you mean? Why will it "fail as it is"?
Because there are no values automatically filled in to the Left,
Right, L
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:30:54 -0400
From: michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 8/15/05, Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am packaging up gimp 2.2.8 for Linspire and have noticed some strange
> When the print dialog is open, the orientation is set to "Auto",
> whic
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:41:15 -0400
From: michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 8/15/05, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That shouldn't have any effect here. Gimp-Print doesn't really care
> what the underlying spooling system is.
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:52:33 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
michael chang wrote:
>On 8/15/05, Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>michael chang wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 8/15/05, Brian Thomaso
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:50:14 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>I've never seen anything like this, with the dimension/positioning
>boxes not filled in, even when using the Postscript driver without a
>PPD file. W
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:30:35 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Roger, Brian has a rather odd problem whereby when he starts the
>Print plugin on a fresh image he gets completely empty positioning
>boxes (nothing filled in for any of the position/sizing boxes).
>I
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:19:57 -0700
From: Bill Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:33:56AM -0700, Brian Thomason wrote:
> We did that, and the plugin works, but the orientation/position fields
> are all empty upon launching it.
FWIW, I fired up Gimp on my
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:42:01 -0700
From: Brian Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:19:57 -0700
> From: Bill Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tue, Au
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:39:39 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This helps. The GIMP actually includes its own copy of the Print
> plugin, but I don't know exactly what source that's based on
From: Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:58:14 +0100
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> This helps. The GIMP actually includes its own copy of the Print
>> p
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:36:22 +0200
Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) I don't remember anyone ever feeding them back to us. Mitch did
>some improvements once, years ago, but no one's eve
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
